Pub Date : 1997-06-01DOI: 10.1177/103530469700800113
C. Nyland
The review and analysis of the book 'Managing Together: Consultation and Participation in the Workplace' by Edward M. Davis and Russell D. Lansbury is discussed. The book has brought together fourteen contributions that analyze specific aspects of the recent Australian and overseas experience related to worker participation in the management process and shop floor practice. Review(s) of: Managing Together: Consultation and Participation in the Workplace, by Edward M. Davis and Russell D. Lansbury (eds), Addison Wesley Longman, Sydney, 1996, xvi + 270pp.
本文对爱德华·m·戴维斯和拉塞尔·d·兰斯伯里合著的《共同管理:工作场所的协商和参与》一书进行了回顾和分析。这本书汇集了14篇文章，分析了最近澳大利亚和海外有关工人参与管理过程和车间实践的具体方面。《共同管理:工作场所的协商与参与》，Edward M. Davis和Russell D. Lansbury主编，Addison Wesley Longman，悉尼，1996年，第16 + 270页。
{"title":"Book Review: Managing Together: Consultation and Participation in the Workplace","authors":"C. Nyland","doi":"10.1177/103530469700800113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/103530469700800113","url":null,"abstract":"The review and analysis of the book 'Managing Together: Consultation and Participation in the Workplace' by Edward M. Davis and Russell D. Lansbury is discussed. The book has brought together fourteen contributions that analyze specific aspects of the recent Australian and overseas experience related to worker participation in the management process and shop floor practice. Review(s) of: Managing Together: Consultation and Participation in the Workplace, by Edward M. Davis and Russell D. Lansbury (eds), Addison Wesley Longman, Sydney, 1996, xvi + 270pp.","PeriodicalId":51718,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Labour Relations Review","volume":"81 1","pages":"168 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/103530469700800113","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65853409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought [Book Review]","authors":"J. Langmore","doi":"10.5860/choice.33-6410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-6410","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51718,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Labour Relations Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71051523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper examines some of the main arguments relating to the effect of privatization on efficiency. It is concerned with both narrow economic issues and wider political issues. After a critical examination of some theories, which assert that private ownership is intrinsically more efficient than public ownership, it is argued that for large scale enterprise there are no strong economic reasons for believing in the superiority of private enterprise. As long as the government in question has the will and the power to make a public enterprise junction in a socially efficient fashion, the public enterprise may be just as efficient as private enterprise whilst offering additional economic and social advantages.
{"title":"The Political Economy of Privatization","authors":"Bob Rowthorn, Ha-Joon Chang","doi":"10.4324/9780203984048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984048","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines some of the main arguments relating to the effect of privatization on efficiency. It is concerned with both narrow economic issues and wider political issues. After a critical examination of some theories, which assert that private ownership is intrinsically more efficient than public ownership, it is argued that for large scale enterprise there are no strong economic reasons for believing in the superiority of private enterprise. As long as the government in question has the will and the power to make a public enterprise junction in a socially efficient fashion, the public enterprise may be just as efficient as private enterprise whilst offering additional economic and social advantages.","PeriodicalId":51718,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Labour Relations Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70605903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1991-06-01DOI: 10.1177/103530469100200105
Michael Angwin
There has been little empirical research into enterprise and workplace industrial relations. The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey fills a major void. This paper examines the results of this Survey. It challenges the ‘industrial relations' perspective adopted as well as some of the major conclusions, particularly those relating to industrial relations constraints upon flexibility. The paper also compares the findings with those of the Business Council's Industrial Relations Study Commission.
{"title":"Myths and Realities: A Review of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey","authors":"Michael Angwin","doi":"10.1177/103530469100200105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/103530469100200105","url":null,"abstract":"There has been little empirical research into enterprise and workplace industrial relations. The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey fills a major void. This paper examines the results of this Survey. It challenges the ‘industrial relations' perspective adopted as well as some of the major conclusions, particularly those relating to industrial relations constraints upon flexibility. The paper also compares the findings with those of the Business Council's Industrial Relations Study Commission.","PeriodicalId":51718,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Labour Relations Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"57 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"1991-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/103530469100200105","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65853333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：