<p>The therapeutic journey of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in type 2 diabetes reflects a remarkable transformation in clinical medicine. When these agents were first introduced more than a decade ago, skepticism prevailed. Their mechanism of action, independent of pancreatic β-cell stimulation, raised doubts about the durability of glycemic efficacy. Safety concerns were also voiced, particularly regarding dehydration, genitourinary infections, and the possibility of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. Moreover, some speculated that metabolic change might lead to impaired amino acid utilization, muscle catabolism, and sarcopenia in vulnerable patients. Over 10 years later, however, most of these initial fears have been largely dispelled: with appropriate use, SGLT2 inhibitors have proven to provide durable glucose lowering together with systemic benefits. Experimental studies have also demonstrated protective effects on pancreatic β cells, suggesting that SGLT2 inhibition may contribute to the preservation of endogenous insulin secretion capacity<span><sup>1</sup></span>. What was once regarded as a controversial class of glucose-lowering drugs is now widely recognized as a cornerstone of diabetes management, offering multi-organ protection that extends to the cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and even neurological systems (Figure 1).</p><p>A line of evidence has reduced safety concerns. Long-term observational data from East Asia demonstrated that the overall incidence of adverse events with SGLT2 inhibition was below 5% even in older patients<span><sup>2</sup></span>. A large prospective multicenter study in Japan reported that adverse events were mainly limited to mild or moderate urinary/genital infections and volume depletion, and importantly, unexpected serious safety signals were observed<span><sup>3</sup></span>.</p><p>A recent systematic review and meta-analysis with over 77,000 older or frail patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was associated with an approximately 20% reduction in all-cause mortality and a 30% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure<span><sup>4</sup></span>. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors consistently lower the risk of death and heart failure hospitalization even in frail or older individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p><p>In a large 3-year post-marketing surveillance study conducted in Japan, empagliflozin was well tolerated across a broad age range, with no major new safety concerns identified<span><sup>5</sup></span>. The magnitude of weight reduction varied by baseline body mass index (BMI): the greatest decrease was observed in patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas almost no change was seen in patients with BMI <20 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors are generally safe and effective even in lean and elderly patients.</p><p>An interesting analysis using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC)
restore -肾病研究表明,tofogliflozin可减少2型糖尿病和糖尿病肾病患者的尿白蛋白排泄并改善肝酶。值得注意的是,尿白蛋白水平在治疗期间下降,停药后上升,再次给药后再次下降,突出了其肾保护作用的可逆性和持续治疗的重要性。除了保护肾脏,微血管对眼睛的影响现在也被认识到。在一项来自日本的全国范围的数据分析中,包括2412名倾向评分匹配的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者,SGLT2抑制剂治疗显著降低了玻璃体内注射曲安奈德的需求,发病率为63.8 vs 94.9 / 1000人年,重复注射的风险比为0.66-0.44 13。因此,SGLT2抑制剂可能作为一种新的、低成本的辅助选择治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿。也许,最令人兴奋的前沿涉及认知。在一项以人群为基础的2型糖尿病老年人回顾性队列研究中,根据倾向评分加权Cox模型,与DPP-4抑制剂相比,开始使用SGLT2抑制剂可使痴呆发生风险降低约20% (aHR 0.80)。使用孟德尔随机化的遗传学研究也支持SGLT2抑制的神经保护作用,将遗传代理抑制与长寿、更好的认知和衰老的大脑结构标志物联系起来。一项前瞻性队列研究表明,henagliflozin可显著改善2型糖尿病合并认知功能障碍患者的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分,降低血浆p-tau181水平,且独立于血糖控制16。这些结果突出了SGLT2抑制剂将其器官保护功能扩展到大脑的潜力。综合这些不同的发现,SGLT2抑制剂显然已经超越了它们最初作为降血糖药物的作用。它们现在被广泛认为是系统性器官保护疗法,在心血管、肾脏、肝脏、眼科和神经系统领域都有益处。然而,重要的差距仍然存在。老年体弱伴肌肉减少症、认知障碍或功能依赖的证据仍然有限。虽然早期数据很有希望,但需要专门的大规模随机对照试验和微血管和神经保护途径的机制研究。最后,联合方法,特别是GLP-1受体激动剂,代表了协同器官保护的一个令人兴奋的前沿。总之,经过十多年的临床使用,早期的担忧已经被安全性和多器官益处的一致证据所取代。综上所述,来自众多研究的发现表明SGLT2抑制剂是一种变革性疗法,能够在人口老龄化时代重塑糖尿病护理,在这个时代,系统性保护越来越重要。曾担任诺和诺德制药、三和鹿歌制药、大正制药、住友制药、三菱田边制药、日本勃林格殷格翰制药等公司的顾问,并获得讲座奖金和奖学金。数据共享不适用于本文,因为在当前研究期间没有生成或分析数据集。
{"title":"A decade of SGLT2 inhibitors: Lessons learned and the road ahead in type 2 diabetes","authors":"Tomohiko Kimura, Kohei Kaku","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70187","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jdi.70187","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The therapeutic journey of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in type 2 diabetes reflects a remarkable transformation in clinical medicine. When these agents were first introduced more than a decade ago, skepticism prevailed. Their mechanism of action, independent of pancreatic β-cell stimulation, raised doubts about the durability of glycemic efficacy. Safety concerns were also voiced, particularly regarding dehydration, genitourinary infections, and the possibility of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. Moreover, some speculated that metabolic change might lead to impaired amino acid utilization, muscle catabolism, and sarcopenia in vulnerable patients. Over 10 years later, however, most of these initial fears have been largely dispelled: with appropriate use, SGLT2 inhibitors have proven to provide durable glucose lowering together with systemic benefits. Experimental studies have also demonstrated protective effects on pancreatic β cells, suggesting that SGLT2 inhibition may contribute to the preservation of endogenous insulin secretion capacity<span><sup>1</sup></span>. What was once regarded as a controversial class of glucose-lowering drugs is now widely recognized as a cornerstone of diabetes management, offering multi-organ protection that extends to the cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, and even neurological systems (Figure 1).</p><p>A line of evidence has reduced safety concerns. Long-term observational data from East Asia demonstrated that the overall incidence of adverse events with SGLT2 inhibition was below 5% even in older patients<span><sup>2</sup></span>. A large prospective multicenter study in Japan reported that adverse events were mainly limited to mild or moderate urinary/genital infections and volume depletion, and importantly, unexpected serious safety signals were observed<span><sup>3</sup></span>.</p><p>A recent systematic review and meta-analysis with over 77,000 older or frail patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitor therapy was associated with an approximately 20% reduction in all-cause mortality and a 30% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure<span><sup>4</sup></span>. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors consistently lower the risk of death and heart failure hospitalization even in frail or older individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p><p>In a large 3-year post-marketing surveillance study conducted in Japan, empagliflozin was well tolerated across a broad age range, with no major new safety concerns identified<span><sup>5</sup></span>. The magnitude of weight reduction varied by baseline body mass index (BMI): the greatest decrease was observed in patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, whereas almost no change was seen in patients with BMI <20 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors are generally safe and effective even in lean and elderly patients.</p><p>An interesting analysis using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC)","PeriodicalId":51250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":"16 12","pages":"2142-2144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdi.70187","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145407700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}