Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001256
{"title":"Proceedings of the American Radium Society® 107th Annual Meeting.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001256","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001256","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"S40-S43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145245822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-05-22DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001216
Asher C Park, Shravan Asthana, Abhinav Talwar, Kirsten Burdett, Laila Gharzai, Urjeet Patel, Sandeep Samant, Katelyn O Stepan
Objectives: To investigate the association between social determinants of health, as measured by the social vulnerability index (SVI), with outcomes in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).
Methods: This study included patients from Illinois with HPV-OPSCC from 2007 to 2022. State-level SVI measured neighborhood-level disadvantage and associations between SVI and clinicodemographic factors, clinical presentation, and outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression for advanced preliminary staging, while survival and recurrence were assessed within the framework of a Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: Higher overall (high vulnerability) and racial-ethnicity SVI scores were significantly associated with increased odds of advanced clinical staging (OR=1.12, P =0.041; OR=1.16, P =0.026) on univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis showed that minority race was significantly associated with advanced clinical staging (OR=5.50, P <0.001). Overall survival was significantly associated with insurance payer type and age, where Medicaid/uninsured status had higher mortality compared with Medicare in both the univariable and multivariable setting (HR=4.47, P =0.006; HR=7.93, P =0.019). The same held for age, where increased age at diagnosis was significantly associated with higher mortality (HR=1.07, P <0.001; HR=1.10, P <0.001). Recurrence-free survival was significantly associated with age (HR=1.04, P =0.004) and payer type, with Medicaid/uninsured patients having 4 times the hazard of patients with Medicare (HR=4.16, P =0.009).
Conclusions: Higher overall and racial ethnicity SVI may be associated with advanced clinical staging upon presentation. Individual factors such as race, age, and insurance status are significantly associated with patient prognosis.
{"title":"Statewide Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Asher C Park, Shravan Asthana, Abhinav Talwar, Kirsten Burdett, Laila Gharzai, Urjeet Patel, Sandeep Samant, Katelyn O Stepan","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001216","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the association between social determinants of health, as measured by the social vulnerability index (SVI), with outcomes in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients from Illinois with HPV-OPSCC from 2007 to 2022. State-level SVI measured neighborhood-level disadvantage and associations between SVI and clinicodemographic factors, clinical presentation, and outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression for advanced preliminary staging, while survival and recurrence were assessed within the framework of a Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher overall (high vulnerability) and racial-ethnicity SVI scores were significantly associated with increased odds of advanced clinical staging (OR=1.12, P =0.041; OR=1.16, P =0.026) on univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis showed that minority race was significantly associated with advanced clinical staging (OR=5.50, P <0.001). Overall survival was significantly associated with insurance payer type and age, where Medicaid/uninsured status had higher mortality compared with Medicare in both the univariable and multivariable setting (HR=4.47, P =0.006; HR=7.93, P =0.019). The same held for age, where increased age at diagnosis was significantly associated with higher mortality (HR=1.07, P <0.001; HR=1.10, P <0.001). Recurrence-free survival was significantly associated with age (HR=1.04, P =0.004) and payer type, with Medicaid/uninsured patients having 4 times the hazard of patients with Medicare (HR=4.16, P =0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher overall and racial ethnicity SVI may be associated with advanced clinical staging upon presentation. Individual factors such as race, age, and insurance status are significantly associated with patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"540-547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144121456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001250
Steven D Wren, Linda Chen, Yao Yu, Achraf Shamseddine, Amir H Safavi, Sean M McBride, Daphna Gelblum, Nadeem Riaz, Nancy Y Lee, Vaios Hatzoglou, Kaveh Zakeri
Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharynx cancer (OPC) requires accurate staging to guide treatment and de-escalation clinical trial enrollment. MRI provides superior soft tissue contrast and assessment of tumor depth of invasion compared with CT with contrast and FDG-PET/CT. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of HPV-associated OPC tumor upstaging and newly identified retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastases with MRI.
Methods: Fifty consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated HPV-associated OPC planned for treatment with primary radiotherapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from March 04, 2024, to July 09, 2024, were included. All had histologic confirmation of p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor staging and nodal assessment were independently completed by a radiation oncologist and a diagnostic neuroradiologist according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. MRI findings were compared with CT with contrast and FDG-PET/CT.
Results: The median patient age was 65, 84% were male, and 80% had <10 pack years of smoking history. Primary tumor sites included the base of tongue (50%), tonsil (48%), and glossotonsillar sulcus (2%). The rate of tumor upstaging with MRI was 12% (6/50), all 6 cases upstaged from T2 or T3 to T4. MRI identified RPLN metastases in 10% (5/50) of cases not identified on CT or PET/CT. Overall, 18% (9/50) of patients had either primary tumor upstaging or newly identified RPLN metastases based on MRI.
Conclusions: MRI leads to meaningful changes in tumor stage and RPLN detection in HPV-associated OPC. Staging MRI should be incorporated into treatment planning and de-escalation clinical trial enrollment.
{"title":"Tumor Upstaging With MRI for HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer: Implications for De-Escalation Trials.","authors":"Steven D Wren, Linda Chen, Yao Yu, Achraf Shamseddine, Amir H Safavi, Sean M McBride, Daphna Gelblum, Nadeem Riaz, Nancy Y Lee, Vaios Hatzoglou, Kaveh Zakeri","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001250","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharynx cancer (OPC) requires accurate staging to guide treatment and de-escalation clinical trial enrollment. MRI provides superior soft tissue contrast and assessment of tumor depth of invasion compared with CT with contrast and FDG-PET/CT. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of HPV-associated OPC tumor upstaging and newly identified retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastases with MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated HPV-associated OPC planned for treatment with primary radiotherapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from March 04, 2024, to July 09, 2024, were included. All had histologic confirmation of p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor staging and nodal assessment were independently completed by a radiation oncologist and a diagnostic neuroradiologist according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. MRI findings were compared with CT with contrast and FDG-PET/CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 65, 84% were male, and 80% had <10 pack years of smoking history. Primary tumor sites included the base of tongue (50%), tonsil (48%), and glossotonsillar sulcus (2%). The rate of tumor upstaging with MRI was 12% (6/50), all 6 cases upstaged from T2 or T3 to T4. MRI identified RPLN metastases in 10% (5/50) of cases not identified on CT or PET/CT. Overall, 18% (9/50) of patients had either primary tumor upstaging or newly identified RPLN metastases based on MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRI leads to meaningful changes in tumor stage and RPLN detection in HPV-associated OPC. Staging MRI should be incorporated into treatment planning and de-escalation clinical trial enrollment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"556-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144976821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-06-09DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001218
Jennifer S Chiang, Jennifer Hall, Sara Richter, Scott Jackson, Vera Qu, Erqi Pollom, Beth M Beadle
Objectives: A survey was conducted to evaluate perceptions, use, and information sources of medical cannabis (MC) among patients with head and neck cancer and identify opportunities for providers to clarify its use.
Methods: Two hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients with head and neck cancer seen in the radiation oncology department at a single institution in CA (October 2022 to June 2023; November 2023 to January 2024) were screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Surveys were emailed. Demographic/clinical data were collected and recorded from the electronic health record and surveys, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, metastatic status, COVID-19 vaccination status, substance use history, relationship and employment status, and education level. Associations between clinical/socioeconomic factors and perception/use of MC were analyzed using χ 2 tests.
Results: Of 258 eligible patients, 122 completed the survey. Most reported reliance on the internet for MC information (70%); only 20% reported consulting with their cancer treatment team. Most (75%) agreed MC can help reduce cancer-related symptoms. Some agreed or were neutral regarding the potential of MC to cure cancer (37%) or prolong life (61%). Overall, 61% of patients reported having used MC, primarily for recreation (72%) or symptom relief (37%). MC use was more common among white ( P =0.001), unmarried ( P =0.001), and tobacco-using individuals ( P =0.045). COVID-vaccinated individuals more often believed MC reduces symptoms ( P =0.015).
Conclusion: Many patients rely on unregulated sources regarding MC. This highlights the potential for improved provider-patient discussions to support informed decision-making regarding risks, benefits, and questions of MC in cancer care.
{"title":"Perceptions and Use of Medical Cannabis in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Jennifer S Chiang, Jennifer Hall, Sara Richter, Scott Jackson, Vera Qu, Erqi Pollom, Beth M Beadle","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001218","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A survey was conducted to evaluate perceptions, use, and information sources of medical cannabis (MC) among patients with head and neck cancer and identify opportunities for providers to clarify its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients with head and neck cancer seen in the radiation oncology department at a single institution in CA (October 2022 to June 2023; November 2023 to January 2024) were screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Surveys were emailed. Demographic/clinical data were collected and recorded from the electronic health record and surveys, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, metastatic status, COVID-19 vaccination status, substance use history, relationship and employment status, and education level. Associations between clinical/socioeconomic factors and perception/use of MC were analyzed using χ 2 tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 258 eligible patients, 122 completed the survey. Most reported reliance on the internet for MC information (70%); only 20% reported consulting with their cancer treatment team. Most (75%) agreed MC can help reduce cancer-related symptoms. Some agreed or were neutral regarding the potential of MC to cure cancer (37%) or prolong life (61%). Overall, 61% of patients reported having used MC, primarily for recreation (72%) or symptom relief (37%). MC use was more common among white ( P =0.001), unmarried ( P =0.001), and tobacco-using individuals ( P =0.045). COVID-vaccinated individuals more often believed MC reduces symptoms ( P =0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many patients rely on unregulated sources regarding MC. This highlights the potential for improved provider-patient discussions to support informed decision-making regarding risks, benefits, and questions of MC in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"548-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144259296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001219
Matthew M Culbert, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru, Eric D Brooks, Teena Burchianti, Daniela Martir, Valerie Vázquez, Hope Boucher, Armita Motaparthi, Julie A Bradley
Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) remains a critical public health issue where early detection significantly improves outcomes. Despite advancements, disparities in screening awareness and access persist, particularly in underserved populations. This study evaluates a comprehensive, technology-driven educational campaign designed to empower individuals to advocate for their breast health, bridging gaps in knowledge and accessibility.
Methods: Between 10/1/22 and 12/2/22, a multiplatform campaign was conducted with IRB approval. The initiative utilized traditional media, including televised ads and educational videos, and digital tools such as a mobile app and website in English and Spanish. Central to this campaign was an interactive risk calculator, offering personalized BC screening recommendations. Data collection included user demographics, platform engagement metrics, and the identification of high-risk individuals. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using campaign budget data.
Results: The campaign reached 673,920 individuals through televised ads and 152,672 impressions by digital ads. The website garnered 930 unique impressions, while the app recorded 2752 downloads across 131 countries. The risk calculator was completed 637 times, identifying 72 high-risk individuals. Follow-up data revealed ongoing engagement, with the calculator used an additional 1468 times. The cost per conversion was $1.62, and the cost to identify a high-risk individual was $209.27, demonstrating remarkable cost-efficiency.
Conclusions: This campaign successfully increased BC awareness and early detection efforts, leveraging a cost-effective, multiplatform approach. The integration of personalized tools like the risk calculator underscores the potential of digital interventions in health education. Future efforts should build on this model to further enhance reach and health outcomes.
{"title":"Empowering Self-advocacy for Breast Health: A Successful Educational Campaign on Breast Cancer Risk and Screening Recommendations.","authors":"Matthew M Culbert, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru, Eric D Brooks, Teena Burchianti, Daniela Martir, Valerie Vázquez, Hope Boucher, Armita Motaparthi, Julie A Bradley","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001219","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001219","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast cancer (BC) remains a critical public health issue where early detection significantly improves outcomes. Despite advancements, disparities in screening awareness and access persist, particularly in underserved populations. This study evaluates a comprehensive, technology-driven educational campaign designed to empower individuals to advocate for their breast health, bridging gaps in knowledge and accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 10/1/22 and 12/2/22, a multiplatform campaign was conducted with IRB approval. The initiative utilized traditional media, including televised ads and educational videos, and digital tools such as a mobile app and website in English and Spanish. Central to this campaign was an interactive risk calculator, offering personalized BC screening recommendations. Data collection included user demographics, platform engagement metrics, and the identification of high-risk individuals. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using campaign budget data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The campaign reached 673,920 individuals through televised ads and 152,672 impressions by digital ads. The website garnered 930 unique impressions, while the app recorded 2752 downloads across 131 countries. The risk calculator was completed 637 times, identifying 72 high-risk individuals. Follow-up data revealed ongoing engagement, with the calculator used an additional 1468 times. The cost per conversion was $1.62, and the cost to identify a high-risk individual was $209.27, demonstrating remarkable cost-efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This campaign successfully increased BC awareness and early detection efforts, leveraging a cost-effective, multiplatform approach. The integration of personalized tools like the risk calculator underscores the potential of digital interventions in health education. Future efforts should build on this model to further enhance reach and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"560-565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144555639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-05-15DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001215
Arielle Sabbah, Guila Delouya, Mikhael Laskine, Daniel Taussky
Objectives: This paper examines the life and research of Otto Warburg (1883 to 1970), who identified the so-called Warburg effect. Warburg personal life and scientific career were notable.
Methods: This study summarizes the key aspects of his life, the Warburg effect, and its significance in prostate cancer.
Results: Despite being classified as non-Aryan, Warburg continued his research as the director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cell Physiology during World War II. He also cohabited openly with a male partner. The Warburg effect is a metabolic hallmark of cancer, where cells preferentially utilize glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation, even in the presence of oxygen. This metabolic shift confers key advantages to tumor survival, including rapid ATP production, biosynthetic support for proliferation, and resistance to apoptosis. In prostate cancer, the metabolism undergoes a unique transformation. Normal prostate cells are characterized by citrate secretion; however, as malignancy develops, the cells adapt to oxidative metabolism. At the metastatic stage, the Warburg effect becomes more pronounced and is influenced by the tumor microenvironment and interactions with cancer-associated fibroblasts and bone marrow adipocytes. These metabolic changes have significant clinical implications. While FDG-PET scans serve as a diagnostic tool in many cancers, their utility in early-stage prostate cancer is limited owing to its delayed metabolic shift. Metabolic-targeted therapies, such as dichloroacetate (DCA) and glycolysis inhibitors, are emerging as promising strategies to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Conclusions: Elucidating the role of metabolic reprogramming in prostate cancer could reveal new avenues for treatment, particularly for castration-resistant and metastatic diseases.
{"title":"Metabolic Plasticity in Prostate Cancer: The Warburg Effect and Its Clinical Relevance.","authors":"Arielle Sabbah, Guila Delouya, Mikhael Laskine, Daniel Taussky","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001215","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper examines the life and research of Otto Warburg (1883 to 1970), who identified the so-called Warburg effect. Warburg personal life and scientific career were notable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study summarizes the key aspects of his life, the Warburg effect, and its significance in prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite being classified as non-Aryan, Warburg continued his research as the director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Cell Physiology during World War II. He also cohabited openly with a male partner. The Warburg effect is a metabolic hallmark of cancer, where cells preferentially utilize glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation, even in the presence of oxygen. This metabolic shift confers key advantages to tumor survival, including rapid ATP production, biosynthetic support for proliferation, and resistance to apoptosis. In prostate cancer, the metabolism undergoes a unique transformation. Normal prostate cells are characterized by citrate secretion; however, as malignancy develops, the cells adapt to oxidative metabolism. At the metastatic stage, the Warburg effect becomes more pronounced and is influenced by the tumor microenvironment and interactions with cancer-associated fibroblasts and bone marrow adipocytes. These metabolic changes have significant clinical implications. While FDG-PET scans serve as a diagnostic tool in many cancers, their utility in early-stage prostate cancer is limited owing to its delayed metabolic shift. Metabolic-targeted therapies, such as dichloroacetate (DCA) and glycolysis inhibitors, are emerging as promising strategies to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elucidating the role of metabolic reprogramming in prostate cancer could reveal new avenues for treatment, particularly for castration-resistant and metastatic diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"566-571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144081854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001264
Benjamin K Talom, Christina C Huang, Monique N Westley, Yvonne C Cotterell, Yilun Sun, Reshma Jagsi, Shearwood McClelland
Objectives: Academic promotion in radiation oncology is influenced by multiple factors, including scholarly productivity and demographic characteristics. While citation-based metrics such as the h-index are increasingly used as objective measures of academic output, the impact of demographic factors such as sex and underrepresented minority (URM) status remains inadequately defined. This study represents the first evaluation of the predictive value of h-index, sex, and URM status on academic promotion.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 554 radiation oncologists from 51 NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, initially identified in 2019 (T1) and re-evaluated in 2023 (T2), was assessed. Academic promotion status, h-index (2019), sex, URM status, and institutional affiliation were recorded. A generalized linear mixed model assessed associations between these variables and promotion status, with significance defined as P<0.05.
Results: The cohort included 203 women (36.7%) and 21 URMs (3.8%); overall, 338 (61%) received promotions between T1 and T2. The mean h-index was 12.3 (median=9), with promoted individuals averaging 15.3 versus 10 for those not promoted. A statistically significant association was found between a higher h-index and promotion (P<0.0001). Further analysis revealed that neither female sex (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.52; P=0.94) nor URM status (odds ratio: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.19-1.71; P=0.32) was significantly associated with promotion.
Conclusions: In the first examination of the impact of h-index on radiation oncology promotion, a higher h-index is a statistically significant predictor of academic promotion among radiation oncologists. Given limited statistical power to detect differences by demographic characteristics and ongoing underrepresentation of certain groups compared with the population, ongoing work to ensure fair access to opportunities for all remains important.
{"title":"H-Index and Promotion in Academic Radiation Oncology.","authors":"Benjamin K Talom, Christina C Huang, Monique N Westley, Yvonne C Cotterell, Yilun Sun, Reshma Jagsi, Shearwood McClelland","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Academic promotion in radiation oncology is influenced by multiple factors, including scholarly productivity and demographic characteristics. While citation-based metrics such as the h-index are increasingly used as objective measures of academic output, the impact of demographic factors such as sex and underrepresented minority (URM) status remains inadequately defined. This study represents the first evaluation of the predictive value of h-index, sex, and URM status on academic promotion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 554 radiation oncologists from 51 NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, initially identified in 2019 (T1) and re-evaluated in 2023 (T2), was assessed. Academic promotion status, h-index (2019), sex, URM status, and institutional affiliation were recorded. A generalized linear mixed model assessed associations between these variables and promotion status, with significance defined as P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 203 women (36.7%) and 21 URMs (3.8%); overall, 338 (61%) received promotions between T1 and T2. The mean h-index was 12.3 (median=9), with promoted individuals averaging 15.3 versus 10 for those not promoted. A statistically significant association was found between a higher h-index and promotion (P<0.0001). Further analysis revealed that neither female sex (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.52; P=0.94) nor URM status (odds ratio: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.19-1.71; P=0.32) was significantly associated with promotion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first examination of the impact of h-index on radiation oncology promotion, a higher h-index is a statistically significant predictor of academic promotion among radiation oncologists. Given limited statistical power to detect differences by demographic characteristics and ongoing underrepresentation of certain groups compared with the population, ongoing work to ensure fair access to opportunities for all remains important.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-20DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001263
Aminah Jatoi, Nathan R Foster, Andrea Wahner Hendrickson, Matthew S Block, S John Weroha, Erik J Asmus, Nicole R Murray, Alan P Fields
Objectives: This trial served as a proof-of-concept for whether inhibition of protein kinase C iota (PKCι) with auranofin and sirolimus provide antineoplastic effects in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Methods: This drug combination was administered to patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Dosing was based on unpublished phase 1 data and consisted of auranofin 6 mg and sirolimus 5 mg both orally per day of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was tumor response. Available tumor tissue was assessed for PKCι protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and PRKCI copy number by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) after the start of cancer therapy.
Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and 21 were evaluable for all clinical trial endpoints. One patient was unevaluable because she did not receive a full chemotherapy cycle. No tumor responses were seen in the first 21 patients, resulting in early trial termination per a priori trial design. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.7). The median overall survival was 4.4 months (95% CI: 2.6-12.5). Fourteen (67%) patients had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event. Nineteen of 21 evaluable patients had available tumor tissue, which showed the median PKCι copy number averaged per cell of 3 (range: 2 to 7), and PKCι expression (at least 1+) in all.
Conclusions: As prescribed here, auranofin and sirolimus manifested no antineoplastic activity in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer that expressed PKCι.
{"title":"A Phase 2 Trial of Protein Kinase C Iota Inhibition With the Combination of Auranofin and Sirolimus in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Aminah Jatoi, Nathan R Foster, Andrea Wahner Hendrickson, Matthew S Block, S John Weroha, Erik J Asmus, Nicole R Murray, Alan P Fields","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This trial served as a proof-of-concept for whether inhibition of protein kinase C iota (PKCι) with auranofin and sirolimus provide antineoplastic effects in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This drug combination was administered to patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Dosing was based on unpublished phase 1 data and consisted of auranofin 6 mg and sirolimus 5 mg both orally per day of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was tumor response. Available tumor tissue was assessed for PKCι protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and PRKCI copy number by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) after the start of cancer therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and 21 were evaluable for all clinical trial endpoints. One patient was unevaluable because she did not receive a full chemotherapy cycle. No tumor responses were seen in the first 21 patients, resulting in early trial termination per a priori trial design. The median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.7). The median overall survival was 4.4 months (95% CI: 2.6-12.5). Fourteen (67%) patients had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event. Nineteen of 21 evaluable patients had available tumor tissue, which showed the median PKCι copy number averaged per cell of 3 (range: 2 to 7), and PKCι expression (at least 1+) in all.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As prescribed here, auranofin and sirolimus manifested no antineoplastic activity in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer that expressed PKCι.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145330931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001258
Adeena Jamil, Nouman Aziz, Zunaira Saeed, Abdul Ahad, Muhammad M Ashrafi, Owais Ahmad, Eyman Wasim, Lama Qadri, Anusha A M Farid, Muhammad A Mushtaq, Quratulain J Narejo, Muhammad Huzaifa, Abdur Rehman
Objectives: Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor with a highly aggressive course and poor prognosis (5-year survival ≤15%). Here, we assessed trends in regional and demographic differences in cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020.
Methods: The CDC WONDER (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database was utilized to examine death certificates (1999-2020) for cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality. Age-adjusted mortality rates were extracted per 100,000 individuals, and their associated annual percent changes with 95% CIs were calculated. To identify overall trends for demographic (sex, race, ethnicity, and age) and regional groups, Joinpoint regression (NCI, version 5.0.2) was utilized.
Results: One lakh forty-eight thousand eight hundred fifty-one cholangiocarcinoma-related deaths occurred between 1999 and 2020. The overall age-adjusted mortality rate has increased from 1.9 in 1999 to 3.2 in 2020. Higher mortality rates were observed for males (males: 2.9 vs. females: 2.3), non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander patients (3.3), and metropolitan area residents (2.6). African Americans exhibited the highest annual percent increase since 1999 (3.47; 95% CI: 3.01-4.12). Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii ranked in the top 90th percentile, and the northeast region had the highest overall age-adjusted mortality rates.
Conclusions: In the last 2 decades, Cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality has increased overall in the United States. Demographic and geographic disparities persist, with higher age-adjusted mortality rates observed in males, Asians, and individuals residing in the northeast region and metropolitan areas. Further research and targeted strategies for different demographics are needed to curb increasing levels of Cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality in the United States.
{"title":"Demographic and Regional Trends in Mortality Related to Cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: 1999 to 2020.","authors":"Adeena Jamil, Nouman Aziz, Zunaira Saeed, Abdul Ahad, Muhammad M Ashrafi, Owais Ahmad, Eyman Wasim, Lama Qadri, Anusha A M Farid, Muhammad A Mushtaq, Quratulain J Narejo, Muhammad Huzaifa, Abdur Rehman","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumor with a highly aggressive course and poor prognosis (5-year survival ≤15%). Here, we assessed trends in regional and demographic differences in cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CDC WONDER (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database was utilized to examine death certificates (1999-2020) for cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality. Age-adjusted mortality rates were extracted per 100,000 individuals, and their associated annual percent changes with 95% CIs were calculated. To identify overall trends for demographic (sex, race, ethnicity, and age) and regional groups, Joinpoint regression (NCI, version 5.0.2) was utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One lakh forty-eight thousand eight hundred fifty-one cholangiocarcinoma-related deaths occurred between 1999 and 2020. The overall age-adjusted mortality rate has increased from 1.9 in 1999 to 3.2 in 2020. Higher mortality rates were observed for males (males: 2.9 vs. females: 2.3), non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander patients (3.3), and metropolitan area residents (2.6). African Americans exhibited the highest annual percent increase since 1999 (3.47; 95% CI: 3.01-4.12). Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii ranked in the top 90th percentile, and the northeast region had the highest overall age-adjusted mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the last 2 decades, Cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality has increased overall in the United States. Demographic and geographic disparities persist, with higher age-adjusted mortality rates observed in males, Asians, and individuals residing in the northeast region and metropolitan areas. Further research and targeted strategies for different demographics are needed to curb increasing levels of Cholangiocarcinoma-related mortality in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-15DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001257
Shearwood McClelland, Ursula Burnette, Louisa Onyewadume, Tamika K Smith, Corey W Speers
Objectives: Black breast cancer patients have substantially decreased access to optimal breast-conserving cancer care than white patients. Patient navigation has never been formally implemented into the receipt of radiation therapy (RT) for black patients. We present initial results from an ongoing phase I trial assessing the impact of patient navigation on RT completion in this patient population.
Methods: The Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) program is a phase I trial (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05978232) involving black breast cancer patients consented for postlumpectomy RT. Participants were assigned a patient navigator throughout the course of RT and post-RT care, and provided travel vouchers to offset RT transportation cost. Patients refusing trial participation were assessed to determine RT completion rate. The primary trial endpoint is RT completion rate following initiation of patient navigation.
Results: Of 54 trial-eligible patients, 36 accepted and 18 declined; no patient had received navigation before being offered trial enrollment. Of those declining enrollment 12/18 (66.7%) completed RT; of these 12, 9 (75%) completed RT without delay. 34/36 patients (94.4%) who enrolled completed RT, of whom 19 (55.9%) completed RT without delay. The differences in RT completion between patients having accepted versus declined trial enrollment were statistically significant ( P = 0.0124).
Conclusions: Early results of an ongoing phase I trial reveal that incorporation of patient navigation following initial radiation oncology consultation significantly improves adjuvant RT completion rates in early-stage black breast cancer patients. Further work examining patient navigation is ongoing.
{"title":"Impact of Patient Navigation on Radiation Therapy Completion in Black Breast Cancer Patients: Early Phase I Trial Results From the Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) Program.","authors":"Shearwood McClelland, Ursula Burnette, Louisa Onyewadume, Tamika K Smith, Corey W Speers","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001257","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Black breast cancer patients have substantially decreased access to optimal breast-conserving cancer care than white patients. Patient navigation has never been formally implemented into the receipt of radiation therapy (RT) for black patients. We present initial results from an ongoing phase I trial assessing the impact of patient navigation on RT completion in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) program is a phase I trial (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05978232) involving black breast cancer patients consented for postlumpectomy RT. Participants were assigned a patient navigator throughout the course of RT and post-RT care, and provided travel vouchers to offset RT transportation cost. Patients refusing trial participation were assessed to determine RT completion rate. The primary trial endpoint is RT completion rate following initiation of patient navigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54 trial-eligible patients, 36 accepted and 18 declined; no patient had received navigation before being offered trial enrollment. Of those declining enrollment 12/18 (66.7%) completed RT; of these 12, 9 (75%) completed RT without delay. 34/36 patients (94.4%) who enrolled completed RT, of whom 19 (55.9%) completed RT without delay. The differences in RT completion between patients having accepted versus declined trial enrollment were statistically significant ( P = 0.0124).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early results of an ongoing phase I trial reveal that incorporation of patient navigation following initial radiation oncology consultation significantly improves adjuvant RT completion rates in early-stage black breast cancer patients. Further work examining patient navigation is ongoing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}