Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume最新文献

Forearm non-union poses a challenge in orthopaedic surgery due to its intricate anatomy and functional significance. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment, diagnosis and management of forearm non-union. Initial evaluation involves a meticulous history, physical examination and imaging studies to identify factors contributing to non-union, including infection. Surgical approaches are discussed, with emphasis on restoring biomechanical stability and promoting bone healing. Treatment options range from autografts to allografts, with considerations for vascularised bone transfers in complex cases. Decision-making strategies are outlined, considering patient-specific factors and individualised treatment plans. Special considerations for specific types of forearm non-unions are addressed, along with postoperative care protocols to optimise healing and functional outcomes. Overall, this review aims to provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of forearm non-union management based on current evidence and clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Electrical stimulation has been integrated in recent decades into rehabilitation protocols following neuromuscular injuries. Existing literature supports the utilisation of prolonged or continuous stimulation generated by implantable or transcutaneous devices for chronic pain subsidence and muscle trophism maintenance, which improve outcomes following microsurgical interventions. Newer uses include brief electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury. Brief electrical stimulation has shown promise in expediting regeneration of both torn and crushed nerve axons in the murine model and has been incorporated into a limited number of clinical studies. Augmentation of the natural response of an injured peripheral nerve by electrical stimulation has the potential to accelerate regeneration, presumably leading to improved function and clinical outcomes. We review the existing literature on intraoperative utilisation of electrical stimulation to enhance regeneration, such as neural mechanisms of action and their microscopic effect in animal models, as well as results from initial human studies. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Arthroplasty of the small joints of the hand and fingers is a complex problem facing the hand surgeon. Pyrocarbon implants have been available for several decades. They were originally thought to provide better functional outcomes than silicone implants in patients, mostly due to recreation of the joint anatomy. In a recent publication, pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthroplasty was found to have a higher complication and revision rate. We present a patient with pyrocarbon metallosis of the PIPJ in a revision arthroplasty procedure. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Background: WALANT has gained much popularity in recent years, especially with COVID-19. However, a recent survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership (i.e. attendings/consultants) showed that only 17% were exposed to WALANT during residency or fellowship training. There is much interest in WALANT from trainees, but interpretation of the type and volume to be administered is highly varied. Methods: The aims of this study were (1) to survey a group of plastic surgery trainees in the UK about their knowledge of WALANT formulas, and (2) to compare trainee logbook records of WALANT procedures (if available) with published data from the UK. Results: All trainees were familiar with the 'standard' WALANT formula (1% lidocaine, 1:100,000 adrenaline ± 8.4% NaHCO₃) described by Lalonde. However, because of local formularies, rather than 1:100,000 adrenaline, all used 1:200,000 adrenaline as it comes premixed in the UK. Other formulas used by UK trainees included 0.5% bupivacaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline, and mixing 1% lidocaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline with 1% lidocaine 1:1. In comparing available trainee WALANT records with published UK data, the average volume of WALANT used was 6.6 mls in the current study versus 12.9 mls for similar procedures (wound debridement and skin closure ± local flap, digital nerve repair, fingertip reconstruction, thenar injuries, phalangeal fracture and single digit extensor repair); specifically, for single digit flexor tendon repairs, this was 10 mls versus 16.3 mls. Conclusions: While the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have developed official guidance for the use of WALANT in the UK, it appears there remains much variation in interpretation and hence, application. Comparison of trainee logbook records of common hand surgery procedures suggests that most can be done with much less WALANT administered than previously reported, with safe and reproducible results. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Background: Intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) can result in poor outcomes if inadequately treated. Dynamic external fixation and internal fixation with plates and/or screws are two treatment options. The role of combining these two methods is unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the outcomes of patients with intra-articular fractures of the PIPJ treated with a combination of dynamic external fixation with a plate and/or screws. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 18 consecutive cases of intra-articular fractures of the PIPJ treated with pins and rubber band traction system (PRTS) combined with dorsal internal fixation with plates and/or screws. The patients' average age was 51 years (range: 20-81 years). The fracture patterns were volar-type (n = 2), dorsal-type (n = 4) and pilon-type (n = 12). Data with regard to time to surgery, interphalangeal joint range of motion, grip strength, VAS for pain, Quick DASH score, complications, duration of follow-up and return to work were collected. Results: The levels of articular involvement were stable (n = 1), tenuous (n = 5) and unstable (n = 12). The average time to surgery was 9 days, and the average follow-up period was 15 months. The fracture was fixed with a dorsal plate and screws in 10 patients and with only screws in eight patients. All patients had PRTS. All patients returned to their original occupation and the fractures united in good alignment. The average grip strength was 86% of that of the unaffected side. The average active PIPJ motion was 85° (range: 50°-106°), and the average active distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) motion was 48° (range: 10°-90°). Conclusions: Our results show that a combination of PRTS and open reduction and fixation with plate and/or screws achieved a good range of motion and articular reduction. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Distal humerus intra-articular comminuted open fracture is a challenging injury, with nonunion, infection and stiffness considered as major concerns. We report a 58-year-old woman who was admitted to the emergency department from a car accident, sustaining an open wound with severe comminution of distal humerus and complete articular fracture, classified as AO/OTA 13C2 and Gustillo Anderson type IIIA. Debridement and external fixation was done first, followed by open reduction and internal fixation with fibular strut allograft. The patient showed excellent results in radiological and functional outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Background: We devised a new classification of hamate fractures named the TOUCH classification. Each letter of this acronym depicts a fracture type - Type I (Transverse fracture), Type II (Open and/or complex fracture), Type III (Ulnar/medial tuberosity fracture), Type IV (Coronal fracture) and Type V (Hook fracture). Each fracture type was further divided into two or three subtypes (a, b, and/or c) based on degree of severity. The aim of this study is to classify the hamate fractures treated at our centre using this classification. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with hamate fractures treated at our hospital between 2003 and 2022 was done. Patient data with regard to age, gender, mechanism of injury, injured limb and any associated injuries was collected. Hamate fractures were classified based on the TOUCH classification. Results: A total of 247 patients with hamate fractures were included. Patients in the age group of 20-40 years accounted for 73.6% of all fractures. Female patients accounted for only 6.9% of all fractures and 76.5% of women with hamate fractures were older than 40 years. The incidence of hamate fracture tended to increase with age in women. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall (69 patients). The injury involved the right upper limb in 195 patients. And 164 patients had associated injuries in the same upper limb. Type III (coronal fracture of the hamate body) accounted for 57.4%, followed by type V (hook of hamate fracture) in 26.7% of patients. Conclusions: The TOUCH classification could cover all kinds of hamate fractures. It is easy to remember and may guide surgeons in considering treatment options. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Diagnostic).

Background: Perilunate fracture-dislocations are frequently associated with a high risk of developing post-traumatic arthritis. Current studies indicate that during mid-term follow-ups, radiological signs of arthritis do not appear to correspond with functional score. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of posttraumatic arthritis and the wrist function after perilunate dislocations (PLD) and fracture dislocations at a mid-term follow-up of 7 years. Methods: We report the clinical and radiological outcomes of 17 wrists treated for PLD or fracture-dislocation by open reduction and internal fixation through a dorsal approach with dorsal ligament repair. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the short version of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire (PRWE) and the Mayo Wrist Score (MWS). Results of radiographs were assessed using the Herzberg Radiological Scoring Chart. Results: The MWS showed five excellent, five good, five fair and two poor results with an average score of 81%. Radiological analysis using the Herzberg classification revealed midcarpal and/or radiocarpal arthritis in 65% of cases, lunate collapse in 59% and an increase in the mean ulnar translocation ratio in 53% of the cases. Complications included one case of lunate osteonecrosis and one case of stage 3 scapholunate advanced collapse that required revision surgery. Conclusions: Although the clinical and functional outcomes are favourable at mid-term follow-up, radiological evaluation shows a progression towards osteoarthritis (OA). Further research is warranted to refine treatment strategies and investigate factors influencing the development of OA. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Background: A high incidence of ulnar nerve-related complications has been reported in open reduction and internal fixation for distal humerus fractures (DHFs). To minimise ulnar nerve damage, we used a percutaneous medial screw combined with a posterolateral plate in the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complications and functional outcomes of this method. Methods: Data from patients aged over 65 who underwent this surgical procedure for DHFs at a single Level I trauma centre from 2013 to 2021 were extracted. Postoperative complications, reoperations, mean range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) scores and Hand20 scores were retrospectively evaluated. All patients in this study received postoperative rehabilitation by hand therapists at our hospital. Results: We identified 28 patients treated with this method. The mean follow-up period was 8.6 ± 3.7 months. The median intraoperative time was 125 minutes (interquartile range: 105-157 minutes). None of the patients developed ulnar nerve neuropathy, but one patient (3.7%) experienced radial nerve dysfunction. Two patients (7.4%) had nonunion. Implant failure occurred in three patients (11.1%) due to migration of the medial screw. One patient (3.7%) amongst them underwent reoperation. The mean flexion to extension arc was 97 ± 18°, 116 ± 19°, and 116 ± 19° at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups, respectively. According to the MEPI, 20 patients achieved excellent results, seven patients achieved good results and one patient achieved a fair result at the last follow-up. The median Hand20 score was 4.3 (interquartile range: 2.1-14.0) at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: The posterolateral plate and medial screw method showed good functional outcomes and few nerve-related complications. This modified method might be a better option for DHFs in elderly patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).