Jiří Novák, Sebastian Cristian Treitli, Zoltán Füssy, Kristína Záhonová, Blanka Hamplová, Štěpánka Hrdá, Vladimír Hampl
Short amplicon sequencing is a commonly used method to study the diversity of organisms in various habitats. The hypervariable regions of the small subunit rRNA gene (18S rDNA) are the most general barcodes for eukaryotes, which can provide detailed taxonomic information across a wide range of eukaryotic diversity. However, some organisms are often missed by universal primers, which have difficulty amplifying their barcodes. In this study, specific primers were designed for the amplification of the highly diverse 18S-V9 region of the Euglenozoa and Metamonada groups. The performance of the newly designed primers—V9Eug and V9Meta—was compared with the universal V9 primer on cultured communities derived from a range of freshwater environments of the Soos Natural Reserve and the Slavkov Forest in the Czech Republic. The V9Eug primer was more specific with Euglenozoa representing 91.8% of reads and 57.0% of OTUs, while the V9Meta primer showed lower specificity with only 48.4% of reads and 19.7% of OTUs assigned to Metamonada. Both the Euglenozoa and Metamonada primer pairs significantly improved recovery of their target groups compared to the universal V9 primer pair, detecting 2.7 and 1.8 times more OTUs, respectively. These results provide a more sensitive protocol for studying the diversity of these eukaryotic taxa.
{"title":"V9 Hypervariable Region Metabarcoding Primers for Euglenozoa and Metamonada","authors":"Jiří Novák, Sebastian Cristian Treitli, Zoltán Füssy, Kristína Záhonová, Blanka Hamplová, Štěpánka Hrdá, Vladimír Hampl","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Short amplicon sequencing is a commonly used method to study the diversity of organisms in various habitats. The hypervariable regions of the small subunit rRNA gene (18S rDNA) are the most general barcodes for eukaryotes, which can provide detailed taxonomic information across a wide range of eukaryotic diversity. However, some organisms are often missed by universal primers, which have difficulty amplifying their barcodes. In this study, specific primers were designed for the amplification of the highly diverse 18S-V9 region of the Euglenozoa and Metamonada groups. The performance of the newly designed primers—V9Eug and V9Meta—was compared with the universal V9 primer on cultured communities derived from a range of freshwater environments of the Soos Natural Reserve and the Slavkov Forest in the Czech Republic. The V9Eug primer was more specific with Euglenozoa representing 91.8% of reads and 57.0% of OTUs, while the V9Meta primer showed lower specificity with only 48.4% of reads and 19.7% of OTUs assigned to Metamonada. Both the Euglenozoa and Metamonada primer pairs significantly improved recovery of their target groups compared to the universal V9 primer pair, detecting 2.7 and 1.8 times more OTUs, respectively. These results provide a more sensitive protocol for studying the diversity of these eukaryotic taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70022","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling from rivers has emerged as a promising new method for monitoring freshwater organisms of management concern. However, eDNA sampling cannot yet offer reliable estimates of a target species' abundance/biomass or confident determinations of a species' absence from a river segment. To unlock these abilities—and thereby greatly improve eDNA as a tool for management decision-making—the influence of local environmental factors on eDNA fate must be better understood. At nine river sites across the central California coast, we added a known quantity of novel eDNA (Brook Trout, Salvelinus fontinalis) and collected eDNA at sequential downstream distances for qPCR analysis. We then used random forest modeling to identify the most important environmental factors to reach-scale (≤ 200 m) sampling outcomes and characterize salmonid eDNA fate. Our final model identified six factors important to sampling outcomes, including five environmental factors (discharge, local catchment calcium oxide content, average depth of the sampling cross-section, presence of pools, and impervious cover of the watershed) and one factor regarding our experimental design (the number of qPCR technical replicates). Our results highlight the notable effects of cross-sectional area, turbulence, and catchment geology on eDNA fate, and we suggest the discharge and presence of pools as useful proxies for evaluating a site's favorability for eDNA recovery.
{"title":"Identifying Key Environmental Drivers of Reach-Scale Salmonid eDNA Recovery With Random Forest","authors":"Shawn A. Melendy, John R. Olson","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling from rivers has emerged as a promising new method for monitoring freshwater organisms of management concern. However, eDNA sampling cannot yet offer reliable estimates of a target species' abundance/biomass or confident determinations of a species' absence from a river segment. To unlock these abilities—and thereby greatly improve eDNA as a tool for management decision-making—the influence of local environmental factors on eDNA fate must be better understood. At nine river sites across the central California coast, we added a known quantity of novel eDNA (Brook Trout, <i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) and collected eDNA at sequential downstream distances for qPCR analysis. We then used random forest modeling to identify the most important environmental factors to reach-scale (≤ 200 m) sampling outcomes and characterize salmonid eDNA fate. Our final model identified six factors important to sampling outcomes, including five environmental factors (discharge, local catchment calcium oxide content, average depth of the sampling cross-section, presence of pools, and impervious cover of the watershed) and one factor regarding our experimental design (the number of qPCR technical replicates). Our results highlight the notable effects of cross-sectional area, turbulence, and catchment geology on eDNA fate, and we suggest the discharge and presence of pools as useful proxies for evaluating a site's favorability for eDNA recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher McFarland, Emer McCann, Peter McCann, Eric R. Morgan, Nikki J. Marks, Paul McVeigh, Geoffrey N. Gobert
Parasite transmission occurs in complex environments comprising multiple matrices. Trematode parasites of ruminant livestock such as the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica and the rumen fluke, Calicophoron daubneyi, show affinity with freshwater environments shared with their amphibious snail intermediate host, Galba truncatula. Isolation of environmental DNA (eDNA) from these parasites and their snail hosts in water draining from grazing land provides opportunities for improved molecular diagnostic detection and can help identify infection risks at farm level. The detection and quantification of eDNA from other environmental matrices has received less attention but would improve the understanding of parasite dynamics on pasture. Our study has considerably extended eDNA sampling methods for the detection of parasitic trematodes of ruminant livestock and their snail intermediate host by including for the first time the analysis of soil and herbage environmental samples alongside water collections. A droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) workflow was developed to detect parasite and snail eDNA from soil, herbage, and water collected from livestock farms. For the first time, C. daubneyi eDNA was isolated from agricultural soil alongside water samples and G. truncatula eDNA was detected in water, soil, and herbage samples. No environmental samples were positive for F. hepatica eDNA. Assessing multiple environmental matrices increased the number of positive sites. Future implementation of eDNA detection methods alongside traditional parasite diagnostics can underpin more holistic evaluations of the environmental components of parasite epidemiology and facilitate adaptation to changing disease patterns.
寄生虫的传播发生在由多种基质组成的复杂环境中。反刍家畜的吸虫,如肝吸虫(Fasciola hepatica)和瘤胃吸虫(Calicophoron daubneyi),显示出与其两栖蜗牛中间宿主Galba truncatula共享的淡水环境的亲和性。从牧场排水中的这些寄生虫及其蜗牛宿主分离环境 DNA(eDNA)为改进分子诊断检测提供了机会,有助于确定农场一级的感染风险。从其他环境基质中检测和量化 eDNA 的工作较少受到关注,但这将增进对牧场寄生虫动态的了解。我们的研究大大扩展了检测反刍家畜及其蜗牛中间宿主寄生性吸虫的 eDNA 采样方法,首次将土壤和草料环境样本与水采集样本一起纳入分析范围。我们开发了一种液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)工作流程,用于检测从畜牧场采集的土壤、草料和水中的寄生虫和蜗牛 eDNA。首次从农业土壤和水样中分离出 C. daubneyi eDNA,并在水、土壤和草料样本中检测到 G. truncatula eDNA。没有环境样本对 F. hepatica eDNA 呈阳性反应。评估多种环境基质增加了阳性点的数量。未来在使用传统寄生虫诊断方法的同时使用 eDNA 检测方法,可以对寄生虫流行病学的环境因素进行更全面的评估,并促进适应不断变化的疾病模式。
{"title":"Multi-Environment Quantification of Parasite and Intermediate Host DNA on Pasture for Fine-Scale Disease Risk Assessment","authors":"Christopher McFarland, Emer McCann, Peter McCann, Eric R. Morgan, Nikki J. Marks, Paul McVeigh, Geoffrey N. Gobert","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parasite transmission occurs in complex environments comprising multiple matrices. Trematode parasites of ruminant livestock such as the liver fluke, <i>Fasciola hepatica</i> and the rumen fluke, <i>Calicophoron daubneyi</i>, show affinity with freshwater environments shared with their amphibious snail intermediate host, <i>Galba truncatula</i>. Isolation of environmental DNA (eDNA) from these parasites and their snail hosts in water draining from grazing land provides opportunities for improved molecular diagnostic detection and can help identify infection risks at farm level. The detection and quantification of eDNA from other environmental matrices has received less attention but would improve the understanding of parasite dynamics on pasture. Our study has considerably extended eDNA sampling methods for the detection of parasitic trematodes of ruminant livestock and their snail intermediate host by including for the first time the analysis of soil and herbage environmental samples alongside water collections. A droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) workflow was developed to detect parasite and snail eDNA from soil, herbage, and water collected from livestock farms. For the first time, <i>C</i>. <i>daubneyi</i> eDNA was isolated from agricultural soil alongside water samples and <i>G</i>. <i>truncatula</i> eDNA was detected in water, soil, and herbage samples. No environmental samples were positive for <i>F</i>. <i>hepatica</i> eDNA. Assessing multiple environmental matrices increased the number of positive sites. Future implementation of eDNA detection methods alongside traditional parasite diagnostics can underpin more holistic evaluations of the environmental components of parasite epidemiology and facilitate adaptation to changing disease patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142429920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lara Schmittmann, Sophie V. Schindler, Till Bayer, Janina Fuss, Charlotte Havermans, Véronique Merten, Henk-Jan T. Hoving
Many benthic deep-sea animals rely on carcasses from the overlying water column that sink to the seafloor and form local organic enrichments known as food falls. This flux of organic carbon from the shallow pelagic to the deep sea is part of the biological carbon pump (BCP) and as such contributes to carbon sequestration. For a complete understanding of local carbon budgets, it is crucial to identify the diversity and distribution of sinking carcasses which are difficult to detect by observational methods. Here, we analyzed the diet of the abundant amphipod scavenger, Eurythenes gryllus, by DNA metabarcoding to assess their potential to identify food falls in the Fram Strait, a gateway to the Arctic. E. gryllus scavenges on nekton but so far it was not certain whether this represents their main diet. We detected dietary taxa (26 in total) in 20 out of 101 analyzed amphipods. We found that amphipods primarily fed on larger nekton including fish, cephalopods, and mammals, with bony fish being the most targeted food source in terms of diversity and abundance. Only one amphipod had fed on a gelatinous organism. These results support the hypothesis that E. gryllus targets mostly nekton food falls. The diversity of dietary taxa differed between the Eastern and Western Fram Strait, which suggests regional variability in food falls availability. We also detected, for the first time in E. gryllus, infections with the parasitic dinoflagellate Hematodinium. This detection demonstrates the potential of metabarcoding for revealing both food web dynamics and host–parasite interactions in the deep sea. E. gryllus seems a promising “natural sampler” to monitor the diversity of deep-sea food falls which will help to investigate the importance of medium-sized food falls in local vertical carbon export in a rapidly changing Arctic Ocean.
许多深海底栖动物依靠上覆水体中的尸体沉入海底,形成当地的有机富集物,即食物瀑布。这种从浅海水层到深海的有机碳通量是生物碳泵(BCP)的一部分,因此有助于碳固存。要全面了解当地的碳预算,关键是要确定下沉尸体的多样性和分布情况,而观察方法很难检测到这些尸体。在这里,我们通过 DNA 代谢编码分析了丰富的片脚类清道夫 Eurythenes gryllus 的食谱,以评估其识别北极门户弗拉姆海峡食物沉降的潜力。E. gryllus主要捕食泥鳅,但到目前为止还不能确定这是否是它们的主要食物。我们在分析的 101 种片脚类动物中的 20 种(共 26 种)中检测到了食性分类群。我们发现,片脚类动物主要以鱼类、头足类动物和哺乳动物等大型近岸动物为食,从食物的多样性和丰度来看,有骨鱼类是片脚类动物最主要的食物来源。只有一种片脚类动物以胶状生物为食。这些结果支持了蝼蛄主要以软体动物为食物目标的假设。食物分类群的多样性在弗拉姆海峡东部和西部有所不同,这表明食物瀑布的可用性存在区域差异。我们还首次在 E. gryllus 中检测到寄生甲藻 Hematodinium 的感染。这一发现证明了代谢编码在揭示深海食物网动态和宿主与寄生虫相互作用方面的潜力。蝼蛄似乎是一个很有前途的 "天然采样器",可用于监测深海食物瀑布的多样性,这将有助于研究中型食物瀑布在瞬息万变的北冰洋当地垂直碳输出中的重要性。
{"title":"The Sinking Dead—Arctic Deep-Sea Scavengers' Diet Suggests Nekton as Vector in Benthopelagic Coupling","authors":"Lara Schmittmann, Sophie V. Schindler, Till Bayer, Janina Fuss, Charlotte Havermans, Véronique Merten, Henk-Jan T. Hoving","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many benthic deep-sea animals rely on carcasses from the overlying water column that sink to the seafloor and form local organic enrichments known as food falls. This flux of organic carbon from the shallow pelagic to the deep sea is part of the biological carbon pump (BCP) and as such contributes to carbon sequestration. For a complete understanding of local carbon budgets, it is crucial to identify the diversity and distribution of sinking carcasses which are difficult to detect by observational methods. Here, we analyzed the diet of the abundant amphipod scavenger, <i>Eurythenes gryllus</i>, by DNA metabarcoding to assess their potential to identify food falls in the Fram Strait, a gateway to the Arctic. <i>E. gryllus</i> scavenges on nekton but so far it was not certain whether this represents their main diet. We detected dietary taxa (26 in total) in 20 out of 101 analyzed amphipods. We found that amphipods primarily fed on larger nekton including fish, cephalopods, and mammals, with bony fish being the most targeted food source in terms of diversity and abundance. Only one amphipod had fed on a gelatinous organism. These results support the hypothesis that <i>E. gryllus</i> targets mostly nekton food falls. The diversity of dietary taxa differed between the Eastern and Western Fram Strait, which suggests regional variability in food falls availability. We also detected, for the first time in <i>E. gryllus</i>, infections with the parasitic dinoflagellate <i>Hematodinium</i>. This detection demonstrates the potential of metabarcoding for revealing both food web dynamics and host–parasite interactions in the deep sea. <i>E. gryllus</i> seems a promising “natural sampler” to monitor the diversity of deep-sea food falls which will help to investigate the importance of medium-sized food falls in local vertical carbon export in a rapidly changing Arctic Ocean.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan Lee-Rodriguez, Christopher M. Ranger, Ashley Leach, Andrew Michel, Michael E. Reding, Luis Canas
Environmental DNA (eDNA) consists of genetic material shed by living organisms, including those that are deceased, offering a unique opportunity to detect and identify terrestrial insect pests without requiring visual identification. The sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii, and the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, are notorious for causing crop losses through virus transmission and direct feeding. Our study aimed to: (1) assess the effectiveness of B. argentifolii literature-based PCR primers compared to newly developed primers for eDNA amplification, (2) evaluate the sensitivity of conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting eDNA of B. argentifolii and T. urticae, (3) establish a rapid eDNA processing methodology using the LGC Biosearch Technologies QuickExtract DNA extraction kit and the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit, and (4) test the specificity of the developed primers against non-target species. B. argentifolii and T. urticae were confined to tomato leaves (Solanum lycopersicum) using clip cages for 24 h, after which eDNA was collected from leaf surfaces using a water spray method, filtered, and processed for DNA amplification. While literature-based primers showed sufficient sensitivity, their specificity for eDNA applications was inadequate, prompting the design of novel PCR primers for both pest species. Positive eDNA detection was achieved with both amplification methods, with qPCR proving more reliable than cPCR due to the latter's inconsistent performance with positive control samples. We also introduced a rapid eDNA processing approach using the QuickExtract DNA extraction kit, contrasting it with the more conventional Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit. We believe that our findings are the first step toward the practical use of eDNA as a highly sensitive, early detection technique.
环境 DNA(eDNA)由生物体(包括已死亡的生物体)脱落的遗传物质组成,为检测和识别陆生害虫提供了一个独特的机会,而无需肉眼识别。甘薯粉虱(Bemisia argentifolii)和双斑蜘蛛螨(Tetranychus urticae)因传播病毒和直接取食造成作物损失而臭名昭著。我们的研究旨在(1) 与新开发的引物相比,评估基于文献的 B. argentifolii PCR 引物对 eDNA 扩增的有效性;(2) 评估传统 PCR(cPCR)和实时定量 PCR(qPCR)检测 B. argentifolii 和 T. argentifolii eDNA 的灵敏度。 (3) 使用 LGC Biosearch Technologies QuickExtract DNA 提取试剂盒和 Qiagen DNeasy 血液与组织试剂盒建立快速 eDNA 处理方法,以及 (4) 测试开发的引物对非目标物种的特异性。使用夹子笼将 B. argentifolii 和 T. urticae 限制在番茄叶片(Solanum lycopersicum)上 24 小时,然后用水喷雾法从叶片表面收集 eDNA,过滤后进行 DNA 扩增处理。虽然基于文献的引物显示出足够的灵敏度,但它们对 eDNA 应用的特异性不足,这促使我们设计出针对这两种害虫的新型 PCR 引物。两种扩增方法都能检测到阳性 eDNA,qPCR 比 cPCR 更可靠,因为后者在阳性对照样本中的表现不一致。我们还介绍了使用 QuickExtract DNA 提取试剂盒快速处理 eDNA 的方法,并将其与更传统的 Qiagen DNeasy 血液和组织试剂盒进行了对比。我们相信,我们的研究结果是将 eDNA 作为一种高灵敏度早期检测技术投入实际应用的第一步。
{"title":"Using Environmental DNA to Detect and Identify Sweetpotato Whitefly Bemisia argentifolii and Twospotted Spider Mite Tetranychus urticae in Greenhouse-Grown Tomato Plants","authors":"Jonathan Lee-Rodriguez, Christopher M. Ranger, Ashley Leach, Andrew Michel, Michael E. Reding, Luis Canas","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70026","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) consists of genetic material shed by living organisms, including those that are deceased, offering a unique opportunity to detect and identify terrestrial insect pests without requiring visual identification. The sweetpotato whitefly, <i>Bemisia argentifolii</i>, and the twospotted spider mite, <i>Tetranychus urticae</i>, are notorious for causing crop losses through virus transmission and direct feeding. Our study aimed to: (1) assess the effectiveness of <i>B. argentifolii</i> literature-based PCR primers compared to newly developed primers for eDNA amplification, (2) evaluate the sensitivity of conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting eDNA of <i>B. argentifolii</i> and <i>T. urticae</i>, (3) establish a rapid eDNA processing methodology using the LGC Biosearch Technologies QuickExtract DNA extraction kit and the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit, and (4) test the specificity of the developed primers against non-target species. <i>B. argentifolii</i> and <i>T. urticae</i> were confined to tomato leaves (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>) using clip cages for 24 h, after which eDNA was collected from leaf surfaces using a water spray method, filtered, and processed for DNA amplification. While literature-based primers showed sufficient sensitivity, their specificity for eDNA applications was inadequate, prompting the design of novel PCR primers for both pest species. Positive eDNA detection was achieved with both amplification methods, with qPCR proving more reliable than cPCR due to the latter's inconsistent performance with positive control samples. We also introduced a rapid eDNA processing approach using the QuickExtract DNA extraction kit, contrasting it with the more conventional Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit. We believe that our findings are the first step toward the practical use of eDNA as a highly sensitive, early detection technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Josh Smith, Bruno David, Andy Hicks, Shaun Wilkinson, Nicolas Ling, Daniel Fake, Alastair Suren, Amy Gault
National standardization of ecological sampling protocols between different agencies in Aotearoa New Zealand has historically been difficult to attain, creating challenges for combining datasets for national scale analyses. The introduction of new methods for biological monitoring, such as environmental DNA (eDNA), presents an opportunity to standardize aquatic sampling protocols prior to widespread adoption. The objective of this study was to optimize eDNA sample replication for the consistent characterization of freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities in flowing waters, and ultimately, to inform the development of robust national monitoring standards. A comparison of field replication and extraction methods (pooling of preservation buffer) was also trialed as part of this high replication (n = 16) eDNA study to assess any potential benefits in measuring species richness and reducing processing costs alongside replication optimisation. This involved two ‘syringe’ sampling methods (‘standard’ and ‘boosted’, eight each) conducted across 54 riverine sites throughout the country. No significant difference was found for species richness between the standardized (eight replicates) or boosted (16 replicates composited to eight) eDNA methods for fish and macroinvertebrates. Results indicated that six replicates were needed to consistently detect 89.5% of fish species likely to be present using field-based syringe eDNA sampling and preservation. However, an altitudinal species richness effect was observed for fish. For macroinvertebrates, six replicates were required to identify 86% of taxa identified to the NEMS (National Environmental Monitoring Standards) level used for the Macroinvertebrate Community Index (MCI: usually genera) while eight replicates were required to detect 89% of NEMS taxa. For fish and macroinvertebrate biodiversity, this study suggests that six replicates are a reasonable trade-off between effective community characterization and cost in New Zealand lotic systems.
{"title":"Optimizing eDNA Replication for Standardized Application in Lotic Systems in Aotearoa, New Zealand","authors":"Josh Smith, Bruno David, Andy Hicks, Shaun Wilkinson, Nicolas Ling, Daniel Fake, Alastair Suren, Amy Gault","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>National standardization of ecological sampling protocols between different agencies in Aotearoa New Zealand has historically been difficult to attain, creating challenges for combining datasets for national scale analyses. The introduction of new methods for biological monitoring, such as environmental DNA (eDNA), presents an opportunity to standardize aquatic sampling protocols prior to widespread adoption. The objective of this study was to optimize eDNA sample replication for the consistent characterization of freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities in flowing waters, and ultimately, to inform the development of robust national monitoring standards. A comparison of field replication and extraction methods (pooling of preservation buffer) was also trialed as part of this high replication (<i>n</i> = 16) eDNA study to assess any potential benefits in measuring species richness and reducing processing costs alongside replication optimisation. This involved two ‘syringe’ sampling methods (‘standard’ and ‘boosted’, eight each) conducted across 54 riverine sites throughout the country. No significant difference was found for species richness between the standardized (eight replicates) or boosted (16 replicates composited to eight) eDNA methods for fish and macroinvertebrates. Results indicated that six replicates were needed to consistently detect 89.5% of fish species likely to be present using field-based syringe eDNA sampling and preservation. However, an altitudinal species richness effect was observed for fish. For macroinvertebrates, six replicates were required to identify 86% of taxa identified to the NEMS (National Environmental Monitoring Standards) level used for the Macroinvertebrate Community Index (MCI: usually genera) while eight replicates were required to detect 89% of NEMS taxa. For fish and macroinvertebrate biodiversity, this study suggests that six replicates are a reasonable trade-off between effective community characterization and cost in New Zealand lotic systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of environmental DNA to detect species is now widespread in freshwater ecology. However, the detectability of species depends on many factors, such as the quantity of eDNA particles available in the environment and their state (e.g., free DNA fragments, organellar, or aggregated DNA particles). To date, the most advanced knowledge of the production and state of DNA particles concerns teleosts. Most often, these studies target mitochondrial genes, since they are present in multiple copies in a cell. However, it is likely that the characteristics of eDNA molecules vary greatly among taxa and genetic compartments, with direct consequences for species detection. Using an indoor mesocosm experiment, we compared the rate of mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA production and particle size distribution (PSD) of four distinct and common aquatic taxa (zebrafish, tadpole, isopod and mollusk). The tank water was filtered through a series of filters with decreasing porosity and mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA at each size fraction were quantified by qPCR. We found that the production and the size of eDNA particles varied greatly among taxa and genetic compartments. For most taxa, the number of nuclear eDNA particles released in water was higher than that of mitochondrial origin. The PSD of mt-eDNA showed a pattern common to all taxa: the relative number of particles increased from the smallest size fractions (0.2 μm and less) to the largest (over 1.2 μm), while the distribution of nu-eDNA was very different from one taxon to another. We also observed a high temporal variability in the quantity of eDNA particles and in PSD, although the latter was more complex to model. These results call for caution in how to sample and analyze eDNA in aquatic environments, particularly for organisms that emit small particles in small quantities such as isopods.
目前,利用环境 DNA 检测物种已广泛应用于淡水生态学领域。然而,物种的可探测性取决于许多因素,如环境中可用的 eDNA 颗粒的数量及其状态(如游离 DNA 片段、细胞器或聚集 DNA 颗粒)。迄今为止,有关 DNA 颗粒的产生和状态的最先进知识涉及长尾目动物。这些研究通常以线粒体基因为目标,因为它们在细胞中存在多个拷贝。然而,eDNA 分子的特性在不同类群和遗传区间可能有很大差异,这对物种检测有直接影响。通过室内中观实验,我们比较了四种不同的常见水生类群(斑马鱼、蝌蚪、等足类动物和软体动物)的线粒体和核 eDNA 生成率以及粒度分布(PSD)。水箱中的水通过一系列孔隙率递减的过滤器进行过滤,线粒体和核 eDNA 在每个粒径部分的数量通过 qPCR 进行量化。我们发现,不同类群和遗传区的 eDNA 颗粒的产生和大小差异很大。对于大多数类群来说,释放到水中的核 eDNA 颗粒数量高于线粒体来源的 eDNA 颗粒。mt-eDNA 的 PSD 显示了所有类群的共同模式:颗粒的相对数量从最小尺寸部分(0.2 μm 及以下)向最大尺寸部分(1.2 μm 以上)增加,而 nu-eDNA 的分布则因类群而异。我们还观察到 eDNA 粒子数量和 PSD 的时间变化很大,尽管后者的建模更为复杂。这些结果要求我们在对水生环境中的 eDNA 进行采样和分析时要小心谨慎,特别是对于等足类动物等释放少量小颗粒的生物。
{"title":"Environmental DNA Particle Size Distribution and Quantity Differ Across Taxa and Organelles","authors":"Héloïse Verdier, Thibault Datry, Maxime Logez, Lara Konecny-Duprè, Maïlys Gauthier, Tristan Lefébure","doi":"10.1002/edn3.598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.598","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of environmental DNA to detect species is now widespread in freshwater ecology. However, the detectability of species depends on many factors, such as the quantity of eDNA particles available in the environment and their state (e.g., free DNA fragments, organellar, or aggregated DNA particles). To date, the most advanced knowledge of the production and state of DNA particles concerns teleosts. Most often, these studies target mitochondrial genes, since they are present in multiple copies in a cell. However, it is likely that the characteristics of eDNA molecules vary greatly among taxa and genetic compartments, with direct consequences for species detection. Using an indoor mesocosm experiment, we compared the rate of mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA production and particle size distribution (PSD) of four distinct and common aquatic taxa (zebrafish, tadpole, isopod and mollusk). The tank water was filtered through a series of filters with decreasing porosity and mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA at each size fraction were quantified by qPCR. We found that the production and the size of eDNA particles varied greatly among taxa and genetic compartments. For most taxa, the number of nuclear eDNA particles released in water was higher than that of mitochondrial origin. The PSD of mt-eDNA showed a pattern common to all taxa: the relative number of particles increased from the smallest size fractions (0.2 μm and less) to the largest (over 1.2 μm), while the distribution of nu-eDNA was very different from one taxon to another. We also observed a high temporal variability in the quantity of eDNA particles and in PSD, although the latter was more complex to model. These results call for caution in how to sample and analyze eDNA in aquatic environments, particularly for organisms that emit small particles in small quantities such as isopods.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.598","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tracie A. Seimon, Nguyen Van Long, Minh Le, Timothy E. M. McCormack, Tham Thi Nguyen, Hanh Ngo, Nguyen Tai Thang, Thuy Hoang, Steven G. Platt, Hoang Van Ha, Nguyen Van Trong, Brian Horne, Colleen A. Barrett, Denise McAloose, Paul P. Calle
Swinhoe's (or Yangtze) giant softshell turtle (Rafetus swinhoei) is a large, critically endangered freshwater turtle and considered among the rarest species in the world. As of 2024, only two individuals have been confirmed to remain alive, one at the Suzhou Zoo in China and one in Xuan Khanh Lake, Viet Nam. The only hope for the long-term survival of R. swinhoei is finding additional, as yet undiscovered, animals that have thus far eluded detection by traditional survey methods. In recent years, numerous studies have been published on the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for species detection and monitoring. This method takes advantage of the persistence of DNA in the environment, such as in water, soil, and air. An organism's DNA is shed into the environment through urine, feces, and the sloughing of skin. Species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing can be used to detect eDNA in samples collected from the environment. eDNA trials to detect R. swinhoei were initiated by the Asian Turtle Program and Washington State University in 2013. To expand the use of eDNA for species detection by conservationists, we developed and validated a first-of-its-kind innovative point-of-detection (POD) qPCR platform for the rapid, onsite detection of R. swinhoei from water samples. Here we show that the portable eDNA test kit can be used for the successful detection of R. swinhoei in a large body of water and that pooling filters may be a useful strategy to reduce test costs and improve detection efficiency. Use of this test can expand the search for R. swinhoei in unexplored and understudied lakes, reservoirs, and other bodies of water where this species may be present and could inform field surveys utilizing eDNA for other threatened species that are rare in nature.
斯温霍氏(或长江)大甲鱼(Rafetus swinhoei)是一种大型、极度濒危的淡水龟,被认为是世界上最稀有的物种之一。截至 2024 年,仅有两只个体被证实存活,一只在中国苏州动物园,另一只在越南宣庆湖中。薮蛙长期生存的唯一希望是找到更多尚未被发现的动物,这些动物至今仍未被传统调查方法发现。近年来,利用环境 DNA(eDNA)进行物种检测和监控的研究成果层出不穷。这种方法利用了 DNA 在水、土壤和空气等环境中的持久性。生物体的 DNA 会通过尿液、粪便和皮肤的脱落脱落到环境中。物种特异性定量聚合酶链式反应(qPCR)测试可用于检测从环境中采集的样本中的 eDNA。2013 年,亚洲海龟计划和华盛顿州立大学启动了检测 R. swinhoei 的 eDNA 试验。为了扩大 eDNA 在物种检测中的应用,我们开发并验证了一种首创的创新型检测点(POD)qPCR 平台,用于现场快速检测水样中的沼泽蛙。在这里,我们展示了便携式 eDNA 检测试剂盒可用于成功检测大型水体中的沼泽蛙病毒,而且汇集过滤器可能是降低检测成本和提高检测效率的有效策略。使用这种检测方法可以扩大在未开发和未充分研究的湖泊、水库和其他可能存在该物种的水体中对沼泽蛙的搜索范围,还可以为利用 eDNA 对其他自然界中罕见的濒危物种进行实地调查提供信息。
{"title":"Development and Application of a Portable Environmental DNA Test for the Detection of Rafetus swinhoei in Viet Nam","authors":"Tracie A. Seimon, Nguyen Van Long, Minh Le, Timothy E. M. McCormack, Tham Thi Nguyen, Hanh Ngo, Nguyen Tai Thang, Thuy Hoang, Steven G. Platt, Hoang Van Ha, Nguyen Van Trong, Brian Horne, Colleen A. Barrett, Denise McAloose, Paul P. Calle","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Swinhoe's (or Yangtze) giant softshell turtle (<i>Rafetus swinhoei</i>) is a large, critically endangered freshwater turtle and considered among the rarest species in the world. As of 2024, only two individuals have been confirmed to remain alive, one at the Suzhou Zoo in China and one in Xuan Khanh Lake, Viet Nam. The only hope for the long-term survival of <i>R. swinhoei</i> is finding additional, as yet undiscovered, animals that have thus far eluded detection by traditional survey methods. In recent years, numerous studies have been published on the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for species detection and monitoring. This method takes advantage of the persistence of DNA in the environment, such as in water, soil, and air. An organism's DNA is shed into the environment through urine, feces, and the sloughing of skin. Species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing can be used to detect eDNA in samples collected from the environment. eDNA trials to detect <i>R. swinhoei</i> were initiated by the Asian Turtle Program and Washington State University in 2013. To expand the use of eDNA for species detection by conservationists, we developed and validated a first-of-its-kind innovative point-of-detection (POD) qPCR platform for the rapid, onsite detection of <i>R. swinhoei</i> from water samples. Here we show that the portable eDNA test kit can be used for the successful detection of <i>R. swinhoei</i> in a large body of water and that pooling filters may be a useful strategy to reduce test costs and improve detection efficiency. Use of this test can expand the search for <i>R. swinhoei</i> in unexplored and understudied lakes, reservoirs, and other bodies of water where this species may be present and could inform field surveys utilizing eDNA for other threatened species that are rare in nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
María Algueró-Muñiz, Sofie Spatharis, Toni Dwyer, Michele de Noia, Bachar Cheaib, Yee Wan Liu, Brendan A. Robertson, Calum Johnstone, Jennifer Welsh, Annabell Macphee, Marta Mazurkiewicz, Ralph Bickerdike, Hervé Migaud, Clara McGhee, Kim Præbel, Martin Llewellyn
Salmonid aquaculture, a major component of the Northern European, North American, and Chilean coastal economies, is under threat from challenges to gill health, many of which originate from plankton communities. A first step toward mitigating losses is to characterize the biological drivers of poor gill health. Numerous planktonic taxa have been implicated, including toxic and siliceous microalgae, hydrozoans, and scyphozoans; however, rigorous longitudinal surveys of plankton diversity and gill health have been lacking. In the current study, we present and assess an exhaustive identification approach combining both morphological and molecular methods together with robust statistical models to identify the planktonic drivers of proliferative gill disease (PGD) and fish mortality. We undertook longitudinal evaluation at two marine aquaculture facilities on the west coast of Scotland using daily data collected during the 2021 growing season (March–October). Examining these two different sites, one sheltered and one exposed to the open sea, we identified potentially new, important, and unexpected planktonic drivers of PGD and mortality (e.g., doliolids and appendicularians) and confirmed the significance of some established threats (e.g., hydrozoans and diatoms). We also explored delayed or “lagged” effects of plankton abundances on gill health and undertook a comparison of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding and microscopy in their ability to identify and quantify planktonic species. Our data highlight the diversity of planktonic threats to salmonid aquaculture as well as the importance of using both molecular and morphological approaches to detect these. There is now an urgent need to expand systematic longitudinal molecular and morphological approaches across multiple sites and over multiple years. The resultant catalogue of main biological drivers will enable early warning systems, new treatments, and, ultimately, a sustainable platform for future salmonid aquaculture in the marine environment.
{"title":"High-Resolution Longitudinal eDNA Metabarcoding and Morphological Tracking of Planktonic Threats to Salmon Aquaculture","authors":"María Algueró-Muñiz, Sofie Spatharis, Toni Dwyer, Michele de Noia, Bachar Cheaib, Yee Wan Liu, Brendan A. Robertson, Calum Johnstone, Jennifer Welsh, Annabell Macphee, Marta Mazurkiewicz, Ralph Bickerdike, Hervé Migaud, Clara McGhee, Kim Præbel, Martin Llewellyn","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salmonid aquaculture, a major component of the Northern European, North American, and Chilean coastal economies, is under threat from challenges to gill health, many of which originate from plankton communities. A first step toward mitigating losses is to characterize the biological drivers of poor gill health. Numerous planktonic taxa have been implicated, including toxic and siliceous microalgae, hydrozoans, and scyphozoans; however, rigorous longitudinal surveys of plankton diversity and gill health have been lacking. In the current study, we present and assess an exhaustive identification approach combining both morphological and molecular methods together with robust statistical models to identify the planktonic drivers of proliferative gill disease (PGD) and fish mortality. We undertook longitudinal evaluation at two marine aquaculture facilities on the west coast of Scotland using daily data collected during the 2021 growing season (March–October). Examining these two different sites, one sheltered and one exposed to the open sea, we identified potentially new, important, and unexpected planktonic drivers of PGD and mortality (e.g., doliolids and appendicularians) and confirmed the significance of some established threats (e.g., hydrozoans and diatoms). We also explored delayed or “lagged” effects of plankton abundances on gill health and undertook a comparison of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding and microscopy in their ability to identify and quantify planktonic species. Our data highlight the diversity of planktonic threats to salmonid aquaculture as well as the importance of using both molecular and morphological approaches to detect these. There is now an urgent need to expand systematic longitudinal molecular and morphological approaches across multiple sites and over multiple years. The resultant catalogue of main biological drivers will enable early warning systems, new treatments, and, ultimately, a sustainable platform for future salmonid aquaculture in the marine environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eric A. Bonk, Robert H. Hanner, Adrienne J. Bartlett, Gerald R. Tetreault
There are numerous downsides and risks associated with electrofishing; hence, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is becoming increasingly common in aquatic ecological studies. Generally, researchers agree that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than electrofishing, and that eDNA metabarcoding is better at detecting rare species. As predatory species tend to be rarer than prey species, eDNA metabarcoding should hypothetically detect more predator species than electrofishing. Instead of supporting the notion that eDNA must replace electrofishing, or that eDNA and electrofishing must display the same results, the current study aims to establish the strengths and weaknesses of eDNA metabarcoding when compared to electrofishing. eDNA metabarcoding and electrofishing data were collected on three sampling dates at four experimental sites. A RV coefficient analysis confirmed that the eDNA metabarcoding data (RV = 0.395, p = 0.057) are statistically different from the electrofishing data. A paired Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that eDNA data collection techniques detect more predatory species than electrofishing (p = 0.041). When the analysis was conducted for prey species a statistically significant difference did not occur (p = 0.661). Overall, the results of the study suggest that eDNA metabarcoding does not display the same results as electrofishing due to eDNA metabarcoding detecting predatory species at higher rates. The combined use of eDNA alongside electrofishing can help mitigate electrofishing's bias against predatory species, while electrofishing can address reliability concerns associated with eDNA. This collaborative approach ultimately enhances the accuracy of fish community assessments.
{"title":"Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing","authors":"Eric A. Bonk, Robert H. Hanner, Adrienne J. Bartlett, Gerald R. Tetreault","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are numerous downsides and risks associated with electrofishing; hence, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is becoming increasingly common in aquatic ecological studies. Generally, researchers agree that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than electrofishing, and that eDNA metabarcoding is better at detecting rare species. As predatory species tend to be rarer than prey species, eDNA metabarcoding should hypothetically detect more predator species than electrofishing. Instead of supporting the notion that eDNA must replace electrofishing, or that eDNA and electrofishing must display the same results, the current study aims to establish the strengths and weaknesses of eDNA metabarcoding when compared to electrofishing. eDNA metabarcoding and electrofishing data were collected on three sampling dates at four experimental sites. A RV coefficient analysis confirmed that the eDNA metabarcoding data (RV = 0.395, <i>p</i> = 0.057) are statistically different from the electrofishing data. A paired Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed that eDNA data collection techniques detect more predatory species than electrofishing (<i>p</i> = 0.041). When the analysis was conducted for prey species a statistically significant difference did not occur (<i>p</i> = 0.661). Overall, the results of the study suggest that eDNA metabarcoding does not display the same results as electrofishing due to eDNA metabarcoding detecting predatory species at higher rates. The combined use of eDNA alongside electrofishing can help mitigate electrofishing's bias against predatory species, while electrofishing can address reliability concerns associated with eDNA. This collaborative approach ultimately enhances the accuracy of fish community assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142359832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}