Surgical Oncology-Oxford最新文献

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently been introduced into the treatment algorithm of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the cost effectiveness of ICIs compared with pre-existing therapies for HCC has not been assessed. We performed a meta-analysis to understand the incremental cost effectiveness of ICIs compared with sorafenib.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched (2000–2022). The incremental cost, incremental effectiveness, incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ICI compared with sorafenib and willingness to pay (WTP) were extracted from each study. The variables were used to derive the incremental net benefit (INB). Random-effect meta-analysis was then conducted to derive the pooled INB of ICI compared with sorafenib.

Results

Five studies (3265 patients, 82.1 % male) met inclusion criteria. All studies assessed the cost effectiveness of ICIs compared with sorafenib. Studies used Quality adjusted life years to assess incremental effectiveness and reported ICER values ranging from $21,000 to $221,000 for ICIs and sorafenib. Four out of five studies reported that ICI had a higher ICER compared with sorafenib at WTP $150,000. The overall pooled INB was US$-42,000 (95 % CIUS$-96,000, US$11,528) suggesting that ICI was not cost effective compared with sorafenib.

Conclusion

When compared with sorafenib, ICIs were not a cost-effective option for systemic therapy for patients with HCC. More work focusing on cost effective options for patients with HCC is warranted.

The study aims to compare histopathological margins after resection of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with different surgical techniques: conventional sharp resection (SR) with scalpel versus monopolar electrocautery (ME). Hence, the question arises whether thermal damage by performing monopolar electrocautery surgery will lead to close margins more frequently than by using scalpels. 152 patients were included in this study. All patients received a primary tumor resection either performed with SR or with ME. Surgical margins were distributed into two groups: ≥5 mm (clear margins) and < 5 mm (close or involved margins). For comparing homogeneous groups, we considered tumor localizations, diameter and depth of invasion. The results were statistically analyzed by applying the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-U-Test. The distribution of tumor diameter and depth of invasion was equal in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the amount of free surgical margins using SR or ME (p = 0.884). According to this study, the use of the monopolar electrocautery for tumor resection in the oral cavity does not increase the rate of compromised resection margins compared to the conventional scalpel.

Introduction

Gastric remnant cancer (GRC) has been defined as a distinct clinical entity and is reported to account for 1–8% of all gastric cancers. We aimed to characterize GRC patients and assess survival in a Western population.

Methods

Retrospective population-based cohort study including 1217 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma in Central Norway 2001–2016. GRCs (n = 78) defined as adenocarcinomas arising in the residual stomach after distal gastrectomy were compared to non-GRC (n = 1139) and to proximal non-GRC (n = 595).

Results

78 (6.4 %) gastric cancers were GRC. The annual number and proportion of GRC declined during the study period (p = 0.003). Median latency from distal gastrectomy to GRC diagnosis was 37.6 years (15.7–68.0) and previous Billroth II reconstruction was most common (87.7%). Compared to controls, GRC patients were more frequently males (83.3%), diagnosed in earlier TNM stages and were older at diagnosis. A smaller proportion of GRC patients received perioperative or palliative chemotherapy, but the R0/R1resection rate of 41.0% was no different from non-GRC patients. Overall median survival for GRC patients irrespective of treatment was 7.0 months, which did not differ from non-GRCs or proximal non-GRC. In multivariate analyses TNM stage and age were independently associated with mortality, whereas GRC per se was not.

Conclusions

Numbers of GRCs declined during the study period, but the latency between distal gastrectomy and GRC diagnosis was long. GRC patients were more frequently male and older than other gastric cancer patients. GRC was not independently associated with survival after adjusting for TNM stage and tumor location.

In the 21st century, the development of medical science has entered the era of big data, and machine learning has become an essential tool for mining medical big data. The establishment of the SEER database has provided a wealth of epidemiological data for cancer clinical research, and the number of studies based on SEER and machine learning has been growing in recent years. This article reviews recent research based on SEER and machine learning and finds that the current focus of such studies is primarily on the development and validation of models using machine learning algorithms, with the main directions being lymph node metastasis prediction, distant metastasis prediction, and prognosis-related research. Compared to traditional models, machine learning algorithms have the advantage of stronger adaptability, but also suffer from disadvantages such as overfitting and poor interpretability, which need to be weighed in practical applications. At present, machine learning algorithms, as the foundation of artificial intelligence, have just begun to emerge in the field of cancer clinical research. The future development of oncology will enter a more precise era of cancer research, characterized by larger data, higher dimensions, and more frequent information exchange. Machine learning is bound to shine brightly in this field.

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging disease, with surgery being the only possible cure. However, despite surgery, the majority of patients experience recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that perioperative KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have prognostic value. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic significance of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing in resected PDAC.

Methods

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies that reported the effect of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA on overall survival (OS) and/or relapse-free survival (RFS) in resected PDAC. We used a random-effects model to determine the pooled OS and RFS hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

Results

We identified 15 studies (868 patients) eligible for analysis. In the preoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS in 8 studies (HR, 2.067; 95 % CI, 1.346–3.174, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 10 studies (HR, 2.170; 95 % CI, 1.451–3.245, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA. In the postoperative setting, positive ctDNA correlated with worse RFS across 9 studies (HR, 3.32; 95 % CI, 2.19–5.03, P < 0.001) and worse OS in 6 studies (HR, 6.62; 95 % CI, 2.18–20.16, P < 0.001) compared to negative ctDNA.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis supports the utility of preoperative and postoperative KRAS-mutated ctDNA testing as a prognostic marker for resected PDAC. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm these results and to investigate the potential therapeutic implications of positive KRAS-mutated ctDNA.

Purpose

Although proximal gastrectomy (PG) is commonly used in patients with upper gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, long-term prognostic factors in these patients are poorly understood. The double-flap technique (DFT) is an esophagogastrostomy with anti-reflux mechanism after PG; we previously conducted a multicenter retrospective study (rD-FLAP) to evaluate the short-term outcomes of DFT reconstruction. Here, we evaluated the long-term prognostic factors in patients with upper GC and EGJ cancer.

Methods

The study was conducted as a secondary analysis of the rD-FLAP Study, which enrolled patients who underwent PG with DFT reconstruction, irrespective of disease type, between January 1996 and December 2015.

Results

A total of 509 GC and EGJ cancer patients were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival demonstrated that a preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) < 45 (p < 0.001, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.59, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.93–6.67) was an independent poor prognostic factor alongside pathological T factor ([pT] ≥2) (p = 0.010, HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.22–4.30) and pathological N factor ([pN] ≥1) (p = 0.001, HR: 3.27, 95% CI: 1.66–6.46). In patients with preoperative PNI ≥45, PNI change (<90%) at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.019, HR: 2.54, 95%CI: 1.16–5.54) was an independent poor prognostic factor, for which operation time (≥300 min) and blood loss (≥200 mL) were independent risk factors. No independent prognostic factors were identified in patients with preoperative PNI <45.

Conclusions

PNI is a prognostic factor in upper GC and EGJ cancer patients. Preoperative nutritional enhancement and postoperative nutritional maintenance are important for prognostic improvement in these patients.

Introduction

Minimally invasive (MI) surgery has been widely adopted to treat left-sided pancreatic cancer. However, outcomes are not clearly defined.

Materials

Retrospective cohort study utilizing NCDB and NSQIP data.

Results

Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2016 were included (n = 7347). Utilizing NSQIP (n = 2406), patients were divided into two groups: intention-to-treat (ITT) MI (including MI converted to open, n = 929) and open (n = 1477). Patients undergoing open pancreatectomy were more likely to have longer length of stay (6 vs. 5 days, p=<0.001). On multivariate analysis, open procedures were not associated with mortality (OR 1.24; CI 0.51–3.30, p = 0.64), serious complications (OR 1.03; CI 0.90–1.37, p = 0.79), and any complications (OR 1.07; CI 0.86–1.32, p = 0.56). NCDB patients (n = 4941) were also divided into two groups, ITT MI (n = 1,769, 36%) and open group (n = 3,172, 64%). The median survival was lower in open procedure patients, 23 vs. 27.1 months (p < 0.001). This finding was maintained on multivariable analysis (HR 1.16; CI 1.03–1.32, p = 0.017).

Conclusion

Based on these data, MI distal pancreatectomy could be considered a standard of care for pancreatic cancer when technically feasible. Although morbidity and mortality were similar, the laparoscopic approach had a shorter length of stay and could hasten recovery.

Background

This study examined the associations of socioeconomic status (SES), race/ethnicity, surgery type, and treatment delays with mortality among colon cancer patients. In addition, the study also quantifies the extent to which clinical and SES factors’ variations explain the racial/ethnic differences in overall survival.

Patients and methods

We studied 111,789 adult patients ≥45 years old who were diagnosed with colon cancer between 2010 and 2017, identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We performed logistic regression models to examine the association of SES and race/ethnicity with surgery type and first course of treatment delays. We also performed mediation analysis to quantify the extent to which treatment, sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors mediated racial/ethnic differences in survival.

Results

Non-Hispanic (NH) Blacks [adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.19, 95% CI:1.13–1.25] were significantly more likely to undergo subtotal colectomy and to experience treatment delays [aOR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.31–1.48] compared to NH Whites. Hispanics [aOR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.49–1.69] were more likely to experience treatment delays than NH Whites. Delayed first course of treatment explained 23.56% and 56.73% of the lower survival among NH Blacks and Hispanics, respectively, compared to their NH White counterparts.

Conclusions

Race/ethnicity is significantly associated with the surgery type performed and the first course of treatment delays. Variations in treatment, SES, and clinicopathological factors significantly explained racial disparities in overall mortality. These disparities highlight the need for multidisciplinary interventions to address the treatment and social factors perpetuating racial disparities in colon cancer mortality.

Background

The eyelids are a small anatomical structure, yet they contain several histological layers from which benign and malignant tumors can originate. Compared to other parts of the face, the eyelids are often the first place where neoplasms or disease changes are noticed.

Aim

To analyze localization and its predictive malignancy of eyelid tumors over a 10-year period.

Method

A retrospective study of 436 (450 eyes) patients operated on over a 10-year period. Descriptive, dispersion and correlation analyzes were performed.

Results

The results provide a clear assessment of the distribution and incidence of eyelid tumors according to the localization of the defect, involvement of the lash line, inflammatory response, etc. Tumor distribution is significantly skewed in favor of the medial canthus, 80% to 20% by all tumors. The involvement of the lid margin occurs in 83% of malignant tumors and has significant predictive value.

Conclusion

The lower eyelid and the medial canthus are preferred locations for malignant tumors, and the upper eyelid for benign ones. Our study does not affect the types of surgical techniques; its purpose is to show the expected malignancy of the different combinations by location. The location of the tumor is a leading factor in the choice of the oculoplastic reconstructive procedure.

Introduction

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the standard pretreatment staging in patients with rectal cancer. Accurate tumor staging is paramount to determining the appropriate treatment course for patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. The current study aims to re-evaluate the accuracy of pre-operative MRI in staging of both early and locally advanced rectal cancer following completion of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) compared to the pathologic stage.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients treated for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2020 at a single academic institution. All patients underwent rectal cancer protocol MRIs before surgical resection. Analysis was carried out in two groups: early rectal cancer: T1/2 N0 tumors with upfront surgical resection (N = 40); and locally advanced disease: T3 or greater or N+ disease receiving NAT, with restaging MRI following NAT (n = 63).

Results

103 patients were included in analysis. MRI accuracy in early tumors was 35% ICC = 0.52 (95% CI 0.25–0.71) T stage and 66% ICC = 0 (95% CI -0.24, 0.29) for 29 patients with nodal data for N stage. There was 28% understaging of T2 tumors and 34% understaging of N0 stage by MRI. Post NAT MRI had 44% accuracy ICC = 0.57 (95% CI -0.15-0.20) T stage and 60% accuracy ICC = 0.32 (95% CI 0.08–0.52) N stage. Tumor invasion was overstaged on MRI: 40% T2, 29% T3, 90% T4. Nodal inaccuracy was due to overstaging, 61% N1, 90% N2.

Conclusions

In locally advanced rectal cancer MRI overstaged tumors, this could be due to the continued effect of NAT from MRI to resection. This overstaging is of little clinical significance as it doesn't alter the treatment plan, except in cases of complete clinical response. In early rectal cancer, MRI had limited accuracy compared to pathology, understaging a quarter of patients who would benefit from NAT before surgery. Other adjunct imaging modalities should be considered to improve accuracy in staging early rectal cancer and consideration of complete response and enrollment in watch and wait protocols.