Dear Editor,
Ye et al.1, in their study entitled ‘Inhibition of the LINC00707/miR-223-3p/FKBP5 axis has a protective effect on diabetic kidney disease,’ explores the LINC00707/miR-223-3p/FKBP5 pathway in diabetic nephropathy, revealing useful understanding of LINC00707 silencing's protective actions on kidney filtering cells during hyperglycemia. Employing mannitol comparisons and SOD assessments reinforces methodology. However, several aspects could enhance the study's impact.
First, their protocol utilized only 30 mmol/L glucose across 48 h. Examining varied sugar concentrations (5–40 mmol/L) would establish response boundaries2. Specifying the delivery approach (single dose vs progressive elevation) might better simulate actual patient sugar levels3.
Second, the study measures MDA and SOD activity, showing reduced oxidative stress after LINC00707 silencing. Adding markers like reduced glutathione or HO-1 activity would provide a fuller picture of redox dynamics4. This could confirm whether oxidative stress drives or follows podocyte injury.
Third, the clinical cohort is stratified by albuminuria. Including eGFR-based staging would link LINC00707 levels to renal function decline5. This could strengthen its potential as a biomarker.
Additionally, there is a discrepancy in the reporting of LDL-C significance. In table 1, the P-value for LDL-C is reported as 0.236 (non-significant), but it is labeled as significant in the text. This inconsistency should be addressed to ensure the accuracy of the data interpretation.
These suggestions aim to build on the study's robust foundation. Addressing them could deepen its mechanistic and clinical contributions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Approval of the research protocol: N/A.
Informed consent: N/A.
Registry and the registration no. of the study/trial: N/A.
Animal studies: N/A.
There is no original data for this letter to the editor.
Dear Editor,
This study1 offers valuable insights into cordycepin's role in diabetic nephropathy (DN), particularly its modulation of ferroptosis via SLC7A11/GPX4. However, three critical concerns warrant attention to strengthen clinical applicability and mechanistic depth. First, the exclusive use of high-glucose (HG)-treated MPC5 cells and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice limits translational relevance. STZ models mimic type 1 diabetes, while DN predominantly complicates type 2 diabetes (T2D), which involves insulin resistance and heterogeneous renal pathology not captured here2. Human podocytes or patient-derived cells would better reflect DN pathophysiology. Second, the SLC7A11/GPX4 axis is presented in isolation, neglecting crosstalk with established DN pathways like nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Nrf2 regulates GPX4 and ferroptosis in DN but was unexplored3. Validating interactions using Nrf2 inhibitors (e.g., ML385) could clarify the mechanistic hierarchy. Third, the cordycepin dose (400 mg/kg in mice) raises safety concerns. This far exceeds typical human-equivalent doses (~3–6 mg/kg) and lacks supporting toxicity data4. Dose–response studies in T2D models (e.g., db/db mice) and renal/hepatic safety assays are essential.
To address these gaps, future work should prioritize human cell lines, incorporate T2D models, and probe Nrf2-SLC7A11/GPX4 crosstalk. Additionally, lower cordycepin doses with toxicity profiling would enhance therapeutic feasibility. These steps may bridge mechanistic findings to clinical practice, aligning with precision medicine approaches for DN5.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Approval of the research protocol: N/A.
Informed consent: N/A.
Approval date of registry and the registration no. of the study/trial: N/A.
Animal studies: N/A.
This article is linked to https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.14407.
There is no original data for this letter to the editor.