首页 > 最新文献

Environmental DNA最新文献

英文 中文
Optimization and application of bacterial environmental DNA and RNA isolation for qualitative and quantitative studies 用于定性和定量研究的细菌环境 DNA 和 RNA 分离的优化和应用
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.589
Daniel J. Browne, Catherine M. Miller, Emily P. O'Hara, Robert Courtney, Jamie Seymour, Denise L. Doolan, Ryan Orr

Molecular detection of environmental DNA (eDNA) and RNA (eRNA) allows highly sensitive qualitative (i.e., presence or absence) and quantitative (i.e., abundance) monitoring of aquatic bacteria. However, bacterial molecular diagnostics are limited by low positive predictive values. Protocols for bacterial eDNA and eRNA molecular monitoring have primarily focused on optimizing specimen collection, and the optimal method to purify bacterial nucleic material from postcollection aquatic specimens to maximize the analytical sensitivity of molecular diagnostics remains poorly defined. Accordingly, strategies to isolate bacterial eDNA and eRNA from fresh and saltwater were investigated. We evaluated two filtration and four nucleic acid purification systems as representative of current generation bacterial eDNA and eRNA isolation strategies for capacity to isolate bacterial eDNA and eRNA from prelysed (i.e., free-nucleic acids) and viable (i.e., colony forming units, CFU) bacterial cells. We also compared the sensitivities of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and metagenomic shotgun microbiome sequencing. The optimal protocol used 0.7 μm borosilicate glass filters (Whatman plc) followed by extraction with the RNeasy PowerWater kit (Qiagen). The protocol had a very high analytical sensitivity (10−3–100 ng and 102–101 CFU detected in 500 mL) across multiple species of bacteria, when tested with either RTqPCR or metagenomic sequencing. Importantly, this study highlighted several limitations which are restrictive to both qualitative and quantitative bacterial eDNA and eRNA studies. First, a 12-h time course between sampling and extraction revealed significant species-specific changes in cell number and free-nucleic acid concentrations can occur postspecimen collection. Second, we found Gram-positive bacteria yielded less nucleic material compared to Gram-negative bacteria suggesting bacterial eDNA and eRNA studies could be biased by microorganism genome stability and extraction efficiency. This study highlights the need to define the species-specific diagnostic sensitivity of a protocol when monitoring aquatic bacterial eDNA and eRNA with molecular diagnostics.

通过对环境 DNA (eDNA) 和 RNA (eRNA) 进行分子检测,可以对水生细菌进行高灵敏度的定性(即存在或不存在)和定量(即丰度)监测。然而,细菌分子诊断受限于较低的阳性预测值。细菌 eDNA 和 eRNA 分子监测方案主要侧重于优化标本采集,而从采集后的水生标本中纯化细菌核物质以最大限度提高分子诊断分析灵敏度的最佳方法仍未确定。因此,我们研究了从淡水和海水中分离细菌 eDNA 和 eRNA 的策略。我们评估了两套过滤系统和四套核酸纯化系统,它们代表了当前新一代细菌 eDNA 和 eRNA 分离策略,可从预溶(即游离核酸)和存活(即菌落形成单位,CFU)的细菌细胞中分离出细菌 eDNA 和 eRNA。我们还比较了反转录定量 PCR(RT-qPCR)和元基因组枪式微生物组测序的灵敏度。最佳方案是使用 0.7 μm 硼硅酸盐玻璃过滤器(Whatman plc),然后用 RNeasy PowerWater 试剂盒(Qiagen)进行提取。在使用 RTqPCR 或元基因组测序进行测试时,该方案对多种细菌具有极高的分析灵敏度(500 mL 中检测到 10-3-100 纳克和 102-101 CFU)。重要的是,这项研究强调了几个限制细菌 eDNA 和 eRNA 定性和定量研究的局限性。首先,从采样到提取的 12 小时时间过程显示,样本采集后细胞数量和游离核酸浓度会发生显著的物种特异性变化。其次,我们发现与革兰氏阴性菌相比,革兰氏阳性菌产生的核物质较少,这表明细菌 eDNA 和 eRNA 研究可能会受到微生物基因组稳定性和提取效率的影响。这项研究强调,在使用分子诊断技术监测水生细菌 eDNA 和 eRNA 时,有必要确定方案对特定物种的诊断灵敏度。
{"title":"Optimization and application of bacterial environmental DNA and RNA isolation for qualitative and quantitative studies","authors":"Daniel J. Browne,&nbsp;Catherine M. Miller,&nbsp;Emily P. O'Hara,&nbsp;Robert Courtney,&nbsp;Jamie Seymour,&nbsp;Denise L. Doolan,&nbsp;Ryan Orr","doi":"10.1002/edn3.589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.589","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Molecular detection of environmental DNA (eDNA) and RNA (eRNA) allows highly sensitive qualitative (i.e., presence or absence) and quantitative (i.e., abundance) monitoring of aquatic bacteria. However, bacterial molecular diagnostics are limited by low positive predictive values. Protocols for bacterial eDNA and eRNA molecular monitoring have primarily focused on optimizing specimen collection, and the optimal method to purify bacterial nucleic material from postcollection aquatic specimens to maximize the analytical sensitivity of molecular diagnostics remains poorly defined. Accordingly, strategies to isolate bacterial eDNA and eRNA from fresh and saltwater were investigated. We evaluated two filtration and four nucleic acid purification systems as representative of current generation bacterial eDNA and eRNA isolation strategies for capacity to isolate bacterial eDNA and eRNA from prelysed (i.e., free-nucleic acids) and viable (i.e., colony forming units, CFU) bacterial cells. We also compared the sensitivities of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and metagenomic shotgun microbiome sequencing. The optimal protocol used 0.7 μm borosilicate glass filters (Whatman plc) followed by extraction with the RNeasy PowerWater kit (Qiagen). The protocol had a very high analytical sensitivity (10<sup>−3</sup>–10<sup>0</sup> ng and 10<sup>2</sup>–10<sup>1</sup> CFU detected in 500 mL) across multiple species of bacteria, when tested with either RTqPCR or metagenomic sequencing. Importantly, this study highlighted several limitations which are restrictive to both qualitative and quantitative bacterial eDNA and eRNA studies. First, a 12-h time course between sampling and extraction revealed significant species-specific changes in cell number and free-nucleic acid concentrations can occur postspecimen collection. Second, we found Gram-positive bacteria yielded less nucleic material compared to Gram-negative bacteria suggesting bacterial eDNA and eRNA studies could be biased by microorganism genome stability and extraction efficiency. This study highlights the need to define the species-specific diagnostic sensitivity of a protocol when monitoring aquatic bacterial eDNA and eRNA with molecular diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.589","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141631226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection differences between eDNA and mid-water trawls are driven by fish biomass and habitat preferences 鱼类生物量和生境偏好决定了 eDNA 和中层拖网之间的检测差异
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.586
Tessa Rehill, Ben Millard-Martin, Matt Lemay, Kate Sheridan, Anya Mueller, Evan Morien, Rute B. G. Clemente-Carvalho, Brian P. V. Hunt, Jennifer M. Sunday

Marine scientific trawl surveys are commonly used to assess the distribution and population size of fisheries-related species, yet the method is effort-intensive and can be environmentally destructive. Sequencing environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples can reveal the presence of organisms in a community without capturing them; however, we expect the detectability of taxa to differ between eDNA and trawl surveys, and understanding how species traits and population variables contribute to detection differences can help calibrate our expectations from each form of sampling. Here, we coupled eDNA metabarcoding and capture trawl surveys in British Columbia, Canada, to examine species traits that explain recurrent differences in detectability between the two methods, including habitat, body size, and biomass. At the regional scale, 17 of 23 fish species (74%) captured by the trawl were detected by eDNA metabarcoding, and 39 additional species were detected by eDNA sampling only. We found that eDNA metabarcoding disproportionately detected trawl-caught species with greater local biomass (i.e., greater biomass in the adjacent trawl). Fish detected only in eDNA had a greater range of body lengths and a broader range of habitat preferences outside the trawls' target size and sampling areas. Our results suggest that with our level of sampling, eDNA metabarcoding can adequately recapitulate detection of fish communities detected by trawl surveys, but with a bias toward fish of high population biomass and greater inclusion of fish from outside the trawled area.

海洋科学拖网调查通常用于评估渔业相关物种的分布和种群数量,但这种方法耗费大量人力物力,而且可能对环境造成破坏。从水样中测序环境 DNA(eDNA)可以在不捕获生物的情况下揭示群落中生物的存在;然而,我们预计 eDNA 和拖网调查对分类群的可探测性会有所不同,了解物种特征和种群变量是如何导致探测差异的,有助于校准我们对每种取样形式的预期。在此,我们将加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的 eDNA 代谢标码和捕获拖网调查结合起来,研究可解释两种方法之间可探测性经常性差异的物种特征,包括栖息地、体型和生物量。在区域范围内,拖网捕获的 23 种鱼类中有 17 种(74%)通过 eDNA 代谢编码法检测到,另有 39 种仅通过 eDNA 采样法检测到。我们发现,通过 eDNA 代谢标定法检测到的拖网捕获鱼种中,当地生物量较大(即邻近拖网的生物量较大)的鱼种比例过高。仅通过 eDNA 检测到的鱼类在拖网的目标尺寸和取样区域之外有更大的体长范围和更广泛的栖息地偏好。我们的研究结果表明,根据我们的取样水平,eDNA 代谢标码可以充分再现拖网调查所发现的鱼类群落,但会偏向于高种群生物量的鱼类,并更多地包含拖网区域外的鱼类。
{"title":"Detection differences between eDNA and mid-water trawls are driven by fish biomass and habitat preferences","authors":"Tessa Rehill,&nbsp;Ben Millard-Martin,&nbsp;Matt Lemay,&nbsp;Kate Sheridan,&nbsp;Anya Mueller,&nbsp;Evan Morien,&nbsp;Rute B. G. Clemente-Carvalho,&nbsp;Brian P. V. Hunt,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Sunday","doi":"10.1002/edn3.586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.586","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine scientific trawl surveys are commonly used to assess the distribution and population size of fisheries-related species, yet the method is effort-intensive and can be environmentally destructive. Sequencing environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples can reveal the presence of organisms in a community without capturing them; however, we expect the detectability of taxa to differ between eDNA and trawl surveys, and understanding how species traits and population variables contribute to detection differences can help calibrate our expectations from each form of sampling. Here, we coupled eDNA metabarcoding and capture trawl surveys in British Columbia, Canada, to examine species traits that explain recurrent differences in detectability between the two methods, including habitat, body size, and biomass. At the regional scale, 17 of 23 fish species (74%) captured by the trawl were detected by eDNA metabarcoding, and 39 additional species were detected by eDNA sampling only. We found that eDNA metabarcoding disproportionately detected trawl-caught species with greater local biomass (i.e., greater biomass in the adjacent trawl). Fish detected only in eDNA had a greater range of body lengths and a broader range of habitat preferences outside the trawls' target size and sampling areas. Our results suggest that with our level of sampling, eDNA metabarcoding can adequately recapitulate detection of fish communities detected by trawl surveys, but with a bias toward fish of high population biomass and greater inclusion of fish from outside the trawled area.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.586","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141624470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integration of citizen science and eDNA reveals novel ecological insights for marine fish conservation 公民科学与 eDNA 的结合为海洋鱼类保护提供了新的生态见解
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.584
Lone Kvalheim, Eivind Stensrud, Halvor Knutsen, Olli Hyvärinen, Alexander Eiler

In the face of climate change, the accelerating nature crisis, and other anthropogenic impacts, conserving biodiversity demands effective monitoring. While innovative approaches have emerged to enhance biodiversity assessment, significant data gaps persist, particularly within marine ecosystems. In this study, we assess the utility of combining citizen (community) science with environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding for characterizing and quantifying marine fish biodiversity. Over the summer of 2022, 32 volunteers conducted extensive water sampling in a large Norwegian fjord, yielding 96 samples. Contrasting eDNA findings with conventional observational surveys (such as a national species registration database and beach seine surveys) unveiled a substantial overlap in recorded species inventories. The eDNA citizen science initiative identified previously undocumented species and rediscovered others emphasizing an increase in warm-water species within the study area. Additionally, eDNA data unveiled reduced diversity within the inner fjord relative to the outer fjord. To conclude, our study demonstrates the successful integration of eDNA within a citizen science framework, facilitating comprehensive biodiversity tracking across coastal marine regions. These findings hold promise for advancing marine conservation efforts by providing valuable data to inform critical decision-making processes.

面对气候变化、日益加剧的自然危机和其他人为影响,保护生物多样性需要有效的监测。虽然已经出现了创新方法来加强生物多样性评估,但数据缺口仍然很大,尤其是在海洋生态系统中。在这项研究中,我们评估了公民(社区)科学与环境 DNA(eDNA)元条码相结合在描述和量化海洋鱼类生物多样性方面的效用。2022 年夏天,32 名志愿者在挪威的一个大型峡湾进行了广泛的水样采集,共采集了 96 个样本。将 eDNA 发现与传统观察调查(如国家物种登记数据库和海滩围网调查)进行对比,发现记录的物种清单存在大量重叠。eDNA 公民科学行动发现了以前未记录的物种,并重新发现了其他物种,强调了研究区域内暖水物种的增加。此外,eDNA 数据显示,相对于外峡湾,内峡湾的物种多样性有所减少。总之,我们的研究证明了 eDNA 在公民科学框架内的成功整合,促进了对沿海海洋区域生物多样性的全面追踪。这些发现为推进海洋保护工作带来了希望,为关键决策过程提供了宝贵的数据。
{"title":"Integration of citizen science and eDNA reveals novel ecological insights for marine fish conservation","authors":"Lone Kvalheim,&nbsp;Eivind Stensrud,&nbsp;Halvor Knutsen,&nbsp;Olli Hyvärinen,&nbsp;Alexander Eiler","doi":"10.1002/edn3.584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.584","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the face of climate change, the accelerating nature crisis, and other anthropogenic impacts, conserving biodiversity demands effective monitoring. While innovative approaches have emerged to enhance biodiversity assessment, significant data gaps persist, particularly within marine ecosystems. In this study, we assess the utility of combining citizen (community) science with environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding for characterizing and quantifying marine fish biodiversity. Over the summer of 2022, 32 volunteers conducted extensive water sampling in a large Norwegian fjord, yielding 96 samples. Contrasting eDNA findings with conventional observational surveys (such as a national species registration database and beach seine surveys) unveiled a substantial overlap in recorded species inventories. The eDNA citizen science initiative identified previously undocumented species and rediscovered others emphasizing an increase in warm-water species within the study area. Additionally, eDNA data unveiled reduced diversity within the inner fjord relative to the outer fjord. To conclude, our study demonstrates the successful integration of eDNA within a citizen science framework, facilitating comprehensive biodiversity tracking across coastal marine regions. These findings hold promise for advancing marine conservation efforts by providing valuable data to inform critical decision-making processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.584","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141583974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can environmental DNA be used within pest insect agricultural biosecurity? Detecting khapra beetle within stored rice 环境 DNA 能否用于害虫农业生物安全?检测储藏稻米中的甲虫
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.585
Anthony R. Vastano, Michael C. Allen, Cory J. Penca, Oliver C. Stringham, Michael J. Domingue, Julie L. Lockwood

Environmental DNA (eDNA) has recently emerged as an effective tool for invasive species biosecurity. We explored the use of eDNA for the detection of khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium, Everts 1898), an invasive insect of cereal grains and other food products that has a high global economic impact. We developed a novel method for aggregating khapra beetle eDNA deposited in stored grain that entails washing a sample of rice, filtering the sample, and detecting trace beetle DNA using a standard qPCR workflow. To explore the performance of this method, we raised 500 khapra beetle larvae within 500 g of rice over a 14-day period and then removed them. We then used this “spiked” rice to create a range of simulated densities of khapra beetle larvae. This lab approach mimics conditions that are comparable to field densities of ~1.4 to 180 beetles per 50 kg of rice (1/8 to 16 spiked rice grains per 100 g sample of clean rice), assuming DNA is uniformly distributed within the rice. We detected khapra beetle eDNA from all density levels tested. Logistic models revealed that eDNA amounts equivalent to what is left by ~1 khapra beetle larva in a 50 kg container of rice can be detected with 85% to >97% certainty, depending on the number of qPCR technical replicates run per sample. Based on this model, we estimated that for one 50 kg container of rice where beetle DNA is uniformly distributed, a single sample of 100 g with six technical replicates would be sufficient to be >99% certain that the container was free of khapra beetle eDNA (95% credible intervals: 97.7%–100%). Our results suggest that eDNA surveys may be useful as a cost-effective, first-step detection of khapra beetle in stored grain and provide a means to map the relative magnitude of khapra beetle transport pathways, informing allocation of conventional biosecurity inspection efforts.

环境 DNA(eDNA)近来已成为入侵物种生物安全的有效工具。我们探索了利用 eDNA 检测卡普拉甲虫(Trogoderma granarium,Everts 1898)的方法,卡普拉甲虫是一种入侵谷物和其他食品的昆虫,对全球经济影响很大。我们开发了一种新方法来聚集沉积在储藏谷物中的卡布拉甲虫 eDNA,该方法需要清洗大米样品、过滤样品,并使用标准 qPCR 工作流程检测甲虫的痕量 DNA。为了探索这种方法的性能,我们在 500 克大米中饲养了 500 只卡帕甲虫幼虫,为期 14 天,然后将其取出。然后,我们用这种 "加标 "大米创建了一系列卡布拉甲虫幼虫的模拟密度。这种实验室方法模拟的条件与每 50 千克稻米中约 1.4 到 180 只甲虫的田间密度相当(每 100 克干净稻米样品中含 1/8 到 16 个加标米粒),假定 DNA 在稻米中均匀分布。我们在测试的所有密度水平上都检测到了卡帕甲虫的 eDNA。逻辑模型显示,根据每个样品运行的 qPCR 技术重复次数,可以以 85% 到 97% 的确定性检测到相当于 50 千克稻米容器中约 1 只卡布拉甲虫幼虫残留的 eDNA 量。根据这一模型,我们估计,对于甲虫 DNA 分布均匀的 50 千克稻米容器,一个 100 克的样本加上 6 个技术重复,就足以>99%地确定容器中没有甲虫 eDNA(95% 可信区间:97.7%-100%)。我们的研究结果表明,eDNA 调查可作为检测贮藏谷物中卡布拉甲虫的经济有效的第一步,并提供了一种绘制卡布拉甲虫运输途径相对规模图的方法,为常规生物安全检查工作的分配提供信息。
{"title":"Can environmental DNA be used within pest insect agricultural biosecurity? Detecting khapra beetle within stored rice","authors":"Anthony R. Vastano,&nbsp;Michael C. Allen,&nbsp;Cory J. Penca,&nbsp;Oliver C. Stringham,&nbsp;Michael J. Domingue,&nbsp;Julie L. Lockwood","doi":"10.1002/edn3.585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.585","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) has recently emerged as an effective tool for invasive species biosecurity. We explored the use of eDNA for the detection of khapra beetle (<i>Trogoderma granarium</i>, Everts 1898), an invasive insect of cereal grains and other food products that has a high global economic impact. We developed a novel method for aggregating khapra beetle eDNA deposited in stored grain that entails washing a sample of rice, filtering the sample, and detecting trace beetle DNA using a standard qPCR workflow. To explore the performance of this method, we raised 500 khapra beetle larvae within 500 g of rice over a 14-day period and then removed them. We then used this “spiked” rice to create a range of simulated densities of khapra beetle larvae. This lab approach mimics conditions that are comparable to field densities of ~1.4 to 180 beetles per 50 kg of rice (1/8 to 16 spiked rice grains per 100 g sample of clean rice), assuming DNA is uniformly distributed within the rice. We detected khapra beetle eDNA from all density levels tested. Logistic models revealed that eDNA amounts equivalent to what is left by ~1 khapra beetle larva in a 50 kg container of rice can be detected with 85% to &gt;97% certainty, depending on the number of qPCR technical replicates run per sample. Based on this model, we estimated that for one 50 kg container of rice where beetle DNA is uniformly distributed, a single sample of 100 g with six technical replicates would be sufficient to be &gt;99% certain that the container was free of khapra beetle eDNA (95% credible intervals: 97.7%–100%). Our results suggest that eDNA surveys may be useful as a cost-effective, first-step detection of khapra beetle in stored grain and provide a means to map the relative magnitude of khapra beetle transport pathways, informing allocation of conventional biosecurity inspection efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.585","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141583975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A quantitative analysis of vertebrate environmental DNA degradation in soil in response to time, UV light, and temperature 土壤中脊椎动物环境 DNA 降解随时间、紫外线和温度变化的定量分析
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.581
Austin M. Guthrie, Christine E. Cooper, Philip W. Bateman, Mieke van der Heyde, Morten E. Allentoft, Paul Nevill

Environmental DNA (eDNA) degradation influences the effectiveness of eDNA-based biodiversity monitoring, but the factors that determine the rate of decay of eDNA in terrestrial environments are poorly understood. We assessed the persistence of vertebrate eDNA from a mock vertebrate community created with soil from zoo enclosures holding 10 target species from different taxonomic classes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) and of different biomass (little penguin and giraffe). We examined species detection rates resulting from eDNA metabarcoding, as well as relative eDNA concentrations via qPCR, from soil samples over eight time points (0–12 weeks), during exposure to three ambient temperatures (10, 25, and 40°C) and three levels of ultraviolet B (UV-B) radiation (0%, 50%, and 100% intensity). We recorded considerable variation in detectability between species, independent of temperature, and UV-B effects. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated degradation of eDNA over time for all temperature and UV treatments, although it was still possible to detect eDNA from some species after 12 weeks. Degradation rates were lowest for high UV-B treatments, presumably due to UV-B reducing bacterial metabolism. The temperatures investigated did not influence eDNA decay. Our results indicate that eDNA in soil can persist under a range of temperatures and high UV radiation for longer than expected. Sheltered sites with minimal UV-B radiation, which have previously been considered ideal sites for terrestrial eDNA collection, may not be optimal for eDNA persistence in some cases due to microbial decay. A better understanding of eDNA degradation in terrestrial environments is needed to enhance the accuracy of eDNA metabarcoding for surveying terrestrial vertebrate communities.

环境DNA(eDNA)的降解会影响基于eDNA的生物多样性监测的有效性,但人们对决定陆地环境中eDNA降解速度的因素知之甚少。我们评估了一个模拟脊椎动物群落中脊椎动物 eDNA 的持久性,该群落是用动物园围栏中的土壤创建的,围栏中的 10 个目标物种来自不同的分类学类别(爬行动物、鸟类和哺乳动物)和不同的生物量(小企鹅和长颈鹿)。在暴露于三种环境温度(10、25 和 40°C)和三种水平的紫外线 B(UV-B)辐射(0%、50% 和 100% 强度)期间,我们对八个时间点(0-12 周)土壤样本中的 eDNA 代谢编码产生的物种检出率以及通过 qPCR 检测的相对 eDNA 浓度进行了研究。我们发现,不同物种之间的可检测性差异很大,与温度和紫外线 B 的影响无关。定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)表明,随着时间的推移,所有温度和紫外线处理下的 eDNA 都会发生降解,尽管在 12 周后仍能检测到某些物种的 eDNA。高紫外线-B 处理的降解率最低,这可能是由于紫外线-B 减少了细菌的新陈代谢。所研究的温度对 eDNA 的衰变没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,土壤中的 eDNA 在不同温度和高紫外线辐射下的存活时间比预期的要长。以往被认为是采集陆地 eDNA 理想地点的紫外线-B 辐射最小的隐蔽地点,由于微生物的衰变,在某些情况下可能不是 eDNA 持久性的最佳地点。需要更好地了解陆地环境中的 eDNA 降解,以提高用于陆地脊椎动物群落调查的 eDNA 代谢标码的准确性。
{"title":"A quantitative analysis of vertebrate environmental DNA degradation in soil in response to time, UV light, and temperature","authors":"Austin M. Guthrie,&nbsp;Christine E. Cooper,&nbsp;Philip W. Bateman,&nbsp;Mieke van der Heyde,&nbsp;Morten E. Allentoft,&nbsp;Paul Nevill","doi":"10.1002/edn3.581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.581","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) degradation influences the effectiveness of eDNA-based biodiversity monitoring, but the factors that determine the rate of decay of eDNA in terrestrial environments are poorly understood. We assessed the persistence of vertebrate eDNA from a mock vertebrate community created with soil from zoo enclosures holding 10 target species from different taxonomic classes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) and of different biomass (little penguin and giraffe). We examined species detection rates resulting from eDNA metabarcoding, as well as relative eDNA concentrations via qPCR, from soil samples over eight time points (0–12 weeks), during exposure to three ambient temperatures (10, 25, and 40°C) and three levels of ultraviolet B (UV-B) radiation (0%, 50%, and 100% intensity). We recorded considerable variation in detectability between species, independent of temperature, and UV-B effects. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) indicated degradation of eDNA over time for all temperature and UV treatments, although it was still possible to detect eDNA from some species after 12 weeks. Degradation rates were lowest for high UV-B treatments, presumably due to UV-B reducing bacterial metabolism. The temperatures investigated did not influence eDNA decay. Our results indicate that eDNA in soil can persist under a range of temperatures and high UV radiation for longer than expected. Sheltered sites with minimal UV-B radiation, which have previously been considered ideal sites for terrestrial eDNA collection, may not be optimal for eDNA persistence in some cases due to microbial decay. A better understanding of eDNA degradation in terrestrial environments is needed to enhance the accuracy of eDNA metabarcoding for surveying terrestrial vertebrate communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.581","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141536637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Environmental DNA for monitoring the impact of offshore wind farms on fish and invertebrate community structures 用于监测海上风电场对鱼类和无脊椎动物群落结构影响的环境 DNA
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.575
Isolde Cornelis, Annelies De Backer, Sara Maes, Joran Vanhollebeke, Rein Brys, Tom Ruttink, Kris Hostens, Sofie Derycke

To reach the renewable energy targets set by the European Commission, a tenfold expansion of the installed offshore wind farms is needed. Since the construction of offshore wind farms may affect local soft-sediment fauna, an efficient monitoring technique is needed to monitor the potential effects on the marine ecosystem. Here, we assess whether eDNA metabarcoding is a suitable alternative to monitor fish and epibenthos biodiversity in these difficult to access marine habitats. Water sampling and trawl surveys were conducted in parallel in 12 coastal and 18 offshore sites, the latter located inside and outside two offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. 12S eDNA metabarcoding retrieved 85.7% of the fish species caught in the beam trawls, whereas the COI eDNA metabarcoding only identified 31.4% of the epibenthic invertebrate species. Furthermore, the 12S marker resulted in an additional detection of 26 unique fish species, whereas the COI marker detected an additional 90 invertebrate species. Spatial patterns in alpha diversity recovered with eDNA metabarcoding were not significantly different from those observed with morphological determination. Significant differences were found in fish and invertebrate community structures between the coastal, transition and offshore zones as well as on the smaller wind farm scales, which agreed with the morphological beam trawl data. Indicator species found with morphological beam trawl monitoring for each of the three zones (coastal, transition, offshore) were also detected with 12S eDNA metabarcoding, and the latter method detected an additional 31 indicator species. Our findings show the need for adequate quality control of the obtained species lists and reveal that 12S eDNA metabarcoding analyses offers a useful survey tool for the monitoring of fish communities in offshore wind farms, but the used COI assay did not adequately capture the epibenthic communities as observed with beam trawl data.

为了实现欧盟委员会制定的可再生能源目标,需要将已安装的海上风电场扩大十倍。由于海上风电场的建设可能会影响当地的软沉积动物,因此需要一种高效的监测技术来监测其对海洋生态系统的潜在影响。在此,我们评估了 eDNA 代谢编码是否是在这些难以进入的海洋栖息地监测鱼类和底栖生物生物多样性的合适替代方法。我们在 12 个沿海和 18 个近海地点同时进行了水样采集和拖网调查,后者位于北海比利时部分的两个近海风电场内外。12S eDNA 代谢标示法检索到了 85.7% 的束拖网捕获的鱼类物种,而 COI eDNA 代谢标示法仅鉴定出 31.4% 的底栖无脊椎动物物种。此外,12S 标记还额外发现了 26 个独特的鱼类物种,而 COI 标记则额外发现了 90 个无脊椎动物物种。通过 eDNA 代谢编码发现的阿尔法多样性的空间模式与通过形态测定观察到的差异不大。在沿海区、过渡区和近海区以及较小的风电场范围内,鱼类和无脊椎动物群落结构存在明显差异,这与形态束拖网数据一致。通过形态束拖网监测发现的三个区域(沿岸、过渡和近海)的指示物种也能通过 12S eDNA 代谢编码检测到,后一种方法还能检测到另外 31 个指示物种。我们的研究结果表明,需要对所获得的物种清单进行适当的质量控制,并揭示出 12S eDNA 代谢编码分析为监测近海风电场鱼类群落提供了有用的调查工具,但所使用的 COI 检测方法并不能充分捕获束拖网数据所观察到的底栖动物群落。
{"title":"Environmental DNA for monitoring the impact of offshore wind farms on fish and invertebrate community structures","authors":"Isolde Cornelis,&nbsp;Annelies De Backer,&nbsp;Sara Maes,&nbsp;Joran Vanhollebeke,&nbsp;Rein Brys,&nbsp;Tom Ruttink,&nbsp;Kris Hostens,&nbsp;Sofie Derycke","doi":"10.1002/edn3.575","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.575","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To reach the renewable energy targets set by the European Commission, a tenfold expansion of the installed offshore wind farms is needed. Since the construction of offshore wind farms may affect local soft-sediment fauna, an efficient monitoring technique is needed to monitor the potential effects on the marine ecosystem. Here, we assess whether eDNA metabarcoding is a suitable alternative to monitor fish and epibenthos biodiversity in these difficult to access marine habitats. Water sampling and trawl surveys were conducted in parallel in 12 coastal and 18 offshore sites, the latter located inside and outside two offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. 12S eDNA metabarcoding retrieved 85.7% of the fish species caught in the beam trawls, whereas the COI eDNA metabarcoding only identified 31.4% of the epibenthic invertebrate species. Furthermore, the 12S marker resulted in an additional detection of 26 unique fish species, whereas the COI marker detected an additional 90 invertebrate species. Spatial patterns in alpha diversity recovered with eDNA metabarcoding were not significantly different from those observed with morphological determination. Significant differences were found in fish and invertebrate community structures between the coastal, transition and offshore zones as well as on the smaller wind farm scales, which agreed with the morphological beam trawl data. Indicator species found with morphological beam trawl monitoring for each of the three zones (coastal, transition, offshore) were also detected with 12S eDNA metabarcoding, and the latter method detected an additional 31 indicator species. Our findings show the need for adequate quality control of the obtained species lists and reveal that 12S eDNA metabarcoding analyses offers a useful survey tool for the monitoring of fish communities in offshore wind farms, but the used COI assay did not adequately capture the epibenthic communities as observed with beam trawl data.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.575","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141489026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the performance of short 18S rDNA markers for environmental DNA metabarcoding of marine protists 评估短 18S rDNA 标记在海洋原生动物环境 DNA 代谢编码中的性能
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.580
Heike H. Zimmermann, Sara Harðardóttir, Sofia Ribeiro

Marine protists are globally distributed and sensitive to environmental conditions, which makes them a focal group when studying the effects of climate change on biodiversity and ocean health. However, they are a highly diverse group with varying evolutionary histories and morphologies and widely variable preservation potential in the fossil record. Thus, their past diversity and composition are poorly known. Paleogenetics, which relies, among other approaches, on DNA metabarcoding of sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA), provides a promising avenue to explore the past history and responses of marine protists to global change. Choosing the right marker for sedaDNA studies is critical, striking a balance between marker length and taxonomic resolution. While marker guides exist for modern environmental DNA surveys, a thorough assessment of existing short markers for sedaDNA studies targeting protists is lacking. In this study, we report on a comparison of in silico PCR for eight short 18S rDNA markers, including one from the Tara Oceans initiative and a longer marker commonly used in modern marine eDNA studies. We analyze their taxonomic coverage and resolution, taxonomic overlap and uniqueness between markers, co-amplification of non-protist taxa, and amplicon size differences across taxonomic groups. Additionally, we provide a detailed analysis of diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophytes, and chlorophytes. Our study is aimed at supporting project-specific marker choices for characterizing protist composition and diversity. While we focus on marine protists, our results are applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial environments.

海洋原生动物分布于全球各地,对环境条件十分敏感,因此是研究气候变化对生物多样性和海洋健康影响的重点研究对象。然而,海洋原生动物种类繁多,进化历史和形态各异,在化石记录中的保存潜力也千差万别。因此,人们对它们过去的多样性和组成知之甚少。古遗传学主要依靠对沉积古 DNA(sedaDNA)进行 DNA 代谢编码,为探索海洋原生生物的过去历史和对全球变化的反应提供了一条前景广阔的途径。为沉积古 DNA 研究选择合适的标记至关重要,要在标记长度和分类分辨率之间取得平衡。虽然现代环境 DNA 调查已经有了标记指南,但针对原生动物的 sedaDNA 研究还缺乏对现有短标记的全面评估。在本研究中,我们报告了 8 个短 18S rDNA 标记的硅 PCR 比较,包括塔拉海洋计划(Tara Oceans initiative)中的一个标记和现代海洋 eDNA 研究中常用的一个较长标记。我们分析了这些标记的分类覆盖范围和分辨率、标记之间的分类重叠和独特性、非原生分类群的共扩增以及不同分类群之间的扩增子大小差异。此外,我们还对硅藻、甲藻、七彩叶藻和叶绿体进行了详细分析。我们的研究旨在支持特定项目选择标记来描述原生生物的组成和多样性。虽然我们的研究重点是海洋原生动物,但我们的结果也适用于其他水生和陆生环境。
{"title":"Assessing the performance of short 18S rDNA markers for environmental DNA metabarcoding of marine protists","authors":"Heike H. Zimmermann,&nbsp;Sara Harðardóttir,&nbsp;Sofia Ribeiro","doi":"10.1002/edn3.580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.580","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine protists are globally distributed and sensitive to environmental conditions, which makes them a focal group when studying the effects of climate change on biodiversity and ocean health. However, they are a highly diverse group with varying evolutionary histories and morphologies and widely variable preservation potential in the fossil record. Thus, their past diversity and composition are poorly known. Paleogenetics, which relies, among other approaches, on DNA metabarcoding of sedimentary ancient DNA (<i>sed</i>aDNA), provides a promising avenue to explore the past history and responses of marine protists to global change. Choosing the right marker for <i>sed</i>aDNA studies is critical, striking a balance between marker length and taxonomic resolution. While marker guides exist for modern environmental DNA surveys, a thorough assessment of existing short markers for <i>sed</i>aDNA studies targeting protists is lacking. In this study, we report on a comparison of in silico PCR for eight short 18S rDNA markers, including one from the Tara Oceans initiative and a longer marker commonly used in modern marine eDNA studies. We analyze their taxonomic coverage and resolution, taxonomic overlap and uniqueness between markers, co-amplification of non-protist taxa, and amplicon size differences across taxonomic groups. Additionally, we provide a detailed analysis of diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophytes, and chlorophytes. Our study is aimed at supporting project-specific marker choices for characterizing protist composition and diversity. While we focus on marine protists, our results are applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.580","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141489051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing environmental DNA metabarcoding from marine ecosystems: Impact of filter type, storage method, and storage time on the assessment of fish alpha and beta diversity 加强海洋生态系统的环境 DNA 代谢编码:过滤器类型、存储方法和存储时间对鱼类α和β多样性评估的影响
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.570
Manuela R. Bizzozzero, Florian Altermatt, Riccardo Cicciarella, Jean-Claude Walser, Erik P. Willems, Michael Krützen

The collection of environmental DNA (eDNA) and subsequent metabarcoding are useful tools for assessing marine fish biodiversity noninvasively. It is of particular importance to evaluate biodiversity in regions that are hard to access and thus less well studied. Sampling and preservation methods tailored to the specific circumstances are required. Aquatic eDNA is often captured on filters made of different materials and pore sizes, and subsequently stored under divergent conditions for varying periods of time. Previous studies on multispecies detection in marine systems have primarily focused on capture and extraction effects. Our study, in contrast, examined the effects of filter type, storage method, and storage time on DNA yield, alpha (i.e., ZOTU richness) and beta diversity (i.e., ZOTU composition) recovered from a marine ecosystem in Shark Bay, Western Australia. We compared two different filter types (cellulose-nitrate filters with pore sizes of 0.45 μm; glass-fiber filters with pore sizes of 0.1 μm), two storage methods (preservation in Longmire's solution and drying, respectively), various storage times (30–68 days) on two metabarcoding assays using different fish-specific primers. Our results showed that storage time decreased DNA yield and affected alpha and beta diversity estimates. Cellulose-nitrate filters stored in Longmire's solution proved to be the best combination with the smallest decrease in DNA yield, no effect on alpha diversity and consistent community compositions. Storing glass-fiber filters in Longmire's solution led to a decrease in eDNA yield and alpha diversity estimates with increasing storage time. Furthermore, the largest change in beta diversity for each metabarcode was found for glass-fiber filters regardless of storage method. Our results highlight the importance of considering storage time and interactions between storage method and filter when analyzing eDNA results, especially when storing samples for an extended time period or comparison of samples stored for different durations.

收集环境 DNA(eDNA)和随后的代谢编码是评估海洋鱼类生物多样性的有用工具。这对于评估难以进入因而研究较少的地区的生物多样性尤为重要。需要根据具体情况制定采样和保存方法。水生 eDNA 通常通过不同材料和孔径的过滤器采集,然后在不同条件下保存不同时间。以往有关海洋系统中多物种检测的研究主要集中在捕获和提取效果上。与此相反,我们的研究考察了过滤器类型、储存方法和储存时间对从西澳大利亚鲨鱼湾海洋生态系统中回收的DNA产量、α(即ZOTU丰富度)和β多样性(即ZOTU组成)的影响。我们比较了两种不同类型的过滤器(孔径为 0.45 μm 的硝酸纤维素过滤器;孔径为 0.1 μm 的玻璃纤维过滤器)、两种储存方法(分别在 Longmire's 溶液中保存和干燥)、不同的储存时间(30-68 天)以及使用不同鱼类特异性引物的两种元条码检测方法。结果表明,储存时间会降低 DNA 产量,并影响α和β多样性估计值。事实证明,硝酸纤维素过滤器在 Longmire's 溶液中的储存时间是最佳组合,其 DNA 产量下降幅度最小,对α多样性没有影响,群落组成也保持一致。将玻璃纤维过滤器储存在 Longmire 溶液中会导致 eDNA 产量和α多样性估计值随着储存时间的延长而降低。此外,无论采用哪种储存方法,玻璃纤维过滤器中每个代谢条码的贝塔多样性变化最大。我们的研究结果强调了在分析 eDNA 结果时考虑储存时间以及储存方法和过滤器之间相互作用的重要性,尤其是在长时间储存样本或比较不同储存时间的样本时。
{"title":"Enhancing environmental DNA metabarcoding from marine ecosystems: Impact of filter type, storage method, and storage time on the assessment of fish alpha and beta diversity","authors":"Manuela R. Bizzozzero,&nbsp;Florian Altermatt,&nbsp;Riccardo Cicciarella,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Walser,&nbsp;Erik P. Willems,&nbsp;Michael Krützen","doi":"10.1002/edn3.570","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.570","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The collection of environmental DNA (eDNA) and subsequent metabarcoding are useful tools for assessing marine fish biodiversity noninvasively. It is of particular importance to evaluate biodiversity in regions that are hard to access and thus less well studied. Sampling and preservation methods tailored to the specific circumstances are required. Aquatic eDNA is often captured on filters made of different materials and pore sizes, and subsequently stored under divergent conditions for varying periods of time. Previous studies on multispecies detection in marine systems have primarily focused on capture and extraction effects. Our study, in contrast, examined the effects of filter type, storage method, and storage time on DNA yield, alpha (i.e., ZOTU richness) and beta diversity (i.e., ZOTU composition) recovered from a marine ecosystem in Shark Bay, Western Australia. We compared two different filter types (cellulose-nitrate filters with pore sizes of 0.45 μm; glass-fiber filters with pore sizes of 0.1 μm), two storage methods (preservation in Longmire's solution and drying, respectively), various storage times (30–68 days) on two metabarcoding assays using different fish-specific primers. Our results showed that storage time decreased DNA yield and affected alpha and beta diversity estimates. Cellulose-nitrate filters stored in Longmire's solution proved to be the best combination with the smallest decrease in DNA yield, no effect on alpha diversity and consistent community compositions. Storing glass-fiber filters in Longmire's solution led to a decrease in eDNA yield and alpha diversity estimates with increasing storage time. Furthermore, the largest change in beta diversity for each metabarcode was found for glass-fiber filters regardless of storage method. Our results highlight the importance of considering storage time and interactions between storage method and filter when analyzing eDNA results, especially when storing samples for an extended time period or comparison of samples stored for different durations.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.570","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141488390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Community structure and functional diversity of aquatic fungi are correlated with water quality: Insights from multi-marker analysis of environmental DNA in a coastal watershed 水生真菌的群落结构和功能多样性与水质相关:沿海流域环境 DNA 多标记分析的启示
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.576
Lauren Cortez French, Michelle A. Jusino, Randolph M. Chambers, James Skelton

Aquatic fungi drive important ecosystem processes, which may be affected by anthropogenic stressors, including changes in water quality. However, due to the great diversity of aquatic fungi, our understanding of the relationships among water quality variables, fungal community composition, and ecosystem function remains incomplete. Here, we show that aquatic fungal community structure and functional diversity correlate strongly with water quality. We used a multi-marker survey of environmental DNA and long-term water quality data to survey 17 stream, pond, and tidal creek sites within a coastal drainage network in southeastern Virginia, USA, targeting both the ITS2 and LSU barcoding regions. The community composition of Chytridiomycota and Ascomycota (fungal phyla) and aquatic hyphomycetes (a functional group) were strongly correlated with habitat type and water quality variables. Functional diversity of aquatic fungi decreased with warmer water, due mainly to the reduced richness of saprotrophic groups, and increased with total particulate phosphorus, due to the richness of algal parasites. Community dissimilarity analyses of samples using both ITS2 and LSU yielded consistent results, but per-sample alpha diversity differed. This work reveals a surprising degree of local variation in aquatic fungal community composition and functional diversity within a coastal watershed, which was coupled with variation in water quality variables. Furthermore, eDNA sampling is an effective and efficient means to accurately characterize diverse aquatic fungal communities with exciting implications for addressing basic and applied research questions. Our work supports the prediction that community composition and functional diversity of aquatic fungi are impacted by impaired water quality and global change.

水生真菌驱动着重要的生态系统过程,而这些过程可能会受到人为压力因素(包括水质变化)的影响。然而,由于水生真菌种类繁多,我们对水质变量、真菌群落组成和生态系统功能之间关系的了解仍不全面。在这里,我们发现水生真菌群落结构和功能多样性与水质密切相关。我们利用环境 DNA 多标记调查和长期水质数据,调查了美国弗吉尼亚州东南部沿海排水网络中的 17 个溪流、池塘和潮汐小河地点,目标是 ITS2 和 LSU 条形码区域。鞘霉菌群和子囊菌群(真菌门)以及水生真菌(功能群)的群落组成与栖息地类型和水质变量密切相关。水生真菌的功能多样性随着水温的升高而降低,这主要是由于嗜食性真菌群的丰富度降低;随着总颗粒磷的升高而增加,这主要是由于藻类寄生虫的丰富度增加。使用 ITS2 和 LSU 对样本进行群落异质性分析的结果是一致的,但每个样本的阿尔法多样性有所不同。这项研究揭示了一个沿海流域内水生真菌群落组成和功能多样性的局部差异程度令人惊讶,这种差异还与水质变量的变化有关。此外,eDNA 采样是准确描述多样化水生真菌群落特征的有效手段,对解决基础和应用研究问题具有令人兴奋的意义。我们的工作支持了水生真菌群落组成和功能多样性受水质受损和全球变化影响的预测。
{"title":"Community structure and functional diversity of aquatic fungi are correlated with water quality: Insights from multi-marker analysis of environmental DNA in a coastal watershed","authors":"Lauren Cortez French,&nbsp;Michelle A. Jusino,&nbsp;Randolph M. Chambers,&nbsp;James Skelton","doi":"10.1002/edn3.576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.576","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquatic fungi drive important ecosystem processes, which may be affected by anthropogenic stressors, including changes in water quality. However, due to the great diversity of aquatic fungi, our understanding of the relationships among water quality variables, fungal community composition, and ecosystem function remains incomplete. Here, we show that aquatic fungal community structure and functional diversity correlate strongly with water quality. We used a multi-marker survey of environmental DNA and long-term water quality data to survey 17 stream, pond, and tidal creek sites within a coastal drainage network in southeastern Virginia, USA, targeting both the ITS2 and LSU barcoding regions. The community composition of Chytridiomycota and Ascomycota (fungal phyla) and aquatic hyphomycetes (a functional group) were strongly correlated with habitat type and water quality variables. Functional diversity of aquatic fungi decreased with warmer water, due mainly to the reduced richness of saprotrophic groups, and increased with total particulate phosphorus, due to the richness of algal parasites. Community dissimilarity analyses of samples using both ITS2 and LSU yielded consistent results, but per-sample alpha diversity differed. This work reveals a surprising degree of local variation in aquatic fungal community composition and functional diversity within a coastal watershed, which was coupled with variation in water quality variables. Furthermore, eDNA sampling is an effective and efficient means to accurately characterize diverse aquatic fungal communities with exciting implications for addressing basic and applied research questions. Our work supports the prediction that community composition and functional diversity of aquatic fungi are impacted by impaired water quality and global change.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.576","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141441344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Glimpse of past dynamics: A new set of phytoplankton primers for sedaDNA 过去动态一瞥:一套新的浮游植物 sedaDNA 引物
Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.577
Juliane Romahn, Damian Baranski, Alexandra Schmidt, Jérôme Kaiser, Helge Arz, Laura S. Epp, Anke Kremp, Miklós Bálint

Sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) offers an important opportunity for investigating long-term community dynamics. Nevertheless, sedaDNA is challenging since DNA is degraded and fragmented over time. Of particular interest for such sedaDNA studies are phytoplankton communities, which are sensitive environmental indicators and important producers in aquatic systems. So far, only a few suitable metabarcoding primers for sedaDNA targeting phytoplankton exist. In this study, we introduce new metabarcoding primers targeting cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. They amplify short, ~200-bp ribosomal 16S and 18S DNA fragments. We compared these primers against published ones, uncovering distinct communities captured by different primer sets. The newly designed dinoflagellate and cyanobacterial primers revealed unique sets of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) compared to published primers, highlighting the impact of primer choice on describing community composition. We also explored the effect of amplicon length on metabarcoding success over a sample age. Observed trends suggest that amplification success decreases with longer amplicons, probably as a result of DNA degradation in older sediment samples. Lastly, strong DNA preservation challenges emerged in sediment samples older than 7000 BP, corresponding with oxic phases of the Baltic Sea bottom water. This emphasizes the importance of age, sediment type, and preservation conditions when interpreting sedaDNA results. Despite limitations in temporal resolution, the study shows that sedaDNA-based fluctuations in the phytoplankton community are consistent with well-known environmental stages. More research is necessary to understand (1) DNA preservation and its impact on reconstructed communities and (2) impact of abiotic conditions on phytoplankton communities.

沉积古 DNA(sedaDNA)为研究长期群落动态提供了重要机会。然而,由于 DNA 会随着时间的推移而降解和破碎,因此沉积古 DNA 的研究具有挑战性。浮游植物群落是此类 sedaDNA 研究的重点,它们是敏感的环境指标,也是水生系统中的重要生产者。迄今为止,只有少数合适的针对浮游植物的沉积 DNA 代谢标引物。在本研究中,我们引入了针对蓝藻和甲藻的新型元标码引物。这些引物可扩增约 200-bp 的短核糖体 16S 和 18S DNA 片段。我们将这些引物与已发表的引物进行了比较,发现了不同引物组所捕获的不同群落。与已发表的引物相比,新设计的甲藻和蓝藻引物揭示了独特的扩增子序列变异(ASV)集,突出了引物选择对描述群落组成的影响。我们还探讨了扩增子长度对样本年代代谢标码成功率的影响。观察到的趋势表明,扩增成功率随扩增子长度的增加而降低,这可能是由于较老沉积物样本中 DNA 降解的结果。最后,在公元前 7000 年以前的沉积物样本中,DNA 的保存面临巨大挑战,这与波罗的海底层水的缺氧阶段相对应。这强调了在解释沉积 DNA 结果时年龄、沉积物类型和保存条件的重要性。尽管在时间分辨率方面存在局限性,但该研究表明,基于沉积 DNA 的浮游植物群落波动与众所周知的环境阶段是一致的。有必要开展更多研究,以了解:(1)DNA 的保存及其对重建群落的影响;(2)非生物条件对浮游植物群落的影响。
{"title":"Glimpse of past dynamics: A new set of phytoplankton primers for sedaDNA","authors":"Juliane Romahn,&nbsp;Damian Baranski,&nbsp;Alexandra Schmidt,&nbsp;Jérôme Kaiser,&nbsp;Helge Arz,&nbsp;Laura S. Epp,&nbsp;Anke Kremp,&nbsp;Miklós Bálint","doi":"10.1002/edn3.577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.577","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) offers an important opportunity for investigating long-term community dynamics. Nevertheless, sedaDNA is challenging since DNA is degraded and fragmented over time. Of particular interest for such sedaDNA studies are phytoplankton communities, which are sensitive environmental indicators and important producers in aquatic systems. So far, only a few suitable metabarcoding primers for sedaDNA targeting phytoplankton exist. In this study, we introduce new metabarcoding primers targeting cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. They amplify short, ~200-bp ribosomal 16S and 18S DNA fragments. We compared these primers against published ones, uncovering distinct communities captured by different primer sets. The newly designed dinoflagellate and cyanobacterial primers revealed unique sets of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) compared to published primers, highlighting the impact of primer choice on describing community composition. We also explored the effect of amplicon length on metabarcoding success over a sample age. Observed trends suggest that amplification success decreases with longer amplicons, probably as a result of DNA degradation in older sediment samples. Lastly, strong DNA preservation challenges emerged in sediment samples older than 7000 BP, corresponding with oxic phases of the Baltic Sea bottom water. This emphasizes the importance of age, sediment type, and preservation conditions when interpreting sedaDNA results. Despite limitations in temporal resolution, the study shows that sedaDNA-based fluctuations in the phytoplankton community are consistent with well-known environmental stages. More research is necessary to understand (1) DNA preservation and its impact on reconstructed communities and (2) impact of abiotic conditions on phytoplankton communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.577","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141439681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Environmental DNA
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1