Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a highly lethal hepatobiliary cancer. Radical resection offers the best chance for extended survival, but the efficacy of left-sided hepatectomy (LH) versus right-sided hepatectomy (RH) remains controversial.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies comparing LH and RH in patients with resectable pCCA was conducted. Subanalyses were performed based on year of publication, region, number of cases and Bismuth classification (BC) ≥ III.
Results
Nineteen studies involving 3838 patients were included, with 1779 (46 %) undergoing LH and 2059 (54 %) undergoing RH. LH was associated with increased overall survival (OS) in subgroup analysis of studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) (logHR 0.59; p = 0.04). LH showed higher rates of arterial resection (14 % vs. 1 %), transfusion (51 % vs. 41 %), operation time (MD 31.44 min), and bile leakage (21 % vs. 18 %), but lower rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure (9 % vs. 21 %) and 90-day mortality (8 % vs 16 %). Three-year disease-free survival rates increased in Western centers but decreased in Eastern centers.
Conclusion
LH is linked to higher OS in this analysis but is a more demanding technique. Resection side decision should consider several factors, including future liver remnant, tumor location, vascular involvement, and surgical expertise.
背景:肝周胆管癌(pCCA)是一种致死率极高的肝胆癌。根治性切除术为延长生存期提供了最佳机会,但左侧肝切除术(LH)与右侧肝切除术(RH)的疗效仍存在争议:方法: 对可切除的 pCCA 患者进行 LH 和 RH 比较的非随机队列研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。根据发表年份、地区、病例数和铋分类(BC)≥ III 进行了子分析:共纳入19项研究,涉及3838名患者,其中1779人(46%)接受了LH手术,2059人(54%)接受了RH手术。在对报告危险比(HR)的研究进行的亚组分析中,LH与总生存率(OS)的提高有关(logHR 0.59; p = 0.04)。LH的动脉切除率(14% vs. 1%)、输血率(51% vs. 41%)、手术时间(MD 31.44分钟)和胆汁渗漏率(21% vs. 18%)较高,但肝切除术后肝功能衰竭率(9% vs. 21%)和90天死亡率(8% vs. 16%)较低。西方中心的三年无病生存率上升,而东方中心的三年无病生存率下降:结论:在这项分析中,LH与较高的OS有关,但这是一项要求较高的技术。切除侧的决定应考虑多个因素,包括未来的肝脏残余、肿瘤位置、血管受累情况和手术专长。
{"title":"Prognostic impact of liver resection side in peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Cecilio Armengol-García , Valeria Blandin-Alvarez , David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez , Eduardo Flores-Villalba","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102113","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102113","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a highly lethal hepatobiliary cancer. Radical resection offers the best chance for extended survival, but the efficacy of left-sided hepatectomy (LH) versus right-sided hepatectomy (RH) remains controversial.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies comparing LH and RH in patients with resectable pCCA was conducted. Subanalyses were performed based on year of publication, region, number of cases and Bismuth classification (BC) ≥ III.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen studies involving 3838 patients were included, with 1779 (46 %) undergoing LH and 2059 (54 %) undergoing RH. LH was associated with increased overall survival (OS) in subgroup analysis of studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) (logHR 0.59; p = 0.04). LH showed higher rates of arterial resection (14 % vs. 1 %), transfusion (51 % vs. 41 %), operation time (MD 31.44 min), and bile leakage (21 % vs. 18 %), but lower rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure (9 % vs. 21 %) and 90-day mortality (8 % vs 16 %). Three-year disease-free survival rates increased in Western centers but decreased in Eastern centers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>LH is linked to higher OS in this analysis but is a more demanding technique. Resection side decision should consider several factors, including future liver remnant, tumor location, vascular involvement, and surgical expertise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 102113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102117
Tomasz Ostrowski , Jakub Litwiński , Katarzyna Gęca , Izabela Świetlicka , Wojciech P. Polkowski , Magdalena Skórzewska
The prevention of intraperitoneal spread is of utmost importance in the management of advanced ovarian cancer (OC), thus demanding the exploration of innovative treatment techniques. The propensity of OC to spread to the peritoneum has highlighted the potential of local therapy as a promising approach. Among the proposed treatments thus far are several local intraperitoneal therapies, with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) being one of them. The application of HIPEC may potentially enhance the survival rates of patients with OC, as indicated by a recent publication of high-quality prospective data. The incorporation of HIPEC in conjunction with primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) does not have a significant impact on either overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). However, the incorporation of HIPEC alongside interval CRS, followed by systemic chemotherapy (CTH), markedly enhances both OS and DFS. The most recent data also substantiates the effectiveness of HIPEC in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), resulting in an improvement of survival outcomes.
Additional research will contribute to the improvement of the HIPEC regimen and technique, as well as the precise identification of patients who will gain the most advantage from this treatment approach. It is recommended to discuss and update (inter)national clinical guidelines for managing patients with advanced OC and peritoneal involvement.
{"title":"A Clinician's perspective on the role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer management","authors":"Tomasz Ostrowski , Jakub Litwiński , Katarzyna Gęca , Izabela Świetlicka , Wojciech P. Polkowski , Magdalena Skórzewska","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102117","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102117","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prevention of intraperitoneal spread is of utmost importance in the management of advanced ovarian cancer (OC), thus demanding the exploration of innovative treatment techniques. The propensity of OC to spread to the peritoneum has highlighted the potential of local therapy as a promising approach. Among the proposed treatments thus far are several local intraperitoneal therapies, with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) being one of them. The application of HIPEC may potentially enhance the survival rates of patients with OC, as indicated by a recent publication of high-quality prospective data. The incorporation of HIPEC in conjunction with primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) does not have a significant impact on either overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). However, the incorporation of HIPEC alongside interval CRS, followed by systemic chemotherapy (CTH), markedly enhances both OS and DFS. The most recent data also substantiates the effectiveness of HIPEC in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), resulting in an improvement of survival outcomes.</p><p>Additional research will contribute to the improvement of the HIPEC regimen and technique, as well as the precise identification of patients who will gain the most advantage from this treatment approach. It is recommended to discuss and update (inter)national clinical guidelines for managing patients with advanced OC and peritoneal involvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 102117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000859/pdfft?md5=c3a8c718465ce15cbb69222524372bd7&pid=1-s2.0-S0960740424000859-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-10DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102101
Fabrice Scheurer , Dominik Kaiser , Adrian Kobe , Maria Smolle , Daniel Suter , José Miguel Spirig , Daniel Müller
Introduction
Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are aggressive neoplasms, with rare occurrences in the posterior pelvis and sacral area. Surgical challenges in this region include the inability to apply a tourniquet and limited cementation post-curettage due to proximity to neurovascular structures, leading to potential complications. This case-control study explores the impact of preoperative embolization on GCTB located in the iliosacral region.
Methods
Five surgeries (January–December 2021) for pelvic GCTB (3 sacrum, 2 posterior ilium) were performed on four patients. Diagnosis was confirmed through preoperative CT-guided biopsies. One surgery involved curettage with PMMA cement filling, while four surgeries had curettage without cavity filling. Preoperative embolization of the tumor feeding vessel occurred approximately 16 h before surgery in two cases. Denosumab treatment was not administered.
Results
Tumor volume, assessed by preoperative MRI, was comparable between patients with and without preoperative embolization (p = .14). Surgeries without embolization had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 3250 ml, erythrocyte transfusion volume of 1125 ml, and a mean surgical time of 114.5 min for two surgeries. Surgeries with preoperative embolization showed a mean intraoperative blood loss of 1850 ml, no erythrocyte transfusion requirement, and a mean surgical time of 68 min.
Conclusion
Curettage of GCTB in the posterior pelvis and sacrum presents challenges, with significant intraoperative blood loss impacting surgical time and transfusion needs. Preoperative embolization may be beneficial in reducing blood loss during surgery in these cases.
{"title":"The effect of preoperative embolization on giant cell tumors of the bone localized in the iliosacral region of the pelvis","authors":"Fabrice Scheurer , Dominik Kaiser , Adrian Kobe , Maria Smolle , Daniel Suter , José Miguel Spirig , Daniel Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102101","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102101","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are aggressive neoplasms, with rare occurrences in the posterior pelvis and sacral area. Surgical challenges in this region include the inability to apply a tourniquet and limited cementation post-curettage due to proximity to neurovascular structures, leading to potential complications. This case-control study explores the impact of preoperative embolization on GCTB located in the iliosacral region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five surgeries (January–December 2021) for pelvic GCTB (3 sacrum, 2 posterior ilium) were performed on four patients. Diagnosis was confirmed through preoperative CT-guided biopsies. One surgery involved curettage with PMMA cement filling, while four surgeries had curettage without cavity filling. Preoperative embolization of the tumor feeding vessel occurred approximately 16 h before surgery in two cases. Denosumab treatment was not administered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Tumor volume, assessed by preoperative MRI, was comparable between patients with and without preoperative embolization (p = .14). Surgeries without embolization had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 3250 ml, erythrocyte transfusion volume of 1125 ml, and a mean surgical time of 114.5 min for two surgeries. Surgeries with preoperative embolization showed a mean intraoperative blood loss of 1850 ml, no erythrocyte transfusion requirement, and a mean surgical time of 68 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Curettage of GCTB in the posterior pelvis and sacrum presents challenges, with significant intraoperative blood loss impacting surgical time and transfusion needs. Preoperative embolization may be beneficial in reducing blood loss during surgery in these cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 102101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000690/pdfft?md5=ef4720dd51130119a9d763ea2917190c&pid=1-s2.0-S0960740424000690-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141630349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although tumor recurrence after surgical resection in pancreatic cancer (PC) is generally considered incurable, it is well-accepted that clinical presentations and outcomes vary according to the recurrent sites (e.g., liver vs. lung recurrence), suggesting a possible biological inhomogeneity of PC recurrence. Understanding the behavior of biological factors, specifically tumor markers (TMs), at different recurrence sites may contribute to individualized treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the dynamics of pre-recurrence TMs at liver and lung recurrence sites.
Methods
Patients with isolated postoperative liver or lung recurrence as their first recurrence were enrolled. Starting from the recurrence date confirmed by imaging examinations, the values of TMs (carbohydrate antigen 19-9: CA19-9; carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were retrospectively evaluated 6 and 3 months before recurrence and at the time of recurrence.
Results
Patients with liver recurrence displayed a significant increase in CA19-9 and CEA levels from as early as 6 months before recurrence. Contrastingly, patients with lung recurrence demonstrated a significant elevation of CA19-9 levels starting from 3 months before recurrence, with no increase in CEA levels, even at the time of recurrence. The relative change in CA19-9 and CEA levels during each period were significantly lower in patients with lung recurrence.
Conclusions
Both TMs exhibited organ-specific variations in patients with postoperative PC recurrence. This disparity may reflect the biological heterogeneity of PC between recurrence patterns, thereby highlighting the importance of conducting postoperative follow-up with consideration of this fact.
背景/目的:尽管胰腺癌(PC)手术切除后肿瘤复发通常被认为是不可治愈的,但公认的是,不同复发部位(如肝复发与肺复发)的临床表现和预后各不相同,这表明 PC 复发可能存在生物学不均一性。了解不同复发部位的生物因素,特别是肿瘤标志物(TMs)的行为可能有助于制定个体化治疗策略。因此,本研究旨在比较肝脏和肺部复发部位复发前TMs的动态变化:方法:将术后肝脏或肺部孤立复发作为首次复发的患者纳入研究。从影像学检查确认的复发日期开始,回顾性评估复发前 6 个月和 3 个月以及复发时的 TMs(碳水化合物抗原 19-9:CA19-9;癌胚抗原:CEA)值:结果:肝癌复发患者的 CA19-9 和 CEA 水平早在复发前 6 个月就显著升高。相反,肺部复发患者的 CA19-9 水平从复发前 3 个月开始显著升高,而 CEA 水平即使在复发时也没有升高。肺部复发患者在每个时期的CA19-9和CEA水平相对变化明显较低:结论:PC 术后复发患者的两种 TM 均表现出器官特异性变化。结论:PC 术后复发患者的两种 TM 均表现出器官特异性差异,这种差异可能反映了不同复发模式下 PC 的生物学异质性,因此强调了术后随访的重要性。
{"title":"Organ-specific variations in tumor marker dynamics in postoperative pancreatic cancer recurrence: Trends in lung and liver recurrence highlighting biological heterogeneity","authors":"Satoru Miyahara, Hidenori Takahashi, Yoshito Tomimaru, Shogo Kobayashi, Kazuki Sasaki, Yoshifumi Iwagami, Daisaku Yamada, Hirofumi Akita, Takehiro Noda, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102103","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102103","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Objectives</h3><p>Although tumor recurrence after surgical resection in pancreatic cancer (PC) is generally considered incurable, it is well-accepted that clinical presentations and outcomes vary according to the recurrent sites (e.g., liver vs. lung recurrence), suggesting a possible biological inhomogeneity of PC recurrence. Understanding the behavior of biological factors, specifically tumor markers (TMs), at different recurrence sites may contribute to individualized treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the dynamics of pre-recurrence TMs at liver and lung recurrence sites.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with isolated postoperative liver or lung recurrence as their first recurrence were enrolled. Starting from the recurrence date confirmed by imaging examinations, the values of TMs (carbohydrate antigen 19-9: CA19-9; carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were retrospectively evaluated 6 and 3 months before recurrence and at the time of recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with liver recurrence displayed a significant increase in CA19-9 and CEA levels from as early as 6 months before recurrence. Contrastingly, patients with lung recurrence demonstrated a significant elevation of CA19-9 levels starting from 3 months before recurrence, with no increase in CEA levels, even at the time of recurrence. The relative change in CA19-9 and CEA levels during each period were significantly lower in patients with lung recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both TMs exhibited organ-specific variations in patients with postoperative PC recurrence. This disparity may reflect the biological heterogeneity of PC between recurrence patterns, thereby highlighting the importance of conducting postoperative follow-up with consideration of this fact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 102103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-03DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102102
Andrew M. Mendez , Elena N. Petre , Etay Ziv , Fourat Ridouani , Stephen B. Solomon , Vlasios Sotirchos , Ken Zhao , Erica S. Alexander
Objectives
Assess safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for adrenal metastases (AM) secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and methods
This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC AM treated with thermal ablation between 2/2010–11/2021. Local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.
Results
Seven patients (mean age ± SD, 63.9 ± 12.5 years; 6 males) with seven AM were treated in eight sessions. Retreatment was performed in one patient with residual disease. Five sessions were with microwave ablation and 3 with radiofrequency ablation. Mean tumor size was 20.1 ± 7.0 mm. Median number of ablation probes used was 1 (range, 1–5), with a median of 3 activations (range, 1–3), and average ablation time of 14.4 ± 15.0 minutes. Response based on RECIST v 1.1 or PERCIST criteria revealed stable disease in 1 tumor, progression of disease in 3 tumors (one was re-ablated), and partial response in 3 tumors. Median LTPFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]. Median OS was 47.97 months (95 % CI: 18.63- NR).
Intraprocedural hypertension (blood pressure ≥180 mmHg) occurred during 5/8 (62.5 %) sessions and intraoperative tachycardia occurred during 2/8 (25 %) sessions. Complications within one month of ablation occurred in 3/8 (37.5 %) sessions: grade 2 pneumothorax, grade 1 hematuria, and grade 2 adrenal insufficiency.
Conclusions
In this small series, thermal ablation for NSCLC AM resulted in prolonged local control and OS with no major complications.
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of adrenal metastases secondary to lung cancer","authors":"Andrew M. Mendez , Elena N. Petre , Etay Ziv , Fourat Ridouani , Stephen B. Solomon , Vlasios Sotirchos , Ken Zhao , Erica S. Alexander","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102102","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for adrenal metastases (AM) secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC AM treated with thermal ablation between 2/2010–11/2021. Local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven patients (mean age ± SD, 63.9 ± 12.5 years; 6 males) with seven AM were treated in eight sessions. Retreatment was performed in one patient with residual disease. Five sessions were with microwave ablation and 3 with radiofrequency ablation. Mean tumor size was 20.1 ± 7.0 mm. Median number of ablation probes used was 1 (range, 1–5), with a median of 3 activations (range, 1–3), and average ablation time of 14.4 ± 15.0 minutes. Response based on RECIST v 1.1 or PERCIST criteria revealed stable disease in 1 tumor, progression of disease in 3 tumors (one was re-ablated), and partial response in 3 tumors. Median LTPFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]. Median OS was 47.97 months (95 % CI: 18.63- NR).</p><p>Intraprocedural hypertension (blood pressure ≥180 mmHg) occurred during 5/8 (62.5 %) sessions and intraoperative tachycardia occurred during 2/8 (25 %) sessions. Complications within one month of ablation occurred in 3/8 (37.5 %) sessions: grade 2 pneumothorax, grade 1 hematuria, and grade 2 adrenal insufficiency.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this small series, thermal ablation for NSCLC AM resulted in prolonged local control and OS with no major complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 102102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141540007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-02DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102095
Zohar Goren , Tammy Zioni , Dina Lev , Yaron Cohen , Zvi Howard Perry
Background
The role of preoperative breast MRI to evaluate the extent of disease in breast cancer patients is considered controversial. We aimed at assessing the effect of breast MRI on the management of newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Materials
A retrospective review of 202 consecutively seen patients who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and who underwent preoperative breast MRIs at Assuta Ashdod between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2020. Data included discovering suspicious lesions by conventional imaging, MRI findings, and surgical pathology results. This was analyzed to determine whether the MRI changed the management and whether it had a justified or unjustified effect on the treatment.
Results
The mean age was 54.51 (standard deviation, 11.34 years). Breast MRI revealed additional findings in 56 % of patients and modified therapeutic management in 32 % of the cases evaluated, having a justified effect in 87.6 %. Patients with changed management had a statistically significantly higher mastectomy rate (36 %) than those who did not (14 %). No statistically significant association was found between independent variables such as breast density, tumor location on the breast, type of tumor, patient's demographic information, etc. And whether MRI findings changed the initial treatment plan.
Conclusions
MRI played an essential role in the preoperative staging of breast cancer in our study, modifying therapeutic planning in approximately one-third of the cases and having a justified effect on most of them. We, therefore, support preoperative breast MRI in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
{"title":"The impact of preoperative breast MRI on the therapeutic management of breast cancer patients","authors":"Zohar Goren , Tammy Zioni , Dina Lev , Yaron Cohen , Zvi Howard Perry","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102095","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102095","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The role of preoperative breast MRI to evaluate the extent of disease in breast cancer patients is considered controversial. We aimed at assessing the effect of breast MRI on the management of newly diagnosed breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Materials</h3><p>A retrospective review of 202 consecutively seen patients who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer and who underwent preoperative breast MRIs at Assuta Ashdod between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2020. Data included discovering suspicious lesions by conventional imaging, MRI findings, and surgical pathology results. This was analyzed to determine whether the MRI changed the management and whether it had a justified or unjustified effect on the treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age was 54.51 (standard deviation, 11.34 years). Breast MRI revealed additional findings in 56 % of patients and modified therapeutic management in 32 % of the cases evaluated, having a justified effect in 87.6 %. Patients with changed management had a statistically significantly higher mastectomy rate (36 %) than those who did not (14 %). No statistically significant association was found between independent variables such as breast density, tumor location on the breast, type of tumor, patient's demographic information, etc. And whether MRI findings changed the initial treatment plan.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MRI played an essential role in the preoperative staging of breast cancer in our study, modifying therapeutic planning in approximately one-third of the cases and having a justified effect on most of them. We, therefore, support preoperative breast <span>MRI</span> in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 102095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Several studies have indicated that BALAD score which includes the HCC tumor markers of HCC, AFP, AFP-L3%, DCP, and serum albumin and bilirubin value were good predictors of HCC patients for all treatment modalities. In this study, we aim to clarify the impact of BALAD score as the prognostic factor for HCC patients after curative surgery.
Methods
This study investigated 578 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between January 2003 and May 2013. Cumulative recurrence rate, overall survival (OS), and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed according to the level of BALAD score.
Results
In patients with higher BALAD score, recurrence rate and OS was poor (p = 0.0015 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed independent risk factors for recurrence to be male (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, P = 0.011), HCV-antibody positive (HR 1.33, P = 0.019), multiple tumors (HR 2.16, P < 0.0001), microvascular invasion (HR 1.45, P = 0.0035) and higher BALAD score (RR 1.70, P = 0.015). The independent risk factors for OS were multiple tumors (HR 1.52, P = 0.014), microvascular invasion (HR 1.53, P = 0.012), and higher BALAD score (RR 2.51, P = 0.0012).
Conclusion
BALAD score is associated with high recurrence rate and poor overall survival of the patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC.
{"title":"BALAD score predicts the recurrence and survival in the patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC","authors":"Shigeki Nakagawa, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Rumi Itoyama, Yuki Kitano, Kosuke Mima, Hirohisa Okabe, Hideo Baba","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102097","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102097","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Backgrounds</h3><p>Several studies have indicated that BALAD score which includes the HCC tumor markers of HCC, AFP, AFP-L3%, DCP, and serum albumin and bilirubin value were good predictors of HCC patients for all treatment modalities. In this study, we aim to clarify the impact of BALAD score as the prognostic factor for HCC patients after curative surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study investigated 578 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between January 2003 and May 2013. Cumulative recurrence rate, overall survival (OS), and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed according to the level of BALAD score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In patients with higher BALAD score, recurrence rate and OS was poor (p = 0.0015 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed independent risk factors for recurrence to be male (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, <em>P</em> = 0.011), HCV-antibody positive (HR 1.33, <em>P</em> = 0.019), multiple tumors (HR 2.16, <em>P</em> < 0.0001), microvascular invasion (HR 1.45, <em>P</em> = 0.0035) and higher BALAD score (RR 1.70, <em>P</em> = 0.015). The independent risk factors for OS were multiple tumors (HR 1.52, <em>P</em> = 0.014), microvascular invasion (HR 1.53, <em>P</em> = 0.012), and higher BALAD score (RR 2.51, <em>P</em> = 0.0012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BALAD score is associated with high recurrence rate and poor overall survival of the patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 102097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141636538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-29DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102096
Mahesh Goel , Gurudutt P. Varty , Shraddha Patkar , Meghana V. , Mufaddal Kazi , Kunal Nandy , Vikas Ostwal , Anant Ramaswamy , Kunal B. Gala , Nitin S. Shetty
Background
Intraoperative unresectability, postoperative deaths and early recurrences remain devastating futile events in the surgical management of Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) and Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (pCCA). The present study aims to determine the preoperative predictors of futile surgery in cholangiocarcinomas.
Methods
Consecutive hepatectomies for iCCA and pCCA, between September 2010 and June 2022 were included. Futility of surgery was defined as either intraoperative unresectability, postoperative 30-day mortality or recurrence within six months of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of futility.
Results
One hundred and fifty patients of iCCA and pCCA underwent surgery during the time period. Thirty-seven (38.1 %) out of 97 patients of iCCA and 25(47.16 %) out of 53 patients of pCCA underwent futile resection. The predictive factors of futile surgery for iCCA were tumour number (≥2) (OR, 9.705; 95%CI, 2.378–39.614; p = 0.002), serum aspartate transaminase (OR, 8.31; 95%CI, 2.796–24.703; p < 0.001) and serum CA-19.9 (>37 U/ml) (OR, 2.95; 95%CI, 1.051–8.283; p = 0.04). The predictive factors of futility for pCCA were lymph node involvement (OR, 7.636; 95%CI, 1.824–31.979; p = 0.005) and serum alkaline phosphatase (>562.5 U/L) (OR, 11.211; 95%CI, 1.752–71.750; p = 0.011).
Conclusion
Futile surgery was observed in over one third of our patients. Five strong preoperative predictors of futility were identified. Careful analysis of these factors may reduce futile surgical explorations.
{"title":"Preventing futile surgery in Intrahepatic and Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Can we identify preoperative factors to improve patient selection and optimize outcomes?","authors":"Mahesh Goel , Gurudutt P. Varty , Shraddha Patkar , Meghana V. , Mufaddal Kazi , Kunal Nandy , Vikas Ostwal , Anant Ramaswamy , Kunal B. Gala , Nitin S. Shetty","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102096","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102096","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intraoperative unresectability, postoperative deaths and early recurrences remain devastating futile events in the surgical management of Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) and Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (pCCA). The present study aims to determine the preoperative predictors of futile surgery in cholangiocarcinomas.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consecutive hepatectomies for iCCA and pCCA, between September 2010 and June 2022 were included. Futility of surgery was defined as either intraoperative unresectability, postoperative 30-day mortality or recurrence within six months of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of futility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and fifty patients of iCCA and pCCA underwent surgery during the time period. Thirty-seven (38.1 %) out of 97 patients of iCCA and 25(47.16 %) out of 53 patients of pCCA underwent futile resection. The predictive factors of futile surgery for iCCA were tumour number (≥2) (OR, 9.705; 95%CI, 2.378–39.614; p = 0.002), serum aspartate transaminase (OR, 8.31; 95%CI, 2.796–24.703; p < 0.001) and serum CA-19.9 (>37 U/ml) (OR, 2.95; 95%CI, 1.051–8.283; p = 0.04). The predictive factors of futility for pCCA were lymph node involvement (OR, 7.636; 95%CI, 1.824–31.979; p = 0.005) and serum alkaline phosphatase (>562.5 U/L) (OR, 11.211; 95%CI, 1.752–71.750; p = 0.011).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Futile surgery was observed in over one third of our patients. Five strong preoperative predictors of futility were identified. Careful analysis of these factors may reduce futile surgical explorations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 102096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141535931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-29DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102100
Justin Issard , Geoffrey Brioude , Delphine Mitilian , Dominique Fabre , Vincent Thomas de Montpreville , Amir Hanna , Caroline Caramella , Cécile Lepechoux , Benjamin Besse , Olaf Mercier , Elie Fadel
Objectives
Lower bilobectomy (LBL) leaves a residual pleural space potentially associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. In selected patients, right sleeve lower lobectomy (RSLL) with anastomosis between the middle lobe bronchus and intermediate bronchus is feasible. The outcomes of RSLL and LBL have not been compared. The aim of this study was to compare post-operative and long-term outcomes of RSLL and LBL in patients with lung cancer.
Methods
We retrospectively included patients managed by RSLL or LBL at our referral chest-surgery institution between 2001 and 2019. Post-operative complications and mortality were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare overall and disease-free survival rates.
Results
We identified 23 patients with RSLL and 96 with LBL. Postoperative mortality was 9 % after RSLL and 5 % after LBL (p = 0.41). Bronchial fistula developed in 3 (13 %) RSLL patients and 6 (6 %) LBL patients (p = 0.23). Pleural space complications were significantly less common after RSLL (4/23 [17 %] vs. 45/96 [47 %], p = 0.03). Long-term vital capacity was significantly higher in the RSLL group (91 % vs. 64 %, p < 0.01). Five-year survival did not differ significantly between groups (84 % vs. 72 %, p = 0.09).
Conclusions
RSLL was associated with similar postoperative mortality and long-term survival compared to LBL. However, pleural space complications were less common and lung function was better after RSLL than after LBL. When feasible, RSLL may deserve preference over LBL in patients with lung cancer managed at highly experienced centres.
{"title":"Outcomes of right sleeve lower lobectomy vs. lower bilobectomy for lung malignancies","authors":"Justin Issard , Geoffrey Brioude , Delphine Mitilian , Dominique Fabre , Vincent Thomas de Montpreville , Amir Hanna , Caroline Caramella , Cécile Lepechoux , Benjamin Besse , Olaf Mercier , Elie Fadel","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102100","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102100","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Lower bilobectomy (LBL) leaves a residual pleural space potentially associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. In selected patients, right sleeve lower lobectomy (RSLL) with anastomosis between the middle lobe bronchus and intermediate bronchus is feasible. The outcomes of RSLL and LBL have not been compared. The aim of this study was to compare post-operative and long-term outcomes of RSLL and LBL in patients with lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively included patients managed by RSLL or LBL at our referral chest-surgery institution between 2001 and 2019. Post-operative complications and mortality were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare overall and disease-free survival rates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 23 patients with RSLL and 96 with LBL. Postoperative mortality was 9 % after RSLL and 5 % after LBL (<em>p</em> = 0.41). Bronchial fistula developed in 3 (13 %) RSLL patients and 6 (6 %) LBL patients (<em>p</em> = 0.23). Pleural space complications were significantly less common after RSLL (4/23 [17 %] vs. 45/96 [47 %], <em>p</em> = 0.03). Long-term vital capacity was significantly higher in the RSLL group (91 % vs. 64 %, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Five-year survival did not differ significantly between groups (84 % vs. 72 %, <em>p</em> = 0.09).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>RSLL was associated with similar postoperative mortality and long-term survival compared to LBL. However, pleural space complications were less common and lung function was better after RSLL than after LBL. When feasible, RSLL may deserve preference over LBL in patients with lung cancer managed at highly experienced centres.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 102100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141638479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-28DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102098
Alicia López-Abad , Gerardo Server Gómez , Juan Pablo Loyola Maturana , Inés Giménez Andreu , Argimiro Collado Serra , Augusto Wong Gutiérrez , Juan Boronat Catalá , Pedro de Pablos Rodríguez , Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer , Juan Casanova Ramón-Borja , Miguel Ramírez Backhaus
Background
Minimally invasive techniques have demonstrated several advantages over the open approach. In the field of prostate cancer, the LAP-01 trial demonstrated the superiority of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) over laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) when comparing continence at 3-month after surgery, with no statistically significant differences at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.
Objectives
Externally validate the LAP-01 study and compare functional outcomes between the two minimally invasive approaches.
Material and methods
This retrospective study, conducted by a single surgeon (MRB), utilized data from a prospectively collected database, which included patients who underwent both RARP or LRP. Data regarding baseline characteristics, continence (assessed through the 24-h Pad test and ICIQ questionnaire) and potency were collected at multiple time points: 1 and 6 weeks after catheter removal, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery.
Results
The study encompasses 601 patients, 455 who underwent LRP and 146 RARP. The median age at diagnosis was 64 for LRP and 62 for RARP, while the median PSA levels at diagnosis were 6.7 ng/mL for LRP and 6.5 ng/mL for RARP. Bilateral nerve-sparing procedures were performed in 34.07 % of LRP cases and 51.37 % of RARP cases.
RARP exhibited a significant advantage over LRP both in continence and potency. Continence rates at 3-, 6- and 9-month after radical prostatectomy (RP) were 36.43 %, 61.86 % and 79.87 % for LRP, compared to 50.98 %, 69.87 % and 91.69 % for RARP. Potency rates at the same intervals were 0.90 %, 3.16 % and 6.39 % for LRP, and 6.19 %, 9.16 % and 18.96 % for RARP. These rates were more pronounced in patients with bilateral nerve-sparing.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrates that RARP results in significantly better continence recovery and superior potency outcomes throughout the entire follow-up period compared to LRP, even at the beginning of the robotic approach learning curve.
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of continence and potency after radical prostatectomy: Robotic vs. laparoscopic approaches, validating LAP-01 trial","authors":"Alicia López-Abad , Gerardo Server Gómez , Juan Pablo Loyola Maturana , Inés Giménez Andreu , Argimiro Collado Serra , Augusto Wong Gutiérrez , Juan Boronat Catalá , Pedro de Pablos Rodríguez , Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer , Juan Casanova Ramón-Borja , Miguel Ramírez Backhaus","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102098","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102098","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Minimally invasive techniques have demonstrated several advantages over the open approach. In the field of prostate cancer, the LAP-01 trial demonstrated the superiority of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) over laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) when comparing continence at 3-month after surgery, with no statistically significant differences at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Externally validate the LAP-01 study and compare functional outcomes between the two minimally invasive approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study, conducted by a single surgeon (MRB), utilized data from a prospectively collected database, which included patients who underwent both RARP or LRP. Data regarding baseline characteristics, continence (assessed through the 24-h Pad test and ICIQ questionnaire) and potency were collected at multiple time points: 1 and 6 weeks after catheter removal, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study encompasses 601 patients, 455 who underwent LRP and 146 RARP. The median age at diagnosis was 64 for LRP and 62 for RARP, while the median PSA levels at diagnosis were 6.7 ng/mL for LRP and 6.5 ng/mL for RARP. Bilateral nerve-sparing procedures were performed in 34.07 % of LRP cases and 51.37 % of RARP cases.</p><p>RARP exhibited a significant advantage over LRP both in continence and potency. Continence rates at 3-, 6- and 9-month after radical prostatectomy (RP) were 36.43 %, 61.86 % and 79.87 % for LRP, compared to 50.98 %, 69.87 % and 91.69 % for RARP. Potency rates at the same intervals were 0.90 %, 3.16 % and 6.39 % for LRP, and 6.19 %, 9.16 % and 18.96 % for RARP. These rates were more pronounced in patients with bilateral nerve-sparing.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study demonstrates that RARP results in significantly better continence recovery and superior potency outcomes throughout the entire follow-up period compared to LRP, even at the beginning of the robotic approach learning curve.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 102098"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141592043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}