Hye Soo Kim, Kyeong-A Yang, Hyemin Cho, Su Hwan Kim, Soon-Beom Hong
Objective: Research on the incidence trends of eating disorders remains limited in Asia. This study aims to analyze the annual incidence rates and incident case characteristics in the Korean general population.
Method: The National Health Insurance Service database was used to examine the incidence rates of eating disorders from 2012 to 2021. A total of 34,615 patients with incident eating disorders aged 0-49 years were analyzed. Comorbidity and medication analyses used a 2013-2020 subset. Linear regression analyses and Mann-Kendall trend tests were conducted to examine temporal trends across age and sex. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were applied for epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the 0-19 and ≥ 20 age groups.
Results: Adults' annual incidence rates increased over the study period (τ = 0.689, p = 0.007). The 20-24 age group had the highest incidence (16.75-38.38 per 100,000 person-years). Individuals aged 0-19 years showed a stable incidence rate (τ = 0.244, p = 0.371), although males aged 0-19 years demonstrated a decreasing trend (B = -0.272, SE = 0.091, p = 0.018, 95% CI = [-0.483, -0.061]). Mood and anxiety disorders were the most frequent comorbidities. The 0-19 age group more frequently utilized tertiary healthcare institutions. Antidepressants were prescribed more frequently than antipsychotics. Fluoxetine and aripiprazole were the most common antidepressant and antipsychotic, respectively.
Discussion: The findings show distinct age- and sex-specific patterns in eating disorder incidence, underscoring the need for a tailored approach. Worldwide differences may offer etiological insights. A limitation is the aggregation of eating disorder subtypes.
目的:对亚洲饮食失调发病率趋势的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在分析韩国普通人群的年发病率和病例特征。方法:采用国民健康保险服务数据库对2012 - 2021年饮食失调的发病率进行调查。本研究共分析了34,615例0 ~ 49岁的突发饮食失调患者。合并症和药物分析使用了2013-2020年的子集。采用线性回归分析和Mann-Kendall趋势检验来检验不同年龄和性别的时间趋势。0-19岁和≥20岁年龄组的流行病学和临床特征采用卡方和Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果:成年人的年发病率在研究期间增加(τ = 0.689, p = 0.007)。20-24岁年龄组发病率最高(16.75-38.38 / 10万人年)。0 ~ 19岁个体发病率稳定(τ = 0.244, p = 0.371), 0 ~ 19岁男性发病率呈下降趋势(B = -0.272, SE = 0.091, p = 0.018, 95% CI =[-0.483, -0.061])。情绪和焦虑障碍是最常见的合并症。0-19岁年龄组更多地利用三级保健机构。抗抑郁药比抗精神病药开得更频繁。氟西汀和阿立哌唑分别是最常见的抗抑郁药和抗精神病药。讨论:研究结果显示饮食失调的发病率有明显的年龄和性别差异,强调需要量身定制的方法。世界范围内的差异可能提供病因学上的见解。一个限制是饮食失调亚型的聚集。
{"title":"Age- and Sex-Specific Incidence Trends of Eating Disorders in South Korea: Insights From a Decade of National Health Insurance Data (2012-2021).","authors":"Hye Soo Kim, Kyeong-A Yang, Hyemin Cho, Su Hwan Kim, Soon-Beom Hong","doi":"10.1002/eat.70052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research on the incidence trends of eating disorders remains limited in Asia. This study aims to analyze the annual incidence rates and incident case characteristics in the Korean general population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The National Health Insurance Service database was used to examine the incidence rates of eating disorders from 2012 to 2021. A total of 34,615 patients with incident eating disorders aged 0-49 years were analyzed. Comorbidity and medication analyses used a 2013-2020 subset. Linear regression analyses and Mann-Kendall trend tests were conducted to examine temporal trends across age and sex. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were applied for epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the 0-19 and ≥ 20 age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults' annual incidence rates increased over the study period (τ = 0.689, p = 0.007). The 20-24 age group had the highest incidence (16.75-38.38 per 100,000 person-years). Individuals aged 0-19 years showed a stable incidence rate (τ = 0.244, p = 0.371), although males aged 0-19 years demonstrated a decreasing trend (B = -0.272, SE = 0.091, p = 0.018, 95% CI = [-0.483, -0.061]). Mood and anxiety disorders were the most frequent comorbidities. The 0-19 age group more frequently utilized tertiary healthcare institutions. Antidepressants were prescribed more frequently than antipsychotics. Fluoxetine and aripiprazole were the most common antidepressant and antipsychotic, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings show distinct age- and sex-specific patterns in eating disorder incidence, underscoring the need for a tailored approach. Worldwide differences may offer etiological insights. A limitation is the aggregation of eating disorder subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Individuals with eating disorders (EDs) often face significant barriers to accessing care, including prolonged waitlists and systemic delays. Digital interventions, such as mobile apps, offer a scalable way to enhance pre-treatment engagement during this high-risk period. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MI-Coach: ED, a program-led mobile app designed to support motivation among female-identifying individuals awaiting ED treatment.
Method: Twenty-three female-identifying individuals on waitlists at ED clinics across British Columbia, Canada, participated in a 4-week single-arm pilot trial of MI-Coach: ED. The app delivered motivational interviewing-informed content through seven sequential modules containing reflective exercises, psychoeducational articles, and psychologist-led videos. Feasibility was assessed via service-provider uptake, participant enrollment, engagement, and retention metrics. Acceptability was measured using the user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale and adapted Technology Acceptance Model ratings. Exploratory analyses descriptively examined pre-to-post changes in motivation and related symptoms.
Results: Feasibility was constrained at the service-provider level, with 6% of contacted sites agreeing to distribute study materials. At the participant level, 67.6% initiated app use and 44% completed at least four modules, and 78% completed pre- and post-assessments, indicating partial engagement across the sample. Participants rated the app positively across domains of quality, ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Small-to-medium reductions in global ED severity and depressive symptoms, as well as increases in motivational confidence, were observed with confidence intervals that did not cross zero. Change scores were moderately correlated across select motivational and symptom measures.
Discussion: Findings suggest that MI-Coach: ED was acceptable among users who engaged, while feasibility was substantially influenced by system-level recruitment constraints and variable participant engagement. Observed engagement patterns were lower than those reported for general mental health apps but consistent with prior digital ED intervention literature, underscoring the importance of disorder-specific feasibility benchmarks. Results will inform ongoing refinements and implementation strategies for a future randomized trial.
{"title":"A Program-Led Motivational App (MI-Coach: ED) for Eating Disorder Waitlists: Findings From a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Trial.","authors":"Amané Halicki-Asakawa, Emily Fuller, Maya Libben","doi":"10.1002/eat.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals with eating disorders (EDs) often face significant barriers to accessing care, including prolonged waitlists and systemic delays. Digital interventions, such as mobile apps, offer a scalable way to enhance pre-treatment engagement during this high-risk period. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of MI-Coach: ED, a program-led mobile app designed to support motivation among female-identifying individuals awaiting ED treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-three female-identifying individuals on waitlists at ED clinics across British Columbia, Canada, participated in a 4-week single-arm pilot trial of MI-Coach: ED. The app delivered motivational interviewing-informed content through seven sequential modules containing reflective exercises, psychoeducational articles, and psychologist-led videos. Feasibility was assessed via service-provider uptake, participant enrollment, engagement, and retention metrics. Acceptability was measured using the user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale and adapted Technology Acceptance Model ratings. Exploratory analyses descriptively examined pre-to-post changes in motivation and related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility was constrained at the service-provider level, with 6% of contacted sites agreeing to distribute study materials. At the participant level, 67.6% initiated app use and 44% completed at least four modules, and 78% completed pre- and post-assessments, indicating partial engagement across the sample. Participants rated the app positively across domains of quality, ease of use, and perceived usefulness. Small-to-medium reductions in global ED severity and depressive symptoms, as well as increases in motivational confidence, were observed with confidence intervals that did not cross zero. Change scores were moderately correlated across select motivational and symptom measures.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings suggest that MI-Coach: ED was acceptable among users who engaged, while feasibility was substantially influenced by system-level recruitment constraints and variable participant engagement. Observed engagement patterns were lower than those reported for general mental health apps but consistent with prior digital ED intervention literature, underscoring the importance of disorder-specific feasibility benchmarks. Results will inform ongoing refinements and implementation strategies for a future randomized trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This review aimed to quantify rates of uptake (treatment initiation), adherence (program completion), and attrition (study dropout) in randomized trials of digital eating disorder (ED) interventions, and to synthesize engagement reporting practices, their consistency, and associations with clinical outcomes.
Methods: Randomized trials of digital interventions (web, app, computerized, chatbots, etc.) delivered to people with diagnostic, subthreshold, or self-reported EDs were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to compute absolute rates of uptake, adherence, and attrition, while a narrative synthesis summarized engagement patterns and reporting.
Results: Forty-eight trials were included. The weighted mean uptake rate from 44 intervention conditions was 89.7% (95% PI = 67.0-97.0) and the weighted mean adherence rate from 14 intervention conditions was 41.8% (95% PI = 0.9-83.3). These estimates remained similar in a series of sensitivity analyses that adjusted for biases, outliers, and when limiting to specific clinical population groups. The weighted trial attrition rate was 23.3% (95% PI = 0.8-54.4); for intervention arms specificially it was 29.7% (95% PI = 9.7-62.3) and for waitlist arms it was 18.7% (95% PI = 4.6-52.3). Attrition was lower in trials that had human-participant interaction, offered therapeutic guidance, provided monetary reimbursement, tested a web/computer program (compared to a smartphone application), and had a longer follow-up (> 6 weeks). Reporting of engagement was inconsistent and heterogeneous, with nearly 90 different metrics recorded across trials. There was some evidence linking sustained user engagement to greater clinical benefit.
Conclusion: Findings offer practical benchmarks to inform future trial planning and highlight design elements that could be leveraged to enhance user engagement and retention.
目的:本综述旨在量化数字饮食失调(ED)干预的随机试验中的接受率(治疗开始)、依从性(项目完成)和损耗率(研究退出),并综合参与报告实践、其一致性以及与临床结果的关联。方法:纳入对诊断性、亚阈值性或自我报告性急症患者进行的数字干预(网络、应用程序、计算机化、聊天机器人等)的随机试验。随机效应荟萃分析用于计算绝对吸收率、依从性和流失率,而叙述性综合则总结了参与模式和报告。结果:纳入48项试验。44个干预条件的加权平均吸收率为89.7% (95% PI = 67.0 ~ 97.0), 14个干预条件的加权平均依从率为41.8% (95% PI = 0.9 ~ 83.3)。在一系列敏感性分析中,这些估计值在调整偏倚、异常值和限制特定临床人群时保持相似。加权试验损耗率为23.3% (95% PI = 0.8 ~ 54.4);干预组为29.7% (95% PI = 9.7-62.3),等待组为18.7% (95% PI = 4.6-52.3)。在有人类参与者互动、提供治疗指导、提供金钱补偿、测试网络/计算机程序(与智能手机应用程序相比)、随访时间较长(6周左右)的试验中,损耗较低。参与的报告是不一致的和异质的,在整个试验中记录了近90种不同的指标。有一些证据表明,持续的用户粘性与更大的临床效益有关。结论:调查结果为未来的试验计划提供了实用基准,并突出了可用于提高用户粘性和留存率的设计元素。
{"title":"Patterns of Uptake, Engagement, and Attrition in Randomized Controlled Trials of Digital Interventions for Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Claudia Liu, Cleo Anderson, Mariel Messer, Zoe McClure, Jake Linardon","doi":"10.1002/eat.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to quantify rates of uptake (treatment initiation), adherence (program completion), and attrition (study dropout) in randomized trials of digital eating disorder (ED) interventions, and to synthesize engagement reporting practices, their consistency, and associations with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized trials of digital interventions (web, app, computerized, chatbots, etc.) delivered to people with diagnostic, subthreshold, or self-reported EDs were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to compute absolute rates of uptake, adherence, and attrition, while a narrative synthesis summarized engagement patterns and reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight trials were included. The weighted mean uptake rate from 44 intervention conditions was 89.7% (95% PI = 67.0-97.0) and the weighted mean adherence rate from 14 intervention conditions was 41.8% (95% PI = 0.9-83.3). These estimates remained similar in a series of sensitivity analyses that adjusted for biases, outliers, and when limiting to specific clinical population groups. The weighted trial attrition rate was 23.3% (95% PI = 0.8-54.4); for intervention arms specificially it was 29.7% (95% PI = 9.7-62.3) and for waitlist arms it was 18.7% (95% PI = 4.6-52.3). Attrition was lower in trials that had human-participant interaction, offered therapeutic guidance, provided monetary reimbursement, tested a web/computer program (compared to a smartphone application), and had a longer follow-up (> 6 weeks). Reporting of engagement was inconsistent and heterogeneous, with nearly 90 different metrics recorded across trials. There was some evidence linking sustained user engagement to greater clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings offer practical benchmarks to inform future trial planning and highlight design elements that could be leveraged to enhance user engagement and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaitlin B Proctor, Brian P Vickery, William G Sharp
Pediatric patients with medical/developmental conditions face increased risk for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Diet-managed chronic illnesses may heighten risk for disordered eating, with emerging research finding medical symptoms predating disordered eating behaviors. Pediatric-onset immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy ("food allergy") is on the rise, affecting an astonishing 8% of US children. The relationship between food allergy and ARFID is puzzlingly understudied despite food allergy clearly altering the individual's relationship with food, posing continuous danger, and requiring persistent, fundamental eating changes to maintain safety. Food allergy is managed through strict dietary avoidance of allergen(s) and confers well-documented risk to psychosocial functioning. Dietary restriction exceeding medically required avoidance (as observed in ARFID) further compounds risk for adverse health and psychosocial impacts. In this Spotlight, our team of clinical researchers working at the intersection of ARFID and food allergy proposes a model identifying three areas of food allergy-specific impact that may drive the higher prevalence of ARFID within this population. Failure to successfully regulate these universal drivers to preserve daily functioning may precipitate the development of ARFID. We propose (1) unique characteristics of allergic reactions and medical treatment, (2) the impacts of chronic vigilance and avoidance, and (3) response to learning paradigms and physiological upregulation disrupt the development of feeding/eating for both patients and caregivers. Patients with food allergy + ARFID may also be especially vulnerable to iatrogenic harm from the imprecision of current allergy testing modalities. We outline the sparse literature on food allergy + ARFID comorbidity and call for ARFID-focused research in this area.
{"title":"When Medically Required Food Avoidance Goes Awry: A Conceptual Framework of ARFID as an Underrecognized Clinical Complication of Food Allergy.","authors":"Kaitlin B Proctor, Brian P Vickery, William G Sharp","doi":"10.1002/eat.70049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric patients with medical/developmental conditions face increased risk for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Diet-managed chronic illnesses may heighten risk for disordered eating, with emerging research finding medical symptoms predating disordered eating behaviors. Pediatric-onset immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy (\"food allergy\") is on the rise, affecting an astonishing 8% of US children. The relationship between food allergy and ARFID is puzzlingly understudied despite food allergy clearly altering the individual's relationship with food, posing continuous danger, and requiring persistent, fundamental eating changes to maintain safety. Food allergy is managed through strict dietary avoidance of allergen(s) and confers well-documented risk to psychosocial functioning. Dietary restriction exceeding medically required avoidance (as observed in ARFID) further compounds risk for adverse health and psychosocial impacts. In this Spotlight, our team of clinical researchers working at the intersection of ARFID and food allergy proposes a model identifying three areas of food allergy-specific impact that may drive the higher prevalence of ARFID within this population. Failure to successfully regulate these universal drivers to preserve daily functioning may precipitate the development of ARFID. We propose (1) unique characteristics of allergic reactions and medical treatment, (2) the impacts of chronic vigilance and avoidance, and (3) response to learning paradigms and physiological upregulation disrupt the development of feeding/eating for both patients and caregivers. Patients with food allergy + ARFID may also be especially vulnerable to iatrogenic harm from the imprecision of current allergy testing modalities. We outline the sparse literature on food allergy + ARFID comorbidity and call for ARFID-focused research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Eating disorders (EDs) often emerge in adolescence, but developmental trajectories across different core features remain largely unclear.
Method: The prospective, community-based study included N = 898 participants aged 9.5-17.5 years (47.6% female, age 11.8 ± 1.4 years) with annual follow-up over 2-6 (3.4 ± 1.2) years. Multivariate trajectories of binge eating, restraint, weight-compensatory behaviors (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Children), and body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS) derived from objective anthropometrics were analyzed using group-based multi-trajectory modeling (GBMTM) separately for girls and boys. ED and general psychopathology were used for validation and outcome comparisons.
Results: GBMTM identified five distinct trajectories of ED symptoms and BMI-SDS in girls and six in boys. Low-symptom trajectories at lower, normal, and higher BMI-SDS were most common and showed only mild, transient ED symptoms. In boys, trajectories were largely characterized by stable ED symptoms at different BMI-SDS levels, whereas in girls, ED symptoms showed more pronounced change over time. In both sexes, two high-risk subgroups reflected bulimic and binge-eating patterns and followed trajectories with elevated or increasing ED symptoms across ages, which in girls were particularly associated with increased ED and general psychopathology at last assessment.
Discussion: GBMTM results support the developmental specificity of bulimic/binge-eating syndromes and noneating-disordered overweight across adolescence. High-risk subgroups in both sexes-and their particularly unfavorable outcomes in girls-underscore the need for sex-specific early identification strategies that consider longitudinal constellations of multiple ED symptoms and weight status rather than single indicators.
{"title":"Multivariate Trajectories of Eating Disorder Symptoms and Weight Status in 10- to 17-Year-Old Children and Adolescents.","authors":"Anja Hilbert, Danielle Schewe, Andreas Hiemisch, Antje Körner, Wieland Kiess, Ricarda Schmidt","doi":"10.1002/eat.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Eating disorders (EDs) often emerge in adolescence, but developmental trajectories across different core features remain largely unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The prospective, community-based study included N = 898 participants aged 9.5-17.5 years (47.6% female, age 11.8 ± 1.4 years) with annual follow-up over 2-6 (3.4 ± 1.2) years. Multivariate trajectories of binge eating, restraint, weight-compensatory behaviors (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Children), and body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS) derived from objective anthropometrics were analyzed using group-based multi-trajectory modeling (GBMTM) separately for girls and boys. ED and general psychopathology were used for validation and outcome comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GBMTM identified five distinct trajectories of ED symptoms and BMI-SDS in girls and six in boys. Low-symptom trajectories at lower, normal, and higher BMI-SDS were most common and showed only mild, transient ED symptoms. In boys, trajectories were largely characterized by stable ED symptoms at different BMI-SDS levels, whereas in girls, ED symptoms showed more pronounced change over time. In both sexes, two high-risk subgroups reflected bulimic and binge-eating patterns and followed trajectories with elevated or increasing ED symptoms across ages, which in girls were particularly associated with increased ED and general psychopathology at last assessment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>GBMTM results support the developmental specificity of bulimic/binge-eating syndromes and noneating-disordered overweight across adolescence. High-risk subgroups in both sexes-and their particularly unfavorable outcomes in girls-underscore the need for sex-specific early identification strategies that consider longitudinal constellations of multiple ED symptoms and weight status rather than single indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The relationship between resilience and eating disorder psychopathology among adolescents has been understudied. This study assessed prospective associations between baseline resilience and subsequent eating disorder psychopathology in a nationally representative longitudinal cohort of Japanese adolescents.
Method: We conducted a prospective cohort study with participants in grades 5-9 (10-15 years; n = 987) drawn from the Japan Adolescent and Youth longitudinal study. In 2021, resilience was measured using the Rasch-validated version of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure, while eating disorder psychopathology was assessed at the 2022 follow-up using the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire adapted for children. Both instruments were child-reported. Linear regression examined relationships between resilience scores and eating disorder psychopathology, adjusting for grade and maternal education.
Results: Higher overall resilience (β = -0.116; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.198, -0.034), personal resilience (-0.113; 95% CI: -0.196, -0.031), and caregiver resilience (-0.109; 95% CI: -0.192, -0.026) were each significantly associated with lower eating disorder psychopathology scores. Higher caregiver resilience was significantly associated with lower levels of restraint over eating (-0.093; 95% CI: -0.179, -0.006), while higher personal resilience was significantly associated with lower levels of guilt about eating (-0.103; 95% CI: -0.200, -0.005).
Discussion: Higher resilience was associated with fewer eating disorder symptoms among adolescents. Personal resilience was observed to be more salient for some symptoms, while caregiver resilience was more salient for others. These findings highlight the multifaceted role of resilience and suggest that interventions may benefit from strengthening both adolescents' individual coping resources and the supportive capacities of caregivers.
{"title":"Resilience and Disordered Eating Among Japanese Adolescents: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Nihaal Rahman, Kazue Ishitsuka, Aurélie Piedvache, Makiko Sampei, Naho Morisaki","doi":"10.1002/eat.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relationship between resilience and eating disorder psychopathology among adolescents has been understudied. This study assessed prospective associations between baseline resilience and subsequent eating disorder psychopathology in a nationally representative longitudinal cohort of Japanese adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study with participants in grades 5-9 (10-15 years; n = 987) drawn from the Japan Adolescent and Youth longitudinal study. In 2021, resilience was measured using the Rasch-validated version of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure, while eating disorder psychopathology was assessed at the 2022 follow-up using the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire adapted for children. Both instruments were child-reported. Linear regression examined relationships between resilience scores and eating disorder psychopathology, adjusting for grade and maternal education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher overall resilience (β = -0.116; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.198, -0.034), personal resilience (-0.113; 95% CI: -0.196, -0.031), and caregiver resilience (-0.109; 95% CI: -0.192, -0.026) were each significantly associated with lower eating disorder psychopathology scores. Higher caregiver resilience was significantly associated with lower levels of restraint over eating (-0.093; 95% CI: -0.179, -0.006), while higher personal resilience was significantly associated with lower levels of guilt about eating (-0.103; 95% CI: -0.200, -0.005).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Higher resilience was associated with fewer eating disorder symptoms among adolescents. Personal resilience was observed to be more salient for some symptoms, while caregiver resilience was more salient for others. These findings highlight the multifaceted role of resilience and suggest that interventions may benefit from strengthening both adolescents' individual coping resources and the supportive capacities of caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taylor L Rezeppa, Vittoria Trolio, Lilian P Palmer, Stefania Yee, Lauren Breithaupt, Megan Kuhnle, Julia Gydus, Kristine Hauser, Franziska Plessow, Kamryn T Eddy, Madhusmita Misra, Nadia Micali, Jennifer J Thomas, Elizabeth A Lawson, Helen Burton-Murray, Kendra R Becker
Objective: Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) involves restrictive eating driven by sensory sensitivity, low interest in food, or fear of negative consequences of eating. ARFID affects males and females equally and presents across the weight spectrum. Leptin, an anorexigenic hormone linked to adiposity, may contribute to low hunger and early satiety in ARFID. Prior findings indicate low leptin levels in low-weight females with ARFID; however, the role of leptin in ARFID across weight status and sex remains unknown. We hypothesized that youth with full/subthreshold ARFID, including a subgroup of low-weight males, would exhibit lower fasting leptin levels than healthy controls (HCs). We explored cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between leptin and clinical characteristics.
Method: Participants were youth aged 10-23 years (BMI percentile M [SD] = 41.4 (33.6)) with full/subthreshold ARFID (n = 95; 49.5% female) and HCs (n = 28; 50.0% female). At baseline, participants completed questionnaires, a fasted blood draw, and a diagnostic interview for ARFID, readministered at 1- and 2year follow-ups.
Results: Leptin levels did not differ between ARFID and HC groups. Low-weight ARFID males had significantly lower leptin than HC males (η2 = 0.258); however, this difference was nonsignificant after adjusting for BMI percentile. Leptin showed medium-to-large positive associations with age, BMI, and anxiety but not appetite or ARFID severity. Baseline leptin did not predict symptom or weight changes longitudinally.
Discussion: Hypoleptinemia was only evident in low-weight ARIFD and strongly correlated with BMI percentile. However, relationships with anxiety may suggest additional roles of leptin in underlying ARFID psychopathology. Findings should be replicated in larger, more representative samples.
{"title":"Serum Leptin in Youth and Young Adults With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Across the Weight Spectrum.","authors":"Taylor L Rezeppa, Vittoria Trolio, Lilian P Palmer, Stefania Yee, Lauren Breithaupt, Megan Kuhnle, Julia Gydus, Kristine Hauser, Franziska Plessow, Kamryn T Eddy, Madhusmita Misra, Nadia Micali, Jennifer J Thomas, Elizabeth A Lawson, Helen Burton-Murray, Kendra R Becker","doi":"10.1002/eat.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) involves restrictive eating driven by sensory sensitivity, low interest in food, or fear of negative consequences of eating. ARFID affects males and females equally and presents across the weight spectrum. Leptin, an anorexigenic hormone linked to adiposity, may contribute to low hunger and early satiety in ARFID. Prior findings indicate low leptin levels in low-weight females with ARFID; however, the role of leptin in ARFID across weight status and sex remains unknown. We hypothesized that youth with full/subthreshold ARFID, including a subgroup of low-weight males, would exhibit lower fasting leptin levels than healthy controls (HCs). We explored cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between leptin and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were youth aged 10-23 years (BMI percentile M [SD] = 41.4 (33.6)) with full/subthreshold ARFID (n = 95; 49.5% female) and HCs (n = 28; 50.0% female). At baseline, participants completed questionnaires, a fasted blood draw, and a diagnostic interview for ARFID, readministered at 1- and 2year follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leptin levels did not differ between ARFID and HC groups. Low-weight ARFID males had significantly lower leptin than HC males (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.258); however, this difference was nonsignificant after adjusting for BMI percentile. Leptin showed medium-to-large positive associations with age, BMI, and anxiety but not appetite or ARFID severity. Baseline leptin did not predict symptom or weight changes longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Hypoleptinemia was only evident in low-weight ARIFD and strongly correlated with BMI percentile. However, relationships with anxiety may suggest additional roles of leptin in underlying ARFID psychopathology. Findings should be replicated in larger, more representative samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Renée A Broersma, Moniek A J Zeegers, Jesse Roest, Ramon J L Lindauer, Fabienne Harteveld, Peer van der Helm, James Lock, Mark Assink
Objective: Although international treatment guidelines for eating disorders recommend varying psychological approaches for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN), most existing reviews have combined adolescent and adult samples, leaving the overall evidence base for this population poorly defined. This systematic review is the first to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological treatments for adolescents with AN across outpatient, inpatient, and day-patient settings.
Method: A systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, APA PsycINFO) identified 22 relevant studies through June 2025. Eligible studies focused on adolescents (ages 8-18 years) with AN undergoing psychological treatment.
Results: Evidence from the nine RCTs consistently indicates that family therapy produces significant positive effects on somatic parameters (e.g., weight) and short-term eating-disorder symptoms. In four, mostly underpowered comparative RCTs, outpatient family therapy showed small-to-moderate effect sizes over individual therapy, though these were restricted to outcomes related to medical recovery. For inpatient care, a limited evidence base suggests that shorter inpatient treatment followed by outpatient care may achieve outcomes comparable to extended hospitalization. Psychological modules delivered during inpatient treatment (e.g., Cognitive Remediation Therapy, CBT-Insomnia) showed some improvements confined to narrow symptom domains but did not translate into broader recovery.
Conclusion: The evidence base remains limited, with few RCTs in adolescents with AN and a geographically narrow, demographically homogeneous sample, predominantly girls from Western settings. Family therapy is supported as the first-line treatment, yet substantial uncertainties persist. Larger and more inclusive RCTs are needed to clarify mechanisms of change, long-term outcomes, and the effectiveness of individual-focused approaches.
目的:尽管国际饮食失调治疗指南推荐对患有神经性厌食症(AN)的青少年采用不同的心理治疗方法,但大多数现有综述将青少年和成人样本结合起来,使得这一人群的总体证据基础定义不清。本系统综述首次综合了门诊、住院和日间青少年AN心理治疗的随机对照试验(rct)。方法:系统检索数据库(例如PubMed, APA PsycINFO),确定了截至2025年6月的22项相关研究。符合条件的研究集中在接受心理治疗的AN青少年(8-18岁)。结果:9项随机对照试验的证据一致表明,家庭治疗对躯体参数(如体重)和短期饮食失调症状有显著的积极影响。在四项大多效力不足的对照随机对照试验中,门诊家庭治疗比个体治疗显示出小到中等的效果,尽管这些结果仅限于与医疗康复相关的结果。对于住院治疗,有限的证据基础表明,较短的住院治疗后再进行门诊治疗可能达到与延长住院治疗相当的结果。在住院治疗期间提供的心理模块(例如,认知补救疗法,cbt -失眠)在狭窄的症状领域显示出一些改善,但没有转化为更广泛的恢复。结论:证据基础仍然有限,针对AN青少年的随机对照试验很少,而且样本地域狭窄,人口统计学上同质,主要是来自西方国家的女孩。家庭治疗作为一线治疗得到支持,但仍存在很大的不确定性。需要更大规模、更具包容性的随机对照试验来阐明变化机制、长期结果和以个体为重点的方法的有效性。
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Psychological Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa in Adolescents: A Critical Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Renée A Broersma, Moniek A J Zeegers, Jesse Roest, Ramon J L Lindauer, Fabienne Harteveld, Peer van der Helm, James Lock, Mark Assink","doi":"10.1002/eat.70031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although international treatment guidelines for eating disorders recommend varying psychological approaches for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN), most existing reviews have combined adolescent and adult samples, leaving the overall evidence base for this population poorly defined. This systematic review is the first to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological treatments for adolescents with AN across outpatient, inpatient, and day-patient settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, APA PsycINFO) identified 22 relevant studies through June 2025. Eligible studies focused on adolescents (ages 8-18 years) with AN undergoing psychological treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence from the nine RCTs consistently indicates that family therapy produces significant positive effects on somatic parameters (e.g., weight) and short-term eating-disorder symptoms. In four, mostly underpowered comparative RCTs, outpatient family therapy showed small-to-moderate effect sizes over individual therapy, though these were restricted to outcomes related to medical recovery. For inpatient care, a limited evidence base suggests that shorter inpatient treatment followed by outpatient care may achieve outcomes comparable to extended hospitalization. Psychological modules delivered during inpatient treatment (e.g., Cognitive Remediation Therapy, CBT-Insomnia) showed some improvements confined to narrow symptom domains but did not translate into broader recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence base remains limited, with few RCTs in adolescents with AN and a geographically narrow, demographically homogeneous sample, predominantly girls from Western settings. Family therapy is supported as the first-line treatment, yet substantial uncertainties persist. Larger and more inclusive RCTs are needed to clarify mechanisms of change, long-term outcomes, and the effectiveness of individual-focused approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Long Khanh-Dao Le, Eng Joo Tan, Phillipa Hay, Jaithri Ananthapavan, Yong Yi Lee, Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Objective: Prevention programs for eating disorders (EDs) have the potential to reduce the onset of these diseases and improve the mental health and well-being of the general population. However, there is mixed evidence on whether routine implementation of such programs at the population level is cost-effective. This study intends to investigate the cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based preventive intervention for EDs, the Body Project, at the population level.
Method: The Body Project is a targeted school-based intervention that aims to prevent EDs among adolescents. A Markov model was developed to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the hypothetical implementation of the Body Project among female-identifying secondary students in Australia versus a 'no intervention' comparator. A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a "healthcare and limited education" sector perspective with costs and health impacts modeled over the lifetime of the target population. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per health-adjusted life year (HALY) gained, was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were done to test model assumptions.
Results: If implemented across 1416 Australian secondary schools, the modeled Body Project consisting of four group sessions for eligible girls aged 15-18 years with high body image concerns was estimated to yield about 92 HALYs (95% CI: 58-131) and save $2.56 million in future healthcare costs at an implementation cost of $1.88 million (95% CI: $1.62-$2.15 million).
Discussion: The Body Project intervention is likely to represent good value for money. Successful implementation of this program will require further research into its feasibility and acceptability among schools and the wider community.
{"title":"The Prevention of Eating Disorders in Australian Adolescents: A Modeled Cost-Effectiveness Study.","authors":"Long Khanh-Dao Le, Eng Joo Tan, Phillipa Hay, Jaithri Ananthapavan, Yong Yi Lee, Cathrine Mihalopoulos","doi":"10.1002/eat.70048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prevention programs for eating disorders (EDs) have the potential to reduce the onset of these diseases and improve the mental health and well-being of the general population. However, there is mixed evidence on whether routine implementation of such programs at the population level is cost-effective. This study intends to investigate the cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based preventive intervention for EDs, the Body Project, at the population level.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Body Project is a targeted school-based intervention that aims to prevent EDs among adolescents. A Markov model was developed to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the hypothetical implementation of the Body Project among female-identifying secondary students in Australia versus a 'no intervention' comparator. A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a \"healthcare and limited education\" sector perspective with costs and health impacts modeled over the lifetime of the target population. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per health-adjusted life year (HALY) gained, was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were done to test model assumptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>If implemented across 1416 Australian secondary schools, the modeled Body Project consisting of four group sessions for eligible girls aged 15-18 years with high body image concerns was estimated to yield about 92 HALYs (95% CI: 58-131) and save $2.56 million in future healthcare costs at an implementation cost of $1.88 million (95% CI: $1.62-$2.15 million).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Body Project intervention is likely to represent good value for money. Successful implementation of this program will require further research into its feasibility and acceptability among schools and the wider community.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Claire K Pinson, Kathryn R Fox, Guido K W Frank, Jill M Hooley, Kristin N Javaras
Objective: The distinct associations of coaches' and teammates' beliefs about ideal body weight/shape with athletes' disordered eating remain unclear. This study examined how athletes' perceptions of their coaches' and teammates' weight- and shape-related beliefs were associated with eating disorder symptoms and body dissatisfaction among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) swimmers. We hypothesized that both perceived coaches' and teammates' beliefs would be significantly associated with eating disorder symptoms and body dissatisfaction.
Method: Participants were 190 in-season NCAA swimmers (81% female) who completed a newly developed brief questionnaire designed to assess perceived coach and teammate weight/shape-related beliefs (Coach and Teammate Weight/Shape Beliefs Questionnaire; CTWSBQ), as well as scales assessing eating disorder symptoms (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, EDE-Q) and thinness- and muscularity-related body dissatisfaction (ATHLETE Questionnaire Your Body and Sports subscale and Drive for Muscularity Scale, respectively). Multiple linear regression was used to model disordered eating as a function of CTWSBQ Teammate and Coach scores and covariates.
Results: Only the CTWSBQ Teammate score was significantly associated with EDE-Q Global (ΔR2 = 0.04) and ATHLETE (ΔR2 = 0.04) scores after adjustment for both demographic and psychological covariates. CTWSBQ Coach, but not Teammate, scores were significantly associated with Drive for Muscularity scores (ΔR2 = 0.02) after adjustment for covariates.
Discussion: Findings from this cross-sectional study suggest distinct patterns of association for perceived teammate versus coach weight/shape-related beliefs across eating disorder symptoms, thinness-related concerns, and muscularity-related concerns in NCAA swimmers. Future work should test these patterns prospectively and determine whether they can inform prevention and education content for athletes and coaches.
目的:教练员和队友的理想体重/体型信念与运动员饮食失调之间的显著相关性尚不清楚。这项研究调查了运动员对教练和队友的体重和体型的看法是如何与全国大学体育协会(NCAA)游泳运动员的饮食失调症状和身体不满联系在一起的。我们假设教练和队友的信念都与饮食失调症状和身体不满显著相关。方法:参与者为190名NCAA赛季游泳运动员(81%为女性),他们完成了一份新开发的简短问卷,旨在评估教练和队友的体重/体型相关信念(教练和队友体重/体型信念问卷;CTWSBQ),以及评估饮食失调症状的量表(饮食失调检查问卷,ed - q)和与瘦和肌肉相关的身体不满(运动员问卷你的身体和运动亚量表和肌肉化驱动量表)。采用多元线性回归对饮食失调进行建模,并将其作为CTWSBQ队友和教练得分和协变量的函数。结果:调整人口统计学和心理协变量后,只有CTWSBQ队友得分与EDE-Q Global (ΔR2 = 0.04)和ATHLETE (ΔR2 = 0.04)得分显著相关。调整协变量后,CTWSBQ Coach得分与Drive for muscular得分显著相关(ΔR2 = 0.02),而队友得分则不显著。讨论:这项横断面研究的结果表明,在NCAA游泳运动员中,与饮食失调症状、与瘦相关的担忧和与肌肉相关的担忧中,感知队友与教练体重/形状相关的信念存在明显的关联模式。未来的工作应该对这些模式进行前瞻性的测试,并确定它们是否可以为运动员和教练提供预防和教育内容。
{"title":"Perceived Coach and Teammate Weight/Shape-Related Beliefs and Disordered Eating in NCAA Swimmers.","authors":"Claire K Pinson, Kathryn R Fox, Guido K W Frank, Jill M Hooley, Kristin N Javaras","doi":"10.1002/eat.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The distinct associations of coaches' and teammates' beliefs about ideal body weight/shape with athletes' disordered eating remain unclear. This study examined how athletes' perceptions of their coaches' and teammates' weight- and shape-related beliefs were associated with eating disorder symptoms and body dissatisfaction among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) swimmers. We hypothesized that both perceived coaches' and teammates' beliefs would be significantly associated with eating disorder symptoms and body dissatisfaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 190 in-season NCAA swimmers (81% female) who completed a newly developed brief questionnaire designed to assess perceived coach and teammate weight/shape-related beliefs (Coach and Teammate Weight/Shape Beliefs Questionnaire; CTWSBQ), as well as scales assessing eating disorder symptoms (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, EDE-Q) and thinness- and muscularity-related body dissatisfaction (ATHLETE Questionnaire Your Body and Sports subscale and Drive for Muscularity Scale, respectively). Multiple linear regression was used to model disordered eating as a function of CTWSBQ Teammate and Coach scores and covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only the CTWSBQ Teammate score was significantly associated with EDE-Q Global (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.04) and ATHLETE (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.04) scores after adjustment for both demographic and psychological covariates. CTWSBQ Coach, but not Teammate, scores were significantly associated with Drive for Muscularity scores (ΔR<sup>2</sup> = 0.02) after adjustment for covariates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from this cross-sectional study suggest distinct patterns of association for perceived teammate versus coach weight/shape-related beliefs across eating disorder symptoms, thinness-related concerns, and muscularity-related concerns in NCAA swimmers. Future work should test these patterns prospectively and determine whether they can inform prevention and education content for athletes and coaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146068513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}