首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluation of the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain. A protocol for a randomised controlled trial 经颅直流电刺激联合整骨疗法治疗慢性非特异性腰痛的疗效评价。随机对照试验的方案
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100679
Danilo Armbrust , Carlos Luques Fonseca , Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont , Andrei Machado Viegas da Trindade , Hugo Pasin Neto , Claudia Santos Oliveira

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP).

Methods

This will be a randomized controlled clinical trial of three groups with blinded evaluators and participants. The study will be conducted at the at the Rehabilitation Center of the Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Participants

72 participants of both sexes, with CNSLBP.

Intervention

Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups, with 24 participants per group (Group 1: active tDCS + active OMT; Group 2: placebo tDCS + placebo OMT; Group 3: placebo tDCS + active OMT). Assessments will be conducted before and after the intervention protocol and 1 month after the end of the entire process. For tDCS, 10 sessions of 20 minutes over 2 weeks (5 sessions per week). OMT will be performed by an osteopath, with two consultations, one per week, before the first and sixth sessions of tDCS.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome will be the visual analog pain scale, and the Roland Morris disability and EuroQol-5D quality of life questionnaires will be used as secondary.

Analysis

The statistical analysis will be calculated using linear mixed models and based on intention-to-treat. The level of significance will be set at α = 5%.

目的探讨骨科手法治疗(OMT)联合经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗慢性非特异性腰痛(CNSLBP)的疗效。方法本研究为随机对照临床试验,分为三组,采用盲法评估者和参与者。这项研究将在巴西圣保罗圣保罗之家Misericórdia康复中心进行。参与者:72名男性和女性,患有CNSLBP。参与者将被随机分为三组,每组24名参与者(第一组:活跃tDCS +活跃OMT;第二组:安慰剂tDCS +安慰剂OMT;第三组:安慰剂tDCS +主动OMT)。评估将在干预方案前后以及整个过程结束后1个月进行。对于tDCS,每2周进行10次,每次20分钟(每周5次)。OMT将由整骨医生进行,每周一次,两次会诊,在第一次和第六次tDCS之前。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为视觉模拟疼痛量表,次要观察指标为Roland Morris残疾和EuroQol-5D生活质量问卷。分析统计分析将使用线性混合模型并基于意向治疗进行计算。显著性水平设为α = 5%。
{"title":"Evaluation of the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain. A protocol for a randomised controlled trial","authors":"Danilo Armbrust ,&nbsp;Carlos Luques Fonseca ,&nbsp;Arislander Jonathan Lopes Dumont ,&nbsp;Andrei Machado Viegas da Trindade ,&nbsp;Hugo Pasin Neto ,&nbsp;Claudia Santos Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100679","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This will be a randomized controlled clinical trial of three groups with blinded evaluators and participants. The study will be conducted at the at the Rehabilitation Center of the Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>72 participants of both sexes, with CNSLBP.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups, with 24 participants per group (Group 1: active tDCS + active OMT; Group 2: placebo tDCS + placebo OMT; Group 3: placebo tDCS + active OMT). Assessments will be conducted before and after the intervention protocol and 1 month after the end of the entire process. For tDCS, 10 sessions of 20 minutes over 2 weeks (5 sessions per week). OMT will be performed by an osteopath, with two consultations, one per week, before the first and sixth sessions of tDCS.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome will be the visual analog pain scale, and the Roland Morris disability and EuroQol-5D quality of life questionnaires will be used as secondary.</p></div><div><h3>Analysis</h3><p>The statistical analysis will be calculated using linear mixed models and based on intention-to-treat. The level of significance will be set at α = 5%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49875063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Views from Australian osteopaths and industry stakeholders about the profession: A qualitative study 来自澳大利亚整骨治疗师和行业利益相关者对该职业的看法:一项定性研究
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100676
C. Mastronardo, L. Muddle, A. Fazalbhoy

Background

The future health and longevity of the osteopathy profession relies heavily on its practitioners and industry stakeholders to support it. Possessing a deeper understanding of practitioner and stakeholder views of the profession may provide crucial insights into the wellbeing of the workforce and their perceived skills and expertise in the wider healthcare landscape.

Objective

To provide a review of current and emerging attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders towards the profession.

Methods

A qualitative approach using grounded theory explored the attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders. Purposive sampling identified 18 practitioners (Victoria 10, Western Australia 5, and New South Wales 3) and 6 external stakeholders. All participated in semi-structured focus groups. A constant comparative method followed data collection whereby repeated ideas formed the extraction of the emerging themes presented.

Results

Central themes for each group included: 1) practitioner wellbeing and 2) osteopathic skills and expertise. Subthemes included: 1) career sustainability and longevity for practitioners, and 2) osteopathy within the broader context of allied healthcare in Australia.

Conclusion

Threats to practitioner wellbeing included lack of early career support, limited career pathways, and uncertainty surrounding the future of the profession. External stakeholders echoed similar concerns regarding the future of the profession, acknowledging whilst osteopathy may play a sustainable role in managing the health and wellbeing of Australians, their skills and expertise are not unique nor exclusive to the profession, are under-evidenced, and undervalued by other healthcare professionals. Fostering a healthy and fulfilled workforce lies in securing a sustainable role for the profession by addressing these limitations.

骨科专业的未来健康和长寿在很大程度上依赖于其从业人员和行业利益相关者的支持。对从业者和利益相关者对专业的看法有更深入的了解,可以为更广泛的医疗保健领域的劳动力福利及其感知技能和专业知识提供重要见解。目的回顾当前和新兴的态度,信念和行为的澳大利亚整骨治疗师和支持外部利益相关者对职业。方法采用扎根理论的定性方法探讨了澳大利亚整骨治疗师和支持性外部利益相关者的态度、信念和行为。有目的抽样确定了18名从业人员(维多利亚州10名,西澳大利亚州5名,新南威尔士州3名)和6名外部利益相关者。所有人都参加了半结构化的焦点小组。在数据收集之后,经常采用比较方法,通过重复的想法形成对所提出的新主题的提取。结果各组的中心主题包括:1)从业者健康和2)整骨疗法技能和专业知识。副主题包括:1)从业人员的职业可持续性和寿命,以及2)在澳大利亚联合医疗保健的更广泛背景下的整骨疗法。结论:对从业人员健康的威胁包括缺乏早期职业支持、有限的职业路径和职业未来的不确定性。外部利益相关者对该行业的未来也表达了类似的担忧,他们承认,虽然整骨疗法可能在管理澳大利亚人的健康和福祉方面发挥着可持续的作用,但他们的技能和专业知识并不是该行业独有的,也不是排他性的,没有得到充分证明,被其他医疗保健专业人员低估了。培养一支健康和充实的劳动力队伍取决于通过解决这些限制,确保该专业发挥可持续的作用。
{"title":"Views from Australian osteopaths and industry stakeholders about the profession: A qualitative study","authors":"C. Mastronardo,&nbsp;L. Muddle,&nbsp;A. Fazalbhoy","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100676","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100676","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The future health and longevity of the osteopathy<span> profession relies heavily on its practitioners and industry stakeholders to support it. Possessing a deeper understanding of practitioner and stakeholder views of the profession may provide crucial insights into the wellbeing of the workforce and their perceived skills and expertise in the wider healthcare landscape.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide a review of current and emerging attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders towards the profession.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative approach using grounded theory explored the attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders. Purposive sampling identified 18 practitioners (Victoria 10, Western Australia 5, and New South Wales 3) and 6 external stakeholders. All participated in semi-structured focus groups. A constant comparative method followed data collection whereby repeated ideas formed the extraction of the emerging themes presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Central themes for each group included: 1) practitioner wellbeing and 2) osteopathic skills and expertise. Subthemes included: 1) career sustainability and longevity for practitioners, and 2) osteopathy within the broader context of allied healthcare in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Threats to practitioner wellbeing included lack of early career support, limited career pathways, and uncertainty surrounding the future of the profession. External stakeholders echoed similar concerns regarding the future of the profession, acknowledging whilst osteopathy may play a sustainable role in managing the health and wellbeing of Australians, their skills and expertise are not unique nor exclusive to the profession, are under-evidenced, and undervalued by other healthcare professionals. Fostering a healthy and fulfilled workforce lies in securing a sustainable role for the profession by addressing these limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76766408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor regarding: Thomson OP, and MacMillan A. What’s wrong with osteopathy? Intern J Osteopath Med. 2023;48:100659 致编辑关于:Thomson OP和MacMillan A.整骨疗法有什么问题?[J] .中华骨科杂志,2009;28 (8):1099 - 1099
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100675
Monica Noy
{"title":"Letter to the Editor regarding: Thomson OP, and MacMillan A. What’s wrong with osteopathy? Intern J Osteopath Med. 2023;48:100659","authors":"Monica Noy","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100675","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49875608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: There is nothing wrong with osteopathy 整骨疗法没有错
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100678
Patrick L.S. van Dun
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: There is nothing wrong with osteopathy","authors":"Patrick L.S. van Dun","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100678","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100678","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82242087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
‘More harm than good’ – A qualitative study exploring the attitudes and beliefs of a group of Italian osteopaths about spinal imaging in the management of patients with chronic low back pain “弊大于利”-一项定性研究探讨了一组意大利整骨医生对慢性腰痛患者脊柱成像管理的态度和信念
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100680
Luca Ogliari, Andrea Formica, Lorenzo Bettelli

Objectives

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and its related healthcare costs are constantly increasing. Imaging studies have limited clinical utility in managing this condition and their overuse can lead to negative effects on patients. Clinicians' and patients' misconceptions seem to be one of the main drivers of such unnecessary use. However, there is a lack of research investigating osteopaths' views on imaging. This study explored Italian osteopaths’ attitudes and beliefs towards imaging and its utilisation in the clinical evaluation and management of CLBP patients.

Methods

A qualitative study, using elements of constructivist grounded theory, was conducted by means of semi-structured interviews. A purposive sampling approach was used to recruit 14 osteopaths practising in Italy with clinical and educational experiences. Data were collected until real saturation, transcribed verbatim and coded by using qualitative thematic analysis identifying categories, concepts and themes.

Results

Two main themes were identified with seven subcategories. The overarching themes were 1) Clinical relevance and utility; 2) Interacting with the patient through a biopsychosocial perspective.

Conclusion

The findings highlight that imaging plays a marginal role in the interviewed osteopaths' clinical practice, except for ruling out red flags or contraindications for treatment. Participants have shown awareness about the potential negative effects of imaging in CLBP patients. They underlined the need to reassure and educate patients to minimise the psycho-behavioural impact of diagnostic investigations on patients’ condition and also to provide a clinical value of their use, especially in relation to the complex and multidimensional nature of CLBP.

目的慢性腰痛(CLBP)是全球致残的主要原因之一,其相关医疗费用不断增加。影像学研究在治疗这种疾病方面的临床应用有限,而且过度使用会对患者产生负面影响。临床医生和患者的误解似乎是这种不必要使用的主要驱动因素之一。然而,关于整骨医生对影像学的看法的研究缺乏。本研究探讨了意大利整骨医生对影像学的态度和信念,以及影像学在CLBP患者临床评估和管理中的应用。方法采用半结构化访谈的方法,运用建构主义扎根理论的要素进行定性研究。采用有目的的抽样方法招募14名在意大利执业的具有临床和教育经验的整骨治疗师。收集数据直到真正饱和,逐字转录并使用定性专题分析识别类别,概念和主题进行编码。结果确定了2个主要主题和7个小类别。总体主题是1)临床相关性和实用性;2)通过生物心理社会视角与患者互动。结论研究结果表明,除了排除危险信号或治疗禁忌症外,影像学在受访整骨医生的临床实践中起着边缘作用。参与者已经意识到CLBP患者影像学的潜在负面影响。他们强调有必要安抚和教育患者,将诊断调查对患者病情的心理行为影响降到最低,并提供其使用的临床价值,特别是涉及到CLBP的复杂性和多维性。
{"title":"‘More harm than good’ – A qualitative study exploring the attitudes and beliefs of a group of Italian osteopaths about spinal imaging in the management of patients with chronic low back pain","authors":"Luca Ogliari,&nbsp;Andrea Formica,&nbsp;Lorenzo Bettelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100680","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and its related healthcare costs are constantly increasing. Imaging studies have limited clinical utility in managing this condition and their overuse can lead to negative effects on patients. Clinicians' and patients' misconceptions seem to be one of the main drivers of such unnecessary use. However, there is a lack of research investigating osteopaths' views on imaging. This study explored Italian osteopaths’ attitudes and beliefs towards imaging and its utilisation in the clinical evaluation and management of CLBP patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative study, using elements of constructivist grounded theory, was conducted by means of semi-structured interviews. A purposive sampling approach was used to recruit 14 osteopaths practising in Italy with clinical and educational experiences. Data were collected until real saturation, transcribed verbatim and coded by using qualitative thematic analysis identifying categories, concepts and themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two main themes were identified with seven subcategories. The overarching themes were 1) Clinical relevance and utility; 2) Interacting with the patient through a biopsychosocial perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings highlight that imaging plays a marginal role in the interviewed osteopaths' clinical practice, except for ruling out red flags or contraindications for treatment. Participants have shown awareness about the potential negative effects of imaging in CLBP patients. They underlined the need to reassure and educate patients to minimise the psycho-behavioural impact of diagnostic investigations on patients’ condition and also to provide a clinical value of their use, especially in relation to the complex and multidimensional nature of CLBP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49875062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of osteopathic manipulative treatment in management of intractable singultus and associated symptoms 应用整骨手法治疗治疗顽固性独角症及相关症状
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100668
Rosalyn R. Bloch, Megan R. Kempa, J'Aimee Lippert

Background & objective

A 23-year-old female, with ongoing hiccups for five years, known as intractable singultus, was managed with osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to decrease her hiccup bouts and decrease the following associated symptoms: mid-thoracic back pain, nausea, vomiting, reflux, eructation, and abdominal pain. Unlike other documented OMT-managed singultus cases, this patient had no known chronic medical conditions, a limited past medical history, and the longest documented case of singultus to be treated with OMT.

Methods

The patient was evaluated at six visits, four including OMT. Areas of somatic dysfunction were treated with myofascial release, muscle energy technique, counterstrain, and high velocity low amplitude. Objective measures include patient-recorded singultus bouts before and after treatment.

Results

Prior to OMT, the patient averaged approximately 60 hiccups per day with a recorded maximum of 97 hiccups. After the first OMT session, the average number of daily hiccups was reduced nearly 50% (∼30 hiccups per day), and the maximum was reduced by approximately 39% (59 hiccups per day). Additionally, with the exception of mid-thoracic back pain, there was a reduction in associated symptoms of eructation, reflux, abdominal pain, nausea (resolved), and emesis (resolved), which improved the patient's quality of life.

Conclusions

There is little literature surrounding the applications of OMT in the management of chronic and intractable singultus. Thus, this case serves as a foundation for future publications. Based on this case, the authors propose that OMT appears to be a safe, noninvasive management option for patients with singultus, relieve associated symptoms, and potentially decrease singultus-related complications.

背景,目的:一名23岁的女性,持续打嗝5年,被称为顽固性呃逆,采用整骨手法治疗(OMT)来减少她的打嗝次数,并减少以下相关症状:胸中背部疼痛、恶心、呕吐、反流、嗳气和腹痛。与其他记录在案的OMT治疗的单直病例不同,该患者没有已知的慢性疾病,既往病史有限,是用OMT治疗时间最长的单直病例。方法对患者进行6次随访,其中4次为OMT。对躯体功能障碍部位采用肌筋膜释放、肌能技术、反张力和高速低振幅治疗。客观措施包括患者在治疗前后记录的单发发作情况。结果在OMT之前,患者平均每天打嗝约60次,记录最多打嗝97次。在第一次OMT治疗后,每天打嗝的平均次数减少了近50%(每天30次),最大次数减少了约39%(每天59次)。此外,除中胸背部疼痛外,呕吐、反流、腹痛、恶心(缓解)和呕吐(缓解)等相关症状均有所减轻,从而改善了患者的生活质量。结论OMT在慢性难治性单纯性鼻窦炎治疗中的应用文献较少。因此,这个案例可以作为未来出版物的基础。基于这一病例,作者提出OMT似乎是一种安全、无创的治疗选择,可以缓解相关症状,并潜在地减少与singultus相关的并发症。
{"title":"Use of osteopathic manipulative treatment in management of intractable singultus and associated symptoms","authors":"Rosalyn R. Bloch,&nbsp;Megan R. Kempa,&nbsp;J'Aimee Lippert","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100668","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; objective</h3><p>A 23-year-old female, with ongoing hiccups for five years, known as intractable singultus, was managed with osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to decrease her hiccup bouts and decrease the following associated symptoms: mid-thoracic back pain, nausea, vomiting, reflux, eructation, and abdominal pain. Unlike other documented OMT-managed singultus cases, this patient had no known chronic medical conditions, a limited past medical history, and the longest documented case of singultus to be treated with OMT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The patient was evaluated at six visits, four including OMT. Areas of somatic dysfunction were treated with myofascial release, muscle energy technique, counterstrain, and high velocity low amplitude. Objective measures include patient-recorded singultus bouts before and after treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Prior to OMT, the patient averaged approximately 60 hiccups per day with a recorded maximum of 97 hiccups. After the first OMT session, the average number of daily hiccups was reduced nearly 50% (∼30 hiccups per day), and the maximum was reduced by approximately 39% (59 hiccups per day). Additionally, with the exception of mid-thoracic back pain, there was a reduction in associated symptoms of eructation, reflux, abdominal pain, nausea (resolved), and emesis (resolved), which improved the patient's quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is little literature surrounding the applications of OMT in the management of chronic and intractable singultus. Thus, this case serves as a foundation for future publications. Based on this case, the authors propose that OMT appears to be a safe, noninvasive management option for patients with singultus, relieve associated symptoms, and potentially decrease singultus-related complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49875067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
OSCAR (Osteopathic Single CAse Research) – Assessing the effect of standard and biopsychosocial osteopathic management for patients with non-specific low back pain: Protocol for a Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) OSCAR(整骨疗法单例研究)-评估标准和生物心理社会整骨疗法治疗非特异性腰痛患者的效果:单例实验设计方案(SCED)
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100660
Jerry Draper-Rodi , Hilary Abbey , Kevin Brownhill , Steven Vogel

Background

Osteopathy has been shown to be effective in the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines recommend biopsychosocial care for chronic, complex musculoskeletal conditions, including non-specific LBP.

Objectives

This study has four aims: 1/to assess how patients with LBP improve after osteopathic treatment, both before and after an osteopath has completed a Biopsychosocial Pain Management course; 2/to assess if it is feasible and acceptable for osteopaths to receive weekly SCED data and use it to guide patient management; 3/to assess if it is acceptable for patients to submit daily data and discuss weekly summary with their osteopaths; and 4/to test feasibility for researchers in collecting, managing and storing large quantities of individual patient data.

Methods

A multiple baseline single case experimental design trial with up to 10 UK osteopaths with more than 15 years in practice and 60 patients will assess how change occurs as a result of osteopathic treatment for patients with non-specific LBP of more than 12 weeks’ duration. Statistical analysis will assess the degree and rate of change between baseline, intervention and follow-up periods, and whether differences in effect are observed after the osteopaths have completed the biopsychosocial patient management training course. Primary outcomes will be the Numeric Pain Rating and Patient Specific Function Scales, measured daily at baseline and for 6 weeks during the intervention stage, and weekly or fortnightly during a 12-week follow-up period.

Ethics

This research was approved by the University College of Osteopathy Research Ethics Committee.

背景骨病已被证明在治疗慢性腰痛(LBP)方面是有效的。指南建议对慢性、复杂的肌肉骨骼疾病进行生物心理社会护理,包括非特异性LBP。目的本研究有四个目的:1/评估LBP患者在整骨治疗后,在整骨医生完成生物心理社会疼痛管理课程前后的改善情况;2/评估整骨医生每周接受SCED数据并用于指导患者管理是否可行和可接受;3/评估患者提交每日数据并与骨科医生讨论每周总结是否可以接受;以及4/测试研究人员在收集、管理和存储大量患者个人数据方面的可行性。方法一项多基线单病例实验设计试验,由10名执业时间超过15年的英国骨科医生和60名患者组成,将评估持续时间超过12周的非特异性LBP患者在整骨治疗后的变化。统计分析将评估基线、干预和随访期间的变化程度和速度,以及整骨医生完成生物-心理-社会患者管理培训课程后是否观察到效果差异。主要结果将是数字疼痛评分和患者特异性功能量表,在基线时每天测量,在干预阶段测量6周,在12周的随访期内每周或每两周测量一次。伦理这项研究得到了大学骨病学院研究伦理委员会的批准。
{"title":"OSCAR (Osteopathic Single CAse Research) – Assessing the effect of standard and biopsychosocial osteopathic management for patients with non-specific low back pain: Protocol for a Single Case Experimental Design (SCED)","authors":"Jerry Draper-Rodi ,&nbsp;Hilary Abbey ,&nbsp;Kevin Brownhill ,&nbsp;Steven Vogel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100660","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osteopathy has been shown to be effective in the management of chronic low back pain (LBP). Guidelines recommend biopsychosocial care for chronic, complex musculoskeletal conditions, including non-specific LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study has four aims: 1/to assess how patients with LBP improve after osteopathic treatment, both before and after an osteopath has completed a Biopsychosocial Pain Management course; 2/to assess if it is feasible and acceptable for osteopaths to receive weekly SCED data and use it to guide patient management; 3/to assess if it is acceptable for patients to submit daily data and discuss weekly summary with their osteopaths; and 4/to test feasibility for researchers in collecting, managing and storing large quantities of individual patient data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multiple baseline single case experimental design trial with up to 10 UK osteopaths with more than 15 years in practice and 60 patients will assess how change occurs as a result of osteopathic treatment for patients with non-specific LBP of more than 12 weeks’ duration. Statistical analysis will assess the degree and rate of change between baseline, intervention and follow-up periods, and whether differences in effect are observed after the osteopaths have completed the biopsychosocial patient management training course. Primary outcomes will be the Numeric Pain Rating and Patient Specific Function Scales, measured daily at baseline and for 6 weeks during the intervention stage, and weekly or fortnightly during a 12-week follow-up period.</p></div><div><h3>Ethics</h3><p>This research was approved by the University College of Osteopathy Research Ethics Committee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49904198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WITHDRAWN:Regards 'What is wrong with osteopathy' Oliver P Thomson, Andrew MacMillan, IJOM, 13th March 2023 撤回:关于“整骨疗法有什么问题”,Oliver P Thomson, Andrew MacMillan, IJOM, 2023年3月13日
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100674
S. Barlow
{"title":"WITHDRAWN:Regards 'What is wrong with osteopathy' Oliver P Thomson, Andrew MacMillan, IJOM, 13th March 2023","authors":"S. Barlow","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100674","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80354881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“It's all about the story”. Osteopaths' experiences of exploring menopausal symptoms: A qualitative interview study “最重要的是故事。”整骨治疗师探讨更年期症状的经验:一项质性访谈研究
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100657
Nicoletta Gelli, Hilary Abbey

Background

The prevalence of natural menopause means that middle aged women seeking osteopathic treatment are likely to have symptoms, but it is unknown how osteopaths explore and give advice about it.

Aim

To explore osteopaths’ experiences of screening for symptoms of menopause and providing advice to climacteric patients.

Methods

Elements of interpretative Grounded Theory, via semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of six experienced osteopaths and constant comparative analysis to identify themes.

Results

Three themes emerged: Breaking the ice - describing the menopause as a sensitive topic with social, personal, and professional barriers to explore it; Personal - not so personal - revealing the influence of practitioners' personal experiences of the menopause; and Storytelling - illustrating osteopaths’ narratives about patient interactions.

Conclusions

The three themes combined flexibly to form partially overlapping therapeutic approaches, underpinned by participants' personal experience of the menopause and conception of osteopathy. Sharing Stories, where personal disclosure is leveraged to enhance the rapport, with links to the Communicator therapeutic approach; Telling Stories, where the absence of personal experience led to a de-personalised narrative and elements of the Treater approach; and Changing the Story, where personal experience plays no role and the focus is on patients’ empowerment (Educator approach). Further research is needed to explore findings on osteopaths without personal experience of menopause and to evaluate osteopaths’ training to address sensitive topics.

背景自然更年期的普遍性意味着寻求整骨治疗的中年女性可能会出现症状,但整骨医生是如何探索和提供建议的尚不清楚。方法解释性基础理论的要素,通过对六名经验丰富的整骨医生进行有目的的半结构化访谈,并进行持续的比较分析,以确定主题。结果出现了三个主题:破冰——将更年期描述为一个具有社会、个人和职业障碍的敏感话题;个人——而不是个人——揭示了从业者个人更年期经历的影响;以及讲故事——说明整骨医生对患者互动的叙述。结论这三个主题灵活地结合在一起,形成了部分重叠的治疗方法,并以参与者对更年期的个人经历和骨病的概念为基础。分享故事,利用个人披露来加强融洽关系,并链接到Communicator治疗方法;讲故事,个人经验的缺乏导致了叙事和治疗方法的非个性化元素;以及改变故事,个人经验不起作用,重点是患者赋权(教育者方法)。需要进一步的研究来探索没有更年期经历的整骨医生的发现,并评估整骨医生解决敏感话题的训练。
{"title":"“It's all about the story”. Osteopaths' experiences of exploring menopausal symptoms: A qualitative interview study","authors":"Nicoletta Gelli,&nbsp;Hilary Abbey","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100657","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The prevalence of natural menopause means that middle aged women seeking osteopathic treatment are likely to have symptoms, but it is unknown how osteopaths explore and give advice about it.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore osteopaths’ experiences of screening for symptoms of menopause and providing advice to climacteric patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Elements of interpretative Grounded Theory, via semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of six experienced osteopaths and constant comparative analysis to identify themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three themes emerged: <em>Breaking the ice -</em> describing the menopause as a sensitive topic with social, personal, and professional barriers to explore it; <em>Personal - not so personal</em> - revealing the influence of practitioners' personal experiences of the menopause; and <em>Storytelling -</em> illustrating osteopaths’ narratives about patient interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The three themes combined flexibly to form partially overlapping therapeutic approaches, underpinned by participants' personal experience of the menopause and conception of osteopathy. <em>Sharing Stories,</em> where personal disclosure is leveraged to enhance the rapport, with links to the Communicator therapeutic approach; <em>Telling Stories,</em> where the absence of personal experience led to a de-personalised narrative and elements of the Treater approach; and <em>Changing the Story</em>, where personal experience plays no role and the focus is on patients’ empowerment (Educator approach). Further research is needed to explore findings on osteopaths without personal experience of menopause and to evaluate osteopaths’ training to address sensitive topics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49904197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's wrong with osteopathy? 整骨疗法有什么问题?
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100659
Oliver P. Thomson , Andrew MacMillan

This commentary critically examines the foundational assumptions, practices and claimed distinctiveness upon which osteopathy was built and continues to be structured. Five areas which are considered to be highly problematic for osteopathy, namely its weak theoretical basis, inherent biomedicalism, monointerventionism, default practitioner-centredness and predilection for implausible mechanisms. It is argued that these areas require considerable reflection and action as if not remedied, they constitute a major threat to the development, unity and legitimacy of the osteopathic profession. Ongoing reconceptualisation of underpinning theories, assumptions and associated skills informed by current evidence and knowledge from disciplines outside of the osteopathic domain is necessary for professional maturation.

Implications for practice

  • Osteopathy's weak theoretical basis, biomedicalism, monointerventionism, practitioner-centredness and implausible mechanisms are problematic.

  • These constitute a major threat to the development, unity and legitimacy of osteopathy.

  • Ongoing critical reflection, practice reconceptualisation and research are needed for professional maturation.

  • Osteopaths should draw on theory and evidence from outside the osteopathic domain.

这篇评论批判性地审视了整骨疗法建立并继续构建的基本假设、实践和声称的独特性。骨病的五个领域被认为是高度有问题的,即其薄弱的理论基础、固有的生物医学主义、单干预主义、默认的以医生为中心和对难以置信的机制的偏好。有人认为,这些领域需要大量的反思和行动,因为如果不加以补救,它们对整骨专业的发展、团结和合法性构成了重大威胁。根据整骨领域以外学科的现有证据和知识,对基础理论、假设和相关技能进行持续的重新概念化是专业成熟所必需的。对实践的影响•骨病的理论基础薄弱、生物医学、单干预主义、以从业者为中心和难以置信的机制都是有问题的。•这些对整骨疗法的发展、统一和合法性构成了重大威胁。•专业成熟需要持续的批判性反思、实践重新概念化和研究。•骨科医生应该借鉴骨科领域之外的理论和证据。
{"title":"What's wrong with osteopathy?","authors":"Oliver P. Thomson ,&nbsp;Andrew MacMillan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100659","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This commentary critically examines the foundational assumptions, practices and claimed distinctiveness upon which osteopathy was built and continues to be structured. Five areas which are considered to be highly problematic for osteopathy, namely its weak theoretical basis, inherent biomedicalism, monointerventionism, default practitioner-centredness and predilection for implausible mechanisms. It is argued that these areas require considerable reflection and action as if not remedied, they constitute a major threat to the development, unity and legitimacy of the osteopathic profession. Ongoing reconceptualisation of underpinning theories, assumptions and associated skills informed by current evidence and knowledge from disciplines outside of the osteopathic domain is necessary for professional maturation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Osteopathy's weak theoretical basis, biomedicalism, monointerventionism, practitioner-centredness and implausible mechanisms are problematic.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>These constitute a major threat to the development, unity and legitimacy of osteopathy.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Ongoing critical reflection, practice reconceptualisation and research are needed for professional maturation.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Osteopaths should draw on theory and evidence from outside the osteopathic domain.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49904199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
期刊
International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1