{"title":"YAU-RCC Insights from AUA25 Annual Meeting: the crossfire of progress. Single-port vs. multi-port robotic surgery for kidney cancer.","authors":"Riccardo Bertolo, Riccardo Campi, Riccardo Autorino, Simone Crivellaro, Daniele Amparore","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06690-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06690-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"580-583"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06400-6
Elisa Fabbro, Giulia Zamagni, Giulia Carreras, Luca Falzone, Silvano Gallus, Giuseppe Gorini, Paolo Lauriola, Carlo LA Vecchia, Caterina Ledda, Andrea Maugeri, Giuseppe Minervini, Mohsen Naghavi, Goran L Omer, Mario V Papa, Simone Perna, Lorenzo Monasta, Roberto Passera
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most prevalent cancer globally and a major cause of disability and mortality. Survival rates heavily depend on the stage at which the disease is diagnosed, with substantial geographical variations in the burden of the disease.
Methods: The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021 provides detailed national and subnational estimates for the burden of PCa in Italy. This study reports incident cases and age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), deaths and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR), disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and age-standardized DALYs rates (ASDR), as well as the average annual rate of change (ARC). The PCa-related survival is investigated using the mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) for 1990 and 2021. Italian estimates were compared with Global and High-middle Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) countries.
Results: GBD 2021 estimated 39,016 new PCa cases, 10,662 deaths, and 173,048 DALYs for Italy in 2021. The average ARC for ASIR was 0.14, while the average ARC for ASMR and ASDR were -0.29 and -0.31, respectively. MIR dropped from 38.0 in 1990 to 23.8 in 2021. At the subnational level, ASIR increased in seven regions, with no regions showing a decrease, while ASMR and ASDR fell significantly in 17 regions. Italy outperformed both global and high-middle SDI countries in reducing PCa mortality and improving survival rates.
Conclusions: PCa remains a critical health issue in Italy. The reduction in ASMR and ASDR indicates progress in early diagnosis and treatment. However, subnational disparities in incidence and mortality highlight the need for targeted healthcare interventions.
{"title":"The national and subnational burden of prostate cancer in Italy from 1990 to 2021: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.","authors":"Elisa Fabbro, Giulia Zamagni, Giulia Carreras, Luca Falzone, Silvano Gallus, Giuseppe Gorini, Paolo Lauriola, Carlo LA Vecchia, Caterina Ledda, Andrea Maugeri, Giuseppe Minervini, Mohsen Naghavi, Goran L Omer, Mario V Papa, Simone Perna, Lorenzo Monasta, Roberto Passera","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06400-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06400-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most prevalent cancer globally and a major cause of disability and mortality. Survival rates heavily depend on the stage at which the disease is diagnosed, with substantial geographical variations in the burden of the disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021 provides detailed national and subnational estimates for the burden of PCa in Italy. This study reports incident cases and age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), deaths and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR), disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and age-standardized DALYs rates (ASDR), as well as the average annual rate of change (ARC). The PCa-related survival is investigated using the mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) for 1990 and 2021. Italian estimates were compared with Global and High-middle Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GBD 2021 estimated 39,016 new PCa cases, 10,662 deaths, and 173,048 DALYs for Italy in 2021. The average ARC for ASIR was 0.14, while the average ARC for ASMR and ASDR were -0.29 and -0.31, respectively. MIR dropped from 38.0 in 1990 to 23.8 in 2021. At the subnational level, ASIR increased in seven regions, with no regions showing a decrease, while ASMR and ASDR fell significantly in 17 regions. Italy outperformed both global and high-middle SDI countries in reducing PCa mortality and improving survival rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCa remains a critical health issue in Italy. The reduction in ASMR and ASDR indicates progress in early diagnosis and treatment. However, subnational disparities in incidence and mortality highlight the need for targeted healthcare interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"629-638"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06561-9
Umberto Anceschi, Daniele Amparore, Francesco Prata, Rocco S Flammia, Eugenio Bologna, Aldo Brassetti, Leslie C Licari, Flavia Proietti, Alfredo M Bove, Gabriele Tuderti, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Riccardo Mastroianni, Salvatore Guaglianone, Mariavittoria Vescovo, Rocco Papalia, Cristian Fiori, Costantino Leonardo, Francesco Porpiglia, Giuseppe Simone
Background: In the evolving landscape of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), the role of minimally invasive redo partial nephrectomy (rMIPN) for solitary renal cancer recurrence (RCR) remains debated, particularly considering its technical demands and perioperative risks. In this dual-institutional study, we aimed to investigate long-term perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of rMIPN, comparing off- versus on-clamp hilar strategies.
Methods: Two prospectively maintained renal cancer databases were queried for patients undergoing rMIPN for ipsilateral solitary RCR between January 2004 and October 2024. Sixty-three patients were included and stratified by hilar control: off-clamp (Group A, N.=41) versus on-clamp (Group B, N.=22). Baseline, surgical, pathological, and renal functional outcomes were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression to CKD stage ≥3b.
Results: Baseline and perioperative characteristics were comparable between groups (all P>0.01). Overall complication rates were 19.5% and 22.7% (P=0.12), respectively; major complications occurred in 4.9% and 9.1% (P=0.6). Group A exhibited more advanced tumor stage at index NSS (P=0.001). Clear cell renal cell carcinoma predominated in Group B (P<0.001). At a median follow-up of 51 months, OS, CSS, and renal function endpoints were similar (all P>0.3).
Conclusions: Hilar control technique did not significantly influence outcomes following rMIPN. Within the demanding scenario of solitary ipsilateral recurrence, surgical judgment and tailored planning remain essential to preserve function while maintaining oncologic safety at long-term follow-up.
{"title":"Off- versus on-clamp minimally invasive redo partial nephrectomy for solitary renal cancer recurrence: a dual-institutional exploration of surgical safety and long-term outcomes.","authors":"Umberto Anceschi, Daniele Amparore, Francesco Prata, Rocco S Flammia, Eugenio Bologna, Aldo Brassetti, Leslie C Licari, Flavia Proietti, Alfredo M Bove, Gabriele Tuderti, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Riccardo Mastroianni, Salvatore Guaglianone, Mariavittoria Vescovo, Rocco Papalia, Cristian Fiori, Costantino Leonardo, Francesco Porpiglia, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06561-9","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06561-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the evolving landscape of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), the role of minimally invasive redo partial nephrectomy (rMIPN) for solitary renal cancer recurrence (RCR) remains debated, particularly considering its technical demands and perioperative risks. In this dual-institutional study, we aimed to investigate long-term perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of rMIPN, comparing off- versus on-clamp hilar strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two prospectively maintained renal cancer databases were queried for patients undergoing rMIPN for ipsilateral solitary RCR between January 2004 and October 2024. Sixty-three patients were included and stratified by hilar control: off-clamp (Group A, N.=41) versus on-clamp (Group B, N.=22). Baseline, surgical, pathological, and renal functional outcomes were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression to CKD stage ≥3b.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline and perioperative characteristics were comparable between groups (all P>0.01). Overall complication rates were 19.5% and 22.7% (P=0.12), respectively; major complications occurred in 4.9% and 9.1% (P=0.6). Group A exhibited more advanced tumor stage at index NSS (P=0.001). Clear cell renal cell carcinoma predominated in Group B (P<0.001). At a median follow-up of 51 months, OS, CSS, and renal function endpoints were similar (all P>0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hilar control technique did not significantly influence outcomes following rMIPN. Within the demanding scenario of solitary ipsilateral recurrence, surgical judgment and tailored planning remain essential to preserve function while maintaining oncologic safety at long-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"647-654"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06707-2
Selcuk Erdem, Murat Sari, Laura Marandino, Ronan Flippot, Daniele Amparore, Riccardo Campi
{"title":"YAU-RCC spotlight: dual VEGF/EGFR blockade shows promise for reshaping the treatment of papillary RCC in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer syndrome.","authors":"Selcuk Erdem, Murat Sari, Laura Marandino, Ronan Flippot, Daniele Amparore, Riccardo Campi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06707-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06707-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"587-591"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145350013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06577-2
Andrea Piccolini, Marco Paciotti, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Vittorio Fasulo, Pier P Avolio, Gianluigi Taverna, Angelo Porreca, Omid Sedigh, Sabato Barra, Mauro Seveso, Paolo Casale, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò M Buffi
{"title":"Shaping urologic training in Italy: insights from a young academic residency program.","authors":"Andrea Piccolini, Marco Paciotti, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Vittorio Fasulo, Pier P Avolio, Gianluigi Taverna, Angelo Porreca, Omid Sedigh, Sabato Barra, Mauro Seveso, Paolo Casale, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò M Buffi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06577-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06577-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"737-739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06595-4
Giuseppe Pallotta, Maria C Sighinolfi, Francesco Pinto, Mauro Ragonese, Simona Presutti, Antonio Cretì, Antonio Silvestri, Annarita Scrofani, Pierluigi Russo, Filippo Gavi, Bernardo C Rocco, Roberto Iezzi
{"title":"Identifying the best candidates to prostatic artery embolization: indications and best practice across guidelines.","authors":"Giuseppe Pallotta, Maria C Sighinolfi, Francesco Pinto, Mauro Ragonese, Simona Presutti, Antonio Cretì, Antonio Silvestri, Annarita Scrofani, Pierluigi Russo, Filippo Gavi, Bernardo C Rocco, Roberto Iezzi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06595-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06595-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"576-579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06714-X
Fabrizio Dinacci, Lorenzo Spirito, Ugo Amicuzi, Federico Capone, Raffaele Balsamo
{"title":"Comment on: \"Impact of minimally invasive surgical therapies on sexual function in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review\".","authors":"Fabrizio Dinacci, Lorenzo Spirito, Ugo Amicuzi, Federico Capone, Raffaele Balsamo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06714-X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06714-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"727-729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06705-9
Roberto Miano, Giovanni Gambaro, Corrado Vitale, Giuseppe Vezzoli, Michele Talso, Stefania Ferretti, Michele Raguso, Pietro M Ferraro
This article was published in Volume 77, issue 1 of publishing year 2025, with a mistake in the "Conflicts of interest", "Funding" and "Acknowledgements" sections. The correct sections are the ones included in this erratum.
{"title":"Correction to: Management of genetically determined kidney stone disease: consensus from a panel of urologists and nephrologists.","authors":"Roberto Miano, Giovanni Gambaro, Corrado Vitale, Giuseppe Vezzoli, Michele Talso, Stefania Ferretti, Michele Raguso, Pietro M Ferraro","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06705-9","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06705-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article was published in Volume 77, issue 1 of publishing year 2025, with a mistake in the \"Conflicts of interest\", \"Funding\" and \"Acknowledgements\" sections. The correct sections are the ones included in this erratum.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 5","pages":"742"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145349912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Treatment of anemia is one of the main goals of supportive care in patients on hemodialysis. In this context, the use of therapy with hypoxia inducible factor inhibitors (HIF-PHI) represents a further promising resource. The main objective is to evaluate the difference in hemoglobin levels after treatment with HIF-PHI compared to placebo/ESA.
Evidence acquisition: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), looking for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies considered hemodialysis patients older than 18 years with the diagnosis of anemia treated with HIF-PHIs. Protocol was previously published on PROSPERO (CRD42024589848).
Evidence synthesis: Among a total of 126 references, 32 citations were selected by screening of titles and abstracts, for full-text evaluation, and 14 articles referring were included in the review after the screening for full-text articles. Data on hemoglobin differences were reported by all studies and the pooled analysis involving 3890 patients (2267 in the experimental group and 1623 in the control group), network metanalysis did not show significant differences in Delta Hemoglobin among any HIF-PHIs types and ESA/placebo. Similarly, no significant differences were found comparing HIF-PHIs to ESA Splitting (11 studies, N.=3611). However, a significant difference was found comparing HIF-PHIs to Placebo (MD=1.48, 95%CI: 1.15/1.81, P<0.001). The experimental and control groups differed for gastrointestinal adverse events, whereas there were no differences for any other adverse events.
Conclusions: The similar efficiency and safety between HIF-PHIs and ESA care could modify the usual clinical treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients, and allow personalized therapy.
治疗贫血是血液透析患者支持治疗的主要目标之一。在这种情况下,使用缺氧诱导因子抑制剂(HIF-PHI)治疗是一个进一步有前途的资源。主要目的是评估HIF-PHI治疗后与安慰剂/ESA治疗后血红蛋白水平的差异。证据获取:我们在PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE和Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)中进行了系统搜索,寻找随机对照试验(RCTs)。符合条件的研究考虑了18岁以上诊断为贫血的血液透析患者用HIF-PHIs治疗。协议先前在PROSPERO (CRD42024589848)上发布。证据综合:在126篇文献中,通过题目和摘要筛选筛选出32篇文献进行全文评价,经全文筛选后纳入14篇文献。所有研究都报告了血红蛋白差异的数据,并对3890例患者进行了汇总分析(实验组2267例,对照组1623例),网络荟萃分析未显示任何HIF-PHIs类型与ESA/安慰剂之间的δ血红蛋白差异有显著性差异。同样,将HIF-PHIs与ESA Splitting进行比较也没有发现显著差异(11项研究,n =3611)。HIF-PHIs与安慰剂比较差异有统计学意义(MD=1.48, 95%CI: 1.15/1.81)。结论:HIF-PHIs与ESA护理的有效性和安全性相似,可以改变血透析患者贫血的常规临床治疗方法,实现个性化治疗。
{"title":"Differences in efficacy and safety between HIF-PHIS and ESA/placebo in a sample of hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Valeria Cernaro, Veronica Maressa, Guido Gembillo, Giulio Geraci, Chiara Casuscelli, Cristina Rossano, Domenico Santoro, Vincenzo Calabrese","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06243-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06243-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment of anemia is one of the main goals of supportive care in patients on hemodialysis. In this context, the use of therapy with hypoxia inducible factor inhibitors (HIF-PHI) represents a further promising resource. The main objective is to evaluate the difference in hemoglobin levels after treatment with HIF-PHI compared to placebo/ESA.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We performed a systematic search in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), looking for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies considered hemodialysis patients older than 18 years with the diagnosis of anemia treated with HIF-PHIs. Protocol was previously published on PROSPERO (CRD42024589848).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Among a total of 126 references, 32 citations were selected by screening of titles and abstracts, for full-text evaluation, and 14 articles referring were included in the review after the screening for full-text articles. Data on hemoglobin differences were reported by all studies and the pooled analysis involving 3890 patients (2267 in the experimental group and 1623 in the control group), network metanalysis did not show significant differences in Delta Hemoglobin among any HIF-PHIs types and ESA/placebo. Similarly, no significant differences were found comparing HIF-PHIs to ESA Splitting (11 studies, N.=3611). However, a significant difference was found comparing HIF-PHIs to Placebo (MD=1.48, 95%CI: 1.15/1.81, P<0.001). The experimental and control groups differed for gastrointestinal adverse events, whereas there were no differences for any other adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The similar efficiency and safety between HIF-PHIs and ESA care could modify the usual clinical treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients, and allow personalized therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145034341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}