首页 > 最新文献

Minerva Urology and Nephrology最新文献

英文 中文
Unmet needs in the management of patients with bilateral synchronous renal masses: the rationale for clinical decision-making. 双侧同步肾肿块患者管理中未满足的需求:临床决策的依据。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05894-4
Pietro Diana, Daniele Amparore, Riccardo Bertolo, Umberto Capitanio, Selcuk Erdem, Onder Kara, Tobias Klatte, Maximilian C Kriegmair, Carme Mir, Eduard Roussel, Riccardo Campi

Background: Bilateral synchronous renal masses (BSRMs) are a rare finding, and the optimal treatment strategy remains undetermined. This study depicts the management of BSRM at eight European high-volume centers.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospective institutional databases collecting all patients presenting with clinical T1-2 N0 M0 BSRMs between 1993 and 2020 at 8 tertiary referral high-volume centers for renal cancer treatment in Europe. The treatment options included active surveillance (AS), tumor ablation (TA) and surgery (partial and radical nephrectomy).

Results: Overall, 134 patients were analyzed. Renal mass biopsy prior treatment was performed in 8% of cases. 15%, 4%, and 81% of patients underwent AS, a combination of surgery and TA, and bilateral (one-stage or two-stage) surgery. Among patients undergoing bilateral surgery (N.=109), a staged approach was chosen in 78% (N.=85) of cases treating the lower complexity tumor first in 51/85 (60%) cases and in 34/85 (40%) treating the higher complexity tumor first. Concordance of the histological analysis was found in 77% of patients with 10% of bilateral benign masses.

Conclusions: Even if considering only referral centers, a high heterogeneity for decision-making in the treatment of BSRM should be expected. Advances in genetic diagnosis, the implementation of novel imaging technologies, and the strengthening role of alternative treatment, may lead to a standardized decision-making process in the setting of BSRMs.

背景:双侧同步性肾肿块(BSRMs)是一种罕见的发现,最佳治疗策略仍未确定。本研究描述了八个欧洲高容量中心的BSRM管理。方法:这是一项前瞻性机构数据库的回顾性分析,该数据库收集了1993年至2020年间在欧洲8个三级转诊大容量肾癌治疗中心出现临床T1-2 N0 M0 BSRMs的所有患者。治疗方案包括主动监测(AS)、肿瘤消融(TA)和手术(部分和根治性肾切除术)。结果:总共分析了134例患者。8%的病例在治疗前进行了肾肿块活检。15%、4%和81%的患者接受了AS、手术和TA联合手术以及双侧(一期或两期)手术。在109例双侧手术患者中,51/85例(60%)的低复杂性肿瘤患者中有78%(85例)选择分期入路,34/85例(40%)的高复杂性肿瘤患者选择分期入路。77%的双侧良性肿块患者的组织学分析一致。结论:即使只考虑转诊中心,BSRM治疗决策的高度异质性应该是可以预期的。遗传诊断的进步、新型成像技术的应用以及替代治疗的作用的增强,可能会导致bsrm设置的标准化决策过程。
{"title":"Unmet needs in the management of patients with bilateral synchronous renal masses: the rationale for clinical decision-making.","authors":"Pietro Diana, Daniele Amparore, Riccardo Bertolo, Umberto Capitanio, Selcuk Erdem, Onder Kara, Tobias Klatte, Maximilian C Kriegmair, Carme Mir, Eduard Roussel, Riccardo Campi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05894-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05894-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bilateral synchronous renal masses (BSRMs) are a rare finding, and the optimal treatment strategy remains undetermined. This study depicts the management of BSRM at eight European high-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of prospective institutional databases collecting all patients presenting with clinical T1-2 N0 M0 BSRMs between 1993 and 2020 at 8 tertiary referral high-volume centers for renal cancer treatment in Europe. The treatment options included active surveillance (AS), tumor ablation (TA) and surgery (partial and radical nephrectomy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 134 patients were analyzed. Renal mass biopsy prior treatment was performed in 8% of cases. 15%, 4%, and 81% of patients underwent AS, a combination of surgery and TA, and bilateral (one-stage or two-stage) surgery. Among patients undergoing bilateral surgery (N.=109), a staged approach was chosen in 78% (N.=85) of cases treating the lower complexity tumor first in 51/85 (60%) cases and in 34/85 (40%) treating the higher complexity tumor first. Concordance of the histological analysis was found in 77% of patients with 10% of bilateral benign masses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even if considering only referral centers, a high heterogeneity for decision-making in the treatment of BSRM should be expected. Advances in genetic diagnosis, the implementation of novel imaging technologies, and the strengthening role of alternative treatment, may lead to a standardized decision-making process in the setting of BSRMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"691-697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ejaculation preservation in BPH: a question of size? BPH的射精保存:大小的问题?
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06269-4
Marco Finati, Luca Cindolo, Gian Maria Busetto, Davide Arcaniolo, Sisto Perdonà, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Alessandro Veccia, Achille Aveta, Riccardo Autorino, Savio D Pandolfo
{"title":"Ejaculation preservation in BPH: a question of size?","authors":"Marco Finati, Luca Cindolo, Gian Maria Busetto, Davide Arcaniolo, Sisto Perdonà, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Alessandro Veccia, Achille Aveta, Riccardo Autorino, Savio D Pandolfo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06269-4","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06269-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"794-796"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. robotic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones: an inverse probability treatment weighting analysis. 大肾结石的经皮肾镜取石术与机器人肾盂取石术:反概率治疗权重分析。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06074-9
Stefano Moretto, Michele Zazzara, Filippo Marino, Mauro Ragonese, Marcello Scarcia, Ugo Gradilone, Pierluigi Russo, Marco Montesi, Nicolò Lentini, Roberta Pastorino, Giuseppe M Ludovico, Francesco Pinto

Background: The American Urologic Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines endorse percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for symptomatic stones larger than 20 mm despite significant risks such as bleeding and urosepsis. Robotic pyelolithotomy (RPL) is emerging as an appealing alternative to PCNL, particularly for patients with anatomical variations like pelvic or horseshoe kidneys, malrotation, previous unsuccessful PCNL, and congenital renal anomalies such as ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted involving patients from Miulli Hospital and A. Gemelli University Hospital between February 2016 and December 2023. Adults with large renal stones, including both pelvic and caliceal stones, who underwent either RPL or PCNL were included. The primary outcome was the Stone-Free Rate (SFR) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, delta hemoglobin, delta creatinine, hospital stay length, and complications. This study compares the effectiveness and outcomes of PCNL and RPL using Propensity Score-Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (PS-IPTW) analysis.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the 12-month SFR between RPL and PCNL, both in the calyceal-pelvic (73.6% vs. 70.6%; P=0.722) and pelvic groups (91% vs. 91.7%; P=1). Complication rates were also similar between RPL and PCNL in both the calyceal-pelvic (15.4% vs. 14.3%; P=0.856) and renal pelvic groups (27.3% vs. 10.8%; P=0.225, with Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3 complications in 9% vs. 8.9% and 4.4% vs. 0%, respectively. RPL showed significant advantages in operation time in the pyelocaliceal (P<0.001) and pelvic groups (P=0.006), delta creatinine (P=0.018) in the pyelocaliceal group, and hospital stay length in the pelvic group (P=0.011).

Conclusions: RPL demonstrated similar success and complication rates compared to PCNL, with significantly lower intraoperative time, delta creatinine rate, and hospital stay length. RPL is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment option, particularly valuable for large renal stones in patients with complex anatomy and those requiring concomitant renal reconstructive procedures.

背景:美国泌尿学协会(AUA)和欧洲泌尿学协会(EAU)指南支持经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)治疗大于20mm的症状性结石,尽管存在出血和尿脓毒症等显著风险。机器人肾盂取石术(RPL)正在成为PCNL的一个有吸引力的替代方案,特别是对于解剖变异的患者,如骨盆或马蹄肾,旋转不良,以前不成功的PCNL,以及先天性肾脏异常,如输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻(UPJO)。方法:对2016年2月至2023年12月Miulli医院和A. Gemelli大学医院的患者进行回顾性观察研究。包括盆腔结石和肾盏结石在内的大肾结石患者接受了RPL或PCNL。主要观察指标为12个月无结石率(SFR)。次要结局包括手术时间、估计失血量、血红蛋白、肌酐、住院时间和并发症。本研究采用倾向得分-逆概率处理加权(PS-IPTW)分析比较了PCNL和RPL的有效性和结果。结果:RPL和PCNL在12个月的SFR方面无统计学差异,无论是在肾盏-盆腔(73.6% vs 70.6%;P=0.722)和盆腔组(91% vs. 91.7%;P = 1)。RPL和PCNL在肾盏-盆腔的并发症发生率也相似(15.4% vs 14.3%;P=0.856)和肾盆腔组(27.3% vs. 10.8%;P=0.225, Clavien-Dindo分级≥3级并发症发生率分别为9%比8.9%和4.4%比0%。结论:与PCNL相比,RPL的手术成功率和并发症发生率相似,术中时间、三角肌酐率和住院时间均显著缩短。RPL是一种安全、有效、微创的治疗选择,对于解剖结构复杂的大肾结石患者和需要同时进行肾脏重建手术的患者尤其有价值。
{"title":"Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. robotic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones: an inverse probability treatment weighting analysis.","authors":"Stefano Moretto, Michele Zazzara, Filippo Marino, Mauro Ragonese, Marcello Scarcia, Ugo Gradilone, Pierluigi Russo, Marco Montesi, Nicolò Lentini, Roberta Pastorino, Giuseppe M Ludovico, Francesco Pinto","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06074-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06074-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American Urologic Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines endorse percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for symptomatic stones larger than 20 mm despite significant risks such as bleeding and urosepsis. Robotic pyelolithotomy (RPL) is emerging as an appealing alternative to PCNL, particularly for patients with anatomical variations like pelvic or horseshoe kidneys, malrotation, previous unsuccessful PCNL, and congenital renal anomalies such as ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted involving patients from Miulli Hospital and A. Gemelli University Hospital between February 2016 and December 2023. Adults with large renal stones, including both pelvic and caliceal stones, who underwent either RPL or PCNL were included. The primary outcome was the Stone-Free Rate (SFR) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, delta hemoglobin, delta creatinine, hospital stay length, and complications. This study compares the effectiveness and outcomes of PCNL and RPL using Propensity Score-Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (PS-IPTW) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found in the 12-month SFR between RPL and PCNL, both in the calyceal-pelvic (73.6% vs. 70.6%; P=0.722) and pelvic groups (91% vs. 91.7%; P=1). Complication rates were also similar between RPL and PCNL in both the calyceal-pelvic (15.4% vs. 14.3%; P=0.856) and renal pelvic groups (27.3% vs. 10.8%; P=0.225, with Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3 complications in 9% vs. 8.9% and 4.4% vs. 0%, respectively. RPL showed significant advantages in operation time in the pyelocaliceal (P<0.001) and pelvic groups (P=0.006), delta creatinine (P=0.018) in the pyelocaliceal group, and hospital stay length in the pelvic group (P=0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPL demonstrated similar success and complication rates compared to PCNL, with significantly lower intraoperative time, delta creatinine rate, and hospital stay length. RPL is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment option, particularly valuable for large renal stones in patients with complex anatomy and those requiring concomitant renal reconstructive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"726-735"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What conclusions can (and cannot) be drawn three years after transperineal laser ablation of prostate? 经会阴前列腺激光消融术三年后可以(和不能)得出什么结论?
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06008-7
Paolo Minafra, Gaetano DE Rienzo, Pasquale Ditonno
{"title":"What conclusions can (and cannot) be drawn three years after transperineal laser ablation of prostate?","authors":"Paolo Minafra, Gaetano DE Rienzo, Pasquale Ditonno","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06008-7","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06008-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"804-805"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The evolving landscape of urological practice: beyond distances. 泌尿外科实践的发展前景:超越距离。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06266-9
Ahmed Eissa, Ahmed Zoeir, Moaz Abdelrahman, Ahmed M Bakr, Atinç Tozsin, Aly M Abdel-Karim, Stefano Puliatti
{"title":"The evolving landscape of urological practice: beyond distances.","authors":"Ahmed Eissa, Ahmed Zoeir, Moaz Abdelrahman, Ahmed M Bakr, Atinç Tozsin, Aly M Abdel-Karim, Stefano Puliatti","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06266-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06266-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"802-804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transperitoneal versus low anterior access single-port pyeloplasty: surgical and functional outcomes from a tertiary referral center. 经腹膜与低前路单孔肾盂成形术:来自三级转诊中心的手术和功能结果。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06065-8
Matteo Pacini, Luca Lambertini, Donato Cannoletta, Greta Pettenuzzo, Luca Morgantini, Gabriele Bignante, Giulio Avesani, Juan R Torres Anguiano, Ruben C Sauer, Alessandro Zucchi, Simone Crivellaro

Background: Transperitoneal approach to robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) have been preferred in the last decades because of the use of multi-port robotic platforms. However, this approach is linked to notable issues, such as pneumoperitoneum and lateral decubitus position, which is associated with potential soft tissues injuries, and it is a time-consuming procedure. Single-port (SP) platform was introduced to potentially address these issues. Our aim was to describe perioperative surgical and functional outcomes of SP-RAP, including our preliminary results comparing the transperitoneal and LAA approaches.

Methods: Data from a prospectively maintained dataset of all consecutive patients undergoing SP-RAP between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Early procedures were performed using transperitoneal midline access, while later procedures utilized the low anterior access (LAA) approach. Patients' demographics, perioperative data, and surgical and functional outcomes were collected.

Results: Overall, 34 patients underwent the procedure without intraoperative complications or conversion to an alternative approach. The median age was 46.5 (range: 35-56) years. The transperitoneal approach was used for the first 17 (50%) procedures, while the remaining 17 (50%) underwent LAA SP-RAP. Nonoperative room time, postoperative opioid dose, and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the LAA group (P<0.001 in all cases), with all patients in the LAA group being discharged on the same day. No differences were observed in operative time or postoperative renal function.

Conclusions: Outcomes for SP pyeloplasties appear promising, and the LAA approach may help optimize operating room time, promote faster patient recovery, and reduce postoperative opioid use.

背景:在过去的几十年里,由于多端口机器人平台的使用,经腹膜入路机器人辅助肾盂成形术(RAP)已经成为首选。然而,这种方法有一些值得注意的问题,如气腹和侧卧位,这与潜在的软组织损伤有关,并且是一个耗时的过程。引入单端口(SP)平台可能会解决这些问题。我们的目的是描述SP-RAP的围手术期手术和功能结果,包括我们比较经腹膜和LAA入路的初步结果。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2024年间所有连续接受SP-RAP患者的前瞻性维护数据集的数据。早期手术采用经腹膜中线入路,而后期手术采用低前路(LAA)入路。收集患者的人口统计学、围手术期数据以及手术和功能结果。结果:总体而言,34例患者接受了手术,无术中并发症或转换为其他入路。中位年龄为46.5岁(范围:35-56岁)。前17例(50%)采用经腹膜入路,其余17例(50%)采用LAA SP-RAP。LAA组非手术时间、术后阿片类药物剂量和住院时间均显著低于对照组(p结论:SP肾盂成形术的预后良好,LAA方法有助于优化手术时间,促进患者更快康复,减少术后阿片类药物的使用。
{"title":"Transperitoneal versus low anterior access single-port pyeloplasty: surgical and functional outcomes from a tertiary referral center.","authors":"Matteo Pacini, Luca Lambertini, Donato Cannoletta, Greta Pettenuzzo, Luca Morgantini, Gabriele Bignante, Giulio Avesani, Juan R Torres Anguiano, Ruben C Sauer, Alessandro Zucchi, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06065-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06065-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transperitoneal approach to robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) have been preferred in the last decades because of the use of multi-port robotic platforms. However, this approach is linked to notable issues, such as pneumoperitoneum and lateral decubitus position, which is associated with potential soft tissues injuries, and it is a time-consuming procedure. Single-port (SP) platform was introduced to potentially address these issues. Our aim was to describe perioperative surgical and functional outcomes of SP-RAP, including our preliminary results comparing the transperitoneal and LAA approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a prospectively maintained dataset of all consecutive patients undergoing SP-RAP between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Early procedures were performed using transperitoneal midline access, while later procedures utilized the low anterior access (LAA) approach. Patients' demographics, perioperative data, and surgical and functional outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 34 patients underwent the procedure without intraoperative complications or conversion to an alternative approach. The median age was 46.5 (range: 35-56) years. The transperitoneal approach was used for the first 17 (50%) procedures, while the remaining 17 (50%) underwent LAA SP-RAP. Nonoperative room time, postoperative opioid dose, and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the LAA group (P<0.001 in all cases), with all patients in the LAA group being discharged on the same day. No differences were observed in operative time or postoperative renal function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outcomes for SP pyeloplasties appear promising, and the LAA approach may help optimize operating room time, promote faster patient recovery, and reduce postoperative opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"717-725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative analysis of the long-term efficacy and safety of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (>80 mL). 微创单纯前列腺切除术与内镜下前列腺核摘除术治疗大面积良性前列腺增生(> ~ 80ml)的远期疗效及安全性比较分析
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05940-8
Jia Luo, Pengjun Xu, Hui Shuai, Tao Cai, Shu Cui, Lin Zhou, Qian Xu, Yuxin Zhao, Tao Chen, Tao Wu

Introduction: Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are appropriate candidates for the large prostate. However, their comparative effectiveness and safety remain unclear. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of MISP and EEP.

Evidence acquisition: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies comparing MISP and EEP. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I and the ROB2.0 assessment tool.

Evidence synthesis: The results of analyzing 13 studies involving 2271 patients showed that EEP had significant lower operative time (MD [CI]: 41.59 [14.62-68.56]), catheterization time (MD [CI]: 4.35 [3.31-5.38]), length of stay (MD [CI]: 2.16 [0.70-3.61]), and Hb decreases (MD [CI]: 0.46 [0.06-0.87]). MISP demonstrated significantly better long-term (MD [CI]: -0.46 [-0.89; -0.03]) and short-term QoL (MD [CI]: -0.38 [-0.66; -0.10]) and short-term Qmax (MD [CI]: 2.04 [0.06-4.03]). Efficacy outcomes were comparable in postoperative IPSS, PVR and PSA between MISP and EEP procedures. No significant differences were observed in resection weight, overall complications, blood transfusions, or urinary incontinence between MISP and EEP.

Conclusions: Overall, EEP and MISP are both effective treatment options for large-volume BPH, providing comparable efficacy outcomes and long-term maintenance. EEP, on the other hand appears to have better perioperative outcomes, but it has a higher rate of short-term postoperative incontinence.

微创简单前列腺切除术(MISP)和内镜下前列腺摘除(EEP)是大前列腺的合适选择。然而,它们的相对有效性和安全性仍不清楚。本研究旨在对MISP和EEP的疗效和安全性进行综合分析比较。证据获取:我们对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定比较MISP和EEP的符合条件的研究。使用Review Manager 5.3进行数据分析。采用ROBINS-I和ROB2.0评估工具评估偏倚风险。证据综合:对2271例患者的13项研究分析结果显示,EEP显著降低了手术时间(MD [CI]: 41.59[14.62-68.56])、置管时间(MD [CI]: 4.35[3.31-5.38])、住院时间(MD [CI]: 2.16[0.70-3.61])和Hb降低(MD [CI]: 0.46[0.06-0.87])。MISP表现出更好的长期疗效(MD [CI]: -0.46 [-0.89;-0.03])和短期生活质量(MD [CI]: -0.38 [-0.66;-0.10])和短期Qmax (MD [CI]: 2.04[0.06-4.03])。MISP和EEP手术术后IPSS、PVR和PSA的疗效结果具有可比性。MISP和EEP在切除重量、总并发症、输血或尿失禁方面没有显著差异。结论:总体而言,EEP和MISP都是大容量BPH的有效治疗选择,提供相当的疗效结果和长期维持。另一方面,脑电图围手术期预后较好,但术后短期尿失禁发生率较高。
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the long-term efficacy and safety of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (>80 mL).","authors":"Jia Luo, Pengjun Xu, Hui Shuai, Tao Cai, Shu Cui, Lin Zhou, Qian Xu, Yuxin Zhao, Tao Chen, Tao Wu","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05940-8","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05940-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are appropriate candidates for the large prostate. However, their comparative effectiveness and safety remain unclear. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of MISP and EEP.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies comparing MISP and EEP. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I and the ROB2.0 assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The results of analyzing 13 studies involving 2271 patients showed that EEP had significant lower operative time (MD [CI]: 41.59 [14.62-68.56]), catheterization time (MD [CI]: 4.35 [3.31-5.38]), length of stay (MD [CI]: 2.16 [0.70-3.61]), and Hb decreases (MD [CI]: 0.46 [0.06-0.87]). MISP demonstrated significantly better long-term (MD [CI]: -0.46 [-0.89; -0.03]) and short-term QoL (MD [CI]: -0.38 [-0.66; -0.10]) and short-term Qmax (MD [CI]: 2.04 [0.06-4.03]). Efficacy outcomes were comparable in postoperative IPSS, PVR and PSA between MISP and EEP procedures. No significant differences were observed in resection weight, overall complications, blood transfusions, or urinary incontinence between MISP and EEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, EEP and MISP are both effective treatment options for large-volume BPH, providing comparable efficacy outcomes and long-term maintenance. EEP, on the other hand appears to have better perioperative outcomes, but it has a higher rate of short-term postoperative incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"674-682"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
YAU kidney transplantation spotlight: should the robotic surgery be considered the "standard of care" for living donor nephrectomy? 肾移植焦点:机器人手术是否应被视为活体供体肾切除术的“标准护理”?
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06267-0
Alberto Piana, Alicia López-Abad, Alessio Pecoraro, Thomas Prudhomme, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Hakan B Haberal, M. Irfan Dönmez, Angelo Territo
{"title":"YAU kidney transplantation spotlight: should the robotic surgery be considered the \"standard of care\" for living donor nephrectomy?","authors":"Alberto Piana, Alicia López-Abad, Alessio Pecoraro, Thomas Prudhomme, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Hakan B Haberal, M. Irfan Dönmez, Angelo Territo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06267-0","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06267-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"782-784"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of multiple tumors: a multicenter analysis. 多发性肿瘤的机器人辅助肾部分切除术:多中心分析。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05816-6
Pouriya Faraj Tabrizi, Philip Zeuschner, Olga Katzendorn, Frank Schiefelbein, Andreas Schneller, Georg Schoen, Burkhard Ubrig, Simon Gloger, Clemens G Wiesinger, Jacob Pfuner, Eva Falkensammer, Ahmed Eraky, Daniar Osmonov, Philipp Nuhn, Volker Zimmermanns, Ionna Paramythelli, Boris A Hadaschik, Jan P Radtke, Christopher Darr, Nils Gilbert, Maximilian Kriegmair, Christian Fuhrmann, Markus A Kuczyk, Nina N Harke

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly performed in challenging tumor constellations like multiple renal masses.

Methods: The objective was to investigate influencing factors on postoperative renal function (PRF) after ipsilateral robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of multiple tumors (iRAPN-MT). In this retrospective multicenter study, perioperative data of 132 trans- or retroperitoneal iRAPN-MT for ≥ two tumors were analyzed focusing on influencing factors on PRF and acute kidney injury including RIFLE and trifecta criteria. The impact of patient-, surgery- and tumor-related factors was investigated via uni- and multivariate regression analyses.

Results: The majority of patients had two renal masses, with three or more lesions in 19%. Median operative time was 175 minutes. Eighty-five percent of the tumors were dissected on-clamp with a median cumulative warm ischemia time (WITsum) of 15 minutes. Trifecta criteria were fulfilled in 57%. In regression analyses, WITsum, BMI and preoperative eGFR had an impact on eGFR loss before discharge (median -11.6 mL/min). BMI and Charlson Comorbidity Index were independent predictors for the lowest RIFLE stage during hospitalization.

Conclusions: iRAPN-MT for multiple ipsilateral renal masses is feasible with good trifecta rates. While mostly unmodifiable patient-associated parameters were independent predictors on PRF impairment, WITsum was identified as a surgery-related independent parameter.

背景:机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN)越来越多地用于多发性肾肿块等具有挑战性的肿瘤组合:目的:研究同侧多发肿瘤机器人辅助肾部分切除术(iRAPN-MT)术后肾功能(PRF)的影响因素。在这项回顾性多中心研究中,分析了132例经腹腔或腹膜后iRAPN-MT治疗≥两种肿瘤的围手术期数据,重点研究了PRF和急性肾损伤的影响因素,包括RIFLE和三联标准。通过单变量和多变量回归分析研究了患者、手术和肿瘤相关因素的影响:大多数患者有两个肾肿块,19%的患者有三个或更多病灶。手术时间中位数为175分钟。85%的肿瘤在钳夹下剥离,中位累积热缺血时间(WITsum)为15分钟。57%的肿瘤符合三联标准。在回归分析中,WITsum、BMI和术前eGFR对出院前eGFR损失(中位数-11.6 mL/min)有影响。BMI和Charlson综合指数是住院期间RIFLE最低分期的独立预测因素。结论:iRAPN-MT治疗同侧多发肾肿块是可行的,三联率良好。虽然大部分不可修改的患者相关参数是 PRF 损伤的独立预测因素,但 WITsum 被确定为手术相关的独立参数。
{"title":"Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of multiple tumors: a multicenter analysis.","authors":"Pouriya Faraj Tabrizi, Philip Zeuschner, Olga Katzendorn, Frank Schiefelbein, Andreas Schneller, Georg Schoen, Burkhard Ubrig, Simon Gloger, Clemens G Wiesinger, Jacob Pfuner, Eva Falkensammer, Ahmed Eraky, Daniar Osmonov, Philipp Nuhn, Volker Zimmermanns, Ionna Paramythelli, Boris A Hadaschik, Jan P Radtke, Christopher Darr, Nils Gilbert, Maximilian Kriegmair, Christian Fuhrmann, Markus A Kuczyk, Nina N Harke","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05816-6","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05816-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly performed in challenging tumor constellations like multiple renal masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective was to investigate influencing factors on postoperative renal function (PRF) after ipsilateral robot-assisted partial nephrectomy of multiple tumors (iRAPN-MT). In this retrospective multicenter study, perioperative data of 132 trans- or retroperitoneal iRAPN-MT for ≥ two tumors were analyzed focusing on influencing factors on PRF and acute kidney injury including RIFLE and trifecta criteria. The impact of patient-, surgery- and tumor-related factors was investigated via uni- and multivariate regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of patients had two renal masses, with three or more lesions in 19%. Median operative time was 175 minutes. Eighty-five percent of the tumors were dissected on-clamp with a median cumulative warm ischemia time (WIT<inf>sum</inf>) of 15 minutes. Trifecta criteria were fulfilled in 57%. In regression analyses, WIT<inf>sum</inf>, BMI and preoperative eGFR had an impact on eGFR loss before discharge (median -11.6 mL/min). BMI and Charlson Comorbidity Index were independent predictors for the lowest RIFLE stage during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>iRAPN-MT for multiple ipsilateral renal masses is feasible with good trifecta rates. While mostly unmodifiable patient-associated parameters were independent predictors on PRF impairment, WIT<inf>sum</inf> was identified as a surgery-related independent parameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"698-707"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142741206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Δ" Delta neobladder: a novel stentless simplified totally intracorporeal robotic technique. “Δ” Delta新膀胱:一种新型无支架简化的全体内机器人技术。
IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06146-9
Rocco Papalia, Francesco Prata, Francesco Tedesco, Alberto Ragusa, Matteo Pira, Andrea Iannuzzi, Marco Fantozzi, Angelo Civitella, Barry McGUIRE, Giuseppe Simone, Roberto M Scarpa

Background: To report the first case series of RARC using a simplified technique for intracorporeal stentless neobladder formation.

Methods: From October 2022 to February 2023, 10 patients with high-risk bladder cancer underwent RARC at our Institution. RARC with extended pelvic lymph node dissection and totally intracorporeal neobladder using Hugo RAS system. Surgical steps of this novel reservoir are shown in the complementary video. Continuous data were presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) while frequencies and proportions were used to report categorical variables and compared by means of Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test, respectively. One-year outcomes were recorded.

Results: All procedures were successfully performed. Median console time for neobladder configuration was 192 min (IQR, 170-219). A decrease in median operative time was observed in the second half of the series (305 vs. 322 minutes; P=0.12). Two patients (20%) experienced a minor complication (ileus and UTI, Clavien-Dindo II). At 12-months follow-up, renal function was preserved in all patients. Overall, 12-months daytime and night-time continence rates were 80% and 60%, respectively. The limited number of cases represents the main limitation of the current study.

Conclusions: This simplified robotic assisted intracorporeal neobladder technique demonstrates a good safety profile in this series of patients. Simplifying robotic intracorporeal surgical techniques could potentially contribute to its reproducibility and popularization in the urologic community.

背景:报道首例使用简化技术进行体外无支架新膀胱形成的RARC病例系列。方法:2022年10月至2023年2月,10例高危膀胱癌患者在我院接受RARC治疗。RARC伴扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫和完全体内新膀胱使用Hugo RAS系统。这个新水库的手术步骤在补充视频中显示。连续数据以中位数和四分位间距(IQR)表示,频率和比例分别用Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验报告分类变量。记录一年的结果。结果:所有手术均顺利完成。新膀胱配置的中位控制时间为192分钟(IQR, 170-219)。在该系列的后半部分观察到中位手术时间的减少(305 vs. 322分钟;P = 0.12)。2例患者(20%)出现轻微并发症(肠梗阻和尿路感染,Clavien-Dindo II)。在12个月的随访中,所有患者的肾功能均得以保留。总体而言,12个月的白天和夜间尿失禁率分别为80%和60%。病例数量有限是本研究的主要局限性。结论:这种简化的机器人辅助体内新膀胱技术在这一系列患者中显示出良好的安全性。简化机器人体内手术技术可能有助于其在泌尿外科社区的可重复性和普及。
{"title":"\"Δ\" Delta neobladder: a novel stentless simplified totally intracorporeal robotic technique.","authors":"Rocco Papalia, Francesco Prata, Francesco Tedesco, Alberto Ragusa, Matteo Pira, Andrea Iannuzzi, Marco Fantozzi, Angelo Civitella, Barry McGUIRE, Giuseppe Simone, Roberto M Scarpa","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06146-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06146-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To report the first case series of RARC using a simplified technique for intracorporeal stentless neobladder formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2022 to February 2023, 10 patients with high-risk bladder cancer underwent RARC at our Institution. RARC with extended pelvic lymph node dissection and totally intracorporeal neobladder using Hugo RAS system. Surgical steps of this novel reservoir are shown in the complementary video. Continuous data were presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) while frequencies and proportions were used to report categorical variables and compared by means of Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test, respectively. One-year outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were successfully performed. Median console time for neobladder configuration was 192 min (IQR, 170-219). A decrease in median operative time was observed in the second half of the series (305 vs. 322 minutes; P=0.12). Two patients (20%) experienced a minor complication (ileus and UTI, Clavien-Dindo II). At 12-months follow-up, renal function was preserved in all patients. Overall, 12-months daytime and night-time continence rates were 80% and 60%, respectively. The limited number of cases represents the main limitation of the current study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This simplified robotic assisted intracorporeal neobladder technique demonstrates a good safety profile in this series of patients. Simplifying robotic intracorporeal surgical techniques could potentially contribute to its reproducibility and popularization in the urologic community.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"773-781"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1