Pub Date : 2026-01-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.016
Matthew G King, Nicole Alousis, Thomas Collins, Emily C Bell, Andrew Hahne, Prasadi Wadanambi Arachchige, Jordan Stewart, Katharine See, Elisha O'Dowd, Adam I Semciw
Introduction: Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite most cases being nonurgent and best managed in primary care, low back pain remains a common reason for emergency department presentations. Given the potential differences in recovery and management needs in this setting, digital care pathways offer a scalable tool for remote monitoring and targeted research. This study aimed to explore symptom trajectories of people with low back pain presenting to the emergency department over 12 weeks using a digital care pathway.
Methods: Eligible participants were adults presenting to the emergency department with neuromusculoskeletal low back pain who were not admitted for ward care. Participants completed patient-reported outcomes on pain (numerical pain rating scale), quality of life (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level), function (Oswestry disability index), and psychological state at 3 time points over 12 weeks, with recovery trajectories analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.
Results: A total of 111 people with low back pain registered for the digital care pathway over 6 months. Improvements from baseline to 6 weeks were observed for pain (mean difference, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.1-3.9; P<.001), quality of life (-0.1; -0.2 to 0.0; P = .005), and function (13.6; 7.3-19.9; P<.001), with no improvement between 6 and 12 weeks. Psychological state, inclusive of depression, anxiety, and stress, did not change over the 12-week period.
Discussion: Although people with low back pain in the emergency department show a similar recovery trajectory to those in general practice, they present with higher levels of pain and disability throughout recovery. Given high levels of pain and disability, minimalist care may be inadequate in this setting, highlighting the need for ED-specific low back pain guidelines.
{"title":"Symptom Trajectories of People With Low Back Pain Presenting to the Emergency Department: Insights From the BACK TrAC Digital Care Pathway.","authors":"Matthew G King, Nicole Alousis, Thomas Collins, Emily C Bell, Andrew Hahne, Prasadi Wadanambi Arachchige, Jordan Stewart, Katharine See, Elisha O'Dowd, Adam I Semciw","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite most cases being nonurgent and best managed in primary care, low back pain remains a common reason for emergency department presentations. Given the potential differences in recovery and management needs in this setting, digital care pathways offer a scalable tool for remote monitoring and targeted research. This study aimed to explore symptom trajectories of people with low back pain presenting to the emergency department over 12 weeks using a digital care pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were adults presenting to the emergency department with neuromusculoskeletal low back pain who were not admitted for ward care. Participants completed patient-reported outcomes on pain (numerical pain rating scale), quality of life (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level), function (Oswestry disability index), and psychological state at 3 time points over 12 weeks, with recovery trajectories analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 people with low back pain registered for the digital care pathway over 6 months. Improvements from baseline to 6 weeks were observed for pain (mean difference, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.1-3.9; P<.001), quality of life (-0.1; -0.2 to 0.0; P = .005), and function (13.6; 7.3-19.9; P<.001), with no improvement between 6 and 12 weeks. Psychological state, inclusive of depression, anxiety, and stress, did not change over the 12-week period.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although people with low back pain in the emergency department show a similar recovery trajectory to those in general practice, they present with higher levels of pain and disability throughout recovery. Given high levels of pain and disability, minimalist care may be inadequate in this setting, highlighting the need for ED-specific low back pain guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.014
Arielle Goff, Jody L Bauer, Sidarrth Prasad, Brianna O'Quinns, DaiWai M Olson, Roberta Novakovic
Introduction: Stroke coordinators spend much of their time in the emergency department; many of them are nurses working dual roles as current emergency nurses or trauma coordinators and stroke coordinators. How this hybrid role affects burnout is unknown. This study assessed the impact of this gap on stroke program managers and coordinators through the Texas Stroke Program Survey.
Methods: An electronic survey, with the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory--Human Services Survey instrument to evaluate work-related burnout, was distributed to 181 Texas-designated stroke facilities. They were asked to have 1 stroke coordinator or manager complete the survey anonymously.
Results: Of the 105 approached, 103 responded, and 78 completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, of whom 83.5% (86 of 103) worked at primary or comprehensive stroke centers. Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey results showed that 74.4% of the population (58 of 78) exhibited burnout profiles, which were characterized by feelings of ineffectiveness, overextension, or burnout. Turnover among stroke coordinators was high, with 49.5% (51 of 103) reporting 2 or more turnovers over 5 years.
Discussion: The survey results highlight significant variability in role definition and responsibilities among stroke coordinators. Nearly 91.3% of respondents (94 of 103) emphasized the need for standardizing program requirements and providing adequate support for staff development. Implementing a program like those used in trauma centers may reduce variability, enhance support, and mitigate burnout.
{"title":"Texas Stroke Program Assessment: Infrastructure, Turnover, and Burnout Implications.","authors":"Arielle Goff, Jody L Bauer, Sidarrth Prasad, Brianna O'Quinns, DaiWai M Olson, Roberta Novakovic","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke coordinators spend much of their time in the emergency department; many of them are nurses working dual roles as current emergency nurses or trauma coordinators and stroke coordinators. How this hybrid role affects burnout is unknown. This study assessed the impact of this gap on stroke program managers and coordinators through the Texas Stroke Program Survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey, with the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory--Human Services Survey instrument to evaluate work-related burnout, was distributed to 181 Texas-designated stroke facilities. They were asked to have 1 stroke coordinator or manager complete the survey anonymously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 105 approached, 103 responded, and 78 completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, of whom 83.5% (86 of 103) worked at primary or comprehensive stroke centers. Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey results showed that 74.4% of the population (58 of 78) exhibited burnout profiles, which were characterized by feelings of ineffectiveness, overextension, or burnout. Turnover among stroke coordinators was high, with 49.5% (51 of 103) reporting 2 or more turnovers over 5 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The survey results highlight significant variability in role definition and responsibilities among stroke coordinators. Nearly 91.3% of respondents (94 of 103) emphasized the need for standardizing program requirements and providing adequate support for staff development. Implementing a program like those used in trauma centers may reduce variability, enhance support, and mitigate burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.10.026
Alexandria Carey, Angela Starkweather, Hwayoung Cho, Jason M Beneciuk, Qinglin Pei, Ang Li, Laurie Duckworth, Ann Horgas
Introduction: Emergency nurses often struggle to deliver effective discharge education owing to limited tools that support patient self-management behaviors. These behaviors, particularly confidence in managing pain (self-efficacy), are essential for managing acute low back pain and reducing pain severity and interference. This pilot study aimed to develop and evaluate a digital self-management intervention, guided by the individual and family self-management theory, to improve patient-centered outcomes.
Methods: Conducted over 7 months in 3 emergency departments, adult patients were randomized into 2 groups: (1) standard discharge care or (2) standard care plus the intervention (an educational video and virtual booster sessions at week 2 and week 8). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using established criteria for pilot studies. Preliminary clinical efficacy (defined as early evidence of clinically meaningful benefits for patients) was evaluated using measures of patient activation, self-efficacy, and pain severity and interference, collected at 1, 6, and 12 weeks after discharge.
Results: Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were met, with 86% recruitment (n = 30), 80% retention, adherence, study satisfaction, 87% video satisfaction, and 100% engagement and study recommendation. Participants most frequently recalled the actor's demonstrations, which were reinforced during boosters. The intervention group showed consistent improvements across all measures, with minimal clinically important differences in self-efficacy and pain interference at every time point.
Discussion: This study demonstrates that the digital intervention is both feasible and acceptable, with promising early evidence of meaningful clinical benefit. These findings support the need for a larger trial to fully evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.
{"title":"Evaluating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Clinical Efficacy of a Digital Self-Management Intervention in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Alexandria Carey, Angela Starkweather, Hwayoung Cho, Jason M Beneciuk, Qinglin Pei, Ang Li, Laurie Duckworth, Ann Horgas","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.10.026","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.10.026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency nurses often struggle to deliver effective discharge education owing to limited tools that support patient self-management behaviors. These behaviors, particularly confidence in managing pain (self-efficacy), are essential for managing acute low back pain and reducing pain severity and interference. This pilot study aimed to develop and evaluate a digital self-management intervention, guided by the individual and family self-management theory, to improve patient-centered outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted over 7 months in 3 emergency departments, adult patients were randomized into 2 groups: (1) standard discharge care or (2) standard care plus the intervention (an educational video and virtual booster sessions at week 2 and week 8). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using established criteria for pilot studies. Preliminary clinical efficacy (defined as early evidence of clinically meaningful benefits for patients) was evaluated using measures of patient activation, self-efficacy, and pain severity and interference, collected at 1, 6, and 12 weeks after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were met, with 86% recruitment (n = 30), 80% retention, adherence, study satisfaction, 87% video satisfaction, and 100% engagement and study recommendation. Participants most frequently recalled the actor's demonstrations, which were reinforced during boosters. The intervention group showed consistent improvements across all measures, with minimal clinically important differences in self-efficacy and pain interference at every time point.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the digital intervention is both feasible and acceptable, with promising early evidence of meaningful clinical benefit. These findings support the need for a larger trial to fully evaluate its impact on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.10.017
Sophie Lightfoot, Hannah Kia, Elijah Foran, Wendy Gifford, Patrick O'Byrne, Amanda Vandyk
Introduction: This exploratory study aimed to provide preliminary insights into how trans and gender diverse youth rate their care in emergency departments, which factors they perceive as influencing their experiences, and whether the concept of ED avoidance, identified in research with trans and gender diverse adults, is relevant to trans and gender diverse youth.
Methods: This exploratory cross-sectional survey and online questionnaire was codesigned by a research team that comprised academic members and trans and gender diverse youth. The study was open to youth across Canada and collected both sociodemographic information and experiential data using short-answer and Likert-type scales paired with comment boxes.
Results: The participants (n = 28), aged 16 to 25 years, reported highly variable experiences in the emergency department, ranging from 0 (very poor) to 8.5 of 10 (excellent) with a mean of 4.3. Furthermore, half (n = 14; 50%) avoided seeking needed care out of concern for how they would be treated. The results of this study suggest that there are a number of factors, such as the trans-competence of the provider, the patient's co-occurring positionality, and the type of chief complaint, that may contribute to the poor experiences of trans and gender diverse youth and their subsequent ED avoidance.
Discussion: These findings provide preliminary insights into the experiences of trans and gender diverse youth accessing and receiving care in emergency departments and suggest that ED avoidance is a salient concept for this age/developmental stage.
{"title":"Experiences of Trans and Gender Diverse Youth Accessing Emergency Departments: Results of a Community-Designed Questionnaire.","authors":"Sophie Lightfoot, Hannah Kia, Elijah Foran, Wendy Gifford, Patrick O'Byrne, Amanda Vandyk","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.10.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.10.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This exploratory study aimed to provide preliminary insights into how trans and gender diverse youth rate their care in emergency departments, which factors they perceive as influencing their experiences, and whether the concept of ED avoidance, identified in research with trans and gender diverse adults, is relevant to trans and gender diverse youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory cross-sectional survey and online questionnaire was codesigned by a research team that comprised academic members and trans and gender diverse youth. The study was open to youth across Canada and collected both sociodemographic information and experiential data using short-answer and Likert-type scales paired with comment boxes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (n = 28), aged 16 to 25 years, reported highly variable experiences in the emergency department, ranging from 0 (very poor) to 8.5 of 10 (excellent) with a mean of 4.3. Furthermore, half (n = 14; 50%) avoided seeking needed care out of concern for how they would be treated. The results of this study suggest that there are a number of factors, such as the trans-competence of the provider, the patient's co-occurring positionality, and the type of chief complaint, that may contribute to the poor experiences of trans and gender diverse youth and their subsequent ED avoidance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide preliminary insights into the experiences of trans and gender diverse youth accessing and receiving care in emergency departments and suggest that ED avoidance is a salient concept for this age/developmental stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.002
Marzieh Khatooni, Maryam Momeni, Ahad Alizadeh, Mir Maysam Khalilzade
Introduction: Identifying the factors influencing emergency nurses' adherence to ethical codes is a crucial strategy for enhancing compliance with these standards. This study aimed to examine the determinants affecting emergency nurses' adherence to ethical codes.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 291 nurses working in emergency departments in Iran. Data were collected using the nurses' professional autonomy questionnaire, the perceived organizational support questionnaire, and the adherence to ethical codes questionnaire. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee at the school of nursing. Privacy and confidentiality of the data were ensured, and an informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection.
Results: The mean scores for adherence to ethical codes, professional autonomy, and perceived organizational support were 53.45 ± 5.62 (above moderate levels), 115.99 ± 10.17 (above moderate levels), and 7.78 ± 5.31 (at weak levels), respectively. Professional autonomy (P<.001) demonstrated a significant positive impact on adherence to ethical codes but perceived organizational supports' predictive role was borderline (P = .06). In addition, the variables of sex (female) (P<.05) and previous experience in ethics workshops (P<.002) had a significant positive effect on adherence to ethical codes.
Discussion: Professional autonomy, sex, and experience in ethics workshops were identified as positive predictors of emergency nurses' adherence to ethical codes. These findings can serve as a guide for nursing managers and policy makers in creating an environment conducive to the implementation of ethical principles in clinical practice. In particular, they highlight the importance of empowerment programs and support strategies aimed at enhancing nurses' professional autonomy and decision making, particularly in emergency department settings.
{"title":"Professional Autonomy and Perceived Organizational Support as Predictors of Adherence to Ethical Codes Among Emergency Nurses.","authors":"Marzieh Khatooni, Maryam Momeni, Ahad Alizadeh, Mir Maysam Khalilzade","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying the factors influencing emergency nurses' adherence to ethical codes is a crucial strategy for enhancing compliance with these standards. This study aimed to examine the determinants affecting emergency nurses' adherence to ethical codes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 291 nurses working in emergency departments in Iran. Data were collected using the nurses' professional autonomy questionnaire, the perceived organizational support questionnaire, and the adherence to ethical codes questionnaire. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee at the school of nursing. Privacy and confidentiality of the data were ensured, and an informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores for adherence to ethical codes, professional autonomy, and perceived organizational support were 53.45 ± 5.62 (above moderate levels), 115.99 ± 10.17 (above moderate levels), and 7.78 ± 5.31 (at weak levels), respectively. Professional autonomy (P<.001) demonstrated a significant positive impact on adherence to ethical codes but perceived organizational supports' predictive role was borderline (P = .06). In addition, the variables of sex (female) (P<.05) and previous experience in ethics workshops (P<.002) had a significant positive effect on adherence to ethical codes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Professional autonomy, sex, and experience in ethics workshops were identified as positive predictors of emergency nurses' adherence to ethical codes. These findings can serve as a guide for nursing managers and policy makers in creating an environment conducive to the implementation of ethical principles in clinical practice. In particular, they highlight the importance of empowerment programs and support strategies aimed at enhancing nurses' professional autonomy and decision making, particularly in emergency department settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.009
K Jane Muir, Daniela Golinelli, Karen B Lasater, Linda H Aiken, Raina Merchant, Matthew D McHugh, J Margo Brooks Carthon
Introduction: A patient departure against medical advice is an adverse event driven by patient care dissatisfaction and is associated with higher odds of hospital readmissions and death. Given evidence that better hospital nursing resources are associated with improved patient satisfaction, we evaluated whether nurse staffing ratios are associated with rates of emergency department patient departures against medical advice.
Methods: Cross-sectional design using data from 3 sources: 2023 Penn Nurses4All survey, the 2023 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department Database of patient emergency department visits in New Jersey and Oregon, and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Patient-to-nurse staffing ratios were measured among direct care nurses in emergency departments and medical-surgical units. Logistic regression models were constructed with nurses and patients clustered within hospitals, with adjusted models accounting for patient and hospital characteristics.
Results: The sample included 2,211,244 emergency department patient visits in 74 hospitals. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, each additional patient added to an emergency department and a medical-surgical nurse's workload was associated with 19% and 55% higher odds of an against medical advice departure, respectively (emergency department, adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09-1.31; P < .001; medical-surgical, adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.33-1.81; P < .001).
Discussion: Increases in nurses' workloads, both in the emergency department and inpatient setting, were associated with more emergency department patients leaving against medical advice. When nurses care for more patients at a time, patients are attended to less frequently, which can result in more self-directed patient departures. Insufficient staffing in medical-surgical units contributes to longer length of stay and lower inpatient bed turnover. Hospital investments in safer staffing may reduce against medical advice departures.
{"title":"Association of Emergency Department and Medical-Surgical Nurse Staffing on Patient Departures Against Medical Advice.","authors":"K Jane Muir, Daniela Golinelli, Karen B Lasater, Linda H Aiken, Raina Merchant, Matthew D McHugh, J Margo Brooks Carthon","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A patient departure against medical advice is an adverse event driven by patient care dissatisfaction and is associated with higher odds of hospital readmissions and death. Given evidence that better hospital nursing resources are associated with improved patient satisfaction, we evaluated whether nurse staffing ratios are associated with rates of emergency department patient departures against medical advice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional design using data from 3 sources: 2023 Penn Nurses4All survey, the 2023 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department Database of patient emergency department visits in New Jersey and Oregon, and the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Patient-to-nurse staffing ratios were measured among direct care nurses in emergency departments and medical-surgical units. Logistic regression models were constructed with nurses and patients clustered within hospitals, with adjusted models accounting for patient and hospital characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 2,211,244 emergency department patient visits in 74 hospitals. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, each additional patient added to an emergency department and a medical-surgical nurse's workload was associated with 19% and 55% higher odds of an against medical advice departure, respectively (emergency department, adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09-1.31; P < .001; medical-surgical, adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.33-1.81; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Increases in nurses' workloads, both in the emergency department and inpatient setting, were associated with more emergency department patients leaving against medical advice. When nurses care for more patients at a time, patients are attended to less frequently, which can result in more self-directed patient departures. Insufficient staffing in medical-surgical units contributes to longer length of stay and lower inpatient bed turnover. Hospital investments in safer staffing may reduce against medical advice departures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.11.021
Sümeyye Akçoban
Introduction: Nurses working in emergency departments are frequently exposed to fatigue and impaired sleep quality. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of progressive muscle relaxation exercises on fatigue severity and sleep quality among nurses working in the emergency department.
Methods: This self-controlled quasi-experimental study was conducted with 35 nurses employed in the emergency department of a public hospital in Turkey. Data were collected using the "Nurse Demographic Information Form," the "Fatigue Severity Scale," and the "Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index." The study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist for reporting.
Results: After the progressive muscle relaxation exercise intervention, the nurses showed significantly lower fatigue severity scores, indicating a meaningful difference and effect (P < .001; partial eta squared = 0.208). Similarly, after the intervention, sleep quality scores were also significantly improved, showing a statistically significant difference and effect (P < .001; partial eta squared = 0.271).
Discussion: This study demonstrates that progressive muscle relaxation exercises are an effective method for reducing fatigue severity and improving sleep quality among emergency nurses.
{"title":"The Effect of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercises on Fatigue Severity and Sleep Quality Among Emergency Nurses: A Self-Controlled Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Sümeyye Akçoban","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.11.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.11.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses working in emergency departments are frequently exposed to fatigue and impaired sleep quality. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of progressive muscle relaxation exercises on fatigue severity and sleep quality among nurses working in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This self-controlled quasi-experimental study was conducted with 35 nurses employed in the emergency department of a public hospital in Turkey. Data were collected using the \"Nurse Demographic Information Form,\" the \"Fatigue Severity Scale,\" and the \"Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.\" The study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist for reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the progressive muscle relaxation exercise intervention, the nurses showed significantly lower fatigue severity scores, indicating a meaningful difference and effect (P < .001; partial eta squared = 0.208). Similarly, after the intervention, sleep quality scores were also significantly improved, showing a statistically significant difference and effect (P < .001; partial eta squared = 0.271).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates that progressive muscle relaxation exercises are an effective method for reducing fatigue severity and improving sleep quality among emergency nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146013285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.09.011
Katherine Remick, Ashley A Foster, Aaron R Jensen, Regan F Williams, Elizabeth Stone, Madeline Joseph, Gregory Conners, Kathleen Brown, Marianne Gausche-Hill
This is a revision of the previous joint policy statement titled "Pediatric Readiness in the Emergency Department." This is a joint policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American College of Surgeons, and the Emergency Nurses Association. These updated recommendations are intended to serve as a resource for clinical and administrative leadership of emergency departments as they strive to improve their readiness for the emergency care of children of all ages.
{"title":"Pediatric Readiness in the Emergency Department: Policy Statement.","authors":"Katherine Remick, Ashley A Foster, Aaron R Jensen, Regan F Williams, Elizabeth Stone, Madeline Joseph, Gregory Conners, Kathleen Brown, Marianne Gausche-Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.09.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.09.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a revision of the previous joint policy statement titled \"Pediatric Readiness in the Emergency Department.\" This is a joint policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American College of Surgeons, and the Emergency Nurses Association. These updated recommendations are intended to serve as a resource for clinical and administrative leadership of emergency departments as they strive to improve their readiness for the emergency care of children of all ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146013288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.006
Nicolas Fürer, Evelyne Giacobbe, Eleni Ress
Introduction: Discrimination and stigmatization in emergency departments continue to threaten equitable and safe patient care, particularly for individuals with psychiatric disorders and other marginalized groups. This could include people who are homeless or who are discriminated against because of their sexuality or gender or for other reasons. Traditional education focused solely on knowledge transfer has proven insufficient to address these issues. Person-centered practice, grounded in values, beliefs, and authentic relationships, offers a promising framework to foster equity, inclusion, and reflection among health care professionals. This project explored how person-centered, active learning strategies, facilitated by clinical nurse specialists, can promote awareness of bias and discrimination within emergency care teams.
Methods: A practice development project titled "The Year of Education" was implemented in the emergency department of the University Hospital Basel in January 2024. Rooted in McCormack's person-centered practice framework, the initiative integrated active learning, reflection, and person-centered approaches across monthly educational themes. Two immersive learning interventions are described: (1) a self-experience simulation contrasting stigmatizing and inclusive handovers and (2) a reflective listening exercise using audio recordings of former psychiatric patients describing their experiences with coercive interventions. Each session was facilitated by clinical nurse specialists and followed by group discussions and qualitative evaluations using written reflections and team feedback.
Results: Participants showed increased self-awareness of stigmatizing behaviors. The learning interventions fostered empathy and critical reflection, prompting staff to reconsider routine practices such as the presence of too many people during psychiatric crises or giving handovers behind closed curtains. Staff expressed that these experiences deepened their understanding of patient perspectives and strengthened person-centered approaches in daily practice.
Discussion: The interventions demonstrated that person-centered, reflective education can meaningfully shift attitudes and communication patterns within emergency care. Although the project lacked a formal quantitative evaluation, its perceived impact led to its continuing as the emergency department's educational strategy. Embedding advanced practice nurse roles focused on health equity may be a further step toward less stigmatization and more equity in the emergency department.
{"title":"Person-Centered Strategies to Promote Health Equity and Tackle Stigmatization: The Role of the Clinical Nurse Specialist.","authors":"Nicolas Fürer, Evelyne Giacobbe, Eleni Ress","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrimination and stigmatization in emergency departments continue to threaten equitable and safe patient care, particularly for individuals with psychiatric disorders and other marginalized groups. This could include people who are homeless or who are discriminated against because of their sexuality or gender or for other reasons. Traditional education focused solely on knowledge transfer has proven insufficient to address these issues. Person-centered practice, grounded in values, beliefs, and authentic relationships, offers a promising framework to foster equity, inclusion, and reflection among health care professionals. This project explored how person-centered, active learning strategies, facilitated by clinical nurse specialists, can promote awareness of bias and discrimination within emergency care teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A practice development project titled \"The Year of Education\" was implemented in the emergency department of the University Hospital Basel in January 2024. Rooted in McCormack's person-centered practice framework, the initiative integrated active learning, reflection, and person-centered approaches across monthly educational themes. Two immersive learning interventions are described: (1) a self-experience simulation contrasting stigmatizing and inclusive handovers and (2) a reflective listening exercise using audio recordings of former psychiatric patients describing their experiences with coercive interventions. Each session was facilitated by clinical nurse specialists and followed by group discussions and qualitative evaluations using written reflections and team feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants showed increased self-awareness of stigmatizing behaviors. The learning interventions fostered empathy and critical reflection, prompting staff to reconsider routine practices such as the presence of too many people during psychiatric crises or giving handovers behind closed curtains. Staff expressed that these experiences deepened their understanding of patient perspectives and strengthened person-centered approaches in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The interventions demonstrated that person-centered, reflective education can meaningfully shift attitudes and communication patterns within emergency care. Although the project lacked a formal quantitative evaluation, its perceived impact led to its continuing as the emergency department's educational strategy. Embedding advanced practice nurse roles focused on health equity may be a further step toward less stigmatization and more equity in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.003
Jessica P Sherman, Nathaniel Albright, Brent Emerson, Chelsea Cobranchi, Jennifer L Brown, Ethan Morgan, Gordon L Gillespie, David Spatholt, Rebekah Richards, Brittany E Punches
Introduction: Housing instability increases chronic pain risk and creates care barriers, making emergency departments the primary points of health care for people experiencing housing instability. Although it is clear that housing instability contributes to chronic pain, the patient's experience of pain is less understood. This study examines differences in pain characteristics by housing status.
Methods: This secondary analysis used data from the Decision-Making Factors for Therapeutic Opioid Use after Emergency Care. In the original study, randomly selected eligible participants self-reported housing status, in addition to validated measures of pain interference, pain self-efficacy, pain anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances. Regression models explored the relationship between housing status and pain-related outcomes adjusting for demographics.
Results: Among participants (N = 496), 47 (9.5%) reported unstable housing. Compared with stably housed patients, those with unstable housing had higher adjusted odds of current (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.11-3.86) and lifetime chronic pain (adjusted odds ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.28-4.58) and higher pain-related anxiety scores (β = 13.43; 95% CI, 6.51-20.35), depressive symptoms (β = 4.62; 95% CI, 2.83-6.41), and sleep disturbance (β = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.07-3.54). No differences were found in pain self-efficacy (β = -0.78; 95% CI, -6.88 to 3.62).
Discussion: Unstably housed emergency department patients experience higher rates of chronic pain and pain-related anxiety while maintaining similar pain self-efficacy. Systems-level interventions that address social and structural barriers to pain management among unstably housed patients are needed to improve pain management and reduce emergency department burden. The results should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and large confidence intervals.
{"title":"No Place to Rest: Housing Instability and Pain Experiences in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Jessica P Sherman, Nathaniel Albright, Brent Emerson, Chelsea Cobranchi, Jennifer L Brown, Ethan Morgan, Gordon L Gillespie, David Spatholt, Rebekah Richards, Brittany E Punches","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Housing instability increases chronic pain risk and creates care barriers, making emergency departments the primary points of health care for people experiencing housing instability. Although it is clear that housing instability contributes to chronic pain, the patient's experience of pain is less understood. This study examines differences in pain characteristics by housing status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from the Decision-Making Factors for Therapeutic Opioid Use after Emergency Care. In the original study, randomly selected eligible participants self-reported housing status, in addition to validated measures of pain interference, pain self-efficacy, pain anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances. Regression models explored the relationship between housing status and pain-related outcomes adjusting for demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants (N = 496), 47 (9.5%) reported unstable housing. Compared with stably housed patients, those with unstable housing had higher adjusted odds of current (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.11-3.86) and lifetime chronic pain (adjusted odds ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.28-4.58) and higher pain-related anxiety scores (β = 13.43; 95% CI, 6.51-20.35), depressive symptoms (β = 4.62; 95% CI, 2.83-6.41), and sleep disturbance (β = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.07-3.54). No differences were found in pain self-efficacy (β = -0.78; 95% CI, -6.88 to 3.62).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Unstably housed emergency department patients experience higher rates of chronic pain and pain-related anxiety while maintaining similar pain self-efficacy. Systems-level interventions that address social and structural barriers to pain management among unstably housed patients are needed to improve pain management and reduce emergency department burden. The results should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and large confidence intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}