<p>Multiple large cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have robustly shown that GLP-1 RAs lower the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes. Yet, two important knowledge gaps remain. First, previous CVOTs were dominated by injectable agents, leaving uncertainty about whether once-daily oral GLP-1 RAs confer comparable protection. Second, kidney benefits were inferred almost entirely from secondary endpoints of cardiovascular trials rather than from a kidney-specific outcomes study.</p><p>The latest meta-analysis published by Lee <i>et al</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span> in <i>Diabetes Care</i> in 2025 presents the largest meta-analysis to date of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with long-acting injectable and oral GLP-1 RAs in type 2 diabetes. Their study pools 10 trials (<i>n</i> = 71,351) and incorporates both the SOUL cardiovascular-outcome trial of oral semaglutide<span><sup>2</sup></span>- and the FLOW kidney-outcome trial of once-weekly semaglutide<span><sup>3</sup></span> (Table 1). In the meta-analysis, across a median 3.2-year follow-up, long-acting GLP-1 RAs reduced three-point MACE by 14% (HR 0.86), hospitalization for heart failure by 14%, composite kidney events by 17%, and all-cause mortality by 12%, without new safety concerns.</p><p>Earlier meta-analyses were dominated by injectable agents, leaving uncertainty over whether once-daily oral semaglutide could match them. Lee <i>et al</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span> found no heterogeneity across administration routes for any efficacy endpoint (between-group heterogeneity <i>P</i> = 0.984). This underscores the potential of oral GLP-1 RA therapy to deliver clinical ‘hard outcome’ benefits comparable with injectables, allowing treatment to be tailored to individual preference.</p><p>However, the study also highlighted a permanent discontinuation rate of 25% in FLOW (injectable) and 27% in SOUL (oral). Discontinuation is influenced by patient preference, administration route, dosing frequency, convenience, and complexity, among other factors. Because oral semaglutide must be taken on an empty stomach with a small sip of water and followed by a 30-min fast, clinicians need to counsel patients carefully to optimize adherence.</p><p>FLOW, the first GLP-1 RA trial that used a hard kidney endpoint as its primary outcome, showed a 24% risk reduction in kidney failure–centric events alongside an 18% reduction in MACE. Pooled with the other trials, the class achieved a 17% reduction in composite kidney outcomes, reinforcing GLP-1 RAs as renoprotective agents.</p><p>The meta-analysis detected no increase in severe hypoglycemia, diabetic retinopathy, pancreatitis, or selected cancers versus placebo, consistent with prior safety reports.</p><p>Effect sizes mirror those of earlier meta-analysis with fewer individuals or the one that includes SELECT trial<span><sup>4</sup></span>, a CVOT of semaglutide i
{"title":"Cardiovascular and kidney benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists across large randomized placebo-controlled trials","authors":"Satoshi Yoshiji, Nobuya Inagaki","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70166","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jdi.70166","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple large cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have robustly shown that GLP-1 RAs lower the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes. Yet, two important knowledge gaps remain. First, previous CVOTs were dominated by injectable agents, leaving uncertainty about whether once-daily oral GLP-1 RAs confer comparable protection. Second, kidney benefits were inferred almost entirely from secondary endpoints of cardiovascular trials rather than from a kidney-specific outcomes study.</p><p>The latest meta-analysis published by Lee <i>et al</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span> in <i>Diabetes Care</i> in 2025 presents the largest meta-analysis to date of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with long-acting injectable and oral GLP-1 RAs in type 2 diabetes. Their study pools 10 trials (<i>n</i> = 71,351) and incorporates both the SOUL cardiovascular-outcome trial of oral semaglutide<span><sup>2</sup></span>- and the FLOW kidney-outcome trial of once-weekly semaglutide<span><sup>3</sup></span> (Table 1). In the meta-analysis, across a median 3.2-year follow-up, long-acting GLP-1 RAs reduced three-point MACE by 14% (HR 0.86), hospitalization for heart failure by 14%, composite kidney events by 17%, and all-cause mortality by 12%, without new safety concerns.</p><p>Earlier meta-analyses were dominated by injectable agents, leaving uncertainty over whether once-daily oral semaglutide could match them. Lee <i>et al</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span> found no heterogeneity across administration routes for any efficacy endpoint (between-group heterogeneity <i>P</i> = 0.984). This underscores the potential of oral GLP-1 RA therapy to deliver clinical ‘hard outcome’ benefits comparable with injectables, allowing treatment to be tailored to individual preference.</p><p>However, the study also highlighted a permanent discontinuation rate of 25% in FLOW (injectable) and 27% in SOUL (oral). Discontinuation is influenced by patient preference, administration route, dosing frequency, convenience, and complexity, among other factors. Because oral semaglutide must be taken on an empty stomach with a small sip of water and followed by a 30-min fast, clinicians need to counsel patients carefully to optimize adherence.</p><p>FLOW, the first GLP-1 RA trial that used a hard kidney endpoint as its primary outcome, showed a 24% risk reduction in kidney failure–centric events alongside an 18% reduction in MACE. Pooled with the other trials, the class achieved a 17% reduction in composite kidney outcomes, reinforcing GLP-1 RAs as renoprotective agents.</p><p>The meta-analysis detected no increase in severe hypoglycemia, diabetic retinopathy, pancreatitis, or selected cancers versus placebo, consistent with prior safety reports.</p><p>Effect sizes mirror those of earlier meta-analysis with fewer individuals or the one that includes SELECT trial<span><sup>4</sup></span>, a CVOT of semaglutide i","PeriodicalId":51250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":"16 12","pages":"2140-2141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdi.70166","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}