首页 > 最新文献

Assistive Technology最新文献

英文 中文
My assistive technology outcomes framework: rights-based outcome tools for consumers to 'measure what matters'. 我的辅助技术成果框架:为消费者提供基于权利的成果工具,以 "衡量重要的东西"。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2023.2229891
Natasha Layton, L Callaway, E Wilson, D Bell, M Prain, M Noonan, A Volkert, E Doyle

AT outcomes research is the systematic investigation of changes produced by AT in the lives of AT users and their environments. In contrast to focal outcome measures, My Assistive Technology Outcomes Framework (MyATOF) envisions an alternative starting point, co-designing a holistic and evidence-based set of outcome dimensions enabling AT users to quantify their own outcomes. International classification systems, research evidence, regulatory and service delivery frameworks underpin six optional tools: supports, outcomes, costs, rights, service delivery pathway and customer experience. Designed to empower the consumer-as-researcher and self-advocate, MyATOF has the potential to fill an identified gap in policy-relevant, consumer-focussed and consumer-directed outcome measurement in Australia and internationally. This paper presents the need for consumer-focussed measurement and articulates the conceptual foundations of MyATOF. The iterative development and results of MyATOF use-cases collected to date are presented. The paper concludes with next steps in using the Framework internationally, as well as its future development.

辅助技术成果研究是对辅助技术给辅助技术使用者的生活及其环境带来的变化进行的系统调查。与重点成果衡量标准不同,"我的辅助技术成果框架"(My Assistive Technology Outcomes Framework,MyATOF)设想了另一个出发点,即共同设计一套全面的、以证据为基础的成果维度,使辅助器具使用者能够量化自己的成果。国际分类系统、研究证据、监管和服务提供框架是六个可选工具的基础:支持、成果、成本、权利、服务提供途径和客户体验。MyATOF 的设计目的是增强消费者作为研究者和自我倡导者的能力,有可能填补澳大利亚和国际上在与政策相关、以消费者为中心和以消费者为导向的成果衡量方面的空白。本文介绍了以消费者为中心的测量需求,并阐明了 MyATOF 的概念基础。本文还介绍了迄今为止收集的 MyATOF 使用案例的迭代发展和结果。本文最后介绍了在国际上使用该框架的下一步措施及其未来发展。
{"title":"My assistive technology outcomes framework: rights-based outcome tools for consumers to 'measure what matters'.","authors":"Natasha Layton, L Callaway, E Wilson, D Bell, M Prain, M Noonan, A Volkert, E Doyle","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2023.2229891","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10400435.2023.2229891","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AT outcomes research is the systematic investigation of changes produced by AT in the lives of AT users and their environments. In contrast to focal outcome measures, My Assistive Technology Outcomes Framework (MyATOF) envisions an alternative starting point, co-designing a holistic and evidence-based set of outcome dimensions enabling AT users to quantify their own outcomes. International classification systems, research evidence, regulatory and service delivery frameworks underpin six optional tools: supports, outcomes, costs, rights, service delivery pathway and customer experience. Designed to empower the consumer-as-researcher and self-advocate, MyATOF has the potential to fill an identified gap in policy-relevant, consumer-focussed and consumer-directed outcome measurement in Australia and internationally. This paper presents the need for consumer-focussed measurement and articulates the conceptual foundations of MyATOF. The iterative development and results of MyATOF use-cases collected to date are presented. The paper concludes with next steps in using the Framework internationally, as well as its future development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9829097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A descriptive analysis of wheelchair repair registry data. 轮椅维修登记资料的描述性分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2044407
Alexandria M James, Gede Pramana, Richard M Schein, Anand Mhatre, Jonathan Pearlman, Matthew Macpherson, Mark R Schmeler

Wheeled mobility and seating (WMS) devices allow users to achieve greater mobility independence. Previous studies determined that 53% of wheelchair users required one or more repairs over a 6-month period; however, there are a limited number of studies that have evaluated types of repairs. The purpose of this study was to describe the types of manual wheelchair, power wheelchair, and scooter repairs within the Wheelchair Repair Registry (WRR) and examine the association between WMS devices and the frequency of repairs. A dataset of 4,645 devices distributed in the United States was collected from equipment suppliers who performed and logged community-based wheelchair repair services. The results demonstrated common repairs found across devices were within the wheels/tires/forks and batteries/cables categories. Device type was the most significant predictor of variance in the number of repairs. Customizable manual wheelchairs, tilt-in-space, Groups 2 & 3 power wheelchairs, and scooters were associated with higher number of repairs compared to non-customizable manual wheelchairs, pediatric, heavy-duty manual wheelchairs, and Group 4 power wheelchairs. The higher failure rate found in specific devices may be associated with a population of more active users, environment/conditions where equipment is used, time spent in equipment, additional features on device, or lower durability.

轮式移动和座椅(WMS)设备允许用户实现更大的移动独立性。先前的研究表明,53%的轮椅使用者在6个月内需要一次或多次维修;然而,评估修复类型的研究数量有限。本研究的目的是描述轮椅维修登记(WRR)中手动轮椅、电动轮椅和踏板车维修的类型,并检查WMS设备与维修频率之间的关系。在美国分布的4,645个设备的数据集是从设备供应商那里收集的,这些设备供应商提供并记录了社区轮椅维修服务。结果显示,在所有设备中发现的常见维修是在车轮/轮胎/叉和电池/电缆类别中。器械类型是修复次数方差的最显著预测因子。与不可定制的手动轮椅、儿科、重型手动轮椅和第4组电动轮椅相比,可定制的手动轮椅、空间倾斜、第2组和第3组电动轮椅和踏板车的维修次数更高。在特定设备中发现的较高故障率可能与更活跃的用户群体,设备使用的环境/条件,设备上花费的时间,设备上的附加功能或较低的耐用性有关。
{"title":"A descriptive analysis of wheelchair repair registry data.","authors":"Alexandria M James,&nbsp;Gede Pramana,&nbsp;Richard M Schein,&nbsp;Anand Mhatre,&nbsp;Jonathan Pearlman,&nbsp;Matthew Macpherson,&nbsp;Mark R Schmeler","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2044407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2044407","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wheeled mobility and seating (WMS) devices allow users to achieve greater mobility independence. Previous studies determined that 53% of wheelchair users required one or more repairs over a 6-month period; however, there are a limited number of studies that have evaluated types of repairs. The purpose of this study was to describe the types of manual wheelchair, power wheelchair, and scooter repairs within the Wheelchair Repair Registry (WRR) and examine the association between WMS devices and the frequency of repairs. A dataset of 4,645 devices distributed in the United States was collected from equipment suppliers who performed and logged community-based wheelchair repair services. The results demonstrated common repairs found across devices were within the wheels/tires/forks and batteries/cables categories. Device type was the most significant predictor of variance in the number of repairs. Customizable manual wheelchairs, tilt-in-space, Groups 2 & 3 power wheelchairs, and scooters were associated with higher number of repairs compared to non-customizable manual wheelchairs, pediatric, heavy-duty manual wheelchairs, and Group 4 power wheelchairs. The higher failure rate found in specific devices may be associated with a population of more active users, environment/conditions where equipment is used, time spent in equipment, additional features on device, or lower durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10018277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Interaction between people with dysarthria and speech recognition systems: A review. 构音障碍患者与语音识别系统之间的相互作用:综述。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 Epub Date: 2022-04-18 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2061085
Aisha Jaddoh, Fernando Loizides, Omer Rana

In recent years, rapid advancements have taken place for automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems and devices. Though ASR technologies have increased, the accessibility of these novel interaction systems is underreported and may present difficulties for people with speech impediments. In this article, we attempt to identify gaps in current research on the interaction between people with dysarthria and ASR systems and devices. We cover the period from 2011, when Siri (the first and the leading commercial voice assistant) was launched, to 2020. The review employs an interaction framework in which each element (user, input, system, and output) contributes to the interaction process. To select the articles for review, we conducted a search of scientific databases and academic journals. A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria, which included use of the word error rate (WER) as a measurement for evaluating ASR systems. This review determines that challenges in interacting with ASR systems persist even in light of the most recent commercial technologies. Further, understanding of the entire interaction process remains limited; thus, to improve this interaction, the recent progress of ASR systems must be elucidated.

近年来,自动语音识别(ASR)系统和设备取得了快速发展。尽管ASR技术有所增加,但这些新型交互系统的可访问性却被低估了,这可能会给有语言障碍的人带来困难。在这篇文章中,我们试图找出目前关于构音障碍患者与ASR系统和设备之间相互作用的研究中的空白。我们涵盖了从2011年Siri(第一款也是领先的商业语音助手)推出到2020年的这段时间。评审采用了一个交互框架,其中每个元素(用户、输入、系统和输出)都有助于交互过程。为了选择要审查的文章,我们搜索了科学数据库和学术期刊。共有36项研究符合纳入标准,其中包括使用单词错误率(WER)作为评估ASR系统的衡量标准。这篇综述确定,即使考虑到最新的商业技术,与ASR系统交互的挑战仍然存在。此外,对整个互动过程的了解仍然有限;因此,为了改善这种相互作用,必须阐明ASR系统的最新进展。
{"title":"Interaction between people with dysarthria and speech recognition systems: A review.","authors":"Aisha Jaddoh,&nbsp;Fernando Loizides,&nbsp;Omer Rana","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2061085","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2061085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, rapid advancements have taken place for automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems and devices. Though ASR technologies have increased, the accessibility of these novel interaction systems is underreported and may present difficulties for people with speech impediments. In this article, we attempt to identify gaps in current research on the interaction between people with dysarthria and ASR systems and devices. We cover the period from 2011, when Siri (the first and the leading commercial voice assistant) was launched, to 2020. The review employs an interaction framework in which each element (user, input, system, and output) contributes to the interaction process. To select the articles for review, we conducted a search of scientific databases and academic journals. A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria, which included use of the word error rate (WER) as a measurement for evaluating ASR systems. This review determines that challenges in interacting with ASR systems persist even in light of the most recent commercial technologies. Further, understanding of the entire interaction process remains limited; thus, to improve this interaction, the recent progress of ASR systems must be elucidated.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9973444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The association of the localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use in male veterans with transtibial amputation. 退伍军人残肢局部疼痛敏感性与义肢使用的关系。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2079763
Kamiar Ghoseiri, Mohammad Yusuf Rastkhadiv, Mostafa Allami, Phillip Page, Lars L Andersen, Duane C Button

The association of localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use has clinical implications, however, rarely been assessed. This study aimed to investigate pain sensitivity and explore its range, variability, and association with prosthesis use alongside other demographic and clinical characteristics of veterans with transtibial amputation. Pain sensitivity was determined as pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pressure tolerance (PT) in 19 male veterans with a mean age of 49.5 years using pressure algometry at 12 anatomical locations on‎ the residual limb. A comparison of pain sensitivity at each location, and among anatomical locations and participants was explored using independent t-test, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. Pain sensitivity range (PSR), the difference between PT and PPT, was significantly different (p < 0.05) at mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and the distal end of the tibia. The lowest PPT and PT (20.5 and 33 Ncm-2, p = 0.13) were recorded at the distal end of the residual limb, and the highest PPT and PT (73.4 and 94.3 Ncm-2, p = 0.03) were recorded at the mid-patellar tendon. Pain sensitivity was significantly different among anatomical locations and participants. The correlation tests (Pearson and partial eta squared) showed non-significant associations of pain sensitivity with participants' demographic and clinical characteristics except for daily prosthesis use. The mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and distal end of the tibia revealed the lowest pain hypersensitivity ‎due to higher PSR. Longer daily prosthesis use was associated with increased pain sensitivity.

残肢局部疼痛敏感性与义肢使用的关联具有临床意义,但很少被评估。本研究旨在调查退伍军人的疼痛敏感性,并探讨其范围、变异性以及与假体使用以及其他人口统计学和临床特征的关系。对19例平均年龄49.5岁的男性退伍军人残肢12个解剖位置采用压力测量法测定其疼痛敏感性为压力痛阈值(PPT)和压力耐受性(PT)。分别采用独立t检验、方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验对各部位、解剖部位和参与者的疼痛敏感性进行比较。疼痛敏感范围(PSR), PT和PPT的差异,在髌中肌腱、胫骨内侧耀斑和胫骨远端有显著差异(p 0.05)。残肢远端PPT和PT最低(20.5和33 Ncm-2, p = 0.13),髌中肌腱PPT和PT最高(73.4和94.3 Ncm-2, p = 0.03)。不同解剖部位和参与者的疼痛敏感性有显著差异。相关检验(Pearson和偏eta平方)显示,除日常义肢使用外,疼痛敏感性与受试者的人口学和临床特征无显著相关性。髌中肌腱、胫骨内侧耀斑和胫骨远端显示,由于较高的PSR,疼痛超敏反应最低。每天更长时间的假体使用与疼痛敏感性增加有关。
{"title":"The association of the localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use in male veterans with transtibial amputation.","authors":"Kamiar Ghoseiri,&nbsp;Mohammad Yusuf Rastkhadiv,&nbsp;Mostafa Allami,&nbsp;Phillip Page,&nbsp;Lars L Andersen,&nbsp;Duane C Button","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2079763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2079763","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association of localized pain sensitivity in the residual limb and prosthesis use has clinical implications, however, rarely been assessed. This study aimed to investigate pain sensitivity and explore its range, variability, and association with prosthesis use alongside other demographic and clinical characteristics of veterans with transtibial amputation. Pain sensitivity was determined as pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pressure tolerance (PT) in 19 male veterans with a mean age of 49.5 years using pressure algometry at 12 anatomical locations on‎ the residual limb. A comparison of pain sensitivity at each location, and among anatomical locations and participants was explored using independent <i>t</i>-test, analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. Pain sensitivity range (PSR), the difference between PT and PPT, was significantly different (<i>p <</i> 0.05) at mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and the distal end of the tibia. The lowest PPT and PT (20.5 and 33 Ncm<sup>-2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.13) were recorded at the distal end of the residual limb, and the highest PPT and PT (73.4 and 94.3 Ncm<sup>-2</sup>, <i>p =</i> 0.03) were recorded at the mid-patellar tendon. Pain sensitivity was significantly different among anatomical locations and participants. The correlation tests (Pearson and partial eta squared) showed non-significant associations of pain sensitivity with participants' demographic and clinical characteristics except for daily prosthesis use. The mid-patellar tendon, medial tibial flare, and distal end of the tibia revealed the lowest pain hypersensitivity ‎due to higher PSR. Longer daily prosthesis use was associated with increased pain sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10013386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Animation in AAC: Previous research, a sample of current availability in the United States, and future research potential. 动画在AAC:以前的研究,目前在美国的可用性样本,和未来的研究潜力。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2043954
Bethany Frick, Jamie B Boster, Skylar Thompson

Animation has been studied in the augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) literature regarding increasing transparency of symbols and decreasing operational demands of the interface design. This study investigated a sample of AAC devices to determine the presence and purpose of animation in the systems. We found that the majority of the animation found on AAC devices serve the function of providing feedback to the user. Future exploration of the use of animation in AAC through capitalizing on previous research, new technology, and as a method to foster linguistic and operational competence are considered. Clinical and research implications of these findings are discussed.

动画在增强和替代通信(AAC)文献中被研究,以增加符号的透明度和减少界面设计的操作需求。本研究调查了AAC设备的样本,以确定动画在系统中的存在和目的。我们发现AAC设备上的大多数动画都是为用户提供反馈的功能。未来的探索,通过利用以往的研究,新技术,并作为一种方法来培养语言和操作能力的动画在AAC的使用。讨论了这些发现的临床和研究意义。
{"title":"Animation in AAC: Previous research, a sample of current availability in the United States, and future research potential.","authors":"Bethany Frick,&nbsp;Jamie B Boster,&nbsp;Skylar Thompson","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2043954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2043954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animation has been studied in the augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) literature regarding increasing transparency of symbols and decreasing operational demands of the interface design. This study investigated a sample of AAC devices to determine the presence and purpose of animation in the systems. We found that the majority of the animation found on AAC devices serve the function of providing feedback to the user. Future exploration of the use of animation in AAC through capitalizing on previous research, new technology, and as a method to foster linguistic and operational competence are considered. Clinical and research implications of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10018279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Care robot research and development plan for disability and aged care in Korea: A mixed-methods user participation study. 韩国残障和老年护理机器人研发计划:一项混合方法的用户参与研究。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2038307
Myung-Joon Lim, Won-Kyung Song, Hyosun Kweon, Eun-Rae Ro

The population of Korea is aging rapidly, and this has led to a care burden for caregivers. Without adequate caregivers to address the increased burden, people with significant disabilities and older adults with disabilities who have greatly reduced mobility are at risk. The aim of this study was to determine suitable types of care robots for care applications in Korea and formulate a strategy for a future care robot R&D plan through a user participation study. We categorized nine types of care robots that are suitable for the care needs in Korea. By adopting a mixed research methodology involving user participation, we conducted discussions with caregivers, care receivers, and other stakeholders under a public-private-people partnership model. We also identified five primary strategies for care robot R&D: (1) intensive investment to match the needs of people with very severe disabilities to care robot technologies, particularly for transfer, repositioning, toileting, and feeding; (2) translational research and technology development; (3) realization of smart-care through fourth industrial revolution (i.e., digital) technologies; (4) user-centered research with stakeholders; and (5) building of a care robot ecosystem. The formulated plan would be shared with other developers and clinical experts to drive development of suitable care robots.

韩国人口老龄化迅速,这给照顾者带来了照顾负担。如果没有足够的护理人员来处理日益增加的负担,严重残疾者和行动能力大大降低的残疾老年人将面临风险。本研究的目的是通过用户参与研究,确定适合韩国护理应用的护理机器人类型,并制定未来护理机器人研发计划的策略。我们将适合韩国护理需求的九种护理机器人进行了分类。通过采用涉及用户参与的混合研究方法,我们在公私伙伴关系模式下与护理人员、护理接受者和其他利益相关者进行了讨论。我们还确定了护理机器人研发的五个主要策略:(1)加大投入,以满足重度残疾人对护理机器人技术的需求,特别是在转移、重新定位、如厕和喂食方面;(2)转化研究和技术开发;(3)通过第四次工业革命(即数字)技术实现智能医疗;(4)与利益相关者进行以用户为中心的研究;(5)护理机器人生态系统的构建。制定的计划将与其他开发人员和临床专家共享,以推动合适护理机器人的开发。
{"title":"Care robot research and development plan for disability and aged care in Korea: A mixed-methods user participation study.","authors":"Myung-Joon Lim,&nbsp;Won-Kyung Song,&nbsp;Hyosun Kweon,&nbsp;Eun-Rae Ro","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2038307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2038307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The population of Korea is aging rapidly, and this has led to a care burden for caregivers. Without adequate caregivers to address the increased burden, people with significant disabilities and older adults with disabilities who have greatly reduced mobility are at risk. The aim of this study was to determine suitable types of care robots for care applications in Korea and formulate a strategy for a future care robot R&D plan through a user participation study. We categorized nine types of care robots that are suitable for the care needs in Korea. By adopting a mixed research methodology involving user participation, we conducted discussions with caregivers, care receivers, and other stakeholders under a public-private-people partnership model. We also identified five primary strategies for care robot R&D: (1) intensive investment to match the needs of people with very severe disabilities to care robot technologies, particularly for transfer, repositioning, toileting, and feeding; (2) translational research and technology development; (3) realization of smart-care through fourth industrial revolution (i.e., digital) technologies; (4) user-centered research with stakeholders; and (5) building of a care robot ecosystem. The formulated plan would be shared with other developers and clinical experts to drive development of suitable care robots.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10007089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Evaluation of a smart home platform for adults with Down syndrome. 唐氏综合症成人智能家居平台的评估。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2075487
Audrey Landuran, Hélène Sauzéon, Charles Consel, Bernard N'Kaoua

People with Down syndrome (DS) encounter difficulties in their daily lives. In recent years, smart homes have provided some answers to the problem of residential autonomy. In fact, smart homes can provide support for complex routines and activities, while adjusting to the person's behaviors and needs and offering maximum control of the environment. In this context, the objectives of this study were to assess (i) the usability of the smart home platform as well as (ii) the impact of the use (for 6 months) of this platform by adults with DS on many dimensions such as residential autonomy, projection into the future, the development of a life plan, self-determination, quality of life, self-esteem, anxiety, and psychological well-being. The first objective of a preliminary study was to verify that the support platform we use is suitable and can be used effectively by people with DS. For the preliminary study, the evaluations show effective, satisfactory and efficient use of all applications. Regarding the objective of our study, the evaluations show positive impacts on many dimensions such as living skills, self-determination, quality of life, self-esteem, anxiety and certain components of life psychological well-being.

唐氏综合症患者在日常生活中遇到困难。近年来,智能家居为住宅自治问题提供了一些答案。事实上,智能家居可以为复杂的日常生活和活动提供支持,同时根据人的行为和需求进行调整,并提供对环境的最大控制。在此背景下,本研究的目的是评估(i)智能家居平台的可用性,以及(ii)使用(6个月)该平台对DS成人在许多方面的影响,如居住自主性、对未来的预测、生活计划的发展、自决、生活质量、自尊、焦虑和心理健康。初步研究的第一个目的是验证我们使用的支持平台是否合适,是否可以被退行性痴呆患者有效地使用。在初步研究中,评价表明所有应用程序的使用是有效的、令人满意的和高效的。就我们的研究目标而言,这些评估在生活技能、自我决定、生活质量、自尊、焦虑和生活心理健康的某些组成部分等多个维度上都显示出积极的影响。
{"title":"Evaluation of a smart home platform for adults with Down syndrome.","authors":"Audrey Landuran,&nbsp;Hélène Sauzéon,&nbsp;Charles Consel,&nbsp;Bernard N'Kaoua","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2075487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2075487","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with Down syndrome (DS) encounter difficulties in their daily lives. In recent years, smart homes have provided some answers to the problem of residential autonomy. In fact, smart homes can provide support for complex routines and activities, while adjusting to the person's behaviors and needs and offering maximum control of the environment. In this context, the objectives of this study were to assess (i) the usability of the smart home platform as well as (ii) the impact of the use (for 6 months) of this platform by adults with DS on many dimensions such as residential autonomy, projection into the future, the development of a life plan, self-determination, quality of life, self-esteem, anxiety, and psychological well-being. The first objective of a preliminary study was to verify that the support platform we use is suitable and can be used effectively by people with DS. For the preliminary study, the evaluations show effective, satisfactory and efficient use of all applications. Regarding the objective of our study, the evaluations show positive impacts on many dimensions such as living skills, self-determination, quality of life, self-esteem, anxiety and certain components of life psychological well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10018744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The challenge of complexity: research quality in assistive technology. 复杂性的挑战:辅助技术的研究质量。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2023.2240212
Emma M Smith
The field of assistive technology is growing globally, thanks to increased investment in awareness and research from advocacy organizations, national and international non-governmental organizations, academic partners, and others. We are witnessing this growth and increased awareness in the increase in relevant research, resolution 71.8 on Improving Access to Assistive Technology at the World Health Assembly in 2018 (World Health Assembly, 2018), and the publication of the Global Report on Assistive Technology in 2022 from the World Health Organization and UNICEF (World Health Organization, 2022). With this growth comes an increased recognition of the need for high-quality research to support evidence-informed assistive product development, service delivery standards and processes, and improved public policy. The recent publication of the WHO Wheelchair Provision Guidelines (World Health Organization, 2023) highlights the challenge of limited highquality research to support many of the recommendations in the document, despite wheelchair research being one of the more developed areas of evidence in the field. Assessment of research quality in health-related fields has historically been based largely on the perceived strength of the methodology used to conduct the research, with considerations for how the research was carried out, and by whom. In general, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are perceived to be a higher quality of evidence when creating guidelines, while observational studies are perceived to be of lower quality of evidence. A variety of additional factors are considered in the critical appraisal of research which may further impact the perception of quality. We perceive systematic reviews and meta-analyses to provide the highest levels of evidence for decision-making. These levels of evidence are largely based on a medical model of research, and an assumption that an intervention may have a single causative effect on an outcome. However, in complex interventions, like assistive technology provision, adherence to this model of evidence quality is problematic. Assistive technology provision is multi-faceted, individualized, and contextual. Even an intervention that looks the same on the surface – the provision of a specific product to address a specific functional limitation – will vary significantly in its application. The person’s needs, preferences, and functional capacity, existing skillset of the person, the product and its personalized specifications, set-up of the product and training around its use, role of the service provider, support networks around the person, and social, physical, and institutional environments in which the product is used all will have an impact on the resulting outcomes. To measure and evaluate outcomes of any one of these is challenging. To address the potential contribution of each of them in the context of a controlled trial is nearly impossible. Furthermore, placebo-controlled trials are impossible
{"title":"The challenge of complexity: research quality in assistive technology.","authors":"Emma M Smith","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2023.2240212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2023.2240212","url":null,"abstract":"The field of assistive technology is growing globally, thanks to increased investment in awareness and research from advocacy organizations, national and international non-governmental organizations, academic partners, and others. We are witnessing this growth and increased awareness in the increase in relevant research, resolution 71.8 on Improving Access to Assistive Technology at the World Health Assembly in 2018 (World Health Assembly, 2018), and the publication of the Global Report on Assistive Technology in 2022 from the World Health Organization and UNICEF (World Health Organization, 2022). With this growth comes an increased recognition of the need for high-quality research to support evidence-informed assistive product development, service delivery standards and processes, and improved public policy. The recent publication of the WHO Wheelchair Provision Guidelines (World Health Organization, 2023) highlights the challenge of limited highquality research to support many of the recommendations in the document, despite wheelchair research being one of the more developed areas of evidence in the field. Assessment of research quality in health-related fields has historically been based largely on the perceived strength of the methodology used to conduct the research, with considerations for how the research was carried out, and by whom. In general, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are perceived to be a higher quality of evidence when creating guidelines, while observational studies are perceived to be of lower quality of evidence. A variety of additional factors are considered in the critical appraisal of research which may further impact the perception of quality. We perceive systematic reviews and meta-analyses to provide the highest levels of evidence for decision-making. These levels of evidence are largely based on a medical model of research, and an assumption that an intervention may have a single causative effect on an outcome. However, in complex interventions, like assistive technology provision, adherence to this model of evidence quality is problematic. Assistive technology provision is multi-faceted, individualized, and contextual. Even an intervention that looks the same on the surface – the provision of a specific product to address a specific functional limitation – will vary significantly in its application. The person’s needs, preferences, and functional capacity, existing skillset of the person, the product and its personalized specifications, set-up of the product and training around its use, role of the service provider, support networks around the person, and social, physical, and institutional environments in which the product is used all will have an impact on the resulting outcomes. To measure and evaluate outcomes of any one of these is challenging. To address the potential contribution of each of them in the context of a controlled trial is nearly impossible. Furthermore, placebo-controlled trials are impossible","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9982171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multi-modal access method (eye-tracking + switch-scanning) for individuals with severe motor impairment: A preliminary investigation. 多模态(眼动追踪+切换扫描)方法在重度运动障碍患者中的应用初探。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2053895
S K Fager, T Sorenson, E Jakobs, H Koester, T Jakobs, D R Beukelman

Individuals with severe motor impairments often require alternative means to access computers and communication technology. A range of alternative access devices exist; however, most rely on use of a single access modality. While this approach works for some individuals, it can be limiting for others. This study explored the use of a multi-modal prototype (eye-tracking + switch-scanning) on typing performance with a range of individuals with motor impairments. The multi-modal prototype was compared to eye-tracking alone for this study. Results indicated that the multi-modal prototype had significantly slower typing rate but significantly lower total errors compared to eye-tracking alone. Analysis of individual data revealed four subgroups of clinical relevance including individuals that 1) benefit from multi-modal, 2) benefit from eye-tracking, 3) demonstrate learning and 4) demonstrate fluctuating performance.

患有严重运动障碍的人通常需要其他方式来访问计算机和通信技术。存在一系列可供选择的接入设备;然而,大多数依赖于使用单一访问方式。虽然这种方法对某些人有效,但对其他人来说可能是有限的。本研究探索了多模态原型(眼动追踪+开关扫描)在一系列运动障碍患者打字表现上的应用。在这项研究中,将多模态原型与单独的眼动追踪进行了比较。结果表明,与单纯眼动追踪相比,多模态原型的打字速度显著降低,但总错误率显著降低。对个人数据的分析揭示了临床相关性的四个亚组,包括1)受益于多模态、2)受益于眼球追踪、3)表现出学习能力和4)表现出波动表现的个体。
{"title":"Multi-modal access method (eye-tracking + switch-scanning) for individuals with severe motor impairment: A preliminary investigation.","authors":"S K Fager,&nbsp;T Sorenson,&nbsp;E Jakobs,&nbsp;H Koester,&nbsp;T Jakobs,&nbsp;D R Beukelman","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2053895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2053895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with severe motor impairments often require alternative means to access computers and communication technology. A range of alternative access devices exist; however, most rely on use of a single access modality. While this approach works for some individuals, it can be limiting for others. This study explored the use of a multi-modal prototype (eye-tracking + switch-scanning) on typing performance with a range of individuals with motor impairments. The multi-modal prototype was compared to eye-tracking alone for this study. Results indicated that the multi-modal prototype had significantly slower typing rate but significantly lower total errors compared to eye-tracking alone. Analysis of individual data revealed four subgroups of clinical relevance including individuals that 1) benefit from multi-modal, 2) benefit from eye-tracking, 3) demonstrate learning and 4) demonstrate fluctuating performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576815/pdf/nihms-1802517.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10014379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
"Functioning better is doing better": older adults' priorities for the evaluation of assistive technology. “更好的功能就是做得更好”:老年人评估辅助技术的优先事项。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2113180
Katarzyna Kabacińska, Kim Vu, Mallorie Tam, Olivia Edwards, William C Miller, Julie M Robillard

Despite the benefits of assistive technology (AT), barriers to technology adoption still exist and are uniquely affecting older populations. Improving technology adoption can be achieved by involving end-users in the development and evaluation process. However, existing AT evaluation tools rarely take into account older adults' experiences. The goal of this study was to fill this gap by determining which AT evaluation criteria are important for older adults. We conducted 4 nominal group meetings with 21 participants aged 50+ in Vancouver, Canada. In the meetings, participants generated AT evaluation criteria and organized them in the order of importance. The content from the meetings was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Final rankings were collated to reveal which criteria were the most important across the groups. We found that promotion of independence, affordability, ease of use and ethics are the most important AT evaluation criteria for older adults. Some aspects of ATs that older adults value, such as reliability, are not featured in AT evaluation tools. This study provides insight into older adults' priorities for AT evaluation criteria, and concerns that older adults have about AT use. The findings are supplemented with a comprehensive analysis of the group discussions that contextualizes the criteria.

尽管辅助技术(AT)有好处,但采用技术的障碍仍然存在,而且对老年人口的影响最大。通过让最终用户参与开发和评价过程,可以改进技术的采用。然而,现有的AT评估工具很少考虑到老年人的经历。本研究的目的是通过确定哪些AT评估标准对老年人重要来填补这一空白。我们在加拿大温哥华进行了4次名义上的小组会议,共有21名年龄在50岁以上的参与者。在会议中,参与者产生AT评价标准,并按重要性排序。使用定性内容分析对会议内容进行分析。最终的排名经过整理,以揭示各组中哪些标准最重要。我们发现,促进独立性、可负担性、易用性和道德是老年人最重要的AT评价标准。老年人重视的一些方面,如可靠性,在评估工具中没有体现。本研究提供了老年人对AT评估标准的优先级,以及老年人对AT使用的关注。研究结果补充了对小组讨论的综合分析,将标准置于背景下。
{"title":"\"Functioning better is doing better\": older adults' priorities for the evaluation of assistive technology.","authors":"Katarzyna Kabacińska,&nbsp;Kim Vu,&nbsp;Mallorie Tam,&nbsp;Olivia Edwards,&nbsp;William C Miller,&nbsp;Julie M Robillard","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2022.2113180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2113180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the benefits of assistive technology (AT), barriers to technology adoption still exist and are uniquely affecting older populations. Improving technology adoption can be achieved by involving end-users in the development and evaluation process. However, existing AT evaluation tools rarely take into account older adults' experiences. The goal of this study was to fill this gap by determining which AT evaluation criteria are important for older adults. We conducted 4 nominal group meetings with 21 participants aged 50+ in Vancouver, Canada. In the meetings, participants generated AT evaluation criteria and organized them in the order of importance. The content from the meetings was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Final rankings were collated to reveal which criteria were the most important across the groups. We found that promotion of independence, affordability, ease of use and ethics are the most important AT evaluation criteria for older adults. Some aspects of ATs that older adults value, such as reliability, are not featured in AT evaluation tools. This study provides insight into older adults' priorities for AT evaluation criteria, and concerns that older adults have about AT use. The findings are supplemented with a comprehensive analysis of the group discussions that contextualizes the criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10016764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Assistive Technology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1