Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500055
David Woods, Damian Illing, Jue Cao, Rajshri M Bolson, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi
Background: This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. Methods: A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft2) to calculate requirements for each procedure. Results: Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft2), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft2), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft2), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft2), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft2) and minor procedures (49 ft2). Conclusions: Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft2), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft2), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft2) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft2). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).
{"title":"Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study.","authors":"David Woods, Damian Illing, Jue Cao, Rajshri M Bolson, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. <b>Methods:</b> A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft<sup>2</sup>) to calculate requirements for each procedure. <b>Results:</b> Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft<sup>2</sup>), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft<sup>2</sup>), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft<sup>2</sup>) and minor procedures (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). <b>Conclusions:</b> Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft<sup>2</sup>), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft<sup>2</sup>) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon injury is a significant complication following distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plate fixation. We were unable to find any studies investigating the FPL tendon in relation to the distal radius in various functional hand positions. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate FPL tendon location in essential functional hand positions commonly encountered in daily life, including pulp pinch, key pinch, chuck grip, power grip, cylindrical grasp and spherical grasp. Methods: We assess the position of the FPL tendon and finger flexor tendons concerning the radius in various functional hand positions. Sixty-two wrists in 31 healthy volunteers were examined using transverse ultrasonography at the watershed area of the radius in six different functional hand positions, including pulp pinch, key pinch, chuck grip, power grip, cylindrical grasp and spherical grasp. Results: The shortest distance between the FPL tendon and radius was observed in the key pinch position with a mean of 3.37 mm, while the cylindrical grasp position showed the farthest distance with a mean of 4.21 mm. Conclusions: The location of the FPL tendon and finger flexor tendons varies across different functional hand positions. Our study shows that these tendons are closest to the radius when the hand is in the key pinch position. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Diagnostic).
{"title":"Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon Location in Various Functional Hand Positions.","authors":"Warot Ratanakoosakul, Navapong Anantavorasakul, Sopinan Siripoonyothai, Piyabuth Kittithamvongs, Kanchai Malungpaishrope, Chairoj Uerpairojkit","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon injury is a significant complication following distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plate fixation. We were unable to find any studies investigating the FPL tendon in relation to the distal radius in various functional hand positions. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate FPL tendon location in essential functional hand positions commonly encountered in daily life, including pulp pinch, key pinch, chuck grip, power grip, cylindrical grasp and spherical grasp. <b>Methods:</b> We assess the position of the FPL tendon and finger flexor tendons concerning the radius in various functional hand positions. Sixty-two wrists in 31 healthy volunteers were examined using transverse ultrasonography at the watershed area of the radius in six different functional hand positions, including pulp pinch, key pinch, chuck grip, power grip, cylindrical grasp and spherical grasp. <b>Results:</b> The shortest distance between the FPL tendon and radius was observed in the key pinch position with a mean of 3.37 mm, while the cylindrical grasp position showed the farthest distance with a mean of 4.21 mm. <b>Conclusions:</b> The location of the FPL tendon and finger flexor tendons varies across different functional hand positions. Our study shows that these tendons are closest to the radius when the hand is in the key pinch position. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500080
Harjoat Riyat, Holly Morris, Caroline Cheadle, Amanda Leatherbarrow, Dupinderjit Singh Rae, Nick Johnson
Background: Flexor sheath infections require prompt diagnosis, and management with intravenous antibiotics and/or surgical washout followed by hand therapy. Complication rates as high as 38% have been reported. Our unit takes a relatively conservative approach to the management of flexor sheath infections and select patients are managed non-surgically via our outpatient antibiotic service where they are clinically reviewed and receive a once daily dose of intravenous antibiotics. The aim of this study is to determine if outpatient management of flexor sheath infections was associated with an increased risk of complications compared to those admitted as an inpatient. Methods: A retrospective review was carried out with all patients clinically diagnosed with flexor sheath infection who were seen at our unit between January 2014 and December 2020. Age, gender, co-morbidities, cause of infection, management and subsequent complications were recorded. Results: A total of 128 patients with flexor sheath infections were treated. And 68% were male. Mean age was 50.4 years. A trend towards fewer presentations each year with animal bites, foreign bodies and penetrating trauma as the main cause of infection was noted. And 89% (n = 114) required admission with the other 11% (n = 14) treated as an outpatient. And 77% (n = 98) underwent surgical washout. And 6% (n = 8) suffered a complication. Conclusions: While flexor sheath washout continues to be standard practice, 23% of patients were safely managed with intravenous antibiotics and 11% purely via an outpatient service. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
{"title":"A 7-Year Retrospective Review of Flexor Sheath Infections.","authors":"Harjoat Riyat, Holly Morris, Caroline Cheadle, Amanda Leatherbarrow, Dupinderjit Singh Rae, Nick Johnson","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Flexor sheath infections require prompt diagnosis, and management with intravenous antibiotics and/or surgical washout followed by hand therapy. Complication rates as high as 38% have been reported. Our unit takes a relatively conservative approach to the management of flexor sheath infections and select patients are managed non-surgically via our outpatient antibiotic service where they are clinically reviewed and receive a once daily dose of intravenous antibiotics. The aim of this study is to determine if outpatient management of flexor sheath infections was associated with an increased risk of complications compared to those admitted as an inpatient. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review was carried out with all patients clinically diagnosed with flexor sheath infection who were seen at our unit between January 2014 and December 2020. Age, gender, co-morbidities, cause of infection, management and subsequent complications were recorded. <b>Results:</b> A total of 128 patients with flexor sheath infections were treated. And 68% were male. Mean age was 50.4 years. A trend towards fewer presentations each year with animal bites, foreign bodies and penetrating trauma as the main cause of infection was noted. And 89% (<i>n</i> = 114) required admission with the other 11% (<i>n</i> = 14) treated as an outpatient. And 77% (<i>n</i> = 98) underwent surgical washout. And 6% (<i>n</i> = 8) suffered a complication. <b>Conclusions:</b> While flexor sheath washout continues to be standard practice, 23% of patients were safely managed with intravenous antibiotics and 11% purely via an outpatient service. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500067
Harnoor-Khroud Dhillon, Djamila M Rojoa, Zaid Raheman, Nicholas Cereceda Monteoliva, Govind Dhillon, Firas J Raheman
Background: Diagnosis of ligamentous wrist injuries can be challenging with the absence of dynamic instability on radiographs. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) arthrography in diagnosing scapholunate ligament (SLL), lunotriquetral ligament (LTL) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. Methods: A systematic review and literature search were conducted in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42024517655). A mixed-effects logistic regression bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were constructed to determine diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography. Results: We identified five studies assessing the accuracy of CBCT arthrography against wrist arthrography or intraoperative findings as reference standard. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of CBCT arthrography was 93% (95% CI 40-100) and 91% (95% CI 81-96) for SLL injuries, 83% (95% CI 37-98) and 64% (95% CI 42-81) for LTL injuries and 78% (95% CI 57-91) and 80% (95% CI 54-93) for TFCC injuries. The area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), showing an excellent diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography in SLL injuries. CBCT arthrography had an estimated mean effective dose of 3.2 mSv (2.0-4.8). Conclusions: Our study confirms that CBCT arthrography has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for wrist ligamentous injuries with comparably high sensitivity to conventional arthrography and a better specificity. While further studies with more robust methodology are required to support its implementation in clinical practice, our analysis shows that it is a reliable option and has a promising future. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).
背景:腕部韧带损伤的诊断具有挑战性,因为在X光片上没有动态不稳定性。我们的目的是评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)关节造影术诊断肩胛韧带(SLL)、月锁韧带(LTL)和三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)损伤的准确性。方法:按照系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行了系统综述和文献检索,并在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42024517655)。该研究采用混合效应逻辑回归双变量模型来估算灵敏度和特异度,并构建了分层总结接收者操作特征曲线(HSROC)来确定CBCT关节造影的诊断准确性。结果:我们发现有五项研究评估了 CBCT 关节造影与腕关节造影或术中发现作为参考标准的准确性。CBCT关节造影对SLL损伤的敏感性和特异性的汇总估计分别为93%(95% CI 40-100)和91%(95% CI 81-96),对LTL损伤的敏感性和特异性分别为83%(95% CI 37-98)和64%(95% CI 42-81),对TFCC损伤的敏感性和特异性分别为78%(95% CI 57-91)和80%(95% CI 54-93)。曲线下面积为 0.91(95% CI 0.89-0.94),表明 CBCT 关节造影对 SLL 损伤的诊断准确性极高。CBCT 关节造影的估计平均有效剂量为 3.2 mSv (2.0-4.8)。结论:我们的研究证实,CBCT 关节造影术对腕关节韧带损伤具有极高的诊断准确性,其敏感性和特异性与传统关节造影术相当。虽然还需要更多采用更可靠方法的研究来支持其在临床实践中的应用,但我们的分析表明,它是一种可靠的选择,而且前景广阔。证据等级:三级(诊断)。
{"title":"The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Arthrography for Wrist Ligamentous Injuries - A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis.","authors":"Harnoor-Khroud Dhillon, Djamila M Rojoa, Zaid Raheman, Nicholas Cereceda Monteoliva, Govind Dhillon, Firas J Raheman","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diagnosis of ligamentous wrist injuries can be challenging with the absence of dynamic instability on radiographs. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) arthrography in diagnosing scapholunate ligament (SLL), lunotriquetral ligament (LTL) and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review and literature search were conducted in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42024517655). A mixed-effects logistic regression bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were constructed to determine diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography. <b>Results:</b> We identified five studies assessing the accuracy of CBCT arthrography against wrist arthrography or intraoperative findings as reference standard. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of CBCT arthrography was 93% (95% CI 40-100) and 91% (95% CI 81-96) for SLL injuries, 83% (95% CI 37-98) and 64% (95% CI 42-81) for LTL injuries and 78% (95% CI 57-91) and 80% (95% CI 54-93) for TFCC injuries. The area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), showing an excellent diagnostic accuracy of CBCT arthrography in SLL injuries. CBCT arthrography had an estimated mean effective dose of 3.2 mSv (2.0-4.8). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our study confirms that CBCT arthrography has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for wrist ligamentous injuries with comparably high sensitivity to conventional arthrography and a better specificity. While further studies with more robust methodology are required to support its implementation in clinical practice, our analysis shows that it is a reliable option and has a promising future. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500079
William L Wang, William H E Neal, S Steven Yang
Background: The purpose of this study was to conduct an updated survey of American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) membership to evaluate current preferences for surgical management of thumb CMC arthritis. Past surveys have demonstrated LRTI to be the most preferred surgical technique. We hypothesised that current surgical preferences for thumb CMC arthritis have changed over the last several years due to rising popularity of high-strength suture implants. Methods: A 22-question survey inquired about the preferences for the surgical management of basal joint arthritis and was sent to the ASSH membership. Descriptive statistics were calculated on all survey questions. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare differences in thumb CMC arthroplasty preferences across respondents. Results: A total of 1,499 responses were available for analysis, yielding a response rate of 29.9%. For surgical management of basal joint arthritis in the primary setting, the largest percentage of respondents preferred open trapeziectomy with suture suspension arthroplasty (39.2%); amongst them, over half (56%) used a high-strength suture implant. This was followed by open trapeziectomy with LRTI (38.3%). In the revision setting, most respondents preferred open trapeziectomy with suture suspension arthroplasty (53.5%), followed by LRTI (24.6%). In determining the choice of procedure, respondents felt some form of metacarpal suspension and implant cost to be more important factors than ligament reconstruction and interposition. A higher proportion of international members (16.2%) utilised implant arthroplasty than US/Canadian members (1.1%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Past surveys have demonstrated LRTI to be the most preferred surgical technique. The current survey demonstrates open trapeziectomy and suture suspension arthroplasty, especially using high-strength suture implants, gaining popularity amongst surgeons, while open trapeziectomy and LRTI decreasing in preference. Suture suspension arthroplasty is now the preferred surgical technique in both the primary and revision setting. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
{"title":"An Updated Survey of Trends in the Surgical Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis - The Increasing Popularity of the Suture Suspension Arthroplasty.","authors":"William L Wang, William H E Neal, S Steven Yang","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The purpose of this study was to conduct an updated survey of American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) membership to evaluate current preferences for surgical management of thumb CMC arthritis. Past surveys have demonstrated LRTI to be the most preferred surgical technique. We hypothesised that current surgical preferences for thumb CMC arthritis have changed over the last several years due to rising popularity of high-strength suture implants. <b>Methods:</b> A 22-question survey inquired about the preferences for the surgical management of basal joint arthritis and was sent to the ASSH membership. Descriptive statistics were calculated on all survey questions. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare differences in thumb CMC arthroplasty preferences across respondents. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,499 responses were available for analysis, yielding a response rate of 29.9%. For surgical management of basal joint arthritis in the primary setting, the largest percentage of respondents preferred open trapeziectomy with suture suspension arthroplasty (39.2%); amongst them, over half (56%) used a high-strength suture implant. This was followed by open trapeziectomy with LRTI (38.3%). In the revision setting, most respondents preferred open trapeziectomy with suture suspension arthroplasty (53.5%), followed by LRTI (24.6%). In determining the choice of procedure, respondents felt some form of metacarpal suspension and implant cost to be more important factors than ligament reconstruction and interposition. A higher proportion of international members (16.2%) utilised implant arthroplasty than US/Canadian members (1.1%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Past surveys have demonstrated LRTI to be the most preferred surgical technique. The current survey demonstrates open trapeziectomy and suture suspension arthroplasty, especially using high-strength suture implants, gaining popularity amongst surgeons, while open trapeziectomy and LRTI decreasing in preference. Suture suspension arthroplasty is now the preferred surgical technique in both the primary and revision setting. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Surgery is often offered to patients with mallet fractures that have a large, displaced fragment and/or joint subluxation. However, the surgical approach remains a subject of debate, and surgery is frequently associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. We felt that the angle formed by the fracture line and the long axis of the distal phalanx on a lateral view radiograph (fracture line angle [FLA]) could be useful in determining the appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the FLA and its distribution in mallet fractures. Methods: Three researchers measured the mallet FLA and the percentage of articular surface (PAS) involved in the lateral radiographs of 103 patients with a mallet fracture. Results: There was a strong correlation between the mallet FLA and the percentage of joint surface involvement between the three researchers. The mean FLA was 42.59° (±11.54) and it ranged from -1 to +1 standard deviation in 73 individuals (70.87%). The FLA varied over a wide range, while clustering near the average value. The average PAS involvement was 46.5% (±8.7%). There was no correlation between FLA and PAS involvement (p > 0.05). Conclusions: It is possible to quantify the mallet FLA accurately and consistently. It varies widely, regardless of the PAS involvement. When choosing the type of treatment and making prognostic predictions, the mallet FLA may be a helpful guide. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Diagnostic).
背景:槌状骨折患者如果有大块移位碎片和/或关节半脱位,通常需要进行手术治疗。然而,手术方法仍是一个争论不休的话题,而且手术效果往往不尽如人意。我们认为,侧位X光片上骨折线与远端指骨长轴形成的角度(骨折线角度[FLA])有助于确定适当的治疗策略。本研究旨在评估槌状骨折的 FLA 及其分布情况。方法:三位研究人员测量了 103 名槌状骨折患者侧位片上的槌状骨折线角(FLA)和受累关节面(PAS)的百分比。结果:103 名槌状骨折患者的槌状 FLA 与关节面(PAS)之间存在很强的相关性:三位研究人员的槌状FLA和关节面受累百分比之间存在很强的相关性。73名患者(70.87%)的平均FLA为42.59°(±11.54),标准偏差在-1到+1之间。FLA的变化范围很大,但都集中在平均值附近。PAS 平均参与度为 46.5%(±8.7%)。FLA 与 PAS 受累程度之间没有相关性(P > 0.05)。结论可以准确、一致地量化槌状 FLA。无论 PAS 是否受累,其差异都很大。在选择治疗类型和预测预后时,槌状 FLA 可能是一个有用的指南。证据等级:四级(诊断)。
{"title":"Assessment of Fracture Line Angle in Mallet Fractures.","authors":"Erdem Ateş, Ender Gümüşoğlu, Anıl Arikan, Metin Manouchehr Eskandari","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgery is often offered to patients with mallet fractures that have a large, displaced fragment and/or joint subluxation. However, the surgical approach remains a subject of debate, and surgery is frequently associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. We felt that the angle formed by the fracture line and the long axis of the distal phalanx on a lateral view radiograph (fracture line angle [FLA]) could be useful in determining the appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the FLA and its distribution in mallet fractures. <b>Methods:</b> Three researchers measured the mallet FLA and the percentage of articular surface (PAS) involved in the lateral radiographs of 103 patients with a mallet fracture. <b>Results:</b> There was a strong correlation between the mallet FLA and the percentage of joint surface involvement between the three researchers. The mean FLA was 42.59° (±11.54) and it ranged from -1 to +1 standard deviation in 73 individuals (70.87%). The FLA varied over a wide range, while clustering near the average value. The average PAS involvement was 46.5% (±8.7%). There was no correlation between FLA and PAS involvement (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> It is possible to quantify the mallet FLA accurately and consistently. It varies widely, regardless of the PAS involvement. When choosing the type of treatment and making prognostic predictions, the mallet FLA may be a helpful guide. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500043
Christopher J Dy, Roy S Horowitz, David M Brogan
Background: Advances in treatment philosophies and microsurgical techniques for peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) have led to improved outcomes. However, lack of standardisation in the evaluation of clinical outcomes after PNI treatment precludes the ability to compare reconstruction methods, such as nerve transfer, nerve grafting, free functioning muscle transfers and tendon transfers. To this end, our goal is to work collaboratively to establish a core outcome set to evaluate outcomes after PNI. Methods: The protocol for this arc of work, delineated in this manuscript, consists of two phases: (1) conducting a systematic review of how outcomes are currently reported following PNI and (2) a Delphi process to gain consensus on the measures to include in the core outcome set for PNI. In the Delphi process, two online rounds will be used to gather consensus on the importance of each outcome measure. A final round will be conducted in person to discuss and resolve measures for which there is not yet consensus and to finalise the core outcomes set. Conclusions: Through this process, a common standard for reporting outcomes after PNI will be created, facilitating collaboration and future research.
{"title":"Protocol to Develop a Core Outcomes Set for Peripheral Nerve Injury.","authors":"Christopher J Dy, Roy S Horowitz, David M Brogan","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Advances in treatment philosophies and microsurgical techniques for peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) have led to improved outcomes. However, lack of standardisation in the evaluation of clinical outcomes after PNI treatment precludes the ability to compare reconstruction methods, such as nerve transfer, nerve grafting, free functioning muscle transfers and tendon transfers. To this end, our goal is to work collaboratively to establish a core outcome set to evaluate outcomes after PNI. <b>Methods:</b> The protocol for this arc of work, delineated in this manuscript, consists of two phases: (1) conducting a systematic review of how outcomes are currently reported following PNI and (2) a Delphi process to gain consensus on the measures to include in the core outcome set for PNI. In the Delphi process, two online rounds will be used to gather consensus on the importance of each outcome measure. A final round will be conducted in person to discuss and resolve measures for which there is not yet consensus and to finalise the core outcomes set. <b>Conclusions:</b> Through this process, a common standard for reporting outcomes after PNI will be created, facilitating collaboration and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1142/S242483552550002X
Junichi Iijima, Yasuto Tajiri
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated surgically. Although the minimally invasive open surgical method is widely used, it is not possible to directly visualise the entire length of the carpal tunnel, especially the proximal end, which is on the side away from the skin incision. In this study, we performed a mini-open carpal tunnel release with endoscopic assistance to release the entire length of the carpal tunnel under direct vision and investigated the treatment outcomes. Methods: The surgical method included an incision of ≤2 cm in the palm, cutting of the transverse carpal ligament under direct vision and cutting of the forearm fascia under endoscopic vision. A uniquely designed sheath was used for the endoscopic resection. We investigated the sex, age, medical history, symptoms, examination findings, anaesthesia method, operation time, thenar motor branch variation, postoperative complications, presence or absence of pillar pain and final examination findings of the target patients. Results: A total of 100 hands (85 patients) were included. Anatomical variations of the thenar motor branches were observed in 19 hands. At the final follow-up, hand numbness improved in all patients, while mild numbness was observed in 25 hands. The abductor pollicis brevis muscle improved in all patients with paresis, but 8 of the 27 hands remained completely paralysed. Pillar pain was observed in 36 hands at 8 weeks postoperative, but the condition improved in all patients. The clinical outcomes of this study were good with no cases of major complications or reoperation. Conclusions: The minimally invasive open surgical method described here can be reliably used to release the forearm fascia proximal to the carpal tunnel. The thenar motor branch can also be confirmed under direct visualisation, making it a relatively safe and useful approach. Level of Evidence: Level Ⅳ (Therapeutic).
{"title":"Clinical Outcome of Endoscopically Assisted Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release.","authors":"Junichi Iijima, Yasuto Tajiri","doi":"10.1142/S242483552550002X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S242483552550002X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be treated surgically. Although the minimally invasive open surgical method is widely used, it is not possible to directly visualise the entire length of the carpal tunnel, especially the proximal end, which is on the side away from the skin incision. In this study, we performed a mini-open carpal tunnel release with endoscopic assistance to release the entire length of the carpal tunnel under direct vision and investigated the treatment outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> The surgical method included an incision of ≤2 cm in the palm, cutting of the transverse carpal ligament under direct vision and cutting of the forearm fascia under endoscopic vision. A uniquely designed sheath was used for the endoscopic resection. We investigated the sex, age, medical history, symptoms, examination findings, anaesthesia method, operation time, thenar motor branch variation, postoperative complications, presence or absence of pillar pain and final examination findings of the target patients. <b>Results:</b> A total of 100 hands (85 patients) were included. Anatomical variations of the thenar motor branches were observed in 19 hands. At the final follow-up, hand numbness improved in all patients, while mild numbness was observed in 25 hands. The abductor pollicis brevis muscle improved in all patients with paresis, but 8 of the 27 hands remained completely paralysed. Pillar pain was observed in 36 hands at 8 weeks postoperative, but the condition improved in all patients. The clinical outcomes of this study were good with no cases of major complications or reoperation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The minimally invasive open surgical method described here can be reliably used to release the forearm fascia proximal to the carpal tunnel. The thenar motor branch can also be confirmed under direct visualisation, making it a relatively safe and useful approach. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level Ⅳ (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500031
Simon B Kramer, Frederike Raad, Alexander Hauser, Inger B Schipper, Niels W L Schep
Background: Several studies have described pathology in relation to transverse sigmoid notch morphology, using the Tolat transverse sigmoid notch classification. It is believed that the entire shape of a sigmoid notch can be described using Tolat sigmoid types. We hypothesised that the determination of the sigmoid notch shape (SNS) depends on the level of the transverse CT plane on the axial axis of the distal radius. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the transverse SNS on different axial CT levels in the same wrist. Methods: The transverse SNS of 53 participants were independently qualitatively classified by two researchers in accordance with the four morphologies described by Tolat et al. The SNS was determined at two levels on the axial axis of the distal radius; at the level of the most prominent part of Lister tubercle, determined on the sagittal plane and at the level of the 'smallest distance between the ulnar head and sigmoid notch' (SDUS). Results: Forty-seven percent of the wrists demonstrated different SNS types according to Tolat classification, depending on the axial level of the CT scan. Interobserver agreement on the transverse sigmoid shape was 87% at Lister tubercle and 85% at SDUS, which can both be interpreted as 'excellent'. Conclusions: Despite an excellent interobserver agreement, 47% of the study population had different transverse sigmoid notch types within the same wrist. We, therefore, conclude that Tolat transverse sigmoid classification may not be useful for the description of potential pathology in relation to the sigmoid notch morphology.
{"title":"The Transverse Sigmoid Notch Morphology Unravelled.","authors":"Simon B Kramer, Frederike Raad, Alexander Hauser, Inger B Schipper, Niels W L Schep","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Several studies have described pathology in relation to transverse sigmoid notch morphology, using the Tolat transverse sigmoid notch classification. It is believed that the entire shape of a sigmoid notch can be described using Tolat sigmoid types. We hypothesised that the determination of the sigmoid notch shape (SNS) depends on the level of the transverse CT plane on the axial axis of the distal radius. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the transverse SNS on different axial CT levels in the same wrist. <b>Methods:</b> The transverse SNS of 53 participants were independently qualitatively classified by two researchers in accordance with the four morphologies described by Tolat et al. The SNS was determined at two levels on the axial axis of the distal radius; at the level of the most prominent part of Lister tubercle, determined on the sagittal plane and at the level of the 'smallest distance between the ulnar head and sigmoid notch' (SDUS). <b>Results:</b> Forty-seven percent of the wrists demonstrated different SNS types according to Tolat classification, depending on the axial level of the CT scan. Interobserver agreement on the transverse sigmoid shape was 87% at Lister tubercle and 85% at SDUS, which can both be interpreted as 'excellent'. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite an excellent interobserver agreement, 47% of the study population had different transverse sigmoid notch types within the same wrist. We, therefore, conclude that Tolat transverse sigmoid classification may not be useful for the description of potential pathology in relation to the sigmoid notch morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525400016
Daniel C Gabriel, Leah Demetri, Dafang Zhang
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper extremity compressive neuropathy. The reference standard for the diagnosis of CTS remains an area of controversy. The diagnosis can be established clinically, but options for confirmatory testing include electrodiagnostic studies, ultrasound and diagnostic aids such as the CTS-6 score. This review article summarises the current evidence for each confirmatory testing modality, contrasts their advantages and disadvantages and discusses future directions for investigation. Level of Evidence: Level V (Diagnostic).
{"title":"The Role of Confirmatory Testing in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Electrodiagnostic Study, Ultrasound and CTS-6.","authors":"Daniel C Gabriel, Leah Demetri, Dafang Zhang","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525400016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525400016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper extremity compressive neuropathy. The reference standard for the diagnosis of CTS remains an area of controversy. The diagnosis can be established clinically, but options for confirmatory testing include electrodiagnostic studies, ultrasound and diagnostic aids such as the CTS-6 score. This review article summarises the current evidence for each confirmatory testing modality, contrasts their advantages and disadvantages and discusses future directions for investigation. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level V (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}