首页 > 最新文献

Minerva Urology and Nephrology最新文献

英文 中文
Balancing maternal and fetal safety in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: report of our experience. 非肌浸润性膀胱癌的母婴安全平衡:我们的经验报告。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06842-9
Beatrice Crestani, Valeria Tamborrino, Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Antonelli, Simone Garzon, Mariachiara Bosco, Piercarlo Zorzato, Massimo P Franchi, Stefano Uccella
{"title":"Balancing maternal and fetal safety in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: report of our experience.","authors":"Beatrice Crestani, Valeria Tamborrino, Riccardo Bertolo, Alessandro Antonelli, Simone Garzon, Mariachiara Bosco, Piercarlo Zorzato, Massimo P Franchi, Stefano Uccella","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06842-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06842-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"155-157"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends for ejaculatory sparing and minimally invasive surgical treatments adoption for lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH in Italy: screenshot from the Italian society of urology (SIU) benign research network. 意大利与BPH相关的下尿路症状的射精节约和微创手术治疗趋势:截图来自意大利泌尿外科学会(SIU)良性研究网络。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06569-3
Andrea Mari, Luca Cindolo, Cristian Fiori, Luca Lambertini, Silvia Secco, Giorgio I Russo, Francesco Sessa, Andrea Cocci, Giovanni Cochetti, Roberto Castellucci, Daniele Amparore, Daniele Castellani, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Sebastiano Cimino, Antonio Galfano, Ettore Mearini, Andrea B Galosi, Sergio Serni, Francesco Porpiglia, Andrea Salonia, Vincenzo Ficarra, Giuseppe Carrieri, Vincenzo Mirone, Andrea Minervini

Background: Minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are increasingly adopted due to fewer complications and better preservation of ejaculatory function. However, real-world data on patient selection and clinical application in Italy remain scarce.

Methods: Patients undergoing Aquablation, Rezum, iTIND, TPLA, or PUL from October 2022 to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled by 15 Italian centers in the SIU Research Network. Baseline clinical, anatomical, and functional data were collected via a secure digital platform. Data were recorded using standardized electronic case report forms, and patient-reported outcomes were gathered through validated questionnaires administered at baseline and during follow-up.

Results: A total of 312 patients were enrolled: 30 (9.6%) Aquablation, 97 (31.1%) Rezum, 49 (15.7%) iTIND, 108 (34.6%) TPLA, and 28 (9.0%) PUL. iTIND patients were the youngest (median age 47, IQR 42-57), had the lowest prostate volume (30 mL, IQR 27.5-40), lowest comorbidity scores, and poorest Qmax (6.2 mL/s, IQR 5-8). Aquablation and TPLA were adopted for larger prostates (70 mL, IQR 50-80 and 67 mL, IQR 45-85, respectively). Median lobe was most frequent in Rezum (56.7%) patients. PUL patients had the lowest post-void residual (20 mL, IQR 5-60). Rezum and TPLA patients reported better ejaculatory function (P<0.02), while iTIND patients showed the highest dysfunction (P<0.05). Baseline QoL scores were comparable across groups.

Conclusions: This interim analysis shows that MIST adoption in Italy is influenced by prostate size, age, comorbidities, and functional profiles. The findings describe baseline selection patterns only, with postoperative outcomes to be reported in future analyses.

背景:微创手术治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)因其并发症少、射精功能保存好而越来越多地被采用。然而,关于意大利患者选择和临床应用的实际数据仍然很少。方法:2022年10月至2024年12月期间接受水消融、Rezum、iTIND、TPLA或PUL的患者被SIU研究网络的15个意大利中心前瞻性纳入。基线临床、解剖和功能数据通过安全的数字平台收集。使用标准化的电子病例报告表格记录数据,并通过基线和随访期间进行的有效问卷收集患者报告的结果。结果:共纳入312例患者:Aquablation 30例(9.6%),Rezum 97例(31.1%),iTIND 49例(15.7%),TPLA 108例(34.6%),PUL 28例(9.0%)。iTIND患者最年轻(中位年龄47岁,IQR 42-57),前列腺体积最低(30 mL, IQR 27.5-40),合并症评分最低,Qmax最低(6.2 mL/s, IQR 5-8)。对于较大的前列腺(70 mL, IQR 50-80; 67 mL, IQR 45-85)采用水消融和TPLA。中叶最常见于Rezum患者(56.7%)。PUL患者虚空后残留最低(20 mL, IQR 5-60)。Rezum和TPLA患者报告了更好的射精功能(结论:这一中期分析表明,在意大利,MIST的采用受到前列腺大小、年龄、合并症和功能概况的影响。研究结果仅描述了基线选择模式,术后结果将在未来的分析中报告。
{"title":"Trends for ejaculatory sparing and minimally invasive surgical treatments adoption for lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH in Italy: screenshot from the Italian society of urology (SIU) benign research network.","authors":"Andrea Mari, Luca Cindolo, Cristian Fiori, Luca Lambertini, Silvia Secco, Giorgio I Russo, Francesco Sessa, Andrea Cocci, Giovanni Cochetti, Roberto Castellucci, Daniele Amparore, Daniele Castellani, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Sebastiano Cimino, Antonio Galfano, Ettore Mearini, Andrea B Galosi, Sergio Serni, Francesco Porpiglia, Andrea Salonia, Vincenzo Ficarra, Giuseppe Carrieri, Vincenzo Mirone, Andrea Minervini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06569-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06569-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are increasingly adopted due to fewer complications and better preservation of ejaculatory function. However, real-world data on patient selection and clinical application in Italy remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing Aquablation, Rezum, iTIND, TPLA, or PUL from October 2022 to December 2024 were prospectively enrolled by 15 Italian centers in the SIU Research Network. Baseline clinical, anatomical, and functional data were collected via a secure digital platform. Data were recorded using standardized electronic case report forms, and patient-reported outcomes were gathered through validated questionnaires administered at baseline and during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 312 patients were enrolled: 30 (9.6%) Aquablation, 97 (31.1%) Rezum, 49 (15.7%) iTIND, 108 (34.6%) TPLA, and 28 (9.0%) PUL. iTIND patients were the youngest (median age 47, IQR 42-57), had the lowest prostate volume (30 mL, IQR 27.5-40), lowest comorbidity scores, and poorest Qmax (6.2 mL/s, IQR 5-8). Aquablation and TPLA were adopted for larger prostates (70 mL, IQR 50-80 and 67 mL, IQR 45-85, respectively). Median lobe was most frequent in Rezum (56.7%) patients. PUL patients had the lowest post-void residual (20 mL, IQR 5-60). Rezum and TPLA patients reported better ejaculatory function (P<0.02), while iTIND patients showed the highest dysfunction (P<0.05). Baseline QoL scores were comparable across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This interim analysis shows that MIST adoption in Italy is influenced by prostate size, age, comorbidities, and functional profiles. The findings describe baseline selection patterns only, with postoperative outcomes to be reported in future analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of artificial intelligence in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: a systematic review. 人工智能在预测肾移植中移植物存活中的作用:系统综述。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06559-0
Francesco DI Bello, Andrea Gallioli, Alessio Pecoraro, Thomas Prudhomme, Alberto Piana, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Hakan B Haberal, Muhammet I Dönmez, Alicia Lopez-Abad, Donato Cannoletta, Stefano Mancon, Lluis Guirado, Carma Facundo, Andres K Kanashiro, Pavel Gavrilov, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Josep M Gaya, Alberto Breda, Angelo Territo

Introduction: Gradient-boosting (GB) algorithm is considered as the state-of-the-art algorithm for prediction of survival. The aim of the current study was consolidating the evidence on GB machine-learning (ML) model to predict graft survival (GS) after kidney transplant (KT).

Evidence acquisition: A systematic search (PROSPERO: CRD42025645353) with a qualitative analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Prediction-model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).

Evidence synthesis: Overall, 15 studies involving 889,657 patients were included in the final analysis. Of those, 14,334 included GS information. According to ML algorithm, 12 (80.3%) studies relied on eXtremeGB, two (13.3%) on StochasticGB and one (6.4%) on lightGB. The model performance was evaluated with Area Under Curve (AUC) methodology in 12 (80%) of papers and ranged from 0.715 to 0.989. The Brier-score was evaluated in five (33.3%) papers and ranged from 0.020 to 0.14. The C-index and/or Accuracy were evaluated in three (20%) papers and ranged, in respectively, from 0.635 to 0.837, and from 0.81 to 0.979.

Conclusions: The current systematic review showed a promising potential role of GB in the GS prediction after KT. However, ML models should be carefully interpreted before being used in clinical practice.

GB (Gradient-boosting)算法被认为是目前最先进的生存预测算法。本研究的目的是巩固GB机器学习(ML)模型预测肾移植(KT)后移植物存活(GS)的证据。证据获取:系统检索(PROSPERO: CRD42025645353)并根据PRISMA声明进行定性分析。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估研究质量和偏倚风险。证据综合:总的来说,最终分析纳入了15项研究,涉及889,657例患者。其中14334件包含GS信息。根据ML算法,12项(80.3%)研究依赖于eXtremeGB, 2项(13.3%)依赖于StochasticGB, 1项(6.4%)依赖于lightGB。采用曲线下面积(Area Under Curve, AUC)方法对12篇(80%)论文的模型性能进行评价,结果在0.715 ~ 0.989之间。brier评分有5篇(33.3%),范围为0.020 ~ 0.14。在三篇(20%)论文中评估了C-index和/或Accuracy,范围分别为0.635至0.837和0.81至0.979。结论:目前的系统评价显示GB在KT后GS预测中具有潜在的作用。然而,ML模型在临床应用前应仔细解释。
{"title":"The role of artificial intelligence in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: a systematic review.","authors":"Francesco DI Bello, Andrea Gallioli, Alessio Pecoraro, Thomas Prudhomme, Alberto Piana, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Hakan B Haberal, Muhammet I Dönmez, Alicia Lopez-Abad, Donato Cannoletta, Stefano Mancon, Lluis Guirado, Carma Facundo, Andres K Kanashiro, Pavel Gavrilov, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Josep M Gaya, Alberto Breda, Angelo Territo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06559-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06559-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gradient-boosting (GB) algorithm is considered as the state-of-the-art algorithm for prediction of survival. The aim of the current study was consolidating the evidence on GB machine-learning (ML) model to predict graft survival (GS) after kidney transplant (KT).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search (PROSPERO: CRD42025645353) with a qualitative analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Prediction-model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, 15 studies involving 889,657 patients were included in the final analysis. Of those, 14,334 included GS information. According to ML algorithm, 12 (80.3%) studies relied on eXtremeGB, two (13.3%) on StochasticGB and one (6.4%) on lightGB. The model performance was evaluated with Area Under Curve (AUC) methodology in 12 (80%) of papers and ranged from 0.715 to 0.989. The Brier-score was evaluated in five (33.3%) papers and ranged from 0.020 to 0.14. The C-index and/or Accuracy were evaluated in three (20%) papers and ranged, in respectively, from 0.635 to 0.837, and from 0.81 to 0.979.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current systematic review showed a promising potential role of GB in the GS prediction after KT. However, ML models should be carefully interpreted before being used in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative efficacy and safety of intelligent pressure-controlled versus flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath for 2-4 cm renal calculi. 智能压力控制与柔性真空辅助输尿管接入鞘治疗 2-4 厘米肾结石的疗效和安全性比较。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05814-2
Xin Huang, Leming Song, Xiaolin Deng, Hua Chen, Jiansheng Xiao, Jin Kuang, Zhiwen Wang, Xiaoling Deng, Qiliang Zhai

Background: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is being increasingly used to treat 2-4 cm renal stones, which can be attributed to advances in flexible ureteroscopes and ureteral access sheaths (UASs). Despite the improvement and application of flexible vacuum-assisted (FV) and intelligent pressure-controlled (IPC) UASs, no studies have compared their therapeutic efficacy and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of IPC-UAS and FV-UAS in RIRS 2-4 cm renal stones.

Methods: We included 96 and 103 patients who underwent IPC-UAS and FV-UAS RIRS, respectively, for 2-4 cm renal stones. Stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The immediate SFR was 69.8% and 82.5% in the IPC-UAS and FV-UAS groups, respectively (P<0.05). There were no significant between-group differences in the 1-month SFR (84.4% vs. 84.5%, P>0.05). The IPC-UAS group had a shorter hospital stay (5.2±2.4 vs. 6.2±3.2 days, P=0.018) and lower cost (CNY13014.7±3240.7 vs. CNY14022.5±2301.6, P=0.012) than the FV-UAS group. There were no significant between-group differences in operative time or complications.

Conclusions: Regarding RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones, the IPC-UAS group can achieve a 1-month SFR similar to that of the FV-UAS group, with shorter hospitalization and lower cost. Additionally, the IPC-UAS is a promising device for efficient and safe RIRS, considering its intelligent pressure regulation. Our findings could inform optimal UAS selection for managing large renal calculi and demonstrate the utility of the novel IPC-UAS in improving outcomes of RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones.

背景:逆行肾内手术(RIRS)越来越多地用于治疗2-4厘米的肾结石,这归功于柔性输尿管镜和输尿管通道鞘(UAS)的进步。尽管柔性真空辅助(FV)和智能压力控制(IPC)UAS得到了改进和应用,但还没有研究对其治疗效果和安全性进行比较。因此,本研究旨在比较 IPC-UAS 和 FV-UAS 对 RIRS 2-4 厘米肾结石的疗效和安全性:我们分别纳入了 96 名和 103 名接受 IPC-UAS 和 FV-UAS RIRS 的 2-4 厘米肾结石患者。比较了两组患者的无结石率(SFR)、手术时间和并发症:结果:IPC-UAS组和FV-UAS组的即时无石率分别为69.8%和82.5%(P0.05)。IPC-UAS组比FV-UAS组住院时间短(5.2±2.4天 vs. 6.2±3.2天,P=0.018),费用低(13014.7±3240.7元人民币 vs. 14022.5±2301.6元人民币,P=0.012)。手术时间和并发症在组间无明显差异:结论:就2-4厘米肾结石的RIRS而言,IPC-UAS组的1个月SFR与FV-UAS组相似,住院时间更短,费用更低。此外,考虑到其智能压力调节功能,IPC-UAS 是一种有望实现高效、安全 RIRS 的设备。我们的研究结果可以为管理大型肾结石的 UAS 选择提供参考,并证明了新型 IPC-UAS 在改善 2-4 厘米肾结石 RIRS 治疗效果方面的实用性。
{"title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of intelligent pressure-controlled versus flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath for 2-4 cm renal calculi.","authors":"Xin Huang, Leming Song, Xiaolin Deng, Hua Chen, Jiansheng Xiao, Jin Kuang, Zhiwen Wang, Xiaoling Deng, Qiliang Zhai","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05814-2","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05814-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is being increasingly used to treat 2-4 cm renal stones, which can be attributed to advances in flexible ureteroscopes and ureteral access sheaths (UASs). Despite the improvement and application of flexible vacuum-assisted (FV) and intelligent pressure-controlled (IPC) UASs, no studies have compared their therapeutic efficacy and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of IPC-UAS and FV-UAS in RIRS 2-4 cm renal stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 96 and 103 patients who underwent IPC-UAS and FV-UAS RIRS, respectively, for 2-4 cm renal stones. Stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The immediate SFR was 69.8% and 82.5% in the IPC-UAS and FV-UAS groups, respectively (P<0.05). There were no significant between-group differences in the 1-month SFR (84.4% vs. 84.5%, P>0.05). The IPC-UAS group had a shorter hospital stay (5.2±2.4 vs. 6.2±3.2 days, P=0.018) and lower cost (CNY13014.7±3240.7 vs. CNY14022.5±2301.6, P=0.012) than the FV-UAS group. There were no significant between-group differences in operative time or complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones, the IPC-UAS group can achieve a 1-month SFR similar to that of the FV-UAS group, with shorter hospitalization and lower cost. Additionally, the IPC-UAS is a promising device for efficient and safe RIRS, considering its intelligent pressure regulation. Our findings could inform optimal UAS selection for managing large renal calculi and demonstrate the utility of the novel IPC-UAS in improving outcomes of RIRS for 2-4 cm renal stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing urology residency education in Italy: a national tele-lecture experience. 优化泌尿外科住院医师教育在意大利:全国远程讲座经验。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06832-6
Andrea Piccolini, Marco Paciotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Bartoletti, Andrea B Galosi, Carlo Bettocchi, Alberto Briganti, Eugenio Brunocilla, Antonio Carbone, Luca Carmignani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Maria A Cerruto, Sebastiano Cimino, Luigi Cormio, Luigi F DA Pozzo, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Rocco Damiano, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Marco DE Sio, Pasquale DI Tonno, Vincenzo Ficarra, Enrico Finazzi Agrò, Cristian Fiori, Giorgio Franco, Paolo Gontero, Ciro Imbimbo, Giovanni Lughezzani, Massimo Madonia, Lorenzo Masieri, Ettore Mearini, Salvatore Micali, Andrea Minervini, Emanuele Montanari, Giuseppe Maria Morgia, Gennaro Musi, Rocco Papalia, Francesco Porpiglia, Bernardo Rocco, Andrea Salonia, Riccardo Schiavina, Luigi Schips, Alessandro Sciarra, Sergio Serni, Alchiede Simonato, Carlo Terrone, Andrea Tubaro, Alessandro Volpe, Nicolò M Buffi
{"title":"Optimizing urology residency education in Italy: a national tele-lecture experience.","authors":"Andrea Piccolini, Marco Paciotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Bartoletti, Andrea B Galosi, Carlo Bettocchi, Alberto Briganti, Eugenio Brunocilla, Antonio Carbone, Luca Carmignani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Maria A Cerruto, Sebastiano Cimino, Luigi Cormio, Luigi F DA Pozzo, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Rocco Damiano, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Marco DE Sio, Pasquale DI Tonno, Vincenzo Ficarra, Enrico Finazzi Agrò, Cristian Fiori, Giorgio Franco, Paolo Gontero, Ciro Imbimbo, Giovanni Lughezzani, Massimo Madonia, Lorenzo Masieri, Ettore Mearini, Salvatore Micali, Andrea Minervini, Emanuele Montanari, Giuseppe Maria Morgia, Gennaro Musi, Rocco Papalia, Francesco Porpiglia, Bernardo Rocco, Andrea Salonia, Riccardo Schiavina, Luigi Schips, Alessandro Sciarra, Sergio Serni, Alchiede Simonato, Carlo Terrone, Andrea Tubaro, Alessandro Volpe, Nicolò M Buffi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06832-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06832-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"152-155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current role of artificial intelligence in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. 目前人工智能在良性前列腺增生管理中的作用:系统综述。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06658-3
Manfredi B Sequi, Antonio L Pastore, Yazan Al Salhi, Riccardo Lombardo, Fabio M Valenzi, Paolo P Suraci, Onofrio A Rera, Silvio Scalzo, Alice Antonioni, Damiano Graziani, Giorgio Martino, Giuseppe Candita, Filippo Gianfrancesco, Paolo Benanti, Luca Erra, Giovanni DI Gregorio, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Antonio Carbone, Andrea Fuschi
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have revolutionized various fields, including urology. This review examines the application of AI in managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), focusing on its potential to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and patient education.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IeeeXplore, and Cochrane databases were searched till December 2024. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies on artificial intelligence and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Data were divided into two broad categories: Large language models (LLMs) for patient education and clinical AI applications. Clinical AI applications were further divided in: biomarker identification, functional diagnostics, imaging, severity diagnosis, treatment prediction, and histological examination. Data extraction included study characteristics, data sources, model development and validation methods, handling of missing data, calibration, threshold selection, interpretability, and safeguards against data leakage. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2, PROBAST, and ROBINS-I tools.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twenty-three studies were included: four evaluated large language models (LLMs) for patient education, and 19 investigated clinical AI applications, including biomarker identification, functional evaluation, imaging, severity diagnosis, and histological examination. The LLMs studies investigated AI chatbots like ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and New Bing Chat have shown high accuracy in answering BPH-related questions, aiding patient education. Biomarker Identification: Studies utilizing ML algorithms identified key diagnostic genes and biomarkers for BPH, improving diagnostic accuracy; Functional Evaluation: AI models accurately predict urinary flow patterns and diagnose bladder dysfunctions, reducing the need for invasive procedures; Imaging: AI improves the accuracy of prostate segmentation and volume measurement, aiding better diagnosis and treatment planning; Severity Diagnosis and Treatment: AI systems provide accurate severity assessments and predict treatment outcomes, supporting clinical decision-making; Histological Examination: AI-based models demonstrate high accuracy in diagnosing BPH and predicting tissue responses to treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI has demonstrated significant promise in BPH management, offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatment strategies, and improved patient engagement. However, challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, small and institution-specific datasets, and a lack of prospective validation studies. Ethical concerns, regulatory oversight, and physician trust also need to be addressed before widespread clinical adoption. Future research should focus on refining AI models through multi-institutional collaborations,
人工智能(AI)及其子集,包括机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL),已经彻底改变了包括泌尿外科在内的各个领域。本文综述了人工智能在治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)中的应用,重点介绍了人工智能在提高诊断、治疗和患者教育方面的潜力。证据获取:检索PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IeeeXplore和Cochrane数据库至2024年12月。遵循PRISMA指南确定人工智能和良性前列腺增生的合格研究。数据分为两大类:用于患者教育的大型语言模型(llm)和临床人工智能应用。临床人工智能应用进一步分为:生物标志物鉴定、功能诊断、影像学、严重程度诊断、治疗预测和组织学检查。数据提取包括研究特征、数据源、模型开发和验证方法、缺失数据的处理、校准、阈值选择、可解释性和防止数据泄漏的保护措施。使用QUADAS-2、PROBAST和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。证据综合:纳入23项研究:4项评估用于患者教育的大型语言模型(llm), 19项调查临床人工智能应用,包括生物标志物鉴定、功能评估、成像、严重程度诊断和组织学检查。法学硕士研究调查了ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4和New Bing Chat等人工智能聊天机器人,它们在回答bph相关问题、帮助患者教育方面表现出了很高的准确性。生物标志物鉴定:利用ML算法鉴定BPH的关键诊断基因和生物标志物,提高诊断准确性的研究;功能评估:AI模型准确预测尿流模式,诊断膀胱功能障碍,减少侵入性手术的需要;成像:人工智能提高了前列腺分割和体积测量的准确性,有助于更好的诊断和治疗计划;严重程度诊断和治疗:人工智能系统提供准确的严重程度评估和预测治疗结果,支持临床决策;组织学检查:基于人工智能的模型在诊断BPH和预测组织对治疗的反应方面显示出很高的准确性。结论:人工智能在BPH管理中表现出了显著的前景,提供了更高的诊断准确性,个性化的治疗策略,并改善了患者的参与度。然而,挑战仍然存在,包括数据异质性,小型和特定机构的数据集,以及缺乏前瞻性验证研究。在广泛的临床应用之前,伦理问题、监管监督和医生信任也需要得到解决。未来的研究应侧重于通过多机构合作来完善人工智能模型,开发标准化数据集,并进行真实世界的验证研究。随着技术的不断进步,人工智能有可能彻底改变BPH的管理,最终改善患者的治疗效果和医疗效率。
{"title":"Current role of artificial intelligence in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review.","authors":"Manfredi B Sequi, Antonio L Pastore, Yazan Al Salhi, Riccardo Lombardo, Fabio M Valenzi, Paolo P Suraci, Onofrio A Rera, Silvio Scalzo, Alice Antonioni, Damiano Graziani, Giorgio Martino, Giuseppe Candita, Filippo Gianfrancesco, Paolo Benanti, Luca Erra, Giovanni DI Gregorio, Antonio Cicione, Cosimo DE Nunzio, Antonio Carbone, Andrea Fuschi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06658-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06658-3","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;Artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have revolutionized various fields, including urology. This review examines the application of AI in managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), focusing on its potential to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and patient education.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evidence acquisition: &lt;/strong&gt;PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IeeeXplore, and Cochrane databases were searched till December 2024. PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify eligible studies on artificial intelligence and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Data were divided into two broad categories: Large language models (LLMs) for patient education and clinical AI applications. Clinical AI applications were further divided in: biomarker identification, functional diagnostics, imaging, severity diagnosis, treatment prediction, and histological examination. Data extraction included study characteristics, data sources, model development and validation methods, handling of missing data, calibration, threshold selection, interpretability, and safeguards against data leakage. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2, PROBAST, and ROBINS-I tools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evidence synthesis: &lt;/strong&gt;Twenty-three studies were included: four evaluated large language models (LLMs) for patient education, and 19 investigated clinical AI applications, including biomarker identification, functional evaluation, imaging, severity diagnosis, and histological examination. The LLMs studies investigated AI chatbots like ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and New Bing Chat have shown high accuracy in answering BPH-related questions, aiding patient education. Biomarker Identification: Studies utilizing ML algorithms identified key diagnostic genes and biomarkers for BPH, improving diagnostic accuracy; Functional Evaluation: AI models accurately predict urinary flow patterns and diagnose bladder dysfunctions, reducing the need for invasive procedures; Imaging: AI improves the accuracy of prostate segmentation and volume measurement, aiding better diagnosis and treatment planning; Severity Diagnosis and Treatment: AI systems provide accurate severity assessments and predict treatment outcomes, supporting clinical decision-making; Histological Examination: AI-based models demonstrate high accuracy in diagnosing BPH and predicting tissue responses to treatments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;AI has demonstrated significant promise in BPH management, offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatment strategies, and improved patient engagement. However, challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, small and institution-specific datasets, and a lack of prospective validation studies. Ethical concerns, regulatory oversight, and physician trust also need to be addressed before widespread clinical adoption. Future research should focus on refining AI models through multi-institutional collaborations,","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"40-52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on: Robotic retrohepatic inferior vena cava thrombectomy using the caudate lobectomy technique: indications and initial outcomes. 评论:使用尾状叶切除技术的机器人肝后下腔静脉血栓切除术:适应症和初步结果。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06752-7
Matthew Gaynor, Gaetano Ciancio
{"title":"Comment on: Robotic retrohepatic inferior vena cava thrombectomy using the caudate lobectomy technique: indications and initial outcomes.","authors":"Matthew Gaynor, Gaetano Ciancio","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06752-7","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06752-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"159-160"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimally-invasive partial versus total adrenalectomy for unilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas and pheochromocytoma: long-term results from a multicenter Italian study applying the clinical cure system. 微创部分与全肾上腺切除术治疗单侧醛固酮分泌腺瘤和嗜铬细胞瘤:意大利一项应用临床治愈系统的多中心研究的长期结果
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06583-8
Umberto Anceschi, Daniele Amparore, Salvatore Basile, Rocco S Flammia, Francesco Prata, Giovanni Alemanno, Davide Buonanno, Marilda Mormando, Orazio Zappalà, Bernardino DE Concilio, Alessandro Carrara, Alberto Quarà, Michele Ortenzi, Antonio Minore, Mariavittoria Vescovo, Sabrina T DE Cillis, Alberto Ragusa, Andrea Iannuzzi, Riccardo Mastroianni, Flavia Proietti, Marialuisa Appetecchia, Rocco Papalia, Costantino Leonardo, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Antonio Celia, Paolo Prosperi, Giuseppe Simone

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) and minimally invasive total adrenalectomy (MITA) in patients with benign functional adrenal disease, using a standardized clinical outcome metric.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across six Italian institutions involved in the surgical management of adrenal disease. A total of 212 patients underwent MIPA (N.=41) or MITA (N.=171) for primary aldosteronism (PA, N.=111) or pheochromocytoma (PC, N.=101) between 2010 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the clinical cure classification proposed by Vorselaars et al., stratified by surgical approach and adrenal pathology. Perioperative parameters and postoperative steroidal replacement were also assessed.

Results: Median follow-up was 53.9 months (IQR 31.4-103.1). Rates of clinical cure, clear improvement, and failure were 61.0%, 17.1%, and 21.9% in the MIPA group, and 70.1%, 15.3%, and 14.6% in the MITA group, respectively (all P>0.54). Postoperative steroidal replacement was more common after MITA (19.5% vs. 9.9%, P=0.80). When stratified by pathology, clinical cure was significantly more frequent in PC compared to PA (86.1% vs. 52.3%, P<0.001). Complication rates were low and comparable between groups (P=0.82).

Conclusions: In selected cases, MIPA offers long-term clinical outcomes comparable to MITA, with a lower trend in steroidal replacement. Stratification by pathology confirmed the greater clinical reversibility of PC compared to PA. The clinical cure system proved applicable across disease types and surgical strategies, supporting its broader use as a pragmatic evaluative tool in adrenal surgery.

背景:本研究的目的是比较微创肾上腺部分切除术(MIPA)和微创全肾上腺切除术(MITA)对良性功能性肾上腺疾病患者的长期临床结果,采用标准化的临床结果指标。方法:我们在意大利6家涉及肾上腺疾病手术治疗的机构进行了一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。2010年至2022年间,共有212例患者因原发性醛固酮增多症(PA, n =111)或嗜铬细胞瘤(PC, n =101)接受了MIPA (n =41)或MITA (n =171)治疗。临床结果评估采用Vorselaars等人提出的临床治愈分类,根据手术入路和肾上腺病理分层。评估围手术期参数和术后类固醇置换。结果:中位随访时间为53.9个月(IQR 31.4-103.1)。MIPA组临床治愈率为61.0%、17.1%、21.9%,MITA组临床治愈率为70.1%、15.3%、14.6% (P值均为0.54)。MITA术后类固醇置换更为常见(19.5% vs. 9.9%, P=0.80)。当按病理分层时,PC的临床治愈率明显高于PA(86.1%对52.3%)。结论:在选定的病例中,MIPA提供的长期临床结果与MITA相当,类固醇替代的趋势较低。病理分层证实PC的临床可逆性高于PA。临床治疗系统被证明适用于各种疾病类型和手术策略,支持其作为肾上腺外科实用评估工具的广泛使用。
{"title":"Minimally-invasive partial versus total adrenalectomy for unilateral aldosterone-producing adenomas and pheochromocytoma: long-term results from a multicenter Italian study applying the clinical cure system.","authors":"Umberto Anceschi, Daniele Amparore, Salvatore Basile, Rocco S Flammia, Francesco Prata, Giovanni Alemanno, Davide Buonanno, Marilda Mormando, Orazio Zappalà, Bernardino DE Concilio, Alessandro Carrara, Alberto Quarà, Michele Ortenzi, Antonio Minore, Mariavittoria Vescovo, Sabrina T DE Cillis, Alberto Ragusa, Andrea Iannuzzi, Riccardo Mastroianni, Flavia Proietti, Marialuisa Appetecchia, Rocco Papalia, Costantino Leonardo, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Antonio Celia, Paolo Prosperi, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06583-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06583-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive partial adrenalectomy (MIPA) and minimally invasive total adrenalectomy (MITA) in patients with benign functional adrenal disease, using a standardized clinical outcome metric.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across six Italian institutions involved in the surgical management of adrenal disease. A total of 212 patients underwent MIPA (N.=41) or MITA (N.=171) for primary aldosteronism (PA, N.=111) or pheochromocytoma (PC, N.=101) between 2010 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the clinical cure classification proposed by Vorselaars et al., stratified by surgical approach and adrenal pathology. Perioperative parameters and postoperative steroidal replacement were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 53.9 months (IQR 31.4-103.1). Rates of clinical cure, clear improvement, and failure were 61.0%, 17.1%, and 21.9% in the MIPA group, and 70.1%, 15.3%, and 14.6% in the MITA group, respectively (all P>0.54). Postoperative steroidal replacement was more common after MITA (19.5% vs. 9.9%, P=0.80). When stratified by pathology, clinical cure was significantly more frequent in PC compared to PA (86.1% vs. 52.3%, P<0.001). Complication rates were low and comparable between groups (P=0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In selected cases, MIPA offers long-term clinical outcomes comparable to MITA, with a lower trend in steroidal replacement. Stratification by pathology confirmed the greater clinical reversibility of PC compared to PA. The clinical cure system proved applicable across disease types and surgical strategies, supporting its broader use as a pragmatic evaluative tool in adrenal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"90-99"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Three-dimensional virtual model for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in totally endophytic renal tumors: a propensity-score matching analysis with a control group. 机器人辅助全内生肾肿瘤部分切除的三维虚拟模型:与对照组的倾向评分匹配分析。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06516-4
Antonio A Grosso, Fabrizio DI Maida, Luca Lambertini, Giulia Carli, Marco Saladino, Francesco L Conte, Vincenzo Salamone, Francesca Conte, Neliana Kucuku, Filippo Lipparini, Daniele Paganelli, Sofia Giudici, Rino Oriti, Riccardo Fantechi, Matteo Salvi, Gianni Vittori, Andrea Minervini, Andrea Mari

Background: Three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs) have emerged as a promising tool to enhance both surgical precision and functional outcomes in complex robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN). This study aimed to compare perioperative and functional outcomes between two cohorts of patients undergoing RAPN for totally endophytic renal tumors, with and without the use of 3DVMs.

Methods: A retrospective analysis on a prospectively maintained dataset was conducted on 277 patients treated between 2019 and 2022, including 43 who underwent surgery with 3DVM assistance and 234 who relied on conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis using a 2:1 ratio was conducted to reduce selection bias. The primary outcome was achieving the "trifecta". Predictors of trifecta achievement were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: After PSM, 43 patients in the 3DVM group were compared with 86 patients in the control group. Baseline patient- and tumor-related characteristics were similar between groups. Selective clamping was exclusively performed in the 3DVM group (16.3% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Global ischemia time was found significantly shorter in the 3D-guided group (median 10 vs. 14 min; P=0.01). Positive surgical margins (6.9% vs. 7.3%) did not differ significantly. Trifecta was achieved more frequently in the 3DVM group (76.7% vs. 68.2%, P=0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed 3DVMs as an independent predictor of trifecta success (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.12-1.99).

Conclusions: For totally endophytic renal tumors, 3DVM integration facilitated selective clamping and improved trifecta attainment, reinforcing its role in optimizing outcomes in complex nephron-sparing surgery.

背景:三维虚拟模型(3dms)已经成为一种有前途的工具,可以提高复杂机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)的手术精度和功能结果。本研究旨在比较两组接受全内生肾肿瘤RAPN的患者,在使用和不使用3DVMs的情况下的围手术期和功能结局。方法:对2019年至2022年期间接受治疗的277例患者的前瞻性数据集进行回顾性分析,其中43例接受3DVM辅助手术,234例依赖传统二维(2D)成像。采用2:1的比例进行倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,以减少选择偏差。主要成果是实现了“三连冠”。采用多元逻辑回归分析三联体成功的预测因素。结果:PSM后3DVM组43例,对照组86例。两组之间的基线患者和肿瘤相关特征相似。3DVM组只行选择性夹持(16.3% vs. 0%, P=0.01)。3d引导组整体缺血时间明显缩短(中位10分钟vs. 14分钟;P=0.01)。阳性手术切缘(6.9% vs. 7.3%)无显著差异。3DVM组获得三联曲的频率更高(76.7% vs. 68.2%, P=0.04)。多变量分析证实3DVMs是三联体成功的独立预测因子(OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.12-1.99)。结论:对于完全内生的肾肿瘤,3DVM集成有助于选择性夹持和提高三节瓣的实现,加强了其在复杂的保留肾单元手术中优化预后的作用。
{"title":"Three-dimensional virtual model for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in totally endophytic renal tumors: a propensity-score matching analysis with a control group.","authors":"Antonio A Grosso, Fabrizio DI Maida, Luca Lambertini, Giulia Carli, Marco Saladino, Francesco L Conte, Vincenzo Salamone, Francesca Conte, Neliana Kucuku, Filippo Lipparini, Daniele Paganelli, Sofia Giudici, Rino Oriti, Riccardo Fantechi, Matteo Salvi, Gianni Vittori, Andrea Minervini, Andrea Mari","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06516-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06516-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs) have emerged as a promising tool to enhance both surgical precision and functional outcomes in complex robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN). This study aimed to compare perioperative and functional outcomes between two cohorts of patients undergoing RAPN for totally endophytic renal tumors, with and without the use of 3DVMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis on a prospectively maintained dataset was conducted on 277 patients treated between 2019 and 2022, including 43 who underwent surgery with 3DVM assistance and 234 who relied on conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. Propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis using a 2:1 ratio was conducted to reduce selection bias. The primary outcome was achieving the \"trifecta\". Predictors of trifecta achievement were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 43 patients in the 3DVM group were compared with 86 patients in the control group. Baseline patient- and tumor-related characteristics were similar between groups. Selective clamping was exclusively performed in the 3DVM group (16.3% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Global ischemia time was found significantly shorter in the 3D-guided group (median 10 vs. 14 min; P=0.01). Positive surgical margins (6.9% vs. 7.3%) did not differ significantly. Trifecta was achieved more frequently in the 3DVM group (76.7% vs. 68.2%, P=0.04). Multivariate analysis confirmed 3DVMs as an independent predictor of trifecta success (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.12-1.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For totally endophytic renal tumors, 3DVM integration facilitated selective clamping and improved trifecta attainment, reinforcing its role in optimizing outcomes in complex nephron-sparing surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"78 1","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146203793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is it simpler with single-port?. A comparative analysis of single-port robot-assisted simple and radical nephrectomy in a tertiary referral center. 单端口更简单吗?单端口机器人辅助简单和根治性肾切除术在三级转诊中心的比较分析。
IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06476-6
Hakan B Haberal, Valerio Santarelli, Fabio M Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Alexandru Turcan, Flavia Tamborino, Filippo Carletti, Luca Lambertini, Giulio Avesani, Matteo Pacini, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan R Torres-Anguiano, Simone Crivellaro

Background: Simple nephrectomy (SN), a procedure performed for benign kidney conditions, can be more challenging and complicated than radical nephrectomy (RN). With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, robotic platforms have also been introduced for SN. In this study, we aim to compare perioperative outcomes and complications between single-port (SP) robotic-assisted (RA) SN and RN in a tertiary referral center.

Methods: Data from 63 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RASN and SP-RARN between December 2018 and December 2024 at a single center, performed by a single surgeon, were evaluated. We compared baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Results: A total of 33 SP-RARN and 30 SP-RASN were included. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operation time and estimated blood loss (P=0.741, P=0.587, respectively). None of the patients in the SP-RASN group required conversion to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications were observed. In the SP-RASN group, the median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 0.5 (0-1.25) days, and the same-day discharge (SDD) rate was 50%. The numbers of patients with Clavien grade 1 and grade 2 complications for SP-RASN was 3 (10%) and 4 (13.3%), respectively. There was a 0% incidence of major postoperative complications (≥Clavien-Dindo grade 3). LOS, SDD, postoperative complications and readmission rates were similar between groups (P=0.120, P=0.064, P=0.854, P=0.498, respectively).

Conclusions: SP-RASN is a feasible option for the management of benign renal conditions/diseases, offering a low postoperative complication rate and the possibility of SDD.

背景:单纯肾切除术(SN)是一种治疗良性肾脏疾病的手术,比根治性肾切除术(RN)更具挑战性和复杂性。随着微创手术的广泛采用,机器人平台也被引入到手术中。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较单端口(SP)机器人辅助(RA) SN和RN在三级转诊中心的围手术期结果和并发症。方法:对2018年12月至2024年12月在同一中心、由同一位外科医生进行SP-RASN和SP-RARN手术的63例连续患者的数据进行评估。我们比较了患者的基线特征、术中和术后结果。结果:共纳入sp - rann 33例,SP-RASN 30例。两组手术时间和估计失血量差异无统计学意义(P=0.741, P=0.587)。SP-RASN组无患者需转开腹手术,术中无并发症发生。SP-RASN组中位住院时间(LOS)为0.5(0-1.25)天,当日出院率(SDD)为50%。SP-RASN出现Clavien 1级和2级并发症的患者分别为3例(10%)和4例(13.3%)。术后主要并发症发生率为0%(≥Clavien-Dindo 3级)。两组间LOS、SDD、术后并发症及再入院率相似(P=0.120, P=0.064, P=0.854, P=0.498)。结论:SP-RASN是治疗良性肾脏疾病的可行选择,术后并发症发生率低,发生SDD的可能性小。
{"title":"Is it simpler with single-port?. A comparative analysis of single-port robot-assisted simple and radical nephrectomy in a tertiary referral center.","authors":"Hakan B Haberal, Valerio Santarelli, Fabio M Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Alexandru Turcan, Flavia Tamborino, Filippo Carletti, Luca Lambertini, Giulio Avesani, Matteo Pacini, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan R Torres-Anguiano, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06476-6","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06476-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple nephrectomy (SN), a procedure performed for benign kidney conditions, can be more challenging and complicated than radical nephrectomy (RN). With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, robotic platforms have also been introduced for SN. In this study, we aim to compare perioperative outcomes and complications between single-port (SP) robotic-assisted (RA) SN and RN in a tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 63 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RASN and SP-RARN between December 2018 and December 2024 at a single center, performed by a single surgeon, were evaluated. We compared baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 SP-RARN and 30 SP-RASN were included. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of operation time and estimated blood loss (P=0.741, P=0.587, respectively). None of the patients in the SP-RASN group required conversion to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications were observed. In the SP-RASN group, the median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 0.5 (0-1.25) days, and the same-day discharge (SDD) rate was 50%. The numbers of patients with Clavien grade 1 and grade 2 complications for SP-RASN was 3 (10%) and 4 (13.3%), respectively. There was a 0% incidence of major postoperative complications (≥Clavien-Dindo grade 3). LOS, SDD, postoperative complications and readmission rates were similar between groups (P=0.120, P=0.064, P=0.854, P=0.498, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SP-RASN is a feasible option for the management of benign renal conditions/diseases, offering a low postoperative complication rate and the possibility of SDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"63-69"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145071166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1