Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06569-3
Andrea Mari, Luca Cindolo, Cristian Fiori, Luca Lambertini, Silvia Secco, Giorgio I Russo, Francesco Sessa, Andrea Cocci, Giovanni Cochetti, Roberto Castellucci, Daniele Amparore, Daniele Castellani, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Sebastiano Cimino, Antonio Galfano, Ettore Mearini, Andrea B Galosi, Sergio Serni, Francesco Porpiglia, Andrea Salonia, Vincenzo Ficarra, Giuseppe Carrieri, Vincenzo Mirone, Andrea Minervini
Background: Minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are increasingly adopted due to fewer complications and better preservation of ejaculatory function. However, real-world data on patient selection and clinical application in Italy remain scarce.
Methods: Patients undergoing Aquablation, Rezum, iTIND, TPLA, or PUL from October 2022 to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled by 15 Italian centers in the SIU Research Network. Baseline clinical, anatomical, and functional data were collected via a secure digital platform. Data were recorded using standardized electronic case report forms, and patient-reported outcomes were gathered through validated questionnaires administered at baseline and during follow-up.
Results: A total of 312 patients were enrolled: 30 (9.6%) Aquablation, 97 (31.1%) Rezum, 49 (15.7%) iTIND, 108 (34.6%) TPLA, and 28 (9.0%) PUL. iTIND patients were the youngest (median age 47, IQR 42-57), had the lowest prostate volume (30 mL, IQR 27.5-40), lowest comorbidity scores, and poorest Qmax (6.2 mL/s, IQR 5-8). Aquablation and TPLA were adopted for larger prostates (70 mL, IQR 50-80 and 67 mL, IQR 45-85, respectively). Median lobe was most frequent in Rezum (56.7%) patients. PUL patients had the lowest post-void residual (20 mL, IQR 5-60). Rezum and TPLA patients reported better ejaculatory function (P<0.02), while iTIND patients showed the highest dysfunction (P<0.05). Baseline QoL scores were comparable across groups.
Conclusions: This interim analysis shows that MIST adoption in Italy is influenced by prostate size, age, comorbidities, and functional profiles. The findings describe baseline selection patterns only, with postoperative outcomes to be reported in future analyses.
{"title":"Trends for ejaculatory sparing and minimally invasive surgical treatments adoption for lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH in Italy: screenshot from the Italian society of urology (SIU) benign research network.","authors":"Andrea Mari, Luca Cindolo, Cristian Fiori, Luca Lambertini, Silvia Secco, Giorgio I Russo, Francesco Sessa, Andrea Cocci, Giovanni Cochetti, Roberto Castellucci, Daniele Amparore, Daniele Castellani, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Sebastiano Cimino, Antonio Galfano, Ettore Mearini, Andrea B Galosi, Sergio Serni, Francesco Porpiglia, Andrea Salonia, Vincenzo Ficarra, Giuseppe Carrieri, Vincenzo Mirone, Andrea Minervini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06569-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06569-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are increasingly adopted due to fewer complications and better preservation of ejaculatory function. However, real-world data on patient selection and clinical application in Italy remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing Aquablation, Rezum, iTIND, TPLA, or PUL from October 2022 to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled by 15 Italian centers in the SIU Research Network. Baseline clinical, anatomical, and functional data were collected via a secure digital platform. Data were recorded using standardized electronic case report forms, and patient-reported outcomes were gathered through validated questionnaires administered at baseline and during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 312 patients were enrolled: 30 (9.6%) Aquablation, 97 (31.1%) Rezum, 49 (15.7%) iTIND, 108 (34.6%) TPLA, and 28 (9.0%) PUL. iTIND patients were the youngest (median age 47, IQR 42-57), had the lowest prostate volume (30 mL, IQR 27.5-40), lowest comorbidity scores, and poorest Qmax (6.2 mL/s, IQR 5-8). Aquablation and TPLA were adopted for larger prostates (70 mL, IQR 50-80 and 67 mL, IQR 45-85, respectively). Median lobe was most frequent in Rezum (56.7%) patients. PUL patients had the lowest post-void residual (20 mL, IQR 5-60). Rezum and TPLA patients reported better ejaculatory function (P<0.02), while iTIND patients showed the highest dysfunction (P<0.05). Baseline QoL scores were comparable across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This interim analysis shows that MIST adoption in Italy is influenced by prostate size, age, comorbidities, and functional profiles. The findings describe baseline selection patterns only, with postoperative outcomes to be reported in future analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06559-0
Francesco DI Bello, Andrea Gallioli, Alessio Pecoraro, Thomas Prudhomme, Alberto Piana, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Hakan B Haberal, Muhammet I Dönmez, Alicia Lopez-Abad, Donato Cannoletta, Stefano Mancon, Lluis Guirado, Carma Facundo, Andres K Kanashiro, Pavel Gavrilov, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Josep M Gaya, Alberto Breda, Angelo Territo
Introduction: Gradient-boosting (GB) algorithm is considered as the state-of-the-art algorithm for prediction of survival. The aim of the current study was consolidating the evidence on GB machine-learning (ML) model to predict graft survival (GS) after kidney transplant (KT).
Evidence acquisition: A systematic search (PROSPERO: CRD42025645353) with a qualitative analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Prediction-model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).
Evidence synthesis: Overall, 15 studies involving 889,657 patients were included in the final analysis. Of those, 14,334 included GS information. According to ML algorithm, 12 (80.3%) studies relied on eXtremeGB, two (13.3%) on StochasticGB and one (6.4%) on lightGB. The model performance was evaluated with Area Under Curve (AUC) methodology in 12 (80%) of papers and ranged from 0.715 to 0.989. The Brier-score was evaluated in five (33.3%) papers and ranged from 0.020 to 0.14. The C-index and/or Accuracy were evaluated in three (20%) papers and ranged, in respectively, from 0.635 to 0.837, and from 0.81 to 0.979.
Conclusions: The current systematic review showed a promising potential role of GB in the GS prediction after KT. However, ML models should be carefully interpreted before being used in clinical practice.
{"title":"The role of artificial intelligence in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: a systematic review.","authors":"Francesco DI Bello, Andrea Gallioli, Alessio Pecoraro, Thomas Prudhomme, Alberto Piana, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Hakan B Haberal, Muhammet I Dönmez, Alicia Lopez-Abad, Donato Cannoletta, Stefano Mancon, Lluis Guirado, Carma Facundo, Andres K Kanashiro, Pavel Gavrilov, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Josep M Gaya, Alberto Breda, Angelo Territo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06559-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06559-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gradient-boosting (GB) algorithm is considered as the state-of-the-art algorithm for prediction of survival. The aim of the current study was consolidating the evidence on GB machine-learning (ML) model to predict graft survival (GS) after kidney transplant (KT).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search (PROSPERO: CRD42025645353) with a qualitative analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Prediction-model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, 15 studies involving 889,657 patients were included in the final analysis. Of those, 14,334 included GS information. According to ML algorithm, 12 (80.3%) studies relied on eXtremeGB, two (13.3%) on StochasticGB and one (6.4%) on lightGB. The model performance was evaluated with Area Under Curve (AUC) methodology in 12 (80%) of papers and ranged from 0.715 to 0.989. The Brier-score was evaluated in five (33.3%) papers and ranged from 0.020 to 0.14. The C-index and/or Accuracy were evaluated in three (20%) papers and ranged, in respectively, from 0.635 to 0.837, and from 0.81 to 0.979.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current systematic review showed a promising potential role of GB in the GS prediction after KT. However, ML models should be carefully interpreted before being used in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is being increasingly used to treat 2-4 cm renal stones, which can be attributed to advances in flexible ureteroscopes and ureteral access sheaths (UASs). Despite the improvement and application of flexible vacuum-assisted (FV) and intelligent pressure-controlled (IPC) UASs, no studies have compared their therapeutic efficacy and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of IPC-UAS and FV-UAS in RIRS 2-4 cm renal stones.
Methods: We included 96 and 103 patients who underwent IPC-UAS and FV-UAS RIRS, respectively, for 2-4 cm renal stones. Stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups.
Results: The immediate SFR was 69.8% and 82.5% in the IPC-UAS and FV-UAS groups, respectively (P<0.05). There were no significant between-group differences in the 1-month SFR (84.4% vs. 84.5%, P>0.05). The IPC-UAS group had a shorter hospital stay (5.2±2.4 vs. 6.2±3.2 days, P=0.018) and lower cost (CNY13014.7±3240.7 vs. CNY14022.5±2301.6, P=0.012) than the FV-UAS group. There were no significant between-group differences in operative time or complications.
Conclusions: Regarding RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones, the IPC-UAS group can achieve a 1-month SFR similar to that of the FV-UAS group, with shorter hospitalization and lower cost. Additionally, the IPC-UAS is a promising device for efficient and safe RIRS, considering its intelligent pressure regulation. Our findings could inform optimal UAS selection for managing large renal calculi and demonstrate the utility of the novel IPC-UAS in improving outcomes of RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones.
{"title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of intelligent pressure-controlled versus flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath for 2-4 cm renal calculi.","authors":"Xin Huang, Leming Song, Xiaolin Deng, Hua Chen, Jiansheng Xiao, Jin Kuang, Zhiwen Wang, Xiaoling Deng, Qiliang Zhai","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05814-2","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05814-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is being increasingly used to treat 2-4 cm renal stones, which can be attributed to advances in flexible ureteroscopes and ureteral access sheaths (UASs). Despite the improvement and application of flexible vacuum-assisted (FV) and intelligent pressure-controlled (IPC) UASs, no studies have compared their therapeutic efficacy and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of IPC-UAS and FV-UAS in RIRS 2-4 cm renal stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 96 and 103 patients who underwent IPC-UAS and FV-UAS RIRS, respectively, for 2-4 cm renal stones. Stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The immediate SFR was 69.8% and 82.5% in the IPC-UAS and FV-UAS groups, respectively (P<0.05). There were no significant between-group differences in the 1-month SFR (84.4% vs. 84.5%, P>0.05). The IPC-UAS group had a shorter hospital stay (5.2±2.4 vs. 6.2±3.2 days, P=0.018) and lower cost (CNY13014.7±3240.7 vs. CNY14022.5±2301.6, P=0.012) than the FV-UAS group. There were no significant between-group differences in operative time or complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones, the IPC-UAS group can achieve a 1-month SFR similar to that of the FV-UAS group, with shorter hospitalization and lower cost. Additionally, the IPC-UAS is a promising device for efficient and safe RIRS, considering its intelligent pressure regulation. Our findings could inform optimal UAS selection for managing large renal calculi and demonstrate the utility of the novel IPC-UAS in improving outcomes of RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06832-6
Andrea Piccolini, Marco Paciotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Bartoletti, Andrea B Galosi, Carlo Bettocchi, Alberto Briganti, Eugenio Brunocilla, Antonio Carbone, Luca Carmignani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Maria A Cerruto, Sebastiano Cimino, Luigi Cormio, Luigi F DA Pozzo, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Rocco Damiano, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Marco DE Sio, Pasquale DI Tonno, Vincenzo Ficarra, Enrico Finazzi Agrò, Cristian Fiori, Giorgio Franco, Paolo Gontero, Ciro Imbimbo, Giovanni Lughezzani, Massimo Madonia, Lorenzo Masieri, Ettore Mearini, Salvatore Micali, Andrea Minervini, Emanuele Montanari, Giuseppe Maria Morgia, Gennaro Musi, Rocco Papalia, Francesco Porpiglia, Bernardo Rocco, Andrea Salonia, Riccardo Schiavina, Luigi Schips, Alessandro Sciarra, Sergio Serni, Alchiede Simonato, Carlo Terrone, Andrea Tubaro, Alessandro Volpe, Nicolò M Buffi
{"title":"Optimizing urology residency education in Italy: a national tele-lecture experience.","authors":"Andrea Piccolini, Marco Paciotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Bartoletti, Andrea B Galosi, Carlo Bettocchi, Alberto Briganti, Eugenio Brunocilla, Antonio Carbone, Luca Carmignani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Maria A Cerruto, Sebastiano Cimino, Luigi Cormio, Luigi F DA Pozzo, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Rocco Damiano, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Marco DE Sio, Pasquale DI Tonno, Vincenzo Ficarra, Enrico Finazzi Agrò, Cristian Fiori, Giorgio Franco, Paolo Gontero, Ciro Imbimbo, Giovanni Lughezzani, Massimo Madonia, Lorenzo Masieri, Ettore Mearini, Salvatore Micali, Andrea Minervini, Emanuele Montanari, Giuseppe Maria Morgia, Gennaro Musi, Rocco Papalia, Francesco Porpiglia, Bernardo Rocco, Andrea Salonia, Riccardo Schiavina, Luigi Schips, Alessandro Sciarra, Sergio Serni, Alchiede Simonato, Carlo Terrone, Andrea Tubaro, Alessandro Volpe, Nicolò M Buffi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06832-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06832-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"152-155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06658-3
Manfredi B Sequi, Antonio L Pastore, Yazan Al Salhi, Riccardo Lombardo, Fabio M Valenzi, Paolo P Suraci, Onofrio A Rera, Silvio Scalzo, Alice Antonioni, Damiano Graziani, Giorgio Martino, Giuseppe Candita, Filippo Gianfrancesco, Paolo Benanti, Luca Erra, Giovanni DI Gregorio, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Antonio Carbone, Andrea Fuschi
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have revolutionized various fields, including urology. This review examines the application of AI in managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), focusing on its potential to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and patient education.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IeeeXplore, and Cochrane databases were searched till December 2024. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies on artificial intelligence and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Data were divided into two broad categories: Large language models (LLMs) for patient education and clinical AI applications. Clinical AI applications were further divided in: biomarker identification, functional diagnostics, imaging, severity diagnosis, treatment prediction, and histological examination. Data extraction included study characteristics, data sources, model development and validation methods, handling of missing data, calibration, threshold selection, interpretability, and safeguards against data leakage. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2, PROBAST, and ROBINS-I tools.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twenty-three studies were included: four evaluated large language models (LLMs) for patient education, and 19 investigated clinical AI applications, including biomarker identification, functional evaluation, imaging, severity diagnosis, and histological examination. The LLMs studies investigated AI chatbots like ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and New Bing Chat have shown high accuracy in answering BPH-related questions, aiding patient education. Biomarker Identification: Studies utilizing ML algorithms identified key diagnostic genes and biomarkers for BPH, improving diagnostic accuracy; Functional Evaluation: AI models accurately predict urinary flow patterns and diagnose bladder dysfunctions, reducing the need for invasive procedures; Imaging: AI improves the accuracy of prostate segmentation and volume measurement, aiding better diagnosis and treatment planning; Severity Diagnosis and Treatment: AI systems provide accurate severity assessments and predict treatment outcomes, supporting clinical decision-making; Histological Examination: AI-based models demonstrate high accuracy in diagnosing BPH and predicting tissue responses to treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI has demonstrated significant promise in BPH management, offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatment strategies, and improved patient engagement. However, challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, small and institution-specific datasets, and a lack of prospective validation studies. Ethical concerns, regulatory oversight, and physician trust also need to be addressed before widespread clinical adoption. Future research should focus on refining AI models through multi-institutional collaborations,
人工智能(AI)及其子集,包括机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL),已经彻底改变了包括泌尿外科在内的各个领域。本文综述了人工智能在治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)中的应用,重点介绍了人工智能在提高诊断、治疗和患者教育方面的潜力。证据获取:检索PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IeeeXplore和Cochrane数据库至2024年12月。遵循PRISMA指南确定人工智能和良性前列腺增生的合格研究。数据分为两大类:用于患者教育的大型语言模型(llm)和临床人工智能应用。临床人工智能应用进一步分为:生物标志物鉴定、功能诊断、影像学、严重程度诊断、治疗预测和组织学检查。数据提取包括研究特征、数据源、模型开发和验证方法、缺失数据的处理、校准、阈值选择、可解释性和防止数据泄漏的保护措施。使用QUADAS-2、PROBAST和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。证据综合:纳入23项研究:4项评估用于患者教育的大型语言模型(llm), 19项调查临床人工智能应用,包括生物标志物鉴定、功能评估、成像、严重程度诊断和组织学检查。法学硕士研究调查了ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4和New Bing Chat等人工智能聊天机器人,它们在回答bph相关问题、帮助患者教育方面表现出了很高的准确性。生物标志物鉴定:利用ML算法鉴定BPH的关键诊断基因和生物标志物,提高诊断准确性的研究;功能评估:AI模型准确预测尿流模式,诊断膀胱功能障碍,减少侵入性手术的需要;成像:人工智能提高了前列腺分割和体积测量的准确性,有助于更好的诊断和治疗计划;严重程度诊断和治疗:人工智能系统提供准确的严重程度评估和预测治疗结果,支持临床决策;组织学检查:基于人工智能的模型在诊断BPH和预测组织对治疗的反应方面显示出很高的准确性。结论:人工智能在BPH管理中表现出了显著的前景,提供了更高的诊断准确性,个性化的治疗策略,并改善了患者的参与度。然而,挑战仍然存在,包括数据异质性,小型和特定机构的数据集,以及缺乏前瞻性验证研究。在广泛的临床应用之前,伦理问题、监管监督和医生信任也需要得到解决。未来的研究应侧重于通过多机构合作来完善人工智能模型,开发标准化数据集,并进行真实世界的验证研究。随着技术的不断进步,人工智能有可能彻底改变BPH的管理,最终改善患者的治疗效果和医疗效率。
{"title":"Current role of artificial intelligence in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review.","authors":"Manfredi B Sequi, Antonio L Pastore, Yazan Al Salhi, Riccardo Lombardo, Fabio M Valenzi, Paolo P Suraci, Onofrio A Rera, Silvio Scalzo, Alice Antonioni, Damiano Graziani, Giorgio Martino, Giuseppe Candita, Filippo Gianfrancesco, Paolo Benanti, Luca Erra, Giovanni DI Gregorio, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Antonio Carbone, Andrea Fuschi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06658-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06658-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have revolutionized various fields, including urology. This review examines the application of AI in managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), focusing on its potential to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and patient education.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IeeeXplore, and Cochrane databases were searched till December 2024. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies on artificial intelligence and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Data were divided into two broad categories: Large language models (LLMs) for patient education and clinical AI applications. Clinical AI applications were further divided in: biomarker identification, functional diagnostics, imaging, severity diagnosis, treatment prediction, and histological examination. Data extraction included study characteristics, data sources, model development and validation methods, handling of missing data, calibration, threshold selection, interpretability, and safeguards against data leakage. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2, PROBAST, and ROBINS-I tools.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twenty-three studies were included: four evaluated large language models (LLMs) for patient education, and 19 investigated clinical AI applications, including biomarker identification, functional evaluation, imaging, severity diagnosis, and histological examination. The LLMs studies investigated AI chatbots like ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and New Bing Chat have shown high accuracy in answering BPH-related questions, aiding patient education. Biomarker Identification: Studies utilizing ML algorithms identified key diagnostic genes and biomarkers for BPH, improving diagnostic accuracy; Functional Evaluation: AI models accurately predict urinary flow patterns and diagnose bladder dysfunctions, reducing the need for invasive procedures; Imaging: AI improves the accuracy of prostate segmentation and volume measurement, aiding better diagnosis and treatment planning; Severity Diagnosis and Treatment: AI systems provide accurate severity assessments and predict treatment outcomes, supporting clinical decision-making; Histological Examination: AI-based models demonstrate high accuracy in diagnosing BPH and predicting tissue responses to treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI has demonstrated significant promise in BPH management, offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatment strategies, and improved patient engagement. However, challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, small and institution-specific datasets, and a lack of prospective validation studies. Ethical concerns, regulatory oversight, and physician trust also need to be addressed before widespread clinical adoption. Future research should focus on refining AI models through multi-institutional collaborations,","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"40-52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06752-7
Matthew Gaynor, Gaetano Ciancio
{"title":"Comment on: Robotic retrohepatic inferior vena cava thrombectomy using the caudate lobectomy technique: indications and initial outcomes.","authors":"Matthew Gaynor, Gaetano Ciancio","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06752-7","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06752-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"159-160"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06583-8
Umberto Anceschi, Daniele Amparore, Salvatore Basile, Rocco S Flammia, Francesco Prata, Giovanni Alemanno, Davide Buonanno, Marilda Mormando, Orazio Zappalà, Bernardino DE Concilio, Alessandro Carrara, Alberto Quarà, Michele Ortenzi, Antonio Minore, Mariavittoria Vescovo, Sabrina T DE Cillis, Alberto Ragusa, Andrea Iannuzzi, Riccardo Mastroianni, Flavia Proietti, Marialuisa Appetecchia, Rocco Papalia, Costantino Leonardo, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Antonio Celia, Paolo Prosperi, Giuseppe Simone
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) and minimally invasive total adrenalectomy (MITA) in patients with benign functional adrenal disease, using a standardized clinical outcome metric.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across six Italian institutions involved in the surgical management of adrenal disease. A total of 212 patients underwent MIPA (N.=41) or MITA (N.=171) for primary aldosteronism (PA, N.=111) or pheochromocytoma (PC, N.=101) between 2010 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the clinical cure classification proposed by Vorselaars et al., stratified by surgical approach and adrenal pathology. Perioperative parameters and postoperative steroidal replacement were also assessed.
Results: Median follow-up was 53.9 months (IQR 31.4-103.1). Rates of clinical cure, clear improvement, and failure were 61.0%, 17.1%, and 21.9% in the MIPA group, and 70.1%, 15.3%, and 14.6% in the MITA group, respectively (all P>0.54). Postoperative steroidal replacement was more common after MITA (19.5% vs. 9.9%, P=0.80). When stratified by pathology, clinical cure was significantly more frequent in PC compared to PA (86.1% vs. 52.3%, P<0.001). Complication rates were low and comparable between groups (P=0.82).
Conclusions: In selected cases, MIPA offers long-term clinical outcomes comparable to MITA, with a lower trend in steroidal replacement. Stratification by pathology confirmed the greater clinical reversibility of PC compared to PA. The clinical cure system proved applicable across disease types and surgical strategies, supporting its broader use as a pragmatic evaluative tool in adrenal surgery.
背景:本研究的目的是比较微创肾上腺部分切除术(MIPA)和微创全肾上腺切除术(MITA)对良性功能性肾上腺疾病患者的长期临床结果,采用标准化的临床结果指标。方法:我们在意大利6家涉及肾上腺疾病手术治疗的机构进行了一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。2010年至2022年间,共有212例患者因原发性醛固酮增多症(PA, n =111)或嗜铬细胞瘤(PC, n =101)接受了MIPA (n =41)或MITA (n =171)治疗。临床结果评估采用Vorselaars等人提出的临床治愈分类,根据手术入路和肾上腺病理分层。评估围手术期参数和术后类固醇置换。结果:中位随访时间为53.9个月(IQR 31.4-103.1)。MIPA组临床治愈率为61.0%、17.1%、21.9%,MITA组临床治愈率为70.1%、15.3%、14.6% (P值均为0.54)。MITA术后类固醇置换更为常见(19.5% vs. 9.9%, P=0.80)。当按病理分层时,PC的临床治愈率明显高于PA(86.1%对52.3%)。结论:在选定的病例中,MIPA提供的长期临床结果与MITA相当,类固醇替代的趋势较低。病理分层证实PC的临床可逆性高于PA。临床治疗系统被证明适用于各种疾病类型和手术策略,支持其作为肾上腺外科实用评估工具的广泛使用。
{"title":"Minimally-invasive partial versus total adrenalectomy for unilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas and pheochromocytoma: long-term results from a multicenter Italian study applying the clinical cure system.","authors":"Umberto Anceschi, Daniele Amparore, Salvatore Basile, Rocco S Flammia, Francesco Prata, Giovanni Alemanno, Davide Buonanno, Marilda Mormando, Orazio Zappalà, Bernardino DE Concilio, Alessandro Carrara, Alberto Quarà, Michele Ortenzi, Antonio Minore, Mariavittoria Vescovo, Sabrina T DE Cillis, Alberto Ragusa, Andrea Iannuzzi, Riccardo Mastroianni, Flavia Proietti, Marialuisa Appetecchia, Rocco Papalia, Costantino Leonardo, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Antonio Celia, Paolo Prosperi, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06583-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06583-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) and minimally invasive total adrenalectomy (MITA) in patients with benign functional adrenal disease, using a standardized clinical outcome metric.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across six Italian institutions involved in the surgical management of adrenal disease. A total of 212 patients underwent MIPA (N.=41) or MITA (N.=171) for primary aldosteronism (PA, N.=111) or pheochromocytoma (PC, N.=101) between 2010 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the clinical cure classification proposed by Vorselaars et al., stratified by surgical approach and adrenal pathology. Perioperative parameters and postoperative steroidal replacement were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 53.9 months (IQR 31.4-103.1). Rates of clinical cure, clear improvement, and failure were 61.0%, 17.1%, and 21.9% in the MIPA group, and 70.1%, 15.3%, and 14.6% in the MITA group, respectively (all P>0.54). Postoperative steroidal replacement was more common after MITA (19.5% vs. 9.9%, P=0.80). When stratified by pathology, clinical cure was significantly more frequent in PC compared to PA (86.1% vs. 52.3%, P<0.001). Complication rates were low and comparable between groups (P=0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In selected cases, MIPA offers long-term clinical outcomes comparable to MITA, with a lower trend in steroidal replacement. Stratification by pathology confirmed the greater clinical reversibility of PC compared to PA. The clinical cure system proved applicable across disease types and surgical strategies, supporting its broader use as a pragmatic evaluative tool in adrenal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"90-99"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06516-4
Antonio A Grosso, Fabrizio DI Maida, Luca Lambertini, Giulia Carli, Marco Saladino, Francesco L Conte, Vincenzo Salamone, Francesca Conte, Neliana Kucuku, Filippo Lipparini, Daniele Paganelli, Sofia Giudici, Rino Oriti, Riccardo Fantechi, Matteo Salvi, Gianni Vittori, Andrea Minervini, Andrea Mari
Background: Three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs) have emerged as a promising tool to enhance both surgical precision and functional outcomes in complex robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN). This study aimed to compare perioperative and functional outcomes between two cohorts of patients undergoing RAPN for totally endophytic renal tumors, with and without the use of 3DVMs.
Methods: A retrospective analysis on a prospectively maintained dataset was conducted on 277 patients treated between 2019 and 2022, including 43 who underwent surgery with 3DVM assistance and 234 who relied on conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis using a 2:1 ratio was conducted to reduce selection bias. The primary outcome was achieving the "trifecta". Predictors of trifecta achievement were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.
Results: After PSM, 43 patients in the 3DVM group were compared with 86 patients in the control group. Baseline patient- and tumor-related characteristics were similar between groups. Selective clamping was exclusively performed in the 3DVM group (16.3% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Global ischemia time was found significantly shorter in the 3D-guided group (median 10 vs. 14 min; P=0.01). Positive surgical margins (6.9% vs. 7.3%) did not differ significantly. Trifecta was achieved more frequently in the 3DVM group (76.7% vs. 68.2%, P=0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed 3DVMs as an independent predictor of trifecta success (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.12-1.99).
Conclusions: For totally endophytic renal tumors, 3DVM integration facilitated selective clamping and improved trifecta attainment, reinforcing its role in optimizing outcomes in complex nephron-sparing surgery.
背景:三维虚拟模型(3dms)已经成为一种有前途的工具,可以提高复杂机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)的手术精度和功能结果。本研究旨在比较两组接受全内生肾肿瘤RAPN的患者,在使用和不使用3DVMs的情况下的围手术期和功能结局。方法:对2019年至2022年期间接受治疗的277例患者的前瞻性数据集进行回顾性分析,其中43例接受3DVM辅助手术,234例依赖传统二维(2D)成像。采用2:1的比例进行倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,以减少选择偏差。主要成果是实现了“三连冠”。采用多元逻辑回归分析三联体成功的预测因素。结果:PSM后3DVM组43例,对照组86例。两组之间的基线患者和肿瘤相关特征相似。3DVM组只行选择性夹持(16.3% vs. 0%, P=0.01)。3d引导组整体缺血时间明显缩短(中位10分钟vs. 14分钟;P=0.01)。阳性手术切缘(6.9% vs. 7.3%)无显著差异。3DVM组获得三联曲的频率更高(76.7% vs. 68.2%, P=0.04)。多变量分析证实3DVMs是三联体成功的独立预测因子(OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.12-1.99)。结论:对于完全内生的肾肿瘤,3DVM集成有助于选择性夹持和提高三节瓣的实现,加强了其在复杂的保留肾单元手术中优化预后的作用。
{"title":"Three-dimensional virtual model for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in totally endophytic renal tumors: a propensity-score matching analysis with a control group.","authors":"Antonio A Grosso, Fabrizio DI Maida, Luca Lambertini, Giulia Carli, Marco Saladino, Francesco L Conte, Vincenzo Salamone, Francesca Conte, Neliana Kucuku, Filippo Lipparini, Daniele Paganelli, Sofia Giudici, Rino Oriti, Riccardo Fantechi, Matteo Salvi, Gianni Vittori, Andrea Minervini, Andrea Mari","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06516-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06516-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs) have emerged as a promising tool to enhance both surgical precision and functional outcomes in complex robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN). This study aimed to compare perioperative and functional outcomes between two cohorts of patients undergoing RAPN for totally endophytic renal tumors, with and without the use of 3DVMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis on a prospectively maintained dataset was conducted on 277 patients treated between 2019 and 2022, including 43 who underwent surgery with 3DVM assistance and 234 who relied on conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis using a 2:1 ratio was conducted to reduce selection bias. The primary outcome was achieving the \"trifecta\". Predictors of trifecta achievement were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 43 patients in the 3DVM group were compared with 86 patients in the control group. Baseline patient- and tumor-related characteristics were similar between groups. Selective clamping was exclusively performed in the 3DVM group (16.3% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Global ischemia time was found significantly shorter in the 3D-guided group (median 10 vs. 14 min; P=0.01). Positive surgical margins (6.9% vs. 7.3%) did not differ significantly. Trifecta was achieved more frequently in the 3DVM group (76.7% vs. 68.2%, P=0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed 3DVMs as an independent predictor of trifecta success (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.12-1.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For totally endophytic renal tumors, 3DVM integration facilitated selective clamping and improved trifecta attainment, reinforcing its role in optimizing outcomes in complex nephron-sparing surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-16DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06476-6
Hakan B Haberal, Valerio Santarelli, Fabio M Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Alexandru Turcan, Flavia Tamborino, Filippo Carletti, Luca Lambertini, Giulio Avesani, Matteo Pacini, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan R Torres-Anguiano, Simone Crivellaro
Background: Simple nephrectomy (SN), a procedure performed for benign kidney conditions, can be more challenging and complicated than radical nephrectomy (RN). With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, robotic platforms have also been introduced for SN. In this study, we aim to compare perioperative outcomes and complications between single-port (SP) robotic-assisted (RA) SN and RN in a tertiary referral center.
Methods: Data from 63 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RASN and SP-RARN between December 2018 and December 2024 at a single center, performed by a single surgeon, were evaluated. We compared baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
Results: A total of 33 SP-RARN and 30 SP-RASN were included. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operation time and estimated blood loss (P=0.741, P=0.587, respectively). None of the patients in the SP-RASN group required conversion to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications were observed. In the SP-RASN group, the median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 0.5 (0-1.25) days, and the same-day discharge (SDD) rate was 50%. The numbers of patients with Clavien grade 1 and grade 2 complications for SP-RASN was 3 (10%) and 4 (13.3%), respectively. There was a 0% incidence of major postoperative complications (≥Clavien-Dindo grade 3). LOS, SDD, postoperative complications and readmission rates were similar between groups (P=0.120, P=0.064, P=0.854, P=0.498, respectively).
Conclusions: SP-RASN is a feasible option for the management of benign renal conditions/diseases, offering a low postoperative complication rate and the possibility of SDD.
{"title":"Is it simpler with single-port?. A comparative analysis of single-port robot-assisted simple and radical nephrectomy in a tertiary referral center.","authors":"Hakan B Haberal, Valerio Santarelli, Fabio M Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Alexandru Turcan, Flavia Tamborino, Filippo Carletti, Luca Lambertini, Giulio Avesani, Matteo Pacini, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan R Torres-Anguiano, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06476-6","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06476-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple nephrectomy (SN), a procedure performed for benign kidney conditions, can be more challenging and complicated than radical nephrectomy (RN). With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, robotic platforms have also been introduced for SN. In this study, we aim to compare perioperative outcomes and complications between single-port (SP) robotic-assisted (RA) SN and RN in a tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 63 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RASN and SP-RARN between December 2018 and December 2024 at a single center, performed by a single surgeon, were evaluated. We compared baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 SP-RARN and 30 SP-RASN were included. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operation time and estimated blood loss (P=0.741, P=0.587, respectively). None of the patients in the SP-RASN group required conversion to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications were observed. In the SP-RASN group, the median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 0.5 (0-1.25) days, and the same-day discharge (SDD) rate was 50%. The numbers of patients with Clavien grade 1 and grade 2 complications for SP-RASN was 3 (10%) and 4 (13.3%), respectively. There was a 0% incidence of major postoperative complications (≥Clavien-Dindo grade 3). LOS, SDD, postoperative complications and readmission rates were similar between groups (P=0.120, P=0.064, P=0.854, P=0.498, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SP-RASN is a feasible option for the management of benign renal conditions/diseases, offering a low postoperative complication rate and the possibility of SDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145071166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}