Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1353/esq.2023.a909775
Katrina Marie Dzyak, Tenisha McDonald, Nicole Musselman, Hyunjoo Yu, Max Chapnick, Devon Bradley, Chantelle Escobar Leswell, Emma Horst, Joe Hansen, Max Chapnick, Andy Harper
The Year in Conferences—2022 Katrina Marie Dzyak (bio), Tenisha McDonald (bio), Nicole Musselman (bio), Hyunjoo Yu (bio), Max Chapnick (bio), Devon Bradley (bio), Chantelle Escobar Leswell (bio), Emma Horst (bio), Joe Hansen (bio), Max Chapnick (bio), and Andy Harper (bio) The “Year in Conferences” (YiC) accelerates the circulation of ideas among scholars by covering the field’s major conferences. Graduate students from across the country collaboratively author an article that appears annually in ESQ’s first issue. Now in its fourteenth year, this report includes ALA and C19. c19, march 31–april 2 2022, coral gables, fl written by: katrina marie dzyak, tenisha mcdonald, nicole musselman, and hyunjoo yu senior advisor: max chapnick C19: The Society of Nineteenth-Century Americanists gathered for its first in-person conference since 2018 in Coral Gables, Florida, and appropriately addressed the (broadly conceptualized) theme of Reconstruction. Plenary speaker Desmond Meade, President of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition and Chair of Floridians for a Fair Democracy, joined virtually; severe storms and the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic disrupted many conference-goers’ flights. The seventh biennial conference’s material conditions could not escape reminders of ongoing crises in public health, democracy, racial capitalism, and climate catastrophe, and the papers presented addressed similar themes. Many panels connected the literary and the historical and are here arranged around the topics of justice, geography and race, print culture, embodiment [End Page 103] and feeling, reconstructing form, gender and sexuality, and literary radicals. Together, they reveal the embeddedness of literature in these various historical movements and in the collective attempts to reconstruct our world. Program link: https://c19conference.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/c19-program-2022-2.pdf environmental justice Panelists on “Being Together” explored social, class, and material links between disparate individuals and milieus. To begin, Michelle Neely decentered Henry David Thoreau by considering how the Transcendentalist writer links Native history, extermination, and immortal pines in The Maine Woods (1864). While readers today would likely consider restoring the trees to Indigenous communities, Thoreau uses them to rhetorically sanction ongoing non-Native settlement. Colleen Boggs turned to Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1885) to consider how the novel theorizes the US’s post-Reconstruction financial landscape. Boggs read Huck’s decided poverty as a type of social death. Huck’s decision prompts readers to consider poverty’s appearance and definition in a period of rapid and racial economic shifts. Finally, Dominic Mastroianni traced Ralph Waldo Emerson’s attention to how lifeforms from atoms to humans re-encounter each other after significant time apart. No matter the mode of re-encounter, Emerson’s writings show that all matter eventually recognizes
“会议年”(YiC)通过报道该领域的主要会议,加速了学者之间的思想交流。“会议年”(YiC)通过报道该领域的主要会议,加速了学者之间的思想交流。来自全国各地的研究生合作撰写了一篇文章,每年出现在ESQ的第一期。今年是该报告发布的第14个年头,其中包括ALA和C19。c19, 3月31日至2022年4月2日,珊瑚山布尔斯,佛罗里达州,由:卡特里娜玛丽dzyak, tenisha麦克唐纳,妮可·马塞尔曼和hyunjoo yu高级顾问:马克斯·查尼克c19: 19世纪美国学家协会聚集在珊瑚山布尔斯,佛罗里达州,自2018年以来的第一次面对面会议,并适当地解决(广泛概念化)重建的主题。全体会议发言人Desmond Meade,佛罗里达权利恢复联盟主席和佛罗里达人争取公平民主主席,参加了虚拟会议;严重的风暴和持续的Covid-19大流行扰乱了许多与会者的航班。第七届两年一次的会议的物质条件不能不让人想起公共卫生、民主、种族资本主义和气候灾难等正在发生的危机,而提交的论文也讨论了类似的主题。许多展板将文学和历史联系在一起,围绕着正义、地理和种族、印刷文化、体现和感觉、重构形式、性别和性以及文学激进等主题进行安排。它们共同揭示了文学在这些不同的历史运动和重建我们世界的集体尝试中的嵌入性。节目链接:https://c19conference.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/c19-program-2022-2.pdf环境正义“在一起”专题小组探讨了不同个人和环境之间的社会、阶级和物质联系。首先,米歇尔·尼利通过思考这位先验主义作家如何将《缅因森林》(1864)中的土著历史、灭绝和不朽的松树联系起来,使亨利·大卫·梭罗脱离了现实。虽然今天的读者可能会考虑将这些树恢复到土著社区,但梭罗用它们来修辞地批准正在进行的非土著定居。科琳·博格斯转向马克·吐温的《哈克贝利·费恩历险记》(1885),思考这部小说如何将美国重建后的金融格局理论化。博格斯把哈克的贫穷看作是一种社会死亡。哈克的决定促使读者思考在一个种族经济快速变化的时期,贫困的出现和定义。最后,多米尼克·马斯楚安尼追溯了拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生对从原子到人类的生命形式在分开一段时间后如何重新相遇的关注。无论重新相遇的方式如何,爱默生的作品表明,所有的物质最终都会认识到自己。马斯楚安尼认为,爱默生的认识论斗争产生了一种通过分离与物质在一起的风格,这种风格保持了一种普遍的节奏。“C19”的小组成员,或者…?:环境人文学科中的重构时间”促使学者们开始讨论出版和所有权的能量来源。杰米·l·琼斯(Jamie L. Jones)追溯了海洋作为物质和隐喻是如何体现历史、社会和生存的。根据琼斯的说法,修辞隐喻倾向于“逃离现场”,而在黑人激进理论和史学中,海洋隐喻是解放的潜在载体。安娜·施瓦茨追溯了对仙人掌的科学研究和文学表现,以表明这种植物是如何阻碍早期殖民科学的。施瓦茨认为,西方的记录表明,仙人掌的形状和丰富程度抵制了材料和认识论的管理。这样的历史破坏了殖民地科学方法的假定权威,并揭示了移民-殖民地科学家的不确定性和无能。詹妮弗·詹姆斯(Jennifer James)通过采纳大卫·沃克(David Walker)对国家和社会意识形态阻止黑人拥有土地的阴险手段的批评,考虑了私有制的替代方案。詹姆斯特别使用了“占有”一词来表明,在一个承认地球不能被拥有的社会中,不可能建立一个黑人公地。最后,斯蒂芬妮·富特考虑了纸的生产、流通和腐烂,纸是一种既传递信息又预示着自己消亡的材料。富特促使观众思考纸张的双重传承,包括它所保存的文本以及它对生态和物质的影响。在“重建地球:土壤、技术和环境不公”一文中,小组成员……
{"title":"The Year in Conferences—2022","authors":"Katrina Marie Dzyak, Tenisha McDonald, Nicole Musselman, Hyunjoo Yu, Max Chapnick, Devon Bradley, Chantelle Escobar Leswell, Emma Horst, Joe Hansen, Max Chapnick, Andy Harper","doi":"10.1353/esq.2023.a909775","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2023.a909775","url":null,"abstract":"The Year in Conferences—2022 Katrina Marie Dzyak (bio), Tenisha McDonald (bio), Nicole Musselman (bio), Hyunjoo Yu (bio), Max Chapnick (bio), Devon Bradley (bio), Chantelle Escobar Leswell (bio), Emma Horst (bio), Joe Hansen (bio), Max Chapnick (bio), and Andy Harper (bio) The “Year in Conferences” (YiC) accelerates the circulation of ideas among scholars by covering the field’s major conferences. Graduate students from across the country collaboratively author an article that appears annually in ESQ’s first issue. Now in its fourteenth year, this report includes ALA and C19. c19, march 31–april 2 2022, coral gables, fl written by: katrina marie dzyak, tenisha mcdonald, nicole musselman, and hyunjoo yu senior advisor: max chapnick C19: The Society of Nineteenth-Century Americanists gathered for its first in-person conference since 2018 in Coral Gables, Florida, and appropriately addressed the (broadly conceptualized) theme of Reconstruction. Plenary speaker Desmond Meade, President of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition and Chair of Floridians for a Fair Democracy, joined virtually; severe storms and the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic disrupted many conference-goers’ flights. The seventh biennial conference’s material conditions could not escape reminders of ongoing crises in public health, democracy, racial capitalism, and climate catastrophe, and the papers presented addressed similar themes. Many panels connected the literary and the historical and are here arranged around the topics of justice, geography and race, print culture, embodiment [End Page 103] and feeling, reconstructing form, gender and sexuality, and literary radicals. Together, they reveal the embeddedness of literature in these various historical movements and in the collective attempts to reconstruct our world. Program link: https://c19conference.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/c19-program-2022-2.pdf environmental justice Panelists on “Being Together” explored social, class, and material links between disparate individuals and milieus. To begin, Michelle Neely decentered Henry David Thoreau by considering how the Transcendentalist writer links Native history, extermination, and immortal pines in The Maine Woods (1864). While readers today would likely consider restoring the trees to Indigenous communities, Thoreau uses them to rhetorically sanction ongoing non-Native settlement. Colleen Boggs turned to Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1885) to consider how the novel theorizes the US’s post-Reconstruction financial landscape. Boggs read Huck’s decided poverty as a type of social death. Huck’s decision prompts readers to consider poverty’s appearance and definition in a period of rapid and racial economic shifts. Finally, Dominic Mastroianni traced Ralph Waldo Emerson’s attention to how lifeforms from atoms to humans re-encounter each other after significant time apart. No matter the mode of re-encounter, Emerson’s writings show that all matter eventually recognizes ","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135052898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1353/esq.2023.a909774
Vanessa Steinroetter
“Painted for Posterity”: Guerilla Violence and Irregular Warfare in Rebecca Harding Davis’ Civil War Writing Vanessa Steinroetter (bio) In 1904, Rebecca Harding Davis published Bits of Gossip, which she intended not as a traditional autobiography but rather as a cultural memoir portraying her life as well as the people and events that influenced and shaped it. Davis was then seventy-three years old and could look back on a full life and an accomplished career as a journalist and writer. As she notes in her preface to Bits of Gossip, she set out to leave behind “not the story of [her] own life, but of the time in which [s]he lived,—as [s]he saw it,—its creed, its purpose, its queer habits, and the work which it did or left undone in the world. . . . Taken singly, these accounts might be weak and trivial, but together, they would make history live and breathe.”1 The memoir she compiled consists of eight chapters spanning different periods of her life from childhood through adulthood and is filled with memorable scenes and vivid language making this part of history “live and breathe”—and none more so than “Chapter V. The Civil War.” It is in this chapter of her memoir that Davis found the most evocative language to put into words how the Civil War, especially as she experienced it in the border region of western Virginia, shaped her own life as well as those of many others, civilians and soldiers alike. Written [End Page 73] almost forty years after the end of the war, Chapter V offers Davis’ starkest and most explicit depiction of the traumatic violence and destruction visited on the Virginia borderlands by guerrilla attacks and irregular warfare. Since the start of the war, Davis had been drawn to documenting the brutality and chaos that such aggression brought to bear on the land and its people. It was clear that the viciousness of guerrilla fighters and other armed groups had deeply impressed Davis as the worst aspect of the war in the borderlands. In a letter to her friend and editor James T. Fields from October 31, 1861, she had written, “God grant the war may never be to you in Boston what it is to us here.”2 In the years that followed, she became only more outspoken in her depiction and condemnation of irregular warfare. She included references to this violence and its traumatic effects in many of her stories set during the Civil War, including “Ellen,” “John Lamar,” “David Gaunt,” and “Captain Jean” (the latter set in the Missouri/Kansas border region). Even after the war had ended, she returned to these themes again in her essay “The Mean Face of War” (1899), prompted by the reality of the Spanish-American War to remind readers of the viciousness, lawlessness, and moral lapses that transformed average Americans into “murderers” and “thieves” during the Civil War, even those serving in official armies.3 In this essay, I examine Davis’ literary portrayals of the death and destruction caused by guerrillas and irregular warfare in the border r
《为后人而画》:丽贝卡·哈丁·戴维斯的《内战》中的游击暴力和非正规战争凡妮莎·施泰因罗特(传记)1904年,丽贝卡·哈丁·戴维斯出版了《小道消息》,她不打算将其作为传统的自传,而是作为一部文化回忆录,描绘她的生活以及影响和塑造她生活的人物和事件。戴维斯当时已经73岁了,回首往事,他已经是一名记者和作家了。正如她在《小道消息》的序言中所指出的,她打算留下的“不是[她]自己的生活故事,而是[s]他所生活的时代的故事,[s]他所看到的,-它的信条,它的目的,它的奇怪习惯,以及它在世界上所做或未做的工作. . . .。单独来看,这些记录可能是软弱和微不足道的,但放在一起,它们将使历史鲜活起来。她编写的这本回忆录由八个章节组成,跨越了她从童年到成年的不同生活时期,充满了令人难忘的场景和生动的语言,使这段历史“鲜活而有气息”——其中最具代表性的是“第五章内战”。正是在她回忆录的这一章中,戴维斯找到了最令人回味的语言来描述内战,尤其是她在西弗吉尼亚边境地区经历的内战,如何塑造了她自己的生活,以及许多其他人的生活,平民和士兵都一样。第五章写于战争结束近四十年后,戴维斯对弗吉尼亚边境地区因游击袭击和非正规战争而遭受的创伤性暴力和破坏进行了最赤裸裸、最明确的描述。自战争开始以来,戴维斯一直热衷于记录这种侵略给这片土地和人民带来的残酷和混乱。很明显,游击队战士和其他武装组织的邪恶给戴维斯留下了深刻的印象,这是边境地区战争中最糟糕的一面。1861年10月31日,她在给朋友兼编辑詹姆斯·t·菲尔兹(James T. Fields)的信中写道:“上帝保佑,这场战争对你们波士顿的影响可能永远不会像对我们这里的影响一样。在接下来的几年里,她对非正规战争的描述和谴责变得更加直言不讳。她在许多以内战为背景的故事中都提到了这种暴力及其创伤性影响,包括《艾伦》、《约翰·拉马尔》、《大卫·冈特》和《吉恩上尉》(后者以密苏里/堪萨斯边境地区为背景)。即使在战争结束后,在美西战争的现实推动下,她在她的文章《战争的卑鄙面孔》(1899)中再次回到这些主题,提醒读者内战期间将普通美国人变成“杀人犯”和“小偷”的邪恶、无法无天和道德沦丧,甚至那些在官方军队服役的人也是如此在这篇文章中,我研究了戴维斯对内战期间西弗吉尼亚边境地区游击队和非正规战争造成的死亡和破坏的文学描写。通过引人注目的人体或身体部位的视觉画面,这些身体或身体部位带有暴力袭击的物质痕迹,戴维斯创造了碎片化的,令人难以忘怀的图像,让读者在她自己的生命中反复重温创伤的战争经历。在简要概述了戴维斯在弗吉尼亚边境的战时经历如何塑造了她对游击暴力和内战的看法之后,我研究了戴维斯的内战故事《艾伦》、《约翰·拉马尔》和《大卫·冈特》以及她的回忆录中对这种暴力的文学参考。这些引人注目的视觉场景比整篇关于这个主题的文章更能雄辩地讲述内战的生活现实,戴维斯试图表明似乎根本无法用语言表达的东西:在无法无天和混乱的状态下,人类能够对彼此做出的真正恐怖的事情。虽然内战是戴维斯学术研究的主要内容,并对她的作品产生了许多深刻的解释,但我的文章标志着第一次持续的研究……
{"title":"“Painted for Posterity”: Guerilla Violence and Irregular Warfare in Rebecca Harding Davis’ Civil War Writing","authors":"Vanessa Steinroetter","doi":"10.1353/esq.2023.a909774","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2023.a909774","url":null,"abstract":"“Painted for Posterity”: Guerilla Violence and Irregular Warfare in Rebecca Harding Davis’ Civil War Writing Vanessa Steinroetter (bio) In 1904, Rebecca Harding Davis published Bits of Gossip, which she intended not as a traditional autobiography but rather as a cultural memoir portraying her life as well as the people and events that influenced and shaped it. Davis was then seventy-three years old and could look back on a full life and an accomplished career as a journalist and writer. As she notes in her preface to Bits of Gossip, she set out to leave behind “not the story of [her] own life, but of the time in which [s]he lived,—as [s]he saw it,—its creed, its purpose, its queer habits, and the work which it did or left undone in the world. . . . Taken singly, these accounts might be weak and trivial, but together, they would make history live and breathe.”1 The memoir she compiled consists of eight chapters spanning different periods of her life from childhood through adulthood and is filled with memorable scenes and vivid language making this part of history “live and breathe”—and none more so than “Chapter V. The Civil War.” It is in this chapter of her memoir that Davis found the most evocative language to put into words how the Civil War, especially as she experienced it in the border region of western Virginia, shaped her own life as well as those of many others, civilians and soldiers alike. Written [End Page 73] almost forty years after the end of the war, Chapter V offers Davis’ starkest and most explicit depiction of the traumatic violence and destruction visited on the Virginia borderlands by guerrilla attacks and irregular warfare. Since the start of the war, Davis had been drawn to documenting the brutality and chaos that such aggression brought to bear on the land and its people. It was clear that the viciousness of guerrilla fighters and other armed groups had deeply impressed Davis as the worst aspect of the war in the borderlands. In a letter to her friend and editor James T. Fields from October 31, 1861, she had written, “God grant the war may never be to you in Boston what it is to us here.”2 In the years that followed, she became only more outspoken in her depiction and condemnation of irregular warfare. She included references to this violence and its traumatic effects in many of her stories set during the Civil War, including “Ellen,” “John Lamar,” “David Gaunt,” and “Captain Jean” (the latter set in the Missouri/Kansas border region). Even after the war had ended, she returned to these themes again in her essay “The Mean Face of War” (1899), prompted by the reality of the Spanish-American War to remind readers of the viciousness, lawlessness, and moral lapses that transformed average Americans into “murderers” and “thieves” during the Civil War, even those serving in official armies.3 In this essay, I examine Davis’ literary portrayals of the death and destruction caused by guerrillas and irregular warfare in the border r","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135052903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1353/esq.2023.a909773
Eagan Dean
Woman in the Nineteenth Century and the Politics of Reprinting, 1845–1980 Eagan Dean (bio) In 1850, writer Margaret Fuller drowned just off the New York coast, alongside her partner Giovanni Angelo Ossoli and their toddler son Angelino. She was only forty years old. Contemporary literati mourned Fuller elaborately, dedicating memorial volumes and commemorative statues in the years after her death and offering a putative memoir constructed by several of her male peers more as a proxy for their own careers than a memorial to hers.1 The mourning particularly focused on her missing manuscript work about the doomed Italian revolution (drowned in the same ocean) and her intense and still blossoming career’s sudden abbreviation. Arthur Fuller, her brother, responded to this outpouring in 1855 by republishing Margaret Fuller’s most influential work, Woman in the Nineteenth Century (1845) in a collection with selections from her periodical work, especially her New York Tribune writing.2 Arthur Fuller published further anthologies in later years, covering most of Margaret Fuller’s oeuvre. As interest in Margaret Fuller waned in the following decades, surviving American Renaissance writers and their successors began to dismiss her and her thought. By 1885, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s son Julian Hawthorne would [End Page 39] quip, “Margaret Fuller has at last taken her place with the numberless other dismal frauds who fill the limbo of human pretension and failure,” partly because he published his father’s private criticisms about Fuller’s relationship with Giovanni Ossoli.3 Thomas Mitchell argues that Julian “inflicted decanonizing damage” which affected Fuller’s intellectual legacy for the next century.4 Donna Dickenson and later scholars have carefully considered the “Margaret myth” which the posthumous, unauthorized, and heavily fabricated Memoirs constructed after her death.5 Following Bell Gale Chevigny and Joel Myerson’s turn to biographical evidence about Fuller’s life in the 1970s, many noted scholars contended with the contrasting accounts left by Fuller’s contemporaries to construct narratives about her life and intellectual impact.6 Jeffrey Steele best contextualizes Fuller’s “many faces”: reviewing three recent Fuller biographies in 2010, Steele compares their divergences to those of her three first biographers, “Emerson, William Henry Channing, and James Freeman Clarke [who] each depicted the woman who had been ‘his’ Margaret Fuller,” arguing that Fuller’s inherently “multi-faceted” personality creates such productive deviations.7 In 1976, Chevigny analyzed Fuller’s posthumous censorship, and in 1988, Elizabeth Lennox Keyser cataloged contemporary biographers’ recuperative and interventionist choices. Other scholars attend more to Fuller’s impact than to her person: Fuller is a cornerstone of Toward a Female Genealogy of Transcendentalism (2014), in which Phyllis Cole, Jana L. Argersinger, and their contributors resituate Fuller as an intellectual fo
{"title":"Woman in the Nineteenth Century and the Politics of Reprinting, 1845–1980","authors":"Eagan Dean","doi":"10.1353/esq.2023.a909773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2023.a909773","url":null,"abstract":"Woman in the Nineteenth Century and the Politics of Reprinting, 1845–1980 Eagan Dean (bio) In 1850, writer Margaret Fuller drowned just off the New York coast, alongside her partner Giovanni Angelo Ossoli and their toddler son Angelino. She was only forty years old. Contemporary literati mourned Fuller elaborately, dedicating memorial volumes and commemorative statues in the years after her death and offering a putative memoir constructed by several of her male peers more as a proxy for their own careers than a memorial to hers.1 The mourning particularly focused on her missing manuscript work about the doomed Italian revolution (drowned in the same ocean) and her intense and still blossoming career’s sudden abbreviation. Arthur Fuller, her brother, responded to this outpouring in 1855 by republishing Margaret Fuller’s most influential work, Woman in the Nineteenth Century (1845) in a collection with selections from her periodical work, especially her New York Tribune writing.2 Arthur Fuller published further anthologies in later years, covering most of Margaret Fuller’s oeuvre. As interest in Margaret Fuller waned in the following decades, surviving American Renaissance writers and their successors began to dismiss her and her thought. By 1885, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s son Julian Hawthorne would [End Page 39] quip, “Margaret Fuller has at last taken her place with the numberless other dismal frauds who fill the limbo of human pretension and failure,” partly because he published his father’s private criticisms about Fuller’s relationship with Giovanni Ossoli.3 Thomas Mitchell argues that Julian “inflicted decanonizing damage” which affected Fuller’s intellectual legacy for the next century.4 Donna Dickenson and later scholars have carefully considered the “Margaret myth” which the posthumous, unauthorized, and heavily fabricated Memoirs constructed after her death.5 Following Bell Gale Chevigny and Joel Myerson’s turn to biographical evidence about Fuller’s life in the 1970s, many noted scholars contended with the contrasting accounts left by Fuller’s contemporaries to construct narratives about her life and intellectual impact.6 Jeffrey Steele best contextualizes Fuller’s “many faces”: reviewing three recent Fuller biographies in 2010, Steele compares their divergences to those of her three first biographers, “Emerson, William Henry Channing, and James Freeman Clarke [who] each depicted the woman who had been ‘his’ Margaret Fuller,” arguing that Fuller’s inherently “multi-faceted” personality creates such productive deviations.7 In 1976, Chevigny analyzed Fuller’s posthumous censorship, and in 1988, Elizabeth Lennox Keyser cataloged contemporary biographers’ recuperative and interventionist choices. Other scholars attend more to Fuller’s impact than to her person: Fuller is a cornerstone of Toward a Female Genealogy of Transcendentalism (2014), in which Phyllis Cole, Jana L. Argersinger, and their contributors resituate Fuller as an intellectual fo","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135053226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1353/esq.2023.a909772
Mollie Barnes
“To Mold in Clay and Carve in Stone”: Sculptural and Political Form in Margaret Fuller’s Italian Dispatches Mollie Barnes (bio) The first time I saw a bust of Hiram Powers’ Greek Slave at the Boston Public Library, I was shocked. As the mentee of an Elizabeth Barrett Browning scholar, I wondered if the statue’s meaning alters when we see the bust alone rather than the full-body version.1 Is the statue so iconic that even the abbreviated form evokes the details that make a slave a slave? Must those details be carved in stone, and visible, for the bust to mean the same thing as the notorious, full sculpture? I still wonder about the political difference between the statue and the bust when I read Margaret Fuller’s formal critiques of Powers’ other busts, especially one of John C. Calhoun, in the dispatches she published in the New-York Daily Tribune. To understand Fuller’s writing about Powers’ busts—and their reception histories and stories of transatlantic afterlives—we should first investigate how, if at all, Fuller’s antislavery sentiment affects her formal appraisals of the group she collects and curates across her late dispatches. Does she consider these formal achievements apart from the subjects that they represent? To put it baldly: how do we square her hesitation toward and criticism of the Greek Slave with her praise for the Calhoun, whatever her formal reasons [End Page 1] may be, given her increasingly fervent antislavery writing, and given her belief in the civic potential of busts and statues to educate the public throughout her 1849–50 writing? In the middle of a dispatch posted on 20 March 1849 and published 16 May 1849, Margaret Fuller turns sharply from Rome to the US and from the promise of a republic in Italy to a claim about sculpture, the artistic mode that she calls “the natural talent of an American.” “The facts of our history,” Fuller attests, “ideal and social, will be grand and of new import; it is perfectly natural to the American to mold in clay and carve in stone. The permanence of material and solid relief in the forms correspond to the positiveness of his nature better than the mere ephemeral and even tricky methods of the painter—to his need of motion and action, better than the chambered scribbling of the poet.”2 “He will thus record his best experiences,” she concludes, “and these records will adorn the noble structures that must naturally arise for the public uses of our society.” I take this passage as the inspiration and provocation for this essay that studies Fuller’s meditation on forms, especially sculpture, as a recursive preoccupation of her late journalism. As recent critical perspectives on Fuller’s Tribune articles, especially those by Sonia Di Loreto and Brigitte Bailey, emphasize, the sometimes fragmented, self-interrupting quality of her prose reflects important journalistic circumstances and artistic choices.3 Fuller’s language from spring 1849 dramatizes the very subjects that captured her geopoli
“粘土铸成,石头雕刻”:玛格丽特·富勒意大利电报中的雕塑与政治形式莫莉·巴恩斯(传记)我第一次在波士顿公共图书馆看到海勒姆·鲍尔斯的《希腊奴隶》半身像时,感到震惊。作为伊丽莎白·巴雷特·勃朗宁(Elizabeth Barrett Browning)学者的学生,我想知道,当我们只看到半身像而不是全身版本时,雕像的意义是否会发生变化这座雕像是否如此具有代表性,以至于它的缩写形式都能让人联想到使奴隶成为奴隶的细节?这些细节一定要刻在石头上,而且要清晰可见,这样半身像才与臭名昭著的完整雕塑具有同样的意义吗?当我读到玛格丽特·富勒(Margaret Fuller)在《纽约每日论坛报》(new york Daily Tribune)上发表的文章中对鲍尔斯的其他半身像,尤其是约翰·c·卡尔霍恩(John C. Calhoun)的半身像的正式批评时,我仍然想知道这座雕像和半身像之间的政治差异。要理解富勒关于鲍尔斯半身像的写作,以及他们的接受历史和跨大西洋来生的故事,我们首先应该调查富勒的反奴隶制情绪是如何影响她对她在后期报道中收集和策划的群体的正式评价的。她是否将这些正式的成就与它们所代表的主题分开来考虑?坦率地说:我们如何将她对希腊奴隶的犹豫和批评与她对卡尔霍恩的赞扬联系起来,不管她的正式理由是什么,考虑到她日益狂热的反奴隶制写作,考虑到她在1849年至1850年的写作中对胸像和雕像的公民潜力的信仰,以教育公众?在1849年3月20日发表、5月16日发表的一篇文章中,玛格丽特·富勒(Margaret Fuller)从罗马迅速转向了美国,从意大利共和国的承诺转向了关于雕塑的主张,这种艺术模式被她称为“美国人的天赋”。富勒证明:“我们的历史事实,无论是理想的还是社会的,都将是伟大的,具有新的意义;对美国人来说,用粘土铸模,用石头雕刻是再自然不过的事了。形式中物质的永恒和坚实的浮雕比画家的短暂甚至狡猾的方法更符合他本性的积极性,比诗人的室内涂鸦更符合他对运动和行动的需要。“因此,他将记录下自己最好的经历,”她总结道,“这些记录将装饰我们社会的公共用途自然产生的高贵结构。”我把这段话作为这篇文章的灵感和激发,研究富勒对形式的思考,尤其是雕塑,作为她后期新闻业的递归关注。正如最近对富勒的《论坛报》文章的批评观点,特别是索尼娅·迪·洛雷托和布丽吉特·贝利的文章所强调的那样,她的散文有时支离破碎,自我中断的品质反映了重要的新闻环境和艺术选择富勒的《1849年春》的语言戏剧化了她在这一时期对地缘政治的想象:作为一名报道新闻的外国记者,她在复杂的时间性中挣扎,而这些新闻可能会延迟几周甚至几个月才传达给读者。事实上,这篇文章是在富勒发表两个月后才发表的。她可能不是第一个思考代表性危机的浪漫主义作家(谁会选择粘土和石头而不是油漆或墨水?)为什么?)4。然而,富勒在1849年3月/ 5月的那篇报道中对雕塑的持久性的质疑,恰恰值得我们停下来思考,因为在美国和意大利历史的这个转折点上,她非常自觉地意识到自己作为一名跨大西洋记者的责任。在这篇文章中,我研究了富勒晚期作品中的一些段落,在这些段落中,她对侨民雕塑的批评表明,美学形式与政治和哲学改革之间存在联系,尤其是与奴隶制有关的联系,看似矛盾。正如我所展示的,富勒对托马斯·克劳福德、霍雷肖·格里诺和海勒姆·鲍尔斯的研究揭示了她在写作中不断发展的反奴隶制意识,这些写作据称是关于艺术的。事实上,正是在这些时刻,她暗示艺术或美学形式和政治价值可能……
{"title":"“To Mold in Clay and Carve in Stone”: Sculptural and Political Form in Margaret Fuller’s Italian Dispatches","authors":"Mollie Barnes","doi":"10.1353/esq.2023.a909772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2023.a909772","url":null,"abstract":"“To Mold in Clay and Carve in Stone”: Sculptural and Political Form in Margaret Fuller’s Italian Dispatches Mollie Barnes (bio) The first time I saw a bust of Hiram Powers’ Greek Slave at the Boston Public Library, I was shocked. As the mentee of an Elizabeth Barrett Browning scholar, I wondered if the statue’s meaning alters when we see the bust alone rather than the full-body version.1 Is the statue so iconic that even the abbreviated form evokes the details that make a slave a slave? Must those details be carved in stone, and visible, for the bust to mean the same thing as the notorious, full sculpture? I still wonder about the political difference between the statue and the bust when I read Margaret Fuller’s formal critiques of Powers’ other busts, especially one of John C. Calhoun, in the dispatches she published in the New-York Daily Tribune. To understand Fuller’s writing about Powers’ busts—and their reception histories and stories of transatlantic afterlives—we should first investigate how, if at all, Fuller’s antislavery sentiment affects her formal appraisals of the group she collects and curates across her late dispatches. Does she consider these formal achievements apart from the subjects that they represent? To put it baldly: how do we square her hesitation toward and criticism of the Greek Slave with her praise for the Calhoun, whatever her formal reasons [End Page 1] may be, given her increasingly fervent antislavery writing, and given her belief in the civic potential of busts and statues to educate the public throughout her 1849–50 writing? In the middle of a dispatch posted on 20 March 1849 and published 16 May 1849, Margaret Fuller turns sharply from Rome to the US and from the promise of a republic in Italy to a claim about sculpture, the artistic mode that she calls “the natural talent of an American.” “The facts of our history,” Fuller attests, “ideal and social, will be grand and of new import; it is perfectly natural to the American to mold in clay and carve in stone. The permanence of material and solid relief in the forms correspond to the positiveness of his nature better than the mere ephemeral and even tricky methods of the painter—to his need of motion and action, better than the chambered scribbling of the poet.”2 “He will thus record his best experiences,” she concludes, “and these records will adorn the noble structures that must naturally arise for the public uses of our society.” I take this passage as the inspiration and provocation for this essay that studies Fuller’s meditation on forms, especially sculpture, as a recursive preoccupation of her late journalism. As recent critical perspectives on Fuller’s Tribune articles, especially those by Sonia Di Loreto and Brigitte Bailey, emphasize, the sometimes fragmented, self-interrupting quality of her prose reflects important journalistic circumstances and artistic choices.3 Fuller’s language from spring 1849 dramatizes the very subjects that captured her geopoli","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135052340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1353/esq.2023.a909776
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/esq.2023.a909776","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2023.a909776","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135052640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Thoreau's Saxon Letters","authors":"Annie Abrams","doi":"10.1353/esq.2022.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2022.0014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"68 1","pages":"463 - 486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41666713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"\"If Actresses Ever Are Themselves\": Living Pictures, Dying Women, and British Class Pretensions in Alcott's Behind a Mask","authors":"Michael d'Alessandro","doi":"10.1353/esq.2022.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2022.0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"68 1","pages":"423 - 461"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48629426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Thoreauvian Disappointment: Losing the Plot in The Maine Woods","authors":"Rachael Dewitt","doi":"10.1353/esq.2022.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2022.0015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"68 1","pages":"487 - 522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49295131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"\"We uncertain step\": Emily Dickinson, Disability, and Embodied Learning","authors":"Jess Libow","doi":"10.1353/esq.2022.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2022.0009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53169,"journal":{"name":"ESQ-A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN RENAISSANCE","volume":"68 1","pages":"305 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42721735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}