Purpose
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of available exercises for cancer-related symptoms in cancer survivors to provide references for healthcare professionals and clinicians.
Methods
This study was registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and PsycInfo were searched from their inception to 16 August 2024. Reference lists of included trials and related reviews, the U.S. National Library of Medicine Clinical Trial Registry Platform and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were also searched. Study selection, data extraction and risk of assessment were independently performed by two researchers. STATA software version 16.0 was adopted to conduct the network meta-analysis.
Results
A total of 277 trials with 21,018 participants were included. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve values indicated that the best exercise intervention for fatigue was aerobic exercise (75.6 %), for quality of life (84.5 %) and pain (77.2 %) was resistance exercise, for anxiety was mind-body exercise (89.6 %), for depression was multi-component exercise (93.3 %). Values of the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve indicated that the best exercise for fatigue was aerobic exercise (75.6 %); for quality of life (84.5 %) and pain (77.2 %), it was resistance exercise; for anxiety, it was mind-body exercise (89.6 %); and for depression, it was multi-component exercise (93.3 %).
Conclusions
Resistance exercise has the highest probability of being the optimal exercise type for reducing quality of life and sleep disturbances. In the future, more strictly designed trials are needed to verify the conclusions of this network meta-analysis.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
