Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica最新文献

Introduction: Retransplantation is a rescue operation in orthotopic liver transplantation. Its appropriateness has been questioned on medical, economical and also on ethical grounds.

Material and methods: During the period february 1984-december 1997, 54 (14.5%) of 372 adult patients were retransplanted; three (0.8%) of them had two retransplantations. Indications were graft dysfunction [(primary non function (8x) and early dysfunction (14x in 13 patients)], immunological failure [acute (9x in 8 patients) and chronic (9x) rejection], technical failure [(hepatic artery thrombosis (5x in four patients), allograft decapsulation (1x), ischaemic biliary tract lesions (6x)] and recurrent viral allograft disease [HBV (4x) and HCV (1x)].

Results: Five year actuarial patient survival after retransplantation was 70.8%, which was identical to this of non retransplanted patients (72%). Early (< 3 mo) mortality was significantly lower in elective procedures (9.1%--2/22 pat. vs 34.4%--11/32 pat. in urgent procedures--p < 0.05). Mortality was highest in the graft dysfunction (23.8%, 5/21 pat.) and immunological failure (41%, 7/17 pat.) groups. Five of six patients retransplanted for rejection, whilst being on renal support, and two of three patients retransplanted urgently twice died of infectious complications. All patients retransplanted because of recurrent allograft disease were long-term (> 3 mo) survivors. Both HBV-infected patients died of allograft reinfection 7 months later; the two HBV-Delta infected patients were, free of infection, 44 and 6 months after retransplantation under HBV-immunoprophylaxis. Length of hospitalisation after primary transplantation and retransplantation were identical (median of 16 days--range 11 to 40 vs 14 days (range 7 to 110). Economical study during the period 1990-1995 showed that costs of the first hospitalization of primary transplantation and of retransplantation could be equalized during the period 1994-1995 as a consequence of the more frequent use of elective retransplantation (median 1.3 million BF, range 720,988 to 8,887,145 vs 1.1 million BF, range 943,685 to 1,940,409).

Conclusions: Hepatic retransplantation is a successful safety net for many liver transplant patients. Every effort should be made to do this intervention electively under minimal immunosuppression. In case of immunological graft failure and hepatic artery thrombosis retransplantation must be done early in order to avoid infectious complications; the same holds for ischaemic biliary tract lesions which cannot be cured by interventional radiology. Retransplantation for recurrent benign disease should be restricted to those diseases which can be effectively treated by (neo- and) adjuvant antiviral therapy.

Crohn's disease is rarely associated with Sweet's syndrome. We report a 32-year old woman who presented with diarrhea, fever and disseminated erythematous plaques on the arms and the trunk. After colonoscopy with biopsies, Crohn's disease was diagnosed. Skin biopsy showed a dense infiltration of neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes, establishing also the diagnosis of Sweet's syndrome. Crohn's disease is one of several systemic diseases that may underlie Sweet's syndrome. Treatment with methylprednisolone resulted in a rapid improvement of both gastro-intestinal symptoms and skin lesions.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) represent good indications for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While there is effective treatment for AIH (steroids with or without azathioprine) and PBC (ursodeoxycholic acid) no such treatment is currently established for PSC. The need of transplantation can be delayed for AIH and PBC with appropriate therapies, while treatment options for PSC are still controversially discussed. Although the time point for liver transplantation can be roughly estimated for AIH by failure of immunosuppressive therapy and for PBC by prognostic models, the prediction of survival in patients with PSC is more difficult, and further complicated by the risk of developing cholangiocellular carcinoma. Long term (5-year) outcome after liver transplantation approaches 80 to 90% for autoimmune liver diseases unless cholangiocellular carcinoma complicates PSC at the time of OLT. The risk of disease recurrence has been recognised for each of these entities although its clinical relevance is controversial and not exactly determined today. As survival after liver transplantation is steadily increasing, recurrent autoimmune liver disease may become a clinical problem in the future. Recently de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation has been reported from several transplant centres, although its importance still needs to be established.

This review article aims to discuss the modalities of oesophageal resection, to define the categories of patients who are most likely to benefit from oesophagectomy with extensive lymph node clearance, and to analyse the eventual contribution of nonsurgical neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapies to improving long-term survival rates achieved by surgery alone. Both the review of the literature devoted to potentially curative treatment of oesophageal cancer and the authors' own experience indicate that resection of the oesophageal tube en bloc with the locoregional lymph nodes provides patients with the best chance of long-term survival and cure. This is true, even though some of the resected lymph nodes are metastatic. Most phase III comparative studies fail to shown any overall survival improvement following multimodal therapy in comparison with surgery alone, so that there is now no scientific reason for systematic addition of radio- and/or chemotherapy to extensive surgery in potentially resectable neoplastic processes. However, neo-adjuvant radio- and/or chemotherapy is indicated in suspected non-resectable T4 tumors for downstaging and subsequent oesophageal resection in good responders. The benefit in terms of long-term survival and cure that can be expected from adjuvant chemo- and/or radiotherapy after radical resection of a neoplastic process having already spread into a large number of loco-regional lymph node requires objective evaluation by prospective, randomized studies.

Liver transplantation in pediatric patients represents about 10% of a total of 23,000 transplantations registered in the European Liver Transplantation Register (ELTR)since 1968. The pediatric patients show a specific spectrum of indications with cholestatic liver disorders ranking first, followed by hepatic based metabolic disorders. There has been a significant improvement of survival in transplantation since the early 80ies. The overall survival standard is nowadays in the range of 80%. There is a trend towards even better results in metabolic disorders. The clinical presentation of liver disease caused by metabolic disorders shows a wide range from acute liver, cerebral, cardiac and renal failure to chronic end stage liver, kidney and heart disease potentially complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma. In many cases, the diagnosis of a underlying metabolic disorder is very difficult and time consuming so the decision to do a liver transplantation may be necessary before a final diagnosis is established. Having these problems in mind, the consideration of absolute and relative contraindications for liver transplantation in metabolic disorders is even more difficult than it is already in cholestatic or inflammatory liver disorders. The individual evaluation of a patient suffering from a hepatic metabolic disorder must consider in addition the often dramatic restriction of quality of life due to rigorous dietary restrictions or other therapies. This makes clear that suitable methods to measure quality of life must be developed and applied in order to fulfill this goal. The extension of indications for liver transplantation even to disorders with only partial defects in otherwise healthy livers was possible by using innovative surgical techniques such as partial, living related, split, in situ split and auxiliary orthotopic transplantation. These techniques allowed to reduce the mortality on pediatric waiting lists significantly without restricting the general donor pool. However, living related liver transplantation is handicaped by the heterozygous status of the parent donor. This plays a role especially in patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) and Wilson's disease.

The study concerns the maltase, saccharase, lactase and alkaline phosphatase activity in small intestinal biopsy specimens from 61 consecutively admitted, untreated, Caucasian cystic fibrosis patients. A group of 319 age matched controls admitted during the same time period for undefined gastrointestinal or nutritional disorders acted as the controls. In order to eliminate morphological damage as a confounding factor, the enzyme activities were studied in small intestinal biopsy specimens having both normal stereomicroscopic and histological features. It was shown that neither maltase nor saccharase activity was different in the two groups, in contrast to lactase and alkaline phophatase activity, that was significantly lower in cystic fibrosis patients. The differences could not be explained by the nutritional status as judged by the body mass index. Lactase activity is known to be easily affected by numerous enteropathies. As the information on alkaline phosphatase activity is limited, the low activity is discussed in more detail. Taking into account the literature data, the low alkaline phosphatase activity is tentatively attributed either to enhanced release from the brush border or to the faulty handling of alkaline phophatase protein in the post-golgi compartments secondary to the accumulation of incorrectly glycosylated CFTR in the same cell structures.