首页 > 最新文献

Disease Management : Dm最新文献

英文 中文
Cardiovascular late effects and the ongoing care of adult cancer survivors. 心血管晚期效应和成年癌症幸存者的持续护理。
Pub Date : 2008-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2008.111714
Joseph R Carver, Andrea Ng, Anna T Meadows, David J Vaughn
{"title":"Cardiovascular late effects and the ongoing care of adult cancer survivors.","authors":"Joseph R Carver, Andrea Ng, Anna T Meadows, David J Vaughn","doi":"10.1089/dis.2008.111714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.111714","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.111714","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27268925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Disease management in the frail and elderly population: integration of physicians in the intervention. 体弱多病和老年人的疾病管理:医生在干预中的整合。
Pub Date : 2008-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2008.111720
Jay Want, Gregg Kamas, Thanh-Nghia Nguyen

As financial, social, and quality-of-life challenges associated with chronic disease in the United States continue to proliferate, disease management (DM) has been identified as a viable and positive approach that serves all areas of impact. Using an "in-house" model, Physician Health Partners, LLC, designed, developed, and implemented a DM program for the frail and elderly population. Given the special needs of this population the typical DM intervention was modified to include elements of physician involvement. The Frail and Elderly Program, as the DM program is called, produced statistically significant improvements in functional, behavioral, and clinical status and health-related quality of life. This model can help result in program success with potential benefits for individuals, practices, communities, and all whose lives are touched, directly or indirectly, by chronic disease.

随着美国与慢性疾病相关的经济、社会和生活质量挑战不断增加,疾病管理(DM)已被确定为一种可行的、积极的方法,服务于所有影响领域。医师健康合作伙伴有限责任公司采用“内部”模式,设计、开发并实施了针对体弱和老年人的糖尿病计划。考虑到这一人群的特殊需求,典型的糖尿病干预被修改为包括医生参与的因素。体弱多病和老年人项目,即DM项目,在功能、行为、临床状态和健康相关的生活质量方面产生了统计上显著的改善。这种模式可以帮助项目取得成功,对个人、实践、社区以及所有直接或间接受到慢性病影响的人都有潜在的好处。
{"title":"Disease management in the frail and elderly population: integration of physicians in the intervention.","authors":"Jay Want,&nbsp;Gregg Kamas,&nbsp;Thanh-Nghia Nguyen","doi":"10.1089/dis.2008.111720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.111720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As financial, social, and quality-of-life challenges associated with chronic disease in the United States continue to proliferate, disease management (DM) has been identified as a viable and positive approach that serves all areas of impact. Using an \"in-house\" model, Physician Health Partners, LLC, designed, developed, and implemented a DM program for the frail and elderly population. Given the special needs of this population the typical DM intervention was modified to include elements of physician involvement. The Frail and Elderly Program, as the DM program is called, produced statistically significant improvements in functional, behavioral, and clinical status and health-related quality of life. This model can help result in program success with potential benefits for individuals, practices, communities, and all whose lives are touched, directly or indirectly, by chronic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 1","pages":"23-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.111720","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27268928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Guided care: cost and utilization outcomes in a pilot study. 引导式护理:试点研究的成本和利用结果。
Pub Date : 2008-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2008.111723
Martha L Sylvia, Michael Griswold, Linda Dunbar, Cynthia M Boyd, Margaret Park, Chad Boult

Guided Care (GC) is an enhancement to primary care that incorporates the operative principles of disease management and chronic care innovations. In a 6-month quasi-experimental study, we compared the cost and utilization patterns of patients assigned to GC and Usual Care (UC). The setting was a community-based general internal medicine practice. The participants were patients of 4 general internists. They were older, chronically ill, community-dwelling patients, members of a capitated health plan, and identified as high risk. Using the Adjusted Clinical Groups Predictive Model (ACG-PM), we identified those at highest risk of future health care utilization. We selected the 75 highest-risk older patients of 2 internists at a primary care practice to receive GC and the 75 highest-risk older patients of 2 other internists in the same practice to receive UC. Insurance data were used to describe the groups' demographics, chronic conditions, insurance expenditures, and utilization. Among our results, at baseline, the GC (all targeted patients) and UC groups were similar in demographics and prevalence of chronic conditions, but the GC group had a higher mean ACG-PM risk score (0.34 vs. 0.20, p < 0.0001). During the following 6 months, the GC group had lower unadjusted mean insurance expenditures, hospital admissions, hospital days, and emergency department visits (p > 0.05). There were larger differences in insurance expenditures between the GC and UC groups at lower risk levels (at ACG-PM = 0.10, mean difference = $4340; at ACG-PM = 0.6, mean difference = $1304). Thirty-one of the 75 patients assigned to receive GC actually enrolled in the intervention. These results suggest that GC may reduce insurance expenditures for high-risk older adults. If these results are confirmed in larger, randomized studies, GC may help to increase the efficiency of health care for the aging American population.

导向性护理(GC)是对初级保健的一种增强,它结合了疾病管理和慢性护理创新的操作原则。在一项为期6个月的准实验研究中,我们比较了分配给GC和常规护理(UC)的患者的成本和利用模式。环境是一个以社区为基础的普通内科实践。研究对象为4名普通内科医生的患者。他们是老年人、慢性病患者、社区居民、有资本的健康计划的成员,并被确定为高风险。使用调整临床组预测模型(ACG-PM),我们确定了未来医疗保健使用风险最高的人群。我们选择了一家初级保健诊所的2名内科医生的75名风险最高的老年患者接受GC,并选择了另外2名内科医生的75名风险最高的老年患者接受UC。保险数据用于描述群体的人口统计、慢性病、保险支出和使用情况。在我们的研究结果中,在基线时,GC组(所有目标患者)和UC组在人口统计学和慢性病患病率方面相似,但GC组的ACG-PM平均风险评分更高(0.34比0.20,p < 0.0001)。在接下来的6个月里,GC组未经调整的平均保险费用、住院次数、住院天数和急诊科就诊次数均低于对照组(p > 0.05)。在较低风险水平下,GC组和UC组之间的保险支出差异较大(ACG-PM = 0.10,平均差异= 4340美元;ACG-PM = 0.6,平均差值= 1304美元)。在75名接受GC治疗的患者中,有31名实际参加了干预。这些结果表明,GC可能会减少高风险老年人的保险支出。如果这些结果在更大规模的随机研究中得到证实,GC可能有助于提高美国老龄化人口的医疗保健效率。
{"title":"Guided care: cost and utilization outcomes in a pilot study.","authors":"Martha L Sylvia,&nbsp;Michael Griswold,&nbsp;Linda Dunbar,&nbsp;Cynthia M Boyd,&nbsp;Margaret Park,&nbsp;Chad Boult","doi":"10.1089/dis.2008.111723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.111723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided Care (GC) is an enhancement to primary care that incorporates the operative principles of disease management and chronic care innovations. In a 6-month quasi-experimental study, we compared the cost and utilization patterns of patients assigned to GC and Usual Care (UC). The setting was a community-based general internal medicine practice. The participants were patients of 4 general internists. They were older, chronically ill, community-dwelling patients, members of a capitated health plan, and identified as high risk. Using the Adjusted Clinical Groups Predictive Model (ACG-PM), we identified those at highest risk of future health care utilization. We selected the 75 highest-risk older patients of 2 internists at a primary care practice to receive GC and the 75 highest-risk older patients of 2 other internists in the same practice to receive UC. Insurance data were used to describe the groups' demographics, chronic conditions, insurance expenditures, and utilization. Among our results, at baseline, the GC (all targeted patients) and UC groups were similar in demographics and prevalence of chronic conditions, but the GC group had a higher mean ACG-PM risk score (0.34 vs. 0.20, p < 0.0001). During the following 6 months, the GC group had lower unadjusted mean insurance expenditures, hospital admissions, hospital days, and emergency department visits (p > 0.05). There were larger differences in insurance expenditures between the GC and UC groups at lower risk levels (at ACG-PM = 0.10, mean difference = $4340; at ACG-PM = 0.6, mean difference = $1304). Thirty-one of the 75 patients assigned to receive GC actually enrolled in the intervention. These results suggest that GC may reduce insurance expenditures for high-risk older adults. If these results are confirmed in larger, randomized studies, GC may help to increase the efficiency of health care for the aging American population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 1","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.111723","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27268929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86
Opt-in medical management strategies. 选择性医疗管理策略。
Pub Date : 2008-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2008.111721
Donald Fetterolf, Marty Olson

Historically, health plans and disease management companies have employed "opt-out" strategies for evaluating medical management outcomes across larger populations, targeting the entire population of eligible individuals and allowing those not interested to opt out. Recent observations that the predominant effort of these programs is on high-risk patients has lead some managers to suggest that the focus be on only those individuals with an anticipated higher effectiveness and lower cost to the payers of such services. They believe such "opt-in" models, in which only higher risk participants are targeted and enrolled, will deliver higher value. The use of common opt-in models, however, is not only methodologically unsound, but experience in the field suggests there may be less overall effect as well. Calculation methods for developing impact remain extremely sensitive to methodology

从历史上看,健康计划和疾病管理公司采用“选择退出”策略来评估更大人群的医疗管理结果,针对所有符合条件的个人,并允许那些不感兴趣的人选择退出。最近的观察表明,这些项目的主要努力是针对高危患者,这使得一些管理者建议,只关注那些对此类服务的支付者来说预期效果更高、成本更低的个人。他们认为,这种“选择加入”模式——只有高风险参与者才会被锁定并登记——将带来更高的价值。然而,使用普通的选择加入模型不仅在方法上是不健全的,而且该领域的经验表明,总体效果也可能较差。发展影响的计算方法仍然对方法学极为敏感
{"title":"Opt-in medical management strategies.","authors":"Donald Fetterolf,&nbsp;Marty Olson","doi":"10.1089/dis.2008.111721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.111721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, health plans and disease management companies have employed \"opt-out\" strategies for evaluating medical management outcomes across larger populations, targeting the entire population of eligible individuals and allowing those not interested to opt out. Recent observations that the predominant effort of these programs is on high-risk patients has lead some managers to suggest that the focus be on only those individuals with an anticipated higher effectiveness and lower cost to the payers of such services. They believe such \"opt-in\" models, in which only higher risk participants are targeted and enrolled, will deliver higher value. The use of common opt-in models, however, is not only methodologically unsound, but experience in the field suggests there may be less overall effect as well. Calculation methods for developing impact remain extremely sensitive to methodology</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 1","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.111721","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27268930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Therapeutic specificity in disease management evaluation. 疾病管理评价中的治疗特异性。
Pub Date : 2008-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2008.111725
Scott Macstravic
{"title":"Therapeutic specificity in disease management evaluation.","authors":"Scott Macstravic","doi":"10.1089/dis.2008.111725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2008.111725","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"11 1","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2008.111725","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27268926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Number needed to succeed in disease management. 成功进行疾病管理所需的人数。
Pub Date : 2007-12-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2007.106703
Scott MacStravic
THE IDEA IS BOTH SIMPLE and logical, but there has been a good deal of controversy over the use of “Number Needed to Decrease” (NND) analysis (which here I label as “Number Needed to Succeed” [NNS] analysis) as a tool in considering proposed disease management (DM) investments. This analysis method first considers the costs of DM interventions compared to the cost savings potential for each one, then determines how many “cases” of cost-generating episodes of care (eg, inpatient admissions, emergency room [ER] visits) would have to be eliminated from future utilization in order to cover the costs of DM (“breakeven”) or yield a desired return on investment (ROI) ratio and net savings. In his first published article on this model, its creator described the NND approach and illustrated its use relative to 4 different chronic diseases: asthma, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and congestive heart failure.1 He based his analysis of savings on hospital admissions and ER visits and concluded that because of the low rates of these events among patients with these conditions, significant reductions would be needed to generate significant savings. He based his cost of the DM intervention on fees per plan member, not per DM prospect or participant, and because of the low incidence of these conditions in most populations, this created a high cost per person with the conditions. [Note: While charging a fee for every member of a population makes costs more predictable for payors and vendors, it is likely to increase the costs compared to the benefits of DM interventions. If vendors charge $2.00 per member per month for a given DM program, while only 2% of the members have the disease it addresses, then the cost per individual who has any likelihood of having reduced health care costs is $2.00 divided by 2% or $100 per person affected per month. This makes it necessary that each person affected generate savings of at least $1200 per year just to break even. If only half of those affected actually participate in the DM program, each participant will have to generate savings of $2400 per year to break even. By contrast, if vendors were to charge based on the number of people in the population with a given disease, and charge enough to cover the costs to the vendor of that number of participants, even if that meant raising fees to $200 per year per participant, each participant would have to generate only $200 to break even, or $400 to achieve an ROI of $2.00:1. Even if vendors charged per person affected, and only half those affected participated, this would still require savings of only $400 per participant to break even and $800 each to achieve a $2.00:1 ROI.] The combination of the limited cost focus and high imputed costs per person affected yielded projected requirements for between 10% and 20% decreases in utilization of hospi-
{"title":"Number needed to succeed in disease management.","authors":"Scott MacStravic","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.106703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.106703","url":null,"abstract":"THE IDEA IS BOTH SIMPLE and logical, but there has been a good deal of controversy over the use of “Number Needed to Decrease” (NND) analysis (which here I label as “Number Needed to Succeed” [NNS] analysis) as a tool in considering proposed disease management (DM) investments. This analysis method first considers the costs of DM interventions compared to the cost savings potential for each one, then determines how many “cases” of cost-generating episodes of care (eg, inpatient admissions, emergency room [ER] visits) would have to be eliminated from future utilization in order to cover the costs of DM (“breakeven”) or yield a desired return on investment (ROI) ratio and net savings. In his first published article on this model, its creator described the NND approach and illustrated its use relative to 4 different chronic diseases: asthma, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and congestive heart failure.1 He based his analysis of savings on hospital admissions and ER visits and concluded that because of the low rates of these events among patients with these conditions, significant reductions would be needed to generate significant savings. He based his cost of the DM intervention on fees per plan member, not per DM prospect or participant, and because of the low incidence of these conditions in most populations, this created a high cost per person with the conditions. [Note: While charging a fee for every member of a population makes costs more predictable for payors and vendors, it is likely to increase the costs compared to the benefits of DM interventions. If vendors charge $2.00 per member per month for a given DM program, while only 2% of the members have the disease it addresses, then the cost per individual who has any likelihood of having reduced health care costs is $2.00 divided by 2% or $100 per person affected per month. This makes it necessary that each person affected generate savings of at least $1200 per year just to break even. If only half of those affected actually participate in the DM program, each participant will have to generate savings of $2400 per year to break even. By contrast, if vendors were to charge based on the number of people in the population with a given disease, and charge enough to cover the costs to the vendor of that number of participants, even if that meant raising fees to $200 per year per participant, each participant would have to generate only $200 to break even, or $400 to achieve an ROI of $2.00:1. Even if vendors charged per person affected, and only half those affected participated, this would still require savings of only $400 per participant to break even and $800 each to achieve a $2.00:1 ROI.] The combination of the limited cost focus and high imputed costs per person affected yielded projected requirements for between 10% and 20% decreases in utilization of hospi-","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 6","pages":"311-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.106703","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27195377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Iatrogenic disease management: moderating medication errors and risks in a pharmacy benefit management environment. 医源性疾病管理:在药房利益管理环境中缓和用药错误和风险。
Pub Date : 2007-12-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2007.106617
Vinit Nair, J Warren Salmon, Alan F Kaul

Disease Management (DM) programs have advanced to address costly chronic disease patterns in populations. This is in part due to the programs' significant clinical and economical value, coupled with interest by pharmaceutical manufacturers, managed care organizations, and pharmacy benefit management firms. While cost containment realizations for many such interventions have been less than anticipated, this article explores potentials in marrying Medication Error Risk Reduction into DM programs within managed care environments. Medication errors are an emergent serious problem now gaining attention in US health policy. They represent a failure within population-based health programs because they remain significant cost drivers. Therefore, medication errors should be addressed in an organized fashion, with DM being a worthy candidate for piggybacking such programs to achieve the best synergistic effects.

疾病管理(DM)项目在解决人群中昂贵的慢性疾病模式方面取得了进展。这在一定程度上是由于该项目具有重要的临床和经济价值,以及制药商、管理医疗机构和药房福利管理公司的兴趣。虽然许多此类干预措施的成本控制实现比预期的要少,但本文探讨了将药物错误风险降低与管理式医疗环境中的DM项目结合起来的潜力。用药错误是美国卫生政策中一个亟待解决的严重问题。它们代表了以人群为基础的健康计划的失败,因为它们仍然是重要的成本驱动因素。因此,用药错误应该以一种有组织的方式解决,DM是一个有价值的候选人,可以承载这样的项目,以实现最佳的协同效应。
{"title":"Iatrogenic disease management: moderating medication errors and risks in a pharmacy benefit management environment.","authors":"Vinit Nair,&nbsp;J Warren Salmon,&nbsp;Alan F Kaul","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.106617","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.106617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disease Management (DM) programs have advanced to address costly chronic disease patterns in populations. This is in part due to the programs' significant clinical and economical value, coupled with interest by pharmaceutical manufacturers, managed care organizations, and pharmacy benefit management firms. While cost containment realizations for many such interventions have been less than anticipated, this article explores potentials in marrying Medication Error Risk Reduction into DM programs within managed care environments. Medication errors are an emergent serious problem now gaining attention in US health policy. They represent a failure within population-based health programs because they remain significant cost drivers. Therefore, medication errors should be addressed in an organized fashion, with DM being a worthy candidate for piggybacking such programs to achieve the best synergistic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 6","pages":"337-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.106617","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27196281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Healing the health care system. 修复医疗保健系统。
Pub Date : 2007-12-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2007.106731
David B Nash, Raymond C Grandon, Doris N Grandon
{"title":"Healing the health care system.","authors":"David B Nash,&nbsp;Raymond C Grandon,&nbsp;Doris N Grandon","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.106731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.106731","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 6","pages":"315-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.106731","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27196279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes: comorbidity risks. 可避免的糖尿病住院:合并症风险。
Pub Date : 2007-12-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2007.106709
Melissa M Ahern, Michael Hendryx

This study examined the risk for avoidable diabetes hospitalizations associated with comorbid conditions and other risk variables. A retrospective analysis was conducted of hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of diabetes in a 2004 sample of short stay general hospitals in the United States (N = 97,526.) Data were drawn from the Health Care Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. Avoidable hospitalizations were defined using criteria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to analyze 2 types of ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs): short-term complications and uncontrolled diabetes. Maternal cases, patients younger than age 18, and transfers from other hospitals were excluded. Avoidable hospitalization was estimated using maximum likelihood logistic regression analysis, where independent variables included patient age, gender, comorbidities, uninsurance status, patient's rural-urban residence and income estimate, and hospital variables. Models were identified using multiple runs on 3 random quartiles and validated using the fourth quartile. Costs were estimated from charge data using cost-to-charge ratios. Results indicated that these 2 ACSCs accounted for 35,312 or 36% of all diabetes hospitalizations. Multiple types of comorbid conditions were related to risk for avoidable diabetes hospitalizations. Estimated costs and length of stay were lower among these types of avoidable hospitalizations compared to other diabetes hospitalizations; however, total estimated nationwide costs for 2004 short-term complications and uncontrolled diabetes hospitalizations totaled over $1.3 billion. Recommendations are made for how disease management programs for diabetes could incorporate treatment for comorbid conditions to reduce hospitalization risk.

本研究检查了与合并症和其他风险变量相关的可避免糖尿病住院的风险。回顾性分析了2004年美国短期住院综合医院中原发性诊断为糖尿病的住院病例(N = 97,526)。数据来自卫生保健利用项目全国住院病人样本。根据医疗保健研究和质量机构的标准,对可避免的住院治疗进行定义,分析两种类型的门诊护理敏感条件(ACSCs):短期并发症和未控制的糖尿病。排除了产妇病例、18岁以下患者和从其他医院转来的患者。使用最大似然logistic回归分析估计可避免住院,其中自变量包括患者年龄、性别、合并症、无保险状况、患者城乡居住和收入估计以及医院变量。通过在3个随机四分位数上进行多次运行来确定模型,并使用第四个四分位数进行验证。成本是根据使用成本-收费比率的收费数据估计的。结果表明,这2种ACSCs占所有糖尿病住院患者的35,312例,占36%。多种类型的合并症与可避免的糖尿病住院风险相关。与其他糖尿病住院相比,这些可避免住院的估计费用和住院时间较低;然而,2004年全国短期并发症和不受控制的糖尿病住院总费用估计超过13亿美元。对糖尿病的疾病管理方案如何纳入合并症的治疗以降低住院风险提出了建议。
{"title":"Avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes: comorbidity risks.","authors":"Melissa M Ahern,&nbsp;Michael Hendryx","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.106709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.106709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the risk for avoidable diabetes hospitalizations associated with comorbid conditions and other risk variables. A retrospective analysis was conducted of hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of diabetes in a 2004 sample of short stay general hospitals in the United States (N = 97,526.) Data were drawn from the Health Care Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. Avoidable hospitalizations were defined using criteria from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to analyze 2 types of ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs): short-term complications and uncontrolled diabetes. Maternal cases, patients younger than age 18, and transfers from other hospitals were excluded. Avoidable hospitalization was estimated using maximum likelihood logistic regression analysis, where independent variables included patient age, gender, comorbidities, uninsurance status, patient's rural-urban residence and income estimate, and hospital variables. Models were identified using multiple runs on 3 random quartiles and validated using the fourth quartile. Costs were estimated from charge data using cost-to-charge ratios. Results indicated that these 2 ACSCs accounted for 35,312 or 36% of all diabetes hospitalizations. Multiple types of comorbid conditions were related to risk for avoidable diabetes hospitalizations. Estimated costs and length of stay were lower among these types of avoidable hospitalizations compared to other diabetes hospitalizations; however, total estimated nationwide costs for 2004 short-term complications and uncontrolled diabetes hospitalizations totaled over $1.3 billion. Recommendations are made for how disease management programs for diabetes could incorporate treatment for comorbid conditions to reduce hospitalization risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 6","pages":"347-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.106709","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27196282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39
Patient adherence: present state and future directions. 患者依从性:现状和未来方向。
Pub Date : 2007-12-01 DOI: 10.1089/dis.2007.106650
Robin S Turpin, Pamela B Blumberg, Claire E Sharda, Lucille A C Salvucci, Brian Haggert, Jeffrey B Simmons
{"title":"Patient adherence: present state and future directions.","authors":"Robin S Turpin,&nbsp;Pamela B Blumberg,&nbsp;Claire E Sharda,&nbsp;Lucille A C Salvucci,&nbsp;Brian Haggert,&nbsp;Jeffrey B Simmons","doi":"10.1089/dis.2007.106650","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dis.2007.106650","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51235,"journal":{"name":"Disease Management : Dm","volume":"10 6","pages":"305-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/dis.2007.106650","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"27195375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Disease Management : Dm
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1