首页 > 最新文献

Academic Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
A RRA Perspective on AI and Machine Learning Applications in Radiology: From Experimental to Clinically Viable Solutions 人工智能和机器学习在放射学中的应用:从实验到临床可行的解决方案。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.11.021
Joshua Brown MD, PhD , Brittany Z. Dashevsky MD, PhD , Dogan Polat MD , Florence Doo MD, MA , Christopher Straus MD , Anna Rozenshtein MD, MPH, FACR , Michele Retrouvey MD
This article is the first in a seven-part Radiology Research Alliance (RRA) review series on emerging technologies in radiology. It examines the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications across three domains: diagnostic interpretation, workflow optimization, and report generation. Advances in deep learning, multimodal large language models, and natural language processing have delivered improvements in accuracy, efficiency, and reporting quality. Yet important challenges remain, including variable performance, limited generalizability, and barriers to workflow integration. Current evidence shows that artificial intelligence is most effective when used to augment human expertise, with radiologist-AI collaboration producing the strongest outcomes. This review highlights the transition of artificial intelligence from experimental innovation to a clinically viable technology poised to enhance radiology practice when thoughtfully implemented with appropriate oversight.
本文是放射学研究联盟(RRA)关于放射学新兴技术的七部分评论系列中的第一篇。它考察了人工智能和机器学习应用在三个领域的作用:诊断解释、工作流优化和报告生成。深度学习、多模态大型语言模型和自然语言处理方面的进步提高了准确性、效率和报告质量。然而重要的挑战仍然存在,包括可变的性能、有限的通用性和工作流集成的障碍。目前的证据表明,人工智能在用于增强人类专业知识时是最有效的,放射科医生与人工智能的合作产生了最强的结果。这篇综述强调了人工智能从实验创新到临床可行技术的转变,当经过深思熟虑的实施和适当的监督时,人工智能有望增强放射学实践。
{"title":"A RRA Perspective on AI and Machine Learning Applications in Radiology: From Experimental to Clinically Viable Solutions","authors":"Joshua Brown MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Brittany Z. Dashevsky MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Dogan Polat MD ,&nbsp;Florence Doo MD, MA ,&nbsp;Christopher Straus MD ,&nbsp;Anna Rozenshtein MD, MPH, FACR ,&nbsp;Michele Retrouvey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.11.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.11.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article is the first in a seven-part Radiology Research Alliance (RRA) review series on emerging technologies in radiology. It examines the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications across three domains: diagnostic interpretation, workflow optimization, and report generation. Advances in deep learning, multimodal large language models, and natural language processing have delivered improvements in accuracy, efficiency, and reporting quality. Yet important challenges remain, including variable performance, limited generalizability, and barriers to workflow integration. Current evidence shows that artificial intelligence is most effective when used to augment human expertise, with radiologist-AI collaboration producing the strongest outcomes. This review highlights the transition of artificial intelligence from experimental innovation to a clinically viable technology poised to enhance radiology practice when thoughtfully implemented with appropriate oversight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 617-629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147357056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Hype to Implementation: RRA Perspective on Strategies for Adapting Radiology Departments to Emerging Technologies 从宣传到实施:RRA对使放射科适应新兴技术的策略的看法。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.01.039
Nicole Brofman MD , Eun Langman MD , Jessica M. Sin MD PhD , Mohiuddin Hadi MD , Joshua Brown MD, PhD , Florence Doo MD , Anna Rozenshtein MD, MPH , Michele Retrouvey MD
Radiology is entering an era defined by rapid innovation, with artificial intelligence, advanced imaging modalities, immersive visualization, and distributed networks poised to reshape clinical practice. Yet the pace of development has outstripped sustainable adoption, creating a gap between technological promise and departmental readiness. This final paper in the Radiology Research Alliance series shifts from description to prescription, offering a strategic blueprint for moving from hype to implementation. We propose four pillars as the foundation for departmental adaptation: workflow integration, workforce development, governance and ethics, and education. Within each, we outline concrete actions that radiology leaders can implement now, from piloting AI triage tools and developing hybrid human–machine reporting workflows, to embedding algorithmic literacy in training, establishing standing ethics and oversight committees, and investing in simulation labs and lifelong learning. Building on the analysis of the hype cycle presented earlier in this series, we demonstrate how departments can use it to prioritize adoption, calibrate oversight, and align training with technological maturity. Together, these strategies provide a practical framework for ensuring that innovation strengthens precision, efficiency, and patient-centered care. Departments that embrace this approach will lead medicine in demonstrating how emerging technologies can be responsibly and effectively implemented.
放射学正在进入一个快速创新的时代,人工智能、先进的成像方式、沉浸式可视化和分布式网络将重塑临床实践。然而,发展的速度已经超过了可持续的采用,在技术承诺和部门准备之间造成了差距。这是放射学研究联盟系列的最后一篇论文,从描述转向处方,为从宣传到实施提供了战略蓝图。我们提出了四个支柱作为部门适应的基础:工作流程整合、劳动力发展、管治和道德以及教育。在每一份报告中,我们概述了放射学领导者现在可以实施的具体行动,从试点人工智能分类工具和开发混合人机报告工作流程,到在培训中嵌入算法素养,建立常设道德和监督委员会,以及投资模拟实验室和终身学习。在本系列前面介绍的技术成熟度周期分析的基础上,我们演示了部门如何使用它来确定采用的优先级,校准监督,并使培训与技术成熟度保持一致。总之,这些战略提供了一个切实可行的框架,以确保创新加强了精度、效率和以患者为中心的护理。采用这种方法的部门将在展示如何负责任地和有效地实施新兴技术方面引领医学界。
{"title":"From Hype to Implementation: RRA Perspective on Strategies for Adapting Radiology Departments to Emerging Technologies","authors":"Nicole Brofman MD ,&nbsp;Eun Langman MD ,&nbsp;Jessica M. Sin MD PhD ,&nbsp;Mohiuddin Hadi MD ,&nbsp;Joshua Brown MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Florence Doo MD ,&nbsp;Anna Rozenshtein MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Michele Retrouvey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.01.039","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.01.039","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Radiology is entering an era defined by rapid innovation, with artificial intelligence, advanced imaging modalities, immersive visualization, and distributed networks poised to reshape clinical practice. Yet the pace of development has outstripped sustainable adoption, creating a gap between technological promise and departmental readiness. This final paper in the Radiology Research Alliance series shifts from description to prescription, offering a strategic blueprint for moving from hype to implementation. We propose four pillars as the foundation for departmental adaptation: workflow integration, workforce development, governance and ethics, and education. Within each, we outline concrete actions that radiology leaders can implement now, from piloting AI triage tools and developing hybrid human–machine reporting workflows, to embedding algorithmic literacy in training, establishing standing ethics and oversight committees, and investing in simulation labs and lifelong learning. Building on the analysis of the hype cycle presented earlier in this series, we demonstrate how departments can use it to prioritize adoption, calibrate oversight, and align training with technological maturity. Together, these strategies provide a practical framework for ensuring that innovation strengthens precision, efficiency, and patient-centered care. Departments that embrace this approach will lead medicine in demonstrating how emerging technologies can be responsibly and effectively implemented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 680-691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147357287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CT Staging of Colon Cancer: Reproducibility and Pathology Association in a Multicenter Study. 结肠癌的CT分期:多中心研究的可重复性和病理关联。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.008
Jona Shkurti, Kevin B W Groot Lipman, Renaud L M Tissier, Kalina Chupetlovska, Eduardo H P Pooch, Margriet C van Dijk-de Haan, Milan E J Pijl, Mateus de Oliveira Taveira, Josephine C B M Huige, Maaike M P Gielens, Bart A R Tonino, Sanne B T van Rooij, Danique S Berenschot, Liën Coolen, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Joost Nederend

Rationale and objectives: To assess interobserver agreement of computed tomography (CT) features in colon cancer, their association with pathological staging, and the influence of baseline characteristics on clinical-pathological agreement.

Materials and methods: CT scans of patients with locally advanced colon cancer treated between 2011 and 2020 at two Dutch hospitals were analyzed. Eleven radiologists independently reviewed the scans in pairs using a structured template. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Krippendorff's alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Associations between CT features and pathological stages, and the impact of baseline characteristics on clinical-pathological agreement, were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression.

Results: Interobserver agreement was α = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.51-0.60) for T stage, α = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.61) for N stage, α = 0.44 (95% CI: 0.36-0.51) for retroperitoneal surgical margin, α = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.52-0.65) for bowel obstruction, α = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22-0.33) for extramural vascular invasion, α = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.14-0.31) for tumor deposits, ICC = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75) for tumor length, and ICC = 0.62 (95% CI: 0.58-0.65) for largest node diameter. Significant associations (P < 0.05) were observed between clinical cT, cN, tumor length, and cEMVI with pT, and between cN, node diameter, and node heterogeneity with pN. Age, tumor location, and differentiation grade significantly influenced agreement.

Conclusion: Several CT features were significantly associated with pathological stage, but their inconsistent interpretation across observers, indicates limited reliability for individualized treatment decisions. Interpretation should therefore focus on features with proven reproducibility, namely tumor length and largest node diameter, applied within standardized protocols, and integrated with the broader clinical and pathological context.

基本原理和目的:评估观察者对结肠癌计算机断层扫描(CT)特征的一致性,它们与病理分期的关系,以及基线特征对临床病理一致性的影响。材料和方法:对2011年至2020年在荷兰两家医院接受治疗的局部晚期结肠癌患者的CT扫描进行分析。11位放射科医生使用一个结构化模板成对地独立审查扫描结果。使用Krippendorff α (α)和类内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间的一致性。CT特征与病理分期之间的关系,以及基线特征对临床病理一致性的影响,采用混合效应逻辑回归进行评估。结果:Interobserver协议是α= 0.55(95%置信区间:0.51—-0.60)T阶段,α= 0.57(95%置信区间:0.52—-0.61)N阶段,α= 0.44(95%置信区间:0.36—-0.51)腹膜后手术,α= 0.59(95%置信区间:0.52—-0.65)肠阻塞,α= 0.27(95%置信区间:0.22—-0.33)市外的血管侵犯,α= 0.22(95%置信区间:0.14—-0.31)肿瘤存款,ICC = 0.72(95%置信区间:0.70—-0.75)肿瘤长度、和ICC = 0.62(95%置信区间:0.58—-0.65)直径最大的节点。临床cT、cN、肿瘤长度、cEMVI与pT、cN、淋巴结直径、淋巴结异质性与pN之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.05)。年龄、肿瘤位置和分化等级显著影响一致性。结论:一些CT特征与病理分期显著相关,但观察者对其解释不一致,表明个体化治疗决策的可靠性有限。因此,解释应侧重于具有可重复性的特征,即肿瘤长度和最大淋巴结直径,在标准化方案中应用,并与更广泛的临床和病理背景相结合。
{"title":"CT Staging of Colon Cancer: Reproducibility and Pathology Association in a Multicenter Study.","authors":"Jona Shkurti, Kevin B W Groot Lipman, Renaud L M Tissier, Kalina Chupetlovska, Eduardo H P Pooch, Margriet C van Dijk-de Haan, Milan E J Pijl, Mateus de Oliveira Taveira, Josephine C B M Huige, Maaike M P Gielens, Bart A R Tonino, Sanne B T van Rooij, Danique S Berenschot, Liën Coolen, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Joost Nederend","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To assess interobserver agreement of computed tomography (CT) features in colon cancer, their association with pathological staging, and the influence of baseline characteristics on clinical-pathological agreement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CT scans of patients with locally advanced colon cancer treated between 2011 and 2020 at two Dutch hospitals were analyzed. Eleven radiologists independently reviewed the scans in pairs using a structured template. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Krippendorff's alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Associations between CT features and pathological stages, and the impact of baseline characteristics on clinical-pathological agreement, were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interobserver agreement was α = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.51-0.60) for T stage, α = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.61) for N stage, α = 0.44 (95% CI: 0.36-0.51) for retroperitoneal surgical margin, α = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.52-0.65) for bowel obstruction, α = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22-0.33) for extramural vascular invasion, α = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.14-0.31) for tumor deposits, ICC = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75) for tumor length, and ICC = 0.62 (95% CI: 0.58-0.65) for largest node diameter. Significant associations (P < 0.05) were observed between clinical cT, cN, tumor length, and cEMVI with pT, and between cN, node diameter, and node heterogeneity with pN. Age, tumor location, and differentiation grade significantly influenced agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several CT features were significantly associated with pathological stage, but their inconsistent interpretation across observers, indicates limited reliability for individualized treatment decisions. Interpretation should therefore focus on features with proven reproducibility, namely tumor length and largest node diameter, applied within standardized protocols, and integrated with the broader clinical and pathological context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CT Radiogenomics Provides a Novel Factor for cM0(i+) Risk Stratification in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Model Linked to a Circulating Tumor Cell-Related Gene Signature. CT放射基因组学为局部肾细胞癌的cM0(i+)风险分层提供了一个新的因素:一个与循环肿瘤细胞相关基因标记相关的模型。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.016
Xiangyu Wang, Liyu He, Zihe Peng, Yuanchun Pu, Zhixin Huang, Mingrui Li, Minxin He, Ziyu Cao, Tie Chong

Rationale and objectives: cM0(i+) represents a pre-metastatic stage characterized by the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Although CTC monitoring could offer valuable prognostic insights, current strategies often lack flexibility, potentially increasing patient burden. Our study aims to investigate whether radiomic could provide a factor associated with cM0(i+) risk in localized renal cell carcinoma (LRCC) patients, which may contribute to risk-adapted monitoring strategies.

Materials and methods: GSE106363, GSE82198, GSE18670 and TCGA-KIRC (n=522) were used to identify CTC-related genes (CRGs) and construct a CTC risk stratification (CRS). Radiogenomic models were trained on CT imaging in TCIA (n=85) to predict the CRS, and its ability to stratify CTC burden and cM0(i+) progression risk was evaluated in our institutional cohort (n=82, median follow-up 192 days) undergoing postoperative CTC assessments by CanPatrol® approximately every three months, following the cM0(i+) criteria: total CTCs ≥6, mesenchymal CTCs ≥1, and a demonstrated trend of progression in either of total or mesenchymal CTCs.

Results: Three genes (CYFIP2, SLC19A1, and ENGASE) were identified as CRGs. The radiogenomic model accurately predicted the CRS [AUC = 0.82 (0.58 ∼ 0.96)] and provided an independent factor of cM0(i+)-free survival [HR = 3.20 (1.50 ∼ 6.85),1-year AUC = 0.79 (0.65 ∼ 0.92)]. Patients stratified as high-risk by the model exhibited significantly higher epithelial, mixed, and total CTC counts (p < 0.05) and increased risk of cM0(i+) progression (log-rank p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Our study proposes a novel factor derived from contrast-enhanced CT radiomics for stratifying cM0(i+) progression risk in LRCC, which may inform the development of risk-adapted CTC monitoring strategies in future studies.

理由和目的:cM0(i+)代表以循环肿瘤细胞(ctc)存在为特征的转移前阶段。尽管CTC监测可以提供有价值的预后见解,但目前的策略往往缺乏灵活性,可能会增加患者的负担。我们的研究旨在探讨放射组学是否可以提供与局限性肾细胞癌(LRCC)患者cM0(i+)风险相关的因素,这可能有助于风险适应监测策略。材料和方法:使用GSE106363、GSE82198、GSE18670和TCGA-KIRC (n=522)鉴定CTC相关基因(CRGs),构建CTC风险分层(CRS)。放射基因组学模型在TCIA (n=85)中进行CT成像训练,以预测CRS,并在我们的机构队列(n=82,中位随访192天)中评估其分层CTC负担和cM0(i+)进展风险的能力,这些队列大约每三个月进行一次CanPatrol®术后CTC评估,遵循cM0(i+)标准:总CTC≥6,间质CTC≥1,总CTC或间质CTC均有进展趋势。结果:三个基因(CYFIP2、SLC19A1和ENGASE)被鉴定为CRGs。放射基因组学模型准确预测了CRS [AUC = 0.82(0.58 ~ 0.96)],并提供了无cM0(i+)生存的独立因素[HR = 3.20(1.50 ~ 6.85),1年AUC = 0.79(0.65 ~ 0.92)]。被模型分层为高危的患者表现出更高的上皮、混合和总CTC计数(p < 0.05)和cM0(i+)进展的风险增加(log-rank p < 0.01)。结论:我们的研究提出了一种来自增强CT放射组学的新因子,用于分层LRCC的cM0(i+)进展风险,这可能为未来研究中风险适应性CTC监测策略的发展提供信息。
{"title":"CT Radiogenomics Provides a Novel Factor for cM0(i+) Risk Stratification in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Model Linked to a Circulating Tumor Cell-Related Gene Signature.","authors":"Xiangyu Wang, Liyu He, Zihe Peng, Yuanchun Pu, Zhixin Huang, Mingrui Li, Minxin He, Ziyu Cao, Tie Chong","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>cM0(i+) represents a pre-metastatic stage characterized by the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Although CTC monitoring could offer valuable prognostic insights, current strategies often lack flexibility, potentially increasing patient burden. Our study aims to investigate whether radiomic could provide a factor associated with cM0(i+) risk in localized renal cell carcinoma (LRCC) patients, which may contribute to risk-adapted monitoring strategies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>GSE106363, GSE82198, GSE18670 and TCGA-KIRC (n=522) were used to identify CTC-related genes (CRGs) and construct a CTC risk stratification (CRS). Radiogenomic models were trained on CT imaging in TCIA (n=85) to predict the CRS, and its ability to stratify CTC burden and cM0(i+) progression risk was evaluated in our institutional cohort (n=82, median follow-up 192 days) undergoing postoperative CTC assessments by CanPatrol® approximately every three months, following the cM0(i+) criteria: total CTCs ≥6, mesenchymal CTCs ≥1, and a demonstrated trend of progression in either of total or mesenchymal CTCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three genes (CYFIP2, SLC19A1, and ENGASE) were identified as CRGs. The radiogenomic model accurately predicted the CRS [AUC = 0.82 (0.58 ∼ 0.96)] and provided an independent factor of cM0(i+)-free survival [HR = 3.20 (1.50 ∼ 6.85),1-year AUC = 0.79 (0.65 ∼ 0.92)]. Patients stratified as high-risk by the model exhibited significantly higher epithelial, mixed, and total CTC counts (p < 0.05) and increased risk of cM0(i+) progression (log-rank p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study proposes a novel factor derived from contrast-enhanced CT radiomics for stratifying cM0(i+) progression risk in LRCC, which may inform the development of risk-adapted CTC monitoring strategies in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association Between MRI Case Volume and Confidence in Interpretation Among Current and Recently Graduated Canadian Diagnostic Radiology Residents. 在当前和最近毕业的加拿大诊断放射学居民中,MRI病例量与解释的信心之间的关系。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.002
Courtney Cheng, Natasha Larocque, William Warnica, Yoan K Kagoma

Rationale and objectives: As the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continues to grow, it is essential for radiology trainees to develop the confidence and expertise to interpret MRI studies effectively. However, residents have reported inadequate MRI training, often citing limited case volume as a key contributor. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between MRI case volume and confidence in MRI interpretation among diagnostic radiology residents, and to identify factors influencing both case volumes and confidence.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of MRI case volume between 2018 and 2023 and online survey was performed among current residents and recent graduates of a Canadian diagnostic radiology residency program.

Results: There was a significant strong positive association between current residents' MRI case volume and confidence in MRI interpretation (r = 0.9, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.7-1.0), and a trend toward a moderate positive correlation among recent graduates (r = 0.4, P = 0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.7). Participants reported structured MRI rotations, resident proactivity, and staff interest and availability for teaching as key factors influencing resident MRI case volume and confidence in MRI interpretation.

Conclusion: Increased MRI case volumes are associated with greater confidence in MRI interpretation among diagnostic radiology residents. Additional factors, such as dedicated subspeciality MRI rotations, resident initiative, and staff engagement, also play a crucial role.

基本原理和目标:随着磁共振成像(MRI)的使用不断增长,对放射学受训人员来说,培养有效解释MRI研究的信心和专业知识至关重要。然而,住院医师报告MRI培训不足,通常以有限的病例量为主要原因。本研究旨在评估诊断放射科居民MRI病例量与MRI解释置信度之间的关系,并确定影响病例量和置信度的因素。材料和方法:对2018年至2023年的MRI病例量进行回顾性回顾,并对加拿大诊断放射学住院医师项目的现有住院医师和近期毕业生进行在线调查。结果:当前居民的MRI病例量与MRI解释的置信度之间存在显著的强正相关(r = 0.9, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.7-1.0),并且在应届毕业生中呈中等正相关趋势(r = 0.4, P = 0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.7)。参与者报告了结构化的MRI轮转、住院医生的主动性、工作人员的兴趣和教学的可用性是影响住院医生MRI病例量和对MRI解释的信心的关键因素。结论:MRI病例量的增加与诊断放射学居民对MRI解释的更大信心有关。其他因素,如专门的亚专科MRI轮转、住院医生的主动性和工作人员的参与,也起着至关重要的作用。
{"title":"Association Between MRI Case Volume and Confidence in Interpretation Among Current and Recently Graduated Canadian Diagnostic Radiology Residents.","authors":"Courtney Cheng, Natasha Larocque, William Warnica, Yoan K Kagoma","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>As the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continues to grow, it is essential for radiology trainees to develop the confidence and expertise to interpret MRI studies effectively. However, residents have reported inadequate MRI training, often citing limited case volume as a key contributor. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between MRI case volume and confidence in MRI interpretation among diagnostic radiology residents, and to identify factors influencing both case volumes and confidence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of MRI case volume between 2018 and 2023 and online survey was performed among current residents and recent graduates of a Canadian diagnostic radiology residency program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant strong positive association between current residents' MRI case volume and confidence in MRI interpretation (r = 0.9, P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.7-1.0), and a trend toward a moderate positive correlation among recent graduates (r = 0.4, P = 0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.7). Participants reported structured MRI rotations, resident proactivity, and staff interest and availability for teaching as key factors influencing resident MRI case volume and confidence in MRI interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased MRI case volumes are associated with greater confidence in MRI interpretation among diagnostic radiology residents. Additional factors, such as dedicated subspeciality MRI rotations, resident initiative, and staff engagement, also play a crucial role.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on "Effect of ChatGPT-Assisted Reflective Reasoning on Guideline-Concordant Procedural Decision-Making Among Early-Career Interventional Radiologists". 对“chatgpt辅助反思推理对早期介入放射科医师指导一致性程序性决策的影响”的评论
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.026
Ali Salbas, Atilla Hikmet Cilengir
{"title":"Comment on \"Effect of ChatGPT-Assisted Reflective Reasoning on Guideline-Concordant Procedural Decision-Making Among Early-Career Interventional Radiologists\".","authors":"Ali Salbas, Atilla Hikmet Cilengir","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clarifying the Technical Context of ChatGPT-Assisted Reflective Reasoning in Interventional Radiology Training. 澄清介入放射学培训中chatgpt辅助反思推理的技术背景。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.027
Yunus Yasar, Mustafa Demir, Ali Canturk, Safa Ozyilmaz, Ahmet Harun Turgan, Yusuf Agackaya
{"title":"Clarifying the Technical Context of ChatGPT-Assisted Reflective Reasoning in Interventional Radiology Training.","authors":"Yunus Yasar, Mustafa Demir, Ali Canturk, Safa Ozyilmaz, Ahmet Harun Turgan, Yusuf Agackaya","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reading, Fast and Slow: Characterizing Radiologists' Visual Search Through Abdominal CT for Detecting Hepatic Metastases. 阅读,快与慢:放射科医生通过腹部CT检测肝转移的视觉搜索特征。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.018
Parvathy Sudhir Pillai, Scott S Hsieh, Hao Gong, Andrew Vercnocke, David A Cook, David R Holmes, Jeff L Fidler, Rickey E Carter, Shuai Leng, Lifeng Yu, Cynthia H McCollough, Joel G Fletcher

Rationale and objectives: Previous studies suggest that "drilling" (eyes fixated at one location within a slice while scrolling rapidly between computed tomography (CT) slices) may be more effective than "scanning" (eyes move rapidly to search within each slice while scrolling slowly between slices) for detecting lesions, but evidence has been limited. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between sensitivity and either drilling or scanning for liver metastasis detection.

Materials and methods: Twenty-five radiologists blinded to clinical and previous imaging information marked all suspected hepatic metastases in 40 contrast-enhanced liver CT exams while being monitored by eye-tracking technology. Eye movements were registered to the corresponding liver segment and slice. All livers and proven metastases were demarcated into Couinaud segments. Outcome measures included metastasis detection (sensitivity), interpretation time, average rate of scrolling, and average rate of segment change.

Results: There were 91 metastases, and mean sensitivity was 83%. In univariate analysis, higher reader sensitivity was associated with longer interpretation time (adjusted R2 = 0.35, regression coefficient = 5.25, p = 0.002) and smaller segment change rate (i.e., drilling) (adjusted R2 = 0.23, regression coefficient = -4.54, p = 0.009). Scrolling rate was not associated with sensitivity (p=0.37). A regression model predicting sensitivity from both interpretation time and segment change rate yielded an adjusted R2 of 0.43.

Conclusion: Drilling may outperform scanning in sensitivity for detection of liver metastases when measured as segment change rate, but not as scrolling rate. Longer interpretation time is independently associated with higher sensitivity.

基本原理和目的:先前的研究表明,“钻孔”(眼睛盯着一个切片内的一个位置,同时在计算机断层扫描(CT)切片之间快速滚动)可能比“扫描”(眼睛在每个切片内快速移动搜索,同时在切片之间缓慢滚动)更有效地检测病变,但证据有限。本研究的目的是研究敏感性与钻取或扫描检测肝转移之间的关系。材料和方法:25名不了解临床和既往影像学信息的放射科医生在40次肝CT造影检查中标记了所有疑似肝转移,同时使用眼动追踪技术进行监测。眼球运动记录在相应的肝段和切片上。所有肝脏和已证实的转移灶被划分为Couinaud节段。结果测量包括转移检测(敏感性)、解释时间、平均滚动率和平均节段改变率。结果:转移91例,平均敏感性83%。在单变量分析中,较高的解读器灵敏度与较长的解读时间(调整R2 = 0.35,回归系数= 5.25,p = 0.002)和较小的片段变化率(即钻孔)(调整R2 = 0.23,回归系数= -4.54,p = 0.009)相关。滚动率与灵敏度无关(p=0.37)。根据解释时间和片段变化率预测敏感性的回归模型的调整R2为0.43。结论:钻孔法检测肝转移的灵敏度优于扫描法检测肝转移的灵敏度,但不优于扫描法检测肝转移的灵敏度。较长的解释时间与较高的灵敏度独立相关。
{"title":"Reading, Fast and Slow: Characterizing Radiologists' Visual Search Through Abdominal CT for Detecting Hepatic Metastases.","authors":"Parvathy Sudhir Pillai, Scott S Hsieh, Hao Gong, Andrew Vercnocke, David A Cook, David R Holmes, Jeff L Fidler, Rickey E Carter, Shuai Leng, Lifeng Yu, Cynthia H McCollough, Joel G Fletcher","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.018","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Previous studies suggest that \"drilling\" (eyes fixated at one location within a slice while scrolling rapidly between computed tomography (CT) slices) may be more effective than \"scanning\" (eyes move rapidly to search within each slice while scrolling slowly between slices) for detecting lesions, but evidence has been limited. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between sensitivity and either drilling or scanning for liver metastasis detection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-five radiologists blinded to clinical and previous imaging information marked all suspected hepatic metastases in 40 contrast-enhanced liver CT exams while being monitored by eye-tracking technology. Eye movements were registered to the corresponding liver segment and slice. All livers and proven metastases were demarcated into Couinaud segments. Outcome measures included metastasis detection (sensitivity), interpretation time, average rate of scrolling, and average rate of segment change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 91 metastases, and mean sensitivity was 83%. In univariate analysis, higher reader sensitivity was associated with longer interpretation time (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.35, regression coefficient = 5.25, p = 0.002) and smaller segment change rate (i.e., drilling) (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.23, regression coefficient = -4.54, p = 0.009). Scrolling rate was not associated with sensitivity (p=0.37). A regression model predicting sensitivity from both interpretation time and segment change rate yielded an adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.43.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drilling may outperform scanning in sensitivity for detection of liver metastases when measured as segment change rate, but not as scrolling rate. Longer interpretation time is independently associated with higher sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12970606/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Validation of Radiomics and Clinical Models for Predicting Gleason Grades in Prostate Cancer Across Tumor Subregions and Clinical Factors: A Dual-Center Study. 基于肿瘤亚区和临床因素预测前列腺癌格里森分级的放射组学和临床模型的发展和验证:一项双中心研究。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.006
Li Liu, Peiyuan Yin, Mingbin Bao, Jun Wang, Binze Han, Yunsen He, Fulin Lu, Longlin Yin

Rationale and objectives: To assess the value of radiomics models and clinical models (CM) based on diverse volumes of interest and clinical indicators in differentiating low Gleason grade group (GGG) from high-GGG in prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods: This study included 312 PCa patients diagnosed pathologically from center 1 and center 2, divided into internal training (dataset A, n=144, center 1), internal validation (dataset B, n=63, center 1) and external test set (dataset C, n=105, center 2). The CM and radiomics models for intratumoral volume (ITV), 2 mm reduction from tumor border (CTV), 2 mm and 4 mm extensions beyond tumor border (PTV2, PTV4), and 4 mm peritumoral transition (PTT) were developed. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results: The combined model ITV_PTV4_CM1 demonstrated optimal performance (AUC 0.871 [95% confidence interval: 0.802-0.938] for dataset C), significantly outperformed ITV (0.778 [0.690-0.864]), and PTV4 (0.774 [0.681-0.866]), with all p < 0.05, and also better than CM1 (0.830 [0.753-0.905]). The introduction of ITV+PTV4, PSAD+PSA, and PSA all provide positive gains to model (NRI/IDI > 0, all p < 0). PTT with AUCs of 0.858 and 0.869 for datasets A and B, outperformed other individual radiomics models in center 1. ADC/DWI_gldm emerged as the top-weighted feature.

Conclusion: The ITV_PTV4_CM1 enhances predictive efficacy for preoperative PCa risk stratification. PTV4 and PTT highlight the importance of transition zone features at the peritumoral invasion margin, offering insights into optimal peritumoral extents. The similar efficacy of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics suggests strategies for optimizing PCa diagnostic workflow.

理由和目的:评估基于不同兴趣量和临床指标的放射组学模型和临床模型(CM)在区分前列腺癌(PCa)低Gleason分级组(GGG)和高GGG组(GGG)中的价值。材料和方法:本研究包括来自中心1和中心2的312例病理诊断的PCa患者,分为内部训练(数据集A, n=144,中心1)、内部验证(数据集B, n=63,中心1)和外部测试集(数据集C, n=105,中心2)。建立了肿瘤内体积(ITV)、肿瘤边界缩小2mm (CTV)、肿瘤边界延伸2mm和4mm (PTV2、PTV4)和肿瘤周围转移4mm (PTT)的CM和放射组学模型。采用曲线下面积(AUC)、净重分类改进(NRI)和综合判别改进(IDI)对模型性能进行评价。结果:组合模型ITV_PTV4_CM1表现出最优的性能(AUC为0.871[95%置信区间:0.802-0.938]),显著优于ITV(0.778[0.690-0.864])和PTV4 (0.774 [0.681-0.866]), p均< 0.05,也优于CM1(0.830[0.753-0.905])。ITV+PTV4、PSAD+PSA、PSA的引入均对模型产生正增益(NRI/IDI >,均p < 0)。数据集A和B的PTT auc分别为0.858和0.869,优于中心1的其他个体放射组学模型。ADC/DWI_gldm是最重要的特征。结论:ITV_PTV4_CM1可提高术前前列腺癌风险分层的预测效果。PTV4和PTT强调了肿瘤周围浸润边界过渡区特征的重要性,为最佳肿瘤周围范围提供了见解。肿瘤内和肿瘤周围放射组学的相似疗效提示了优化前列腺癌诊断流程的策略。
{"title":"Development and Validation of Radiomics and Clinical Models for Predicting Gleason Grades in Prostate Cancer Across Tumor Subregions and Clinical Factors: A Dual-Center Study.","authors":"Li Liu, Peiyuan Yin, Mingbin Bao, Jun Wang, Binze Han, Yunsen He, Fulin Lu, Longlin Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To assess the value of radiomics models and clinical models (CM) based on diverse volumes of interest and clinical indicators in differentiating low Gleason grade group (GGG) from high-GGG in prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 312 PCa patients diagnosed pathologically from center 1 and center 2, divided into internal training (dataset A, n=144, center 1), internal validation (dataset B, n=63, center 1) and external test set (dataset C, n=105, center 2). The CM and radiomics models for intratumoral volume (ITV), 2 mm reduction from tumor border (CTV), 2 mm and 4 mm extensions beyond tumor border (PTV2, PTV4), and 4 mm peritumoral transition (PTT) were developed. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined model ITV_PTV4_CM1 demonstrated optimal performance (AUC 0.871 [95% confidence interval: 0.802-0.938] for dataset C), significantly outperformed ITV (0.778 [0.690-0.864]), and PTV4 (0.774 [0.681-0.866]), with all p < 0.05, and also better than CM1 (0.830 [0.753-0.905]). The introduction of ITV+PTV4, PSAD+PSA, and PSA all provide positive gains to model (NRI/IDI > 0, all p < 0). PTT with AUCs of 0.858 and 0.869 for datasets A and B, outperformed other individual radiomics models in center 1. ADC/DWI_gldm emerged as the top-weighted feature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ITV_PTV4_CM1 enhances predictive efficacy for preoperative PCa risk stratification. PTV4 and PTT highlight the importance of transition zone features at the peritumoral invasion margin, offering insights into optimal peritumoral extents. The similar efficacy of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics suggests strategies for optimizing PCa diagnostic workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility of Half-Dose Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MRI at 5.0 T: A Prospective Intrapatient Comparison with Full-Dose 3.0 T. 半剂量加多西酸增强肝脏MRI 5.0 T的可行性:与全剂量3.0 T的前瞻性患者内比较。
IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.012
Yuannan Hu, Rufang Liao, Liejun Mei, Jinxiang Hu, Fenfang Zhou, Ming Deng, Haibo Xu

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine if half-dose gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 5.0 T is feasible by comparing with full-dose MRI at 3.0 T.

Materials and methods: 19 patients with liver disease underwent both full-dose (0.025 mmol/kg) gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and half-dose (0.0125 mmol/kg) 5.0-T MRI. Quantitative image quality was assessed by measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and contrast enhancement index (CEI) in liver and hepatic lesions. Qualitative image quality and respiratory motion artifacts were evaluated. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t-tests or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: Half dose 5.0-T MRI yielded significantly higher SNRs in liver and hepatic lesions compared to full-dose 3.0-T MRI (all P < 0.001). The 15-minute hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at 5.0 T achieved image quality comparable to 20-minute HBP at 3.0 T. Specifically, at the 15-minute HBP, the 5.0-T protocol demonstrated significantly higher liver SNR (77.24 ± 12.08 vs. 51.84 ± 8.18 at 20 min for 3.0 T; P < 0.001) and liver-to-lesion CNR (38.93 ± 15.56 vs. 25.37 ± 9.43; P < 0.01). Additionally, respiratory motion artifacts in the early arterial phase were significantly reduced at 5.0 T (1.12 ± 0.33 vs. 1.62 ± 0.86; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Liver 5.0-T MRI with a half-dose of gadoxetic acid maintains diagnostic image quality while enabling a 25% reduction in HBP acquisition time and mitigating motion artifacts. This technique represents a viable strategy to improve scanning efficiency and patient safety in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver imaging.

理由和目的:本研究旨在通过与3.0 T全剂量MRI比较,确定5.0 T时半剂量加多西酸增强肝脏磁共振成像(MRI)是否可行。材料和方法:19例肝病患者接受了全剂量(0.025 mmol/kg)加多西酸增强3.0 T MRI和半剂量(0.0125 mmol/kg) 5.0 T MRI。通过测量肝脏及肝脏病变的信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)和对比度增强指数(CEI),定量评价图像质量。定性图像质量和呼吸运动伪影进行了评估。统计学比较采用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验。结果:与全剂量3.0 t MRI相比,半剂量5.0 t MRI在肝脏和肝脏病变中的信噪比明显更高(均P < 0.001)。5.0 T下15分钟肝胆期(HBP)的图像质量与3.0 T下20分钟HBP相当。具体而言,5.0 T方案在15分钟HBP时,肝脏信噪比(77.24±12.08 vs. 51.84±8.18,P < 0.001)和肝脏到病变的CNR(38.93±15.56 vs. 25.37±9.43,P < 0.01)显著高于3.0 T下20分钟的HBP, P < 0.001)。5.0 T时,早期动脉期呼吸运动伪像明显减少(1.12±0.33∶1.62±0.86;P < 0.05)。结论:肝脏5.0-T MRI与半剂量的gadoxetic酸保持诊断图像质量,同时使HBP采集时间减少25%,减轻运动伪影。该技术代表了一种可行的策略,以提高扫描效率和患者的安全性,在加多etic酸增强肝脏成像。
{"title":"Feasibility of Half-Dose Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MRI at 5.0 T: A Prospective Intrapatient Comparison with Full-Dose 3.0 T.","authors":"Yuannan Hu, Rufang Liao, Liejun Mei, Jinxiang Hu, Fenfang Zhou, Ming Deng, Haibo Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2026.02.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine if half-dose gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 5.0 T is feasible by comparing with full-dose MRI at 3.0 T.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>19 patients with liver disease underwent both full-dose (0.025 mmol/kg) gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and half-dose (0.0125 mmol/kg) 5.0-T MRI. Quantitative image quality was assessed by measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and contrast enhancement index (CEI) in liver and hepatic lesions. Qualitative image quality and respiratory motion artifacts were evaluated. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t-tests or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half dose 5.0-T MRI yielded significantly higher SNRs in liver and hepatic lesions compared to full-dose 3.0-T MRI (all P < 0.001). The 15-minute hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at 5.0 T achieved image quality comparable to 20-minute HBP at 3.0 T. Specifically, at the 15-minute HBP, the 5.0-T protocol demonstrated significantly higher liver SNR (77.24 ± 12.08 vs. 51.84 ± 8.18 at 20 min for 3.0 T; P < 0.001) and liver-to-lesion CNR (38.93 ± 15.56 vs. 25.37 ± 9.43; P < 0.01). Additionally, respiratory motion artifacts in the early arterial phase were significantly reduced at 5.0 T (1.12 ± 0.33 vs. 1.62 ± 0.86; P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liver 5.0-T MRI with a half-dose of gadoxetic acid maintains diagnostic image quality while enabling a 25% reduction in HBP acquisition time and mitigating motion artifacts. This technique represents a viable strategy to improve scanning efficiency and patient safety in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Academic Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1