首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Professional skill priorities: Comparison views of osteopathy industry professionals and osteopathy students 专业技能优先事项:骨病治疗行业专业人员与骨病治疗专业学生的观点比较
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100727
Lee Muddle, Dr Cindy J. O’Malley, Ieva Stupans (Professor)

Objective

This paper investigates the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of osteopathy students who had opportunity to engage with differing curriculum interventions focused on patient communication, and compare these with those of industry professionals.

Method

Three different osteopathy student cohorts had opportunity to engage with different communication curriculum interventions. Using focus group discussions, perceptions, attitudes, and experiences about patient centred care were gathered and thematically analysed using a realist lens. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with industry professionals to capture their perceptions, attitudes and experiences about patient centred care and compared to those of the students.

Results

Cohorts with zero or one semester of advanced communication curriculum displayed underdeveloped concepts about the professional skill sets needed of an osteopath, patient-centred care and confidence and readiness for supervised clinical practise. In stark contrast, the one cohort who had opportunity to engage with the full communication curriculum i.e. introductory and advanced displayed views about patient centred care closely aligned with the views of industry professionals, demonstrated advanced ideas about skill sets of an osteopath, and were eager to commence supervised clinical practise.

Conclusion

An explicit and appropriately integrated curriculum appears to expedite student confidence and maturity to align more closely with industry professional views regarding the skill priorities needed of an osteopath.

本文调查了有机会参与以患者沟通为重点的不同课程干预的骨病学学生的看法、态度和经验,并将这些看法、态度和经验与业内专业人士的看法、态度和经验进行了比较。通过焦点小组讨论,收集了对以患者为中心的护理的看法、态度和经验,并采用现实主义视角进行了专题分析。对行业专业人士进行了半结构式访谈,以了解他们对以患者为中心的护理的看法、态度和经验,并将其与学生的看法、态度和经验进行比较。结果零学期或一学期高级沟通课程的学生对骨科医生所需的专业技能组合、以患者为中心的护理、自信心以及在指导下进行临床实践的准备程度等方面的概念发展不足。与此形成鲜明对比的是,有机会学习全部沟通课程(即入门和进阶课程)的一组学生对以患者为中心的护理的看法与业内专业人士的看法非常一致,对骨科医生的技能组合表现出先进的理念,并渴望开始有指导的临床实践。
{"title":"Professional skill priorities: Comparison views of osteopathy industry professionals and osteopathy students","authors":"Lee Muddle,&nbsp;Dr Cindy J. O’Malley,&nbsp;Ieva Stupans (Professor)","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100727","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This paper investigates the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of osteopathy students who had opportunity to engage with differing curriculum interventions focused on patient communication, and compare these with those of industry professionals.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three different osteopathy student cohorts had opportunity to engage with different communication curriculum interventions. Using focus group discussions, perceptions, attitudes, and experiences about patient centred care were gathered and thematically analysed using a realist lens<strong>.</strong> Semi-structured interviews were conducted with industry professionals to capture their perceptions, attitudes and experiences about patient centred care and compared to those of the students.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cohorts with zero or one semester of advanced communication curriculum displayed underdeveloped concepts about the professional skill sets needed of an osteopath, patient-centred care and confidence and readiness for supervised clinical practise. In stark contrast, the one cohort who had opportunity to engage with the full communication curriculum i.e. introductory and advanced displayed views about patient centred care closely aligned with the views of industry professionals, demonstrated advanced ideas about skill sets of an osteopath, and were eager to commence supervised clinical practise.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An explicit and appropriately integrated curriculum appears to expedite student confidence and maturity to align more closely with industry professional views regarding the skill priorities needed of an osteopath.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100727"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000208/pdfft?md5=28b716475d1a01ddd6a8203e46f243ff&pid=1-s2.0-S1746068924000208-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141313631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceived benefits and limitations of game-based simulation education by osteopathy students in early clinical training: A preliminary mixed methods study 骨病学学生在早期临床培训中对基于游戏的模拟教育的益处和局限性的认知:一项初步的混合方法研究
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100726
Hakim Mhadhbi , Lluis M. Horta , Julian Ims , Jerry Draper-Rodi , Hazel Mansfield , Robert Shaw , Sandra Rinne , Tricia Cleland Silva , Eija Metsälä , Mathieu Ménard

Background

Game-based simulation education is becoming an integral component in healthcare programs. It is defined as any educational activity implying simulation procedures to recreate clinical scenarios. Previous studies have shown that simulation can improve patient safety by enhancing healthcare providers' competencies. However, few studies have investigated students' perceptions of simulation within osteopathic programs.

Aim

This study aimed to measure and compare Year three osteopathy students’ perceptions of a game-based simulation versus traditional clinical training.

Methods

Year three students at the end of their 12 weeks clinical training were invited to participate in this research project. This included filling out a Likert-based survey and semi-structured interviews. Three clinical training modalities were implemented and evaluated: a demonstration clinic, a video-streamed demonstration clinic, and a game-based simulation, the clinical battle.

Results

Sixty-seven Year three osteopathy students completed the surveys, and eight students were interviewed. The clinical battle was significantly felt as the most engaging, most useful to gain feedback, and least stressful of the three training modalities proposed (p < 0.05). The clinical battle was also perceived as similar to a demonstration clinic in formulating a diagnosis and for reflective practice (p > 0.05). The semi-structured interviews offered deep structured explanatory narratives drawn from thematic analyses. Five themes were identified: engagement, clinical reasoning improvement, stress, ideas for improving clinical training, and reflective practice and self-assessment.

Conclusion

The simulation-based training implemented in this study was positively perceived by students for their clinical education. Future research could focus on the effectiveness of game-based simulation versus traditional training on clinical competencies acquisition.

背景基于游戏的模拟教育正成为医疗保健项目中不可或缺的组成部分。它的定义是指任何通过模拟程序重现临床场景的教育活动。以往的研究表明,模拟教学可以提高医疗服务提供者的能力,从而改善患者安全。本研究旨在测量和比较骨病学三年级学生对基于游戏的模拟训练和传统临床训练的看法。方法邀请 12 周临床训练结束后的三年级学生参与本研究项目。这包括填写一份基于李克特的调查问卷和进行半结构化访谈。对三种临床培训模式进行了实施和评估:示范诊所、视频流示范诊所和基于游戏的模拟临床实战。结果67名骨病学三年级学生完成了调查,8名学生接受了访谈。在所提出的三种培训方式中,临床实战被认为最有吸引力、最有助于获得反馈、压力最小(p <0.05)。临床实战还被认为在诊断和反思实践方面与示范诊所相似(p >0.05)。半结构式访谈提供了主题分析得出的深层次结构化解释性叙述。研究发现了五个主题:参与、临床推理能力的提高、压力、改进临床培训的想法以及反思性实践和自我评估。今后的研究可重点关注基于游戏的模拟训练与传统训练在临床能力掌握方面的效果。
{"title":"Perceived benefits and limitations of game-based simulation education by osteopathy students in early clinical training: A preliminary mixed methods study","authors":"Hakim Mhadhbi ,&nbsp;Lluis M. Horta ,&nbsp;Julian Ims ,&nbsp;Jerry Draper-Rodi ,&nbsp;Hazel Mansfield ,&nbsp;Robert Shaw ,&nbsp;Sandra Rinne ,&nbsp;Tricia Cleland Silva ,&nbsp;Eija Metsälä ,&nbsp;Mathieu Ménard","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100726","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100726","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Game-based simulation education is becoming an integral component in healthcare programs. It is defined as any educational activity implying simulation procedures to recreate clinical scenarios. Previous studies have shown that simulation can improve patient safety by enhancing healthcare providers' competencies. However, few studies have investigated students' perceptions of simulation within osteopathic programs.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to measure and compare Year three osteopathy students’ perceptions of a game-based simulation versus traditional clinical training.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Year three students at the end of their 12 weeks clinical training were invited to participate in this research project. This included filling out a Likert-based survey and semi-structured interviews. Three clinical training modalities were implemented and evaluated: a <em>demonstration clinic</em>, a <em>video-streamed demonstration clinic</em>, and a game-based simulation, the <em>clinical battle</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-seven Year three osteopathy students completed the surveys, and eight students were interviewed. The <em>clinical battle</em> was significantly felt as the most engaging, most useful to gain feedback, and least stressful of the three training modalities proposed (p &lt; 0.05). The <em>clinical battle</em> was also perceived as similar to a <em>demonstration clinic</em> in formulating a diagnosis and for reflective practice (p &gt; 0.05). The semi-structured interviews offered deep structured explanatory narratives drawn from thematic analyses. Five themes were identified: engagement, clinical reasoning improvement, stress, ideas for improving clinical training, and reflective practice and self-assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The simulation-based training implemented in this study was positively perceived by students for their clinical education. Future research could focus on the effectiveness of game-based simulation versus traditional training on clinical competencies acquisition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100726"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141278646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Disproportionate Olympic Rings” – The usage of a biopsychosocial (BPS) framework of care when managing people with musculoskeletal pain by osteopaths in Aotearoa/New Zealand– A qualitative study "不相称的奥运五环"--奥特亚罗瓦/新西兰的骨科医生在管理肌肉骨骼疼痛患者时使用生物-心理-社会(BPS)护理框架--一项定性研究
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100728
Kesava Kovanur Sampath , Ben Darlow , Steve Tumilty , Warwick Shillito , Emma Fairs , Hemakumar Devan , Oliver P. Thomson

Objectives

To address chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain effectively, a multidimensional model of care such as the biopsychosocial (BPS) model may be required. However, to date, the incorporation of the BPS model into osteopathic practice by New Zealand (NZ) osteopaths is unknown. Hence, the aims of this study were to: 1) investigate the incorporation of the BPS model into osteopathic practice by NZ osteopaths; (2) explore the attitudes and perceptions about the BPS model among NZ osteopaths; and (3) investigate the barriers to implementing the BPS model in NZ osteopathic practice.

Design

In-depth interviews; data analysed using thematic analysis.

Setting

Online.

Participants

A total of 14 NZ registered osteopaths (mean age = 49; 57 % males).

Results

Thematic analysis revealed three major categories: BPS resistant, BPS open and BPS embracing. A ‘cactus fractal model’ was proposed in which knowledge about the BPS model informs the professional identity of osteopaths and therefore their interaction with the health system. This can take the form of a positive or a negative fractal model. Hence, education about the BPS model during undergraduate training or as CPD courses may be imperative.

Conclusions

Participants in this study held a range of views about the usage of the BPS model in their clinical practice. Although, there is still resistance in using the BPS model, emerging evidence indicate that NZ osteopaths are open and/or to embrace the BPS model.
目的为了有效解决慢性肌肉骨骼(MSK)疼痛问题,可能需要一种多维护理模式,如生物心理社会(BPS)模式。然而,迄今为止,新西兰(NZ)骨科医生将 BPS 模式纳入骨科治疗实践的情况尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的在于1) 调查新西兰骨科医生将 BPS 模式纳入骨科治疗实践的情况;(2) 探讨新西兰骨科医生对 BPS 模式的态度和看法;(3) 调查在新西兰骨科治疗实践中实施 BPS 模式的障碍:结果专题分析显示出三大类别:BPS 抵抗型、BPS 开放型和 BPS 拥抱型。我们提出了一个 "仙人掌分形模型",在这个模型中,有关 BPS 模型的知识会影响骨科医生的专业身份,从而影响他们与医疗系统的互动。这可以采取积极或消极分形模型的形式。因此,在本科生培训或持续专业发展课程中开展有关 BPS 模式的教育可能势在必行。尽管在使用 BPS 模式方面仍存在阻力,但新出现的证据表明,新西兰骨科医生对 BPS 模式持开放和/或接受态度。
{"title":"“Disproportionate Olympic Rings” – The usage of a biopsychosocial (BPS) framework of care when managing people with musculoskeletal pain by osteopaths in Aotearoa/New Zealand– A qualitative study","authors":"Kesava Kovanur Sampath ,&nbsp;Ben Darlow ,&nbsp;Steve Tumilty ,&nbsp;Warwick Shillito ,&nbsp;Emma Fairs ,&nbsp;Hemakumar Devan ,&nbsp;Oliver P. Thomson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100728","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100728","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To address chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain effectively, a multidimensional model of care such as the biopsychosocial (BPS) model may be required. However, to date, the incorporation of the BPS model into osteopathic practice by New Zealand (NZ) osteopaths is unknown. Hence, the aims of this study were to: 1) investigate the incorporation of the BPS model into osteopathic practice by NZ osteopaths; (2) explore the attitudes and perceptions about the BPS model among NZ osteopaths; and (3) investigate the barriers to implementing the BPS model in NZ osteopathic practice.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In-depth interviews; data analysed using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Online.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A total of 14 NZ registered osteopaths (mean age = 49; 57 % males).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thematic analysis revealed three major categories: BPS resistant, BPS open and BPS embracing. A ‘cactus fractal model’ was proposed in which knowledge about the BPS model informs the professional identity of osteopaths and therefore their interaction with the health system. This can take the form of a positive or a negative fractal model. Hence, education about the BPS model during undergraduate training or as CPD courses may be imperative.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Participants in this study held a range of views about the usage of the BPS model in their clinical practice. Although, there is still resistance in using the BPS model, emerging evidence indicate that NZ osteopaths are open and/or to embrace the BPS model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100728"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142572822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Primary and secondary prevention of musculoskeletal pain and disability in chiropractic, osteopathy, and physiotherapy: A scoping review 脊骨神经科、整骨疗法和物理疗法中肌肉骨骼疼痛和残疾的一级和二级预防:范围界定综述
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100725
Jerry Draper-Rodi , Tristan Delion , Andrew MacMillan , Alexander I. Storey , Jonathan Spadaccini , Wahida Jebi , Oliver P. Thomson , David Hohenschurz-Schmidt

Background

Musculoskeletal prevention is a key priority in public health and for national health systems due to the increasing number of people living with persistent conditions, including musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints. There is no robust review of the evidence on COP interventions and MSK prevention, such as what the current state of conceptual debate is about a possible role of COP interventions in prevention, where and how this has been studied, and what the evidence for effectiveness is.

Objectives

A scoping review was conducted to chart and appraise the available evidence regarding primary and secondary prevention in MSK care in the chiropractic, osteopathic and physiotherapy (COP) professions.

Methods

The review was prospectively registered (https://osf.io/bqe5x/). Studies were eligible if they were primary quantitative research on COP interventions for primary and secondary prevention, delivered in clinical settings, and to patients of any age who were asymptomatic or had any MSK pain or disability. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted in duplicate by independent reviewers. The data was synthesised narratively.

Results

Twenty-one articles were included in the final synthesis: 17 randomized controlled trials, 3 cross sectional studies, and 1 experimental study. Studies were mostly moderate-quality clinical trials (n = 17) on manual therapy (n = 14) for low back pain (n = 10) that measured prevention by assessing healthcare use (n = 14) or symptom recurrence (n = 11). Heterogeneity of methods, low numbers, and mixed quality did not allow for conclusions about the effectiveness of COP interventions in preventing MSK complaints.

Conclusions

The evidence base is heterogeneous and of moderate quality making clinical recommendations challenging, but future research priorities have been identified, including a need for further research into primary, but mostly in secondary and tertiary prevention in COP; future research in COP should be designed in line with best practices and existing guidelines; and a need for the development and validation of reliable tools to stratify risks and management options.

背景肌肉骨骼预防是公共卫生和国家卫生系统的一个重要优先事项,因为越来越多的人患有持续性疾病,包括肌肉骨骼(MSK)疾病。目前还没有关于脊骨神经科干预和MSK预防的有力证据综述,例如关于脊骨神经科干预在预防中可能发挥的作用的概念辩论现状如何,在哪里以及如何对此进行研究,有效性的证据是什么等。目的 通过范围界定综述,对脊骨神经科、整骨疗法和物理疗法(COP)专业中MSK护理的一级和二级预防方面的现有证据进行梳理和评估。符合条件的研究应是在临床环境中针对无症状或有任何 MSK 疼痛或残疾的任何年龄段患者进行的 COP 一级和二级预防干预的主要定量研究。筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估由独立审稿人重复进行。结果21篇文章被纳入最终综述:17项随机对照试验、3项横断面研究和1项实验研究。研究多为中等质量的临床试验(17 项),涉及腰背痛的手法治疗(14 项)(10 项),通过评估医疗保健的使用(14 项)或症状复发(11 项)来衡量预防效果。由于方法不一、数量较少且质量参差不齐,因此无法就慢性阻塞性肺病干预措施在预防 MSK 病症方面的有效性得出结论。结论证据基础不一且质量中等,因此临床建议具有挑战性,但已确定了未来的研究重点,包括需要进一步研究慢性阻塞性肺病的一级预防,但主要是二级和三级预防;未来的慢性阻塞性肺病研究应根据最佳实践和现有指南进行设计;需要开发和验证可靠的工具来对风险和管理方案进行分层。
{"title":"Primary and secondary prevention of musculoskeletal pain and disability in chiropractic, osteopathy, and physiotherapy: A scoping review","authors":"Jerry Draper-Rodi ,&nbsp;Tristan Delion ,&nbsp;Andrew MacMillan ,&nbsp;Alexander I. Storey ,&nbsp;Jonathan Spadaccini ,&nbsp;Wahida Jebi ,&nbsp;Oliver P. Thomson ,&nbsp;David Hohenschurz-Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100725","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100725","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Musculoskeletal prevention is a key priority in public health and for national health systems due to the increasing number of people living with persistent conditions, including musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints. There is no robust review of the evidence on COP interventions and MSK prevention, such as what the current state of conceptual debate is about a possible role of COP interventions in prevention, where and how this has been studied, and what the evidence for effectiveness is.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted to chart and appraise the available evidence regarding primary and secondary prevention in MSK care in the chiropractic, osteopathic and physiotherapy (COP) professions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The review was prospectively registered (<span>https://osf.io/bqe5x/</span><svg><path></path></svg>). Studies were eligible if they were primary quantitative research on COP interventions for primary and secondary prevention, delivered in clinical settings, and to patients of any age who were asymptomatic or had any MSK pain or disability. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted in duplicate by independent reviewers. The data was synthesised narratively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one articles were included in the final synthesis: 17 randomized controlled trials, 3 cross sectional studies, and 1 experimental study. Studies were mostly moderate-quality clinical trials (n = 17) on manual therapy (n = 14) for low back pain (n = 10) that measured prevention by assessing healthcare use (n = 14) or symptom recurrence (n = 11). Heterogeneity of methods, low numbers, and mixed quality did not allow for conclusions about the effectiveness of COP interventions in preventing MSK complaints.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The evidence base is heterogeneous and of moderate quality making clinical recommendations challenging, but future research priorities have been identified, including a need for further research into primary, but mostly in secondary and tertiary prevention in COP; future research in COP should be designed in line with best practices and existing guidelines; and a need for the development and validation of reliable tools to stratify risks and management options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100725"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174606892400018X/pdfft?md5=7d3843d569f7c2d7389a57ee7905dc86&pid=1-s2.0-S174606892400018X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141048544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic pain, complexity and a suggested role for the osteopathic profession 慢性疼痛、复杂性和建议骨科专业发挥的作用
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100724
Hannah Naomi McDonald , Toby Joseph Lowe

Chronic pain is common and has a substantial impact on individuals’ lives and the society in which they live. However, current strategies for managing chronic pain have low to moderate efficacy. We present a complexity informed model of managing chronic pain.

The authors propose that the biological, psychological and social factors influencing the experience of chronic pain can be framed as elements of a complex system (when ‘system’ is understood as a mental model of a set of relationships in the world) and discuss the advantages of this approach.

The ‘Learning Cycles’ framework of Human Learning Systems is suggested as an appropriate approach to managing chronic pain. There are five elements of the Learning Cycle; ‘understanding the system’, ‘co-design’, ‘experimentation exploration’, ‘embedding and influencing’ and ‘system stewardship’. The authors describe how this could be implemented in osteopathic practice.

The implications of a complexity approach with respect to evidence-informed as opposed to evidence-based practice is briefly discussed. Further, the opportunity for osteopathy to be at the vanguard of broader movement for change in public service and healthcare is highlighted.

Applying Learning Cycles to the context of managing chronic pain requires further research to explore its utility. Learning Cycles provide an action-research model that would supply the rich data by which to understand the efficacy of chronic pain management.

Implications for practice

  • Using a complexity informed approach (Human Learning Systems' Learning Cycles) in the management of chronic pain.

  • Structured and efficient way of providing a co-produced, person specific approach to practice.

  • Practical way of incorporating biological, psychological and social factors influencing the person's experience of chronic pain into management, without assuming causal weighting.

  • Epistemological implications for research and the current understanding of hierarchy of evidence.

慢性疼痛是一种常见病,对个人生活和所在社会有很大影响。然而,目前管理慢性疼痛的策略效果一般。作者提出,影响慢性疼痛体验的生物、心理和社会因素可被视为一个复杂系统的要素(当 "系统 "被理解为世界上一系列关系的心理模型时),并讨论了这种方法的优势。学习周期有五个要素:"了解系统"、"共同设计"、"实验探索"、"嵌入和影响 "以及 "系统管理"。作者描述了如何在整骨疗法实践中实施这一方法,并简要讨论了复杂性方法对循证实践的影响。此外,作者还强调了整骨疗法在更广泛的公共服务和医疗保健变革运动中充当先锋的机会。将 "学习循环 "应用于慢性疼痛管理需要进一步的研究,以探索其实用性。学习循环提供了一个行动研究模型,可为了解慢性疼痛管理的有效性提供丰富的数据。对实践的启示--在慢性疼痛管理中使用复杂性方法(人类学习系统的学习循环)--以结构化和高效的方式提供共同生产的、针对个人的实践方法--将影响慢性疼痛患者体验的生物、心理和社会因素纳入管理的实用方法,而不假定因果权重--对研究和当前证据等级理解的认识论影响。
{"title":"Chronic pain, complexity and a suggested role for the osteopathic profession","authors":"Hannah Naomi McDonald ,&nbsp;Toby Joseph Lowe","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100724","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100724","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chronic pain is common and has a substantial impact on individuals’ lives and the society in which they live. However, current strategies for managing chronic pain have low to moderate efficacy. We present a complexity informed model of managing chronic pain.</p><p>The authors propose that the biological, psychological and social factors influencing the experience of chronic pain can be framed as elements of a complex system (when ‘system’ is understood as a mental model of a set of relationships in the world) and discuss the advantages of this approach.</p><p>The ‘Learning Cycles’ framework of Human Learning Systems is suggested as an appropriate approach to managing chronic pain. There are five elements of the Learning Cycle; ‘understanding the system’, ‘co-design’, ‘experimentation exploration’, ‘embedding and influencing’ and ‘system stewardship’. The authors describe how this could be implemented in osteopathic practice.</p><p>The implications of a complexity approach with respect to evidence-informed as opposed to evidence-based practice is briefly discussed. Further, the opportunity for osteopathy to be at the vanguard of broader movement for change in public service and healthcare is highlighted.</p><p>Applying Learning Cycles to the context of managing chronic pain requires further research to explore its utility. Learning Cycles provide an action-research model that would supply the rich data by which to understand the efficacy of chronic pain management.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Using a complexity informed approach (Human Learning Systems' Learning Cycles) in the management of chronic pain.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Structured and efficient way of providing a co-produced, person specific approach to practice.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Practical way of incorporating biological, psychological and social factors influencing the person's experience of chronic pain into management, without assuming causal weighting.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Epistemological implications for research and the current understanding of hierarchy of evidence.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141190469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and adaptation of the Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) for the Australian osteopathic profession - A cognitive interview study 为澳大利亚整骨疗法专业开发和改编整骨疗法治疗方法问卷(Osteo-TAQ)--认知访谈研究
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100723
Oliver P. Thomson , Gopi Anne McLeod , Michael Fleischmann , Brett Vaughan

Background

The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel 36-item instrument developed from qualitative grounded theory research with osteopaths in the United Kingdom. The Osteo-TAQ has the potential to measure multiple domains of osteopaths' practice including their therapeutic approach, clinical decision-making and therapeutic relationship with patients. It is unknown how well the items in the Osteo-TAQ relate to the practice of Australian osteopaths.

Objectives

To assess and improve the quality of the Osteo-TAQ survey items prior to utilising the Osteo-TAQ amongst the Australian osteopathic profession.

Methods

Cognitive interviews with six Australian registered osteopaths (n = 6) were used to generate data on how participants interpreted and understood the Osteo-TAQ items. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and content analysis was used to identify issues of comprehension and problem areas relating to the Osteo-TAQ.

Results

Three areas for improvement were identified in relation to the core aspects of clinical practice (the patient, examination, treatment and management), use of possessive pronouns and Likert scale frequency response options.

Conclusion

These problems may reflect the similarities in osteopathic practice in the UK and Australia, but also indicate subtle differences in the terminology utilised by osteopaths to describe and communicate areas of their clinical practice.

背景骨科医师治疗方法问卷(Osteo-TAQ)是根据对英国骨科医师进行的定性基础理论研究开发的 36 个项目的新工具。Osteo-TAQ 有可能测量骨科医生实践的多个领域,包括他们的治疗方法、临床决策以及与患者的治疗关系。在澳大利亚整骨疗法专业中使用 Osteo-TAQ 之前,对 Osteo-TAQ 调查项目的质量进行评估和改进。方法对六名澳大利亚注册整骨疗法医师(n = 6)进行认知访谈,以获得有关参与者如何解释和理解 Osteo-TAQ 项目的数据。结果在临床实践的核心方面(患者、检查、治疗和管理)、物主代词的使用和李克特量表频率响应选项方面发现了三个需要改进的领域。结论这些问题可能反映了英国和澳大利亚骨科实践的相似性,但也表明骨科医生在描述和交流临床实践领域时所使用的术语存在细微差别。
{"title":"Development and adaptation of the Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) for the Australian osteopathic profession - A cognitive interview study","authors":"Oliver P. Thomson ,&nbsp;Gopi Anne McLeod ,&nbsp;Michael Fleischmann ,&nbsp;Brett Vaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100723","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100723","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel 36-item instrument developed from qualitative grounded theory research with osteopaths in the United Kingdom. The Osteo-TAQ has the potential to measure multiple domains of osteopaths' practice including their therapeutic approach, clinical decision-making and therapeutic relationship with patients. It is unknown how well the items in the Osteo-TAQ relate to the practice of Australian osteopaths.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess and improve the quality of the Osteo-TAQ survey items prior to utilising the Osteo-TAQ amongst the Australian osteopathic profession.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cognitive interviews with six Australian registered osteopaths (n = 6) were used to generate data on how participants interpreted and understood the Osteo-TAQ items. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and content analysis was used to identify issues of comprehension and problem areas relating to the Osteo-TAQ.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three areas for improvement were identified in relation to the core aspects of clinical practice (the patient, examination, treatment and management), use of possessive pronouns and Likert scale frequency response options.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These problems may reflect the similarities in osteopathic practice in the UK and Australia, but also indicate subtle differences in the terminology utilised by osteopaths to describe and communicate areas of their clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140788269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of ankle mobilization on postural control in older people: A systematic review with meta-analysis 踝关节活动对老年人姿势控制的效果:系统回顾与荟萃分析
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100722
David Hernández-Guillén , Carmen García-Gomariz , Sergio Roig-Casasús , Beatriz Díaz-Díaz , Fernando Domínguez-Navarro , José Pérez-Maletzki , José-María Blasco

Objective

To determine whether manual therapy based on joint mobilization techniques applied to recover a limited range of motion (ROM) in older adults could have a beneficial effect on balance.

Methods

Systematic review from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PEDro, WOS, Scopus, and Scielo, including studies with participants over 60, an experimental intervention based on ankle joint mobilization techniques, oriented to restore ankle ROM and assessing the effects on balance and ROM. A descriptive synthesis and a meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the effect of the interventions on balance and ROM, based on mean differences, with CI set at 95 %. Quality was assessed with PEDro scale and risk of bias with the Cochrane tool.

Results

A total of 8 studies were included in the qualitative and 5 in the quantitative synthesis. Manual therapy was shown to be effective, by overall increasing the ankle ROM by 11.3° (95 % CI 6.4 to 15.6). The monopodal stability was improved in 5.8 s (95 % CI 0.1 to 11.4) and the margins of stability in 4.4 cm (95 % CI 0.6 to 8.6). The static balance improved in terms of the center of pressure swayed area with a decrease of 78.4 mm2 (95 % CI 46.1 to 110.6), but not of velocity (95 % CI 24.7 to −36.7). The Timed up and go time decreased by 0.86 s (95 % CI 0.38 to −2.08).

Conclusions

Manual therapy based on joint mobilization techniques is an effective approach to increase ankle ROM, with benefits on the stability of older adults.

方法对 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、PEDro、WOS、Scopus 和 Scielo 的研究进行系统综述,其中包括 60 岁以上参与者的研究、基于踝关节活动技术的实验性干预、旨在恢复踝关节活动度的研究以及评估对平衡和活动度影响的研究。我们进行了描述性综合分析和荟萃分析,根据平均差异估算干预措施对平衡和ROM的影响,CI设定为95%。研究质量采用 PEDro 量表进行评估,偏倚风险采用 Cochrane 工具进行评估。结果表明,手法治疗是有效的,踝关节活动度总体增加了 11.3°(95 % CI 6.4 至 15.6)。单足稳定性提高了 5.8 秒(95 % CI 0.1 至 11.4),稳定性边缘提高了 4.4 厘米(95 % CI 0.6 至 8.6)。静态平衡的压力中心摇摆面积减少了 78.4 平方毫米(95 % CI 46.1 至 110.6),但速度没有减少(95 % CI 24.7 至 -36.7)。结论以关节活动技术为基础的手动疗法是增加踝关节活动度的有效方法,对老年人的稳定性有好处。
{"title":"Efficacy of ankle mobilization on postural control in older people: A systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"David Hernández-Guillén ,&nbsp;Carmen García-Gomariz ,&nbsp;Sergio Roig-Casasús ,&nbsp;Beatriz Díaz-Díaz ,&nbsp;Fernando Domínguez-Navarro ,&nbsp;José Pérez-Maletzki ,&nbsp;José-María Blasco","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100722","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100722","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether manual therapy based on joint mobilization techniques applied to recover a limited range of motion (ROM) in older adults could have a beneficial effect on balance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic review from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PEDro, WOS, Scopus, and Scielo, including studies with participants over 60, an experimental intervention based on ankle joint mobilization techniques, oriented to restore ankle ROM and assessing the effects on balance and ROM. A descriptive synthesis and a meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the effect of the interventions on balance and ROM, based on mean differences, with CI set at 95 %. Quality was assessed with PEDro scale and risk of bias with the Cochrane tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 8 studies were included in the qualitative and 5 in the quantitative synthesis. Manual therapy was shown to be effective, by overall increasing the ankle ROM by 11.3° (95 % CI 6.4 to 15.6). The monopodal stability was improved in 5.8 s (95 % CI 0.1 to 11.4) and the margins of stability in 4.4 cm (95 % CI 0.6 to 8.6). The static balance improved in terms of the center of pressure swayed area with a decrease of 78.4 mm<sup>2</sup> (95 % CI 46.1 to 110.6), but not of velocity (95 % CI 24.7 to −36.7). The Timed up and go time decreased by 0.86 s (95 % CI 0.38 to −2.08).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Manual therapy based on joint mobilization techniques is an effective approach to increase ankle ROM, with benefits on the stability of older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 100722"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000154/pdfft?md5=e4fd0a2f0169237a3275ba8d995f6d60&pid=1-s2.0-S1746068924000154-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140772359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A national cross-sectional survey of the attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice amongst Canadian osteopaths 加拿大骨科医生对循证实践的态度、技能和使用情况的全国横断面调查
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100721
René Pelletier , Chantal Morin , Monica Noy , Oliver P. Thomson , Tobias Sundberg , Matthew J. Leach

Background

Health care professions face increasing pressure to integrate research evidence into practice to improve patient outcomes. For many professions, the uptake of evidence-based practice (EBP) remains poorly understood, including for osteopaths in Canada. The primary aim of this study was to determine the perceptions, training, self perceived skills, use, barriers, and facilitators of EBP amongst Canadian osteopaths.

Methods

Canadian Osteopaths were invited to participate in an online survey using the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude and Utilisation Survey.

Results

Four hundred and eight osteopaths’ (response rate 13.4%) provided informed consent of which three hundred and forty answered all questions. The majority of respondents had a favorable perception and believed EBP was important (70.8%). Most respondents (>65%) rated their skills in performing EBP at a medium-high level. EBP use was infrequent among respondents. Barriers to the utilisation of EBP were lack of clinical evidence, time, and relevance to osteopathic practice. Facilitators of EBP use included having greater access to research articles and tools, and further information regarding critical analysis of research. Although searching and consulting research information was rarely performed by respondents, they were perceived as the most important aspect of clinical decision making along with clinical practice guidelines, personal and patient preferences.

Conclusion

Canadian osteopathic manual practitioners were largely supportive of EBP but there was limited commitment to its integration within clinical practice. Improving knowledge and skills of EBP, addressing the barriers of EBP uptake, and integrating EBP into educational programs may improve the uptake of EBP within osteopathic practice.

Implications for practice

There is acknowledgement of the importance and benefits of evidence-based practice amongst Canadian osteopaths.

Although Canadian osteopaths recognize the importance of evidence-based practice there is limited commitment to its use within clinical practice.

The major barriers to the use of evidence-based practice are a lack of time and clinically relevant osteopathic literature.

Canadian osteopaths state that patient preference, clinical practice guidelines, published clinical evidence and personal preference where the most important sources of information used for the basis of clinical decision making.

Interventions that aim to improve knowledge and skills, addresses barriers, and fosters alignment between osteopathic models and evidence-based practices may help to improve the uptake among osteopaths in Canada.

医疗保健行业面临着越来越大的压力,需要将研究证据融入实践,以改善患者的治疗效果。对于许多专业而言,人们对循证实践(EBP)的采用情况仍然知之甚少,加拿大的骨科医生也不例外。本研究的主要目的是确定加拿大骨科医生对循证实践的认知、培训、自我认知技能、使用、障碍和促进因素。加拿大骨科医生应邀参加了使用循证实践态度和使用情况调查的在线调查。四百零八名骨科医生(回复率为 13.4%)提供了知情同意书,其中三百四十名骨科医生回答了所有问题。大多数受访者对循证医学实践持肯定态度,认为其非常重要(70.8%)。大多数受访者(超过 65%)将其执行 EBP 的技能评为中高级水平。受访者很少使用 EBP。使用 EBP 的障碍是缺乏临床证据、时间以及与骨科实践的相关性。使用 EBP 的促进因素包括有更多机会获取研究文章和工具,以及有关批判性分析研究的更多信息。虽然受访者很少搜索和查阅研究信息,但他们认为这与临床实践指南、个人和患者偏好一样,是临床决策的最重要方面。加拿大整骨疗法徒手从业者基本上都支持 EBP,但将其纳入临床实践的承诺却很有限。提高EBP的知识和技能,解决EBP应用的障碍,并将EBP纳入教育计划,可以提高EBP在整骨疗法实践中的应用。
{"title":"A national cross-sectional survey of the attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice amongst Canadian osteopaths","authors":"René Pelletier ,&nbsp;Chantal Morin ,&nbsp;Monica Noy ,&nbsp;Oliver P. Thomson ,&nbsp;Tobias Sundberg ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Leach","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100721","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100721","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health care professions face increasing pressure to integrate research evidence into practice to improve patient outcomes. For many professions, the uptake of evidence-based practice (EBP) remains poorly understood, including for osteopaths in Canada. The primary aim of this study was to determine the perceptions, training, self perceived skills, use, barriers, and facilitators of EBP amongst Canadian osteopaths.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Canadian Osteopaths were invited to participate in an online survey using the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude and Utilisation Survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four hundred and eight osteopaths’ (response rate 13.4%) provided informed consent of which three hundred and forty answered all questions. The majority of respondents had a favorable perception and believed EBP was important (70.8%). Most respondents (&gt;65%) rated their skills in performing EBP at a medium-high level. EBP use was infrequent among respondents. Barriers to the utilisation of EBP were lack of clinical evidence, time, and relevance to osteopathic practice. Facilitators of EBP use included having greater access to research articles and tools, and further information regarding critical analysis of research. Although searching and consulting research information was rarely performed by respondents, they were perceived as the most important aspect of clinical decision making along with clinical practice guidelines, personal and patient preferences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Canadian osteopathic manual practitioners were largely supportive of EBP but there was limited commitment to its integration within clinical practice. Improving knowledge and skills of EBP, addressing the barriers of EBP uptake, and integrating EBP into educational programs may improve the uptake of EBP within osteopathic practice.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>There is acknowledgement of the importance and benefits of evidence-based practice amongst Canadian osteopaths.</p><p>Although Canadian osteopaths recognize the importance of evidence-based practice there is limited commitment to its use within clinical practice.</p><p>The major barriers to the use of evidence-based practice are a lack of time and clinically relevant osteopathic literature.</p><p>Canadian osteopaths state that patient preference, clinical practice guidelines, published clinical evidence and personal preference where the most important sources of information used for the basis of clinical decision making.</p><p>Interventions that aim to improve knowledge and skills, addresses barriers, and fosters alignment between osteopathic models and evidence-based practices may help to improve the uptake among osteopaths in Canada.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140149724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence of anchoring bias in novice (first year) osteopathic French students in the context of the primary respiratory mechanism: A randomized-experimental study 初级呼吸机制背景下骨科法国新手(一年级)学生锚定偏差的证据:随机实验研究
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100717
Clara Driaï-Allègre , Fanny Coste , Clara Olmière , Marilyne Grinand , Aymeric Le Nohaïc , François Romanet , Géraud Gourjon

Background

Cognitive biases appear to be one of the most common causes of incorrect medical diagnosis. It affects students during their training and could persist after post-graduation. This could deteriorate patient care. Among them, anchoring bias can impair haptic perception and lead to a biased diagnosis.

Objective

Our study assessed the anchoring bias of first-year osteopathic students by determining whether information regarding the PRM rhythm could influence their haptic perception.

Methods

Forty first-year osteopathic students were randomly assigned to three groups. They were given different anchoring values during a PRM rhythm evaluation (3, 10 or 17 movements per minute, mpm). All information were given through video documents. Perceived rhythms were collected before and after anchoring. Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare intra and intergroup values.

Results

Before receiving the anchor, groups significantly (p = 0.105) perceived the same rhythms (11.8 ± 6.6mpm; 20.9 ± 9.9mpm; 18.2 ± 10.6mpm; respectively) with high variance among students. After receiving the anchor, students perceived significantly different rhythms; 3.5 ± 1.7mpm; 11.4 ± 2.8mpm; 16.8 ± 6.6mpm, respectively (p < 0.0001). Variance decreased significantly.

Conclusion

An anchoring bias might occur among first-year osteopathic students regarding their perception of the PRM rhythm. These results provide insights into the importance of the way of presenting information to students, especially controversial ones. Indeed, the way in which changing the ontological framework can modify the epistemological approach needs to be investigated. This could have implications on a student's clinical diagnosis. Students are encouraged to believe in their haptic ability, but also to use critical thinking.

背景认知偏差似乎是造成错误医疗诊断的最常见原因之一。学生在接受培训期间会受到影响,毕业后也可能持续存在。这可能会恶化对病人的护理。我们的研究评估了骨科一年级学生的锚定偏差,确定有关 PRM 节律的信息是否会影响他们的触觉感知。在进行 PRM 节奏评估时,给他们提供不同的锚定值(每分钟 3、10 或 17 个动作,mpm)。所有信息均通过视频文件提供。在锚定前后收集感知节奏。Wilcoxon 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验用于比较组内和组间的数值。结果在接受锚定前,各组对节奏的感知明显相同(p = 0.105)(分别为 11.8 ± 6.6mpm;20.9 ± 9.9mpm;18.2 ± 10.6mpm;),但学生之间的差异很大。接受锚后,学生感知到的节奏明显不同:分别为 3.5 ± 1.7mpm;11.4 ± 2.8mpm;16.8 ± 6.6mpm(p < 0.0001)。结论 一年级骨科学生对 PRM 节奏的感知可能存在锚定偏差。这些结果让我们了解到向学生展示信息(尤其是有争议的信息)的方式的重要性。事实上,改变本体论框架可以改变认识论方法,这一点需要研究。这可能会对学生的临床诊断产生影响。鼓励学生相信自己的触觉能力,同时也要运用批判性思维。
{"title":"Evidence of anchoring bias in novice (first year) osteopathic French students in the context of the primary respiratory mechanism: A randomized-experimental study","authors":"Clara Driaï-Allègre ,&nbsp;Fanny Coste ,&nbsp;Clara Olmière ,&nbsp;Marilyne Grinand ,&nbsp;Aymeric Le Nohaïc ,&nbsp;François Romanet ,&nbsp;Géraud Gourjon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100717","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100717","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cognitive biases appear to be one of the most common causes of incorrect medical diagnosis. It affects students during their training and could persist after post-graduation. This could deteriorate patient care. Among them, anchoring bias can impair haptic perception and lead to a biased diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our study assessed the anchoring bias of first-year osteopathic students by determining whether information regarding the PRM rhythm could influence their haptic perception.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty first-year osteopathic students were randomly assigned to three groups. They were given different anchoring values during a PRM rhythm evaluation (3, 10 or 17 movements per minute, mpm). All information were given through video documents. Perceived rhythms were collected before and after anchoring. Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare intra and intergroup values.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Before receiving the anchor, groups significantly (p = 0.105) perceived the same rhythms (11.8 ± 6.6mpm; 20.9 ± 9.9mpm; 18.2 ± 10.6mpm; respectively) with high variance among students. After receiving the anchor, students perceived significantly different rhythms; 3.5 ± 1.7mpm; 11.4 ± 2.8mpm; 16.8 ± 6.6mpm, respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). Variance decreased significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An anchoring bias might occur among first-year osteopathic students regarding their perception of the PRM rhythm. These results provide insights into the importance of the way of presenting information to students, especially controversial ones. Indeed, the way in which changing the ontological framework can modify the epistemological approach needs to be investigated. This could have implications on a student's clinical diagnosis. Students are encouraged to believe in their haptic ability, but also to use critical thinking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100717"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139951369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pseudoscience: A skeleton in osteopathy's closet? 伪科学--骨病学壁橱里的骨架?
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100716
Oliver P. Thomson , Carlo Martini

Pseudoscience has harmful effects on individual patient care, professions and society more broadly. The propagation of pseudoscience and spread of misinformation by a healthcare discipline raises questions as to their legitimacy and ethical standing as a profession. Osteopaths and osteopathic physicians are regulated by law as healthcare professionals in many parts of the world with an expectation that relevant aspects of practice are suitably aligned with the scientific paradigm in the form of a commitment to the values of evidence-based practice. This article discusses the system of pseudoscience and considers its historic, present and potential negative impacts on osteopathy and professional progress. We identify possible incentives for some aspects of osteopathy and osteopaths to engage in pseudoscientific thinking and in doing so we discuss osteopathy's susceptibility to pseudoscience and how practitioners may become more aware of and recognise pseudoscientific information and pseudoexpertise.

伪科学对病人护理、专业和社会都有有害影响。医疗保健学科使用伪科学和传播错误信息,会让人质疑其作为专业的合法性和道德地位。在世界许多地方,骨科医师和骨科医生作为医疗保健专业人员受到法律监管,并被要求在执业的相关方面与科学范式保持适当的一致,即承诺以证据为基础的执业价值观。本文讨论了伪科学体系,并探讨了其对骨病学和专业进步的历史、现状和潜在负面影响。我们确定了骨病学和骨科医生在某些方面参与伪科学思考的可能诱因,并在此过程中讨论了骨病学对伪科学的易感性,以及从业人员如何才能更好地认识和识别伪科学信息和伪专家。
{"title":"Pseudoscience: A skeleton in osteopathy's closet?","authors":"Oliver P. Thomson ,&nbsp;Carlo Martini","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100716","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100716","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pseudoscience has harmful effects on individual patient care, professions and society more broadly. The propagation of pseudoscience and spread of misinformation by a healthcare discipline raises questions as to their legitimacy and ethical standing as a profession. Osteopaths and osteopathic physicians are regulated by law as healthcare professionals in many parts of the world with an expectation that relevant aspects of practice are suitably aligned with the scientific paradigm in the form of a commitment to the values of evidence-based practice. This article discusses the system of pseudoscience and considers its historic, present and potential negative impacts on osteopathy and professional progress. We identify possible incentives for some aspects of osteopathy and osteopaths to engage in pseudoscientific thinking and in doing so we discuss osteopathy's susceptibility to pseudoscience and how practitioners may become more aware of and recognise pseudoscientific information and pseudoexpertise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139922192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1