Background: Both food insecurity (FI) and vision impairment (VI), which are linked, have been independently associated with frailty and falls.
Objectives: Understand how FI and VI may together contribute to frailty and fall risk could improve insight into these growing public health challenges.
Design, setting, participants, measurements: This study included 5,963 participants aged 65 and older enrolled in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Participants were divided into four exposure groups ("No FI or VI," "FI, no VI," "VI, no FI," and "Both") based on self-report. The Fried Frailty Index and self-reported falls were assessed annually. We used adjusted logistic and Poisson regression models to examine cross-sectional associations and generalized estimating equations to examine longitudinal associations between FI/VI status and falls and frailty outcomes.
Results: Most study participants reported neither FI nor VI (n=5169, 86.7%); however, having both FI and VI (n=57, 1%) was cross-sectionally associated with higher frailty score and higher odds of falling multiple times in the last year. FI and/or VI were longitudinally associated with higher frailty score and increased frailty risk, with the strongest association for Both (RRR=1.29, 95% CI 1.23, 1.58; OR=3.18, 95% CI 1.78, 5.69), and with falling, again highest among those with Both, for one (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.41, 3.96) and multiple (OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.50, 4.06) falls in the last year.
Conclusion: Clinical and public health interventions could address the intersection of FI and VI with the aim of ameliorating the impact of these risk factors and health outcomes.
背景:食物不安全(FI)和视力障碍(VI)是相互关联的:食物不安全(FI)和视力障碍(VI)是相互关联的,两者都与虚弱和跌倒有独立联系:目的:了解食物不安全和视力障碍如何共同导致虚弱和跌倒风险,可提高对这些日益严峻的公共卫生挑战的认识:这项研究包括 5963 名 65 岁及以上的参与者,他们都参加了全国健康与老龄化趋势研究。根据自我报告,参与者被分为四个暴露组("无 FI 或 VI"、"FI,无 VI"、"VI,无 FI "和 "两者")。每年对弗里德虚弱指数和自我报告的跌倒情况进行评估。我们使用调整后的逻辑回归模型和泊松回归模型来检验横向联系,并使用广义估计方程来检验 FI/VI 状态与跌倒和虚弱结果之间的纵向联系:大多数研究参与者既未报告 FI 也未报告 VI(人数=5169,占 86.7%);然而,既有 FI 又有 VI(人数=57,占 1%)与较高的虚弱评分和去年多次跌倒的较高几率存在横截面关联。FI和/或VI与更高的虚弱评分和更高的虚弱风险纵向相关,二者均有者的相关性最强(RRR=1.29,95% CI 1.23,1.58;OR=3.18,95% CI 1.78,5.69),而与跌倒相关,二者均有者的相关性也最高,去年跌倒一次(OR=2.47,95% CI 1.41,3.96)和多次(OR=2.46,95% CI 1.50,4.06):临床和公共卫生干预措施可以解决FI和VI的交叉问题,从而改善这些风险因素对健康结果的影响。
{"title":"Food Insecurity, Vision Impairment, and Longitudinal Risk of Frailty and Falls in The National Health and Aging Trends Study.","authors":"A M Wennberg, S Ek, M Na","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.21","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both food insecurity (FI) and vision impairment (VI), which are linked, have been independently associated with frailty and falls.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understand how FI and VI may together contribute to frailty and fall risk could improve insight into these growing public health challenges.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants, measurements: </strong>This study included 5,963 participants aged 65 and older enrolled in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Participants were divided into four exposure groups (\"No FI or VI,\" \"FI, no VI,\" \"VI, no FI,\" and \"Both\") based on self-report. The Fried Frailty Index and self-reported falls were assessed annually. We used adjusted logistic and Poisson regression models to examine cross-sectional associations and generalized estimating equations to examine longitudinal associations between FI/VI status and falls and frailty outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most study participants reported neither FI nor VI (n=5169, 86.7%); however, having both FI and VI (n=57, 1%) was cross-sectionally associated with higher frailty score and higher odds of falling multiple times in the last year. FI and/or VI were longitudinally associated with higher frailty score and increased frailty risk, with the strongest association for Both (RRR=1.29, 95% CI 1.23, 1.58; OR=3.18, 95% CI 1.78, 5.69), and with falling, again highest among those with Both, for one (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.41, 3.96) and multiple (OR=2.46, 95% CI 1.50, 4.06) falls in the last year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical and public health interventions could address the intersection of FI and VI with the aim of ameliorating the impact of these risk factors and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S S Ahip, C Y Ting, M A B Abdillah, Y J Tan, S A B Sabri, O Theou, S Shariff-Ghazali, R Visvanathan
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation stage of Malaysia's GeKo-Integrated Service Delivery (ISD) model for frailty management in primary care and explore its effectiveness in improving frailty scores.
Methods: The implementation stage of Malaysia's first three GeKo- ISD clinics was assessed using the WHO-ICOPE (Integrated Care of the Older Persons) scorecard. This involved evaluating documents related to the GeKo services and conducting in-depth interviews with key informants identified from those documents. The efficacy of GeKo-ISD was assessed by documenting the change in mean frailty scores between baseline and 3 months post intervention, measured by the Pictorial Fit Frail Scale Malay Version (PFFS-M), in patients who received GeKo-ISD care from October 2022 to April 2023.
Results: All three GeKo clinics achieved the sustaining implementation level, scoring a total of 50 out of 52. The paired t-test reported a significant reduction (p= 0.001) in the PFFS-M scores from baseline to 3 months after the GeKo-ISD intervention. The mean (SD) scores were 8.6 (4.6) at baseline and 7.0 (4.1) at 3 months post-intervention.
Conclusion: GeKo-ISD is a comprehensive approach of integrated care for older people, leveraging existing public funded primary care infrastructure. It shows promise, was impacted by the pandemic but now, with support from the government, exists in 32 centers across one state in Malaysia.
{"title":"Integrated Service Delivery Model in Primary Care to Improve Frailty in Older Malaysians: GeKo Integrated Service Delivery.","authors":"S S Ahip, C Y Ting, M A B Abdillah, Y J Tan, S A B Sabri, O Theou, S Shariff-Ghazali, R Visvanathan","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.42","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the implementation stage of Malaysia's GeKo-Integrated Service Delivery (ISD) model for frailty management in primary care and explore its effectiveness in improving frailty scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The implementation stage of Malaysia's first three GeKo- ISD clinics was assessed using the WHO-ICOPE (Integrated Care of the Older Persons) scorecard. This involved evaluating documents related to the GeKo services and conducting in-depth interviews with key informants identified from those documents. The efficacy of GeKo-ISD was assessed by documenting the change in mean frailty scores between baseline and 3 months post intervention, measured by the Pictorial Fit Frail Scale Malay Version (PFFS-M), in patients who received GeKo-ISD care from October 2022 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three GeKo clinics achieved the sustaining implementation level, scoring a total of 50 out of 52. The paired t-test reported a significant reduction (p= 0.001) in the PFFS-M scores from baseline to 3 months after the GeKo-ISD intervention. The mean (SD) scores were 8.6 (4.6) at baseline and 7.0 (4.1) at 3 months post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GeKo-ISD is a comprehensive approach of integrated care for older people, leveraging existing public funded primary care infrastructure. It shows promise, was impacted by the pandemic but now, with support from the government, exists in 32 centers across one state in Malaysia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C Pollak, J Verghese, A S Buchman, Y Jin, H M Blumen
Background: Loneliness is highly prevalent among older adults and is associated with frailty. Most studies consider loneliness in isolation without consideration for structural and functional measures of social relationships - and longitudinal studies are scarce.
Objectives: This study examined longitudinal associations between loneliness and frailty and analyzed how structural and functional social measures influence these associations.
Design: Linear mixed effects models examined longitudinal associations between loneliness and frailty assessed with the frailty index (scale 0-100). Models were adjusted for baseline age, gender, education, depressive symptoms, global cognition, and structural (e.g., social network, marital status), and functional social measures (e.g., social, cognitive, and physical activity, and social support).
Participants: Loneliness and frailty data from 1,931 older adults without dementia at baseline from the Rush Memory and Aging Project were examined (mean age 79.6 ± 7.7 years, 74.9% female).
Measurements: Baseline loneliness assessed by the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale was the predictor of interest.
Results: Frailty increased significantly over a mean follow-up period of 4.6 years. Effects of loneliness on frailty were modified by marital status. Loneliness predicted an additional accumulation of 0.37 and 0.34 deficits on the frailty index per year in married and widowed individuals respectively, compared to those who were not lonely (married: p=0.009, CI 0.09, 0.64; widowed: p=0.005, CI 0.1, 0.58). Loneliness did not predict frailty progression in unmarried individuals.
Conclusions: Loneliness predicts frailty progression, highlighting the importance of social determinants on physical health in aging.
背景孤独在老年人中非常普遍,并且与虚弱有关。大多数研究都是孤立地考虑孤独感,而没有考虑社会关系的结构性和功能性措施,纵向研究也很少:本研究探讨了孤独与虚弱之间的纵向联系,并分析了结构性和功能性社会措施如何影响这些联系:线性混合效应模型检验了孤独感与以虚弱指数(0-100分)评估的虚弱程度之间的纵向联系。模型对基线年龄、性别、教育程度、抑郁症状、整体认知、结构性(如社交网络、婚姻状况)和功能性社会测量(如社交、认知、体育活动和社会支持)进行了调整:对拉什记忆与衰老项目(Rush Memory and Aging Project)中 1931 名基线无痴呆症的老年人(平均年龄为 79.6 ± 7.7 岁,74.9% 为女性)的孤独感和虚弱感数据进行了研究:基线孤独感由 de Jong Gierveld 孤独感量表评估:结果:在平均 4.6 年的随访期间,虚弱程度明显增加。孤独感对虚弱程度的影响受婚姻状况的影响。与不孤独的人相比,孤独感可预测已婚和丧偶的人每年在虚弱指数上分别多累积 0.37 和 0.34 的缺陷(已婚:P=0.009,CI 0.09,0.64;丧偶:P=0.005,CI 0.1,0.58)。孤独并不能预测未婚者的虚弱程度:结论:孤独感可预测衰弱的进展,这凸显了社会决定因素对老龄化过程中身体健康的重要性。
{"title":"Loneliness Predicts Progression of Frailty in Married and Widowed, but Not Unmarried Community Dwelling Older Adults.","authors":"C Pollak, J Verghese, A S Buchman, Y Jin, H M Blumen","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.27","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loneliness is highly prevalent among older adults and is associated with frailty. Most studies consider loneliness in isolation without consideration for structural and functional measures of social relationships - and longitudinal studies are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined longitudinal associations between loneliness and frailty and analyzed how structural and functional social measures influence these associations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Linear mixed effects models examined longitudinal associations between loneliness and frailty assessed with the frailty index (scale 0-100). Models were adjusted for baseline age, gender, education, depressive symptoms, global cognition, and structural (e.g., social network, marital status), and functional social measures (e.g., social, cognitive, and physical activity, and social support).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Loneliness and frailty data from 1,931 older adults without dementia at baseline from the Rush Memory and Aging Project were examined (mean age 79.6 ± 7.7 years, 74.9% female).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Baseline loneliness assessed by the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale was the predictor of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frailty increased significantly over a mean follow-up period of 4.6 years. Effects of loneliness on frailty were modified by marital status. Loneliness predicted an additional accumulation of 0.37 and 0.34 deficits on the frailty index per year in married and widowed individuals respectively, compared to those who were not lonely (married: p=0.009, CI 0.09, 0.64; widowed: p=0.005, CI 0.1, 0.58). Loneliness did not predict frailty progression in unmarried individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loneliness predicts frailty progression, highlighting the importance of social determinants on physical health in aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
T Doi, K Tsutsumimoto, K Makino, S Nakakubo, F Sakimoto, S Matsuda, H Shimada
Objectives: To examine the association between social frailty and life-space activities, and determine whether a combined status of life-space activities and social frailty is associated with risk of disability among older adults.
Design: A prospective cohort study.
Setting and participants: The participants were 8,301 older adults (mean age 72.9 ± 5.6 years, women [53.3%]) from a community setting.
Methods: Life-space activities were evaluated using the Active Mobility Index (AMI) to assess activities in each life-space (distance from the respondent's home: up to 1 km, 1-10 km, or greater than 10 km) during the past 1 month. Activities were also assessed according to physical or social activity. Social frailty and characteristics were measured at the baseline. Incident disability was assessed according to long term care insurance.
Results: The lowest scoring group was based on the quartile in each of the AMI scores (Q1), with reference to the highest scoring group, which had a higher odds ratios for social frailty (AMI total score Q1: OR 4.32, 95% CI 3.43-5.45, AMI physical score Q1: 2.19, 95% CI 1.79-2.69, AMI social score Q1: 5.04, 95% CI 3.94-6.44). During the follow-up (mean 23.5 months), 330 participants had incident disability. Incident disability was associated with social frailty. Combined status of social frailty and low AMI increased the risk of disability (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.52-3.03), with reference to non-frailty and higher AMI scores.
Conclusions and implications: Social frailty or reduced activity in life-space assessment were identified as risk factors for incident disability. To decrease the risk of disability, the development of an intervention program to enhance activities and cope with social frailty is required.
目的:研究社会脆弱性与生活空间活动之间的关系,并确定生活空间活动和社会脆弱性的综合状况是否与老年人的残疾风险相关:研究社会脆弱性与生活空间活动之间的关系,并确定生活空间活动和社会脆弱性的综合状况是否与老年人的残疾风险有关:设计:前瞻性队列研究:参与者:8301 名来自社区的老年人(平均年龄 72.9 ± 5.6 岁,女性 [53.3%]):采用主动移动指数(AMI)评估过去 1 个月中每个生活空间(与受访者住所的距离:1 公里以内、1-10 公里或 10 公里以上)的活动。活动还根据体力活动或社交活动进行评估。社会脆弱性和特征在基线时进行测量。残疾情况根据长期护理保险进行评估:最低评分组基于 AMI 各项评分的四分位数(Q1),而最高评分组的社会虚弱几率比较大(AMI 总分 Q1:AMI总分Q1:OR 4.32,95% CI 3.43-5.45;AMI身体得分Q1:2.19,95% CI 1.79-2.69;AMI社会得分Q1:5.04,95% CI 3.94-6.44)。在随访期间(平均 23.5 个月),330 名参与者发生了残疾。发生残疾与社会虚弱有关。与非虚弱和较高的 AMI 评分相比,社会虚弱和低 AMI 合并状态会增加残疾风险(HR 2.15,95% CI 1.52-3.03):在生活空间评估中,社会脆弱性或活动减少被认为是导致残疾的风险因素。为降低残疾风险,需要制定干预计划,以加强活动和应对社交虚弱。
{"title":"Combined Social Frailty and Life-Space Activities Associated with Risk of Disability: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"T Doi, K Tsutsumimoto, K Makino, S Nakakubo, F Sakimoto, S Matsuda, H Shimada","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.17","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between social frailty and life-space activities, and determine whether a combined status of life-space activities and social frailty is associated with risk of disability among older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The participants were 8,301 older adults (mean age 72.9 ± 5.6 years, women [53.3%]) from a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Life-space activities were evaluated using the Active Mobility Index (AMI) to assess activities in each life-space (distance from the respondent's home: up to 1 km, 1-10 km, or greater than 10 km) during the past 1 month. Activities were also assessed according to physical or social activity. Social frailty and characteristics were measured at the baseline. Incident disability was assessed according to long term care insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest scoring group was based on the quartile in each of the AMI scores (Q1), with reference to the highest scoring group, which had a higher odds ratios for social frailty (AMI total score Q1: OR 4.32, 95% CI 3.43-5.45, AMI physical score Q1: 2.19, 95% CI 1.79-2.69, AMI social score Q1: 5.04, 95% CI 3.94-6.44). During the follow-up (mean 23.5 months), 330 participants had incident disability. Incident disability was associated with social frailty. Combined status of social frailty and low AMI increased the risk of disability (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.52-3.03), with reference to non-frailty and higher AMI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Social frailty or reduced activity in life-space assessment were identified as risk factors for incident disability. To decrease the risk of disability, the development of an intervention program to enhance activities and cope with social frailty is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L Orlandini, E Patrizio, A M O'Halloran, C A McGarrigle, R Romero-Ortuno, R A Kenny, M Proietti, M Cesari
Background: Social vulnerability interacts with frailty and influences individuals' health status. Although frailty and social vulnerability are highly predictive of adverse outcomes, their relationship with self-perceived health(SPH) has been less investigated.
Methods: Data are from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing(TILDA), a population-based longitudinal study of ageing. We included 4,222 participants aged ≥50 years (age 61.4±8.5 years;women 56%) from Wave 1 (2009-2011) followed over three longitudinal waves (2012,2014-2015,2016). Participants responded to single questions with five response options to rate their 1)physical health, 2)mental health, and 3)health compared to peers. 30-item Frailty (FI) and Social Vulnerability (SVI) indices were calculated using standardised methods. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to establish the association between FI and SVI cross-sectionally and longitudinally over 6 years.
Results: Cross-sectionally, SVI (mean:0.40±0.08; range:0.14-0.81) and FI (mean: 0.13±0.08; range:0.10-0.58) were modestly correlated (r=0.256), and independently associated with poor physical health (SVI: OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.15-1.78; FI: OR 3.16, 95%CI 2.54-3.93), poor mental health (SVI: OR 1.65, 95%CI 1.17-2.35; FI: OR 3.64, 95%CI 2.53-5.24), and poor health compared to peers (SVI: OR 1.41,95%CI 1.06-1.89; FI: OR 3.86, 95%CI 2.9-5.14). Longitudinally, FI and SVI were independently and positively associated with poor physical health (SVI: β 1.08, 95%CI 0.76-1.39; FI: β 1.97, 95%CI 1.58-2.36), poor mental health (SVI: β 1.18, 95%CI 0.86-1.5; FI: β 1.58, 95%CI 1.2-1.97), and poor overall health compared to peers (SVI: β 0.78, 95%CI 0.89-1.33; FI: β 1.74, 95%CI 0.47-1.1).
Conclusions: In a large cohort of community-dwelling older adults, frailty and social vulnerability were associated with poor SPH and with risk of SPH decline over six years.
{"title":"Social Vulnerability, Frailty and Self-Perceived Health: Findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).","authors":"L Orlandini, E Patrizio, A M O'Halloran, C A McGarrigle, R Romero-Ortuno, R A Kenny, M Proietti, M Cesari","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.1","DOIUrl":"10.14283/jfa.2024.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social vulnerability interacts with frailty and influences individuals' health status. Although frailty and social vulnerability are highly predictive of adverse outcomes, their relationship with self-perceived health(SPH) has been less investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing(TILDA), a population-based longitudinal study of ageing. We included 4,222 participants aged ≥50 years (age 61.4±8.5 years;women 56%) from Wave 1 (2009-2011) followed over three longitudinal waves (2012,2014-2015,2016). Participants responded to single questions with five response options to rate their 1)physical health, 2)mental health, and 3)health compared to peers. 30-item Frailty (FI) and Social Vulnerability (SVI) indices were calculated using standardised methods. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to establish the association between FI and SVI cross-sectionally and longitudinally over 6 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cross-sectionally, SVI (mean:0.40±0.08; range:0.14-0.81) and FI (mean: 0.13±0.08; range:0.10-0.58) were modestly correlated (r=0.256), and independently associated with poor physical health (SVI: OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.15-1.78; FI: OR 3.16, 95%CI 2.54-3.93), poor mental health (SVI: OR 1.65, 95%CI 1.17-2.35; FI: OR 3.64, 95%CI 2.53-5.24), and poor health compared to peers (SVI: OR 1.41,95%CI 1.06-1.89; FI: OR 3.86, 95%CI 2.9-5.14). Longitudinally, FI and SVI were independently and positively associated with poor physical health (SVI: β 1.08, 95%CI 0.76-1.39; FI: β 1.97, 95%CI 1.58-2.36), poor mental health (SVI: β 1.18, 95%CI 0.86-1.5; FI: β 1.58, 95%CI 1.2-1.97), and poor overall health compared to peers (SVI: β 0.78, 95%CI 0.89-1.33; FI: β 1.74, 95%CI 0.47-1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large cohort of community-dwelling older adults, frailty and social vulnerability were associated with poor SPH and with risk of SPH decline over six years.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139673633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H Liu, W Li, M Zhu, X Wen, J Jin, H Wang, D Lv, S Zhao, X Wu, J Jiao
Background: Population aging might increase the prevalence of undernutrition in older people, which increases the risk of frailty. Numerous studies have indicated that myokines are released by skeletal myocytes in response to muscular contractions and might be associated with frailty. This study aimed to evaluate whether myokines are biomarkers of frailty in older inpatients with undernutrition.
Methods: The frailty biomarkers were extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus and Genecards datasets. Relevant myokines and health-related variables were assessed in 55 inpatients aged ≥ 65 years from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital prospective longitudinal frailty study. Serum was prepared for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the appropriate kits. Correlations between biomarkers and frailty status were calculated by Spearman's correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression was performed to investigate the association between factors and frailty scores.
Results: The prevalence of frailty was 13.21%. The bioinformatics analysis indicated that leptin, adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), irisin, decorin, and myostatin were potential biomarkers of frailty. The frailty group had significantly higher concentrations of leptin, AMPK, and MSTN than the robust group (p < 0.05). AMPK was significantly positively correlated with frailty (p < 0.05). The pre-frailty and frailty groups had significantly lower concentrations of irisin than the robust group (p < 0.05), whereas the DCN concentration did not differ among the groups. Multiple linear regression suggested that the 15 factors influencing the coefficients of association, the top 50% were the ADL score, MNA-SF score, serum albumin concentration, urination function, hearing function, leptin concentration, GDS-15 score, and MSTN concentration.
Conclusions: Proinflammatory myokines, particularly leptin, myostatin, and AMPK, negatively affect muscle mass and strength in older adults. ADL and nutritional status play major roles in the development of frailty. Our results confirm that identification of frailty relies upon clinical variables, myokine concentrations, and functional parameters, which might enable the identification and monitoring of frailty.
{"title":"Myokines and Biomarkers of Frailty in Older Inpatients with Undernutrition: A Prospective Study.","authors":"H Liu, W Li, M Zhu, X Wen, J Jin, H Wang, D Lv, S Zhao, X Wu, J Jiao","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population aging might increase the prevalence of undernutrition in older people, which increases the risk of frailty. Numerous studies have indicated that myokines are released by skeletal myocytes in response to muscular contractions and might be associated with frailty. This study aimed to evaluate whether myokines are biomarkers of frailty in older inpatients with undernutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The frailty biomarkers were extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus and Genecards datasets. Relevant myokines and health-related variables were assessed in 55 inpatients aged ≥ 65 years from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital prospective longitudinal frailty study. Serum was prepared for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the appropriate kits. Correlations between biomarkers and frailty status were calculated by Spearman's correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression was performed to investigate the association between factors and frailty scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of frailty was 13.21%. The bioinformatics analysis indicated that leptin, adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), irisin, decorin, and myostatin were potential biomarkers of frailty. The frailty group had significantly higher concentrations of leptin, AMPK, and MSTN than the robust group (p < 0.05). AMPK was significantly positively correlated with frailty (p < 0.05). The pre-frailty and frailty groups had significantly lower concentrations of irisin than the robust group (p < 0.05), whereas the DCN concentration did not differ among the groups. Multiple linear regression suggested that the 15 factors influencing the coefficients of association, the top 50% were the ADL score, MNA-SF score, serum albumin concentration, urination function, hearing function, leptin concentration, GDS-15 score, and MSTN concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proinflammatory myokines, particularly leptin, myostatin, and AMPK, negatively affect muscle mass and strength in older adults. ADL and nutritional status play major roles in the development of frailty. Our results confirm that identification of frailty relies upon clinical variables, myokine concentrations, and functional parameters, which might enable the identification and monitoring of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Knowledge of frailty is essential for meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies for US trainees. The UK General Medical Council requires that frailty be included in undergraduate and graduate medical education curricula. Trainees are expected to appropriately modify care plans and help make patient-centered decisions, while incorporating diagnostic uncertainty, such as frailty, in older adults. Little is known about current needs for frailty instruction in graduate medical education in the US and beyond.
Objective: We sought to capture faculty perceptions on how frailty should be defined and identified, and what aspects and level of detail should be taught to residents.
Design: The authors developed a 4-item short response questionnaire, and faculty had the option to respond via electronic survey or via semi-structured interviews.
Setting and subjects: Respondents included 24 fellowship-trained geriatricians based at 6 different academic medical centers in a single urban metropolitan area.
Methods: An invitation to participate in either an electronic survey or semi-structured virtual interview was e-mailed to 30 geriatricians affiliated with an academic multi-campus Geriatric Medicine fellowship. Responses were transcribed and coded independently by two authors.
Results: Responses were received from 24 geriatricians via a combination of digital questionnaires (n=18) and semi-structured online interviews (n=6), for a response rate of 80%. Responses revealed significant diversity of opinion on how to define and identify frailty and how these concepts should be taught.
Conclusions: As frailty is increasingly incorporated into clinical practice, consensus is needed on how to define and teach frailty to residents.
{"title":"Teaching Frailty to Medical Residents: A Needs Assessment Among Geriatrics Faculty.","authors":"M Cheslock, A Nahas, A R Orkaby, A W Schwartz","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.26","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of frailty is essential for meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies for US trainees. The UK General Medical Council requires that frailty be included in undergraduate and graduate medical education curricula. Trainees are expected to appropriately modify care plans and help make patient-centered decisions, while incorporating diagnostic uncertainty, such as frailty, in older adults. Little is known about current needs for frailty instruction in graduate medical education in the US and beyond.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to capture faculty perceptions on how frailty should be defined and identified, and what aspects and level of detail should be taught to residents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The authors developed a 4-item short response questionnaire, and faculty had the option to respond via electronic survey or via semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting and subjects: </strong>Respondents included 24 fellowship-trained geriatricians based at 6 different academic medical centers in a single urban metropolitan area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An invitation to participate in either an electronic survey or semi-structured virtual interview was e-mailed to 30 geriatricians affiliated with an academic multi-campus Geriatric Medicine fellowship. Responses were transcribed and coded independently by two authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 24 geriatricians via a combination of digital questionnaires (n=18) and semi-structured online interviews (n=6), for a response rate of 80%. Responses revealed significant diversity of opinion on how to define and identify frailty and how these concepts should be taught.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As frailty is increasingly incorporated into clinical practice, consensus is needed on how to define and teach frailty to residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R C Castrejón-Pérez, S A Borges-Yáñez, R Ramírez-Aldana, I Nasu, Y Saito
Background: Oral health is a relevant component for overall health. Oral disease onset at an early age and may harm several health dimensions, especially among older people, and has been associated with frailty.
Objective: To evaluate associations between the Frailty Index (FI) and self-reported oral diseases among older, community-dwelling Japanese people.
Design: Cross-sectional and prospective analyses were performed.
Setting and participants: We analyzed data from 2,529 participants at the baseline and four-year follow-up of the Nihon University Japanese Longitudinal Study of Aging, which had a four-year follow-up.
Measurements: We used the self-reported number of teeth, self-reported satisfaction with dentures, and self-reported ability to chew hard food as independent variables. We computed an FI that included 40 deficits as the dependent variable. The FI score ranged from 0 to 1, with a higher score associated with adverse health outcomes and mortality. Considering a gamma distribution and controlling for age, gender, marital status, education, working status, and residence area, we fitted generalized linear models.
Results: We found that dissatisfied denture users had a 2.1% (95% CI 1.006-3.279) higher frailty score than non-denture users at the baseline and a 2.1% (95% CI 0.629-3.690) higher frailty score than non-denture users at the four-year follow-up. In the cross-sectional analysis, with each additional reported tooth at the baseline, the FI score was lower by 1.5% (95% CI -2.878 to -0.208) at the four-year follow-up. In both the cross-sectional and the prospective analyses, the FI scores increased as the ability to chew hard food decreased.
Conclusions: Self-reported oral diseases are associated with the FI score cross-sectionally and prospectively. Identifying factors prospectively associated with frailty may improve strategies for the next generation of older people. Considering oral diseases may help clinicians personalize treatment plans for older people.
背景:口腔健康是整体健康的重要组成部分。口腔疾病发病年龄较早,可能会损害多个健康维度,尤其是在老年人中,并且与体弱有关:评估日本社区老年人的虚弱指数(FI)与自我报告的口腔疾病之间的关系:设计:进行横断面和前瞻性分析:我们分析了日本大学日本老龄化纵向研究(Nihon University Japanese Longitudinal Study of Aging)中 2,529 名参与者的基线和四年随访数据:我们将自我报告的牙齿数量、自我报告的假牙满意度和自我报告的咀嚼硬质食物的能力作为自变量。我们计算了包含 40 项缺陷的 FI 作为因变量。FI 分值从 0 到 1 不等,分值越高,健康状况越差,死亡率越高。考虑到伽马分布并控制年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度、工作状况和居住地区,我们建立了广义线性模型:结果:我们发现,不满意义齿使用者的虚弱评分在基线时比非义齿使用者高 2.1%(95% CI 1.006-3.279),在四年随访时比非义齿使用者高 2.1%(95% CI 0.629-3.690)。在横断面分析中,基线时每多报告一颗牙齿,四年随访时的 FI 分数就会降低 1.5% (95% CI -2.878 至 -0.208)。在横断面分析和前瞻性分析中,随着咀嚼硬质食物能力的下降,FI 分数也随之上升:结论:自我报告的口腔疾病在横断面和前瞻性分析中都与 FI 分数相关。前瞻性地识别与虚弱相关的因素可改善针对下一代老年人的策略。考虑口腔疾病可能有助于临床医生为老年人制定个性化的治疗方案。
{"title":"Self-Reported Oral Diseases and Their Association with the Frailty index among Older Japanese People: Four-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"R C Castrejón-Pérez, S A Borges-Yáñez, R Ramírez-Aldana, I Nasu, Y Saito","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.10","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral health is a relevant component for overall health. Oral disease onset at an early age and may harm several health dimensions, especially among older people, and has been associated with frailty.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate associations between the Frailty Index (FI) and self-reported oral diseases among older, community-dwelling Japanese people.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional and prospective analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>We analyzed data from 2,529 participants at the baseline and four-year follow-up of the Nihon University Japanese Longitudinal Study of Aging, which had a four-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We used the self-reported number of teeth, self-reported satisfaction with dentures, and self-reported ability to chew hard food as independent variables. We computed an FI that included 40 deficits as the dependent variable. The FI score ranged from 0 to 1, with a higher score associated with adverse health outcomes and mortality. Considering a gamma distribution and controlling for age, gender, marital status, education, working status, and residence area, we fitted generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that dissatisfied denture users had a 2.1% (95% CI 1.006-3.279) higher frailty score than non-denture users at the baseline and a 2.1% (95% CI 0.629-3.690) higher frailty score than non-denture users at the four-year follow-up. In the cross-sectional analysis, with each additional reported tooth at the baseline, the FI score was lower by 1.5% (95% CI -2.878 to -0.208) at the four-year follow-up. In both the cross-sectional and the prospective analyses, the FI scores increased as the ability to chew hard food decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-reported oral diseases are associated with the FI score cross-sectionally and prospectively. Identifying factors prospectively associated with frailty may improve strategies for the next generation of older people. Considering oral diseases may help clinicians personalize treatment plans for older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S E Petry, A D Thompson, E R Hauser, S M Lynch, S H Boyle, J Upchurch, A Press, K J Sims, C D Williams, E J Gifford
Background: Veterans of the first Gulf War (1990-1991) are reaching middle and older adulthood in differing degrees of health and biological age. Many Gulf War veterans report myriad negative symptoms classified as Gulf War illness (GWI), a chronic multi-symptom illness.
Objectives: To describe and analyze deficit accumulation, among veterans with Severe GWI (SGWI+) and those without Severe GWI (SGWI-), to assess the association between a medically unexplained illness and aging.
Design: This study uses a retrospective cohort design with quasi-longitudinal data.
Setting: The recruitment sample included 10,042 Gulf War era veterans across all four US Census regions.
Participants: The analytic sample included 1,054 participants of the GWECB for whom SGWI case status could be determined and who had valid responses for at least 90% of the deficits included in the deficit accumulation index.
Measurements: Chronic health conditions were retroactively reported, including year of diagnosis, enabling us to create a longitudinal measure of deficit accumulation. This deficit accumulation index (DAI) ranged from 0-1 for each respondent in each year between 1991-2013. We compare veterans with SGWI+ to those with SGWI- using the CDC case definition.
Results: Most veterans in our sample could expect to spend more years with moderate or substantial deficits than without deficits. SGWI+ was associated with spending more years with substantial deficits than those with SGWI-. Veterans in middle age (age 35-65) experienced more years with substantial deficits than younger veterans. Individuals with SGWI+ had 13 times the hazard of accumulating substantial deficits than those without.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that veterans with SGWI+, even those in midlife, experienced aging as measured by accumulating deficits. Practitioners should consider patients with multi-symptom illnesses as at risk of accelerated aging, tailoring treatments to address patients' holistic needs.
{"title":"Characterizing Deficit Accumulation Among Gulf War Era Veterans.","authors":"S E Petry, A D Thompson, E R Hauser, S M Lynch, S H Boyle, J Upchurch, A Press, K J Sims, C D Williams, E J Gifford","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.44","DOIUrl":"10.14283/jfa.2024.44","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veterans of the first Gulf War (1990-1991) are reaching middle and older adulthood in differing degrees of health and biological age. Many Gulf War veterans report myriad negative symptoms classified as Gulf War illness (GWI), a chronic multi-symptom illness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe and analyze deficit accumulation, among veterans with Severe GWI (SGWI+) and those without Severe GWI (SGWI-), to assess the association between a medically unexplained illness and aging.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study uses a retrospective cohort design with quasi-longitudinal data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The recruitment sample included 10,042 Gulf War era veterans across all four US Census regions.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The analytic sample included 1,054 participants of the GWECB for whom SGWI case status could be determined and who had valid responses for at least 90% of the deficits included in the deficit accumulation index.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Chronic health conditions were retroactively reported, including year of diagnosis, enabling us to create a longitudinal measure of deficit accumulation. This deficit accumulation index (DAI) ranged from 0-1 for each respondent in each year between 1991-2013. We compare veterans with SGWI+ to those with SGWI- using the CDC case definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most veterans in our sample could expect to spend more years with moderate or substantial deficits than without deficits. SGWI+ was associated with spending more years with substantial deficits than those with SGWI-. Veterans in middle age (age 35-65) experienced more years with substantial deficits than younger veterans. Individuals with SGWI+ had 13 times the hazard of accumulating substantial deficits than those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that veterans with SGWI+, even those in midlife, experienced aging as measured by accumulating deficits. Practitioners should consider patients with multi-symptom illnesses as at risk of accelerated aging, tailoring treatments to address patients' holistic needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Abstract: Symposia, Conferences, Oral communications: 14th International Conference on Frailty and Sarcopenia Research (ICFSR)March 20-22, 2024, Albuquerque, NM, USA.","authors":"","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2024.20","DOIUrl":"10.14283/jfa.2024.20","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140319875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}