GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology最新文献

Background and aims: Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has known a great evolution in the last decades. Imaging techniques evolved from imaging with only standard white light endoscopes toward high-definition resolution endoscopes and the use of multiple color enhancement techniques, over to automated endoscopic assessment systems based on artificial intelligence. This narrative literature review aimed to provide a detailed overview on the latest evolutions within the field of advanced GI endoscopy, mainly focusing on the screening, diagnosis, and surveillance of common upper and lower GI pathology.

Methods: This review comprises only literature about screening, diagnosis, and surveillance strategies using advanced endoscopic imaging techniques published in (inter)national peer-reviewed journals and written in English. Studies with only adult patients included were selected. A search was performed using MESH terms: dye-based chromoendoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, video enhancement technique, upper GI tract, lower GI tract, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, colorectal polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, artificial intelligence. This review does not elaborate on the therapeutic application or impact of advanced GI endoscopy.

Conclusions: Focusing on current and future applications and evolutions in the field of both upper and lower GI advanced endoscopy, this overview is a practical but detailed projection of the latest developments. Within this review, an active leap toward artificial intelligence and its recent developments in GI endoscopy was made. Additionally, the literature is weighted against the current international guidelines and assessed for its potential positive future impact.

Introduction: Sorafenib was the first therapy used for systemic treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Multiple prognosis factors associated with sorafenib therapy have been described.

Objectives: The aim of this work was to evaluate survival and time to progression (TTP) on HCC patients treated with sorafenib, and check for predictive factors of sorafenib benefit.

Materials and methods: Retrospectively, data from all HCC patients treated with sorafenib in a Liver Unit from 2008 to 2018 were collected and analyzed.

Results: Sixty-eight patients were included; 80.9% were male, the median age was 64.5 years, 57.4% had Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and 77.9% were BCLC stage C. Macrovascular invasion (MVI) was present in 25% of the patients and 25% of the subjects had other extrahepatic metastasis. The median survival was 10 months (IQR 6.0-14.8) and median TTP was 5 months (IQR 2.0-7.0). Survival and TTP were similar between Child-Pugh A and B patients: 11.0 months (IQR 6.0-18.0) for Child-Pugh A and 9.0 months (IQR 5.0-14.0) for Child-Pugh B (p = 0.336). In univariate analysis, larger lesion size (LS >5 cm), higher alpha-fetoprotein (AFP >50 ng/mL), and no history of locoregional therapy were statistically associated with mortality (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.24-3.81; HR 3.49, 95% CI 1.90-6.42; HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.93, respectively), but only LS and AFP were independent predictive factors, as shown in multivariate analysis (LS: HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.10-3.96; AFP: HR 3.13, 95% CI 1.59-6.16). MVI and LS >5 cm were associated with TTP shorter than 5 months in univariate analysis (MVI: HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.47-5.35; LS: HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.08-4.11), but only MVI was an independent predictive factor of TTP shorter than 5 months (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.72-6.81). Regarding safety data, 76.5% of patients reported at least one side effect (any grade), and 19.1% presented grade III-IV adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation.

Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in survival or TTP in Child-Pugh A or Child-Pugh B patients treated with sorafenib, as compared to more recent real-life studies. Lower primary LS and AFP were associated with a better outcome, and lower AFP was the main predictor of survival. The reality of systemic treatment for advanced HCC has recently changed and continues to evolve, but sorafenib remains a viable therapeutic option.

Background and aims: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, comparable to a large extent to other organ insufficiencies. The need for palliative care (PC) in patients with ESLD is high. In Portugal, in the only identified study, more than 80% of patients hospitalized with ESLD had criteria for PC. No results specified which needs they identified or their transplantation prospect status.

Methods: Prospective observational study including 54 ESLD patients who presented to a university hospital and transplantation center, between November 2019 and September 2020. Assessment of their PC needs through the application of NECPAL CCOMS-ICO^© and IPOS, considering their transplantation perspective status.

Results: Of the 54 patients, 5 (9.3%) were on active waiting list for transplantation and 8 (14.8%) under evaluation. NECPAL CCOMS-ICO^© identified 23 patients (n = 42.6%) that would benefit from PC. Assessment of PC needs by clinicians, functional markers and significant comorbidities were the most frequent criteria (47.8%, n = 11). IPOS also revealed a different sort of needs: on average, each patient identified about 9 needs (8.9 ±2.8). Among the symptoms identified, weakness (77.8%), reduced mobility (70.3%), and pain (48.1%) stood out, as well as the psychoemotional symptoms of depression (66.7%) and anxiety (77.8%). There were no significant differences between the subgroups of patients analyzed. Only 4 patients (7.4%) were followed by the PC team.

Conclusion: All the ESLD patients included, independently of the group they belonged to, presented with PC needs. No significant differences between the subgroups of patients were identified, confirming that even patients with a transplantation prospect have important needs for PC.

Introduction: With the increase of esophageal and gastric cancer, surgery will be more often performed. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared postoperative complications of gastroesophageal surgery. It can be managed by conservative, endoscopic (such as endoscopic vacuum therapy and stenting), or surgical methods, but optimal treatment remains controversial. The aim of our meta-analysis was to compare (a) endoscopic and surgical interventions and (b) different endoscopic treatments for AL following gastroesophageal cancer surgery.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis, with search in three online databases for studies evaluating surgical and endoscopic treatments for AL following gastroesophageal cancer surgery.

Results: A total of 32 studies comprising 1,080 patients were included. Compared with surgical intervention, endoscopic treatment presented similar clinical success, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay, but lower in-hospital mortality (6.4% [95% CI: 3.8-9.6%] vs. 35.8% [95% CI: 23.9-48.5%]. Endoscopic vacuum therapy was associated with a lower rate of complications (OR 0.348 [95% CI: 0.127-0.954]), shorter ICU length of stay (mean difference -14.77 days [95% CI: -26.57 to -2.98]), and time until AL resolution (17.6 days [95% CI: 14.1-21.2] vs. 39.4 days [95% CI: 27.0-51.8]) when compared with stenting, but there were no significant differences in terms of clinical success, mortality, reinterventions, or hospital length of stay.

Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment, in particular endoscopic vacuum therapy, seems safer and more effective when compared with surgery. However, more robust comparative studies are needed, especially for clarifying which is the best treatment in specific situations (according to patient and leak characteristics).

Introduction: The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) identified the need to benchmark the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and produced a set of performance measures (PM). The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the accordance of the PM for SBCE in two Portuguese centers with different SBCE platforms.

Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of consecutive SBCE performed in an 18-month period in 2 Portuguese centers that used two different SBCE platforms Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seoul, South Korea) and PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel). A total of 10 PM (6 key, 4 minor) were evaluated and compared between the 2 centers.

Results: A total of 493 SBCE were included. The minimum standard established by ESGE was reached in 3/6 key PM (complete visualization, lesion detection rate, and capsule retention rate), and none of the 4 minor PM. PM compliance significantly differed between the 2 centers: complete small bowel visualization 95.9 and 90% (p = 0.01), diagnostic yield 50.6 and 63% (p = 0.005), adequate small bowel cleansing level according to Brotz scale 69.54 and 84.6% (p ≤ 0.001), patients with high risk of capsule retention offered a patency capsule 4.2 and 73% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion: This study highlights and critically discusses technical and organizational issues that should be considered in defining more realistic PM thresholds, aiming to improve SBCE quality.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a very rare vascular neoplasm, which is often multifocal or metastatic at diagnosis. Most frequently arises in the liver, followed by the lung and bones. The authors present a case of a liver transplant recipient who developed a pattern of hepatic cholestasis associated with the appearance of a proliferative hepatic lesion with infiltrative growth. Histological examination and immunohistochemical study were compatible with the diagnosis of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. Pulmonary micronodules were detected and lung metastases were hypothesized. Therefore, bronchoscopy was performed, which turned out to be normal, and cytology was negative for neoplastic cells. After a multidisciplinary discussion, liver re-transplantation was decided. After 8 years of follow-up, the patient is clinically stable, with no graft dysfunction, no neoplastic recurrence, and dimensional stability of the pulmonary micronodules. Patients with organ transplant have higher risk of developing carcinoma compared to the general population. The development of cancer is a multifactorial process and little is known about the etiology of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. No standard treatment strategy has been defined yet, and the natural course of the disease is heterogenous and the individual prognosis unpredictable. Complete surgical resection is offered to patients with unifocal disease, and those with unresectable disease should be evaluated for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Severe acute liver injury (ALI) is mostly triggered by viral infections and hepatotoxic drugs; however, it can also be seen in systemic diseases. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, immune-mediated syndrome that presents as a life-threatening inflammatory disorder affecting multiple organs. Secondary causes occur mainly in the set of malignancy, infection, and autoimmune disease, and are seldom triggered by vaccination. Although liver involvement is common, presentation as severe ALI is rare. We describe a case of a 65-year-old male with history of low-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia and rheumatoid arthritis treated with prednisolone who presented with persistent fever and jaundice 1 week after COVID-19 vaccination. The diagnosis was challenging given the predominant liver impairment, characterized by hyperbilirubinemia, transaminases over 1,000 U/L, and prolonged INR, which prompted an extensive investigation and exclusion of autoimmune, toxic, and viral causes of hepatitis. Laboratory workup revealed bicytopenia, hyperferritinemia, which together with organ failure and evidence of hemophagocytosis in bone marrow suggested the diagnosis of HLH. After excluding infectious etiologies, flare of rheumatological disease, and the progression of hematological disease, HLH was diagnosed. He was successfully treated with etoposide and corticosteroids, with dramatic improvement of liver tests. After exclusion of other causes of secondary HLH, the recent vaccination for COVID-19 was the likely trigger. We report a case of double rarity of HLH, as it presented with severe liver dysfunction which was probably triggered by vaccination. In this case, the predominant liver involvement urged extensive investigation of liver disease, so a high index of suspicion was required to make an early diagnosis. Clinicians should consider HLH in patients with unexplained signs and symptoms of systemic inflammatory response and multiorgan involvement, including severe liver involvement as the first presentation.

Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD.

Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ± 2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%).

Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam.

Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure.

Introduction: Malignant biliary obstruction drainage is essential, since jaundice is associated with morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the recommended procedure for biliary drainage, with percutaneous biliary drainage being the classic alternative in cases of unsuccessful ERCP. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage has been emerged as a new option, with EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) being considered an effective and safe method in the drainage of distal obstructions of the common bile duct.

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-CDS performed in patients with distal malignant biliary obstructions, after failed ERCP.

Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study between July 2017 and June 2022 including all consecutive patients submitted to EUS-CDS in our center. The primary outcomes were "technical success" and "clinical success," defined as "resolution of jaundice or improvement in total serum bilirubin level above 50% at 7th day and above 75% at 30th day after the procedure." Secondary outcomes were procedure-related adverse events, endoscopic reintervention, and survival time.

Results: EUS-CDS was performed in 20 patients (65.0% male; median age 76 years). The most frequent etiology for the biliary obstruction was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 17; 85.0%), and most patients presented at advanced stages of cancer (12/60% in stages III or IV). ERCP failure was mainly due to the presence of obstruction in the duodenal lumen (n = 11; 55.0%). Fully covered metallic stents were used in all patients, mostly HotAxios^TM (n = 15; 75.0%). The technical success rate was 100%, and the clinical success rate was 89.5% (n = 17/19) at 7th day and 93.3% (n = 14/15) at 30th day. Four patients (20.0%) developed cholangitis within the first 30 days after the procedure; there were no late complications, and no patient died as a complication of the procedure. In 2 patients (10.0%), endoscopic reintervention was necessary due to stent migration, incidentally detected. Median survival was 93 days (minimum 5-maximum 751).

Conclusion: EUS-CDS was effective in biliary decompression of malignant obstructions of the common bile duct, with high clinical success and a favorable safety profile.