Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons最新文献

Background: Despite widespread acceptance of the importance of diversity in leadership, systemic challenges in leadership attainment in orthopaedic surgery still exist for several groups. We hypothesize that women, underrepresented in medicine groups, and Asians have decreased odds of achieving program director and chairperson positions compared with peers.

Methods: Demographic data were collected from the Association of American Medical Colleges for faculty, program directors, and chairpersons in orthopaedic surgery. Odds ratios were calculated treating race, ethnicity, or sex as the predictor variables and attainment of a leadership position as the outcome, comparing the composition of program directors in 2020 and chairpersons in 2019 with faculty in 2019.

Results: Significantly decreased odds were found for women at 0.37 (0.264 to 0.51 [ P < 0.0001]) and the Other category at 0.16 (0.065 to 0.3864 [ P = 0.0001]) while significantly increased odds were found for White and Black/African American faculty at 1.32 (1.02 to 1.71 [ P = 0.0314]) and 1.95 (1.17 to 3.26 [ P = 0.011]), respectively, in holding program director positions. Significantly decreased odds of attaining chairpersonship were found for women at 0.17 (0.07 to 0.41 [ P = 0.0075]) and Asian faculty at 0.33 (0.14 to 0.75 [ P = 0.0062]) while White faculty demonstrated significantly increased odds at 2.43 (1.41 to 4.19 [ P = 0.0013]).

Conclusions: Women showed markedly decreased odds of leadership attainment while Black/African American faculty had increased likelihood of becoming program directors but were not markedly more likely to become chairs. Asian faculty were less likely to become program directors and markedly less likely to become chairs. While decreased odds for women were expected based on current literature, decreased odds of Asians becoming chairs and an increased likelihood of Black/African American orthopaedic surgeons becoming program directors but not attaining the role of chairs at the same rate were novel findings, revealing concerning trends for these groups.

Distal radius fractures are the most common skeletal injuries requiring intervention in children. These injuries are classified by fracture pattern, location, displacement, and angulation. While each unique fracture pattern warrants slightly modified treatment plans and follow-up, the goals of treatment remain constant. Successful outcomes depend on restoration of motion and function, and attaining acceptable sagittal and coronal alignment is a necessary first step. For displaced fractures, closed reduction is often necessary to restore alignment; well-molded cast application is important to maintain fracture alignment. Fractures with bayonet apposition, if well aligned, may not need formal reduction in some patients. Special attention should be paid to the physis-not only for physeal-involving fractures but also for all distal radius fractures-given that the proximity to the physis and amount of remaining skeletal growth help guide treatment decisions. Casting technique is essential in optimizing the best chance in maintaining fracture reduction. Surgical intervention may be indicated for a subset of fractures when acceptable alignment is not achieved or is lost at subsequent follow-up. Even among experts in the field, there is little consensus as to the optimal treatment of displaced metaphyseal fractures, illustrating the need for prospective, randomized studies to establish best practices.

Loss of shoulder function can be a complex condition to manage. Specifically, the definition between the terms pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis remains inconsistent in the literature based on various factors including chronicity, present pathology, and the role of pain in the loss of function. There is also debate as to the optimal management strategies for these challenging conditions. In the setting of advanced glenohumeral arthritis or arthropathy in the correct patient, arthroplasty provides consistent and reliable results. However, in younger patients or the patient without arthritis, arthroplasty may not be the best option. In some cases, addressing pain with biceps procedures, balloon spacer placement, débridement, or others may be appropriate. However, other instances may require attempts at improving shoulder kinematics with procedures such as rotator cuff repair, superior capsular reconstruction, and tendon transfer. In this review, we discuss current definitions for pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis, in addition to reviewing the indications for the various treatment options and their respective outcomes.

Background: Several surgeons state that their best anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) outperforms their best reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) when performed for rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We identified the top-performing aTSAs and rTSAs at short-term follow-up and compared their clinical performance at midterm follow-up to validate this common claim.

Methods: A retrospective review of a multicenter shoulder arthroplasty database was conducted. All shoulders undergoing primary aTSA or rTSA for rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis between 2007 and 2020 were reviewed. Shoulders with a follow-up clinical visit between 2 and 3 years and a clinical follow-up of minimum 5 years were included. Two separate cohorts were identified: patients with a top 20% (1) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and (2) Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart (SAS) score at 2 to 3 years of follow-up. Clinical outcomes including range of motion, outcome scores, and rates of complications and revision surgeries were compared at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Results: The ASES score cohort comprised 185 aTSAs (mean age 67 years, 42% female) and 49 rTSAs (mean age 72 years, 45% female). The SAS score cohort comprised 145 aTSAs (mean age 67 years, 59% female) and 42 rTSAs (mean age 71 years, 57% female). Active external rotation (ER) was greater after aTSA at midterm follow-up in both ASES and SAS score cohorts; however, preoperative to postoperative improvement was equivalent. Postoperative ER and SAS scores were greater after aTSA in both cohorts ( P < 0.05); however, no other significant differences in any preoperative or postoperative clinical outcomes were present ( P > 0.05), and patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at similar rates for all outcomes. No difference was found in the incidence of complications and revision surgeries between top-performing aTSAs and rTSAs.

Conclusion: Among top-performing shoulder arthroplasties at early follow-up, aTSA does not appear to outperform rTSA, except superior ER at midterm follow-up.

Level of evidence: Retrospective comparative cohort study, Level Ⅲ.

Musculoskeletal injuries are a complex multifactorial phenomenon, and several factors can contribute to their occurrence. This review aimed to discuss some relevant and often unexpected elements involved in musculoskeletal injuries and rehabilitation. One of the main factors discussed is the role of physiological adaptation to training in musculoskeletal injury susceptibility. This is probably the most modifiable factor in preventing and treating musculoskeletal injuries. Other factors discussed are the role of genetics in injury susceptibility; the effect of stressors and environmental factors and the way we deal with setbacks; anabolic steroid use as aesthetic and performance-enhancement drugs; nutrition, sleeping, and the imbalance between rest, energy intake, and training; anatomic and biomechanical factors; and the role of systemic disease. Moreover, the topic of unknown factors keeps an open door for future discoveries. This review highlights the importance of understanding the various factors contributing to musculoskeletal injuries and the need for an individualized approach to injury prevention and rehabilitation, from both a historical and a physiological point of view.

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) visits because of pediatric fractures are not only burdensome for patients and their families but also result in an increased healthcare expenditure. Almost half of all children experience at least one fracture by the age of 15. Many fractures occur in playgrounds, with monkey bars and other climbing apparatuses noted as frequent mechanisms of injury. Our purpose was to identify the pattern of injury and the population sustaining monkey bar-associated fractures.

Methods: We queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database for all monkey bar-associated injuries in patients aged 0 to 18 years from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. We described demographic data, patient disposition from the ED, fracture pattern, and injury setting using unweighted and weighted estimates. Weighted results that more closely reflect national estimates were calculated.

Results: During the study period, 30,920 (862,595 weighted) monkey bar-associated injuries presented to EDs; 16,410 (53.1%) (weighted injuries: 408,722 [47.4%]) were fracture injuries. The average age of kids sustaining fractures was 6.5 years, with most injuries (66.4%) occurring in kids between 6 and 12 years. A higher percentage of male patients presented to the ED with fractures compared with female patients (53% versus 47%). Upper extremity fractures were most common, 382,672 (94%) with forearm fractures constituting the majority (156,691 [38%]). Most children were treated and released (354,323 [87%]), with only 35,227 children (9%) being admitted for treatment. Places of recreation/sports were the most common setting of fractures (148,039 [36%]), followed by schools (159,784 [39%]). A notable association was observed between year and ethnicity and between month period and injury setting.

Conclusion: Monkey bar-associated injuries are a major cause of upper extremity fractures in children, with most injuries occurring in recreational areas or schools. Young elementary school children are at the highest risk of injury. ED visits because of monkey bar-associated fractures have increased over the study period, and these injuries continue to be a major cause of fractures in children. Additional measures should be installed to decrease these preventable fractures among children, with schools as a potential starting point.

Introduction: Delay in surgical management for orthopaedic emergencies and severe fracture types can result in notable morbidity and even mortality for patients. Disparities in various facets of orthopaedic care have been identified based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and payer status, but disparities in time to surgery have been poorly explored. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to investigate whether disparities exist in time to emergent orthopaedic surgery.

Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, septic knee, septic hip, or cauda equina syndrome over 2012 to 2020 were identified using national data. Multivariable linear regression models were constructed, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, payer status, socioeconomic status, hospital setting, and comorbidities to examine the effect of payer status and race/ethnicity, on time to surgery.

Results: Over 2012 to 2020, 247,370 patients underwent surgery for hip fracture, 64,827 for femur fracture, 14,130 for pelvic fracture, 14,979 for septic knee, 3,205 for septic hip, and 4,730 for cauda equina syndrome. On multivariable analysis, patients with Medicaid experienced significantly longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, septic knee, and cauda equina syndrome ( P < 0.05 all). Black patients experienced longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, septic knee, septic hip, and cauda equina syndrome, and Hispanic patients experienced longer time to surgery for hip fracture, femur fracture, pelvic fracture, and cauda equina syndrome ( P < 0.05 all).

Discussion: The results of this study demonstrate that Medicaid-insured patients, and often minority patients, experience longer delays to surgery than privately insured and White patients. Future work should endeavor to identify causes of these disparities to promote creation of policies aimed at improving timely access to care for Medicaid-insured and minority patients.

Level of evidence: III.

Purpose: Physician and surgeon involvement in industry has received considerable attention in recent decades. In this study, we outline the perspective of the general US population regarding (1) disclosure, (2) ownership, and (3) compensation between physicians/surgeons and industry. We hypothesize that the general population would be largely supportive of the physician/surgeon-industry relationship.

Methods: An online, survey-based, descriptive study was conducted through a crowdsourcing platform, Amazon Mechanical Turk. Survey respondents were presented with a seven-item questionnaire inquiring about the physician/surgeon and industry relationship. An "attention check" question was included; those who failed this question were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the data and a McNemar chi-squared test for paired, dichotomous data.

Results: A total of 993 respondents were included. Survey responses are summarized in Table 1. 70.6% of respondents stated that it was "important" or "extremely important" to disclose that the patient be informed whether implants used in surgery had been developed by the operating surgeon. 71.1% of respondents reported that it was "important" or "extremely important" to disclose partial ownership within industry. Seventy-one percent of respondents stated it was "important" or "extremely important" to disclose royalty payments pertaining to surgical implants. 95.6% of respondents suggested that it was acceptable for surgeons to accept free airfare and lodging, and 95.2% of respondents stated that it was acceptable for the surgeon to be compensated for time away from practice to learn about new equipment.

Discussion: In our survey of 993 respondents, we found that relationships with industry are considered acceptable if appropriate disclosure is given to patients. We also found that although respondents suggested that physicians and surgeons may be influenced by a free meal, compensation for trips to try new equipment and time spent away from practice is considered appropriate.

Level of evidence: 2c, Ecological studies.

Scaphoid nonunions are a complex challenge that are frequently encountered by hand surgeons. Because of the tenuous blood supply of the scaphoid and secondary deformities that occur as a result of delayed or unsuccessful treatment, the treatment of scaphoid nonunions frequently requires the use of internal fixation and supplemental bone graft. There are multiple bone graft sources and techniques that can be employed based on the patient, the viability of the proximal pole fragment, and the presence of a deformity. Without osteonecrosis or disruption of the scaphoid blood supply, nonvascularized autologous grafts can be used from the distal radius, proximal ulna, or iliac crest. In cases where there is concern for an insufficient blood supply, vascularized bone graft sources can be employed, including pedicled local grafts and free flap grafts. When there is a nonviable and fragmented proximal pole, using osteochondral autografts has become increasingly used to reconstruct the scaphoid. Bone graft substitutes can additionally be used to supplement the fixation construct. This review focuses on the indications and role of bone grafts in scaphoid nonunions to help augment internal fixation, promote healing, and restore carpal alignment.

Introduction: Dexamethasone is used extensively during total hip and knee arthroplasty total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to control pain and decrease the risk of nausea and vomiting. However, the safety of dexamethasone utilization in diabetic patients is poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate complications associated with perioperative dexamethasone administration during primary TJA in diabetic patients.

Methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for all patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent primary elective TJA from 2015 to 2020. Patients who received intravenous dexamethasone on the day of surgery were compared with those who did not. Patient characteristics, hospital factors, and rates of medical comorbidities were assessed and compared between the cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression was done to assess the 90-day risk of infectious and noninfectious postoperative complications.

Results: Overall, 261,474 diabetic patients were included for analysis, 122,631 (46.9%) of whom received dexamethasone. The two cohorts were similar in patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and comorbidity burden (absolute range of differences: 0.00 to 2.33%). Diabetic patients who received dexamethasone had decreased odds of periprosthetic joint infection (adjusted odds ratio 0.82, 95%-CI: 0.75 to 0.90, P < 0.001) and sepsis (aOR: 0.80, 95%-CI: 0.72 to 0.89, P < 0.001) compared with those who did not. Patients who received dexamethasone had shorter length of stay compared with those who did not (1.87 ± 1.60 days vs. 2.27 ± 1.88 days, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds of postoperative hyperglycemia were markedly higher in the dexamethasone group (aOR: 1.14, 95%-CI: 1.10 to 1.18, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Use of perioperative dexamethasone was not associated with the increased risk of infectious complications among diabetic patients undergoing TJA, supporting its safety in this high-risk population.