首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials最新文献

英文 中文
Brachial Plexus Constraints in Two-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. 两分段脊柱立体定向体放射治疗中的臂丛神经限制。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001103
Shearwood McClelland
{"title":"Brachial Plexus Constraints in Two-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.","authors":"Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":"47 9","pages":"458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Success of Ultra-low Dose Radiation Therapy for Primary Cutaneous B-cell Lymphoma. 超低剂量放射治疗原发性皮肤 B 细胞淋巴瘤取得成功
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001113
Louisa Onyewadume, Shearwood McClelland

Objectives: Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) is a relatively rare disease, associated with 5-year overall survival of nearly 95% when treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone. However, standard EBRT doses yield acute skin toxicity in more than 70% of patients and grade 3 to 4 acute skin toxicity in nearly 10% of patients. Consequently, the PCBCL treatment paradigm is shifting towards lower EBRT doses. This study evaluates our early experience with ultra-low dose EBRT (total dose of 4 Gy in 2 fractions) for PCBCL.

Methods: Four biopsy-confirmed PCBCL lesions (1 anterior thigh and 3 chest) in 2 male patients were treated with 2 Gy×2 fraction EBRT using electrons through a clinical setup. The anterior thigh lesion was treated using a clamshell to protect the scrotum from scatter dose. Treatment was achieved using 9 MeV electrons to the 85% isodose line using no bolus, with follow-up every 4 months and potential retreatment if no visible response at 8 to 9 months.

Results: All lesions demonstrated a response to EBRT by 4 months, visibly manifesting as flattening with changes in pigmentation. At the last follow-up (20, 20, 16.5, and 4 mo, respectively), all lesions had flattened with no evidence of local recurrence and no skin toxicity.

Conclusions: Treatment of PCBCL with ultra-low dose EBRT to 4 Gy total dose in 2 fractions provides durable local control with zero skin toxicity. These results are encouraging for both the success of treatment and the potential to use similarly low doses for retreatment should patients exhibit local recurrence.

目的:原发性皮肤 B 细胞淋巴瘤(PCBCL)是一种相对罕见的疾病:原发性皮肤 B 细胞淋巴瘤(PCBCL)是一种相对罕见的疾病,单纯采用体外放射治疗(EBRT)时,5 年总生存率接近 95%。然而,标准剂量的 EBRT 会导致 70% 以上的患者出现急性皮肤毒性,近 10% 的患者会出现 3 至 4 级急性皮肤毒性。因此,PCBCL 的治疗模式正在向更低的 EBRT 剂量转变。本研究评估了我们采用超低剂量EBRT(总剂量为4 Gy,分两次进行)治疗PCBCL的早期经验:两名男性患者的四个活检证实的 PCBCL 病灶(1 个大腿前侧,3 个胸部)通过临床设备接受了 2 Gy×2 分段 EBRT 治疗。治疗大腿前部病灶时使用了蛤壳,以保护阴囊免受散射剂量的影响。治疗时使用9 MeV电子至85%等剂量线,不使用栓剂,每4个月随访一次,如果8至9个月无明显反应,则可能进行再治疗:结果:所有病灶在 4 个月后都对 EBRT 有反应,明显表现为变平和色素改变。在最后一次随访时(分别为20、20、16.5和4个月),所有病灶均变平,无局部复发迹象,无皮肤毒性:结论:使用超低剂量EBRT治疗PCBCL,总剂量为4 Gy,分2次进行,可实现持久的局部控制,且无皮肤毒性。这些结果令人鼓舞,不仅证明了治疗的成功,而且如果患者出现局部复发,也有可能使用类似的低剂量进行再治疗。
{"title":"Success of Ultra-low Dose Radiation Therapy for Primary Cutaneous B-cell Lymphoma.","authors":"Louisa Onyewadume, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001113","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) is a relatively rare disease, associated with 5-year overall survival of nearly 95% when treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone. However, standard EBRT doses yield acute skin toxicity in more than 70% of patients and grade 3 to 4 acute skin toxicity in nearly 10% of patients. Consequently, the PCBCL treatment paradigm is shifting towards lower EBRT doses. This study evaluates our early experience with ultra-low dose EBRT (total dose of 4 Gy in 2 fractions) for PCBCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four biopsy-confirmed PCBCL lesions (1 anterior thigh and 3 chest) in 2 male patients were treated with 2 Gy×2 fraction EBRT using electrons through a clinical setup. The anterior thigh lesion was treated using a clamshell to protect the scrotum from scatter dose. Treatment was achieved using 9 MeV electrons to the 85% isodose line using no bolus, with follow-up every 4 months and potential retreatment if no visible response at 8 to 9 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All lesions demonstrated a response to EBRT by 4 months, visibly manifesting as flattening with changes in pigmentation. At the last follow-up (20, 20, 16.5, and 4 mo, respectively), all lesions had flattened with no evidence of local recurrence and no skin toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of PCBCL with ultra-low dose EBRT to 4 Gy total dose in 2 fractions provides durable local control with zero skin toxicity. These results are encouraging for both the success of treatment and the potential to use similarly low doses for retreatment should patients exhibit local recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"431-433"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140960499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy-Related Lymphopenia Is Associated With Worse Survival in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. 不可切除的肝内胆管癌患者因低分量放疗引起的淋巴细胞减少症导致生存率下降
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001108
Grace Lee, Daniel W Kim, Alicia C Smart, Nora K Horick, Christine E Eyler, Hannah J Roberts, Priyadarshini Pathak, Lipika Goyal, Joseph Franses, James M Heather, William L Hwang, Clemens Grassberger, Samuel J Klempner, Lorraine C Drapek, Jill N Allen, Lawrence S Blaszkowsky, Aparna R Parikh, David P Ryan, Jeffrey W Clark, Theodore S Hong, Jennifer Y Wo

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of radiotherapy (RT)-related lymphopenia, its predictors, and association with survival in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with hypofractionated-RT (HF-RT).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 96 patients with unresectable ICC who underwent HF-RT (median 58.05 Gy in 15 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 was performed. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir within 12 weeks of RT was analyzed. Primary variable of interest was severe lymphopenia, defined as Grade 3+ (ALC <0.5 k/μL) per CTCAE v5.0. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) from RT.

Results: Median follow-up was 16 months. Fifty-two percent of patients had chemotherapy pre-RT, 23% during RT, and 40% post-RT. Pre-RT, median ALC was 1.1 k/μL and 5% had severe lymphopenia. Post-RT, 68% developed RT-related severe lymphopenia. Patients who developed severe lymphopenia had a significantly lower pre-RT ALC (median 1.1 vs. 1.5 k/μL, P =0.01) and larger target tumor volume (median 125 vs. 62 cm 3 , P =0.02). In our multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia was associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk of death ( P =0.04); 1-year OS rates were 63% vs 77% ( P =0.03). Receipt of photon versus proton-based RT (OR=3.50, P =0.02), higher mean liver dose (OR=1.19, P <0.01), and longer RT duration (OR=1.49, P =0.02) predicted severe lymphopenia.

Conclusions: HF-RT-related lymphopenia is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with unresectable ICC. Patients with lower baseline ALC and larger tumor volume may be at increased risk, and use of proton therapy, minimizing mean liver dose, and avoiding treatment breaks may reduce RT-related lymphopenia.

研究目的本研究旨在评估放疗(RT)相关淋巴细胞减少症的发生率、预测因素以及与采用低分次放疗(HF-RT)治疗的不可切除肝内胆管癌(ICC)生存率的关系:方法: 对2009年至2022年间接受HF-RT(中位数58.05 Gy,15次分次)治疗的96例不可切除ICC患者进行回顾性分析。分析了 RT 12 周内的绝对淋巴细胞计数 (ALC) 最低值。主要关注变量为严重淋巴细胞减少,定义为 3+ 级(ALC 结果):中位随访时间为 16 个月。52%的患者在 RT 前接受了化疗,23%的患者在 RT 期间接受了化疗,40%的患者在 RT 后接受了化疗。放疗前,ALC 中位数为 1.1 k/μL,5% 的患者出现严重淋巴细胞减少症。放疗后,68%的患者出现了与放疗相关的严重淋巴细胞减少症。出现严重淋巴细胞减少症的患者RT前ALC显著较低(中位数为1.1 vs. 1.5 k/μL,P=0.01),靶肿瘤体积较大(中位数为125 vs. 62 cm3,P=0.02)。在我们的多变量 Cox 模型中,严重淋巴细胞减少与死亡风险增加 1.7 倍相关(P=0.04);1 年 OS 率为 63% vs 77%(P=0.03)。接受光子RT与质子RT相比(OR=3.50,P=0.02),平均肝脏剂量更高(OR=1.19,PC结论:高频RT相关淋巴细胞减少症是不可切除ICC患者生存率的独立预后因素。基线ALC较低和肿瘤体积较大的患者风险可能会增加,使用质子治疗、尽量减少平均肝脏剂量和避免治疗中断可减少RT相关淋巴细胞减少症。
{"title":"Hypofractionated Radiotherapy-Related Lymphopenia Is Associated With Worse Survival in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Grace Lee, Daniel W Kim, Alicia C Smart, Nora K Horick, Christine E Eyler, Hannah J Roberts, Priyadarshini Pathak, Lipika Goyal, Joseph Franses, James M Heather, William L Hwang, Clemens Grassberger, Samuel J Klempner, Lorraine C Drapek, Jill N Allen, Lawrence S Blaszkowsky, Aparna R Parikh, David P Ryan, Jeffrey W Clark, Theodore S Hong, Jennifer Y Wo","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001108","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of radiotherapy (RT)-related lymphopenia, its predictors, and association with survival in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with hypofractionated-RT (HF-RT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 96 patients with unresectable ICC who underwent HF-RT (median 58.05 Gy in 15 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 was performed. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir within 12 weeks of RT was analyzed. Primary variable of interest was severe lymphopenia, defined as Grade 3+ (ALC <0.5 k/μL) per CTCAE v5.0. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) from RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 16 months. Fifty-two percent of patients had chemotherapy pre-RT, 23% during RT, and 40% post-RT. Pre-RT, median ALC was 1.1 k/μL and 5% had severe lymphopenia. Post-RT, 68% developed RT-related severe lymphopenia. Patients who developed severe lymphopenia had a significantly lower pre-RT ALC (median 1.1 vs. 1.5 k/μL, P =0.01) and larger target tumor volume (median 125 vs. 62 cm 3 , P =0.02). In our multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia was associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk of death ( P =0.04); 1-year OS rates were 63% vs 77% ( P =0.03). Receipt of photon versus proton-based RT (OR=3.50, P =0.02), higher mean liver dose (OR=1.19, P <0.01), and longer RT duration (OR=1.49, P =0.02) predicted severe lymphopenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HF-RT-related lymphopenia is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with unresectable ICC. Patients with lower baseline ALC and larger tumor volume may be at increased risk, and use of proton therapy, minimizing mean liver dose, and avoiding treatment breaks may reduce RT-related lymphopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"373-382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141066305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer in Shorter and Longer Follow-Up Duration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 贝伐单抗联合疗法与标准化疗治疗卵巢癌的随访时间长短对比:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001100
Obaid Ur Rehman, Eeshal Fatima, Hiba Imran, Umar Akram, Amna Badar Ahmad, Zain Ali Nadeem, Laveeza Fatima, Ahmad Hussain, Manar Alaa Mabrouk, Muhammad Zain Farooq

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer over a shorter and longer follow-up period.

Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar for all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that administered bevacizumab to women with ovarian cancer. Review Manager 5.4 was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs. We assessed the quality of the included studies using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).

Results: After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts, we included nine RCTs in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Four RCTs had a low risk of bias, while 5 had some concerns. Bevacizumab was associated with a progression free survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.76, P <0.0001, I2 =90%) and >36 months (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80, P <0.0001, I2 =80%), and an overall survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, P =0.02, I2 =0%) but not for >36 months (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.09, P =0.77, I2 =30%). There was no difference in deaths between intervention and control groups <36 months (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04, P =0.26, I2 =10%) or >36 months (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.06, P =0.50, I2 =0%). Bevacizumab reduced disease progression <36 months (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.92, P =0.0008, I2 =82%) but not at >36 months (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.19, P =0.30, I2 =94%). The adverse events reported with Bevacizumab use included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukocytopenia, anemia, hypertension, bleeding or hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal, cardiac, and dermatological adverse events.

Conclusion: Bevacizumab may improve progression-free survival within and after 36 months, overall survival within 36 months, and reduce disease progression within 36 months.

研究目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估贝伐单抗在较短和较长随访期内对卵巢癌患者的疗效和安全性:我们检索了 Medline、Cochrane CENTRAL、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 中所有对卵巢癌女性患者使用贝伐单抗的 3 期随机对照试验 (RCT)。使用Review Manager 5.4计算风险比(RR)和危险比(HR)及95% CI。我们使用科克伦偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)第 2 版评估了纳入研究的质量:经过对标题、摘要和全文的筛选,我们在系统综述和荟萃分析中纳入了 9 项研究。其中 4 项研究的偏倚风险较低,5 项研究存在一些问题。贝伐单抗与36个月的无进展生存期相关(HR:0.66,95% CI:0.55-0.80,P36个月(HR:0.98,95% CI:0.89-1.09,P=0.77,I2=30%)。干预组和对照组 36 个月的死亡人数没有差异(RR:1.02,95% CI:0.97-1.06,P=0.50,I2=0%)。贝伐单抗可在36个月内减少疾病进展(RR:0.83,95% CI:0.58-1.19,P=0.30,I2=94%)。贝伐珠单抗的不良反应包括血小板减少、中性粒细胞减少、白细胞减少、贫血、高血压、出血或大出血,以及胃肠道、心脏和皮肤不良反应:结论:贝伐珠单抗可改善36个月内和36个月后的无进展生存期、36个月内的总生存期,并减少36个月内的疾病进展。
{"title":"Bevacizumab Combination Therapy Versus Standard Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer in Shorter and Longer Follow-Up Duration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Obaid Ur Rehman, Eeshal Fatima, Hiba Imran, Umar Akram, Amna Badar Ahmad, Zain Ali Nadeem, Laveeza Fatima, Ahmad Hussain, Manar Alaa Mabrouk, Muhammad Zain Farooq","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001100","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer over a shorter and longer follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar for all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that administered bevacizumab to women with ovarian cancer. Review Manager 5.4 was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs. We assessed the quality of the included studies using version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening the titles, abstracts, and full texts, we included nine RCTs in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Four RCTs had a low risk of bias, while 5 had some concerns. Bevacizumab was associated with a progression free survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45-0.76, P <0.0001, I2 =90%) and >36 months (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80, P <0.0001, I2 =80%), and an overall survival benefit for <36 months (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98, P =0.02, I2 =0%) but not for >36 months (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.09, P =0.77, I2 =30%). There was no difference in deaths between intervention and control groups <36 months (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.04, P =0.26, I2 =10%) or >36 months (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.97-1.06, P =0.50, I2 =0%). Bevacizumab reduced disease progression <36 months (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.92, P =0.0008, I2 =82%) but not at >36 months (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.19, P =0.30, I2 =94%). The adverse events reported with Bevacizumab use included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukocytopenia, anemia, hypertension, bleeding or hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal, cardiac, and dermatological adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bevacizumab may improve progression-free survival within and after 36 months, overall survival within 36 months, and reduce disease progression within 36 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"399-408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141441070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concurrent Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Radiation Therapy in HER2-positive and HER2-low Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-center Experience and Review of the Literature. 在 HER2 阳性和 HER2 低的转移性乳腺癌中同时使用曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦和放疗:单中心经验与文献综述》。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001135
Jihane Bouziane, Pierre Loap, Kim Cao, Sofiane Allali, Yacine Gounane, Gokoulakrichenane Loganadane, Laurence Escalup, Jean-Yves Pierga, Youlia Kirova

Objectives: Recent DESTINY-Breast trials have demonstrated trastuzumab deruxtecan's effectiveness in HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. However, safety concerns remain regarding its combination with radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this work is to assess the toxicity profile of combining trastuzumab deruxtecan and RT in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer to address these concerns.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study which included patients treated at Institut Curie Paris between November 2020 and January 2024. Patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who received concurrent trastuzumab deruxtecan and RT were identified. Data on patient demographics, treatment regimens, radiation doses, toxicity profiles, and treatment discontinuations were collected. Follow-up was conducted from the last day of radiotherapy until death or the last examination and toxicities were graded using the CTCAE V5.0.

Results: The studied population includes all 33 patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who underwent concurrent treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan and radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 11 months. The most common acute grade 1 toxicity was nausea. Grade 2 toxicities affected 21.2% of patients, including asthenia, mucositis, cardiac decompensation, and diarrhea. Trastuzumab deruxtecan discontinuation occurred in 5 patients due to systemic treatment-related toxicities, including nausea, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and cardiac decompensation. There were 21.2% reported with late toxicities, with nausea being the most prevalent.

Conclusions: Our series of patients who received concurrent treatment of radiotherapy and trastuzumab deruxtecan are showing acceptable toxicity. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of this combination.

目的:最近进行的DESTINY-Breast试验表明,曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦对HER2阳性和HER2低下的转移性乳腺癌有效。然而,该药与放疗(RT)联用的安全性仍令人担忧。本研究旨在评估曲妥珠单抗德鲁西坦与放疗联合治疗HER2阳性和HER2低度转移性乳腺癌患者的毒性概况,以解决这些问题:我们开展了一项回顾性研究,研究对象包括2020年11月至2024年1月期间在巴黎居里研究所接受治疗的患者。研究确定了同时接受曲妥珠单抗德鲁司康和 RT 治疗的 HER2 阳性和 HER2 低转移性乳腺癌患者。研究人员收集了患者的人口统计学、治疗方案、放射剂量、毒性概况和治疗中止等数据。随访时间从放疗的最后一天开始,直至患者死亡或最后一次检查,并使用 CTCAE V5.0 对毒性进行分级:研究对象包括所有33名HER2阳性和HER2低的转移性乳腺癌患者,他们同时接受了曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦和放疗。中位随访时间为 11 个月。最常见的急性1级毒性是恶心。21.2%的患者出现2级毒性,包括气喘、粘膜炎、心脏衰竭和腹泻。5名患者因全身治疗相关毒性(包括恶心、血小板减少、中性粒细胞减少和心脏失代偿)而停用曲妥珠单抗-德鲁西康。据报道,21.2%的患者出现了晚期毒性反应,其中以恶心最为常见:我们的系列研究显示,同时接受放疗和曲妥珠单抗德鲁司康治疗的患者的毒性是可以接受的。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来评估这种联合疗法的毒性和疗效。
{"title":"Concurrent Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Radiation Therapy in HER2-positive and HER2-low Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-center Experience and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Jihane Bouziane, Pierre Loap, Kim Cao, Sofiane Allali, Yacine Gounane, Gokoulakrichenane Loganadane, Laurence Escalup, Jean-Yves Pierga, Youlia Kirova","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recent DESTINY-Breast trials have demonstrated trastuzumab deruxtecan's effectiveness in HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. However, safety concerns remain regarding its combination with radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this work is to assess the toxicity profile of combining trastuzumab deruxtecan and RT in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer to address these concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study which included patients treated at Institut Curie Paris between November 2020 and January 2024. Patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who received concurrent trastuzumab deruxtecan and RT were identified. Data on patient demographics, treatment regimens, radiation doses, toxicity profiles, and treatment discontinuations were collected. Follow-up was conducted from the last day of radiotherapy until death or the last examination and toxicities were graded using the CTCAE V5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studied population includes all 33 patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who underwent concurrent treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan and radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 11 months. The most common acute grade 1 toxicity was nausea. Grade 2 toxicities affected 21.2% of patients, including asthenia, mucositis, cardiac decompensation, and diarrhea. Trastuzumab deruxtecan discontinuation occurred in 5 patients due to systemic treatment-related toxicities, including nausea, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and cardiac decompensation. There were 21.2% reported with late toxicities, with nausea being the most prevalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our series of patients who received concurrent treatment of radiotherapy and trastuzumab deruxtecan are showing acceptable toxicity. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of this combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Subgroups on Study Outcomes in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Upfront Systemic Treatment: A Meta-analysis. 分组对接受前期系统治疗的不可切除肝细胞癌研究结果的影响:一项 Meta 分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001133
Giuseppe Antonio Colloca, Antonella Venturino

Objectives: Immunotherapy improved the outcome of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, but not all studies are in agreement, nor is it clear whether certain subgroups have really benefited. This study aims to perform an updated meta-analysis of trials comparing upfront immunotherapy-based regimens versus tyrosin-kinase inhibitors, and some exploratory analyses.

Methods: After a systematic review, randomized trials of immunotherapy-based regimens versus tyrosin-kinase inhibitors were selected. A meta-analysis assessed the relationship between treatment arm and overall survival. Based on the resulting heterogeneity, a further investigation of 11 variables by meta-regression and an exploration of subgroups were planned.

Results: Eight studies were selected. From the meta-analysis, the overall survival improvement for the immunotherapy-based arms was consistent (HR: 0.77, CI: 0.68-0.88), although heterogeneity between studies was significant ( Q =16.37; P =0.0373; I2 =51.1%). After meta-regression, the effect of the experimental arm was more pronounced in the elderly and lost among patients with HCV-related liver disease. Subgroups suggested a favorable effect of immunotherapy in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma, extrahepatic dissemination, and elevated alpha-fetoprotein.

Conclusion: The study results confirm the significant overall survival improvement after immunotherapy-based regimens but suggest different effects on the outcome depending on age, etiology of liver disease, and tumor burden.

目标:免疫疗法改善了不可切除肝细胞癌患者的预后,但并非所有研究结果都一致,也不清楚某些亚组是否真正受益。本研究旨在对前期免疫治疗方案与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的比较试验进行最新的荟萃分析,并进行一些探索性分析:方法:经过系统回顾,筛选出基于免疫疗法的方案与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的随机试验。荟萃分析评估了治疗臂与总生存期之间的关系。基于由此产生的异质性,计划通过元回归对11个变量进行进一步研究,并对亚组进行探讨:结果:共选取了八项研究。荟萃分析结果显示,基于免疫疗法的治疗组的总生存率改善情况一致(HR:0.77,CI:0.68-0.88),但研究间的异质性显著(Q=16.37;P=0.0373;I2=51.1%)。经过元回归后,实验组的效果在老年人中更为明显,而在患有 HCV 相关肝病的患者中则有所减弱。亚组显示,免疫疗法对HBV相关肝细胞癌、肝外播散和甲胎蛋白升高的患者有有利影响:研究结果证实,基于免疫疗法的治疗方案可明显改善总体生存率,但根据年龄、肝病病因和肿瘤负荷的不同,对疗效的影响也不同。
{"title":"Effect of Subgroups on Study Outcomes in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Upfront Systemic Treatment: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Giuseppe Antonio Colloca, Antonella Venturino","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001133","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immunotherapy improved the outcome of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, but not all studies are in agreement, nor is it clear whether certain subgroups have really benefited. This study aims to perform an updated meta-analysis of trials comparing upfront immunotherapy-based regimens versus tyrosin-kinase inhibitors, and some exploratory analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a systematic review, randomized trials of immunotherapy-based regimens versus tyrosin-kinase inhibitors were selected. A meta-analysis assessed the relationship between treatment arm and overall survival. Based on the resulting heterogeneity, a further investigation of 11 variables by meta-regression and an exploration of subgroups were planned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were selected. From the meta-analysis, the overall survival improvement for the immunotherapy-based arms was consistent (HR: 0.77, CI: 0.68-0.88), although heterogeneity between studies was significant ( Q =16.37; P =0.0373; I2 =51.1%). After meta-regression, the effect of the experimental arm was more pronounced in the elderly and lost among patients with HCV-related liver disease. Subgroups suggested a favorable effect of immunotherapy in patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma, extrahepatic dissemination, and elevated alpha-fetoprotein.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study results confirm the significant overall survival improvement after immunotherapy-based regimens but suggest different effects on the outcome depending on age, etiology of liver disease, and tumor burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Salbutamol, a Short Acting Beta-2 Agonist, Reduces Risk and Improves Prognosis of Prostate Cancer. 短效 Beta-2 激动剂沙丁胺醇可降低前列腺癌风险并改善预后。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001134
Steven Lehrer, Peter H Rheinstein

Objectives: Beta-blockers, a class of drugs commonly used to manage blood pressure, have been the subject of research regarding their relationship to prostate cancer (PC) risk, prognosis, and treatment. Beta-blockers reduce risk and improve the prognosis of PC. Perioperative use of a nonselective beta-blocker improves outcomes after radical prostatectomy. However, a related class of drugs, beta-2 adrenergic agonists, has received little attention in PC.

Methods: We studied the relationship of the beta-2 adrenergic agonist salbutamol to PC risk and survival. We analyzed Food and Drug Administration MedWatch data to determine whether salbutamol could influence the risk of PC. We used UK Biobank data to assess the effect of salbutamol on PC survival.

Results: Salbutamol significantly reduces PC risk, proportional reporting ratio, and 95% CI (lower bound; upper bound): 0.131 (0.11; 0.155) and improves prognosis. Mean survival was 7.35 years for subjects not taking salbutamol, and 10.5 years for subjects taking salbutamol (P = 0.041, log-rank test. To adjust for the effect of age, we performed proportional hazards regression, survival time-dependent variable, age, and salbutamol use independent variables. Salbutamol use was significantly related to survival time (P = 0.016) and independent of the significant effect of age (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: We found a lower proportion of PCs in salbutamol-treated people, but we have not demonstrated that PC risk is reduced (there is no proof of causality). There is no causality relationship between salbutamol and the survival of patients with PC treated with salbutamol versus those not treated with the drug. Yet, there is a trend in favor of salbutamol-treated patient survival. Therefore, salbutamol and other beta-adrenergic agonists might represent a new class of drugs for the treatment of PC.

研究目的β-受体阻滞剂是一类常用于控制血压的药物,一直是有关其与前列腺癌(PC)风险、预后和治疗之间关系的研究课题。β-受体阻滞剂可降低 PC 的风险并改善预后。围手术期使用非选择性β-受体阻滞剂可改善根治性前列腺切除术后的预后。然而,β-2 肾上腺素能激动剂这一类相关药物在 PC 中却很少受到关注:我们研究了β-2肾上腺素能激动剂沙丁胺醇与PC风险和存活率的关系。我们分析了美国食品和药物管理局的 MedWatch 数据,以确定沙丁胺醇是否会影响 PC 风险。我们利用英国生物库数据评估了沙丁胺醇对PC存活率的影响:沙丁胺醇能明显降低 PC 风险,比例报告比和 95% CI(下限;上限)分别为0.131 (0.11; 0.155) 并改善预后。未服用沙丁胺醇的受试者的平均生存期为 7.35 年,而服用沙丁胺醇的受试者的平均生存期为 10.5 年(P = 0.041,对数秩检验)。为了调整年龄的影响,我们进行了比例危险度回归,存活时间为自变量,年龄和使用沙丁胺醇为自变量。使用沙丁胺醇与生存时间显著相关(P = 0.016),与年龄的显著影响无关(P < 0.001):我们发现接受沙丁胺醇治疗的患者中 PC 的比例较低,但我们并没有证明 PC 的风险降低了(没有因果关系的证据)。使用沙丁胺醇与未使用沙丁胺醇的 PC 患者的生存率之间没有因果关系。然而,沙丁胺醇治疗患者的存活率呈上升趋势。因此,沙丁胺醇和其他β-肾上腺素能激动剂可能是治疗PC的一类新药。
{"title":"Salbutamol, a Short Acting Beta-2 Agonist, Reduces Risk and Improves Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Steven Lehrer, Peter H Rheinstein","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Beta-blockers, a class of drugs commonly used to manage blood pressure, have been the subject of research regarding their relationship to prostate cancer (PC) risk, prognosis, and treatment. Beta-blockers reduce risk and improve the prognosis of PC. Perioperative use of a nonselective beta-blocker improves outcomes after radical prostatectomy. However, a related class of drugs, beta-2 adrenergic agonists, has received little attention in PC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied the relationship of the beta-2 adrenergic agonist salbutamol to PC risk and survival. We analyzed Food and Drug Administration MedWatch data to determine whether salbutamol could influence the risk of PC. We used UK Biobank data to assess the effect of salbutamol on PC survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Salbutamol significantly reduces PC risk, proportional reporting ratio, and 95% CI (lower bound; upper bound): 0.131 (0.11; 0.155) and improves prognosis. Mean survival was 7.35 years for subjects not taking salbutamol, and 10.5 years for subjects taking salbutamol (P = 0.041, log-rank test. To adjust for the effect of age, we performed proportional hazards regression, survival time-dependent variable, age, and salbutamol use independent variables. Salbutamol use was significantly related to survival time (P = 0.016) and independent of the significant effect of age (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a lower proportion of PCs in salbutamol-treated people, but we have not demonstrated that PC risk is reduced (there is no proof of causality). There is no causality relationship between salbutamol and the survival of patients with PC treated with salbutamol versus those not treated with the drug. Yet, there is a trend in favor of salbutamol-treated patient survival. Therefore, salbutamol and other beta-adrenergic agonists might represent a new class of drugs for the treatment of PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141555852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concurrent use of Radiotherapy and Ribociclib: Preliminary Results and Review of the Literature. 同时使用放疗和 Ribociclib:初步结果和文献综述。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001131
Jihane Bouziane, Pierre Loap, Paul Cottu, Laurence Escalup, Youlia Kirova

Objectives: In the recent MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, and MONALEESA-7 clinical trials, the addition of ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, to standard endocrine therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with hormone therapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER) and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, its toxicity raises concerns when administered concomitantly with radiotherapy, leading most radiotherapists and medical oncologists to prefer to discontinue Ribociclib during radiotherapy (RT). Although there are insufficient published data on this combination, our preliminary experience with the first 2 patients treated at Institut Curie suggests promising results when using Ribociclib with Letrozole or Fulvestrant concurrently with palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety of combining Ribociclib with palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, providing crucial insights for clinical decision-making.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer with Ribociclib and concurrent radiotherapy at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) between September 2023 and April 2024. Among 38 patients who received Ribociclib and underwent irradiation, 36 temporarily suspended Ribociclib during radiotherapy, while 2 continued Ribociclib concurrently and were included in the analysis. Palliative radiotherapy was administered using volumetric modulated arc therapy, delivering 20 Gy in 5 fractions to bone metastatic sites. Ribociclib was given at 600 mg/day with hormonotherapy. Follow-up was conducted from the last day of RT until the last medical consultation. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE V5.0.

Results: Two patients received Ribociclib concomitantly with radiotherapy, experiencing pain relief without interruptions in RT. However, Ribociclib treatment was halted in both cases due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 1 QTc interval prolongation, respectively. One patient had a dose reduction to 400 mg due to neutropenia, with favorable outcomes observed. Both patients continued Ribociclib treatment, with one achieving complete remission and the other partial remission of bone disease. No late toxicities were observed.

Conclusion: Despite the need for further investigation, our results suggest safety consistent with pivotal trials, advocating for a prospective cooperative data collection initiative to explore this combined strategy further, potentially revolutionizing metastatic breast cancer management.

研究目的在最近的MONALEESA-2、MONALEESA-3和MONALEESA-7临床试验中,在治疗局部晚期或转移性雌激素受体阳性(ER)和HER2阴性乳腺癌时,与单纯激素治疗相比,在标准内分泌治疗的基础上加用CDK4/6抑制剂Ribociclib可显著改善无进展生存期(PFS)。然而,在与放疗同时进行时,它的毒性引起了人们的关注,导致大多数放疗师和肿瘤内科医生倾向于在放疗(RT)期间停用 Ribociclib。虽然有关这种联合用药的公开数据不足,但我们在居里研究所治疗的首批两名患者的初步经验表明,在治疗转移性乳腺癌时,Ribociclib与来曲唑或氟维司群同时使用并配合姑息性放疗,会取得很好的疗效。我们的研究旨在评估转移性乳腺癌患者将Ribociclib与姑息性放疗联合使用的安全性,为临床决策提供重要依据:研究对2023年9月至2024年4月期间在居里研究所(法国巴黎)接受Ribociclib治疗并同时接受放疗的激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌患者进行了回顾性分析。在接受Ribociclib治疗并接受放射治疗的38名患者中,36名患者在放疗期间暂时停用了Ribociclib,2名患者在放疗期间继续服用Ribociclib,并纳入了分析。姑息放疗采用容积调制弧线疗法,分 5 次向骨转移部位照射 20 Gy。Ribociclib的剂量为600毫克/天,同时进行激素治疗。随访从 RT 的最后一天开始,直到最后一次就诊。毒性采用CTCAE V5.0进行分级:两名患者在接受放疗的同时接受了Ribociclib治疗,在不中断放疗的情况下缓解了疼痛。然而,这两名患者分别因3级中性粒细胞减少和1级QTc间期延长而停止了Ribociclib治疗。一名患者因中性粒细胞减少而将剂量减至400毫克,并观察到良好的治疗效果。两名患者都继续接受了 Ribociclib 治疗,其中一名患者的骨病得到了完全缓解,另一名患者的骨病得到了部分缓解。未观察到后期毒性反应:尽管还需要进一步研究,但我们的研究结果表明其安全性与关键性试验一致,因此主张开展前瞻性合作数据收集计划,进一步探索这种联合策略,从而有可能彻底改变转移性乳腺癌的治疗方法。
{"title":"Concurrent use of Radiotherapy and Ribociclib: Preliminary Results and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Jihane Bouziane, Pierre Loap, Paul Cottu, Laurence Escalup, Youlia Kirova","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the recent MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, and MONALEESA-7 clinical trials, the addition of ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, to standard endocrine therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with hormone therapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER) and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, its toxicity raises concerns when administered concomitantly with radiotherapy, leading most radiotherapists and medical oncologists to prefer to discontinue Ribociclib during radiotherapy (RT). Although there are insufficient published data on this combination, our preliminary experience with the first 2 patients treated at Institut Curie suggests promising results when using Ribociclib with Letrozole or Fulvestrant concurrently with palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety of combining Ribociclib with palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, providing crucial insights for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer with Ribociclib and concurrent radiotherapy at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) between September 2023 and April 2024. Among 38 patients who received Ribociclib and underwent irradiation, 36 temporarily suspended Ribociclib during radiotherapy, while 2 continued Ribociclib concurrently and were included in the analysis. Palliative radiotherapy was administered using volumetric modulated arc therapy, delivering 20 Gy in 5 fractions to bone metastatic sites. Ribociclib was given at 600 mg/day with hormonotherapy. Follow-up was conducted from the last day of RT until the last medical consultation. Toxicities were graded using CTCAE V5.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two patients received Ribociclib concomitantly with radiotherapy, experiencing pain relief without interruptions in RT. However, Ribociclib treatment was halted in both cases due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 1 QTc interval prolongation, respectively. One patient had a dose reduction to 400 mg due to neutropenia, with favorable outcomes observed. Both patients continued Ribociclib treatment, with one achieving complete remission and the other partial remission of bone disease. No late toxicities were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the need for further investigation, our results suggest safety consistent with pivotal trials, advocating for a prospective cooperative data collection initiative to explore this combined strategy further, potentially revolutionizing metastatic breast cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes of De Novo Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Surgery of Primary and Metastasis Directed Radiotherapy. 采用原发灶手术和转移灶定向放疗治疗新发寡转移性乳腺癌的疗效。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001129
Lincoln Pujari, Arvind Suresh, Zachariah Chowdhury, Satyajit Pradhan, Mayank Tripathi, Anuj Gupta, Prarabdh Singh, Prashanth Giridhar, Ankita R Kapoor, Abhishek Shinghal, Bipinesh Sansar, Manikandan Mv

Objectives: With sensitive imaging for breast cancer, the question arises whether present-day oncologists treat dOMBC with palliative systemic therapy (ST), which, a few years earlier, would have been treated with curative intent. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of dOMBC treated with curative intent using a combination of surgery, metastasis-directed radiotherapy (RT), and adjuvant/neoadjuvant ST and have also explored the possible role of total lesional glycolysis of metastases and p53 immunohistochemistry in predicting outcomes.

Methods: Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database using electronic medical records and Radiation Oncology Information System. In the study, dOMBC was defined as up to 3 metastatic sites, all amenable to treatment with ablative RT and primary and axillary disease amenable to curative surgery. Patients were treated with surgery, ST, and RT.

Results: Patients underwent either breast conservation surgery or modified radical mastectomy. Patients were treated with 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. Hormone receptor-positive patients received either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. Trastuzumab was offered to Her-2-neu receptor-positive patients. RT included locoregional RT and metastases-directed ablative body RT. The median progression-free survival was 39 months (95% CI: -28.7 to 50.1 mo). Two and 3 year estimated disease-free survival (DFS) was 79% and 60.5%, respectively. The median overall survival was not reached. The estimated 3-year overall survival was 87.3%. Total lesional glycolysis of metastases score and p53 status did not affect DFS.

Conclusion: Combination treatment of surgery, metastases-directed ablative RT, and ST may provide prolonged DFS in dOMBC.

目的:随着乳腺癌成像技术的发展,出现了这样一个问题:当今的肿瘤学家是否会用姑息性全身治疗(ST)来治疗dOMBC,而在几年前,这种治疗是以治愈为目的的。我们回顾性地分析了采用手术、转移灶引导放疗(RT)和辅助/新辅助ST等综合治疗手段进行根治性治疗的dOMBC的疗效,并探讨了转移灶的总病变糖酵解和p53免疫组化在预测疗效方面可能发挥的作用:数据收集自一个使用电子病历和放射肿瘤信息系统进行前瞻性维护的数据库。在研究中,dOMBC 被定义为多达 3 个转移部位,均可接受消融 RT 治疗,且原发和腋窝疾病可接受根治性手术治疗。患者接受手术、ST和RT治疗:患者接受了保乳手术或改良根治性乳房切除术。患者接受了6至8个周期的新辅助和/或辅助化疗。激素受体阳性患者接受他莫昔芬或芳香化酶抑制剂治疗。Her-2-neu受体阳性患者可使用曲妥珠单抗。RT包括局部RT和转移灶定向消融体RT。中位无进展生存期为39个月(95% CI:-28.7至50.1个月)。两年和三年的估计无病生存期(DFS)分别为79%和60.5%。总生存期未达到中位数。估计3年总生存率为87.3%。转移灶总病变糖酵解评分和p53状态对无病生存期没有影响:结论:手术、转移灶定向消融 RT 和 ST 联合治疗可延长 dOMBC 的 DFS。
{"title":"Outcomes of De Novo Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Surgery of Primary and Metastasis Directed Radiotherapy.","authors":"Lincoln Pujari, Arvind Suresh, Zachariah Chowdhury, Satyajit Pradhan, Mayank Tripathi, Anuj Gupta, Prarabdh Singh, Prashanth Giridhar, Ankita R Kapoor, Abhishek Shinghal, Bipinesh Sansar, Manikandan Mv","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With sensitive imaging for breast cancer, the question arises whether present-day oncologists treat dOMBC with palliative systemic therapy (ST), which, a few years earlier, would have been treated with curative intent. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of dOMBC treated with curative intent using a combination of surgery, metastasis-directed radiotherapy (RT), and adjuvant/neoadjuvant ST and have also explored the possible role of total lesional glycolysis of metastases and p53 immunohistochemistry in predicting outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database using electronic medical records and Radiation Oncology Information System. In the study, dOMBC was defined as up to 3 metastatic sites, all amenable to treatment with ablative RT and primary and axillary disease amenable to curative surgery. Patients were treated with surgery, ST, and RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients underwent either breast conservation surgery or modified radical mastectomy. Patients were treated with 6 to 8 cycles of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. Hormone receptor-positive patients received either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. Trastuzumab was offered to Her-2-neu receptor-positive patients. RT included locoregional RT and metastases-directed ablative body RT. The median progression-free survival was 39 months (95% CI: -28.7 to 50.1 mo). Two and 3 year estimated disease-free survival (DFS) was 79% and 60.5%, respectively. The median overall survival was not reached. The estimated 3-year overall survival was 87.3%. Total lesional glycolysis of metastases score and p53 status did not affect DFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combination treatment of surgery, metastases-directed ablative RT, and ST may provide prolonged DFS in dOMBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nomogram Predicting Grade ≥2 Acute Radiation Enteritis in Patients With Cervical Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. 预测同时接受化疗放疗的宫颈癌患者≥2级急性放射性肠炎的提名图
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001096
Fei Chen, Xiaoqin Gong, Kaijun Zhang, Yunpeng Yu, Tao You, Ye Hua, Chunhua Dai, Jing Hu

Objective: To analyze the risk factors for grade ≥2 ARE in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: A total of 273 patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our hospital were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into training and validation groups. Clinical parameters were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram model was established based on the independent risk factors selected using multivariate logistic regression. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the nomogram. The patients were divided into low-score and high-score groups based on the scores calculated using the nomogram model and compared.

Results: Malnutrition, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio ≥0.82 after radiotherapy, platelet-lymphocyte ratio <307.50 after radiotherapy, and bowelbag volume receiving at least 5 and 40 Gy were independent risk factors for grade ≥2 ARE and were incorporated into the nomogram ( P <0.05). The ROC curve, calibration curve, and DCA suggested that the nomogram had good discrimination, concordance, and net benefit in the clinical. A medium nomogram score of 146.50 points was used as the cutoff point, and the incidence of grade ≥2 ARE in the high-score group was higher than that in the low-score group ( P <0.05).

Conclusion: The nomogram model for grade ≥2 ARE has good predictive ability and clinical utility, and is convenient for clinicians to identify high-risk groups and develop early prevention and treatment strategies.

目的:分析同时接受放化疗的宫颈癌患者发生≥2级ARE的风险因素:方法:回顾性纳入本院接受同期放化疗的 273 例宫颈癌患者。将患者分为训练组和验证组。采用单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归分析对临床参数进行分析。根据多变量逻辑回归筛选出的独立风险因素,建立了一个提名图模型。采用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对提名图进行评估。根据使用提名图模型计算出的分数将患者分为低分组和高分组,并进行比较:营养不良、放疗后单核细胞-淋巴细胞比值≥0.82、血小板-淋巴细胞比值 结论:放疗后单核细胞-淋巴细胞比值≥0.82、血小板-淋巴细胞比值≥0.82:≥2级ARE的提名图模型具有良好的预测能力和临床实用性,便于临床医生识别高危人群并制定早期预防和治疗策略。
{"title":"Nomogram Predicting Grade ≥2 Acute Radiation Enteritis in Patients With Cervical Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Fei Chen, Xiaoqin Gong, Kaijun Zhang, Yunpeng Yu, Tao You, Ye Hua, Chunhua Dai, Jing Hu","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001096","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the risk factors for grade ≥2 ARE in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 273 patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our hospital were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into training and validation groups. Clinical parameters were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram model was established based on the independent risk factors selected using multivariate logistic regression. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the nomogram. The patients were divided into low-score and high-score groups based on the scores calculated using the nomogram model and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Malnutrition, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio ≥0.82 after radiotherapy, platelet-lymphocyte ratio <307.50 after radiotherapy, and bowelbag volume receiving at least 5 and 40 Gy were independent risk factors for grade ≥2 ARE and were incorporated into the nomogram ( P <0.05). The ROC curve, calibration curve, and DCA suggested that the nomogram had good discrimination, concordance, and net benefit in the clinical. A medium nomogram score of 146.50 points was used as the cutoff point, and the incidence of grade ≥2 ARE in the high-score group was higher than that in the low-score group ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nomogram model for grade ≥2 ARE has good predictive ability and clinical utility, and is convenient for clinicians to identify high-risk groups and develop early prevention and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"317-324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191554/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140133146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1