首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials最新文献

英文 中文
Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 标准与扩展盆腔淋巴结切除术在膀胱癌患者中的应用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001206
Hunaina Aman, Muhammad Hamza, Asad Ramzan, Mariam Saqib, Zain Ul Abideen, Abdul Haseeb, Hira Habib, Aiza Bint-E-Shafqat, Abdul Azeez Umar Azad, Hira Waris, Mushood Ahmed, Muhammad Ayyan, Nouman Aziz

Objectives: For decades, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) has been a critical component of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Although its role in curative surgery for high-risk non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive cases is well-established, the therapeutic advantages of extended PLND remain a topic of ongoing debate.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of major bibliographic databases was performed from inception to November 2024. Studies comparing extended PLND (extended or super extended) with standard PLND were identified. Data for clinical outcomes was extracted and pooled estimates were calculated using a random effects model with RevMan 5.4.

Results: A total of 11 studies (2 RCTs and 9 observational) were included reporting data for 4001 patients. The pooled analysis demonstrated that extended PLND was associated with significantly better recurrence-free survival (HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.74). Standard PLND led to significantly higher 5-year recurrence rates (RR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.28-1.62) compared with the extended approach. The pooled estimates for disease-specific survival (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.62-1.19), overall survival (HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.16), and complications remained comparable.

Conclusions: Extended PLND can lead to favorable recurrence-free survival and 5-year recurrence rates. However, retrospective observational studies mainly drive the evidence, and additional RCTs are required to reach a definitive conclusion.

目的:几十年来,盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)一直是膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术的关键组成部分。虽然它在高风险非肌创和肌创病例的治疗性手术中的作用是公认的,但扩展PLND的治疗优势仍然是一个持续争论的话题。方法:从建站至2024年11月对各大书目数据库进行综合文献检索。对扩展PLND(扩展或超扩展)与标准PLND进行了比较研究。提取临床结局数据,使用RevMan 5.4随机效应模型计算汇总估计。结果:共纳入11项研究(2项随机对照试验和9项观察性研究),报告了4001例患者的数据。合并分析表明,延长PLND与更好的无复发生存相关(HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.74)。与扩展方法相比,标准PLND的5年复发率明显更高(RR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.28-1.62)。疾病特异性生存(HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.62-1.19)、总生存(HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.16)和并发症的汇总估计仍然具有可比性。结论:延长PLND可导致良好的无复发生存和5年复发率。然而,回顾性观察性研究主要推动证据,并需要额外的随机对照试验来得出明确的结论。
{"title":"Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Hunaina Aman, Muhammad Hamza, Asad Ramzan, Mariam Saqib, Zain Ul Abideen, Abdul Haseeb, Hira Habib, Aiza Bint-E-Shafqat, Abdul Azeez Umar Azad, Hira Waris, Mushood Ahmed, Muhammad Ayyan, Nouman Aziz","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001206","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>For decades, pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) has been a critical component of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Although its role in curative surgery for high-risk non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive cases is well-established, the therapeutic advantages of extended PLND remain a topic of ongoing debate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of major bibliographic databases was performed from inception to November 2024. Studies comparing extended PLND (extended or super extended) with standard PLND were identified. Data for clinical outcomes was extracted and pooled estimates were calculated using a random effects model with RevMan 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies (2 RCTs and 9 observational) were included reporting data for 4001 patients. The pooled analysis demonstrated that extended PLND was associated with significantly better recurrence-free survival (HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.74). Standard PLND led to significantly higher 5-year recurrence rates (RR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.28-1.62) compared with the extended approach. The pooled estimates for disease-specific survival (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.62-1.19), overall survival (HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.16), and complications remained comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extended PLND can lead to favorable recurrence-free survival and 5-year recurrence rates. However, retrospective observational studies mainly drive the evidence, and additional RCTs are required to reach a definitive conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"479-487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144065245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Patient, Disease, and Social Determinants of Health on Receipt of Nonoperative Management for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma. 患者、疾病和健康的社会决定因素对直肠腺癌患者接受非手术治疗的影响
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001243
Keaton A Rummel, Christopher L Hallemeier, Zhaohui Jin, Kenneth W Merrell, Hao Xie, Kellie L Mathis, Nicholas P McKenna, Mark R Waddle, Michael G Haddock, Cameron M Callaghan, Krishan R Jethwa

Objectives: For locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (R-ACA), a nonoperative management (NOM) approach has emerged as a guideline-supported treatment option. However, the variables associated with NOM receipt are unknown.

Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage 1 to 3 R-ACA managed with curative intent from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving NOM versus surgery. The secondary outcome was survival among NOM patients.

Results: A total of 128,297 patients were included. In all, 115,888 (90.3%) received surgery and 12,409 (9.7%) received NOM. Receipt of NOM was associated with age above 70, Charlson-Deyo score of 0, race (Black, Asian or Pacific Islander, or other vs. White), insurance status, geographical region, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2012-2018 vs. 2004-2011), tumor grade 1 versus ≥ 2, clinical T-stage ≥ 2, and clinical N1 or N2 versus N0. In the NOM cohort, poorer overall survival was associated with age 70 and above, male sex, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1, insurance status, geographical region, rural urban density versus metro/urban, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2004-2011 vs. 2012-2018), clinical T4 versus T1, clinical N1 or N2 versus N0, grade 3 versus 1, treatment with a radiotherapy dose <45 Gy versus 45 to 54 Gy, and omission of chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Several demographic factors and social determinants of health were associated with receipt of NOM and overall survival. With the increasing utilization of NOM, it will be important to understand the drivers of treatment decisions and influences on access to the desired treatment approach.

目的:对于局部晚期直肠腺癌(R-ACA),非手术治疗(NOM)方法已成为一种指南支持的治疗选择。然而,与NOM接收相关的变量是未知的。方法:利用国家癌症数据库,我们对2004年至2018年以治疗为目的的1至3期R-ACA成人进行了回顾性队列研究。主要结局是接受NOM和手术的患者比例。次要终点是NOM患者的生存。结果:共纳入128,297例患者。总共有115,888人(90.3%)接受了手术,12,409人(9.7%)接受了NOM。接受NOM与年龄大于70岁、Charlson-Deyo评分为0、种族(黑人、亚洲人或太平洋岛民,或其他与白人)、保险状况、地理区域、社区设施治疗、诊断年份(2012-2018年与2004-2011年)、肿瘤分级1与≥2、临床t期≥2、临床N1或N2与N0相关。在NOM队列中,较差的总生存率与年龄70岁及以上、男性、Charlson-Deyo评分≥1、保险状况、地理区域、农村城市密度与城市/城市密度、社区设施治疗、诊断年份(2004-2011年vs 2012-2018年)、临床T4与T1、临床N1或N2与N0、3级与1级、放疗剂量相关。一些人口因素和健康的社会决定因素与接受NOM和总生存率有关。随着NOM的使用越来越多,了解治疗决策的驱动因素以及对获得所需治疗方法的影响将变得非常重要。
{"title":"The Impact of Patient, Disease, and Social Determinants of Health on Receipt of Nonoperative Management for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Keaton A Rummel, Christopher L Hallemeier, Zhaohui Jin, Kenneth W Merrell, Hao Xie, Kellie L Mathis, Nicholas P McKenna, Mark R Waddle, Michael G Haddock, Cameron M Callaghan, Krishan R Jethwa","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>For locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (R-ACA), a nonoperative management (NOM) approach has emerged as a guideline-supported treatment option. However, the variables associated with NOM receipt are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage 1 to 3 R-ACA managed with curative intent from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving NOM versus surgery. The secondary outcome was survival among NOM patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 128,297 patients were included. In all, 115,888 (90.3%) received surgery and 12,409 (9.7%) received NOM. Receipt of NOM was associated with age above 70, Charlson-Deyo score of 0, race (Black, Asian or Pacific Islander, or other vs. White), insurance status, geographical region, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2012-2018 vs. 2004-2011), tumor grade 1 versus ≥ 2, clinical T-stage ≥ 2, and clinical N1 or N2 versus N0. In the NOM cohort, poorer overall survival was associated with age 70 and above, male sex, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1, insurance status, geographical region, rural urban density versus metro/urban, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2004-2011 vs. 2012-2018), clinical T4 versus T1, clinical N1 or N2 versus N0, grade 3 versus 1, treatment with a radiotherapy dose <45 Gy versus 45 to 54 Gy, and omission of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several demographic factors and social determinants of health were associated with receipt of NOM and overall survival. With the increasing utilization of NOM, it will be important to understand the drivers of treatment decisions and influences on access to the desired treatment approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145114979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis, Predictive Nomogram, and the Role of Adjuvant Radiation for Survival in a Retrospective Population-based Study. 肺泡软组织肉瘤:临床病理分析、预测Nomogram和辅助放疗在一项基于人群的回顾性研究中的生存作用。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001233
Marjan Khan, Abdullah Chandasir, Rohan Kapuria, Muhammad Samsoor Zarak, Amir Humza Sohail, Asif Iqbal, Aman Goyal, Abu Baker Sheikh, Hritvik Jain, Lukman Tijani, Asad Ullah

Objectives: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare sarcoma affecting the deep soft tissues of the extremities in young adults and the head/trunk in children. This population-based study investigates demographics and factors influencing survival outcomes in ASPS.

Methods: The data for this study were collected from the SEER databases from 2000 to 2020.

Results: A total of 277 cases with ASPS were extracted from the database with a median age of 25 years and slight female predilection (52.3%). ASPS has a higher incidence in black (24.2%) and Hispanic (23.1%) races. Tumor location varied by age group: the head and neck were most commonly affected in younger patients (36.2%), while the lower extremities and hip region were predominant in older patients (68.8%). In most cases, the tumor size was >4 cm. When known, and majority were distant metastases (50.7%), and lung being the most common metastatic. The 5-year CSS with distant metastases was 33.0% (95% CI: 24.7-44.0). The highest 5-year CSS was observed with surgery with adjuvant radiation 86.7% (95% CI: 78.0-96.4). Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.22), while surgery with adjuvant radiation was significantly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.36).

Conclusions: This study found that the male sex and larger tumors predict poorer ASPS outcomes, while surgery with adjuvant radiation improves survival. Future prospective clinical trials should focus on genomic mutation analysis for a personalized therapeutic approach.

目的:肺泡软组织肉瘤(Alveolar soft part sarcoma, ASPS)是一种罕见的肉瘤,主要影响年轻人的四肢和儿童的头部/躯干的深层软组织。这项以人群为基础的研究调查了影响ASPS患者生存结果的人口统计学和因素。方法:本研究的数据收集自2000年至2020年的SEER数据库。结果:从数据库中共提取出277例ASPS患者,中位年龄25岁,女性略占优势(52.3%)。ASPS在黑人(24.2%)和西班牙裔(23.1%)种族中的发病率更高。肿瘤位置因年龄组而异:年轻患者以头颈部最常见(36.2%),而老年患者以下肢和臀部区域为主(68.8%)。多数病例肿瘤大小为40 ~ 4cm。已知时,大多数为远处转移(50.7%),肺是最常见的转移灶。伴有远处转移的5年CSS为33.0% (95% CI: 24.7-44.0)。辅助放疗的5年CSS最高,为86.7% (95% CI: 78.0 ~ 96.4)。多因素分析显示,男性与较差的生存率相关(风险比[HR] = 2.22),而辅助放疗手术与较差的生存率显著相关(HR = 0.36)。结论:本研究发现,男性和较大的肿瘤预示着较差的ASPS结果,而辅助放疗手术可提高生存率。未来的前瞻性临床试验应侧重于基因组突变分析,以获得个性化的治疗方法。
{"title":"Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis, Predictive Nomogram, and the Role of Adjuvant Radiation for Survival in a Retrospective Population-based Study.","authors":"Marjan Khan, Abdullah Chandasir, Rohan Kapuria, Muhammad Samsoor Zarak, Amir Humza Sohail, Asif Iqbal, Aman Goyal, Abu Baker Sheikh, Hritvik Jain, Lukman Tijani, Asad Ullah","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare sarcoma affecting the deep soft tissues of the extremities in young adults and the head/trunk in children. This population-based study investigates demographics and factors influencing survival outcomes in ASPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for this study were collected from the SEER databases from 2000 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 277 cases with ASPS were extracted from the database with a median age of 25 years and slight female predilection (52.3%). ASPS has a higher incidence in black (24.2%) and Hispanic (23.1%) races. Tumor location varied by age group: the head and neck were most commonly affected in younger patients (36.2%), while the lower extremities and hip region were predominant in older patients (68.8%). In most cases, the tumor size was >4 cm. When known, and majority were distant metastases (50.7%), and lung being the most common metastatic. The 5-year CSS with distant metastases was 33.0% (95% CI: 24.7-44.0). The highest 5-year CSS was observed with surgery with adjuvant radiation 86.7% (95% CI: 78.0-96.4). Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.22), while surgery with adjuvant radiation was significantly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the male sex and larger tumors predict poorer ASPS outcomes, while surgery with adjuvant radiation improves survival. Future prospective clinical trials should focus on genomic mutation analysis for a personalized therapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Phase II Trial to Assess the Evolution of the KRAS Mutation Load by Liquid Biopsy in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant NALIRIFOX. 一项通过液体活检评估可切除胰腺导管腺癌患者接受新辅助NALIRIFOX治疗时KRAS突变负荷演变的II期试验。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-10 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001253
Rafael Álvarez-Gallego, Teresa Macarulla, Berta Laquente, Paloma Peinado, Florian Castet, Cesar Muñoz, Carles Fabregat-Franco, Lisardo Ugidos, Sharela Vega, Juli Busquets, Enrique Sanz-García, Carmen Toledano, Yolanda Quijano, Emilio Vicente, Antonio Cubillo

Objectives: To evaluate the association between the KRAS mutational load and the histologic tumor response in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who received neoadjuvant treatment (NAC) with pegylated liposomal irinotecan in combination with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (NALIRIFOX).

Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm, interventional, open-label, phase 2 trial in patients 18 years or older who had histologically or cytologically confirmed PDAC and were candidates for surgery and received neoadjuvant NALIRIFOX. The primary outcome was determination of the association between the KRAS mutational load and the histologic tumor response after chemotherapy.

Results: Twenty patients were included in the study. Before initiating NAC, 11 patients were KRAS+, 6 were KRAS-, and 3 were not evaluable for KRAS mutation status. Eight of the 11 (72.7%) patients changed from KRAS+ at baseline to KRAS- after treatment, and none of the 6 (0.0%) patients changed from KRAS- at baseline to KRAS+ after treatment. A good histopathologic response after NAC was observed in 3 (15%) of the 20 patients, with a greater proportion of good responses among patients who were KRAS- (3 out of 16 [18.8%]) than among those who were KRAS+ (0 out of 1 [0.0%]) after NAC, although the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.633).

Conclusions: Our results indicate that patients with potentially resectable PDAC tend to have detectable KRAS in the blood if the disease is locally more advanced and that most patients who are treated with neoadjuvant NALIRIFOX are negative for KRAS at the end of therapy.

目的:评估接受聚乙二醇化伊立替康联合奥沙利铂、5-氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸素(NALIRIFOX)新辅助治疗(NAC)的可切除胰导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的KRAS突变负荷与组织学肿瘤反应之间的关系。方法:这是一项多中心、单臂、介入性、开放标签的2期试验,患者年龄在18岁或以上,组织学或细胞学证实为PDAC,需要手术治疗并接受新辅助NALIRIFOX。主要结果是确定KRAS突变负荷与化疗后组织学肿瘤反应之间的关系。结果:20例患者纳入研究。在开始NAC之前,11例患者为KRAS+, 6例为KRAS-, 3例无法评估KRAS突变状态。11例患者中有8例(72.7%)从基线时的KRAS+转变为治疗后的KRAS-, 6例(0.0%)患者中没有一例(0.0%)从基线时的KRAS-转变为治疗后的KRAS+。20例患者中有3例(15%)NAC后组织病理反应良好,其中KRAS-组(16例中有3例[18.8%])较KRAS+组(1例中有0例[0.0%])NAC后组织病理反应良好的比例更高,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.633)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,如果疾病局部进展较晚,可能可切除的PDAC患者血液中往往有可检测到的KRAS,并且大多数接受新辅助NALIRIFOX治疗的患者在治疗结束时KRAS呈阴性。
{"title":"A Phase II Trial to Assess the Evolution of the KRAS Mutation Load by Liquid Biopsy in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant NALIRIFOX.","authors":"Rafael Álvarez-Gallego, Teresa Macarulla, Berta Laquente, Paloma Peinado, Florian Castet, Cesar Muñoz, Carles Fabregat-Franco, Lisardo Ugidos, Sharela Vega, Juli Busquets, Enrique Sanz-García, Carmen Toledano, Yolanda Quijano, Emilio Vicente, Antonio Cubillo","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association between the KRAS mutational load and the histologic tumor response in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who received neoadjuvant treatment (NAC) with pegylated liposomal irinotecan in combination with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (NALIRIFOX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, single-arm, interventional, open-label, phase 2 trial in patients 18 years or older who had histologically or cytologically confirmed PDAC and were candidates for surgery and received neoadjuvant NALIRIFOX. The primary outcome was determination of the association between the KRAS mutational load and the histologic tumor response after chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were included in the study. Before initiating NAC, 11 patients were KRAS+, 6 were KRAS-, and 3 were not evaluable for KRAS mutation status. Eight of the 11 (72.7%) patients changed from KRAS+ at baseline to KRAS- after treatment, and none of the 6 (0.0%) patients changed from KRAS- at baseline to KRAS+ after treatment. A good histopathologic response after NAC was observed in 3 (15%) of the 20 patients, with a greater proportion of good responses among patients who were KRAS- (3 out of 16 [18.8%]) than among those who were KRAS+ (0 out of 1 [0.0%]) after NAC, although the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.633).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that patients with potentially resectable PDAC tend to have detectable KRAS in the blood if the disease is locally more advanced and that most patients who are treated with neoadjuvant NALIRIFOX are negative for KRAS at the end of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive Analysis of Conditional Survival in Radiation-treated Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies Using the SEER Database. 利用SEER数据库对放射治疗妇科恶性肿瘤患者条件生存的综合分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001254
Kuo Zhang, Jimmy S Patel, Ashley Schlafstein, Clifton Fuller, Jill Remick, Tony T Eng

Objectives: In this study, we report conditional survival rate for gynecologic malignancies using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients who have received treatment with radiation therapy.

Methods: Utilizing the SEER 22 database and SEER*Stat 8.4.3, regional gynecologic malignancies (cervix uteri, corpus uteri, vagina, vulva) treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, or both, were identified between 2000 and 2020. 5-year CS was calculated annually for each type of cancer treated with different types of therapies up to 5 years post diagnosis. The timeframes for percentages of survived patients are 12 to 72, 24 to 84, 36 to 96, 48 to 108, and 60 to 120 months, which gives the percentage of patients surviving up to 5 years at 1 to 5 years from when patients received diagnosis.

Results: There were 59,441 patients who received radiation in the initial cohort. This was further subdivided into 24,073 (40%) patients who received EBRT only, 18,528 (31%) who received brachytherapy only, and 16,840 (28%) who received combined EBRT and brachytherapy. 5-year CS was calculated each year after initial diagnosis up to 5 years after. For all types of cancers that were analyzed, the 5-year CS increased as the year after diagnosis increased.

Conclusions: CS is an effective method to prognosticate patients over time. In our cohort of patients with gynecologic malignancies treated with radiation, the overall trends for 5-year CS were similar across any treatment modality. These findings may help elucidate statistics for survivorship care and may help develop evidence-based policies.

目的:在本研究中,我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库报告接受放射治疗的妇科恶性肿瘤患者的条件生存率。方法:利用SEER 22数据库和SEER*Stat 8.4.3,对2000年至2020年间接受外束放射治疗(EBRT)、近距离放疗或两者兼有治疗的区域性妇科恶性肿瘤(宫颈、子宫体、阴道、外阴)进行分析。5年CS每年计算不同类型治疗的每种癌症的5年CS,直至诊断后5年。存活患者百分比的时间范围为12至72,24至84,36至96,48至108和60至120个月,这给出了自患者接受诊断后1至5年内存活至5年的患者百分比。结果:在最初的队列中,有59,441名患者接受了放疗。进一步细分为仅接受EBRT的24,073例(40%)患者,仅接受近距离治疗的18,528例(31%)患者,以及接受EBRT和近距离治疗联合的16,840例(28%)患者。5年CS从最初诊断后每年计算至5年后。对于所分析的所有类型的癌症,5年CS随着诊断后年份的增加而增加。结论:CS是预测患者预后的有效方法。在接受放射治疗的妇科恶性肿瘤患者队列中,5年CS的总体趋势在任何治疗方式中都是相似的。这些发现可能有助于阐明生存护理的统计数据,并可能有助于制定基于证据的政策。
{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of Conditional Survival in Radiation-treated Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies Using the SEER Database.","authors":"Kuo Zhang, Jimmy S Patel, Ashley Schlafstein, Clifton Fuller, Jill Remick, Tony T Eng","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we report conditional survival rate for gynecologic malignancies using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients who have received treatment with radiation therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the SEER 22 database and SEER*Stat 8.4.3, regional gynecologic malignancies (cervix uteri, corpus uteri, vagina, vulva) treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, or both, were identified between 2000 and 2020. 5-year CS was calculated annually for each type of cancer treated with different types of therapies up to 5 years post diagnosis. The timeframes for percentages of survived patients are 12 to 72, 24 to 84, 36 to 96, 48 to 108, and 60 to 120 months, which gives the percentage of patients surviving up to 5 years at 1 to 5 years from when patients received diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 59,441 patients who received radiation in the initial cohort. This was further subdivided into 24,073 (40%) patients who received EBRT only, 18,528 (31%) who received brachytherapy only, and 16,840 (28%) who received combined EBRT and brachytherapy. 5-year CS was calculated each year after initial diagnosis up to 5 years after. For all types of cancers that were analyzed, the 5-year CS increased as the year after diagnosis increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CS is an effective method to prognosticate patients over time. In our cohort of patients with gynecologic malignancies treated with radiation, the overall trends for 5-year CS were similar across any treatment modality. These findings may help elucidate statistics for survivorship care and may help develop evidence-based policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With a Combination of Cetuximab and Nivolumab in a Phase II Clinical Trial. 在一项II期临床试验中,西妥昔单抗和纳武单抗联合治疗复发和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率的评估
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001255
Robin Park, Fahad Rind, Tyler Kristoff, Jiannong Li, Michael Schell, Robbert J C Slebos, Sowjanya Thatikonda, Ritu Chaudhary, Maria I Biernacki, Yeva Meshkovska, David Kaldas, Hyun-Su Kim, Joaquim Farinhas, Juan Hernandez-Prera, Kedar Kirtane, MacLean S Hall, Antonio L Amelio, James W Rocco, Priyanka Bhateja, Conor Steuer, Marcelo Bonomi, Nabil F Saba, Christine H Chung

Objectives: We report on the biomarker analyses focusing on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with combined cetuximab and nivolumab.

Methods: Data were obtained from a phase II trial (NCT03370276). Peripheral blood NLR was obtained at baseline (B-NLR) and on-treatment (OT-NLR; 1 mo from treatment initiation). Tumor NLR (T-NLR) was determined by staining of immune cells in primary tumors. Patients were stratified into high (≥median) or low NLR (

Results: While B-NLR did not correlate with survival or responses, low OT-NLR was associated with superior overall survival (OS; P<0.0001), progression-free survival (PFS; P=0.0002), and overall response (P<0.001) compared with high OT-NLR. Multivariable analysis further demonstrated that low OT-NLR was associated with superior OS (HR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.17-0.61) and PFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.25-0.81). Compared with patients with high OT-NLR, a higher proportion of patients with low OT-NLR had OS≥24 months (P=0.0001). Low OT-NLR was associated with higher baseline PD-L1 combined positive scores (P=0.037). Low pretreatment T-NLR was associated with superior OS and PFS in multivariable analysis and correlated with superior overall response (P=0.011).

Conclusions: Low OT-NLR and pretreatment T-NLR correlated with superior treatment outcomes in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with cetuximab and nivolumab. Further evaluation of T-NLR to improve patient selection and peripheral blood OT-NLR as a dynamic biomarker contributing to clinical benefit assessment given cetuximab and nivolumab is warranted.

目的:我们报道了在西妥昔单抗和纳武单抗联合治疗的复发和/或转移性(R/M)头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)的生物标志物分析。方法:数据来自一项II期试验(NCT03370276)。在基线(B-NLR)和治疗(OT-NLR;治疗开始1个月)时获得外周血NLR。肿瘤NLR (T-NLR)通过免疫细胞染色测定原发肿瘤。患者被分为高(≥中位)或低NLR(结果:虽然B-NLR与生存或反应无关,但低OT-NLR与较好的总生存期(OS)相关;结论:低OT-NLR和预处理T-NLR与西妥昔单抗和纳武单抗治疗的R/M HNSCC患者的较好治疗结果相关。有必要进一步评估T-NLR,以改善患者选择和外周血T-NLR作为动态生物标志物,有助于西妥昔单抗和纳武单抗的临床益处评估。
{"title":"Evaluation of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With a Combination of Cetuximab and Nivolumab in a Phase II Clinical Trial.","authors":"Robin Park, Fahad Rind, Tyler Kristoff, Jiannong Li, Michael Schell, Robbert J C Slebos, Sowjanya Thatikonda, Ritu Chaudhary, Maria I Biernacki, Yeva Meshkovska, David Kaldas, Hyun-Su Kim, Joaquim Farinhas, Juan Hernandez-Prera, Kedar Kirtane, MacLean S Hall, Antonio L Amelio, James W Rocco, Priyanka Bhateja, Conor Steuer, Marcelo Bonomi, Nabil F Saba, Christine H Chung","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We report on the biomarker analyses focusing on neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with combined cetuximab and nivolumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from a phase II trial (NCT03370276). Peripheral blood NLR was obtained at baseline (B-NLR) and on-treatment (OT-NLR; 1 mo from treatment initiation). Tumor NLR (T-NLR) was determined by staining of immune cells in primary tumors. Patients were stratified into high (≥median) or low NLR (<median). The association between NLR with survival outcomes was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While B-NLR did not correlate with survival or responses, low OT-NLR was associated with superior overall survival (OS; P<0.0001), progression-free survival (PFS; P=0.0002), and overall response (P<0.001) compared with high OT-NLR. Multivariable analysis further demonstrated that low OT-NLR was associated with superior OS (HR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.17-0.61) and PFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.25-0.81). Compared with patients with high OT-NLR, a higher proportion of patients with low OT-NLR had OS≥24 months (P=0.0001). Low OT-NLR was associated with higher baseline PD-L1 combined positive scores (P=0.037). Low pretreatment T-NLR was associated with superior OS and PFS in multivariable analysis and correlated with superior overall response (P=0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low OT-NLR and pretreatment T-NLR correlated with superior treatment outcomes in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with cetuximab and nivolumab. Further evaluation of T-NLR to improve patient selection and peripheral blood OT-NLR as a dynamic biomarker contributing to clinical benefit assessment given cetuximab and nivolumab is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Camrelizumab联合阿帕替尼治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001247
Ahmed Raza, Fnu Kalpina, Mudasar Nisar, Muhammad Saffi Ullah, Faiza Fatima, Zain Sadiq, Mahnoor Fatima, Zaheer Qureshi

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a major global health burden with limited treatment options. Combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic agents has shown promise. Camrelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, and apatinib, a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, offer synergistic effects, improving outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception till May 2025. Nine studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab plus apatinib were included. Analysis was conducted on R Studio v4.5.0. Pooled estimates were reported as proportions and 95% CI using a random effect model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I². Subgroup analysis was based on treatment exposure. The pooled 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 71%, with treatment-naive patients exhibiting a statistically higher 1-year OS of 95% compared with 55% in pretreated patients. One-year progression-free survival was 25%. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the treatment-naive group than in the previously treated group (87% vs. 28%). Previously treated patients showed a modest complete response rate (CRR) of 1%, while treatment-naive patients showed a significantly higher CRR of 22%. Partial response rate was significantly higher in the treatment-naive subgroup (64% vs. 26%). Hemangioma was the significant adverse event in the treatment-naive subgroup (47% vs. 12%). Rates of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were comparable between the 2 subgroups. Camrelizumab plus apatinib has shown promising efficacy with improved OS, PFS, and response rates. Large-scale trials are warranted to validate these findings and optimize treatment strategies.

食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)是全球主要的健康负担,治疗选择有限。将免疫疗法与抗血管生成药物相结合已显示出前景。Camrelizumab(一种PD-1抑制剂)和apatinib(一种VEGFR-2抑制剂)提供协同效应,改善晚期或转移性ESCC患者的预后。从成立到2025年5月,在PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Scopus和clinicaltrials.gov上进行了文献检索。9项研究评估了camrelizumab联合阿帕替尼的安全性和有效性。在R Studio v4.5.0上进行分析。使用随机效应模型将汇总估计值报告为比例和95% CI。使用I²评估统计异质性。亚组分析基于治疗暴露。合并的1年总生存率(OS)为71%,未接受治疗的患者的1年生存率为95%,而未接受治疗的患者为55%。一年无进展生存率为25%。首次治疗组的总有效率明显高于先前治疗组(87%对28%)。先前接受治疗的患者的完全缓解率(CRR)为1%,而首次接受治疗的患者的完全缓解率(CRR)明显更高,为22%。首次治疗亚组的部分缓解率明显更高(64% vs. 26%)。在未接受治疗的亚组中,血管瘤是显著的不良事件(47%对12%)。两个亚组之间白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、贫血和血小板减少的发生率具有可比性。Camrelizumab联合阿帕替尼显示出有希望的疗效,改善了OS, PFS和反应率。有必要进行大规模试验来验证这些发现并优化治疗策略。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmed Raza, Fnu Kalpina, Mudasar Nisar, Muhammad Saffi Ullah, Faiza Fatima, Zain Sadiq, Mahnoor Fatima, Zaheer Qureshi","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001247","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a major global health burden with limited treatment options. Combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic agents has shown promise. Camrelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, and apatinib, a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, offer synergistic effects, improving outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception till May 2025. Nine studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab plus apatinib were included. Analysis was conducted on R Studio v4.5.0. Pooled estimates were reported as proportions and 95% CI using a random effect model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I². Subgroup analysis was based on treatment exposure. The pooled 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 71%, with treatment-naive patients exhibiting a statistically higher 1-year OS of 95% compared with 55% in pretreated patients. One-year progression-free survival was 25%. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the treatment-naive group than in the previously treated group (87% vs. 28%). Previously treated patients showed a modest complete response rate (CRR) of 1%, while treatment-naive patients showed a significantly higher CRR of 22%. Partial response rate was significantly higher in the treatment-naive subgroup (64% vs. 26%). Hemangioma was the significant adverse event in the treatment-naive subgroup (47% vs. 12%). Rates of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were comparable between the 2 subgroups. Camrelizumab plus apatinib has shown promising efficacy with improved OS, PFS, and response rates. Large-scale trials are warranted to validate these findings and optimize treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors and Patterns of Recurrence in Vulvar Cancer. 外阴癌复发的预测因素和模式。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001200
Francesca De Maria, Francesco Raspagliesi, Vito Chiantera, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Simone Bruni, Camilla Valsecchi, Ilaria Cuccu, Valentina Chiappa, Fabio Ghezzi, Giovanni Scambia, Jvan Casarin, Giorgio Bogani

Objective: To identify prognostic factors predicting recurrence in vulvar cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from consecutive patients with vulvar cancer treated between 2002 and 2024 in 2 Italian centers. Basic descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were used to create predictive models for patient outcomes. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: The study included 283 patients diagnosed with vulvar cancer (239 with squamous cell carcinoma). The most frequent stages were stage I (50.9%) and stage III (30.4%). After a median follow-up of 27 months, 91 (32.2%) recurrences were observed, of which 20% were local, 6% were regional, and 6% were distant. The five-year DFS and OS were 46% and 60%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the presence of positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-12.08), age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1-1.04), FIGO stage II (HR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.24-7.87), and FIGO stage IV (HR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.19-12.43) as factors associated with worse DFS. Positive nodes (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.2-5.8) and tumor diameter >4 cm (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.05-3.42) were associated with OS. FIGO stage >I was predictive of regional and distant recurrences, but no factor was found to correlate with local recurrence.

Conclusions: FIGO stage >I was predictive of regional and distant recurrences, while no factors influencing local recurrence were identified. Positive nodes, age, and FIGO stage >I correlated with DFS, whereas tumor diameter >4 cm and positive nodes influenced OS.

目的:探讨外阴癌手术后复发的影响因素。方法:我们回顾性评估2002年至2024年在意大利2个中心连续治疗的外阴癌患者的数据。使用基本描述性统计和多变量分析来创建患者预后的预测模型。采用Cox比例风险模型分析5年无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:本研究纳入283例外阴癌患者(其中239例为鳞状细胞癌)。最常见的是I期(50.9%)和III期(30.4%)。中位随访27个月后,91例(32.2%)复发,其中20%为局部复发,6%为局部复发,6%为远处复发。5年DFS和OS分别为46%和60%。多因素分析发现淋巴结阳性(风险比[HR]: 3.54, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.04-12.08)、年龄(HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1-1.04)、FIGO II期(HR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.24-7.87)和FIGO IV期(HR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.19-12.43)是与DFS恶化相关的因素。阳性淋巴结(HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.2-5.8)和肿瘤直径bbb4cm (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.05-3.42)与OS相关。FIGO分期>I可预测局部和远处复发,但未发现与局部复发相关的因素。结论:FIGO分期>可预测局部和远处复发,未发现影响局部复发的因素。阳性淋巴结、年龄和FIGO分期>I与DFS相关,而肿瘤直径>4 cm和阳性淋巴结影响OS。
{"title":"Predictors and Patterns of Recurrence in Vulvar Cancer.","authors":"Francesca De Maria, Francesco Raspagliesi, Vito Chiantera, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Simone Bruni, Camilla Valsecchi, Ilaria Cuccu, Valentina Chiappa, Fabio Ghezzi, Giovanni Scambia, Jvan Casarin, Giorgio Bogani","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001200","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify prognostic factors predicting recurrence in vulvar cancer patients undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated data from consecutive patients with vulvar cancer treated between 2002 and 2024 in 2 Italian centers. Basic descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were used to create predictive models for patient outcomes. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 283 patients diagnosed with vulvar cancer (239 with squamous cell carcinoma). The most frequent stages were stage I (50.9%) and stage III (30.4%). After a median follow-up of 27 months, 91 (32.2%) recurrences were observed, of which 20% were local, 6% were regional, and 6% were distant. The five-year DFS and OS were 46% and 60%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the presence of positive lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-12.08), age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1-1.04), FIGO stage II (HR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.24-7.87), and FIGO stage IV (HR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.19-12.43) as factors associated with worse DFS. Positive nodes (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.2-5.8) and tumor diameter >4 cm (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.05-3.42) were associated with OS. FIGO stage >I was predictive of regional and distant recurrences, but no factor was found to correlate with local recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIGO stage >I was predictive of regional and distant recurrences, while no factors influencing local recurrence were identified. Positive nodes, age, and FIGO stage >I correlated with DFS, whereas tumor diameter >4 cm and positive nodes influenced OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"435-442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144038129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Location and Delivery of Palliative Radiotherapy. 种族和民族对姑息性放疗的位置和递送的影响。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001202
Anthony K Heng, Ted Gooley, Simon S Lo, Jonathan T Yang, Erin F Gillespie, Lia M Halasz, Yolanda D Tseng

Objectives: Among patients that underwent palliative RT (pRT) at a single institution, we evaluated whether differences exist across race and ethnicity in location of pRT consultation and delivery of pRT.

Methods: This retrospective study included cancer patients aged 18 years or older who received pRT between 10/2021 and 10/2022. Logistic regression models were used to examine univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) associations between race and pRT consult in the inpatient (vs. outpatient) setting. A subset analysis of quality metrics for pRT delivery was limited to patients who had outpatient consults for pain.

Results: Four hundred forty patients underwent 548 pRT consults (104 inpatient and 444 outpatient) followed by a course of pRT. Most patients were male (58.2%), White non-Hispanic (WNH) (72.6%), and English-speaking (92.9%). On MVA adjusting for histology, language, and insurance type, consults for Black/African American (BAA) patients had 2.92 higher odds of being performed in the inpatient setting compared with consults for WNH patients (95% CI: 1.28-6.70, P =0.011), although the global P -value was P =0.217. Among 290 outpatient consults for painful lesions, no differences in time to pRT start (global P =0.84), number of prescribed fractions of RT (global P =0.94), or new prescriptions for opioids (global P =0.69) were noted by race and ethnicity.

Conclusions: In this study, BAA race was associated with the location of pRT consultation, but no discernible differences were noted regarding the outpatient delivery of pRT for pain. These findings support the importance of inpatient pRT programs to ensure equitable access. More research is needed to understand barriers to outpatient consult.

目的:在单一机构接受姑息性放射治疗(pRT)的患者中,我们评估在pRT咨询和提供pRT的地点是否存在种族和民族差异。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2021年10月至2022年10月期间接受pRT治疗的18岁及以上的癌症患者。采用Logistic回归模型检验住院患者(与门诊患者相比)种族与pRT会诊之间的单变量(UVA)和多变量(MVA)关联。pRT交付质量指标的子集分析仅限于因疼痛而门诊就诊的患者。结果:440例患者接受了548次pRT咨询(104例住院,444例门诊),并进行了一个疗程的pRT治疗。大多数患者为男性(58.2%),非西班牙裔白人(WNH)(72.6%)和英语(92.9%)。在调整组织学、语言和保险类型的MVA后,与WNH患者相比,黑人/非裔美国人(BAA)患者在住院环境中接受手术的几率高出2.92 (95% CI: 1.28-6.70, P=0.011),尽管总体P值为P=0.217。在290名因疼痛病变就诊的门诊患者中,种族和民族在开始pRT的时间(总体P=0.84)、RT处方分数(总体P=0.94)或阿片类药物新处方(总体P=0.69)方面没有差异。结论:在本研究中,BAA种族与pRT咨询的地点有关,但在门诊提供pRT治疗疼痛方面没有明显差异。这些发现支持了住院pRT项目对确保公平获取的重要性。需要更多的研究来了解门诊咨询的障碍。
{"title":"The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Location and Delivery of Palliative Radiotherapy.","authors":"Anthony K Heng, Ted Gooley, Simon S Lo, Jonathan T Yang, Erin F Gillespie, Lia M Halasz, Yolanda D Tseng","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001202","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Among patients that underwent palliative RT (pRT) at a single institution, we evaluated whether differences exist across race and ethnicity in location of pRT consultation and delivery of pRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included cancer patients aged 18 years or older who received pRT between 10/2021 and 10/2022. Logistic regression models were used to examine univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) associations between race and pRT consult in the inpatient (vs. outpatient) setting. A subset analysis of quality metrics for pRT delivery was limited to patients who had outpatient consults for pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred forty patients underwent 548 pRT consults (104 inpatient and 444 outpatient) followed by a course of pRT. Most patients were male (58.2%), White non-Hispanic (WNH) (72.6%), and English-speaking (92.9%). On MVA adjusting for histology, language, and insurance type, consults for Black/African American (BAA) patients had 2.92 higher odds of being performed in the inpatient setting compared with consults for WNH patients (95% CI: 1.28-6.70, P =0.011), although the global P -value was P =0.217. Among 290 outpatient consults for painful lesions, no differences in time to pRT start (global P =0.84), number of prescribed fractions of RT (global P =0.94), or new prescriptions for opioids (global P =0.69) were noted by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, BAA race was associated with the location of pRT consultation, but no discernible differences were noted regarding the outpatient delivery of pRT for pain. These findings support the importance of inpatient pRT programs to ensure equitable access. More research is needed to understand barriers to outpatient consult.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"429-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144054912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breast Cancer Patient Treatment Experience at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center Before Formal Navigation Integration. 在正式导航整合之前,乳腺癌患者在国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心的治疗经验。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-14 DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001231
Kolton Kardokus, Kerry A Stark, Anh B Lam, Shearwood McClelland

Objectives: Breast cancer accounted for over 1/3 of new US cancer diagnoses in 2024, remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally, and is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. We evaluated breast cancer patient experience at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center to assess potential barriers to optimal care.

Methods: Over a 10-month period (4/1/24 to 1/31/25), eligible breast cancer patients identified in clinic visits and who self-reported diagnoses were surveyed about their experience. Each survey included a "Likelihood to Recommend" (LTR) question, scored on a 5-point Likert scale, as a proxy for satisfaction. We examined surveys from 2 service lines: medical practice (clinic visits) and outpatient oncology (radiation/infusion). We extracted demographic data from the electronic medical record. Underrepresented minorities (URMs) were defined as African American, Native American, and/or Hispanic patients. Fisher's exact test assessed differences by race and ethnicity ( P <0.05).

Results: Of 15,153 patients (76.5% White, 9.9% Black, 7.6% Native American, and 94.3% non-Hispanic), 2,066 patients (13.6% response rate) completed the surveys. Response rates were significantly higher among White/non-Hispanic patients compared with URMs ( P =0.0001). For outpatient oncology, patient experiences did not significantly differ by race or ethnicity. For medical practice, a trend toward significance was observed by ethnicity ( P =0.07), but not by race.

Conclusions: Our retrospective cohort study found significantly lower survey response rates among URMs, which could indicate barriers to sharing patient experiences. These findings establish a baseline for comparison and support future implementation of targeted navigation programs to improve patient experience and care delivery.

2024年,乳腺癌占美国新癌症诊断的三分之一以上,仍然是全球最常见的癌症,也是女性癌症相关死亡的主要原因。我们评估了乳腺癌患者在国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心的经历,以评估最佳护理的潜在障碍。方法:在10个月的时间里(4/1/24至1/31/25),对在门诊确诊并自我报告诊断的符合条件的乳腺癌患者的经历进行调查。每项调查都包括一个“推荐可能性”(LTR)问题,以5分的李克特量表得分,作为满意度的代表。我们检查了来自两个服务线的调查:医疗实践(门诊就诊)和门诊肿瘤学(放射/输注)。我们从电子病历中提取了人口统计数据。未被充分代表的少数群体(urm)被定义为非洲裔美国人、美洲原住民和/或西班牙裔患者。Fisher的精确检验评估了种族和民族的差异(结果:15153名患者(76.5%白人,9.9%黑人,7.6%美洲原住民和94.3%非西班牙裔),2066名患者(13.6%的有效率)完成了调查。与URMs相比,白人/非西班牙裔患者的缓解率明显更高(P=0.0001)。对于门诊肿瘤学,患者的经验没有显著差异的种族或民族。在医疗实践中,种族差异有显著性趋势(P=0.07),但种族差异无显著性趋势。结论:我们的回顾性队列研究发现urm的调查回复率明显较低,这可能表明分享患者经验存在障碍。这些发现为比较建立了基线,并支持未来实施有针对性的导航计划,以改善患者体验和护理服务。
{"title":"Breast Cancer Patient Treatment Experience at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center Before Formal Navigation Integration.","authors":"Kolton Kardokus, Kerry A Stark, Anh B Lam, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001231","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast cancer accounted for over 1/3 of new US cancer diagnoses in 2024, remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally, and is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. We evaluated breast cancer patient experience at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center to assess potential barriers to optimal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 10-month period (4/1/24 to 1/31/25), eligible breast cancer patients identified in clinic visits and who self-reported diagnoses were surveyed about their experience. Each survey included a \"Likelihood to Recommend\" (LTR) question, scored on a 5-point Likert scale, as a proxy for satisfaction. We examined surveys from 2 service lines: medical practice (clinic visits) and outpatient oncology (radiation/infusion). We extracted demographic data from the electronic medical record. Underrepresented minorities (URMs) were defined as African American, Native American, and/or Hispanic patients. Fisher's exact test assessed differences by race and ethnicity ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 15,153 patients (76.5% White, 9.9% Black, 7.6% Native American, and 94.3% non-Hispanic), 2,066 patients (13.6% response rate) completed the surveys. Response rates were significantly higher among White/non-Hispanic patients compared with URMs ( P =0.0001). For outpatient oncology, patient experiences did not significantly differ by race or ethnicity. For medical practice, a trend toward significance was observed by ethnicity ( P =0.07), but not by race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective cohort study found significantly lower survey response rates among URMs, which could indicate barriers to sharing patient experiences. These findings establish a baseline for comparison and support future implementation of targeted navigation programs to improve patient experience and care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"458-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144627668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1