首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Emergency Nursing最新文献

英文 中文
Using a Behavior Assessment Tool to Decrease Restraint Use in the Emergency Department. 使用行为评估工具减少急诊室使用限制措施的情况。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.013
Andrew Slavetskas, Catherine Czerenda, Mark Medina

Introduction: Behavioral health visits to emergency departments have increased, increasing the risk of patient violent agitation that may require restraints to control. Our objective was to determine whether using the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale and treatment recommendations matched to patient scores would affect the number of patients who required physical restraints during their stay in the emergency department.

Methods: In this quality improvement project, nursing performed Behavioral Activity Rating Scale assessments on all behavioral health patients who presented to the emergency department, occurring during triage and at regular intervals with vital signs. Data were collected for a period before implementation and compared with data collected after implementing the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale workflow. Patients who required restraints during their stay, patients who required 2 or more restraints during their stay, and timing of restraint application were analyzed.

Results: Results show a decrease in the number of patients who required restraints during their ED stay, decreasing from a rate of 8.7% to 7.0% (P = .02). There was also a decrease in the number of patients who required multiple restraints, from a rate of 82.2% to 27.2% (P < .001). There was no difference in the number of patients who required restraints 1 hour after their arrival before versus after intervention (P = .40).

Discussion: Early recognition of patient agitation is essential in appropriate treatment of that agitation. The Behavioral Activity Rating Scale assessment is an effective tool to quantify a patient's agitation level. When coupled with treatment recommendations or protocols, it may decrease restraint use in the emergency department.

导言:到急诊科就诊的行为健康患者越来越多,这增加了患者暴力躁动的风险,可能需要使用束缚措施来控制。我们的目标是确定使用行为活动评分量表和与患者评分相匹配的治疗建议是否会影响急诊科住院期间需要使用束缚措施的患者人数:在这个质量改进项目中,护理人员对急诊科的所有行为健康患者进行了行为活动评分量表评估,评估在分诊过程中进行,并与生命体征一起定期进行。在实施前收集了一段时间的数据,并与实施行为活动分级量表工作流程后收集的数据进行了比较。对住院期间需要使用束缚措施的患者、住院期间需要使用 2 次或 2 次以上束缚措施的患者以及使用束缚措施的时间进行了分析:结果显示,在急诊室住院期间需要使用限制措施的患者人数有所减少,从 8.7% 降至 7.0%(P = .02)。需要使用多重束缚措施的患者人数也有所减少,从 82.2% 降至 27.2% (P < .001)。干预前后,到达医院 1 小时后需要使用束缚措施的患者人数没有差异(P = .40):讨论:及早识别病人的躁动对适当治疗躁动至关重要。行为活动量表评估是量化患者躁动程度的有效工具。如果与治疗建议或方案相结合,它可以减少急诊科使用束缚措施的情况。
{"title":"Using a Behavior Assessment Tool to Decrease Restraint Use in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Andrew Slavetskas, Catherine Czerenda, Mark Medina","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Behavioral health visits to emergency departments have increased, increasing the risk of patient violent agitation that may require restraints to control. Our objective was to determine whether using the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale and treatment recommendations matched to patient scores would affect the number of patients who required physical restraints during their stay in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quality improvement project, nursing performed Behavioral Activity Rating Scale assessments on all behavioral health patients who presented to the emergency department, occurring during triage and at regular intervals with vital signs. Data were collected for a period before implementation and compared with data collected after implementing the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale workflow. Patients who required restraints during their stay, patients who required 2 or more restraints during their stay, and timing of restraint application were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results show a decrease in the number of patients who required restraints during their ED stay, decreasing from a rate of 8.7% to 7.0% (P = .02). There was also a decrease in the number of patients who required multiple restraints, from a rate of 82.2% to 27.2% (P < .001). There was no difference in the number of patients who required restraints 1 hour after their arrival before versus after intervention (P = .40).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Early recognition of patient agitation is essential in appropriate treatment of that agitation. The Behavioral Activity Rating Scale assessment is an effective tool to quantify a patient's agitation level. When coupled with treatment recommendations or protocols, it may decrease restraint use in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142548828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Do Nurses Experience Relational Work in the Emergency Department-Qualitative Study. 急诊科护士如何体验关系工作--定性研究。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.006
Hejdi Gamst-Jensen, Marie Louise Thise Rasmussen, Hanne Konradsen, Ingrid Poulsen

Introduction: This study aimed to explore how nurses experience relational work in the emergency department.

Methods: A qualitative design with 34 focus group interviews using an abductive thematic analysis were completed for this study. Participants were recruited from an annual mandatory continuous learning program in 2020-2022 at 2 university hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. We applied semistructured interviews in an instructor-supported reflection session on the topic "relational nursing care." Group discussion was supported by an interview guide addressing key elements of the nurse-patient relationship as described in the fundamentals of care framework.

Results: Acute care nurses' attention was primarily directed toward the initial patient assessment, rather than toward the later stages of the patient trajectory. Forming a relationship with the patient was highly individual and done at the discretion of each nurse. The key elements of relational nursing were not mutually exclusive, but the findings could be separated into biomedical and relational care, where biomedical tasks took precedence.

Discussion: Relational care in the emergency department is optional and individually performed. Moreover, emergency nurses lack a vocabulary to express this type of work. Consequently, there is a risk that patients' psychosocial needs are not sufficiently met. According to the emergency nurses participating in this study, nurses fall short when performing and describing relational care. Nurses need more knowledge to address the psychosocial patient needs during short-term hospital admissions. Relational care and patient centeredness also need to be acknowledged by nursing leaders and further developed.

导言本研究旨在探讨急诊科护士如何体验关系工作:本研究采用定性设计,通过归纳主题分析法完成了 34 个焦点小组访谈。参与者来自丹麦首都地区两所大学医院的 2020-2022 年年度强制性继续学习项目。我们在教师支持的反思课程中就 "关系护理 "这一主题进行了半结构式访谈。小组讨论由访谈指南支持,访谈指南涉及护理基础框架中描述的护患关系的关键要素:结果:急症护理护士的注意力主要集中在对病人的初步评估上,而不是病人病程的后期阶段。与病人建立关系是非常个性化的,由每位护士自行决定。关系护理的关键要素并不相互排斥,但研究结果可分为生物医学护理和关系护理,其中生物医学护理任务优先:讨论:急诊科的亲情护理是可选的,也是单独进行的。此外,急诊科护士缺乏表达这类工作的词汇。因此,病人的社会心理需求有可能得不到充分满足。参与本研究的急诊护士认为,护士在开展和描述亲情护理时存在不足。护士需要更多的知识来满足短期住院患者的社会心理需求。亲情护理和以患者为中心也需要得到护理领导的认可和进一步发展。
{"title":"How Do Nurses Experience Relational Work in the Emergency Department-Qualitative Study.","authors":"Hejdi Gamst-Jensen, Marie Louise Thise Rasmussen, Hanne Konradsen, Ingrid Poulsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to explore how nurses experience relational work in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design with 34 focus group interviews using an abductive thematic analysis were completed for this study. Participants were recruited from an annual mandatory continuous learning program in 2020-2022 at 2 university hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. We applied semistructured interviews in an instructor-supported reflection session on the topic \"relational nursing care.\" Group discussion was supported by an interview guide addressing key elements of the nurse-patient relationship as described in the fundamentals of care framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acute care nurses' attention was primarily directed toward the initial patient assessment, rather than toward the later stages of the patient trajectory. Forming a relationship with the patient was highly individual and done at the discretion of each nurse. The key elements of relational nursing were not mutually exclusive, but the findings could be separated into biomedical and relational care, where biomedical tasks took precedence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Relational care in the emergency department is optional and individually performed. Moreover, emergency nurses lack a vocabulary to express this type of work. Consequently, there is a risk that patients' psychosocial needs are not sufficiently met. According to the emergency nurses participating in this study, nurses fall short when performing and describing relational care. Nurses need more knowledge to address the psychosocial patient needs during short-term hospital admissions. Relational care and patient centeredness also need to be acknowledged by nursing leaders and further developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142114471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency Nursing Review Questions: January 2025. 急诊护理评论问题:2025年1月。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.015
Benjamin E Marett, Sherri-Lynne Almeida
{"title":"Emergency Nursing Review Questions: January 2025.","authors":"Benjamin E Marett, Sherri-Lynne Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 1","pages":"158-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ENA Clinical Practice Guideline Synopsis: Aggression Assessment. ENA临床实践指南简介:攻击性评估。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.007
Janet Kaiser, Diana DeGroot, Amy Tucker, Andrea Slivinski, Alison Camarda, Sharon Coffey, Carolyn Dixon, Joshua Gibson, Robin MacPherson-Dias, Andrea Perry, Andrew Slifko, Sheryln Wachtel, Jessica Bishop-Royse, Altair M Delao
{"title":"ENA Clinical Practice Guideline Synopsis: Aggression Assessment.","authors":"Janet Kaiser, Diana DeGroot, Amy Tucker, Andrea Slivinski, Alison Camarda, Sharon Coffey, Carolyn Dixon, Joshua Gibson, Robin MacPherson-Dias, Andrea Perry, Andrew Slifko, Sheryln Wachtel, Jessica Bishop-Royse, Altair M Delao","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 1","pages":"36-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paradoxical Motion of the Chest Wall. 胸壁的矛盾运动。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.009
Chun-Jen Wu, Chen-Yu Lai, Yi-Ling Ting, Chih-Jung Chang
{"title":"Paradoxical Motion of the Chest Wall.","authors":"Chun-Jen Wu, Chen-Yu Lai, Yi-Ling Ting, Chih-Jung Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 1","pages":"27-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishing Triage Competencies and Verification Processes: A Survey Study. 建立分流能力和验证流程:调查研究。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.005
Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Claire Simon, Francine M Jodelka

Introduction: Although the ED triage function is a critical means of ensuring patient safety, core competencies for ED triage are not well defined in the literature. The purpose of the study was to identify and validate emergency triage nursing competencies and to develop a competency verification process.

Methods: A sample of 1181 emergency nurses evenly divided between roles with oversight of triage training and competency assessment (manager-level and staff nurses performing triage) completed an online survey evaluating competency elements that comprised the following in terms of frequency and importance, training modalities, and evaluation methods: expert assessment, clinical judgment, management of medical resources, communication, and timely decisions.

Results: Both manager-level and triage nurses agreed on the importance of the identified competencies. Gaps in training and evaluation were reported by both staff nurses and manager-level nurses. Triage nurses reported less training offered and less competency evaluation compared with manager-level nurses. Triage nurses reported performing all competencies more frequently and at higher level of competency than manager-level nurses reporting on triage nurse performance.

Discussion: This study provides both a standard set of triage competencies and a method by which to evaluate them. Managers and educators might consider this standard to establish initial triage role competency and periodic competency assessment per institutional guidelines. The gap in perceived education and evaluation suggests that standard education and evaluation processes be adopted across emergency departments.

导言:尽管急诊室分诊功能是确保患者安全的重要手段,但文献中并未对急诊室分诊的核心能力做出明确定义。本研究旨在确定和验证急诊分诊护理能力,并制定能力验证流程:方法:1181 名急诊护士完成了一项在线调查,对能力要素进行评估,这些能力要素包括以下方面的频率和重要性、培训模式和评估方法:专家评估、临床判断、医疗资源管理、沟通和及时决策:结果:主管级护士和分诊护士都认同所确定能力的重要性。员工级护士和管理级护士都报告了培训和评估方面的差距。与经理级护士相比,分诊护士的培训和能力评估较少。与经理级护士相比,分诊护士在报告分诊护士表现时更频繁地报告了所有能力,能力水平也更高:本研究提供了一套标准的分诊能力和评估方法。管理者和教育者可以考虑采用这一标准来建立分诊角色的初始能力,并根据机构指南定期进行能力评估。教育和评估方面的差距表明,急诊科应采用标准的教育和评估流程。
{"title":"Establishing Triage Competencies and Verification Processes: A Survey Study.","authors":"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Claire Simon, Francine M Jodelka","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.09.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the ED triage function is a critical means of ensuring patient safety, core competencies for ED triage are not well defined in the literature. The purpose of the study was to identify and validate emergency triage nursing competencies and to develop a competency verification process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 1181 emergency nurses evenly divided between roles with oversight of triage training and competency assessment (manager-level and staff nurses performing triage) completed an online survey evaluating competency elements that comprised the following in terms of frequency and importance, training modalities, and evaluation methods: expert assessment, clinical judgment, management of medical resources, communication, and timely decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both manager-level and triage nurses agreed on the importance of the identified competencies. Gaps in training and evaluation were reported by both staff nurses and manager-level nurses. Triage nurses reported less training offered and less competency evaluation compared with manager-level nurses. Triage nurses reported performing all competencies more frequently and at higher level of competency than manager-level nurses reporting on triage nurse performance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides both a standard set of triage competencies and a method by which to evaluate them. Managers and educators might consider this standard to establish initial triage role competency and periodic competency assessment per institutional guidelines. The gap in perceived education and evaluation suggests that standard education and evaluation processes be adopted across emergency departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"59-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological Distress and the Needs of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients in Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. COVID-19 大流行期间急诊科重症患者家属的心理压力和需求:一项横断面研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.005
Li-Rong Wu, Jun-Yu Fan, Tse-Hsuan Su, Chin-Yen Han

Introduction: The literature highlights the importance of the needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments. Understanding these needs helps to alleviate psychological distress and contribute to the patients' recoveries. This study aimed to examine the psychological distress and needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to collect data using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21, the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory for the Emergency Department, and the Needs Met Inventory questionnaire from a convenience sample of 170 family members of critical patients. Descriptive analysis and importance-performance analysis were applied to analyze the data.

Results: The results showed that 52.4% of family members reported mild to extremely severe levels of depression, 60% reported mild to extremely severe levels of anxiety, and 53.5% had mild to extremely severe levels of stress. Anxiety showed a significant negative correlation with comfort needs (r = -0.17) and support needs being met (r = -0.16). The importance-performance analysis showed that the coordinates for support needs were in quadrant IV, signifying a higher level of importance perceived by family members but a lower level of the needs being met.

Conclusion: Providing the assessment and necessary support to alleviate psychological distress will help enhance the ability of the emergency department to meet families' needs.

导言:文献强调了急诊科危重病人家属需求的重要性。了解这些需求有助于减轻患者的心理压力,促进患者康复。本研究旨在探讨急诊科危重病人家属的心理困扰和需求:方法:采用横断面设计,使用抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21、急诊科危重病人家属需求量表和需求满足量表问卷收集数据,样本为 170 名危重病人家属。数据分析采用了描述性分析和重要性表现分析:结果显示,52.4%的家属有轻度到极重度抑郁,60%的家属有轻度到极重度焦虑,53.5%的家属有轻度到极重度压力。焦虑与舒适需求(r = -0.17)和支持需求得到满足(r = -0.16)呈显著负相关。重要性-绩效分析表明,支持需求的坐标位于第四象限,表明家庭成员认为其重要性较高,但需求得到满足的程度较低:结论:提供评估和必要的支持以缓解心理压力,将有助于提高急诊科满足家属需求的能力。
{"title":"Psychological Distress and the Needs of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients in Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Li-Rong Wu, Jun-Yu Fan, Tse-Hsuan Su, Chin-Yen Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The literature highlights the importance of the needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments. Understanding these needs helps to alleviate psychological distress and contribute to the patients' recoveries. This study aimed to examine the psychological distress and needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used to collect data using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21, the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory for the Emergency Department, and the Needs Met Inventory questionnaire from a convenience sample of 170 family members of critical patients. Descriptive analysis and importance-performance analysis were applied to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 52.4% of family members reported mild to extremely severe levels of depression, 60% reported mild to extremely severe levels of anxiety, and 53.5% had mild to extremely severe levels of stress. Anxiety showed a significant negative correlation with comfort needs (r = -0.17) and support needs being met (r = -0.16). The importance-performance analysis showed that the coordinates for support needs were in quadrant IV, signifying a higher level of importance perceived by family members but a lower level of the needs being met.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providing the assessment and necessary support to alleviate psychological distress will help enhance the ability of the emergency department to meet families' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141996888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methanol Poisoning: A Growing Concern in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. 甲醇中毒:COVID-19大流行时代日益关注的问题。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.001
{"title":"Methanol Poisoning: A Growing Concern in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addressing Bias in the Care of Geriatric Emergency Department Patients. 解决老年急诊科患者护理中的偏见。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.018
Altair M Delao
{"title":"Addressing Bias in the Care of Geriatric Emergency Department Patients.","authors":"Altair M Delao","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 1","pages":"3-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reaching Out to Our Fellow Emergency Nurses. 向急救护士同行伸出援手。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.013
Ryan Oglesby
{"title":"Reaching Out to Our Fellow Emergency Nurses.","authors":"Ryan Oglesby","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142973169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Emergency Nursing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1