Pub Date : 2024-09-17DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00341
Nicholas A Apseloff, Jonathan D Hughes, Brian M Devitt, Volker Musahl
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to increase in incidence despite extensive research into prevention strategies. Many extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors for sustaining ACL injuries have been identified and continue to be investigated. Extrinsic risk factors for ACL injury relate to the athlete's environment, such as the shoe-surface interaction, weather conditions, and sport played. Intrinsic risk factors relate to the athlete's sex, hormones, knee anatomy, landing and pivoting biomechanics, and neuromuscular control. Recent research has highlighted the role of the bony morphology of the proximal tibia and distal femur on primary ACL injury risk, as well as the risk for ACL graft failure. Sex differences in bony and ligamentous morphology of the knee, neuromuscular control, and hormonal factors, such as serum relaxin levels and variations within the menstrual cycle, have been correlated with a higher risk of noncontact primary ACL injuries in female athletes compared with male athletes.
{"title":"Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Extrinsic and Intrinsic Risk Factors.","authors":"Nicholas A Apseloff, Jonathan D Hughes, Brian M Devitt, Volker Musahl","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00341","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continue to increase in incidence despite extensive research into prevention strategies. Many extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors for sustaining ACL injuries have been identified and continue to be investigated. Extrinsic risk factors for ACL injury relate to the athlete's environment, such as the shoe-surface interaction, weather conditions, and sport played. Intrinsic risk factors relate to the athlete's sex, hormones, knee anatomy, landing and pivoting biomechanics, and neuromuscular control. Recent research has highlighted the role of the bony morphology of the proximal tibia and distal femur on primary ACL injury risk, as well as the risk for ACL graft failure. Sex differences in bony and ligamentous morphology of the knee, neuromuscular control, and hormonal factors, such as serum relaxin levels and variations within the menstrual cycle, have been correlated with a higher risk of noncontact primary ACL injuries in female athletes compared with male athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-07-30DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00311
Steven J Girdler, Matthew H Lindsey, Arjun S Sebastian, Ahmad Nassr
Osteoporosis is a global health problem affecting over 200 million people worldwide and 54 million adults in the United States. Approximately half of all postmenopausal women will have an osteoporosis-related fracture during their lifetime. In the United States, the direct medical cost related to osteoporosis is expected to exceed $25 billion by 2025. Management of osteoporosis in vertebral fractures and elective spine surgery is of the utmost concern, given the high prevalence of osteoporosis in the general population and the increased risk of complication in this population. New pharmacologic treatment options such as anabolic medications and diagnostic tools including Hounsfield unit measurements on routine computed tomography scans are available to orthopaedic and spinal surgeons to help best manage this condition. This review serves as an update to diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal surgery.
{"title":"Osteoporosis Evaluation and Management in Spine Surgery.","authors":"Steven J Girdler, Matthew H Lindsey, Arjun S Sebastian, Ahmad Nassr","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00311","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteoporosis is a global health problem affecting over 200 million people worldwide and 54 million adults in the United States. Approximately half of all postmenopausal women will have an osteoporosis-related fracture during their lifetime. In the United States, the direct medical cost related to osteoporosis is expected to exceed $25 billion by 2025. Management of osteoporosis in vertebral fractures and elective spine surgery is of the utmost concern, given the high prevalence of osteoporosis in the general population and the increased risk of complication in this population. New pharmacologic treatment options such as anabolic medications and diagnostic tools including Hounsfield unit measurements on routine computed tomography scans are available to orthopaedic and spinal surgeons to help best manage this condition. This review serves as an update to diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-07-10DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00889
Yusuke Hori, Tyler C McDonald, Patrick Thornley, Luiz Carlos Almeida da Silva, Burak Kaymaz, Kenneth J Rogers, Petya K Yorgova, Michael B Bober, Ricki Carroll, Richard W Kruse, Jeanne M Franzone, Suken A Shah
Introduction: The surgical management of severe scoliosis in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is challenging because of curve rigidity, small stature, and inherent bone fragility. This study evaluated the midterm outcomes of our multimodal approach to address these issues, integrating perioperative bisphosphonate therapy, preoperative/intraoperative traction, various osteotomies, segmental pedicle screw instrumentation with cement augmentation, and bone morphogenetic protein-2 application.
Methods: A single-center retrospective review of 30 patients (average age 14.1 ± 2.2 years; 18 were female) diagnosed with OI and scoliosis was conducted. These patients underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2008 and 2020 and completed a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We measured radiographic parameters at each visit and reviewed the incidence of complications. A mixed-effects model was used to evaluate changes in radiographic parameters from preoperative measurements to the first and latest follow-ups.
Results: The patient cohort consisted of 2 individuals with type I OI, 20 with type III, 6 with type IV, and 2 with other types (types V and VIII). Surgical intervention led to a notable improvement in the major curve magnitude from 76° to 36°, with no notable correction loss. In addition, the minor curve, apical vertical translation, lowest instrumented vertebra tilt, and pelvic obliquity were also improved. In the sagittal plane, thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis remained unchanged while thoracolumbar kyphosis markedly improved. Two patients experienced proximal junctional kyphosis with screw pullout, one of whom required revision surgery. One patient developed a superficial infection that was successfully treated with oral antibiotics. No instances of neurologic deficits or cement extravasation were observed.
Discussion: This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of our multimodal approach to treating scoliosis in patients with OI, achieving a 53% major curve correction with minimal complications over 2-year follow-up. These findings provide notable insights into managing scoliosis in this population.
Level of evidence: Level IV (case series).
导言:对成骨不全症(OI)患者的严重脊柱侧弯进行手术治疗具有挑战性,因为患者的曲线僵硬、身材矮小、骨质脆弱。本研究评估了我们采用多模式方法解决这些问题的中期效果,包括围手术期双磷酸盐治疗、术前/术中牵引、各种截骨术、节段椎弓根螺钉器械加骨水泥增强以及骨形态发生蛋白-2应用:对 30 名确诊为 OI 和脊柱侧凸的患者(平均年龄为 14.1 ± 2.2 岁;18 名女性)进行了单中心回顾性研究。这些患者在 2008 年至 2020 年期间接受了脊柱后路融合术,并完成了至少 2 年的随访。我们测量了每次就诊时的放射学参数,并回顾了并发症的发生率。我们使用混合效应模型来评估从术前测量到首次和最近一次随访期间放射学参数的变化:患者队列中包括 2 名 I 型 OI 患者、20 名 III 型患者、6 名 IV 型患者和 2 名其他类型患者(V 型和 VIII 型)。手术治疗显著改善了患者的主要弧度,从 76° 降至 36°,且没有明显的矫正损失。此外,小曲线、顶端垂直平移、最低器械椎体倾斜和骨盆倾斜也得到了改善。在矢状面,胸椎后凸和腰椎前凸保持不变,而胸腰椎后凸明显改善。两名患者因螺钉脱出而出现近端交界处驼背,其中一人需要进行翻修手术。一名患者出现表皮感染,经口服抗生素治疗后成功治愈。未发现神经功能缺损或骨水泥外渗的情况:这项研究证明了我们采用多模式方法治疗OI患者脊柱侧凸的有效性和安全性,在两年的随访中,主要曲线矫正率达到53%,并发症极少。这些研究结果为该人群脊柱侧凸的治疗提供了值得注意的见解:证据级别:IV级(病例系列)
{"title":"Midterm Outcomes of Multimodal Approach to Treating Severe Scoliosis in Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta.","authors":"Yusuke Hori, Tyler C McDonald, Patrick Thornley, Luiz Carlos Almeida da Silva, Burak Kaymaz, Kenneth J Rogers, Petya K Yorgova, Michael B Bober, Ricki Carroll, Richard W Kruse, Jeanne M Franzone, Suken A Shah","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00889","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The surgical management of severe scoliosis in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is challenging because of curve rigidity, small stature, and inherent bone fragility. This study evaluated the midterm outcomes of our multimodal approach to address these issues, integrating perioperative bisphosphonate therapy, preoperative/intraoperative traction, various osteotomies, segmental pedicle screw instrumentation with cement augmentation, and bone morphogenetic protein-2 application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review of 30 patients (average age 14.1 ± 2.2 years; 18 were female) diagnosed with OI and scoliosis was conducted. These patients underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2008 and 2020 and completed a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We measured radiographic parameters at each visit and reviewed the incidence of complications. A mixed-effects model was used to evaluate changes in radiographic parameters from preoperative measurements to the first and latest follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient cohort consisted of 2 individuals with type I OI, 20 with type III, 6 with type IV, and 2 with other types (types V and VIII). Surgical intervention led to a notable improvement in the major curve magnitude from 76° to 36°, with no notable correction loss. In addition, the minor curve, apical vertical translation, lowest instrumented vertebra tilt, and pelvic obliquity were also improved. In the sagittal plane, thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis remained unchanged while thoracolumbar kyphosis markedly improved. Two patients experienced proximal junctional kyphosis with screw pullout, one of whom required revision surgery. One patient developed a superficial infection that was successfully treated with oral antibiotics. No instances of neurologic deficits or cement extravasation were observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of our multimodal approach to treating scoliosis in patients with OI, achieving a 53% major curve correction with minimal complications over 2-year follow-up. These findings provide notable insights into managing scoliosis in this population.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV (case series).</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141602131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-05-28DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00244
Michael J Lee, Douglas J Weaver, Mostafa H El Dafrawy
Paired vertebral arteries (VAs) travel from the subclavian artery through the cervical spine and into the intracranial space where they contribute to posterior cerebral circulation. Blunt and penetrating injuries to the cervical spine risk injury to the VA. Among the most feared complications of vertebral artery injury (VAI) is posterior circulation stroke. Appropriate screening and treatment of these injuries in the trauma setting remain vitally important to aid in the prevention of devastating neurologic sequelae. A robust knowledge of the VA anatomy is required for spine surgeons to avoid VAI during cervical spine approaches and instrumentation. Both anterior and posterior cervical spine surgeries can place the VA at risk. Careful preoperative assessment with the appropriate advanced imaging studies is necessary to verify the course of the VA in the cervical spine and thus prevent iatrogenic injury because anatomic variations along the course of the artery can prove hazardous if not properly anticipated. Iatrogenic VAI can be treated successfully with tamponade. However, in some cases, ligation, repair, or endovascular procedures may be indicated.
成对的椎动脉(VAs)从锁骨下动脉穿过颈椎,进入颅内空间,在那里参与大脑后循环。颈椎受到钝器或穿透性损伤都有可能损伤椎动脉。椎动脉损伤(VAI)最可怕的并发症是后循环中风。在创伤环境中对这些损伤进行适当的筛查和治疗对于预防破坏性神经系统后遗症仍然至关重要。脊柱外科医生需要对 VA 的解剖结构有深入的了解,才能在颈椎入路和器械操作过程中避免 VAI。颈椎前路和后路手术都有可能危及VA。有必要通过适当的先进成像检查进行仔细的术前评估,以核实 VA 在颈椎中的走向,从而避免先天性损伤,因为如果没有适当的预期,动脉走向的解剖变化可能会带来危险。先天性 VAI 可以通过填塞成功治疗。但在某些情况下,可能需要进行结扎、修复或血管内手术。
{"title":"Extracranial Vertebral Artery Injuries.","authors":"Michael J Lee, Douglas J Weaver, Mostafa H El Dafrawy","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00244","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paired vertebral arteries (VAs) travel from the subclavian artery through the cervical spine and into the intracranial space where they contribute to posterior cerebral circulation. Blunt and penetrating injuries to the cervical spine risk injury to the VA. Among the most feared complications of vertebral artery injury (VAI) is posterior circulation stroke. Appropriate screening and treatment of these injuries in the trauma setting remain vitally important to aid in the prevention of devastating neurologic sequelae. A robust knowledge of the VA anatomy is required for spine surgeons to avoid VAI during cervical spine approaches and instrumentation. Both anterior and posterior cervical spine surgeries can place the VA at risk. Careful preoperative assessment with the appropriate advanced imaging studies is necessary to verify the course of the VA in the cervical spine and thus prevent iatrogenic injury because anatomic variations along the course of the artery can prove hazardous if not properly anticipated. Iatrogenic VAI can be treated successfully with tamponade. However, in some cases, ligation, repair, or endovascular procedures may be indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-05-08DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00056
Nicholas B Pohl, Rajkishen Narayanan, Parker L Brush, Yunsoo Lee, Rabia Qureshi, Arun Kanhere, M Lauren Micou, Sebastian I Fras, Ian David Kaye, John J Mangan, Mark F Kurd, Michael J Mehnert, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
Introduction: Double-crush syndrome (DCS) represents a condition that involves peripheral nerve compression in combination with spinal nerve root impingement. The purpose of this study was to compare electrodiagnostic study (EDS) results in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) for carpal tunnel syndrome with those undergoing both CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for DCS.
Methods: Patients receiving an isolated CTR were compared with those undergoing CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion within two years of CTR. The latter group was defined as our DCS cohort. Electrodiagnostic study results were collected which included sensory and motor nerve conduction data as well as electromyogram (EMG) findings. All electrodiagnostic studies were done before CTR in both sets of patients.
Results: Fifty-four patients with DCS and 137 CTR-only patients were included. Patients with DCS were found to have decreased sensory onset latency (3.51 vs 4.01; P = 0.015) and peak latency (4.25 vs 5.17; P = 0.004) compared with the CTR-only patients. Patients with DCS had slower wrist motor velocity (30.5 vs 47.7; P = 0.012), decreased elbow motor latency (9.62 vs 10.6; P = 0.015), and faster elbow motor velocity (56.0 vs 49.4; P = 0.031). EMG results showed that patients with DCS were more likely to have positive findings in the biceps (31.9% vs 1.96%; P < 0.001) and triceps (24.4% vs 2.97%; P < 0.001), but not abductor pollicis brevis (APB) (45.7% vs 37.9%; P = 0.459).
Conclusion: We identified changes on EDS between patients with and without DCS. In patients with DCS, sensory nerve studies showed shorter peak and onset latency than in CTR-only patients. Interestingly, DCS and CTR-only patients had different patterns of wrist and elbow motor nerve conduction. Providers observing positive EMG findings proximal to the APB should raise their suspicion for possible cervical radiculopathy and when present with carpal tunnel syndrome-like symptoms, should also consider DCS in their diagnostic differential.
简介双挤压综合征(DCS)是一种周围神经受压并伴有脊神经根撞击的病症。本研究旨在比较接受腕管松解术(CTR)治疗腕管综合征的患者与同时接受CTR和颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术治疗双挤压综合征的患者的电诊断研究(EDS)结果:将单独接受腕管松解术的患者与在腕管松解术后两年内同时接受腕管松解术和颈椎前路椎间盘切除及融合术的患者进行比较。后一组患者被定义为我们的 DCS 队列。收集的电诊断研究结果包括感觉和运动神经传导数据以及肌电图(EMG)结果。两组患者的所有电诊断检查均在 CTR 之前完成:结果:纳入了 54 名 DCS 患者和 137 名仅接受 CTR 的患者。与仅接受 CTR 的患者相比,DCS 患者的感觉起始潜伏期(3.51 vs 4.01;P = 0.015)和峰值潜伏期(4.25 vs 5.17;P = 0.004)均有所缩短。DCS患者的腕部运动速度较慢(30.5 vs 47.7;P = 0.012),肘部运动潜伏期较短(9.62 vs 10.6;P = 0.015),肘部运动速度较快(56.0 vs 49.4;P = 0.031)。EMG结果显示,DCS患者的肱二头肌(31.9% vs 1.96%;P <0.001)和肱三头肌(24.4% vs 2.97%;P <0.001)出现阳性结果的几率更高,但股骨外展肌(APB)(45.7% vs 37.9%;P = 0.459)却不高:我们发现了患有和未患有 DCS 的患者在 EDS 上的变化。与仅有 CTR 的患者相比,DCS 患者的感觉神经研究显示出更短的峰值和起始潜伏期。有趣的是,DCS 和纯 CTR 患者的腕部和肘部运动神经传导模式不同。医务人员在观察到APB近端EMG阳性结果时,应怀疑可能存在颈椎病,当出现类似腕管综合征的症状时,也应在诊断鉴别中考虑DCS。
{"title":"Preoperative Electrodiagnostic Study Findings Differ Between Patients With Double-crush Syndrome and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Propensity Matched Analysis.","authors":"Nicholas B Pohl, Rajkishen Narayanan, Parker L Brush, Yunsoo Lee, Rabia Qureshi, Arun Kanhere, M Lauren Micou, Sebastian I Fras, Ian David Kaye, John J Mangan, Mark F Kurd, Michael J Mehnert, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00056","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Double-crush syndrome (DCS) represents a condition that involves peripheral nerve compression in combination with spinal nerve root impingement. The purpose of this study was to compare electrodiagnostic study (EDS) results in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) for carpal tunnel syndrome with those undergoing both CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for DCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving an isolated CTR were compared with those undergoing CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion within two years of CTR. The latter group was defined as our DCS cohort. Electrodiagnostic study results were collected which included sensory and motor nerve conduction data as well as electromyogram (EMG) findings. All electrodiagnostic studies were done before CTR in both sets of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients with DCS and 137 CTR-only patients were included. Patients with DCS were found to have decreased sensory onset latency (3.51 vs 4.01; P = 0.015) and peak latency (4.25 vs 5.17; P = 0.004) compared with the CTR-only patients. Patients with DCS had slower wrist motor velocity (30.5 vs 47.7; P = 0.012), decreased elbow motor latency (9.62 vs 10.6; P = 0.015), and faster elbow motor velocity (56.0 vs 49.4; P = 0.031). EMG results showed that patients with DCS were more likely to have positive findings in the biceps (31.9% vs 1.96%; P < 0.001) and triceps (24.4% vs 2.97%; P < 0.001), but not abductor pollicis brevis (APB) (45.7% vs 37.9%; P = 0.459).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified changes on EDS between patients with and without DCS. In patients with DCS, sensory nerve studies showed shorter peak and onset latency than in CTR-only patients. Interestingly, DCS and CTR-only patients had different patterns of wrist and elbow motor nerve conduction. Providers observing positive EMG findings proximal to the APB should raise their suspicion for possible cervical radiculopathy and when present with carpal tunnel syndrome-like symptoms, should also consider DCS in their diagnostic differential.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140900305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00582
Devan O Higginbotham, Mouhanad M El-Othmani, Fong H Nham, Daniel Alsoof, Bassel G Diebo, Scott A McCarty, Alan H Daniels
Introduction: While perioperative nutritional, functional, and bone health status optimization in spine surgery is supported with ample evidence, the implementation and surgeon perception regarding such efforts in clinical practice remain largely unexplored. This study sought to assess the current perception of spine surgeons and implementation regarding the nutritional, functional status, and bone health perioperative optimization.
Methods: An anonymous 30-question survey was distributed to orthopaedic spine fellowship and neurosurgery program directors identified through the North American Spine Society and American Association of Neurological Surgeons contact databases.
Results: The questionnaire was completed by 51 surgeon survey respondents. Among those, 62% reported no current formal nutritional optimization protocols with 14% not recommending an optimization plan, despite only 10% doubting benefits of nutritional optimization. While 5% of respondents perceived functional status optimization as nonbeneficial, 68% of respondents reported no protocol in place and 46% noted a functional status assessment relying on patient dependency. Among the respondents, 85% routinely ordered DEXA scan if there was suspicion of osteoporosis and 85% usually rescheduled surgery if bone health optimization goals were not achieved while 6% reported being suspicious of benefit from such interventions.
Conclusion: While most responding spine surgeons believe in the benefit of perioperative nutritional and functional optimization, logistical and patient compliance challenges were noted as critical barriers toward optimization. Understanding surgeon perception and current practices may guide future efforts toward advancement of optimization protocols.
{"title":"Perioperative Nutritional, Functional, and Bone Health Optimization in Spine Surgery: A National Investigation of Spine Surgeons' Perceptions and Practices.","authors":"Devan O Higginbotham, Mouhanad M El-Othmani, Fong H Nham, Daniel Alsoof, Bassel G Diebo, Scott A McCarty, Alan H Daniels","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00582","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00582","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While perioperative nutritional, functional, and bone health status optimization in spine surgery is supported with ample evidence, the implementation and surgeon perception regarding such efforts in clinical practice remain largely unexplored. This study sought to assess the current perception of spine surgeons and implementation regarding the nutritional, functional status, and bone health perioperative optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous 30-question survey was distributed to orthopaedic spine fellowship and neurosurgery program directors identified through the North American Spine Society and American Association of Neurological Surgeons contact databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 51 surgeon survey respondents. Among those, 62% reported no current formal nutritional optimization protocols with 14% not recommending an optimization plan, despite only 10% doubting benefits of nutritional optimization. While 5% of respondents perceived functional status optimization as nonbeneficial, 68% of respondents reported no protocol in place and 46% noted a functional status assessment relying on patient dependency. Among the respondents, 85% routinely ordered DEXA scan if there was suspicion of osteoporosis and 85% usually rescheduled surgery if bone health optimization goals were not achieved while 6% reported being suspicious of benefit from such interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most responding spine surgeons believe in the benefit of perioperative nutritional and functional optimization, logistical and patient compliance challenges were noted as critical barriers toward optimization. Understanding surgeon perception and current practices may guide future efforts toward advancement of optimization protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141075873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-05-14DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00152
Scott Yang, Burt Yaszay, Jennifer Bauer
Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is potentially the most nuanced decision a surgeon has to make. This article reviews the literature on the range-of-motion loss related to the LIV, ability to return to sports based on LIV, correlation between LIV and disk degeneration, and short-term and long-term clinical outcomes related to LIV.
{"title":"The Clinical Significance of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.","authors":"Scott Yang, Burt Yaszay, Jennifer Bauer","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00152","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is potentially the most nuanced decision a surgeon has to make. This article reviews the literature on the range-of-motion loss related to the LIV, ability to return to sports based on LIV, correlation between LIV and disk degeneration, and short-term and long-term clinical outcomes related to LIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140946525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-07-12DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00120
Hannah A Levy, Payton Boere, Zane Randell, John Bodnar, John Paulik, Nicholas T Spina, William R Spiker, Brandon D Lawrence, Darrel S Brodke, Mark F Kurd, Jeffrey A Rihn, Jose A Canseco, Gregory D Schroeder, Christopher K Kepler, Alexander R Vaccaro, Bradford Currier, Paul M Huddleston, Ahmad N Nassr, Brett A Freedman, Arjun S Sebastian, Alan S Hilibrand, Brian A Karamian
Introduction: The factors most important in the spine fellowship match may not ultimately correlate with quality of performance during fellowship. This study examined the spine fellow applicant metrics correlated with high application rank compared with the metrics associated with the strongest clinical performance during fellowship.
Methods: Spine fellow applications at three academic institutions were retrieved from the San Francisco Match database (first available to 2021) and deidentified for application review. Application metrics pertaining to research, academics, education, extracurriculars, leadership, examinations, career interests, and letter of recommendations were extracted. Attending spine surgeons involved in spine fellow selection at their institutions were sent a survey to rank (1) fellow applicants based on their perceived candidacy and (2) the strength of performance of their previous fellows. Pearson correlation assessed the associations of application metrics with theoretical fellow rank and actual performance.
Results: A total of 37 spine fellow applications were included (Institution A: 15, Institution B: 12, Institution C: 10), rated by 14 spine surgeons (Institution A: 6, Institution B: 4, Institution C: 4). Theoretical fellow rank demonstrated a moderate positive association with overall research, residency program rank, recommendation writer H-index, US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, and journal reviewer positions. Actual fellow performance demonstrated a moderate positive association with residency program rank, recommendation writer H-index, USMLE scores, and journal reviewer positions. Linear regressions identified journal reviewer positions (ß = 1.73, P = 0.002), Step 1 (ß = 0.09, P = 0.010) and Step 3 (ß = 0.10, P = 0.002) scores, recommendation writer H-index (ß = 0.06, P = 0.029, and ß = 0.07, P = 0.006), and overall research (ß = 0.01, P = 0.005) as predictors of theoretical rank. Recommendation writer H-index (ß = 0.21, P = 0.030) and Alpha Omega Alpha achievement (ß = 6.88, P = 0.021) predicted actual performance.
Conclusion: Residency program reputation, USMLE scores, and a recommendation from an established spine surgeon were important in application review and performance during fellowship. Research productivity, although important during application review, was not predictive of fellow performance.
{"title":"Factors Related to Clinical Performance in Spine Surgery Fellowship: Can We Predict Success.","authors":"Hannah A Levy, Payton Boere, Zane Randell, John Bodnar, John Paulik, Nicholas T Spina, William R Spiker, Brandon D Lawrence, Darrel S Brodke, Mark F Kurd, Jeffrey A Rihn, Jose A Canseco, Gregory D Schroeder, Christopher K Kepler, Alexander R Vaccaro, Bradford Currier, Paul M Huddleston, Ahmad N Nassr, Brett A Freedman, Arjun S Sebastian, Alan S Hilibrand, Brian A Karamian","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00120","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The factors most important in the spine fellowship match may not ultimately correlate with quality of performance during fellowship. This study examined the spine fellow applicant metrics correlated with high application rank compared with the metrics associated with the strongest clinical performance during fellowship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spine fellow applications at three academic institutions were retrieved from the San Francisco Match database (first available to 2021) and deidentified for application review. Application metrics pertaining to research, academics, education, extracurriculars, leadership, examinations, career interests, and letter of recommendations were extracted. Attending spine surgeons involved in spine fellow selection at their institutions were sent a survey to rank (1) fellow applicants based on their perceived candidacy and (2) the strength of performance of their previous fellows. Pearson correlation assessed the associations of application metrics with theoretical fellow rank and actual performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 spine fellow applications were included (Institution A: 15, Institution B: 12, Institution C: 10), rated by 14 spine surgeons (Institution A: 6, Institution B: 4, Institution C: 4). Theoretical fellow rank demonstrated a moderate positive association with overall research, residency program rank, recommendation writer H-index, US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, and journal reviewer positions. Actual fellow performance demonstrated a moderate positive association with residency program rank, recommendation writer H-index, USMLE scores, and journal reviewer positions. Linear regressions identified journal reviewer positions (ß = 1.73, P = 0.002), Step 1 (ß = 0.09, P = 0.010) and Step 3 (ß = 0.10, P = 0.002) scores, recommendation writer H-index (ß = 0.06, P = 0.029, and ß = 0.07, P = 0.006), and overall research (ß = 0.01, P = 0.005) as predictors of theoretical rank. Recommendation writer H-index (ß = 0.21, P = 0.030) and Alpha Omega Alpha achievement (ß = 6.88, P = 0.021) predicted actual performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Residency program reputation, USMLE scores, and a recommendation from an established spine surgeon were important in application review and performance during fellowship. Research productivity, although important during application review, was not predictive of fellow performance.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-05-07DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00799
Jason J Haselhuhn, Dustin J Kress, Morgan M Whyte, Paul Brian O Soriano, David W Polly
Introduction: The prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology generating lower back pain is increasing, often requiring SI joint fusion in refractory cases. Similarly, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an increasing procedure in the older growing population. Prior SIJ fusion in patients undergoing THA has increased hip dislocation. This study aims to determine the prevalence of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution.
Methods: After institutional review board approval, we completed a retrospective review of consecutive SIJ fusion cases performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeons between October 2019 and June 2022. The senior surgeon reviewed pelvis radiographs to determine whether a THA was present. Patient demographics, surgical history, SIJ fusion date, and laterality information from study participants' medical records were collected and analyzed.
Results: We screened 157 consecutive cases and excluded 45 not meeting the inclusion criteria. One hundred twelve radiographs were reviewed, with seven additional patients excluded. The final analysis consisted of 105 patients (33M:72F). The mean age was 50.4 ± 13.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.1 ± 6.1 kg/m 2 . SIJ fusion laterality included 51 right (48.6%), 44 left (41.9%), and 10 bilateral (9.5%). One patient (0.95%) had a preexisting right THA, and two patients (1.9%) underwent ipsilateral THA after SIJ fusion.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated a low prevalence (0.95%) of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution, similar to the THA prevalence of the total US population. Additional research is needed to determine the outcomes of patients with preexisting THA undergoing SIJ fusion.
{"title":"The Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Patient Population and Its Prevalence of Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Jason J Haselhuhn, Dustin J Kress, Morgan M Whyte, Paul Brian O Soriano, David W Polly","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00799","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00799","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology generating lower back pain is increasing, often requiring SI joint fusion in refractory cases. Similarly, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an increasing procedure in the older growing population. Prior SIJ fusion in patients undergoing THA has increased hip dislocation. This study aims to determine the prevalence of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional review board approval, we completed a retrospective review of consecutive SIJ fusion cases performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeons between October 2019 and June 2022. The senior surgeon reviewed pelvis radiographs to determine whether a THA was present. Patient demographics, surgical history, SIJ fusion date, and laterality information from study participants' medical records were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 157 consecutive cases and excluded 45 not meeting the inclusion criteria. One hundred twelve radiographs were reviewed, with seven additional patients excluded. The final analysis consisted of 105 patients (33M:72F). The mean age was 50.4 ± 13.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 29.1 ± 6.1 kg/m 2 . SIJ fusion laterality included 51 right (48.6%), 44 left (41.9%), and 10 bilateral (9.5%). One patient (0.95%) had a preexisting right THA, and two patients (1.9%) underwent ipsilateral THA after SIJ fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a low prevalence (0.95%) of preexisting THA in SIJ fusion patients at our institution, similar to the THA prevalence of the total US population. Additional research is needed to determine the outcomes of patients with preexisting THA undergoing SIJ fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140892073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-15Epub Date: 2024-05-08DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01124
Lauren M Boden, John G Heller, Jeffrey S Fischgrund
Introduction: Although osteoporosis and low bone mineral density is thought to lead to poor fusion outcomes, few studies have adequately addressed the correlation, and they were limited by small sample size at a single institution.
Methods: We completed a secondary analysis of 182 patients enrolled at 26 spine centers across the United States in the EXO-SPINE FDA-approved clinical trial with 12-month CT-based fusion status determined by two independent, blinded radiologists. Using previously described CT-based techniques, we measured local and global Hounsfield units (HU) and examined the relationship with radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Results: CT scans were available for review from 95 patients, with a mean age of 56.2 years and mean global density of 153.0 HU. No relationship was observed between HU and radiographic fusion status or clinical outcomes. Although 12% of patients had lumbar vertebral body HU measurements consistent with osteoporosis, this classification had no relation with fusion or clinical outcomes. Patients with pseudarthrosis had higher Oswestry Disability Index (22.2 vs. 16.6, P = 0.037) and back pain visual analog scale (7.0 vs. 4.9, P = 0.014) scores than patients with at least unilateral fusion at the 12-month follow-up.
Discussion: In this large, multicenter study, lower vertebral body HU was not associated with worse fusion status after single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using only local autologous bone graft. However, there was an association between radiographic fusion status and clinical outcomes, validating the importance of determining predictors of successful fusion. Assessment of fusion status with CT scans yielded a much lower fusion success rate with local bone graft than previously reported and may warrant additional investigation.
简介:尽管骨质疏松症和低骨矿物质密度被认为会导致融合术效果不佳,但很少有研究能充分探讨两者之间的相关性:尽管骨质疏松症和低骨矿物质密度被认为会导致不良的融合结果,但很少有研究充分探讨了这种相关性,而且这些研究受限于单一机构的小样本量:我们对美国 26 家脊柱中心的 182 名患者进行了二次分析,这些患者参加了 EXO-SPINE FDA 批准的临床试验,并由两名独立的盲人放射科医生确定了 12 个月的 CT 融合状况。我们使用以前描述过的基于 CT 的技术测量了局部和整体 Hounsfield 单位 (HU),并研究了与放射学和临床结果之间的关系:95名患者的CT扫描结果可供审查,他们的平均年龄为56.2岁,平均整体密度为153.0 HU。没有观察到 HU 与放射学融合状态或临床结果之间的关系。虽然有 12% 的患者腰椎体 HU 值与骨质疏松症相符,但这一分类与融合或临床结果无关。在12个月的随访中,假关节患者的Oswestry残疾指数(22.2 vs. 16.6,P = 0.037)和背痛视觉模拟量表(7.0 vs. 4.9,P = 0.014)评分高于至少进行了单侧融合的患者:讨论:在这项大型多中心研究中,较低的椎体HU与仅使用局部自体骨移植的单水平器械后外侧腰椎融合术后较差的融合状态无关。然而,放射学融合状态与临床结果之间存在关联,这验证了确定成功融合预测因素的重要性。用CT扫描评估融合状态得出的局部植骨融合成功率比之前的报道要低得多,可能需要进一步研究。
{"title":"Association of Poor Bone Quality with Pseudarthrosis and Poor Clinical Outcomes in Single-Level Instrumented Lumbar Arthrodesis Using Local Autologous Bone Graft.","authors":"Lauren M Boden, John G Heller, Jeffrey S Fischgrund","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01124","DOIUrl":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although osteoporosis and low bone mineral density is thought to lead to poor fusion outcomes, few studies have adequately addressed the correlation, and they were limited by small sample size at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a secondary analysis of 182 patients enrolled at 26 spine centers across the United States in the EXO-SPINE FDA-approved clinical trial with 12-month CT-based fusion status determined by two independent, blinded radiologists. Using previously described CT-based techniques, we measured local and global Hounsfield units (HU) and examined the relationship with radiographic and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT scans were available for review from 95 patients, with a mean age of 56.2 years and mean global density of 153.0 HU. No relationship was observed between HU and radiographic fusion status or clinical outcomes. Although 12% of patients had lumbar vertebral body HU measurements consistent with osteoporosis, this classification had no relation with fusion or clinical outcomes. Patients with pseudarthrosis had higher Oswestry Disability Index (22.2 vs. 16.6, P = 0.037) and back pain visual analog scale (7.0 vs. 4.9, P = 0.014) scores than patients with at least unilateral fusion at the 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this large, multicenter study, lower vertebral body HU was not associated with worse fusion status after single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using only local autologous bone graft. However, there was an association between radiographic fusion status and clinical outcomes, validating the importance of determining predictors of successful fusion. Assessment of fusion status with CT scans yielded a much lower fusion success rate with local bone graft than previously reported and may warrant additional investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140900231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}