Journal of Healthcare Management最新文献

Goal: Patients engaged in self-care through information technology can potentially improve the quality of healthcare they receive. This study aimed to examine how electronic health record (EHR) system functionalities help hospitals mediate the impact of patient engagement on quality outcomes-notably, readmission rates.

Methods: A pooled cross-sectional study design employed data containing 3,547 observations from general acute care hospitals (2014-2018). The breadth of patient engagement functionalities adopted by a hospital was used as the independent variable and the degree of EHR presence was used as the mediating variable. Mean time to readmission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pneumonia, and heart failure were the dependent variables. The Baron and Kenny method was used to test mediation.

Principal findings: Patient engagement was associated with reduced AMI readmission rates both directly and via EHR system presence. Mediation effects were present, in that a 1-unit increase in patient engagement through EHR system presence was associated with a 0.33% decrease in AMI readmission rates (p < .05). For other disease categories (heart failure and pneumonia), a significant effect was not found.

Practical applications: For hospitals with a comprehensive EHR system, patient engagement through information technology can potentially reduce readmission rates for some diseases. More research is needed to determine which specific clinical conditions are amenable to quality improvement through patient engagement. Synergies between patient engagement functionalities and an EHR system positively affect quality outcomes. Therefore, practitioners and hospital managers should leverage hospital investments made in their EHR system infrastructure and use it to engage patients in self-care.

Goal: Patient safety and quality care are two critical areas that every healthcare organization strives to grow and improve upon. At Scripps Health, specific efforts reviewed for this article were implemented to reduce hospital-acquired conditions and hospital readmissions that are components of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services programs and Leapfrog Hospital Survey scores.

Methods: Sprint teams, a novel approach to rapidly develop a checklist for lower-performing care improvement areas, were implemented after an internal review of existing tools and an evidence-based literature review. These areas included catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), Clostridioides difficile (C. diff.) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure readmissions, surgical site infections and handwashing, bar coding, and the computerized physician order entry components of Leapfrog scoring. The checklist for each area served as a teaching tool for staff and a guideline for case review to ensure that standard work was routinely performed.

Principal findings: The sprint teams showed dramatic results in the initial focus areas. From a baseline standardized infection ratio (SIR) of 1.141 for CLABSIs, the sprint team reduced the SIR to 0.885 in Year 1 of the program and to 0.687 in Year 2. For CAUTIs, the SIR decreased from a baseline of 1.391 in Year 1 to 0.720 in Year 2. C. diff. infections fell from 0.422 to 0.315 in Year 1 and to 0.260 in Year 2. While the MRSA SIR did not improve during the first year, the MRSA reduction sprint team showed success in Year 2 with a decrease in the SIR from 0.537 to 0.245. Readmission reduction sprint teams focused on heart failure, COPD, and total hip and knee complications. The teams also achieved positive results in reducing readmissions by following checklists and reviewing each readmission case for justification.

Practical applications: Rapid change can be safely and effectively implemented with multidisciplinary sprint teams. Developed with an evidence-based, case review approach, sprint team checklists can help to standardize processes for the review of any infections or readmissions that occur in the inpatient arena.

Goal: Accurate prediction of operating room (OR) time is critical for effective utilization of resources, optimal staffing, and reduced costs. Currently, electronic health record (EHR) systems aid OR scheduling by predicting OR time for a specific surgeon and operation. On many occasions, the predicted OR time is subject to manipulation by surgeons during scheduling. We aimed to address the use of the EHR for OR scheduling and the impact of manipulations on OR time accuracy.

Methods: Between April and August 2022, a pilot study was performed in our tertiary center where surgeons in multiple surgical specialties were encouraged toward nonmanipulation for predicted OR time during scheduling. The OR time accuracy within 5 months before trial (Group 1) and within the trial period (Group 2) were compared. Accurate cases were defined as cases with total length (wheels-in to wheels-out) within ±30 min or ±20% of the scheduled duration if the scheduled time is ≥ or <150 min, respectively. The study included single and multiple Current Procedural Terminology code procedures, while procedures involving multiple surgical specialties (combo cases) were excluded.

Principal findings: The study included a total of 8,821 operations, 4,243 (Group 1) and 4,578 (Group 2), (p < .001). The percentage of manipulation dropped from 19.8% (Group 1) to 7.6% (Group 2), (p < .001), while scheduling accuracy rose from 41.7% (Group 1) to 47.9% (Group 2), (p = .0001) with a significant reduction of underscheduling percentage (38.7% vs. 31.7%, p = .0001) and without a significant difference in the percentage of overscheduled cases (15% vs. 17%, p = .22). Inaccurate OR hours were reduced by 18% during the trial period (2,383 hr vs. 1,954 hr).

Practical applications: The utilization of EHR systems for predicting OR time and reducing manipulation by surgeons helps improve OR scheduling accuracy and utilization of OR resources.

Goal: The objective of this study was to evaluate satisfaction with work-life integration (WLI), social isolation, and the impact of work on personal relationships (IWPR) among senior healthcare operational leaders.

Methods: Between June 7 and June 30, 2021, we performed a national survey of CEOs and other senior healthcare operational leaders in the United States to evaluate their personal work experience. Satisfaction with WLI, social isolation, and IWPR were assessed using standardized instruments. Burnout and professional fulfillment were also assessed using standardized scales.

Principal findings: The mean IWPR score on the 0-10 scale was 4.39 (standard deviation was 2.36; higher scores were unfavorable). On multivariable analysis to identify demographic and professional factors associated with the IWPR score, each additional hour worked per week decreased the likelihood of a favorable IWPR score. The IWPR, feeling isolated, and satisfaction with WLI were independently associated with burnout after adjusting for other personal and professional factors. On multivariable analysis, healthcare administrators were more likely than U.S. workers in other fields to indicate work had adversely impacted personal relationships in response to the item "In the past year, my job has contributed to me feeling more isolated and detached from the people who are most important to me."

Practical applications: Experiencing an adverse IWPR is common among U.S. healthcare administrators, who are more likely than the general U.S. working population to indicate their job contributes to isolation and detachment from the people most important to them. Problems with WLI, isolation, and an adverse IWPR are associated with increased burnout and lower professional fulfillment. Intentional efforts by both organizations and administrative leaders are necessary to address the work characteristics and professional norms that erode WLI and result in work adversely impacting personal relationships.

Goal: As of January 1, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services requires most U.S. hospitals to publish pricing information on their website to help consumers make decisions regarding services and to transform negotiations with health insurers. For this study, we evaluated changes in hospitals' compliance with the federal price transparency rule after the first year of enactment, during which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services increased the penalty for noncompliance.

Methods: Using a nationally representative random sample of 470 hospitals, we assessed compliance with both parts of the hospital transparency rule (publishing a machine-readable price database and a consumer shopping tool) in the first quarter of 2022 and compared its baseline level in the first quarter of 2021. Using data from the American Hospital Association and Clarivate, we next assessed how compliance varied by hospital factors (ownership, number of beds, system membership, teaching status, type of electronic health record system), market factors (hospital and insurer market concentration), and the estimated change in penalty for noncompliance.

Principal findings: By early 2022, 46% of hospitals had posted both machine-readable and consumer-shoppable data, an increase of 24% from the prior year. Almost 9 in 10 hospitals had complied with the consumer-shoppable data requirement by early 2022. Larger hospitals and public hospitals had lower probabilities of baseline compliance with the machine-readable and consumer-shoppable requirements, respectively, although public hospitals were significantly more likely to become compliant with the consumer-shoppable requirement by 2022. Higher hospital market concentration was also associated with higher baseline compliance for both the machine-readable and consumer-shoppable requirements. Furthermore, our analyses found that hospitals with certain electronic health record systems were more likely to comply with the consumer-shoppable requirement in 2021 and became increasingly compliant with the machine-readable requirement in 2022. Finally, we found that hospitals with a larger estimated penalty were more likely to become compliant with the machine-readable requirement.

Practical applications: Longitudinal analyses of compliance with the federal price transparency rule are valuable for monitoring changes in hospitals' behavior and assessing whether compliance changes vary systematically for specific types of hospitals and/or market structures. Our results suggest a trend toward increased hospital compliance between 2021 and 2022. Although hospitals perceive the consumer-shopping tools as being the most impactful, the value of this information depends on whether it is comprehensible and comparable across hospitals. The new price transparency rule has facilitated the creation of new data that have the potential to significantly alte