American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials最新文献

Objectives: Left-sided colon cancer (LSCC) and right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) have shown distinct clinical and prognostic features. We investigated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on cause-specific survival (CSS) in patients with stage II LSCC and RSCC.

Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, a cohort of patients with stage II colon cancer, aged between 20 and 49 years was identified. Both Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis as well as propensity score matching were used.

Results: Overall, 5633 patients were eligible. Patients with RSCC were more likely to be male, black, and younger, with a poor grade and histologic type, and were more likely to have more regional nodes examined and larger tumor size. After propensity score matching, CSS was significantly superior in patients with RSCC compared to those with LSCC (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.95, P =0.01). However, no survival benefit was observed for patients with LSCC after ACT (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.90-1.35, P =0.35), and surprisingly, ACT was found to do more harm than good in patients with RSCC (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05-1.63, P =0.02). Even among patients with high-risk features such as T4 stage and regional nodes examined<12 in both groups, ACT still did not improve CSS except for T4 stage LSCC (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.97, P =0.02).

Conclusions: The results of this analysis indicate that the prognosis of RSCC is better than that of LSCC in stage II colon cancer, and ACT did not improve CSS in patients with either LSCC or RSCC. Even in patients with parts of high-risk features, ACT still did not improve CSS, except for T4 stage LSCC.

Objectives: This study aims to examine the treatment outcomes and related factors in locally advanced sinonasal cancer across Turkiye.

Methods: Twelve centers participants of the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Head and Neck Study Group attended the study. One hundred and ninety-four patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late toxicity were recorded per Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0.

Results: The median age was 58 years and 70% were male. The majority of tumors were located in maxillary sinus (59%). Most of the patients (%83) had T3 and T4A disease. Fifty-three percent of patients were in stage 4A. Radiotherapy was administered to 80% of the patients in the adjuvant settings. Median 66 Gy dose was administered in median 31 fractions. Chemotherapy was administered concomitantly with radiotherapy in 45% of the patients mostly with weekly cisplatin. No grade ≥4 acute and late toxicity was observed. The median follow-up was 43 months. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS); locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS); distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61% and 47%; 69% and 61%; 72%, and 69%, and 56% and 49%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, several factors demonstrated significant influence on OS, such as performance status, surgery, and lymph node involvement. Moreover, surgery was the key prognostic factor for LRFS. For DMFS, lymph node involvement and surgical margin were found to be influential factors. In addition, performance status and lymph node involvement were identified as significantly affecting PFS.

Conclusions: In our study, the authors obtained promising results with IMRT. Performance status, lymph node involvement, and surgery emerged as the primary factors significantly influencing OS.

With the global incidence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on the rise, the development of innovative treatment strategies is increasingly vital. This review underscores the pivotal role of precision medicine in transforming NSCLC management, particularly through the integration of genomic and epigenomic insights to enhance treatment outcomes for patients. We focus on the identification of key gene mutations and examine the evolution and impact of targeted therapies. These therapies have shown encouraging results in improving survival rates and quality of life. Despite numerous gene mutations being identified in association with NSCLC, targeted treatments are available for only a select few. This paper offers an exhaustive analysis of the pathogenesis of NSCLC and reviews the latest advancements in targeted therapeutic approaches. It emphasizes the ongoing necessity for research and development in this domain. In addition, we discuss the current challenges faced in the clinical application of these therapies and the potential directions for future research, including the identification of novel targets and the development of new treatment modalities.

Objectives: Androgen receptor-targeted therapies (ARTs) improve survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); however, a significant portion of patients discontinue treatment for various reasons including treatment-related toxicity. We aim to describe reasons for ART treatment discontinuation and identify predictors associated with increased risk of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity.

Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients with mCRPC receiving ART between 2010 and 2021. Our primary aim was to identify risk factors for treatment discontinuation due to toxicity. Our secondary aim was to describe ART discontinuation patterns among patients with mCRPC.

Results: One hundred thirty-three patients with mCRPC started and discontinued ARTs. Fourteen patients (10.5%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Common reasons for treatment discontinuation include Prostate Specific Antigen test progression, radiographic progression, toxicity, and death. Significant predictors of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity on bivariate analysis and multivariate analysis included patient-reported falls (odds ratio [OR]: 7.67, CI: [1.31-40.42]; P =0.016), rash (OR: 13.4, CI: [1.35-134.81]; P =0.026), and weakness (OR: 4.16, CI: [1.15-15.0]; P =0.019).

Conclusions: Our work presents the first description of ART treatment discontinuation and its causes in the real-world setting, as well as patient-reported side effects. Most patients with mCRPC discontinued treatment due to the progression of disease and a minority of patients discontinued secondary to treatment toxicity. Initial multivariable analysis suggests that patient-reported weakness, falls, and rash were associated with a higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity. Early monitoring of this population can prolong the duration of treatment and prevent unnecessary treatment burden.

Objectives: Spinal metastases are common in metastatic cancer, affecting around 40% of patients. The primary treatment involves radiation therapy, transitioning from conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for its superior, durable response. While spine SBRT has gained popularity in the United States, Level I evidence supporting it over EBRT is limited to a Canadian trial using a 2-fraction SBRT regimen. We present our findings from one of the earliest US experiences of 2-fraction spine SBRT for spinal metastases.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic spine cancer receiving 2-fraction spine SBRT at a single center was conducted. Patients received treatment based on Level 1 evidence (24 Gy in 2 fractions). Follow-up records were assessed for local control outcomes and toxicity.

Results: Twenty patients since August 2022 have been treated with 2-fraction spine SBRT. Most patients were treated at 1 (45%) or 2 (40%) spinal levels, with the thoracic (55%) and lumbar (50%) spine being the most common locations. Common primary sites included the lung (30%), breast (20%), esophagus (15%), and prostate (10%). The rate of local control was 100%, while the rate of vertebral compression fracture was 15%. No esophageal or bowel toxicity occurred, and no fractures required intervention.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that 2-fraction spine SBRT is safe and effective, consistent with existing Level I evidence. Our local control rate exceeding 95% aligns with the literature, indicating the feasibility and achievability of implementing this approach in the United States over a short period of time.

Objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal adult central nervous system tumor. Due to its high heterogeneity, the survival rate and prognosis of patients are poor. Thousands of people die of this disease every year all over the world. At present, the treatment of GBM is mainly through surgical resection and the combination of later drugs, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. An abnormal redox system is involved in the malignant progression and treatment tolerance of glioma, which is the main reason for poor survival and prognosis. The construction of a GBM redox-related prognostic model may be helpful in improving the redox immunotherapy and prognosis of GBM.

Methods: Based on glioma transcriptome data and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, databases, a risk model of redox genes was constructed by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. The good prediction performance of the model was verified by the internal validation set of The Cancer Genome Atlas, and the external data of Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas.

Results: The results confirmed that the higher the risk score, the worse the survival of patients. Age and isocitrate dehydrogenase status were significantly correlated with risk scores. The analysis of immune infiltration and immunotherapy found that there were significant differences in the immune score, matrix score, and ESTIMATE score between high and low-risk groups. reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical staining of glioma samples confirmed the expression of the hub gene.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that the 5 oxidative-related genes nitricoxidesynthase3 , NCF2 , VASN , FKBP1B , and TXNDC2 are hub genes, which may provide a reliable prognostic tool for glioma clinical treatment.

Background: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as anticancer therapy across a variety of malignancies has led to durable efficacy in a subset of patients. However, associated side effects denoted immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have emerged and can result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Particularly early in the experience of using these agents, a lack of standardized education regarding irAEs among patients and clinical providers may have contributed to poor outcomes. Optimal management of these emerging toxicities depends on a coordinated institutional approach. We hypothesized that centralized educational programs and electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions, targeted both toward ICI-treated patients as well as patient-interfacing providers, would improve patient outcomes.

Methods: We created a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and associated staff to direct a coordinated approach to the education and management of patients receiving ICIs across our institution. A 3-tiered approach was designed: patient-centered, internally centered, and externally centered. Multimedia educational products were produced for patients to improve knowledge and awareness of ICIs and associated irAEs. An EHR-based banner was deployed to improve identification of patients receiving ICIs across disciplines. Tailored educational seminars were provided to clinicians who interact with ICI-treated patients at all levels. Educational seminars were also offered to local physicians and institutions. We assessed patient uptake of educational products and surrogate patient outcomes to measure the potential impact of our interventions.

Results: Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC)-specific ICI identification cards were created and distributed to patients. By the end of the investigational period, 98.6% of ICI-treated patients reported receiving a card. An ICI-focused on-line portal was created accessible only to ICI-treated patients, with 9.4% of these patients accessing the portal in the first 6 months without marketing promotion. Deidentified surrogate clinical endpoints of corticosteroid use, direct referral unit (DRU) visits, and hospital admissions all improved during the study period.

Conclusions: Institutionally directed educational initiatives are feasible at a free-standing academic cancer center and may lead to improved outcomes in patients developing irAEs from ICIs. More granular patient-specific data and studies at other types of institutions are necessary to determine the applicability of similar approaches on a broader scale.

Background: In 2011, immunotherapy and targeted therapy revolutionized melanoma treatment. However, inequities in their use may limit the benefits seen by certain patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients in the National Cancer Database for patients with stage IV melanoma from 2 time periods: 2004-2010 and 2016-2020, distinguishing between those who received systemic therapy and those who did not. We investigated the rates and factors associated with treatment omission. We employed Kaplan-Meier analysis to explore the impact of treatment on overall survival.

Results: A total of 19,961 patients met the inclusion criteria: 7621 patients were diagnosed in 2004-2010 and 12,340 patients in 2016-2020, of whom 54.9% and 28.3% did not receive systemic treatment, respectively. The rate of "no treatment" has decreased to a plateau of ∼25% in 2020. Median overall survival was improved with treatment in both time periods (2004-2010: 8.8 vs. 5.6 mo [ P <0.05]; and 2016-2020: 25.9 vs. 4.3 mo [ P <0.05]). Nonmedical factors associated with the omission of treatment in both periods included low socioeconomic status, Medicaid or no health insurance, and treatment at low-volume centers. In the period from 2016 to 2020, patients treated at nonacademic programs were also less likely to receive treatment.

Conclusions: Systemic therapies significantly improve survival for patients with metastatic melanoma, but significant disparities exist with their receipt. Local efforts are needed to ensure all patients benefit from these revolutionary treatments.

Background: No consensus exists on the maximum dose delivered to the planning target volume (PTV) in the delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancer. We investigated whether higher biologically effective doses (BED) within the PTV were associated with improved tumor control.

Methods: We reviewed patients with early-stage, node-negative nonsmall cell lung cancer who received curative-intent SBRT between 2005 and 2018. We calculated the maximum BED (maxBED) within the PTV for all patients, analyzing outcomes using the cumulative incidence method and Fine-Gray test statistics to assess prognostic impact.

Results: We analyzed 171 patients (median age, 70.2; range, 43 to 90 y) with 181 lung nodules. Median follow-up was 2.7 years (range, 0.1 to 12 y) for all patients and 4.2 years (range, 0.2 to 8.4 y) for living patients. Median maximum tumor diameter was 1.9 cm (range, 0.7 to 5.6 cm). Patients received a prescription of 48 or 50 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions, respectively, except for one who received 60 Gy in 5 fractions. Median maxBED was 120 Gy (range, 101 to 171 Gy). There was no difference in the 3-year local control (LC) rate among patients treated with a maxBED<120 Gy versus ≥120 Gy ( P =0.83).

Conclusions: No significant differences in LC were observed between patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with SBRT in 4 or 5 fractions with a maxBED≥120 Gy. However, a higher maxBED trended toward improved LC rates, suggesting a maxBED threshold greater than 120 Gy may be needed to improve LC rates.