首页 > 最新文献

Academic Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
Author Response to “Clinical and Radiologic Contextualization of Automated BAC Quantification: A Commentary ” 作者对“致编辑的信:使用基于unet的深度学习检测心血管疾病来量化乳房x光片中的乳腺动脉钙化”的回复。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.041
Wenbo Li MSc , Qiyu Zhang BSc , Dale J. Black BSc , Huanjun Ding PhD , Carlos Iribarren MD, MPH, PhD , Alireza Shojazadeh MD , Sabee Molloi PhD
{"title":"Author Response to “Clinical and Radiologic Contextualization of Automated BAC Quantification: A Commentary ”","authors":"Wenbo Li MSc , Qiyu Zhang BSc , Dale J. Black BSc , Huanjun Ding PhD , Carlos Iribarren MD, MPH, PhD , Alireza Shojazadeh MD , Sabee Molloi PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.041","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Page 81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145294345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictions of Response in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Clinical Data, Deep Learning, and Radiomics 使用临床数据、深度学习和放射组学预测免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的反应
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.037
Chunxiao Wang , Yuxin Li , Yang Ji, Kang Yu, Chunhui Qin, Ling Liu, Yunjia Shuai, Jiahui Chen, Ao Li, Tong Zhang

Background

Determining predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is a complex task.

Objective

This research aimed to develop a multimodal model (CRDL) integrating clinical data, deep learning (DL), and radiomics (Rad) to predict immune responses in NSCLC patients receiving checkpoint blockade therapies. This study also evaluated whether CRDL outperforms unimodal, pre-fusion models (Pre-FMs) and post-fusion models (Post-FMs).

Methods

This is a retrospective study that utilized data from 228 lung cancer patients at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, with varying Programmed Death-Ligand 1(PD-L1) expression levels among the patients. 228 NSCLC patients were randomly divided into two groups in a 7:3 ratio: the training cohort (n = 159) and the validation cohort (n = 69). Image histological features were extracted using the "PyRadiomics" package, and DL features were obtained through the deep convolutional neural network from chest computed tomography images, and clinical data from the patients were also collected. Feature reduction was performed using t-tests and the Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Unimodal modal and Pre-FMs were constructed using random forests, while the post-fusion model was developed using a support vector machine approach. The performance of the model was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

512 DL features and 382 Rad features were extracted. The CRDL model demonstrated superior performance with AUC values of 0.884 in the validation dataset and 0.976 in the training dataset, surpassing the best DL model in both unimodal and pre-fusion settings, which had training and validation AUCs of 0.854 and 0.749.

Conclusion

The CRDL model accurately forecasts immunotherapy responses in NSCLC patients, offering one dependable non-invasive test.
背景:确定非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者免疫治疗反应的预测性生物标志物是一项复杂的任务。目的:本研究旨在建立一种整合临床数据、深度学习(DL)和放射组学(Rad)的多模态模型(CRDL),以预测接受检查点阻断治疗的NSCLC患者的免疫反应。本研究还评估了CRDL是否优于单峰模型、融合前模型(Pre-FMs)和融合后模型(Post-FMs)。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,利用了纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心228名肺癌患者的数据,这些患者的程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达水平不同。228例NSCLC患者按7:3的比例随机分为两组:训练组(n=159)和验证组(n=69)。使用“PyRadiomics”软件包提取图像组织学特征,通过深度卷积神经网络提取胸部ct图像的DL特征,并收集患者的临床资料。使用t检验和最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归进行特征缩减。采用随机森林方法构建单峰模型和预融合模型,采用支持向量机方法构建融合后模型。该模型的性能通过接收机工作特性曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量。结果:提取DL特征512个,Rad特征382个。CRDL模型在验证集和训练集的AUC值分别为0.884和0.976,优于单峰和预融合设置下的最佳DL模型,前者的训练AUC和验证AUC分别为0.854和0.749。结论:CRDL模型准确预测非小细胞肺癌患者的免疫治疗反应,提供了一种可靠的无创检测方法。
{"title":"Predictions of Response in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Clinical Data, Deep Learning, and Radiomics","authors":"Chunxiao Wang ,&nbsp;Yuxin Li ,&nbsp;Yang Ji,&nbsp;Kang Yu,&nbsp;Chunhui Qin,&nbsp;Ling Liu,&nbsp;Yunjia Shuai,&nbsp;Jiahui Chen,&nbsp;Ao Li,&nbsp;Tong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.037","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Determining predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is a complex task.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This research aimed to develop a multimodal model (CRDL) integrating clinical data, deep learning (DL), and radiomics (Rad) to predict immune responses in NSCLC patients receiving checkpoint blockade therapies. This study also evaluated whether CRDL outperforms unimodal, pre-fusion models (Pre-FMs) and post-fusion models (Post-FMs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective study that utilized data from 228 lung cancer patients at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, with varying Programmed Death-Ligand 1(PD-L1) expression levels among the patients. 228 NSCLC patients were randomly divided into two groups in a 7:3 ratio: the training cohort (<em>n<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->159) and the validation cohort (<em>n<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->69). Image histological features were extracted using the \"PyRadiomics\" package, and DL features were obtained through the deep convolutional neural network from chest computed tomography images, and clinical data from the patients were also collected. Feature reduction was performed using t-tests and the Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Unimodal modal and Pre-FMs were constructed using random forests, while the post-fusion model was developed using a support vector machine approach. The performance of the model was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>512 DL features and 382 Rad features were extracted. The CRDL model demonstrated superior performance with AUC values of 0.884 in the validation dataset and 0.976 in the training dataset, surpassing the best DL model in both unimodal and pre-fusion settings, which had training and validation AUCs of 0.854 and 0.749.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CRDL model accurately forecasts immunotherapy responses in NSCLC patients, offering one dependable non-invasive test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 236-254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145294394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Interpretable Radiomics Model Based on Pituitary MRI to Predict Growth Hormone Deficiency in Short-statured Children: A Multicenter Study 基于垂体MRI的可解释放射组学模型预测矮小儿童生长激素缺乏症:一项多中心研究。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.006
Fukun Shi , Xianqing Ren , Qian Xu , Jiameng Si , Yihao Yan , Junjie Shu , Shengli Shi , Ke Jin , Fenfen Li , Jiajia Zhang , Lan Zhang

Rationale and Objectives

To develop and validate an interpretable radiomics model based on pituitary MRI to predict growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children with short stature.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study enrolled 202 children (105 GHD, 97 idiopathic short stature [ISS]) as an internal cohort (7:3 ratio for training/testing cohorts) from institution I, and 138 children (61 GHD, 77 ISS) from institution II and institution III as an external validation cohort. Radiomics features were selected by SelectKBest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), subsequently used to construct six machine learning models. Diagnostic performance of model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and calibration curves. The interpretability of the model was assessed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).

Results

A total of 17 radiomics features were selected. Among all classifiers, support vector machine (SVM)-based radiomics model exhibited the highest diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.813, 0.928), 0.878 (95% CI: 0.786, 0.951), and 0.885 (95% CI: 0.833, 0.937) in training, testing, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The SVM-integrated clinical-radiomics model yielded comparable efficacy, with AUCs of 0.874 (95% CI: 0.812, 0.928), 0.878 (95% CI: 0.786, 0.952), and 0.889 (95% CI: 0.830, 0.939) across the same cohorts. Both radiomics-based models significantly outperformed the clinical model (all p<0.001), while no statistically significant difference was observed between the radiomics and clinical-radiomics models (all p>0.05). The SHAP analysis identified three key radiomics features with significant differences between GHD and ISS groups (all p<0.001).

Conclusions

The interpretable radiomics-driven SVM model effectively predicts GH levels, providing a clinically viable, non-invasive alternative to GH stimulation test in children with short stature.
基本原理和目的:开发并验证基于垂体MRI的可解释放射组学模型,以预测矮小儿童的生长激素缺乏症(GHD)。方法:这项回顾性多中心研究纳入了来自第一机构的202名儿童(105名GHD, 97名特发性身材矮小[ISS])作为内部队列(训练/测试队列的比例为7:3),以及来自第二机构和第三机构的138名儿童(61名GHD, 77名ISS)作为外部验证队列。通过SelectKBest和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)选择放射组学特征,随后用于构建六个机器学习模型。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性和校准曲线评价模型的诊断性能。采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)评价模型的可解释性。结果:共选取17个放射组学特征。在所有分类器中,基于支持向量机(SVM)的放射组学模型表现出最高的诊断性能,在训练、测试和外部验证队列中的auc分别为0.877 (95% CI: 0.813, 0.928)、0.878 (95% CI: 0.786, 0.951)和0.885 (95% CI: 0.833, 0.937)。支持向量机集成的临床放射组学模型产生了相当的疗效,在相同的队列中,auc分别为0.874 (95% CI: 0.812, 0.928)、0.878 (95% CI: 0.786, 0.952)和0.889 (95% CI: 0.830, 0.939)。两种基于放射组学的模型均显著优于临床模型(均p0.05)。SHAP分析确定了三个关键的放射组学特征,在GHD组和ISS组之间存在显著差异。结论:可解释的放射组学驱动的SVM模型有效地预测生长激素水平,为矮小儿童提供了临床可行的、无创的替代生长激素刺激试验的方法。
{"title":"An Interpretable Radiomics Model Based on Pituitary MRI to Predict Growth Hormone Deficiency in Short-statured Children: A Multicenter Study","authors":"Fukun Shi ,&nbsp;Xianqing Ren ,&nbsp;Qian Xu ,&nbsp;Jiameng Si ,&nbsp;Yihao Yan ,&nbsp;Junjie Shu ,&nbsp;Shengli Shi ,&nbsp;Ke Jin ,&nbsp;Fenfen Li ,&nbsp;Jiajia Zhang ,&nbsp;Lan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To develop and validate an interpretable radiomics model based on pituitary MRI to predict growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children with short stature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective multicenter study enrolled 202 children (105 GHD, 97 idiopathic short stature [ISS]) as an internal cohort (7:3 ratio for training/testing cohorts) from institution I, and 138 children (61 GHD, 77 ISS) from institution II and institution III as an external validation cohort. Radiomics features were selected by SelectKBest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), subsequently used to construct six machine learning models. Diagnostic performance of model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and calibration curves. The interpretability of the model was assessed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 17 radiomics features were selected. Among all classifiers, support vector machine (SVM)-based radiomics model exhibited the highest diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.877 (95% <em>CI</em>: 0.813, 0.928), 0.878 (95% <em>CI</em>: 0.786, 0.951), and 0.885 (95% <em>CI</em>: 0.833, 0.937) in training, testing, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The SVM-integrated clinical-radiomics model yielded comparable efficacy, with AUCs of 0.874 (95% <em>CI</em>: 0.812, 0.928), 0.878 (95% <em>CI</em>: 0.786, 0.952), and 0.889 (95% <em>CI</em>: 0.830, 0.939) across the same cohorts. Both radiomics-based models significantly outperformed the clinical model (all <em>p</em>&lt;0.001), while no statistically significant difference was observed between the radiomics and clinical-radiomics models (all <em>p</em>&gt;0.05). The SHAP analysis identified three key radiomics features with significant differences between GHD and ISS groups (all <em>p</em>&lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The interpretable radiomics-driven SVM model effectively predicts GH levels, providing a clinically viable, non-invasive alternative to GH stimulation test in children with short stature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 168-179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145395046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in R01 and R01 Equivalent Funding to Radiology 放射学的R01和R01等效资助趋势。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.039
Kelly M. Gillen PhD, MBA , Mert Şişman , Alan Wu , Arindam RoyChoudhury PhD , Ajay Gupta MD, MS

Rationale and Objectives

With a budget of almost $48 billion in 2024, including $37 billion allocated for extramural funding, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the major funding source for biomedical research in the United States. Given the multi-faceted impact of NIH funding on academic institutions and their communities, we sought to characterize trends in research project grant funding to departments of radiology.
This study aimed to assess trends in R01 and R01 equivalent award funding to departments of radiology from 2014 to 2024.

Materials and Methods

All funding data were retrieved from NIH RePORTER (Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools) and limited to R01 and R01 equivalent awards (R01+) to all clinical departments (ACDs) from NIH FY 2014 and FY 2024. Awards and funding data included ACDs as categorized by the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research. Information on principal investigator (PI) advanced degrees was obtained by web searches and visiting the PI’s faculty page through their respective academic institution.

Results

From 2014 to 2024, there was a 54.3% increase in the number of R01s awarded to radiology as compared to a 31.7% increase in R01s awarded to ACDs. There was a 69.0% increase in the number of R01+s awarded to radiology as compared to a 34.4% increase in R01+s awarded to ACDs during this same period.

Conclusion

Since FY2014, there has been an increase in funding from the NIH to ACDs and specifically to radiology, but departments of radiology are outpacing ACDs in several key R01 and R01+ funding metrics, including greater increases in the number of awards.
基本原理和目标:美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)是美国生物医学研究的主要资金来源,2024年的预算近480亿美元,其中包括370亿美元的校外资金。鉴于NIH资助对学术机构及其社区的多方面影响,我们试图描述放射学部门研究项目资助的趋势。本研究旨在评估2014 - 2024年放射科R01和R01等效奖励资金的趋势。材料和方法:所有资助数据均从NIH RePORTER(研究组合在线报告工具)检索,仅限于NIH 2014财年和2024财年向所有临床部门(ACDs)提供的R01和R01等效奖励(R01+)。奖励和资助数据包括由蓝岭医学研究所分类的acd。有关首席研究员(PI)高级学位的信息可通过网络搜索和访问其各自学术机构的PI教员页面获得。结果:从2014年到2024年,授予放射学的r01数量增加了54.3%,而授予ACDs的r01数量增加了31.7%。在同一期间,放射科获发01+s的人数增加了69.0%,而辅助护理科获发01+s的人数则增加了34.4%。结论:自2014财年以来,NIH对ACDs的资助有所增加,特别是对放射学的资助,但放射学部门在几个关键的R01和R01+资助指标上超过了ACDs,包括奖励数量的更大增长。
{"title":"Trends in R01 and R01 Equivalent Funding to Radiology","authors":"Kelly M. Gillen PhD, MBA ,&nbsp;Mert Şişman ,&nbsp;Alan Wu ,&nbsp;Arindam RoyChoudhury PhD ,&nbsp;Ajay Gupta MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.039","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.039","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>With a budget of almost $48 billion in 2024, including $37 billion allocated for extramural funding, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the major funding source for biomedical research in the United States. Given the multi-faceted impact of NIH funding on academic institutions and their communities, we sought to characterize trends in research project grant funding to departments of radiology.</div><div>This study aimed to assess trends in R01 and R01 equivalent award funding to departments of radiology from 2014 to 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>All funding data were retrieved from NIH RePORTER (Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools) and limited to R01 and R01 equivalent awards (R01<sup>+</sup>) to all clinical departments (ACDs) from NIH FY 2014 and FY 2024. Awards and funding data included ACDs as categorized by the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research. Information on principal investigator (PI) advanced degrees was obtained by web searches and visiting the PI’s faculty page through their respective academic institution.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2014 to 2024, there was a 54.3% increase in the number of R01s awarded to radiology as compared to a 31.7% increase in R01s awarded to ACDs. There was a 69.0% increase in the number of R01<sup>+</sup>s awarded to radiology as compared to a 34.4% increase in R01<sup>+</sup>s awarded to ACDs during this same period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Since FY2014, there has been an increase in funding from the NIH to ACDs and specifically to radiology, but departments of radiology are outpacing ACDs in several key R01 and R01<sup>+</sup> funding metrics, including greater increases in the number of awards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 15-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Challenges in Imaging-Based Nomogram Models for ALNM in TNBC: Commentary on Mammography and Ultrasound Approaches TNBC中ALNM基于成像的Nomogram模型所面临的挑战:关于乳腺x线摄影和超声方法的评论。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.042
Deniz Esin Tekcan Sanli , Ahmet Necati Sanli
{"title":"Challenges in Imaging-Based Nomogram Models for ALNM in TNBC: Commentary on Mammography and Ultrasound Approaches","authors":"Deniz Esin Tekcan Sanli ,&nbsp;Ahmet Necati Sanli","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 82-83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing MRI-Based Machine Learning Models for Breast Cancer Subtyping: Clarifications, Subtype Refinements, and Future Directions 推进基于mri的乳腺癌亚型机器学习模型:澄清、亚型改进和未来方向。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.046
Yi Zhou , Shuzheng Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Advancing MRI-Based Machine Learning Models for Breast Cancer Subtyping: Clarifications, Subtype Refinements, and Future Directions","authors":"Yi Zhou ,&nbsp;Shuzheng Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.046","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.046","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 77-78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on “Impact of Needle Gauge Selection on Sample Adequacy in Ultrasound-Guided Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis” “超声引导甲状腺细针穿刺中针规选择对样本充分性的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析”评论。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.012
Jagriti Gairola , Arvind Kumar , Nivedita Nikhil Desai , Karen Jaison
{"title":"Comment on “Impact of Needle Gauge Selection on Sample Adequacy in Ultrasound-Guided Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”","authors":"Jagriti Gairola ,&nbsp;Arvind Kumar ,&nbsp;Nivedita Nikhil Desai ,&nbsp;Karen Jaison","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 117-118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145395018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating Entrepreneurship In and Out of the Radiology Realm 在放射学领域内外引导企业家精神。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.06.032
Richard Ho , Omer A. Awan MD MPH CIIP
{"title":"Navigating Entrepreneurship In and Out of the Radiology Realm","authors":"Richard Ho ,&nbsp;Omer A. Awan MD MPH CIIP","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.06.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.06.032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 20-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144644093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pre- and Periprocedural Imaging Predicts Technical but not Clinical Success of Prostatic Artery Embolization Using Non-spherical PVA Particles—Insights From the Prospective PROEMBO Trial 术前和围手术期影像学预测非球形PVA颗粒前列腺动脉栓塞术的技术成功,但不能预测临床成功——来自前瞻性PROEMBO试验的见解。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.043
Vanessa F. Schmidt MD , Jil Grethen MD , Mariya Pryadko DMD , Hannah E. Gildein MD , Matthias P. Fabritius MD , Dominik Nörenberg MD , Philipp M. Kazmierczak MD , Clemens C. Cyran MD , Rajasekhara Ayyagari MD , Sinan Deniz MD , Moritz Wildgruber MD, PhD , Max Seidensticker MD , Maciej Pech MD , Jens Ricke MD , Daniel Puhr-Westerheide MD

Rationale and Objectives

To evaluate technical, clinical, and imaging success following prostatic artery embolization (PAE) and imaging-derived predictors of treatment success based on pre- and periprocedural imaging modalities.

Material and Methods

The prospective single-center PROEMBO trial included 119 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) undergoing PAE using non-spherical polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles. Pre- and periprocedural imaging included CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and cone-beam CT (CBCT). Technical success, clinical improvement (IPSS, QoL, ICIQ-SF, IIEF-EF), and imaging success (prostate volume reduction) were assessed at baseline and 1-, 6-, and 12 months of follow-ups. Imaging-derived predictors included prostatic artery anatomy, atherosclerotic plaque burden, iliac artery tortuosity, and intraprostatic density measurements after contrast administration.

Results

Median prostate volume was 66 mL (IQR, 49.5–96.5 mL). Bilateral embolization was achieved in 96/119 (80.7%), unilateral embolization in 18/119 (15.1%), and bilateral failure occurred in 5/119 patients (4.2%). IPSS improved by median of 7 points (IQR, 2–10) at 1 month, 7 points (IQR, 2.5–13) at 6 months, and 5 points (IQR, 2–12) at 12 months. MRI-based prostate volume significantly decreased by median of 6 mL (IQR, 0–16 mL), 7.5 mL (IQR, −0.75–20 mL), and 3 mL (IQR, −2–17 mL). Technical failure was significantly associated with number (p = 0.003) and cumulative area (p = 0.002) of calcified lesions along vascular access route. Iliac artery tortuosity differed significantly between groups, with higher angulation observed in patients with technical failure, e.g., bilateral angle sum of iliac bifurcation: 67.6 ± 21.2 vs. 87.8 ± 24.3 (p<0.001). PA anatomical variants, dominance patterns, and CTA-/CBCT-based density measurements showed no significant correlation with technical outcome (all p>0.05).

Conclusion

Pre- and periprocedural imaging offers valuable predictors of technical success in PAE. Atherosclerotic plaque burden and iliac artery tortuosity serve as practical markers for technical failure, thereby aiding patient selection and procedural planning.
理由和目的:评估前列腺动脉栓塞(PAE)后的技术、临床和影像学成功,以及基于术前和术中影像学模式的治疗成功的影像学预测因素。材料和方法:前瞻性单中心PROEMBO试验纳入119例使用非球形聚乙烯醇(PVA)颗粒进行PAE的症状性良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者。术前和围手术期影像学包括CT血管造影(CTA)、数字减影血管造影(DSA)和锥束CT (CBCT)。技术成功、临床改善(IPSS、生活质量、ICIQ-SF、IIEF-EF)和影像学成功(前列腺体积减少)在基线和1个月、6个月和12个月随访时进行评估。影像学预测因素包括前列腺动脉解剖、动脉粥样硬化斑块负担、髂动脉弯曲和对比剂后前列腺内密度测量。结果:前列腺容积中位数为66 mL (IQR, 49.5 ~ 96.5mL)。双侧栓塞96/119例(80.7%),单侧栓塞18例(15.1%),双侧栓塞失败5/119例(4.2%)。IPSS在1个月时改善7分(IQR, 2-10), 6个月时改善7分(IQR, 2.5-13), 12个月时改善5分(IQR, 2-12)。基于mri的前列腺体积中位数显著降低6ml (IQR, 0- 16ml)、7.5 mL (IQR, -0.75-20mL)和3ml (IQR, -2-17mL)。技术故障与血管通路沿线钙化病变数量(p=0.003)和累积面积(p=0.002)显著相关。髂动脉曲度组间差异显著,技术失败组的髂动脉曲度更高,双侧髂分叉角和分别为67.6±21.2比87.8±24.3 (p0.05)。结论:术前和术中影像学对PAE的技术成功提供了有价值的预测指标。动脉粥样硬化斑块负荷和髂动脉弯曲可作为技术失败的实际标志,从而帮助患者选择和手术计划。
{"title":"Pre- and Periprocedural Imaging Predicts Technical but not Clinical Success of Prostatic Artery Embolization Using Non-spherical PVA Particles—Insights From the Prospective PROEMBO Trial","authors":"Vanessa F. Schmidt MD ,&nbsp;Jil Grethen MD ,&nbsp;Mariya Pryadko DMD ,&nbsp;Hannah E. Gildein MD ,&nbsp;Matthias P. Fabritius MD ,&nbsp;Dominik Nörenberg MD ,&nbsp;Philipp M. Kazmierczak MD ,&nbsp;Clemens C. Cyran MD ,&nbsp;Rajasekhara Ayyagari MD ,&nbsp;Sinan Deniz MD ,&nbsp;Moritz Wildgruber MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Max Seidensticker MD ,&nbsp;Maciej Pech MD ,&nbsp;Jens Ricke MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Puhr-Westerheide MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.043","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.043","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate technical, clinical, and imaging success following prostatic artery embolization (PAE) and imaging-derived predictors of treatment success based on pre- and periprocedural imaging modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><div>The prospective single-center PROEMBO trial included 119 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) undergoing PAE using non-spherical polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles. Pre- and periprocedural imaging included CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and cone-beam CT (CBCT). Technical success, clinical improvement (IPSS, QoL, ICIQ-SF, IIEF-EF), and imaging success (prostate volume reduction) were assessed at baseline and 1-, 6-, and 12 months of follow-ups. Imaging-derived predictors included prostatic artery anatomy, atherosclerotic plaque burden, iliac artery tortuosity, and intraprostatic density measurements after contrast administration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median prostate volume was 66 mL (IQR, 49.5–96.5<!--> <!-->mL). Bilateral embolization was achieved in 96/119 (80.7%), unilateral embolization in 18/119 (15.1%), and bilateral failure occurred in 5/119 patients (4.2%). IPSS improved by median of 7 points (IQR, 2–10) at 1 month, 7 points (IQR, 2.5–13) at 6 months, and 5 points (IQR, 2–12) at 12 months. MRI-based prostate volume significantly decreased by median of 6 mL (IQR, 0–16 mL), 7.5 mL (IQR, −0.75–20<!--> <!-->mL), and 3 mL (IQR, −2–17<!--> <!-->mL). Technical failure was significantly associated with number (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003) and cumulative area (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002) of calcified lesions along vascular access route. Iliac artery tortuosity differed significantly between groups, with higher angulation observed in patients with technical failure, e.g., bilateral angle sum of iliac bifurcation: 67.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->21.2 vs. 87.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->24.3 (p&lt;0.001). PA anatomical variants, dominance patterns, and CTA-/CBCT-based density measurements showed no significant correlation with technical outcome (all p&gt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pre- and periprocedural imaging offers valuable predictors of technical success in PAE. Atherosclerotic plaque burden and iliac artery tortuosity serve as practical markers for technical failure, thereby aiding patient selection and procedural planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 121-133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145314107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Invasiveness of Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Ground-Glass Nodules Using CT Images 可解释的机器学习预测以毛玻璃结节为表现的肺腺癌的CT图像的侵袭性。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.004
Huairong Zhang , Lina Miao , Li Ma , Xiao Sun , Li-Na Ouyang , Yang Jing , Yifan Wang , Xiang Wang , Pei Wang , Li Zhu

Rationale and Objectives

Accurate prediction of the invasiveness of early-stage pulmonary adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) remains highly challenging. This study aims to integrate radiomics features from non-contrast CT (NECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), deep learning features, and intratumoral habitat features to improve prediction accuracy and provide robust support for clinical personalized surgical decision-making.

Materials and Methods

This dual-center retrospective study included 516 patients with pathologically confirmed GGNs (≤30 mm) from December 2018 to September 2023. Patients from center 1 were randomly divided into training (276 patients) and internal-validation (120 patients) sets, while patients from center 2 were all included into external-validation (120 patients) set. Intratumoral habitat analysis (ITH) was performed on NECT and CECT images using the K-means clustering algorithm. Radiomic features were extracted from the lesion regions and clustered subregions, deep learning features were obtained via a fine-tuned ResNet50 model. After feature selection, eight predictive models were established. Additionally, a dynamic nomogram (the comprehensive model) was developed and subjected to explainable analysis using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves.

Results

Among eight predictive models, the comprehensive model, which utilized multi-modal data as input demonstrated the highest accuracy in distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from pre-invasive lesions (AAH/AIS/MIA). In the training set, the AUC was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89–0.95), with 84% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 84% specificity. In the internal-validation set, the AUC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), with 82% accuracy, 88% sensitivity, and 74% specificity. In the external-validation set, the AUC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91), with 80% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 80% specificity. DCA analysis showed that the nomogram provided the highest net benefit when the threshold probability was ≥0.4, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed good calibration (P>0.05). SHAP analysis and the selected of optimal features revealed that wavelet-based texture features, deep learning features, and ITH features made significant contributions to the model's performance.

Conclusion

The comprehensive model (radiomics, deep learning, ITH, clinical variables) enables reliable prediction of the invasiveness of GGNs-ADC. It bridges imaging and pathology, potentially advancing personalized surgical decision-making in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.
基本原理和目的:准确预测以磨玻璃结节(ggn)表现的早期肺腺癌的侵袭性仍然极具挑战性。本研究旨在整合非对比CT (NECT)和增强CT (CECT)的放射组学特征、深度学习特征和肿瘤内栖息地特征,提高预测精度,为临床个性化手术决策提供有力支持。材料与方法:本双中心回顾性研究纳入了2018年12月至2023年9月516例病理证实的ggn(≤30mm)患者。中心1的患者随机分为训练组(276例)和内部验证组(120例),中心2的患者全部纳入外部验证组(120例)。采用K-means聚类算法对NECT和CECT图像进行瘤内生境分析(ITH)。从病变区域和聚类子区域提取放射学特征,通过微调的ResNet50模型获得深度学习特征。经过特征选择,建立了8个预测模型。此外,还开发了一个动态模态图(综合模型),并使用SHapley加性解释(SHapley Additive exPlanations)进行可解释分析。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、决策曲线分析(DCA)和校准曲线来评估模型的性能。结果:在8个预测模型中,采用多模态数据作为输入的综合模型在区分侵袭性腺癌(IAC)和侵袭前病变(AAH/AIS/MIA)方面的准确率最高。在训练集中,AUC为0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95),准确率为84%,灵敏度为85%,特异性为84%。在内部验证集中,AUC为0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95),准确度为82%,灵敏度为88%,特异性为74%。在外部验证集中,AUC为0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91),准确率为80%,灵敏度为80%,特异性为80%。DCA分析显示,当阈值概率≥0.4时,nomogram提供了最高的净效益,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验证实了良好的校准(P < 0.05)。SHAP分析和最优特征的选择表明,基于小波的纹理特征、深度学习特征和ITH特征对模型的性能有重要贡献。结论:综合模型(放射组学、深度学习、ITH、临床变量)能够可靠地预测GGNs-ADC的侵袭性。它连接了影像学和病理学,有可能推进早期肺腺癌的个性化手术决策。
{"title":"Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Invasiveness of Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Ground-Glass Nodules Using CT Images","authors":"Huairong Zhang ,&nbsp;Lina Miao ,&nbsp;Li Ma ,&nbsp;Xiao Sun ,&nbsp;Li-Na Ouyang ,&nbsp;Yang Jing ,&nbsp;Yifan Wang ,&nbsp;Xiang Wang ,&nbsp;Pei Wang ,&nbsp;Li Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Accurate prediction of the invasiveness of early-stage pulmonary adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) remains highly challenging. This study aims to integrate radiomics features from non-contrast CT (NECT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), deep learning features, and intratumoral habitat features to improve prediction accuracy and provide robust support for clinical personalized surgical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This dual-center retrospective study included 516 patients with pathologically confirmed GGNs (≤30<!--> <!-->mm) from December 2018 to September 2023. Patients from center 1 were randomly divided into training (276 patients) and internal-validation (120 patients) sets, while patients from center 2 were all included into external-validation (120 patients) set. Intratumoral habitat analysis (ITH) was performed on NECT and CECT images using the K-means clustering algorithm. Radiomic features were extracted from the lesion regions and clustered subregions, deep learning features were obtained via a fine-tuned ResNet50 model. After feature selection, eight predictive models were established. Additionally, a dynamic nomogram (the comprehensive model) was developed and subjected to explainable analysis using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among eight predictive models, the comprehensive model, which utilized multi-modal data as input demonstrated the highest accuracy in distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from pre-invasive lesions (AAH/AIS/MIA). In the training set, the AUC was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89–0.95), with 84% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 84% specificity. In the internal-validation set, the AUC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86–0.95), with 82% accuracy, 88% sensitivity, and 74% specificity. In the external-validation set, the AUC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91), with 80% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 80% specificity. DCA analysis showed that the nomogram provided the highest net benefit when the threshold probability was ≥0.4, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed good calibration (P&gt;0.05). SHAP analysis and the selected of optimal features revealed that wavelet-based texture features, deep learning features, and ITH features made significant contributions to the model's performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The comprehensive model (radiomics, deep learning, ITH, clinical variables) enables reliable prediction of the invasiveness of GGNs-ADC. It bridges imaging and pathology, potentially advancing personalized surgical decision-making in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 266-280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Academic Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1