Pub Date : 2020-04-01DOI: 10.1177/0038040719892577
E. Rauscher
Contradictory evidence of the relationship between education funding and student achievement could reflect heterogeneous effects by revenue source or student characteristics. This study examines potential heterogeneous effects of a particular type of local revenue—bond funds for capital investments—on achievement by socioeconomic status. Comparing California school districts within a narrow window on either side of the cutoff of voter support required to pass a general obligation bond measure, I use dynamic regression discontinuity models to estimate effects of passing a bond on academic achievement among low- and high-socioeconomic-status (SES) students. Results consistently suggest that passing a bond increases achievement among low- but not high-SES students. However, these benefits for low-SES students are delayed and emerge six years after an election. Effects are larger in low-income districts and in small districts, where benefits of capital investments are experienced by a larger proportion of students.
{"title":"Delayed Benefits: Effects of California School District Bond Elections on Achievement by Socioeconomic Status","authors":"E. Rauscher","doi":"10.1177/0038040719892577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040719892577","url":null,"abstract":"Contradictory evidence of the relationship between education funding and student achievement could reflect heterogeneous effects by revenue source or student characteristics. This study examines potential heterogeneous effects of a particular type of local revenue—bond funds for capital investments—on achievement by socioeconomic status. Comparing California school districts within a narrow window on either side of the cutoff of voter support required to pass a general obligation bond measure, I use dynamic regression discontinuity models to estimate effects of passing a bond on academic achievement among low- and high-socioeconomic-status (SES) students. Results consistently suggest that passing a bond increases achievement among low- but not high-SES students. However, these benefits for low-SES students are delayed and emerge six years after an election. Effects are larger in low-income districts and in small districts, where benefits of capital investments are experienced by a larger proportion of students.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76533100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-01Epub Date: 2020-01-22DOI: 10.1177/0038040719899358
Alvaro Hofflinger, Paul T von Hippel
Debates in education policy draw on different theories about how to raise children's achievement. The school competition theory holds that achievement rises when students can choose among competing schools. The school resources theory holds that achievement rises with schools' resources per student. The family resources theory holds that achievement rises as parents become more educated and earn higher incomes. We test all three theories in Chile between 2002 and 2013, when reading and math scores rose by 0.2 to 0.3 standard deviations, as school competition, school resources, and family resources all increased. We compare Chilean municipalities in a difference-in-differences analysis, asking whether test scores rose fastest in municipalities with greater increases in school competition, school resources, or family resources. We find that municipal test scores did not rise with school competition but did rise with family resources (parental education, not income) and, to a smaller extent, with school resources (as measured by class sizes). Results favor the family resource theory, and to a lesser extent the school resource theory, but not the school competition theory.
{"title":"Does Achievement Rise Fastest with School Choice, School Resources, or Family Resources? Chile from 2002 to 2013.","authors":"Alvaro Hofflinger, Paul T von Hippel","doi":"10.1177/0038040719899358","DOIUrl":"10.1177/0038040719899358","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debates in education policy draw on different theories about how to raise children's achievement. The <i>school competition</i> theory holds that achievement rises when students can choose among competing schools. The <i>school resources</i> theory holds that achievement rises with schools' resources per student. The <i>family resources</i> theory holds that achievement rises as parents become more educated and earn higher incomes. We test all three theories in Chile between 2002 and 2013, when reading and math scores rose by 0.2 to 0.3 standard deviations, as school competition, school resources, and family resources all increased. We compare Chilean municipalities in a difference-in-differences analysis, asking whether test scores rose fastest in municipalities with greater increases in school competition, school resources, or family resources. We find that municipal test scores did not rise with school competition but did rise with family resources (parental education, not income) and, to a smaller extent, with school resources (as measured by class sizes). Results favor the family resource theory, and to a lesser extent the school resource theory, but not the school competition theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086698/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78990451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-10DOI: 10.1177/0038040720953218
Jaren Haber
Research shows charter schools are more segregated by race and class than are traditional public schools. I investigate an underexamined mechanism for this segregation: Charter schools project identities corresponding to parents’ race- and class-specific parenting styles and educational values. I use computational text analysis to detect the emphasis on inquiry-based learning in the websites of all charter schools operating in 2015–16. I then estimate mixed linear regression models to test the relationships between ideological emphasis and school- and district-level poverty and ethnicity. I thereby transcend methodological problems in scholarship on charter school identities by collecting contemporary, populationwide data and by blending text analysis with hypothesis testing. Findings suggest charter school identities are both race and class specific, outlining a new mechanism by which school choice may consolidate parents by race and class—and paving the way for behavioral and longitudinal studies. This project contributes to literatures on school choice and educational stratification.
{"title":"Sorting Schools: A Computational Analysis of Charter School Identities and Stratification","authors":"Jaren Haber","doi":"10.1177/0038040720953218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720953218","url":null,"abstract":"Research shows charter schools are more segregated by race and class than are traditional public schools. I investigate an underexamined mechanism for this segregation: Charter schools project identities corresponding to parents’ race- and class-specific parenting styles and educational values. I use computational text analysis to detect the emphasis on inquiry-based learning in the websites of all charter schools operating in 2015–16. I then estimate mixed linear regression models to test the relationships between ideological emphasis and school- and district-level poverty and ethnicity. I thereby transcend methodological problems in scholarship on charter school identities by collecting contemporary, populationwide data and by blending text analysis with hypothesis testing. Findings suggest charter school identities are both race and class specific, outlining a new mechanism by which school choice may consolidate parents by race and class—and paving the way for behavioral and longitudinal studies. This project contributes to literatures on school choice and educational stratification.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81097790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-06DOI: 10.1177/0038040720910128
Jennifer Candipan
School choice expansion in recent decades has weakened the strong link between neighborhoods and schools created under a strict residence-based school assignment system, decoupling residential and school enrollment decisions for some families. Recent work suggests that the neighborhood-school link is weakening the most in neighborhoods experiencing gentrification. Using a novel combination of individual, school, and neighborhood data that link children to both assigned and enrolled schools, this study examines family, school, and neighborhood factors that shape whether parents enroll in the assigned local school. I find that parents are more likely to opt out of neighborhood schools in gentrifying neighborhoods compared with non-gentrifying neighborhoods when nearby choice options are available. Recent movers to gentrifying neighborhoods bypass local schools more compared with parents who have lived in the neighborhood longer. Results have implications for thinking about neighborhood-school linkages in an era of school choice and urban change.
{"title":"Choosing Schools in Changing Places: Examining School Enrollment in Gentrifying Neighborhoods","authors":"Jennifer Candipan","doi":"10.1177/0038040720910128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720910128","url":null,"abstract":"School choice expansion in recent decades has weakened the strong link between neighborhoods and schools created under a strict residence-based school assignment system, decoupling residential and school enrollment decisions for some families. Recent work suggests that the neighborhood-school link is weakening the most in neighborhoods experiencing gentrification. Using a novel combination of individual, school, and neighborhood data that link children to both assigned and enrolled schools, this study examines family, school, and neighborhood factors that shape whether parents enroll in the assigned local school. I find that parents are more likely to opt out of neighborhood schools in gentrifying neighborhoods compared with non-gentrifying neighborhoods when nearby choice options are available. Recent movers to gentrifying neighborhoods bypass local schools more compared with parents who have lived in the neighborhood longer. Results have implications for thinking about neighborhood-school linkages in an era of school choice and urban change.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77824122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-04DOI: 10.1177/0038040720909296
Jayanti Owens
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common behavioral disorder among U.S. children. ADHD diagnoses have risen among children with both severe and mild behavioral problems, partly in response to mounting academic pressure. This study examines the consequences of ADHD diagnosis. Diagnosis can bring beneficial pharmacological treatment and social supports, but it can also trigger negative social and psychological processes, as suggested by labeling theory. For children with mild behavioral problems, diagnosis may trigger awareness of being ‘‘different’’ for the first time, for example through negative teacher/peer effects. By matching diagnosed and otherwise comparable undiagnosed children from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort of 1998–1999, I find that medication has positive effects for diagnosed children with severe prediagnosis behavioral problems, yielding comparable future teacher-rated school behaviors as undiagnosed matches. However, diagnosed and medicated children with mild prediagnosis behavioral problems exhibit poorer future teacher-rated social and academic behaviors than their undiagnosed matches, consistent with labeling theory.
{"title":"Relationships between an ADHD Diagnosis and Future School Behaviors among Children with Mild Behavioral Problems","authors":"Jayanti Owens","doi":"10.1177/0038040720909296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720909296","url":null,"abstract":"Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common behavioral disorder among U.S. children. ADHD diagnoses have risen among children with both severe and mild behavioral problems, partly in response to mounting academic pressure. This study examines the consequences of ADHD diagnosis. Diagnosis can bring beneficial pharmacological treatment and social supports, but it can also trigger negative social and psychological processes, as suggested by labeling theory. For children with mild behavioral problems, diagnosis may trigger awareness of being ‘‘different’’ for the first time, for example through negative teacher/peer effects. By matching diagnosed and otherwise comparable undiagnosed children from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort of 1998–1999, I find that medication has positive effects for diagnosed children with severe prediagnosis behavioral problems, yielding comparable future teacher-rated school behaviors as undiagnosed matches. However, diagnosed and medicated children with mild prediagnosis behavioral problems exhibit poorer future teacher-rated social and academic behaviors than their undiagnosed matches, consistent with labeling theory.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74089541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-28DOI: 10.1177/0038040720908173
Janice Aurini, Rod Missaghian, Roger Pizarro Milian
This article draws from American research on ‘‘concerted cultivation’’ to compare the parenting logics of 41 upper-middle-class parents in Toronto, Canada. We consider not only how parents structure their children’s after-school time (what parents do) but also how the broader ecology of schooling informs their parenting logics (how they rationalize their actions). We find that parenting practices mirror American research. Upper-middle-class families enroll their children in multiple lessons and cultivate their children’s skills. However, unlike their American counterparts, Canadian parenting logics are not explicitly stratification oriented, guided by a desire to access elite universities. Canada’s relatively flat stratification system of higher education, where prestige differences between universities are minimal, prompts the emergence of a more expressive parenting ethos. Our findings draw attention to the macrofoundations of social behavior by articulating the connection between parenting logics and educational status hierarchies. We conclude by considering the implications of cross-national differences to theories of parenting and social stratification.
{"title":"Educational Status Hierarchies, After-School Activities, and Parenting Logics: Lessons from Canada","authors":"Janice Aurini, Rod Missaghian, Roger Pizarro Milian","doi":"10.1177/0038040720908173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720908173","url":null,"abstract":"This article draws from American research on ‘‘concerted cultivation’’ to compare the parenting logics of 41 upper-middle-class parents in Toronto, Canada. We consider not only how parents structure their children’s after-school time (what parents do) but also how the broader ecology of schooling informs their parenting logics (how they rationalize their actions). We find that parenting practices mirror American research. Upper-middle-class families enroll their children in multiple lessons and cultivate their children’s skills. However, unlike their American counterparts, Canadian parenting logics are not explicitly stratification oriented, guided by a desire to access elite universities. Canada’s relatively flat stratification system of higher education, where prestige differences between universities are minimal, prompts the emergence of a more expressive parenting ethos. Our findings draw attention to the macrofoundations of social behavior by articulating the connection between parenting logics and educational status hierarchies. We conclude by considering the implications of cross-national differences to theories of parenting and social stratification.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91376726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-04DOI: 10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1294
I. K. Arsana
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari keterampilan mengajar guru dan fasilitas belajar terhadap motivasi belajar siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 77 responden ditarik menggunakan teknik random sampling. Data dikumpulkan dengan kuesioner yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kedua variabel bebas baik secara parsial maupun secara simultan memberikan dampak yang positif dan signifikan dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa. Namun, jika dilihat dari nilai determinasi parsial maka variabel keterampilan mengajar guru memiliki pengaruh yang lebih dominan dalam menumbuhkan motivasi belajar siswa. Hal ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa semakin kreatif dan inovatif guru dalam mengajar semakin membuat siswa tertarik atau termotivasi dalam belajar. Akan tetapi, tidak bisa dipungkiri bahwa fasilitas belajar juga memiliki andil dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar sebab fasilitas belajar merupakan faktor penunjang yang sangat dibutuhkan didalam proses belajar.
{"title":"PENGARUH KETERAMPILAN MENGAJAR GURU DAN FASILITAS BELAJAR TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA","authors":"I. K. Arsana","doi":"10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1294","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1294","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari keterampilan mengajar guru dan fasilitas belajar terhadap motivasi belajar siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 77 responden ditarik menggunakan teknik random sampling. Data dikumpulkan dengan kuesioner yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kedua variabel bebas baik secara parsial maupun secara simultan memberikan dampak yang positif dan signifikan dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa. Namun, jika dilihat dari nilai determinasi parsial maka variabel keterampilan mengajar guru memiliki pengaruh yang lebih dominan dalam menumbuhkan motivasi belajar siswa. Hal ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa semakin kreatif dan inovatif guru dalam mengajar semakin membuat siswa tertarik atau termotivasi dalam belajar. Akan tetapi, tidak bisa dipungkiri bahwa fasilitas belajar juga memiliki andil dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar sebab fasilitas belajar merupakan faktor penunjang yang sangat dibutuhkan didalam proses belajar.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77914775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-04DOI: 10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1245
Ainul Zulqoifah Asmawati, D. Purnama, Waspodo Waspodo
Penggunaan media sosial yang semakin populer saat ini memperbesar terjadinya perilaku cyberbullying dikalangan mahasiswa sebagai pengguna aktif media sosial, oleh karena itu untuk melakukan pencegahan sedini mungkin perlu dilakukan kajian ilmiah untuk menganalisis perilaku cyberbullying dengan melihat kemungkinan faktor penyebabnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kontrol sosial internal mahasiswa dan menganalisis pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku cyberbullying mahasiswa di Kota Palembang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan pendekatan ex-post facto . Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa tingkat kontrol sosial internal mahasiswa tergolong tinggi atau kuat. Kontrol sosial melalui ikatan sosial yang terjalin antara mahasiswa dengan keluarga dan universitas berpengaruh secara negatif dan signifikan terhadap perilaku cyberbullying dengan nilai t-hitung -3,664dan nilai signifikasi 0,000.
{"title":"TINGKAT KONTROL SOSIAL INTERNAL MAHASISWA TERHADAP PERILAKU CYBERBULLYING DI MEDIA SOSIAL","authors":"Ainul Zulqoifah Asmawati, D. Purnama, Waspodo Waspodo","doi":"10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1245","url":null,"abstract":"Penggunaan media sosial yang semakin populer saat ini memperbesar terjadinya perilaku cyberbullying dikalangan mahasiswa sebagai pengguna aktif media sosial, oleh karena itu untuk melakukan pencegahan sedini mungkin perlu dilakukan kajian ilmiah untuk menganalisis perilaku cyberbullying dengan melihat kemungkinan faktor penyebabnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kontrol sosial internal mahasiswa dan menganalisis pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku cyberbullying mahasiswa di Kota Palembang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan pendekatan ex-post facto . Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa tingkat kontrol sosial internal mahasiswa tergolong tinggi atau kuat. Kontrol sosial melalui ikatan sosial yang terjalin antara mahasiswa dengan keluarga dan universitas berpengaruh secara negatif dan signifikan terhadap perilaku cyberbullying dengan nilai t-hitung -3,664dan nilai signifikasi 0,000.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88008575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-04DOI: 10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1153
Lany Kusbudiyanto, A. Munandar
Permasalahan siswa putus sekolah merupakan masalah pendidikan nasional yang masih terjadi di Indonesia. Fenomena tingkat siswa putus sekolah pada jenjang Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) di Kota Bekasi masih terbilang tinggi, hal tersebut dapat dipengaruhi oleh banyak faktor. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini adalah pertama, menganalisis perbandingan siswa putus sekolah dengan siswa yang aktif terhadap faktor demografi, karakteristik sekolah dan sosio ekonomi keluarga. Kedua, menganalisis peluang faktor demografi, karakteristik sekolah, sosio ekonomi keluarga dalam mempengaruhi tingkat siswa putus sekolah. Metode yang digunakan yaitu uji komparatif dan regresi logistik. Hasil uji komparatif menunjukan terdapat perbedaan yang nyata atau signifikan antara siswa putus sekolah dengan siswa yang aktif jenjang Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) di Kota Bekasi pada variabel jenis kelamin, jumlah anggota keluarga, usia, jenis sekolah, rasio guru dan murid, jurusan, pendapatan keluarga dan pendidikan ibu. Hasil uji regresi logistik menunjukan variabel yang mempunyai peluang terjadinya siswa putus sekolah dan besarnya peluang dilihat dari nilai odds ratio (OR) yaitu pada variabel jenis kelamin sebesar 0,512, jumlah anggota keluarga sebesar 3,048, usia sebesar 29,156, jenis sekolah sebesar 0,476, rasio guru dan murid sebesar 38,498, pendapatan keluarga sebesar 0,074 dan pendidikan ibu sebesar 0,493.
{"title":"KARAKTERISTIK SISWA PUTUS SEKOLAH PADA JENJANG SEKOLAH MENENGAH KEJURUAN (SMK) DI KOTA BEKASI","authors":"Lany Kusbudiyanto, A. Munandar","doi":"10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1153","url":null,"abstract":"Permasalahan siswa putus sekolah merupakan masalah pendidikan nasional yang masih terjadi di Indonesia. Fenomena tingkat siswa putus sekolah pada jenjang Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) di Kota Bekasi masih terbilang tinggi, hal tersebut dapat dipengaruhi oleh banyak faktor. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini adalah pertama, menganalisis perbandingan siswa putus sekolah dengan siswa yang aktif terhadap faktor demografi, karakteristik sekolah dan sosio ekonomi keluarga. Kedua, menganalisis peluang faktor demografi, karakteristik sekolah, sosio ekonomi keluarga dalam mempengaruhi tingkat siswa putus sekolah. Metode yang digunakan yaitu uji komparatif dan regresi logistik. Hasil uji komparatif menunjukan terdapat perbedaan yang nyata atau signifikan antara siswa putus sekolah dengan siswa yang aktif jenjang Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) di Kota Bekasi pada variabel jenis kelamin, jumlah anggota keluarga, usia, jenis sekolah, rasio guru dan murid, jurusan, pendapatan keluarga dan pendidikan ibu. Hasil uji regresi logistik menunjukan variabel yang mempunyai peluang terjadinya siswa putus sekolah dan besarnya peluang dilihat dari nilai odds ratio (OR) yaitu pada variabel jenis kelamin sebesar 0,512, jumlah anggota keluarga sebesar 3,048, usia sebesar 29,156, jenis sekolah sebesar 0,476, rasio guru dan murid sebesar 38,498, pendapatan keluarga sebesar 0,074 dan pendidikan ibu sebesar 0,493.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85744923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-02-04DOI: 10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1110
Tika Melinda, Nuni Wahyuni, Surya Handoko, Sulis Safitri, Nurul Zakhra Utami, Ikhwan Noor Yusfiansyah, Febrian Adhira Riyadi Putro
Asuransi adalah suatu institusi yang direncanakan guna menangani risiko. Asuransi kesehatan memiliki fungsi penting dalam memberikan jaminan kesehatan yang menyeluruh bagi rakyat Indonesia agar penduduk Indonesia dapat hidup sehat, produktif, dan sejahtera. Pengetahuan masyarakat tentang asuransi kesehatan berpengaruh terhadap tingkat sosial ekonomi seperti pendidikan, pekerjaan dan pendapatan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif dan populasi penelitian adalah masyarakat Desa Kebumen, Banyubiru, Semarang dengan jumlah sampel 320 orang. Metode analisis yang digunakan analisis multivariat dengan tingkat signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukan 52% masyarakat sudah memiliki asuransi kesehatan serta nilai pada uji regresi linier berganda p-value 0,000 yang artinya ada pengaruh sosial ekonomi dengan kepemilikan asuransi kesehatan.
{"title":"PENGARUH SOSIAL EKONOMI TERHADAP KEPEMILIKAN ASURANSI KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT DESA KEBUMEN KECAMATAN BANYUBIRU KABUPATEN SEMARANG","authors":"Tika Melinda, Nuni Wahyuni, Surya Handoko, Sulis Safitri, Nurul Zakhra Utami, Ikhwan Noor Yusfiansyah, Febrian Adhira Riyadi Putro","doi":"10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31571/SOSIAL.V6I2.1110","url":null,"abstract":"Asuransi adalah suatu institusi yang direncanakan guna menangani risiko. Asuransi kesehatan memiliki fungsi penting dalam memberikan jaminan kesehatan yang menyeluruh bagi rakyat Indonesia agar penduduk Indonesia dapat hidup sehat, produktif, dan sejahtera. Pengetahuan masyarakat tentang asuransi kesehatan berpengaruh terhadap tingkat sosial ekonomi seperti pendidikan, pekerjaan dan pendapatan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif dan populasi penelitian adalah masyarakat Desa Kebumen, Banyubiru, Semarang dengan jumlah sampel 320 orang. Metode analisis yang digunakan analisis multivariat dengan tingkat signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukan 52% masyarakat sudah memiliki asuransi kesehatan serta nilai pada uji regresi linier berganda p-value 0,000 yang artinya ada pengaruh sosial ekonomi dengan kepemilikan asuransi kesehatan.","PeriodicalId":51398,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83456537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：