Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-06-17DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00094
Li-Hong Wang, Tong-Bo Deng, Ting-Ting Jin
Objective: To analyze the risk factors that affect the survival of patients undergoing vertebroplasty and construct a predictive nomogram.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of the survival status for patients age ≥50 years who underwent vertebroplasty in our hospital from January 2013 to August 2022. Demographic information, inpatient data, laboratory examination results, medication records, and other information were extracted from the clinical scientific research database of our hospital. Through proportional hazards assumption, univariate and subsequent multivariate COX regression, the independent risk factors that affect the survival prognosis of patients after vertebroplasty were summarized. A survival prediction nomogram based on these independent risk factors were constructed and validated.
Results: Three hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled, 251 in the training set and 108 in the validation set. Multivariate COX regression showed that mean serum albumin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59565, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36160 to 0.9812), number of vertebroplasty (HR = 0.1978, 95% CI, 0.06529 to 0.2197), interval between the first two vertebroplasty procedures (HR = 0.05642, 95% CI, 0.02933 to 0.1085), and number of activating vitamin D prescriptions (HR = 0.34975, 95% CI, 0.19855 to 0.6161) were independent risk factors for the survival prognosis of patients after vertebroplasty. Based on these independent risk factors, a predictive nomogram was constructed. The area under the curve of the 5- and 8-year survival prediction models in the validation set was 0.889 and 0.760, respectively. The calibration curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets were close to the ideal diagonal. The decision curve analysis showed that the predictive model exhibited good net benefit and predictive ability.
Conclusion: Mean serum albumin, number of vertebroplasty, interval between the first two vertebroplasty procedures, and number of activating vitamin D prescriptions were independent risk factors for the survival prognosis of patients after vertebroplasty. The predictive nomogram constructed based on these risk factors had a good predictive ability and certain potential for clinical decision making.
{"title":"Construction and Validation of a Survival Prediction Model for Patients After Vertebroplasty.","authors":"Li-Hong Wang, Tong-Bo Deng, Ting-Ting Jin","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00094","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the risk factors that affect the survival of patients undergoing vertebroplasty and construct a predictive nomogram.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of the survival status for patients age ≥50 years who underwent vertebroplasty in our hospital from January 2013 to August 2022. Demographic information, inpatient data, laboratory examination results, medication records, and other information were extracted from the clinical scientific research database of our hospital. Through proportional hazards assumption, univariate and subsequent multivariate COX regression, the independent risk factors that affect the survival prognosis of patients after vertebroplasty were summarized. A survival prediction nomogram based on these independent risk factors were constructed and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled, 251 in the training set and 108 in the validation set. Multivariate COX regression showed that mean serum albumin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59565, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36160 to 0.9812), number of vertebroplasty (HR = 0.1978, 95% CI, 0.06529 to 0.2197), interval between the first two vertebroplasty procedures (HR = 0.05642, 95% CI, 0.02933 to 0.1085), and number of activating vitamin D prescriptions (HR = 0.34975, 95% CI, 0.19855 to 0.6161) were independent risk factors for the survival prognosis of patients after vertebroplasty. Based on these independent risk factors, a predictive nomogram was constructed. The area under the curve of the 5- and 8-year survival prediction models in the validation set was 0.889 and 0.760, respectively. The calibration curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets were close to the ideal diagonal. The decision curve analysis showed that the predictive model exhibited good net benefit and predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mean serum albumin, number of vertebroplasty, interval between the first two vertebroplasty procedures, and number of activating vitamin D prescriptions were independent risk factors for the survival prognosis of patients after vertebroplasty. The predictive nomogram constructed based on these risk factors had a good predictive ability and certain potential for clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e414-e423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144477817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-25DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00252
Margaret Jane Roubaud, Archana Babu, Bryan S Moon, Valerae O Lewis
Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) are two novel microsurgical techniques that can improve prosthetic control and prevent and treat chronic limb pain following amputation. Both techniques use nerve transfer to reroute the neural input from a transected nerve to new muscle targets, thereby preventing neuroma formation and creating a new functional pathway between peripheral nerves and the brain. These techniques were originally developed to improve myoelectronic bioprosthetic control, but both TMR and RPNI have expanded in their indications to the prevention and treatment of symptomatic neuromas, thus improving quality of life and decreasing the narcotic burden in this vulnerable population. This review describes the principles of TMR and RPNI, their indications, the perioperative technique, and the postoperative management of patients undergoing these procedures.
{"title":"Targeted Muscle Reinnervation and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface: The Evolving Landscape in the Treatment of Postamputation Pain and Prosthetics.","authors":"Margaret Jane Roubaud, Archana Babu, Bryan S Moon, Valerae O Lewis","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) are two novel microsurgical techniques that can improve prosthetic control and prevent and treat chronic limb pain following amputation. Both techniques use nerve transfer to reroute the neural input from a transected nerve to new muscle targets, thereby preventing neuroma formation and creating a new functional pathway between peripheral nerves and the brain. These techniques were originally developed to improve myoelectronic bioprosthetic control, but both TMR and RPNI have expanded in their indications to the prevention and treatment of symptomatic neuromas, thus improving quality of life and decreasing the narcotic burden in this vulnerable population. This review describes the principles of TMR and RPNI, their indications, the perioperative technique, and the postoperative management of patients undergoing these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"34 3","pages":"e324-e334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00853
Ben Kelley, Dane J Brodke, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Sai K Devana, Erik Mayer, Brendan Shi, Bailey Mooney, Akash Shah, Christopher Lee
Objectives: The optimal treatment of acetabulum fractures in elderly patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to review outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or acute total hip arthroplasty (aTHA) and to determine the age threshold based on treatment using a cost-effectiveness decision model.
Methods: The PubMed database was queried for clinical English language studies from 2002 to 2022 (N > 10), of acetabular fracture patients age >50 years treated with either ORIF or aTHA. Revision surgery and mortality rates were collected. Costs were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database. Health state utilities were converted to quality-adjusted life years, and a Markov decision analysis model was constructed. Sensitivity analyses were done with regard to the quality of life and cost variables.
Results: Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, including 16 ORIF studies (N = 909) and 18 aTHA studies (N = 403). The ORIF cohort had a mean age of 71 years, follow-up of 3.5 years, mortality rate of 11.7%, and a conversion arthroplasty rate of 19.6%. The aTHA cohort had a mean age of 73 years, follow-up of 3.2 years, mortality rate of 10.7%, and a revision rate of 4.5%. Our model demonstrated that ORIF was a more cost-effective treatment for patients aged 67 years or younger and that aTHA was more cost-effective for patients aged 68 years and older. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that this result was robust to small deviations in the cost of ORIF and aTHA but highly sensitive to functional outcome variables in the model.
Conclusion: A review of 30 studies demonstrated a conversion arthroplasty rate of 19.6% for patients older than 60 years compared with a revision rate of 4.5% for patients treated with aTHA. Without considering fracture pattern or patient factors, we found that aTHA is a more cost-effective treatment than ORIF for treatment of acetabulum fractures in patients aged 68 years and older.
{"title":"Fixation Versus Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acetabular Fracture: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.","authors":"Ben Kelley, Dane J Brodke, Alexander Upfill-Brown, Sai K Devana, Erik Mayer, Brendan Shi, Bailey Mooney, Akash Shah, Christopher Lee","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00853","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00853","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The optimal treatment of acetabulum fractures in elderly patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to review outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or acute total hip arthroplasty (aTHA) and to determine the age threshold based on treatment using a cost-effectiveness decision model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed database was queried for clinical English language studies from 2002 to 2022 (N > 10), of acetabular fracture patients age >50 years treated with either ORIF or aTHA. Revision surgery and mortality rates were collected. Costs were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample database. Health state utilities were converted to quality-adjusted life years, and a Markov decision analysis model was constructed. Sensitivity analyses were done with regard to the quality of life and cost variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, including 16 ORIF studies (N = 909) and 18 aTHA studies (N = 403). The ORIF cohort had a mean age of 71 years, follow-up of 3.5 years, mortality rate of 11.7%, and a conversion arthroplasty rate of 19.6%. The aTHA cohort had a mean age of 73 years, follow-up of 3.2 years, mortality rate of 10.7%, and a revision rate of 4.5%. Our model demonstrated that ORIF was a more cost-effective treatment for patients aged 67 years or younger and that aTHA was more cost-effective for patients aged 68 years and older. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that this result was robust to small deviations in the cost of ORIF and aTHA but highly sensitive to functional outcome variables in the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A review of 30 studies demonstrated a conversion arthroplasty rate of 19.6% for patients older than 60 years compared with a revision rate of 4.5% for patients treated with aTHA. Without considering fracture pattern or patient factors, we found that aTHA is a more cost-effective treatment than ORIF for treatment of acetabulum fractures in patients aged 68 years and older.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Economic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e457-e467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144805188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-06-24DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01509
Aiyush Bansal, Philip Louie, Murad Alostaz, Rakesh Kumar, Venu Nemani, Evan Yip, James Joko, John Michael, Mark Qiao, Jean-Christophe Leveque
Background: Understanding the role of risk-taking personality and tolerance for treatment-related complications in patients with spine pathology may help tailor surgical recommendations. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model that integrates standard clinical metrics with psychosocial factors, specifically examining whether patients with higher risk-taking tendencies are more likely to choose high-risk, high-reward surgeries.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study recruited 1,214 participants from the United States in January 2024 using an online crowdsourcing platform. Participants completed an 84-question survey covering demographics, disability levels, and risk-taking tendencies. They were presented with hypothetical spinal surgery scenarios featuring varying risks of complications (footdrop, paralysis, or death) and chances of improvement. Participants rated their likelihood of choosing surgery on a six-point Likert scale. Predictors included demographics, socioeconomic factors, risk-taking personality (measured by the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking survey), and baseline pain levels (measured by the Oswestry Disability Index). The XGBoost model was used for predictive analysis.
Results: The final sample included 797 (386 male, 411 female) participants. The predictive model achieved an R-squared of 0.75, root mean squared error of 0.81, and mean absolute error of 0.61. Key predictors of the likelihood to opt for surgery included lower complication risk and higher improvement probability, followed by younger age, higher body mass index, and lower scores in Domain-Specific Risk-Taking survey's financial and recreational domains.
Conclusion: Incorporating psychosocial dimensions into predictive models enhances the personalization of surgical risk discussions. This approach ensures that treatment recommendations align with patient values and risk perceptions, enabling more patient-centered care in spine surgery.
Level of evidence: Level 3 (cross-sectional study).
{"title":"Predictive Analytics in Spine Surgery: How Risk-Taking Behavior Shapes Surgical Decisions.","authors":"Aiyush Bansal, Philip Louie, Murad Alostaz, Rakesh Kumar, Venu Nemani, Evan Yip, James Joko, John Michael, Mark Qiao, Jean-Christophe Leveque","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01509","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01509","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the role of risk-taking personality and tolerance for treatment-related complications in patients with spine pathology may help tailor surgical recommendations. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model that integrates standard clinical metrics with psychosocial factors, specifically examining whether patients with higher risk-taking tendencies are more likely to choose high-risk, high-reward surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study recruited 1,214 participants from the United States in January 2024 using an online crowdsourcing platform. Participants completed an 84-question survey covering demographics, disability levels, and risk-taking tendencies. They were presented with hypothetical spinal surgery scenarios featuring varying risks of complications (footdrop, paralysis, or death) and chances of improvement. Participants rated their likelihood of choosing surgery on a six-point Likert scale. Predictors included demographics, socioeconomic factors, risk-taking personality (measured by the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking survey), and baseline pain levels (measured by the Oswestry Disability Index). The XGBoost model was used for predictive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 797 (386 male, 411 female) participants. The predictive model achieved an R-squared of 0.75, root mean squared error of 0.81, and mean absolute error of 0.61. Key predictors of the likelihood to opt for surgery included lower complication risk and higher improvement probability, followed by younger age, higher body mass index, and lower scores in Domain-Specific Risk-Taking survey's financial and recreational domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating psychosocial dimensions into predictive models enhances the personalization of surgical risk discussions. This approach ensures that treatment recommendations align with patient values and risk perceptions, enabling more patient-centered care in spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3 (cross-sectional study).</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e424-e436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144545943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01334
Simbarashe J Peresuh, Paul-Hugo Arcand, Joseph Confessore, Arianne Parvaresh-Rizi, Edward J Testa, Matthew Quinn, Gabriella Avellino, Michel A Arcand, Alan H Daniels
Background: The relationship between testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and hip fractures remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate this relationship. We hypothesize that patients prescribed TRT experience a lower rate of hip fractures compared with a control group.
Methods: The PearlDiver Mariner165 data set was used to obtain two random cohorts of 500,000 patients. The experimental group received TRT for at least 3 months and the control group did not. We used one-to-one matching to evaluate the effects of TRT in 301,724 patients. The incidence of hip fractures was assessed over a 2-year follow-up using the International Classifications of Disease codes. Multivariable logistic regression identified the association between TRT and hip fractures. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results: The patients in the TRT group were associated with a lower incidence of hip fractures compared with the control group (0.13% vs. 0.25%, P < 0.001). The multivariable analysis showed that TRT use was associated with a decreased incidence of hip fractures with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.66, P < 0.001). After stratifying by sex, the multivariable analysis showed that TRT use in male patients was associated with a decreased incidence of hip fractures with an aOR of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.72, P < 0.001); in female patients, it was associated with a decreased incidence of hip fractures with an aOR of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.63, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Patients prescribed TRT had a 1.9 times lower likelihood of sustaining hip fractures. Further investigation into the association of TRT and fragility fractures garners continued interest. In addition, this can provide insight into the potential benefits of TRT use and maintaining bone health to improve bone mass and improve results of orthopaedic interventions.
Level of evidence: III.
背景:睾酮替代疗法(TRT)与髋部骨折之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨这种关系。我们假设,与对照组相比,服用TRT的患者髋部骨折的发生率较低。方法:采用PearlDiver Mariner165数据集获得两个随机队列,共500,000例患者。实验组接受TRT治疗至少3个月,对照组不接受TRT治疗。我们在301,724例患者中使用一对一匹配来评估TRT的效果。髋骨骨折的发生率在2年的随访中使用国际疾病分类代码进行评估。多变量logistic回归确定了TRT与髋部骨折之间的关联。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:与对照组相比,TRT组患者髋部骨折发生率较低(0.13%比0.25%,P < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,TRT使用与髋部骨折发生率降低相关,校正优势比(aOR)为0.58(95%可信区间[CI], 0.51 ~ 0.66, P < 0.001)。按性别分层后,多变量分析显示,男性患者使用TRT与髋部骨折发生率降低相关,aOR为0.61 (95% CI, 0.53 ~ 0.72, P < 0.001);在女性患者中,它与髋部骨折发生率降低相关,aOR为0.49 (95% CI, 0.38 ~ 0.63, P < 0.001)。结论:接受TRT治疗的患者发生髋部骨折的可能性降低1.9倍。对TRT和脆性骨折之间关系的进一步研究引起了人们的持续关注。此外,这可以深入了解使用TRT和维持骨骼健康以改善骨量和改善骨科干预结果的潜在益处。证据水平:III。
{"title":"A Matched Retrospective Analysis: The Relationship Between Testosterone Replacement Therapy and the Incidence of Hip Fractures.","authors":"Simbarashe J Peresuh, Paul-Hugo Arcand, Joseph Confessore, Arianne Parvaresh-Rizi, Edward J Testa, Matthew Quinn, Gabriella Avellino, Michel A Arcand, Alan H Daniels","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01334","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and hip fractures remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate this relationship. We hypothesize that patients prescribed TRT experience a lower rate of hip fractures compared with a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PearlDiver Mariner165 data set was used to obtain two random cohorts of 500,000 patients. The experimental group received TRT for at least 3 months and the control group did not. We used one-to-one matching to evaluate the effects of TRT in 301,724 patients. The incidence of hip fractures was assessed over a 2-year follow-up using the International Classifications of Disease codes. Multivariable logistic regression identified the association between TRT and hip fractures. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients in the TRT group were associated with a lower incidence of hip fractures compared with the control group (0.13% vs. 0.25%, P < 0.001). The multivariable analysis showed that TRT use was associated with a decreased incidence of hip fractures with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.66, P < 0.001). After stratifying by sex, the multivariable analysis showed that TRT use in male patients was associated with a decreased incidence of hip fractures with an aOR of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.53 to 0.72, P < 0.001); in female patients, it was associated with a decreased incidence of hip fractures with an aOR of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.63, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients prescribed TRT had a 1.9 times lower likelihood of sustaining hip fractures. Further investigation into the association of TRT and fragility fractures garners continued interest. In addition, this can provide insight into the potential benefits of TRT use and maintaining bone health to improve bone mass and improve results of orthopaedic interventions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e370-e375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-27DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01501
Kyle A Mani, Anthony P Terraciano, Samuel N Goldman, Manish Bhatta, Vishal Shankar, Rafael De La Garza Ramos, Mitchell S Fourman, Ananth S Eleswarapu
Introduction: Standard spine surgery machine learning (ML) models often rely on structured clinical data, overlooking nuanced free text, such as preoperative surgical notes. The aims of this work were to develop a multimodal ML model combining structured electronic health record (EHR) data with natural language-processed unstructured clinical narratives.
Methods: After testing against Convolutional Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, LightGBM, and Random Forest algorithms, the XGBoost algorithm was selected for model development. Three models were developed: (1) a structured EHR-based ML model; (2) an NLP-based model using preoperative notes; (3) a combined multimodal model. Perioperative outcomes included extended length of stay (≥8.0 days) and nonhome discharge. Preprocessing included tokenization, stemming, and bag-of-words vectorization. Hyperparameters were tuned through grid search and 10-fold cross-validation. Key performance metrics included area-under-the-receiver-operating characteristic curve, Brier score, calibration slope and intercept, precision, recall, and F1 score.
Results: A total of 486 patients (58.8% female, n = 281) were included, with a median age of 61.0 years (interquartile range: 52.0 to 68.0 years) and median body mass index of 29.4 kg/m 2 (interquartile range: 25.1 to 34.5 kg/m 2 ). For extended length of stay, the multimodal model excelled (ROC-AUC: 0.908, Brier: 0.114, F1: 0.896), followed by the NLP-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.868, Brier: 0.132, F1: 0.877), and the XGBoost-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.736, Brier: 0.201, F1: 0.815). For nonhome discharge, the multimodal model led (ROC-AUC: 0.920, Brier: 0.105, F1: 0.907), compared with the NLP-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.892, Brier: 0.102, F1: 0.916) and XGBoost-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.771, Brier: 0.144, F1: 0.893). Explainable AI revealed that body mass index, age, Medicare insurance, Charlson comorbidity index, Medicaid status, Hispanic ethnicity, fusion history, and thoracolumbar and cervical levels of surgery were the most important model features.
Conclusion: Incorporating unstructured surgeon notes into ML models markedly enhanced the prediction of perioperative outcomes in spinal surgery, suggesting that free-text notes may provide greater predictive utility than standard EHR variables.
{"title":"Assessment of Multimodal Natural Language Processing in Ascertaining Perioperative Safety Indicators From Preoperative Notes in Spine Surgery.","authors":"Kyle A Mani, Anthony P Terraciano, Samuel N Goldman, Manish Bhatta, Vishal Shankar, Rafael De La Garza Ramos, Mitchell S Fourman, Ananth S Eleswarapu","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01501","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01501","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard spine surgery machine learning (ML) models often rely on structured clinical data, overlooking nuanced free text, such as preoperative surgical notes. The aims of this work were to develop a multimodal ML model combining structured electronic health record (EHR) data with natural language-processed unstructured clinical narratives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After testing against Convolutional Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, LightGBM, and Random Forest algorithms, the XGBoost algorithm was selected for model development. Three models were developed: (1) a structured EHR-based ML model; (2) an NLP-based model using preoperative notes; (3) a combined multimodal model. Perioperative outcomes included extended length of stay (≥8.0 days) and nonhome discharge. Preprocessing included tokenization, stemming, and bag-of-words vectorization. Hyperparameters were tuned through grid search and 10-fold cross-validation. Key performance metrics included area-under-the-receiver-operating characteristic curve, Brier score, calibration slope and intercept, precision, recall, and F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 486 patients (58.8% female, n = 281) were included, with a median age of 61.0 years (interquartile range: 52.0 to 68.0 years) and median body mass index of 29.4 kg/m 2 (interquartile range: 25.1 to 34.5 kg/m 2 ). For extended length of stay, the multimodal model excelled (ROC-AUC: 0.908, Brier: 0.114, F1: 0.896), followed by the NLP-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.868, Brier: 0.132, F1: 0.877), and the XGBoost-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.736, Brier: 0.201, F1: 0.815). For nonhome discharge, the multimodal model led (ROC-AUC: 0.920, Brier: 0.105, F1: 0.907), compared with the NLP-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.892, Brier: 0.102, F1: 0.916) and XGBoost-only model (ROC-AUC: 0.771, Brier: 0.144, F1: 0.893). Explainable AI revealed that body mass index, age, Medicare insurance, Charlson comorbidity index, Medicaid status, Hispanic ethnicity, fusion history, and thoracolumbar and cervical levels of surgery were the most important model features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating unstructured surgeon notes into ML models markedly enhanced the prediction of perioperative outcomes in spinal surgery, suggesting that free-text notes may provide greater predictive utility than standard EHR variables.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e382-e393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144977680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00829
Sonia E Ubong, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon
Transplant medications are an indispensable component of treatment for patients with autoimmune diseases, malignancy, or solid organ transplants. These immunosuppressive agents, although life preserving, create unique challenges when patients require orthopaedic surgery. With increased survival rates, immunosuppressed transplant patients frequently require orthopaedic intervention, with approximately 5% developing osteonecrosis, 15% to 20% experiencing osteoporotic fractures, and many developing degenerative joint disease necessitating arthroplasty or reconstructive procedures. By inhibiting inflammatory responses, decreasing collagen synthesis, reducing angiogenesis, and impairing cellular proliferation, transplant medications compromise normal immune function and wound healing processes. This physiological interference leads to elevated risks of surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, delayed union, and implant failure-complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization and poorer functional outcomes. Perioperative management becomes even more complex because of the two to fourfold higher incidence of malignancy in long-term immunosuppressed patients, with orthopaedic surgeons frequently treating individuals on both immunosuppressive and antineoplastic therapies. Despite the growing prevalence of orthopaedic procedures in this population, comprehensive guidance on perioperative wound healing management remains fragmented across the literature. This review systematically examines how transplant medications interfere with tissue repair mechanisms and provides evidence-based recommendations for perioperative medication adjustment to optimize surgical outcomes in this high-risk patient group.
{"title":"Transplant Medications and Their Effects on Wound Healing in Orthopaedic Surgery.","authors":"Sonia E Ubong, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00829","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00829","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transplant medications are an indispensable component of treatment for patients with autoimmune diseases, malignancy, or solid organ transplants. These immunosuppressive agents, although life preserving, create unique challenges when patients require orthopaedic surgery. With increased survival rates, immunosuppressed transplant patients frequently require orthopaedic intervention, with approximately 5% developing osteonecrosis, 15% to 20% experiencing osteoporotic fractures, and many developing degenerative joint disease necessitating arthroplasty or reconstructive procedures. By inhibiting inflammatory responses, decreasing collagen synthesis, reducing angiogenesis, and impairing cellular proliferation, transplant medications compromise normal immune function and wound healing processes. This physiological interference leads to elevated risks of surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, delayed union, and implant failure-complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization and poorer functional outcomes. Perioperative management becomes even more complex because of the two to fourfold higher incidence of malignancy in long-term immunosuppressed patients, with orthopaedic surgeons frequently treating individuals on both immunosuppressive and antineoplastic therapies. Despite the growing prevalence of orthopaedic procedures in this population, comprehensive guidance on perioperative wound healing management remains fragmented across the literature. This review systematically examines how transplant medications interfere with tissue repair mechanisms and provides evidence-based recommendations for perioperative medication adjustment to optimize surgical outcomes in this high-risk patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146068459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-01295
Edward T Haupt, Glenn G Shi, Shane A Shapiro
Biologic augmentation, using substances like bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), shows promise for improving outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, particularly in high-risk patients. Historically, autologous bone graft is the benchmark due to its trifecta of osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties, despite its associated donor site morbidity. Current evidence supporting orthobiologics remains fragmented and inconclusive, with a lack of high-level randomized controlled trials (RCTs). BMAC shows fusion rates comparable to autograft in some foot and ankle applications, but PRP evidence is often conflicting due to a lack of preparation standardization. The regulatory environment is complex. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees human cells and tissues (HCT/Ps) through a tiered system: high-risk §351 products (eg, cultured stem cells) require rigorous premarket approval, whereas §361 products (eg, allograft bone) have minimal oversight. BMAC and PRP often bypass this through the Same Surgical Procedure Exemption or are regulated through their processing devices, meaning the biologics themselves are not FDA-approved therapeutics. This regulatory gap and direct-to-consumer marketing necessitate meticulous informed consent, transparently discussing the lack of specific FDA approval, limited evidence, and high out-of-pocket costs. Future success depends on standardized, prospective RCTs and a collaborative "middle-ground pathway" for regulatory approval.
{"title":"The Evidence Basis and Regulatory Framework for Biologic Augmentation of Foot and Ankle Surgeries.","authors":"Edward T Haupt, Glenn G Shi, Shane A Shapiro","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-01295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-01295","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologic augmentation, using substances like bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), shows promise for improving outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, particularly in high-risk patients. Historically, autologous bone graft is the benchmark due to its trifecta of osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties, despite its associated donor site morbidity. Current evidence supporting orthobiologics remains fragmented and inconclusive, with a lack of high-level randomized controlled trials (RCTs). BMAC shows fusion rates comparable to autograft in some foot and ankle applications, but PRP evidence is often conflicting due to a lack of preparation standardization. The regulatory environment is complex. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees human cells and tissues (HCT/Ps) through a tiered system: high-risk §351 products (eg, cultured stem cells) require rigorous premarket approval, whereas §361 products (eg, allograft bone) have minimal oversight. BMAC and PRP often bypass this through the Same Surgical Procedure Exemption or are regulated through their processing devices, meaning the biologics themselves are not FDA-approved therapeutics. This regulatory gap and direct-to-consumer marketing necessitate meticulous informed consent, transparently discussing the lack of specific FDA approval, limited evidence, and high out-of-pocket costs. Future success depends on standardized, prospective RCTs and a collaborative \"middle-ground pathway\" for regulatory approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146068439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-23DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00421
Katelyn L Kirwood, Grant J Dornan, Alexa N Dietrich, Bret M Hatzinger, Jasmine V Hartman Budnik, David A Kuppersmith, Raymond H Kim
Introduction: Postoperative stiffness is a common complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), leading to limited range of motion (ROM), pain, and reduced function. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as factor Xa inhibitors, are commonly prescribed for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis but may increase the risk of postoperative stiffness due to postoperative bleeding within the knee. This study seeks to evaluate the effect of postoperative VTE prophylaxis (factor Xa inhibitors vs. aspirin) on ROM outcomes in patients undergoing TKA.
Methods: A total of 1,054 patients who underwent primary TKA by the senior author between November 2021 and May 2023 were retrospectively identified from an institutional database. Records were examined at preoperative, 2-week, 6-week, <1-year, and >1-year postoperative visits. Logistic regression models analyzed ROM outcomes, defining success as 90° flexion and 0° extension at 2 weeks and 125° flexion and 0° extension at 6 weeks. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) was recorded as a secondary end point.
Results: Factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban or rivaroxaban) did not significantly affect ROM success at 2 weeks (OR = 0.956, 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.866 to 1.054], P = 0.364) or 6 weeks (OR = 0.986, 95% CI [0.892 to 1.089], P = 0.778) postoperatively, compared with aspirin. VTE prophylaxis type was not found to be significantly associated with MUA likelihood.
Discussion: No association was found between postoperative ROM and VTE prophylaxis medication. Previous studies used lower ROM thresholds or focused solely on MUAs. Understanding the effects of DOACs on postoperative stiffness can help guide chemoprophylaxis decisions after TKA.
导语:术后僵硬是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后常见的并发症,导致活动范围受限、疼痛和功能下降。直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs),如Xa因子抑制剂,通常用于静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防,但可能增加术后膝关节内出血导致的术后僵硬风险。本研究旨在评估静脉血栓栓塞术后预防(Xa因子抑制剂与阿司匹林)对TKA患者ROM结局的影响。方法:从一个机构数据库中回顾性地确定了2021年11月至2023年5月期间由资深作者接受原发性TKA的1,054例患者。术前、术后2周、6周、1年复查记录。逻辑回归模型分析了ROM结果,将2周时90°屈曲和0°伸度以及6周时125°屈曲和0°伸度定义为成功。麻醉下操作(MUA)被记录为次要终点。结果:与阿司匹林相比,Xa因子抑制剂(阿哌沙班或利伐沙班)在术后2周(or = 0.956, 95%可信区间[CI, 0.866 ~ 1.054], P = 0.364)或6周(or = 0.986, 95% CI [0.892 ~ 1.089], P = 0.778)对ROM成功无显著影响。静脉血栓栓塞预防类型未发现与MUA可能性显著相关。讨论:术后ROM和静脉血栓栓塞预防用药之间没有关联。以前的研究使用较低的ROM阈值或仅关注mua。了解DOACs对术后僵硬的影响有助于指导TKA后的化学预防决策。
{"title":"Effect of Postoperative Medication on Range of Motion After Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis.","authors":"Katelyn L Kirwood, Grant J Dornan, Alexa N Dietrich, Bret M Hatzinger, Jasmine V Hartman Budnik, David A Kuppersmith, Raymond H Kim","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00421","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative stiffness is a common complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), leading to limited range of motion (ROM), pain, and reduced function. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as factor Xa inhibitors, are commonly prescribed for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis but may increase the risk of postoperative stiffness due to postoperative bleeding within the knee. This study seeks to evaluate the effect of postoperative VTE prophylaxis (factor Xa inhibitors vs. aspirin) on ROM outcomes in patients undergoing TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,054 patients who underwent primary TKA by the senior author between November 2021 and May 2023 were retrospectively identified from an institutional database. Records were examined at preoperative, 2-week, 6-week, <1-year, and >1-year postoperative visits. Logistic regression models analyzed ROM outcomes, defining success as 90° flexion and 0° extension at 2 weeks and 125° flexion and 0° extension at 6 weeks. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) was recorded as a secondary end point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban or rivaroxaban) did not significantly affect ROM success at 2 weeks (OR = 0.956, 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.866 to 1.054], P = 0.364) or 6 weeks (OR = 0.986, 95% CI [0.892 to 1.089], P = 0.778) postoperatively, compared with aspirin. VTE prophylaxis type was not found to be significantly associated with MUA likelihood.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>No association was found between postoperative ROM and VTE prophylaxis medication. Previous studies used lower ROM thresholds or focused solely on MUAs. Understanding the effects of DOACs on postoperative stiffness can help guide chemoprophylaxis decisions after TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146068497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-01069
Yinghao Wang, Shangjie Zhong, Long Zhao, Zongke Zhou, Haoyang Wang
Background: Ondansetron is a cornerstone medication for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in numerous international guidelines. Ondansetron oral soluble pellicles (OSP) represent a needle-free PONV prophylaxis administration regimen with favorable practicality. We conducted this study to investigate the optimal dosing regimen by comparing the efficacy and safety of different doses of ondansetron OSP for preventing PONV following total joint arthroplasty (TJA).
Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, and double-masked clinical trial. A total of 198 patients were randomized into three groups: the control group receiving two placebo pellicles orally 1 hour before anesthesia induction; the preoperation (Preop) 8-mg group receiving one ondansetron OSP (8 mg) plus one placebo pellicles; and the Preop 16-mg group receiving two ondansetron OSP (16 mg total). The primary outcome was the incidence and severity (measured by visual analog scale scores) of PONV within 48 hours after TJA. The secondary outcome included the frequency of tramadol and metoclopramide and the occurrence of ondansetron adverse drug reactions.
Results: Both 8 and 16 mg ondansetron OSP markedly reduced PONV incidence. Compared with the Preop 8-mg group, the Preop 16-mg group demonstrated markedly lower PONV incidence and reduced nausea severity at all postoperative time points relative to the control group, with a greater absolute risk reduction, indicating superior prophylactic efficacy. Adverse drug reactions rates did not differ markedly between the groups.
Conclusions: Compared with placebo, ondansetron OSP effectively reduces the incidence of PONV following TJA and demonstrates a favorable safety profile. The findings suggest a trend toward better efficacy with a preoperative oral dose of 16 mg compared with 8 mg.
Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500097588. Registered on 21 February 2025.
{"title":"Ondansetron Oral Soluble Pellicles Effectively Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yinghao Wang, Shangjie Zhong, Long Zhao, Zongke Zhou, Haoyang Wang","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-01069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-01069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ondansetron is a cornerstone medication for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in numerous international guidelines. Ondansetron oral soluble pellicles (OSP) represent a needle-free PONV prophylaxis administration regimen with favorable practicality. We conducted this study to investigate the optimal dosing regimen by comparing the efficacy and safety of different doses of ondansetron OSP for preventing PONV following total joint arthroplasty (TJA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized, controlled, and double-masked clinical trial. A total of 198 patients were randomized into three groups: the control group receiving two placebo pellicles orally 1 hour before anesthesia induction; the preoperation (Preop) 8-mg group receiving one ondansetron OSP (8 mg) plus one placebo pellicles; and the Preop 16-mg group receiving two ondansetron OSP (16 mg total). The primary outcome was the incidence and severity (measured by visual analog scale scores) of PONV within 48 hours after TJA. The secondary outcome included the frequency of tramadol and metoclopramide and the occurrence of ondansetron adverse drug reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both 8 and 16 mg ondansetron OSP markedly reduced PONV incidence. Compared with the Preop 8-mg group, the Preop 16-mg group demonstrated markedly lower PONV incidence and reduced nausea severity at all postoperative time points relative to the control group, with a greater absolute risk reduction, indicating superior prophylactic efficacy. Adverse drug reactions rates did not differ markedly between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with placebo, ondansetron OSP effectively reduces the incidence of PONV following TJA and demonstrates a favorable safety profile. The findings suggest a trend toward better efficacy with a preoperative oral dose of 16 mg compared with 8 mg.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500097588. Registered on 21 February 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}