首页 > 最新文献

Environmental DNA最新文献

英文 中文
Comparing Sediment and Water eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Aquatic Biodiversity in a Plateau Lake 高原湖泊沉积物和水体eDNA元条形码监测水生生物多样性的比较
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70244
Xiu Feng, Xiaoling Wang, Ren Zhu, Yintao Jia, Xiaoyun Sui, Zhixian Qiao, Yifeng Chen

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a powerful tool for monitoring aquatic biodiversity in extreme environments like the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP), where traditional methods face significant challenges. However, key knowledge gaps remain, particularly in selecting optimal sampling substrates for target taxonomic groups and understanding substrate-specific detection differences. Here, using eDNA metabarcoding with five primer sets (targeting mitochondrial, nuclear, and nucleoid sequences), we systematically compared biodiversity detection between sediment and water samples collected from five sites in the Dongjicuona Lake across the tree of life (encompassing archaea, bacteria, algae, fungi, plants, protozoa, invertebrates, fishes, birds, and mammals). The results showed that sediment eDNA exhibited significantly higher amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness compared to water eDNA for most taxonomic groups. In contrast, the opposite pattern was observed for fishes, while no significant differences were observed for fungi and birds. Community composition differs significantly between sediment and water samples for most taxonomic groups, except for mammals. Across all taxonomic groups, 18.0% of ASVs were shared between sediments and water, with fishes showing the highest overlap (42.6%) and archaea the lowest (4.5%). Additionally, the percentages of ASVs contributing to major community dissimilarity (cumulatively accounting for 80%) ranged from 6.4% (invertebrates) to 17.4% (protozoa), with most taxa exhibiting distinct habitat preferences. These findings support water sampling as an effective method for monitoring fish diversity, while emphasizing the need for a multi-substrate approach to comprehensively monitor other taxonomic groups in plateau lakes.

环境DNA元条形码是青藏高原等极端环境中水生生物多样性监测的有力工具,传统方法在这些极端环境中面临重大挑战。然而,关键的知识差距仍然存在,特别是在为目标分类群选择最佳采样底物和了解底物特异性检测差异方面。本文采用五组引物(分别针对线粒体、细胞核和类核序列)的eDNA元条形码技术,系统比较了东鸡鸟湖五个地点沉积物和水样的生物多样性检测结果,涵盖了古生菌、细菌、藻类、真菌、植物、原生动物、无脊椎动物、鱼类、鸟类和哺乳动物)。结果表明,在大多数分类类群中,沉积物eDNA的扩增子序列变异(ASV)丰富度明显高于水体eDNA。相反,在鱼类中观察到相反的模式,而在真菌和鸟类中没有观察到显著差异。除哺乳动物外,大多数分类类群在沉积物和水样之间的群落组成有显著差异。在所有分类类群中,18.0%的asv在沉积物和水之间共享,其中鱼类的重叠率最高(42.6%),古细菌的重叠率最低(4.5%)。此外,asv对主要群落差异的贡献百分比(累计占80%)从6.4%(无脊椎动物)到17.4%(原生动物)不等,大多数分类群表现出不同的栖息地偏好。这些发现支持了水样作为监测鱼类多样性的有效方法,同时强调了对高原湖泊其他分类类群进行多基质综合监测的必要性。
{"title":"Comparing Sediment and Water eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Aquatic Biodiversity in a Plateau Lake","authors":"Xiu Feng,&nbsp;Xiaoling Wang,&nbsp;Ren Zhu,&nbsp;Yintao Jia,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Sui,&nbsp;Zhixian Qiao,&nbsp;Yifeng Chen","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70244","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a powerful tool for monitoring aquatic biodiversity in extreme environments like the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP), where traditional methods face significant challenges. However, key knowledge gaps remain, particularly in selecting optimal sampling substrates for target taxonomic groups and understanding substrate-specific detection differences. Here, using eDNA metabarcoding with five primer sets (targeting mitochondrial, nuclear, and nucleoid sequences), we systematically compared biodiversity detection between sediment and water samples collected from five sites in the Dongjicuona Lake across the tree of life (encompassing archaea, bacteria, algae, fungi, plants, protozoa, invertebrates, fishes, birds, and mammals). The results showed that sediment eDNA exhibited significantly higher amplicon sequence variant (ASV) richness compared to water eDNA for most taxonomic groups. In contrast, the opposite pattern was observed for fishes, while no significant differences were observed for fungi and birds. Community composition differs significantly between sediment and water samples for most taxonomic groups, except for mammals. Across all taxonomic groups, 18.0% of ASVs were shared between sediments and water, with fishes showing the highest overlap (42.6%) and archaea the lowest (4.5%). Additionally, the percentages of ASVs contributing to major community dissimilarity (cumulatively accounting for 80%) ranged from 6.4% (invertebrates) to 17.4% (protozoa), with most taxa exhibiting distinct habitat preferences. These findings support water sampling as an effective method for monitoring fish diversity, while emphasizing the need for a multi-substrate approach to comprehensively monitor other taxonomic groups in plateau lakes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70244","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consistent Species Richness Patterns but Not Richness Estimates Based on Both ASV and OTU Inference Methods on ITS2-Based Soil Fungal Communities 基于ASV和OTU推断方法的its2土壤真菌群落物种丰富度模式一致但不一致
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70246
Julia Kyaschenko, Jeanette Tångrot, Anders Dahlberg, Björn D. Lindahl, Anna Rosling

Fungi play essential roles in key ecosystem functions and processes, yet they often occur in inconspicuous, species-rich, and complex communities that remain difficult to study. Studies of fungal communities based on DNA extracted from environmental samples commonly rely on clustering sequence reads into units of diversity, followed by taxonomic identification and, in some cases, linkage to ecological traits. In this study, we evaluated how two clustering approaches—amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and operational taxonomic units (OTUs)—affect the characterization of fungal communities. Despite minor differences, both approaches recovered consistent taxonomic patterns and community structure. Although both methods produced a similar total number of sequence clusters, they differed in representation of fungal community composition. All ASV representative sequences matched OTU representative sequences with at least 92.2% similarity, whereas several rare OTUs showed low similarity to ASV reads, suggesting differences in the detection of low-abundance taxa. However, only a small fraction of OTU reads (< 0.1%) lacked a corresponding ASV, indicating that ASVs captured nearly all OTU-defined taxa. In contrast, 14% of ASV reads assigned to species hypotheses (SHs) did not match any OTU reads assigned to SHs, whereas only 1.3% of OTU SH-assigned reads lacked a corresponding ASV match. ASVs generally provided higher resolution than OTUs, as abundant SHs were often represented by multiple ASVs, suggesting that ASVs capture intraspecific diversity. Consequently, ASVs should not be used as direct species proxies but instead require post hoc grouping to reflect species-level diversity. OTUs-based community composition aligned more clearly with soil properties, particularly the N:C ratio. Overall, both approaches provided a similar overview of broad-scale species richness. The choice between two clustering methods depends on the research question and the desired level of taxonomic resolution, and our results provide little support for the claim that ASVs should categorically replace taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis.

真菌在关键的生态系统功能和过程中起着至关重要的作用,但它们经常出现在不显眼、物种丰富和复杂的群落中,这些群落仍然难以研究。基于从环境样本中提取的DNA的真菌群落研究通常依赖于对多样性单位的聚类序列读取,然后是分类鉴定,在某些情况下,与生态性状的联系。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种聚类方法-扩增子序列变异(asv)和操作分类单位(OTUs) -如何影响真菌群落的表征。尽管存在微小差异,但两种方法都恢复了一致的分类模式和群落结构。虽然这两种方法产生的序列簇总数相似,但它们在真菌群落组成的代表性方面有所不同。所有ASV代表序列与OTU代表序列的相似度至少为92.2%,而少数罕见的OTU与ASV reads的相似度较低,提示低丰度分类群的检测存在差异。然而,只有一小部分OTU reads(0.1%)缺乏相应的ASV,这表明ASV几乎捕获了所有OTU定义的分类群。相比之下,分配给物种假设(SHs)的14%的ASV读取与分配给SHs的任何OTU读取不匹配,而只有1.3%的OTU sh指定读取缺乏相应的ASV匹配。asv通常比otu提供更高的分辨率,因为丰富的SHs通常由多个asv代表,这表明asv捕获了种内多样性。因此,asv不应该被用作直接的物种代理,而是需要事后分组来反映物种水平的多样性。以otus为基地的群落组成与土壤性质,特别是氮碳比更为一致。总的来说,这两种方法提供了类似的大尺度物种丰富度概述。两种聚类方法之间的选择取决于研究问题和分类分辨率的期望水平,我们的结果很少支持asv应该在标记基因数据分析中分类取代分类单位的主张。
{"title":"Consistent Species Richness Patterns but Not Richness Estimates Based on Both ASV and OTU Inference Methods on ITS2-Based Soil Fungal Communities","authors":"Julia Kyaschenko,&nbsp;Jeanette Tångrot,&nbsp;Anders Dahlberg,&nbsp;Björn D. Lindahl,&nbsp;Anna Rosling","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70246","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fungi play essential roles in key ecosystem functions and processes, yet they often occur in inconspicuous, species-rich, and complex communities that remain difficult to study. Studies of fungal communities based on DNA extracted from environmental samples commonly rely on clustering sequence reads into units of diversity, followed by taxonomic identification and, in some cases, linkage to ecological traits. In this study, we evaluated how two clustering approaches—amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and operational taxonomic units (OTUs)—affect the characterization of fungal communities. Despite minor differences, both approaches recovered consistent taxonomic patterns and community structure. Although both methods produced a similar total number of sequence clusters, they differed in representation of fungal community composition. All ASV representative sequences matched OTU representative sequences with at least 92.2% similarity, whereas several rare OTUs showed low similarity to ASV reads, suggesting differences in the detection of low-abundance taxa. However, only a small fraction of OTU reads (&lt; 0.1%) lacked a corresponding ASV, indicating that ASVs captured nearly all OTU-defined taxa. In contrast, 14% of ASV reads assigned to species hypotheses (SHs) did not match any OTU reads assigned to SHs, whereas only 1.3% of OTU SH-assigned reads lacked a corresponding ASV match. ASVs generally provided higher resolution than OTUs, as abundant SHs were often represented by multiple ASVs, suggesting that ASVs capture intraspecific diversity. Consequently, ASVs should not be used as direct species proxies but instead require post hoc grouping to reflect species-level diversity. OTUs-based community composition aligned more clearly with soil properties, particularly the N:C ratio. Overall, both approaches provided a similar overview of broad-scale species richness. The choice between two clustering methods depends on the research question and the desired level of taxonomic resolution, and our results provide little support for the claim that ASVs should categorically replace taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70246","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096603","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted Airborne eDNA of an Invasive Wallaby: Effects of Sampler Type, Distance, and Environmental Conditions 入侵小袋鼠的机载eDNA:采样器类型、距离和环境条件的影响
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70240
Gracie C. Kroos, Kristen Fernandes, Philip Seddon, Travis Ashcroft, William S. Pearman, Neil J. Gemmell

Bennett's wallabies Notamacropus rufogriseus, introduced to New Zealand from Australia in the late 1800s, strongly exemplify the detection challenges posed by invasive terrestrial species that are rare, cryptic, and highly mobile. Across their invasive range, N. rufogriseus occupy large landscapes at low densities, making their surveillance challenging. Recent research has demonstrated that airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) can rapidly identify terrestrial vertebrate diversity in an area. Leveraging these findings, we investigate the utility of airborne eDNA for the targeted monitoring of N. rufogriseus, using a novel, probe-based quantitative PCR assay. The effects of filtration material, collection method (active versus passive), distance from the source, and environmental conditions were examined for their effects on airborne detection probability, using a captive population of wallabies in a controlled park setting. A total of 110 airborne samples were collected, 55 with active (battery-powered fan) samplers and 55 passive (nonpowered) samplers, across six distinct experimental periods at distances of 0, 10, 100, and 1000 m from the closest known source of wallaby DNA. Filters designed to capture coarse particles (> 10 μm) significantly improved detection rates and DNA recovery for actively collected samples, compared to filters targeting finer particles (1–10 μm). Active samplers significantly outperformed passive samplers in overall detection rates, particularly at shorter ranges from the target. Distance from the source had a significant negative effect on detection probability. Detection rates declined sharply beyond 10 m but remained possible up to 1 km from the source for both collection methods. These findings demonstrate that airborne eDNA can detect terrestrial vertebrate species at ecologically relevant distances, supporting its potential for landscape-scale surveillance. Notably, these results underscore the importance of optimizing sampler design when applying airborne eDNA for targeted species monitoring.

班尼特小袋鼠(Notamacropus rufogriseus)于19世纪末从澳大利亚引入新西兰,有力地证明了稀有、神秘、高度移动的入侵陆生物种给检测带来的挑战。在它们的入侵范围内,褐灰蝽以低密度占据了大片景观,这给它们的监视带来了挑战。最近的研究表明,空气环境DNA (eDNA)可以快速识别一个地区的陆源脊椎动物多样性。利用这些发现,我们利用一种新型的探针定量PCR检测方法,研究了空气中eDNA在靶向监测褐灰稻瘟螨中的应用。在一个受控制的公园环境中,利用圈养的小袋鼠种群,研究了过滤材料、收集方法(主动或被动)、距离源的距离和环境条件对空气检测概率的影响。总共收集了110个空气样本,其中55个使用主动(电池供电的风扇)采样器,55个使用被动(无动力)采样器,跨越6个不同的实验时段,分别距离已知最近的小袋鼠DNA来源0、10、100和1000米。设计用于捕获粗颗粒(> 10 μm)的过滤器与针对细颗粒(1-10 μm)的过滤器相比,显著提高了主动采集样品的检出率和DNA回收率。主动采样器在总体检测率上明显优于被动采样器,特别是在距离目标较短的范围内。距离源对探测概率有显著的负向影响。检出率在10米以上急剧下降,但两种收集方法在距离源1公里处仍有可能。这些发现表明,空气eDNA可以在生态相关距离上检测陆源脊椎动物物种,支持其在景观规模监测方面的潜力。值得注意的是,这些结果强调了在应用机载eDNA进行目标物种监测时优化采样器设计的重要性。
{"title":"Targeted Airborne eDNA of an Invasive Wallaby: Effects of Sampler Type, Distance, and Environmental Conditions","authors":"Gracie C. Kroos,&nbsp;Kristen Fernandes,&nbsp;Philip Seddon,&nbsp;Travis Ashcroft,&nbsp;William S. Pearman,&nbsp;Neil J. Gemmell","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70240","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bennett's wallabies <i>Notamacropus rufogriseus</i>, introduced to New Zealand from Australia in the late 1800s, strongly exemplify the detection challenges posed by invasive terrestrial species that are rare, cryptic, and highly mobile. Across their invasive range, <i>N. rufogriseus</i> occupy large landscapes at low densities, making their surveillance challenging. Recent research has demonstrated that airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) can rapidly identify terrestrial vertebrate diversity in an area. Leveraging these findings, we investigate the utility of airborne eDNA for the targeted monitoring of <i>N. rufogriseus</i>, using a novel, probe-based quantitative PCR assay. The effects of filtration material, collection method (active versus passive), distance from the source, and environmental conditions were examined for their effects on airborne detection probability, using a captive population of wallabies in a controlled park setting. A total of 110 airborne samples were collected, 55 with active (battery-powered fan) samplers and 55 passive (nonpowered) samplers, across six distinct experimental periods at distances of 0, 10, 100, and 1000 m from the closest known source of wallaby DNA. Filters designed to capture coarse particles (&gt; 10 μm) significantly improved detection rates and DNA recovery for actively collected samples, compared to filters targeting finer particles (1–10 μm). Active samplers significantly outperformed passive samplers in overall detection rates, particularly at shorter ranges from the target. Distance from the source had a significant negative effect on detection probability. Detection rates declined sharply beyond 10 m but remained possible up to 1 km from the source for both collection methods. These findings demonstrate that airborne eDNA can detect terrestrial vertebrate species at ecologically relevant distances, supporting its potential for landscape-scale surveillance. Notably, these results underscore the importance of optimizing sampler design when applying airborne eDNA for targeted species monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70240","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best Practice Guidelines for Targeted Environmental DNA-Based Proficiency Testing in Non-Regulatory Contexts 非监管环境中基于dna的环境能力测试最佳实践指南
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70189
Margaret E. Hunter, Adam J. Sepulveda, Dianne M. Gleeson, Alejandro Trujillo-González, Caren C. Helbing, Helen C. Rees, Devin N. Jones-Slobodian, Rachel C. Miliano, Toshifumi Minamoto, Susanna Theroux, Cecilia Villacorta Rath, Taylor Wilcox, Hiroki Yamanaka, Katy E. Klymus

The effective use of environmental DNA (eDNA) tools is contingent on strict adherence to established and validated methods. Differences in eDNA methods and quality assurance protocols may contribute to variability in results. However, quality assurance measures such as proficiency testing can provide independent evaluation of laboratory performance against pre-established test criteria. With this commentary, we discuss how broad implementation of recurring proficiency testing in eDNA laboratories can build decision-maker confidence in eDNA results. It can also create a culture of continuous evaluation and improvement that minimizes error and meets performance requirements to inform the sustainable use or monitoring of natural resources. We provide an overview of proficiency testing across molecular disciplines, review the state of proficiency testing in eDNA applications, and draft a roadmap for the expanded application of proficiency testing informed by best practices for targeted eDNA detection. We suggest that best practice proficiency testing can be conducted by an independent, third-party sample provider. By demonstrating that laboratories are competent and capable of producing reliable results, implementation of proficiency testing best practices should foster confidence in eDNA measurements and its use in decision-making processes. Increased confidence in eDNA methods and a clear expectation of what is considered satisfactory performance are also likely to create more favorable conditions for investments in eDNA-based monitoring.

环境DNA (eDNA)工具的有效使用取决于严格遵守已建立和验证的方法。eDNA方法和质量保证协议的差异可能导致结果的差异。然而,质量保证措施,如能力测试,可以根据预先建立的测试标准提供对实验室性能的独立评估。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了如何在eDNA实验室广泛实施循环能力测试,以建立决策者对eDNA结果的信心。它还可以创造一种持续评价和改进的文化,以最大限度地减少错误并满足绩效要求,从而为自然资源的可持续利用或监测提供信息。我们概述了分子学科的能力测试,回顾了eDNA应用中能力测试的现状,并根据靶向eDNA检测的最佳实践为能力测试的扩展应用起草了路线图。我们建议由独立的第三方样本提供商进行最佳实践能力测试。通过证明实验室有能力并有能力产生可靠的结果,熟练测试最佳实践的实施应该促进对eDNA测量及其在决策过程中的使用的信心。对eDNA方法的信心增强以及对令人满意的表现的明确期望也可能为基于eDNA的监测的投资创造更有利的条件。
{"title":"Best Practice Guidelines for Targeted Environmental DNA-Based Proficiency Testing in Non-Regulatory Contexts","authors":"Margaret E. Hunter,&nbsp;Adam J. Sepulveda,&nbsp;Dianne M. Gleeson,&nbsp;Alejandro Trujillo-González,&nbsp;Caren C. Helbing,&nbsp;Helen C. Rees,&nbsp;Devin N. Jones-Slobodian,&nbsp;Rachel C. Miliano,&nbsp;Toshifumi Minamoto,&nbsp;Susanna Theroux,&nbsp;Cecilia Villacorta Rath,&nbsp;Taylor Wilcox,&nbsp;Hiroki Yamanaka,&nbsp;Katy E. Klymus","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70189","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The effective use of environmental DNA (eDNA) tools is contingent on strict adherence to established and validated methods. Differences in eDNA methods and quality assurance protocols may contribute to variability in results. However, quality assurance measures such as proficiency testing can provide independent evaluation of laboratory performance against pre-established test criteria. With this commentary, we discuss how broad implementation of recurring proficiency testing in eDNA laboratories can build decision-maker confidence in eDNA results. It can also create a culture of continuous evaluation and improvement that minimizes error and meets performance requirements to inform the sustainable use or monitoring of natural resources. We provide an overview of proficiency testing across molecular disciplines, review the state of proficiency testing in eDNA applications, and draft a roadmap for the expanded application of proficiency testing informed by best practices for targeted eDNA detection. We suggest that best practice proficiency testing can be conducted by an independent, third-party sample provider. By demonstrating that laboratories are competent and capable of producing reliable results, implementation of proficiency testing best practices should foster confidence in eDNA measurements and its use in decision-making processes. Increased confidence in eDNA methods and a clear expectation of what is considered satisfactory performance are also likely to create more favorable conditions for investments in eDNA-based monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70189","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
eDNA Metabarcoding as a Promising Conservation Tool to Monitor Fish Diversity in Indonesia Marine Protected Areas eDNA元条形码作为一种有前途的保护工具监测印度尼西亚海洋保护区的鱼类多样性
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70242
Ni Kadek Dita Cahyani, Aji Wahyu Anggoro, Rian Prasetia, Yuliana Fitri Syamsuni, Muhammad Danie Al Malik, Eka Maya Kurniasih, Nining Nursalim, Nenik Kholilah, Fauzi Muh, Ambariyanto Ambariyanto, Muhidin Muhidin, Sukmarahaja A. R. Tarigan, Widyastuti Widyastuti

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) play a crucial role in conserving marine biodiversity while providing ecological, social, and economic benefits. Effective monitoring is essential for assessing changes in biodiversity and ensuring the sustainability of MPAs. In this context, biodiversity monitoring in Karimunjawa National Park (KNP) provides an excellent opportunity to examine effective monitoring practices. Traditionally, biodiversity assessments have been conducted through visual census methods, which have limitations such as challenges in species identification, time constraints, and high survey costs. To complement visual surveys, this study employed environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding with the 12S rRNA gene, utilizing Oxford Nanopore sequencing to assess fish diversity across different zonation systems within KNP. eDNA analysis detected a total of 183 fish species, with 87 species (38% of the 229 species recorded by visual census) and 25 families (71%) shared between the two methods. Alpha diversity (ANOVA, p > 0.05) showed no significant differences between sites and zonation, whereas community structure (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05) revealed significant differences between sites and zonation. Additionally, eDNA offered complementary insights by detecting broader functional traits than the visual census, such as nocturnal behavior, habitat preferences, and migratory variations of fish species, whereas the visual census predominantly only recorded reef-associated and nonmigratory taxa. These findings demonstrate that eDNA, particularly when integrated with Oxford Nanopore sequencing, is a powerful tool for marine biodiversity monitoring. Standardizing bioinformatics workflows is crucial for ensuring data comparability and maximizing the effectiveness of eDNA-based conservation strategies in Indonesia's MPAs.

海洋保护区在保护海洋生物多样性和提供生态、社会和经济效益方面发挥着至关重要的作用。有效的监测对于评估生物多样性的变化和确保海洋保护区的可持续性至关重要。在此背景下,Karimunjawa国家公园(KNP)的生物多样性监测为审查有效的监测做法提供了一个极好的机会。传统的生物多样性评估是通过目视普查方法进行的,这种方法存在物种识别困难、时间限制和调查成本高等局限性。为了补充视觉调查,本研究采用12S rRNA基因的环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码,利用牛津纳米孔测序来评估KNP内不同分区系统的鱼类多样性。eDNA分析共检测到183种鱼类,其中87种(占目测普查229种的38%),25科(71%)两种方法共有。Alpha多样性(ANOVA, p > 0.05)在样地和地带性之间无显著差异,而群落结构(PERMANOVA, p < 0.05)在样地和地带性之间存在显著差异。此外,eDNA通过检测比视觉普查更广泛的功能特征提供了补充的见解,例如夜间行为,栖息地偏好和鱼类的迁徙变化,而视觉普查主要只记录了与珊瑚礁相关的和非迁徙的分类群。这些发现表明,eDNA,特别是当与牛津纳米孔测序相结合时,是海洋生物多样性监测的有力工具。标准化生物信息学工作流程对于确保数据可比性和最大化印度尼西亚海洋保护区中基于edna的保护策略的有效性至关重要。
{"title":"eDNA Metabarcoding as a Promising Conservation Tool to Monitor Fish Diversity in Indonesia Marine Protected Areas","authors":"Ni Kadek Dita Cahyani,&nbsp;Aji Wahyu Anggoro,&nbsp;Rian Prasetia,&nbsp;Yuliana Fitri Syamsuni,&nbsp;Muhammad Danie Al Malik,&nbsp;Eka Maya Kurniasih,&nbsp;Nining Nursalim,&nbsp;Nenik Kholilah,&nbsp;Fauzi Muh,&nbsp;Ambariyanto Ambariyanto,&nbsp;Muhidin Muhidin,&nbsp;Sukmarahaja A. R. Tarigan,&nbsp;Widyastuti Widyastuti","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70242","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) play a crucial role in conserving marine biodiversity while providing ecological, social, and economic benefits. Effective monitoring is essential for assessing changes in biodiversity and ensuring the sustainability of MPAs. In this context, biodiversity monitoring in Karimunjawa National Park (KNP) provides an excellent opportunity to examine effective monitoring practices. Traditionally, biodiversity assessments have been conducted through visual census methods, which have limitations such as challenges in species identification, time constraints, and high survey costs. To complement visual surveys, this study employed environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding with the 12S rRNA gene, utilizing Oxford Nanopore sequencing to assess fish diversity across different zonation systems within KNP. eDNA analysis detected a total of 183 fish species, with 87 species (38% of the 229 species recorded by visual census) and 25 families (71%) shared between the two methods. Alpha diversity (ANOVA, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) showed no significant differences between sites and zonation, whereas community structure (PERMANOVA, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) revealed significant differences between sites and zonation. Additionally, eDNA offered complementary insights by detecting broader functional traits than the visual census, such as nocturnal behavior, habitat preferences, and migratory variations of fish species, whereas the visual census predominantly only recorded reef-associated and nonmigratory taxa. These findings demonstrate that eDNA, particularly when integrated with Oxford Nanopore sequencing, is a powerful tool for marine biodiversity monitoring. Standardizing bioinformatics workflows is crucial for ensuring data comparability and maximizing the effectiveness of eDNA-based conservation strategies in Indonesia's MPAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70242","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Watershed-Based eDNA Sampling and Camera Trapping for Assessing Mammal Diversity in North-Western Bhutan 比较基于流域的eDNA采样和相机捕获用于评估不丹西北部哺乳动物多样性
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70243
Karma Sherub, Sarah Thurnheer, Martina Lüthi, Virginie Marques, Arnaud Lyet, Tashi Dhendup, Lungten Dorji, Camille Albouy, Loïc Pellissier

The ability of environmental DNA (eDNA) to provide rapid assessments of mammal taxa composition at the watershed scale can make it an efficient survey method on large-scale landscapes, complementing camera traps. Due to the rugged and inaccessible terrain of many areas in Bhutan, camera trapping is associated with logistical challenges, increasing the cost of sampling considerably. In this study, conducted in the Upper Punatsangchhu catchment basin of Bhutan, we investigated the ability of eDNA water samples to capture the diversity of terrestrial mammals in comparison with camera trapping, using six watersheds within the basin as a baseline sampling frame. Combined, the two methods detected a total of 72 mammalian species: eDNA metabarcoding identified 60 species, while camera trapping detected 33 species, with an overlap of 21 species between the two methods. In addition, eDNA metabarcoding detected 90% of the IUCN Red List species detected by the camera traps. Small mammals were frequently detected using eDNA metabarcoding, while camera trapping more often detected large mammals. The mean detection probabilities recorded from eDNA were higher for all species grouped by orders and size categories compared with camera trapping. Biodiversity models based on eDNA metabarcoding and camera trapping both retrieved dominant effects of temperature and isolation in structuring the mammal assemblage. We conclude that eDNA sampling based on watersheds accurately represents the spatial distribution of species across each watershed in our study area in Bhutan to provide a rapid assessment of mammals from river water.

环境DNA (environmental DNA, eDNA)在流域尺度上提供哺乳动物类群组成快速评估的能力,使其成为一种有效的大尺度景观调查方法,可作为相机陷阱的补充。由于不丹许多地区地形崎岖,难以进入,相机捕获与后勤挑战有关,大大增加了采样成本。在这项研究中,我们在不丹的Upper Punatsangchhu流域进行,研究了eDNA水样与相机捕获的能力,并将流域内的6个流域作为基线采样框架。两种方法共检测到72种哺乳动物物种:eDNA元条形码检测到60种,相机捕获检测到33种,两种方法之间有21种重叠。此外,eDNA元条形码检测到90%的IUCN红色名录物种。小型哺乳动物通常使用eDNA元条形码检测,而摄像机捕获更常用于检测大型哺乳动物。与摄像机捕获相比,eDNA记录的所有物种的平均检测概率都更高。基于eDNA元条形码和相机捕获的生物多样性模型都可以获得温度和隔离对哺乳动物组合结构的主导影响。我们的结论是,基于流域的eDNA采样准确地代表了我们在不丹研究区域的每个流域的物种空间分布,为来自河水的哺乳动物提供了快速评估。
{"title":"Comparing Watershed-Based eDNA Sampling and Camera Trapping for Assessing Mammal Diversity in North-Western Bhutan","authors":"Karma Sherub,&nbsp;Sarah Thurnheer,&nbsp;Martina Lüthi,&nbsp;Virginie Marques,&nbsp;Arnaud Lyet,&nbsp;Tashi Dhendup,&nbsp;Lungten Dorji,&nbsp;Camille Albouy,&nbsp;Loïc Pellissier","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70243","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ability of environmental DNA (eDNA) to provide rapid assessments of mammal taxa composition at the watershed scale can make it an efficient survey method on large-scale landscapes, complementing camera traps. Due to the rugged and inaccessible terrain of many areas in Bhutan, camera trapping is associated with logistical challenges, increasing the cost of sampling considerably. In this study, conducted in the Upper Punatsangchhu catchment basin of Bhutan, we investigated the ability of eDNA water samples to capture the diversity of terrestrial mammals in comparison with camera trapping, using six watersheds within the basin as a baseline sampling frame. Combined, the two methods detected a total of 72 mammalian species: eDNA metabarcoding identified 60 species, while camera trapping detected 33 species, with an overlap of 21 species between the two methods. In addition, eDNA metabarcoding detected 90% of the IUCN Red List species detected by the camera traps. Small mammals were frequently detected using eDNA metabarcoding, while camera trapping more often detected large mammals. The mean detection probabilities recorded from eDNA were higher for all species grouped by orders and size categories compared with camera trapping. Biodiversity models based on eDNA metabarcoding and camera trapping both retrieved dominant effects of temperature and isolation in structuring the mammal assemblage. We conclude that eDNA sampling based on watersheds accurately represents the spatial distribution of species across each watershed in our study area in Bhutan to provide a rapid assessment of mammals from river water.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70243","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Seasonal Rhythms of Coastal eDNA: Insights Into Biodiversity and Regional Detection Patterns 沿海eDNA的季节节律:对生物多样性和区域检测模式的见解
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70236
Melissa K. Morrison, Kimberly Howland, Erin K. Grey, Timothy J. Barrett, Claudio DiBacco, Meghan C. McBride, Maelle Sevellec, Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is a non-invasive monitoring approach increasingly used to detect marine organisms; however, misunderstandings of the temporal variability in eDNA detection have limited its integration within management decisions. A clearer understanding of the periodicity (e.g., seasonality) and duration (e.g., weeks, months) of species eDNA detection is essential to optimize sampling design and data interpretation. As such, this study aims to provide a representative assessment of optimal eDNA detection windows across diverse taxonomic groups, primers, and geographic regions using eDNA metabarcoding. Coastal marine presence-absence eDNA data were collected along the Northwest Atlantic coast, in the Bay of Fundy, Scotian Shelf, and Baffin Island. eDNA detection window(s) were defined as unimodal, contiguous months having greater than 75% detection probability and were calculated for each taxon for each primer in each region. Most marine species exhibited short eDNA detection windows (1–2 months). The optimal sampling periods and durations were conserved among closely related species, highlighting the importance of considering biological traits when designing and interpreting eDNA studies. Additionally, primer choice influenced the optimal detection periods, with higher seasonal variation in community composition and detection rates using universal COI and 18S primers compared to fish 16S and 12S primers. These results demonstrate that ignoring seasonal variation may cause false negatives, inefficient sampling, and reduced data comparability across independent studies. Thus, we propose a set of guidelines aimed at the development of optimal sampling designs for coastal ecosystems and the interpretation of trends across datasets.

环境DNA (eDNA)是一种非侵入性监测方法,越来越多地用于检测海洋生物;然而,对eDNA检测的时间变异性的误解限制了其在管理决策中的整合。更清楚地了解物种eDNA检测的周期性(如季节性)和持续时间(如周、月)对于优化采样设计和数据解释至关重要。因此,本研究旨在利用eDNA元条形码对不同分类群体、引物和地理区域的最佳eDNA检测窗口进行具有代表性的评估。沿西北大西洋海岸、芬迪湾、苏格兰陆架和巴芬岛收集了沿海海洋存在-缺失eDNA数据。eDNA检测窗口(s)定义为单峰,连续月份检测概率大于75%,并计算每个区域每个引物的每个分类群。大多数海洋物种的eDNA检测窗口较短(1-2个月)。在密切相关的物种中,最佳采样周期和持续时间是保守的,这突出了在设计和解释eDNA研究时考虑生物学特性的重要性。此外,引物的选择影响了最佳检测周期,使用通用COI和18S引物的群落组成和检出率的季节变化高于使用16S和12S引物的鱼类。这些结果表明,忽视季节变化可能导致假阴性,采样效率低下,并降低了独立研究之间的数据可比性。因此,我们提出了一套指导方针,旨在开发沿海生态系统的最佳采样设计和跨数据集的趋势解释。
{"title":"The Seasonal Rhythms of Coastal eDNA: Insights Into Biodiversity and Regional Detection Patterns","authors":"Melissa K. Morrison,&nbsp;Kimberly Howland,&nbsp;Erin K. Grey,&nbsp;Timothy J. Barrett,&nbsp;Claudio DiBacco,&nbsp;Meghan C. McBride,&nbsp;Maelle Sevellec,&nbsp;Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70236","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) is a non-invasive monitoring approach increasingly used to detect marine organisms; however, misunderstandings of the temporal variability in eDNA detection have limited its integration within management decisions. A clearer understanding of the periodicity (e.g., seasonality) and duration (e.g., weeks, months) of species eDNA detection is essential to optimize sampling design and data interpretation. As such, this study aims to provide a representative assessment of optimal eDNA detection windows across diverse taxonomic groups, primers, and geographic regions using eDNA metabarcoding. Coastal marine presence-absence eDNA data were collected along the Northwest Atlantic coast, in the Bay of Fundy, Scotian Shelf, and Baffin Island. eDNA detection window(s) were defined as unimodal, contiguous months having greater than 75% detection probability and were calculated for each taxon for each primer in each region. Most marine species exhibited short eDNA detection windows (1–2 months). The optimal sampling periods and durations were conserved among closely related species, highlighting the importance of considering biological traits when designing and interpreting eDNA studies. Additionally, primer choice influenced the optimal detection periods, with higher seasonal variation in community composition and detection rates using universal COI and 18S primers compared to fish 16S and 12S primers. These results demonstrate that ignoring seasonal variation may cause false negatives, inefficient sampling, and reduced data comparability across independent studies. Thus, we propose a set of guidelines aimed at the development of optimal sampling designs for coastal ecosystems and the interpretation of trends across datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70236","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
VHSV and IHNV in the Environment: Assessment and Comparison of eRNA-Based Methods for Detection in Aquaculture 环境中的VHSV和IHNV:水产养殖中基于dna检测方法的评价和比较
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70241
Giulia Zarantonello, Dagoberto Sepúlveda Araneda, Niccolò Vendramin, Andrea Marsella, Niels Lorenzen, Argelia Cuenca

Infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) are major pathogens in aquaculture. Detection of both viruses requires lethal sampling, as it is typically performed by testing of internal organs. However, this approach only identifies the pathogens once viral transmission has already occurred and infection is underway. As both viruses can spread through water, an efficient environmental detection method could significantly improve disease control and prevention of transmission, and enhance welfare by reducing lethal sampling. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of detecting IHNV and VHSV environmental RNA (eRNA) in water during in vivo infection trials in Oncorhynchus mykiss, using RT-qPCR. By sampling at multiple time points post-exposure, we could evaluate the efficacy of detection at decreasing viral concentration in water over time. Viral eRNA was recovered using different methods: viral concentration with polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, filter membranes, filtered water, or unprocessed water samples. RT-qPCR values were compared to the quantification of infectious particles using viral titration, with RT-qPCR consistently detecting higher eRNA copies/mL than the cell-based assay to detect infectious particles (TCID50/mL). eRNA detection from the filter membranes significantly outperformed the other tested methods, enhancing eRNA recovery particularly at lower viral concentrations. Notably, eRNA detection in water was still possible after the peak of mortality for both viruses. Additionally, IHNV eRNA was successfully detected in farm water samples, even up to 50 days post initial fish tissue diagnosis, confirming the feasibility under real conditions. This study provides the first quantification of IHNV eRNA from aquaculture water and demonstrates the effectiveness of a filtration-based viral concentration method for environmental surveillance. These findings suggest that eRNA-based RT-qPCR detection of IHNV and VHSV from water could be a valuable addition to current diagnostic tools, potentially enabling earlier detection and improved containment in aquaculture and the surrounding environment.

传染性造血坏死病毒(IHNV)和病毒性出血性败血症病毒(VHSV)是水产养殖的主要病原体。这两种病毒的检测都需要致命取样,因为它通常是通过检测内部器官来进行的。然而,这种方法只有在病毒传播已经发生和感染正在进行时才能识别病原体。由于这两种病毒都可以通过水传播,有效的环境检测方法可以显著改善疾病控制和预防传播,并通过减少致命采样来提高福利。本研究利用RT-qPCR技术,评估了在猪吻Oncorhynchus体内感染试验中检测水中IHNV和VHSV环境RNA (eRNA)的可行性。通过在暴露后的多个时间点采样,我们可以评估检测在水中随着时间降低病毒浓度的效果。采用不同的方法回收病毒eRNA:用聚乙二醇(PEG)沉淀物、过滤膜、过滤水或未处理水样进行病毒浓缩。将RT-qPCR值与病毒滴定法的感染性颗粒定量进行比较,RT-qPCR检测到的eRNA拷贝数/mL始终高于基于细胞的感染性颗粒检测(TCID50/mL)。过滤膜上的eRNA检测明显优于其他测试方法,特别是在较低病毒浓度下,提高了eRNA的回收率。值得注意的是,在这两种病毒的死亡率达到高峰后,仍然可以在水中检测到eRNA。此外,在农场水样中成功检测到IHNV eRNA,甚至在最初的鱼组织诊断后长达50天,证实了在实际条件下的可行性。本研究首次提供了水产养殖水中IHNV eRNA的定量,并证明了基于过滤的病毒浓度法用于环境监测的有效性。这些发现表明,基于rna的RT-qPCR检测水中的IHNV和VHSV可能是对现有诊断工具的一个有价值的补充,有可能实现早期检测并改善水产养殖和周围环境的遏制。
{"title":"VHSV and IHNV in the Environment: Assessment and Comparison of eRNA-Based Methods for Detection in Aquaculture","authors":"Giulia Zarantonello,&nbsp;Dagoberto Sepúlveda Araneda,&nbsp;Niccolò Vendramin,&nbsp;Andrea Marsella,&nbsp;Niels Lorenzen,&nbsp;Argelia Cuenca","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70241","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) are major pathogens in aquaculture. Detection of both viruses requires lethal sampling, as it is typically performed by testing of internal organs. However, this approach only identifies the pathogens once viral transmission has already occurred and infection is underway. As both viruses can spread through water, an efficient environmental detection method could significantly improve disease control and prevention of transmission, and enhance welfare by reducing lethal sampling. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of detecting IHNV and VHSV environmental RNA (eRNA) in water during in vivo infection trials in <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>, using RT-qPCR. By sampling at multiple time points post-exposure, we could evaluate the efficacy of detection at decreasing viral concentration in water over time. Viral eRNA was recovered using different methods: viral concentration with polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, filter membranes, filtered water, or unprocessed water samples. RT-qPCR values were compared to the quantification of infectious particles using viral titration, with RT-qPCR consistently detecting higher eRNA copies/mL than the cell-based assay to detect infectious particles (TCID<sub>50</sub>/mL). eRNA detection from the filter membranes significantly outperformed the other tested methods, enhancing eRNA recovery particularly at lower viral concentrations. Notably, eRNA detection in water was still possible after the peak of mortality for both viruses. Additionally, IHNV eRNA was successfully detected in farm water samples, even up to 50 days post initial fish tissue diagnosis, confirming the feasibility under real conditions. This study provides the first quantification of IHNV eRNA from aquaculture water and demonstrates the effectiveness of a filtration-based viral concentration method for environmental surveillance. These findings suggest that eRNA-based RT-qPCR detection of IHNV and VHSV from water could be a valuable addition to current diagnostic tools, potentially enabling earlier detection and improved containment in aquaculture and the surrounding environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70241","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146007328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hummingbird Feeders Can Provide eDNA for Detection of Nectar-Feeding Bats 蜂鸟喂食者可提供检测采蜜蝙蝠的eDNA
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70234
Anna L. Riley, Daniel E. Sanchez, Kristen Lear, Rachel Burke, Brianna Mann, Faith M. Walker

In the face of ongoing anthropogenic pressures on global biodiversity, effective monitoring strategies are essential for understanding species distributions and guiding conservation. Leptonycteris nivalis, L. yerbabuenae, and Choeronycteris mexicana are nectar-feeding bats of conservation concern that occur in the southwestern United States and Mexico. Leptonycteris nivalis and L. yerbabuenae are morphologically similar and difficult to differentiate in the field, making eDNA a particularly relevant monitoring tool. Since previous studies have shown that eDNA detection of these species is possible when swabs are taken from their dietary flowers, we sought to determine whether they can be detected from artificial feeders, which are commonly used on residential properties to attract hummingbirds and are a known supplemental food source for L. yerbabuenae. Between 2023 and 2024, citizen scientists (n = 12) in Arizona and New Mexico took 306 swabs of hummingbird feeders, which we tested with an existing qPCR assay for L. nivalis and newly-developed qPCR assays for L. yerbabuenae and C. mexicana. Leptonycteris yerbabuenae and C. mexicana showed the highest number of detections (300 and 274 swabs, respectively). Previously only known to occur in the U.S. in Texas and New Mexico, we detected L. nivalis near Portal, Arizona, within 50 km of documented foraging range in western New Mexico. Detections of this endangered species suggest its range extends beyond Hidalgo County, New Mexico and into neighboring Cochise County, Arizona, highlighting a need for increased surveillance of this species. Our work with artificial nectar feeders expands the eDNA detection method for nectar-feeding bats to the human-wildlife interface and shows that citizen science can be successfully used for eDNA surveys. Such methods provide an alternative to mist netting or acoustics, which can help monitor occupancy and clarify range extensions. This work corroborates other studies illustrating that eDNA can effectively detect and monitor terrestrial species.

面对全球生物多样性持续的人为压力,有效的监测策略对于了解物种分布和指导保护至关重要。nivalis Leptonycteris, L. yerbabuenae和Choeronycteris mexicana是发生在美国西南部和墨西哥的保护关注的食蜜蝙蝠。nivalis leptonyteris和L. yerbabuenae在形态上相似,在野外很难区分,这使得eDNA成为特别相关的监测工具。由于先前的研究表明,当从这些物种的膳食花中提取棉签时,可以检测到这些物种的eDNA,因此我们试图确定是否可以从人工喂食器中检测到它们,人工喂食器通常用于住宅建筑中吸引蜂鸟,并且是已知的yerbabuenae的补充食物来源。在2023年至2024年期间,亚利桑那州和新墨西哥州的公民科学家(n = 12)采集了306份蜂鸟喂食者的拭子,我们使用现有的L. nivalis qPCR检测方法和新开发的L. yerbabuenae和C. mexicana qPCR检测方法进行了测试。检出数量最多的是嫩黄瘦杆菌和墨西哥乳杆菌(分别为300份和274份)。以前只知道发生在美国德克萨斯州和新墨西哥州,我们在亚利桑那州的Portal附近发现了L. nivalis,在新墨西哥州西部有记录的觅食范围50公里内。对这种濒危物种的检测表明,它的活动范围已经超出了新墨西哥州的伊达尔戈县,并进入了邻近的亚利桑那州的科奇斯县,这突出了对这种物种加强监测的必要性。我们对人工采蜜蝙蝠的研究将采蜜蝙蝠的eDNA检测方法扩展到人类与野生动物的界面,并表明公民科学可以成功地用于eDNA调查。这种方法提供了雾网或声学的替代方案,可以帮助监测占用情况并明确范围扩展。这项工作证实了其他研究表明,eDNA可以有效地检测和监测陆生物种。
{"title":"Hummingbird Feeders Can Provide eDNA for Detection of Nectar-Feeding Bats","authors":"Anna L. Riley,&nbsp;Daniel E. Sanchez,&nbsp;Kristen Lear,&nbsp;Rachel Burke,&nbsp;Brianna Mann,&nbsp;Faith M. Walker","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70234","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the face of ongoing anthropogenic pressures on global biodiversity, effective monitoring strategies are essential for understanding species distributions and guiding conservation. <i>Leptonycteris nivalis</i>, <i>L. yerbabuenae</i>, and <i>Choeronycteris mexicana</i> are nectar-feeding bats of conservation concern that occur in the southwestern United States and Mexico. <i>Leptonycteris nivalis</i> and <i>L. yerbabuenae</i> are morphologically similar and difficult to differentiate in the field, making eDNA a particularly relevant monitoring tool. Since previous studies have shown that eDNA detection of these species is possible when swabs are taken from their dietary flowers, we sought to determine whether they can be detected from artificial feeders, which are commonly used on residential properties to attract hummingbirds and are a known supplemental food source for <i>L. yerbabuenae</i>. Between 2023 and 2024, citizen scientists (<i>n</i> = 12) in Arizona and New Mexico took 306 swabs of hummingbird feeders, which we tested with an existing qPCR assay for <i>L. nivalis</i> and newly-developed qPCR assays for <i>L. yerbabuenae</i> and <i>C. mexicana</i>. <i>Leptonycteris yerbabuenae</i> and <i>C. mexicana</i> showed the highest number of detections (300 and 274 swabs, respectively). Previously only known to occur in the U.S. in Texas and New Mexico, we detected <i>L. nivalis</i> near Portal, Arizona, within 50 km of documented foraging range in western New Mexico. Detections of this endangered species suggest its range extends beyond Hidalgo County, New Mexico and into neighboring Cochise County, Arizona, highlighting a need for increased surveillance of this species. Our work with artificial nectar feeders expands the eDNA detection method for nectar-feeding bats to the human-wildlife interface and shows that citizen science can be successfully used for eDNA surveys. Such methods provide an alternative to mist netting or acoustics, which can help monitor occupancy and clarify range extensions. This work corroborates other studies illustrating that eDNA can effectively detect and monitor terrestrial species.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70234","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146007501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First European Interlaboratory Ring Test Study to Detect DNA of Crayfish and the Crayfish Plague Pathogen From Water Samples 欧洲首个从水样中检测小龙虾DNA和小龙虾鼠疫病原体的实验室间环试验研究
IF 6.2 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1002/edn3.70238
Patrik Bohman, Kristofer Andersson, David A. Strand, Thomas Baudry, Kathrin Theissinger, Ivana Maguire, Michael Aluma, Anna Aspán, Martin Bláha, Ljudevit Luka Bostjancic, Carine Delaunay, Javier Diéguez-Uribeondo, Lennart Edsman, Fabio Ercoli, Jean-Yves Georges, Frédéric Grandjean, Bogna Griffin, Terhi Iso-Touru, Birgitta Jacobsson, Katrin Kaldre, Alex King, Pavel Kozák, Lucija Markulin, María Martínez-Ríos, Laura Martín-Torrijos, Saima Mohammad, Michaela Mojžišová, Teja Petra Muha, Ludvig Orsén, John Persson, Simone Roberto Rolando Pisano, Lilian Pukk, Björn Rogell, Timo J. Ruokonen, Heike Schmidt-Posthaus, Jonas Steiner, Linda Söderberg, Anti Vasemägi, Armin Zenker, Adam Petrusek

In recent years, European countries have intensified efforts to control or limit the spread of invasive freshwater crayfish and the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci, while working to conserve native species such as the noble crayfish (Astacus astacus). Although crayfish shed relatively low amounts of DNA into their environment, environmental DNA (eDNA) approaches have proven effective for detecting their presence. A range of protocols and equipment is currently used in eDNA-based monitoring of freshwater crayfish. To evaluate how methodological variation influences detection accuracy, we conducted the first European interlaboratory ring test using eDNA to detect A. astacus, the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus, a chronic carrier of A. astaci, and the pathogen itself. The aim is to harmonize monitoring methods for crayfish and disease surveillance across laboratories. Eleven teams from thirteen European countries participated, each using its own equipment and protocols to collect and filter water from indoor tanks and outdoor ponds where the presence of A. astacus and P. leniusculus had been experimentally manipulated, as well as from a natural lake containing a P. leniusculus population. The resulting samples were analyzed in each team's laboratory. Despite methodological differences, all teams successfully detected DNA from both crayfish species in indoor tanks (3–10 crayfish/m3). However, detection accuracy declined in outdoor ponds where crayfish density was an order of magnitude lower (0.32 crayfish/m3). Detection was most variable for A. astaci, likely due to its very low prevalence in the host stock. Our study demonstrates the challenges of achieving consistent eDNA results across laboratories and highlights the importance of interlaboratory comparisons. It also underscores the need to identify sources of variability and error, an essential step toward developing robust and standardized protocols. This multinational intercalibration and exchange of knowledge improved methodology and enhanced reliability in crayfish detection.

近年来,欧洲各国加强了控制或限制入侵淡水小龙虾和小龙虾鼠疫病原体亚洲小龙虾(Aphanomyces astaci)的传播,同时努力保护尊贵小龙虾(Astacus Astacus)等本地物种。虽然小龙虾向环境中释放的DNA相对较少,但环境DNA (eDNA)方法已被证明对检测它们的存在是有效的。目前,基于edna的淡水小龙虾监测采用了一系列的方案和设备。为了评估方法差异对检测准确性的影响,我们利用eDNA进行了欧洲首个实验室间环试验,以检测astacus、侵染信号小龙虾Pacifastacus leniusculus (astaci的慢性携带者)和病原体本身。目的是协调各实验室对小龙虾和疾病监测的监测方法。来自13个欧洲国家的11个小组参加了这项研究,每个小组都使用自己的设备和规程,从室内水箱和室外池塘收集和过滤水,这些池塘在实验上控制了阿斯达库斯和扁圆藻的存在,以及从一个含有扁圆藻种群的天然湖泊收集和过滤水。得到的样本在每个小组的实验室进行分析。尽管方法不同,但所有团队都成功地在室内水箱(3-10只小龙虾/立方米)中检测了两种小龙虾的DNA。然而,在小龙虾密度低一个数量级(0.32只/m3)的室外池塘中,检测精度下降。阿斯塔伊螨的检测变化最大,可能是由于其在宿主种群中的流行率很低。我们的研究证明了在实验室中获得一致的eDNA结果的挑战,并强调了实验室间比较的重要性。它还强调需要确定可变性和错误的来源,这是制定健全和标准化协议的重要步骤。这种跨国的相互校准和知识交流改进了小龙虾检测的方法并提高了可靠性。
{"title":"First European Interlaboratory Ring Test Study to Detect DNA of Crayfish and the Crayfish Plague Pathogen From Water Samples","authors":"Patrik Bohman,&nbsp;Kristofer Andersson,&nbsp;David A. Strand,&nbsp;Thomas Baudry,&nbsp;Kathrin Theissinger,&nbsp;Ivana Maguire,&nbsp;Michael Aluma,&nbsp;Anna Aspán,&nbsp;Martin Bláha,&nbsp;Ljudevit Luka Bostjancic,&nbsp;Carine Delaunay,&nbsp;Javier Diéguez-Uribeondo,&nbsp;Lennart Edsman,&nbsp;Fabio Ercoli,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Georges,&nbsp;Frédéric Grandjean,&nbsp;Bogna Griffin,&nbsp;Terhi Iso-Touru,&nbsp;Birgitta Jacobsson,&nbsp;Katrin Kaldre,&nbsp;Alex King,&nbsp;Pavel Kozák,&nbsp;Lucija Markulin,&nbsp;María Martínez-Ríos,&nbsp;Laura Martín-Torrijos,&nbsp;Saima Mohammad,&nbsp;Michaela Mojžišová,&nbsp;Teja Petra Muha,&nbsp;Ludvig Orsén,&nbsp;John Persson,&nbsp;Simone Roberto Rolando Pisano,&nbsp;Lilian Pukk,&nbsp;Björn Rogell,&nbsp;Timo J. Ruokonen,&nbsp;Heike Schmidt-Posthaus,&nbsp;Jonas Steiner,&nbsp;Linda Söderberg,&nbsp;Anti Vasemägi,&nbsp;Armin Zenker,&nbsp;Adam Petrusek","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70238","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, European countries have intensified efforts to control or limit the spread of invasive freshwater crayfish and the crayfish plague pathogen <i>Aphanomyces astaci</i>, while working to conserve native species such as the noble crayfish (<i>Astacus astacus</i>). Although crayfish shed relatively low amounts of DNA into their environment, environmental DNA (eDNA) approaches have proven effective for detecting their presence. A range of protocols and equipment is currently used in eDNA-based monitoring of freshwater crayfish. To evaluate how methodological variation influences detection accuracy, we conducted the first European interlaboratory ring test using eDNA to detect <i>A. astacus</i>, the invasive signal crayfish <i>Pacifastacus leniusculus</i>, a chronic carrier of <i>A. astaci</i>, and the pathogen itself. The aim is to harmonize monitoring methods for crayfish and disease surveillance across laboratories. Eleven teams from thirteen European countries participated, each using its own equipment and protocols to collect and filter water from indoor tanks and outdoor ponds where the presence of <i>A. astacus</i> and <i>P. leniusculus</i> had been experimentally manipulated, as well as from a natural lake containing a <i>P. leniusculus</i> population. The resulting samples were analyzed in each team's laboratory. Despite methodological differences, all teams successfully detected DNA from both crayfish species in indoor tanks (3–10 crayfish/m<sup>3</sup>). However, detection accuracy declined in outdoor ponds where crayfish density was an order of magnitude lower (0.32 crayfish/m<sup>3</sup>). Detection was most variable for <i>A. astaci</i>, likely due to its very low prevalence in the host stock. Our study demonstrates the challenges of achieving consistent eDNA results across laboratories and highlights the importance of interlaboratory comparisons. It also underscores the need to identify sources of variability and error, an essential step toward developing robust and standardized protocols. This multinational intercalibration and exchange of knowledge improved methodology and enhanced reliability in crayfish detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70238","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146027546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Environmental DNA
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1