Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100925
Hamed Jalaeian MD, RPVI, MSc , David H. Field MD, MS , Emil I. Cohen MD, FSIR
Renal transplantation is the most commonly performed solid-organ allograft surgery; in 2021, 25487 kidneys were transplanted in the United States, and nearly 42,000 adult patients were listed for transplant. As the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, transplantation is performed at more than 250 centers. Despite a high rate of success, renal transplantation is not without complication, and the interventional radiologist plays a crucial role in the management of the postoperative patient. Knowledge of postsurgical anatomy, imaging findings, and technical challenges unique to these patients is important for the safe and effective treatment of transplant-related conditions. We offer a guide to the most common interventions in the renal transplant population, including biopsy, vascular interventions, and the management of urinary obstruction.
{"title":"Transplant Renal Interventions","authors":"Hamed Jalaeian MD, RPVI, MSc , David H. Field MD, MS , Emil I. Cohen MD, FSIR","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100925","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100925","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Renal transplantation is the most commonly performed solid-organ </span>allograft<span><span> surgery; in 2021, 25487 kidneys were transplanted in the United States, and nearly 42,000 adult patients were listed for transplant. As the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, transplantation is performed at more than 250 centers. Despite a high rate of success, renal transplantation is not without complication, and the interventional radiologist plays a crucial role in the management of the postoperative patient. Knowledge of postsurgical anatomy, imaging findings, and technical challenges unique to these patients is important for the safe and effective treatment of transplant-related conditions. We offer a guide to the most common interventions in the </span>renal transplant population, including biopsy, vascular interventions, and the management of </span></span>urinary obstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 4","pages":"Article 100925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136010079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100922
Denise J. Lo MD , Joseph F. Magliocca MD
Liver transplantation is a technically demanding surgical procedure with known complications, and the optimal approach to addressing vascular and biliary complications requires a coordinated effort between surgical and interventional radiology teams. Vascular complications involving the hepatic artery, portal vein, or hepatic veins can be characterized by their mechanism, chronicity, and timing of presentation. These factors help determine whether the optimal therapeutic approach is surgical or endovascular. Very early presentation in the perioperative period favors surgical revision, while later presentation is best addressed endovascularly. Biliary complications can be categorized as leaks or strictures, and coordinated surgical, endoscopic, and percutaneous management is needed to address these types of complications. Through advances in technique and the management of complications, outcomes after liver transplantation continue to improve.
{"title":"Surgical Versus Image-Guided Interventions in the Management of Complications After Liver Transplantation","authors":"Denise J. Lo MD , Joseph F. Magliocca MD","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100922","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100922","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Liver transplantation is a technically demanding surgical procedure with known complications, and the optimal approach to addressing vascular and biliary complications requires a coordinated effort between surgical and interventional radiology teams. Vascular complications involving the </span>hepatic artery, </span>portal vein<span>, or hepatic veins<span><span> can be characterized by their mechanism, chronicity, and timing of presentation. These factors help determine whether the optimal therapeutic approach is surgical or endovascular. Very early presentation in the </span>perioperative period favors surgical revision, while later presentation is best addressed endovascularly. Biliary complications can be categorized as leaks or strictures, and coordinated surgical, endoscopic, and percutaneous management is needed to address these types of complications. Through advances in technique and the management of complications, outcomes after liver transplantation continue to improve.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 4","pages":"Article 100922"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136010084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100923
Ziga Cizman MD, Wael Saad
Hepatic artery complications can be divided into 2 different categories, nonocclusive and steno-occlusive disease. Steno-occlusive disease is a collective term that encompasses hepatic artery thrombosis, hepatic artery stenosis, and hepatic arterial kinks, while nonocclusive arterial disease encompasses less than 5% of complications and is a collective term used to describe arteriovenous fistulae, pseudoaneurysms, arterial rupture and nonocclusive hepatic artery hypoperfusion syndrome. This article details the angiographic techniques and definitions needed to accurately diagnose arterial transplant complications and describes the technical aspects and results of endoluminal management of these arterial complications. In addition, this article discusses the presentation, etiology and indications for treatment, including surgical management of these various complications.
{"title":"Transplant Hepatic Artery Complications","authors":"Ziga Cizman MD, Wael Saad","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100923","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100923","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatic artery<span><span> complications can be divided into 2 different categories, nonocclusive and steno-occlusive disease. Steno-occlusive disease is a collective term that encompasses hepatic artery thrombosis, hepatic artery stenosis, and hepatic arterial kinks, while nonocclusive </span>arterial disease<span><span> encompasses less than 5% of complications and is a collective term used to describe arteriovenous fistulae, </span>pseudoaneurysms<span>, arterial rupture<span> and nonocclusive hepatic artery hypoperfusion syndrome. This article details the angiographic techniques and definitions needed to accurately diagnose arterial transplant complications and describes the technical aspects and results of endoluminal management of these arterial complications. In addition, this article discusses the presentation, etiology and indications for treatment, including surgical management of these various complications.</span></span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 4","pages":"Article 100923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135410388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100911
Anna M. Sorensen MD , Annie M. Zlevor BA , Meridith A. Kisting MA , Allison B. Couillard MD , Timothy J. Ziemlewicz MD , Giuseppe V. Toia MD, MS , J. Louis Hinshaw MD , Michael Woods MD , Lindsay M. Stratchko DO , Perry J. Pickhardt MD , Marcia L. Foltz RN , Walter W. Peppler PhD , Fred T. Lee Jr. MD , Erica M. Knavel Koepsel MD
CT navigation (CTN) has recently been developed to combine many of the advantages of conventional CT and CT-fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement. CTN systems display real-time needle position superimposed on a CT dataset. This is accomplished by placing electromagnetic (EM) or optical transmitters/sensors on the patient and needle, combined with fiducials placed within the scan field to superimpose a known needle location onto a CT dataset. Advantages of CTN include real-time needle tracking using a contemporaneous CT dataset with the patient in the treatment position, reduced radiation to the physician, facilitation of procedures outside the gantry plane, fewer helical scans during needle placement, and needle guidance based on diagnostic-quality CT datasets. Limitations include the display of a virtual (vs actual) needle position, which can be inaccurate if the needle bends, the fiducial moves, or patient movement occurs between scans, and limitations in anatomical regions with a high degree of motion such as the lung bases. This review summarizes recently introduced CTN technologies in comparison to historical methods of CT needle guidance. A “How I do it” section follows, which describes how CT navigation has been integrated into the study center for both routine and challenging procedures, and includes step-by-step explanations, technical tips, and pitfalls.
{"title":"CT Navigation for Percutaneous Needle Placement: How I Do It","authors":"Anna M. Sorensen MD , Annie M. Zlevor BA , Meridith A. Kisting MA , Allison B. Couillard MD , Timothy J. Ziemlewicz MD , Giuseppe V. Toia MD, MS , J. Louis Hinshaw MD , Michael Woods MD , Lindsay M. Stratchko DO , Perry J. Pickhardt MD , Marcia L. Foltz RN , Walter W. Peppler PhD , Fred T. Lee Jr. MD , Erica M. Knavel Koepsel MD","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100911","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100911","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CT navigation (CTN) has recently been developed to combine many of the advantages of conventional CT and CT-fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement. CTN systems display real-time needle position superimposed on a CT dataset. This is accomplished by placing electromagnetic (EM) or optical transmitters/sensors on the patient and needle, combined with fiducials placed within the scan field to superimpose a known needle location onto a CT dataset. Advantages of CTN include real-time needle tracking using a contemporaneous CT dataset with the patient in the treatment position, reduced radiation to the physician, facilitation of procedures outside the gantry plane, fewer helical scans during needle placement, and needle guidance based on diagnostic-quality CT datasets. Limitations include the display of a virtual (vs actual) needle position, which can be inaccurate if the needle bends, the fiducial moves, or patient movement occurs between scans, and limitations in anatomical regions with a high degree of motion such as the lung bases. This review summarizes recently introduced CTN technologies in comparison to historical methods of CT needle guidance. A “How I do it” section follows, which describes how CT navigation has been integrated into the study center for both routine and challenging procedures, and includes step-by-step explanations, technical tips, and pitfalls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 100911"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135965847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a prominent imaging modality in interventional radiology that offers real-time visualization and precise guidance in various procedures. This article aims to provide an overview of the techniques used to guide and monitor interventions that use CBCT. It discusses the advantages of CBCT, its current applications, and potential future CBCT-related developments in the field of interventional radiology.
{"title":"Perspectives of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Interventional Radiology: Techniques for Planning, Guidance, and Monitoring","authors":"Matthias Barral MD, PhD , Olivier Chevallier MD, PhD , Francois H. Cornelis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100912","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100912","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has emerged as a prominent imaging modality in interventional radiology that offers real-time visualization and precise guidance in various procedures. This article aims to provide an overview of the techniques used to guide and monitor interventions that use CBCT. It discusses the advantages of CBCT, its current applications, and potential future CBCT-related developments in the field of interventional radiology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 100912"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136010013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100919
Ahmed Elsakka , Brian J. Park , Brett Marinelli , Nathaniel C. Swinburne , Javin Schefflein
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented Reality (AR) are emerging technologies with the potential to revolutionize Interventional radiology (IR). These innovations offer advantages in patient care, interventional planning, and educational training by improving the visualization and navigation of medical images. Despite progress, several challenges hinder their widespread adoption, including limitations in navigation systems, cost, clinical acceptance, and technical constraints of AR/VR equipment. However, ongoing research holds promise with recent advancements such as shape-sensing needles and improved organ deformation modeling. The development of deep learning techniques, particularly for medical imaging segmentation, presents a promising avenue to address existing accuracy and precision issues. Future applications of AR/VR in IR include simulation-based training, preprocedural planning, intraprocedural guidance, and increased patient engagement. As these technologies advance, they are expected to facilitate telemedicine, enhance operational efficiency, and improve patient outcomes, marking a new frontier in interventional radiology.
{"title":"Virtual and Augmented Reality in Interventional Radiology: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions","authors":"Ahmed Elsakka , Brian J. Park , Brett Marinelli , Nathaniel C. Swinburne , Javin Schefflein","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100919","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100919","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Virtual reality (VR) and augmented Reality (AR) are emerging technologies with the potential to revolutionize Interventional radiology<span><span> (IR). These innovations offer advantages in patient care, interventional planning, and educational training by improving the visualization and navigation of medical images. Despite progress, several challenges hinder their widespread adoption, including limitations in navigation systems, cost, clinical acceptance, and technical constraints of AR/VR equipment. However, ongoing research holds promise with recent advancements such as shape-sensing needles and improved organ deformation modeling. The development of deep learning techniques, particularly for medical imaging segmentation, presents a promising avenue to address existing accuracy and precision issues. Future applications of AR/VR in IR include simulation-based training, preprocedural planning, intraprocedural guidance, and increased patient engagement. As these technologies advance, they are expected to facilitate </span>telemedicine, enhance operational efficiency, and improve patient outcomes, marking a new frontier in interventional radiology.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 100919"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135965846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100914
Moritz T. Winkelmann, Jens Kübler, Rüdiger Hoffmann
Magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance has demonstrated significant potential in the field of interventional radiology in several applications. This article covers the main points of MR-guided hepatic tumor ablation as a representative of MR-guided procedures. Patient selection and appropriate equipment utilization are essential for successful MR-guided tumor ablation. Intra-procedural planning imaging enables the visualization of the tumor and surrounding anatomical structures in most cases without the application of a contrast agent, ensuring optimal planning of the applicator tract. MRI enables real-time, multiplanar imaging, thus simultaneous observation of the applicator and target tumor is possible during targeting with adaptable slice angulations in case of challenging tumor positions. Typical ablation zone appearance during therapy monitoring with MRI enables safe assessment of the therapy result, resulting in a high primary efficacy rate. Recent advancements in ablation probes have shortened treatment times, while technical strategies address applicator visibility issues. MR-imaging immediately after the procedure is used to rule out complications and to assess technical success. Especially in smaller neoplasms, MRI-guided liver ablation demonstrates positive outcomes in terms of technical success rates, as well as promising survival and recurrence rates. Additionally, percutaneous biopsy under MR guidance offers an alternative to classic guidance modalities, providing high soft tissue contrast and thereby increasing the reliability of lesion detection, particularly in cases involving smaller lesions. Despite these advantages, the use of MR guidance in clinical routine is still limited to few indications and centers, due to by high costs, extended duration, and the need for specialized expertise. In conclusion, MRI-guided interventions could benefit from ongoing advancements in hardware, software, and devices. Such progress has the potential to expand diagnostic and treatment options in the field of interventional radiology.
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance-guided Procedures: Consensus on Rationale, Techniques, and Outcomes","authors":"Moritz T. Winkelmann, Jens Kübler, Rüdiger Hoffmann","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100914","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100914","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance has demonstrated significant potential in the field of </span>interventional radiology<span> in several applications. This article covers the main points of MR-guided hepatic tumor ablation<span> as a representative of MR-guided procedures. Patient selection and appropriate equipment utilization are essential for successful MR-guided tumor ablation. Intra-procedural planning imaging enables the visualization of the tumor and surrounding anatomical structures in most cases without the application of a contrast agent, ensuring optimal planning of the applicator tract. MRI enables real-time, multiplanar imaging, thus simultaneous observation of the applicator and target tumor is possible during targeting with adaptable slice </span></span></span>angulations<span> in case of challenging tumor positions. Typical ablation zone appearance during therapy monitoring with MRI enables safe assessment of the therapy result, resulting in a high primary efficacy rate. Recent advancements in ablation probes have shortened treatment<span> times, while technical strategies address applicator visibility issues. MR-imaging immediately after the procedure is used to rule out complications and to assess technical success. Especially in smaller neoplasms, MRI-guided liver ablation demonstrates positive outcomes in terms of technical success rates, as well as promising survival and recurrence rates. Additionally, percutaneous biopsy under MR guidance offers an alternative to classic guidance modalities, providing high soft tissue contrast and thereby increasing the reliability of lesion detection, particularly in cases involving smaller lesions. Despite these advantages, the use of MR guidance in clinical routine is still limited to few indications and centers, due to by high costs, extended duration, and the need for specialized expertise. In conclusion, MRI-guided interventions could benefit from ongoing advancements in hardware, software, and devices. Such progress has the potential to expand diagnostic and treatment options in the field of interventional radiology.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136009279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Endovascular robots have the potential to revolutionize the field of vascular interventions by enhancing procedural efficiency, accuracy, and standardization. They aim to reduce radiation exposure, as well as physical strain on operators and medical staff, while enabling precise navigation of catheters through challenging anatomical structures. However, the widespread adoption of these robots faces barriers, such as real estate constraints, setup time, limited range of compatible tools, and high costs. This paper discusses these barriers and highlights Hansen Medical's Magellan and the Liberty robotic systems as notable examples. New developments will offer cost-effective, intuitive, and disposable approaches to endovascular procedures. Despite challenges, endovascular robots hold promise for improving access to endovascular therapy and transforming patient care in various healthcare settings.
{"title":"Overcoming Barriers and Advancements in Endovascular Robotics: A Review of Systems and Developments","authors":"Eyal Morag MD , Francois H. Cornelis MD, PhD , Giora Weisz MD , Ripal Gandhi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100918","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100918","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Endovascular robots have the potential to revolutionize the field of vascular interventions by enhancing procedural efficiency, accuracy, and standardization. They aim to reduce radiation exposure, as well as physical strain on operators and medical staff, while enabling precise navigation of catheters through challenging anatomical structures. However, the widespread adoption of these robots faces barriers, such as real estate constraints, setup time, limited range of compatible tools, and high costs. This paper discusses these barriers and highlights Hansen Medical's Magellan and the Liberty robotic systems as notable examples. New developments will offer cost-effective, intuitive, and disposable approaches to endovascular procedures. Despite challenges, endovascular robots hold promise for improving access to endovascular therapy and transforming patient care in various healthcare settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 100918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136009391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100913
Gentry Russell , Benjamin S. Strnad , Daniel R. Ludwig , William D. Middleton , Malak Itani , Rachita Khot , Vincent Mellnick , Christopher Malone
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) uses intravenously injected gas microbubbles as a pure blood pool contrast agent to demonstrate blood flow and tissue perfusion at a much higher sensitivity than color Doppler and power Doppler ultrasound. CEUS has gained traction in abdominal diagnostic imaging for improved lesion detection and characterization and a complementary problem-solving tool to CT and MRI. In addition to its diagnostic applications, CEUS has also proven useful for pre-procedure planning, procedure guidance, and post-procedure evaluation. This review provides a practical overview and guides to the application of CEUS in percutaneous, ultrasound-guided, needle-driven procedures, focusing on 2 common procedures, which illustrate the many benefits of CEUS– core needle biopsy (CNB) and percutaneous hepatic lesion ablation.
{"title":"Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Image-Guided Procedures","authors":"Gentry Russell , Benjamin S. Strnad , Daniel R. Ludwig , William D. Middleton , Malak Itani , Rachita Khot , Vincent Mellnick , Christopher Malone","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100913","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100913","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) uses intravenously injected gas microbubbles as a pure blood pool contrast agent to demonstrate blood flow and tissue perfusion at a much higher sensitivity than </span>color Doppler<span><span> and power Doppler ultrasound. CEUS has gained traction in abdominal diagnostic imaging for improved lesion detection and characterization and a complementary problem-solving tool to CT and MRI. In addition to its diagnostic applications, CEUS has also proven useful for pre-procedure planning, procedure guidance, and post-procedure evaluation. This review provides a practical overview and guides to the application of CEUS in percutaneous, ultrasound-guided, needle-driven procedures, focusing on 2 common procedures, which illustrate the many benefits of CEUS– </span>core needle biopsy (CNB) and percutaneous hepatic lesion ablation.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 100913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136007792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100917
Michael Swikehardt , Janice Newsome , Matthew Macey , Peter Park , Rajendran Vilvendhan , Arif Kamil , Zachary Bercu , Sebastian Flacke MD, PhD
The accuracy of the robotic device not only relies on a reproducible needle advancement, but also on the possibility to correct target movement at chosen checkpoints and to deviate from a linear to a nonlinear trajectory. We report our experience in using the robotic device for the insertion of trocar needles in CT guided procedures. The majority of procedures were targeted organ biopsies in the chest abdomen or pelvis. The accuracy of needle placement after target adjustments did not significantly differ from those patients where a linear trajectory could be used. The steering capabilities of the robot allow correction of target movement of the fly.
{"title":"Percutaneous Robotics in Interventional Radiology","authors":"Michael Swikehardt , Janice Newsome , Matthew Macey , Peter Park , Rajendran Vilvendhan , Arif Kamil , Zachary Bercu , Sebastian Flacke MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100917","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100917","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accuracy of the robotic device not only relies on a reproducible needle advancement, but also on the possibility to correct target movement at chosen checkpoints and to deviate from a linear to a nonlinear trajectory. We report our experience in using the robotic device for the insertion of trocar needles in CT guided procedures. The majority of procedures were targeted organ biopsies in the chest abdomen or pelvis. The accuracy of needle placement after target adjustments did not significantly differ from those patients where a linear trajectory could be used. The steering capabilities of the robot allow correction of target movement of the fly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 100917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135964097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}