Pub Date : 2020-10-16DOI: 10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0001
Y. Yiğit
Our study discusses the individual labor law measures that have been taken and their effect on working life Potential problems are addressed due to the outbreak of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) The main effect of compulsory and challenging changes to working life is the danger of redundancies and unemployment, as the production of goods and services shrinks significantly Although some labor legislation measures have been designed to decrease the negative effects of the crisis, they are subject to certain conditions, and not every employee can benefit from this The adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy cannot be eliminated and except for the short-time working allowance (although conditions have been alleviated) due to the temporary legislative regulations introduced (although conditions have been alleviated) cash fee support to those who cannot benefit from this payment has been given In this situation, the employer has the right to suspend labor contracts unilaterally for three months for compelling reasons, therefore the right to terminate employment was restricted, and employers were banned from terminating employment contracts except for ethical and good conduct
{"title":"Bireysel İş Hukuku Açısından Zorlayıcı ve Zorunlu Sebeplere Bağlı Olarak Ortaya Çıkan Çalışma Koşullarının Yeni Koronavirüs (COVID-19) Nedeniyle Gerçekleştirilen Son Yasal Değişiklikler Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi","authors":"Y. Yiğit","doi":"10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0001","url":null,"abstract":"Our study discusses the individual labor law measures that have been taken and their effect on working life Potential problems are addressed due to the outbreak of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) The main effect of compulsory and challenging changes to working life is the danger of redundancies and unemployment, as the production of goods and services shrinks significantly Although some labor legislation measures have been designed to decrease the negative effects of the crisis, they are subject to certain conditions, and not every employee can benefit from this The adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy cannot be eliminated and except for the short-time working allowance (although conditions have been alleviated) due to the temporary legislative regulations introduced (although conditions have been alleviated) cash fee support to those who cannot benefit from this payment has been given In this situation, the employer has the right to suspend labor contracts unilaterally for three months for compelling reasons, therefore the right to terminate employment was restricted, and employers were banned from terminating employment contracts except for ethical and good conduct","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69060499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-16DOI: 10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0011
Ömer Ali Girgin, Sebastian Löw
This comparative study deals with the question of whether travelers can terminate an already booked package tour free of charge after the outbreak of COVID-19 ("coronavirus") in EU law and Turkish law It first provides preliminary information about the regulations related to package tour contracts It explains afterwards, which package travelers have the right of termination and compares the conditions and legal consequences of termination of the contract, under the perspective of EU and Turkish laws In this context, the terms such as unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances, force majeure, the situation that cannot be foreseen and prevented and the reason that not caused by consumer are examined in respect of the COVID-19 pandemic Different results of the cancellation of the package tour or termination of contract are analyzed Also a recent amendment in the directive about the package tour contracts in the Turkish law is criticized
{"title":"Package Tour Contracts in Times of COVID-19","authors":"Ömer Ali Girgin, Sebastian Löw","doi":"10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0011","url":null,"abstract":"This comparative study deals with the question of whether travelers can terminate an already booked package tour free of charge after the outbreak of COVID-19 (\"coronavirus\") in EU law and Turkish law It first provides preliminary information about the regulations related to package tour contracts It explains afterwards, which package travelers have the right of termination and compares the conditions and legal consequences of termination of the contract, under the perspective of EU and Turkish laws In this context, the terms such as unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances, force majeure, the situation that cannot be foreseen and prevented and the reason that not caused by consumer are examined in respect of the COVID-19 pandemic Different results of the cancellation of the package tour or termination of contract are analyzed Also a recent amendment in the directive about the package tour contracts in the Turkish law is criticized","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69060549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-16DOI: 10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0022
Şerife Yildiz Akgül
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has had detrimental effects on legal transactions and public health. The measures taken to prevent the spread of the outbreak have affected the legal regime of contracts for the conduct of public services and public services. Of these contracts, the public service concession contracts are of particular importance. Hence, by undertaking the risks arising from the execution of the service, the contractor who performs the public service is under the obligation to conduct the service in accordance with the principles dominating the public service. In addition to the liabilities of the contractor, the rights of the contractor are also mentioned in the concession agreement. In terms of our subject matter, the principle of the continuity of public services and the right to ask for the protection of the financial balance of the contract is particularly important. The execution of public service concession agreements becomes very difficult and affects the financial balance of the contract due the COVID-19 outbreak. The contractor, who has to perform public service in any case, may request the administration to meet the obligations that he or she has to bear within the framework of the pandemic following the principle of continuity of public services affecting the financial balance of the contract. This study will thus discuss the French administrative law, which is the source country of the Turkish administrative law regarding public service concession agreements, and developments in the European Union law. Then, the instruments that provide the right to demand the protection of the financial balance of the contract granted to the contractor will be presented under unpredictability, force majeure, and fait du prince in the public service concession contracts affected by the COVID-19 outbreak.
{"title":"COVID-19 Salgınının Kamu Hizmeti İmtiyaz Sözleşmelerine Etkisi","authors":"Şerife Yildiz Akgül","doi":"10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.2.0022","url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has had detrimental effects on legal transactions and public health. The measures taken to prevent the spread of the outbreak have affected the legal regime of contracts for the conduct of public services and public services. Of these contracts, the public service concession contracts are of particular importance. Hence, by undertaking the risks arising from the execution of the service, the contractor who performs the public service is under the obligation to conduct the service in accordance with the principles dominating the public service. In addition to the liabilities of the contractor, the rights of the contractor are also mentioned in the concession agreement. In terms of our subject matter, the principle of the continuity of public services and the right to ask for the protection of the financial balance of the contract is particularly important. The execution of public service concession agreements becomes very difficult and affects the financial balance of the contract due the COVID-19 outbreak. The contractor, who has to perform public service in any case, may request the administration to meet the obligations that he or she has to bear within the framework of the pandemic following the principle of continuity of public services affecting the financial balance of the contract. This study will thus discuss the French administrative law, which is the source country of the Turkish administrative law regarding public service concession agreements, and developments in the European Union law. Then, the instruments that provide the right to demand the protection of the financial balance of the contract granted to the contractor will be presented under unpredictability, force majeure, and fait du prince in the public service concession contracts affected by the COVID-19 outbreak.","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47574360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-03-31DOI: 10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.1.0006
A. Şenol, Özge Uzun Kazmaci
The Law on Protection of Soil and Land Use, numbered 5403, aims to protect the unity of agricultural lands, and to prevent the division of the soil with inheritance. This law stipulates first, the possibility regarding the giving over of the agricultural land in succession to one or more heirs, to a family partnership, to a limited liability company or to a third person with the consensus of the heirs and second, in case of disagreement, the judge shall decide whether to leave the agricultural land to a competent heir or to sell the land. Furthermore, according to this law, the competent heir to whom the agricultural land will be left can be determined by means of testamentary disposition. It is possible and also valid within the legal constraints that the testator can also transfer the agricultural land to one of the heirs while he is alive. It is arguable whether this transaction can be considered as the testator’s simulation or not, if this transaction has also been made with a simulated transaction. Some principles are set out by the Supreme Court in terms of the simulation of the testator, and although these principles and decisions are criticized by the doctrine, such cases are held by these principles. The purpose and the regulations of the Law numbered 5403 shall be taken into consideration in determining testator’s simulation.
{"title":"5403 Sayılı Kanun Çerçevesinde Terekedeki Tarım Arazilerinin Devredilmesi Karşısında Muris Muvazaası","authors":"A. Şenol, Özge Uzun Kazmaci","doi":"10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.1.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.1.0006","url":null,"abstract":"The Law on Protection of Soil and Land Use, numbered 5403, aims to protect the unity of agricultural lands, and to prevent the division of the soil with inheritance. This law stipulates first, the possibility regarding the giving over of the agricultural land in succession to one or more heirs, to a family partnership, to a limited liability company or to a third person with the consensus of the heirs and second, in case of disagreement, the judge shall decide whether to leave the agricultural land to a competent heir or to sell the land. Furthermore, according to this law, the competent heir to whom the agricultural land will be left can be determined by means of testamentary disposition. It is possible and also valid within the legal constraints that the testator can also transfer the agricultural land to one of the heirs while he is alive. It is arguable whether this transaction can be considered as the testator’s simulation or not, if this transaction has also been made with a simulated transaction. Some principles are set out by the Supreme Court in terms of the simulation of the testator, and although these principles and decisions are criticized by the doctrine, such cases are held by these principles. The purpose and the regulations of the Law numbered 5403 shall be taken into consideration in determining testator’s simulation.","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47727332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-19DOI: 10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0011
Kürşad Yağcı
Turk Borclar Kanunu’nun (TBK) 117.maddesinin ikinci fikrasina gore, borcun ifa edilecegi gun taraflarca birlikte belirlenmisse, bugunun gecmesiyle borclu temerrude dusmus olur. Bununla birlikte, bazen, borcun, gelecekte gerceklesmesi beklenen bir olgunun gerceklesmesinden itibaren belirli bir surenin gecmesi uzerine muaccel olacagi kararlastirilmis olabilir. Ornegin malin tesliminden itibaren on gun icinde odeme yapilacaginin kararlastirilmasi. Ogretide savunulan klasik goruse gore, belirli vadeden soz edebilmek icin, ifa zamaninin sozlesmenin kuruldugu anda kesin olarak belirli bir tarih veya takvim gunu olarak hesaplanabilir bir sekilde kararlastirilmis olmasi gerekir. Aksi halde borclunun temerrude dusmesi icin alacaklinin borcluya yonelik bir temerrut ihtarinda bulunmasi gerekir. Buna karsilik ogretide savunulan diger bir goruse gore, ifa zamaninin sozlesme kurulduktan sonra ve ifa zamani gelmeden onceki bir tarihte de belirli veya kesin olarak hesaplanabilir hale geldigi hallerde, vade sonradan belirli hale gelmektedir ve bu sebepledir ki temerrut ihtari gerekmez. Yargitay’in ise farkli somut olaylara iliskin iliskin kararlari celiskili olmakla birlikte, ictihatlarinin cogunlugunun, klasik gorus dogrultusunda oldugu gozlemlenmektedir. Ote yandan, sozlesmede kararlastirilan gelecekte gerceklesmesi beklenen olgunun gerceklesmemis olmasi halinde, ifa suresinin nasil hesaplanmasi gerekecegi ve bu hallerde temerrut ihtarina gerek olup olmadigi, degerlendirilmesi gereken diger bir hukuki problemdir. Bu calismada, ogretideki gorusler ve Yargitay uygulamasi cercevesinde konu ele alinmakta ve konuya iliskin kanaatlerimiz ifade edilmektedir.
{"title":"Borcun İfasının, Sözleşmenin Kurulmasından Sonraki Bir Olgunun Gerçekleşmesinden İtibaren Belirli Bir Sürenin Geçmesiyle Muaccel Olacağının Kararlaştırıldığı Hallerde Borçlunun Temerrüde Düşmesi İçin İhtar Şart Mıdır? (Vadenin Sonradan Belirli Hale Gelebilirliği Üzerine)","authors":"Kürşad Yağcı","doi":"10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0011","url":null,"abstract":"Turk Borclar Kanunu’nun (TBK) 117.maddesinin ikinci fikrasina gore, borcun ifa edilecegi gun taraflarca birlikte belirlenmisse, bugunun gecmesiyle borclu temerrude dusmus olur. Bununla birlikte, bazen, borcun, gelecekte gerceklesmesi beklenen bir olgunun gerceklesmesinden itibaren belirli bir surenin gecmesi uzerine muaccel olacagi kararlastirilmis olabilir. Ornegin malin tesliminden itibaren on gun icinde odeme yapilacaginin kararlastirilmasi. Ogretide savunulan klasik goruse gore, belirli vadeden soz edebilmek icin, ifa zamaninin sozlesmenin kuruldugu anda kesin olarak belirli bir tarih veya takvim gunu olarak hesaplanabilir bir sekilde kararlastirilmis olmasi gerekir. Aksi halde borclunun temerrude dusmesi icin alacaklinin borcluya yonelik bir temerrut ihtarinda bulunmasi gerekir. Buna karsilik ogretide savunulan diger bir goruse gore, ifa zamaninin sozlesme kurulduktan sonra ve ifa zamani gelmeden onceki bir tarihte de belirli veya kesin olarak hesaplanabilir hale geldigi hallerde, vade sonradan belirli hale gelmektedir ve bu sebepledir ki temerrut ihtari gerekmez. Yargitay’in ise farkli somut olaylara iliskin iliskin kararlari celiskili olmakla birlikte, ictihatlarinin cogunlugunun, klasik gorus dogrultusunda oldugu gozlemlenmektedir. Ote yandan, sozlesmede kararlastirilan gelecekte gerceklesmesi beklenen olgunun gerceklesmemis olmasi halinde, ifa suresinin nasil hesaplanmasi gerekecegi ve bu hallerde temerrut ihtarina gerek olup olmadigi, degerlendirilmesi gereken diger bir hukuki problemdir. Bu calismada, ogretideki gorusler ve Yargitay uygulamasi cercevesinde konu ele alinmakta ve konuya iliskin kanaatlerimiz ifade edilmektedir.","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47227562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-19DOI: 10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0001
İsmail Cem Soykan
Kambiyo senetlerinde (police, bono veya cekte) cirantanin cirosuna yazacagi ciro yasagi kaydinin hukuki sonucu, 6102 sayili Turk Ticaret Kanunu’nun 685. maddesinin ikinci fikrasinda ve 6762 sayili (mulga) Turk Ticaret Kanunu’nun 597. maddesinin ikinci fikrasinda duzenlenmistir. Bu hukumler policenin cirosuna iliskindir. Ancak bono ve cek hakkinda da uygulanirlar. Her iki hukum de cirantanin policenin tekrar ciro edilmesini yasak edebilecegini ve bu hâlde, senet sonradan kendilerine ciro edilmis olan kisilere karsi sorumlu olmayacagini ongormektedir. Duzenleyenin kambiyo senedine «ciro edilemez» veya «cirosu yasaktir» kaydini yazmasinin hukuki sonucunun ne olacagi hususunda ise gerek 6762 sayili (mulga) Turk Ticaret Kanunu’nda gerek 6102 sayili Turk Ticaret Kanunu’da herhangi bir hukum bulunmamaktadir. Fakat bugun Turk ogretisinin oldukca buyuk bir kismi kambiyo senedine duzenleyen tarafindan yazilan «ciro edilemez» yahut «cirosu yasaktir» kaydinin bir menfi (olumsuz) emre kaydi oldugu gorusundedir. Anilan gorus uyarinca duzenleyenin «ciro edilemez» veya «cirosu yasaktir» kaydini ekleyerek duzenledigi bir kambiyo senedi, nama yazili bir senet olacaktir. Yargitay’in yerlesik ictihadi da bu yaklasimla ayni yondedir. Ancak bizim konu hakkindaki kisisel gorusumuz farklidir. Bu makale, bir kambiyo senedine duzenleyen tarafindan yazilan «ciro edilemez» yahut «cirosu yasaktir» kaydinin hukuki neticesinin ne olduguna iliskin kisisel gorusumuzu aciklamak amaciyla kaleme alinmistir. Makalede oncelikle konu hakkinda ogretide dile getirilen goruslere yer verilmistir. Ardindan sorunla ilgili Yargitay kararlarina deginilmistir. Son olarak, kisisel gorusumuz aciklanmistir.
柬埔寨巡回法庭（警察、bono或夹克）记录的巡回法庭的法律结果是《6102年土耳其-蒂卡雷特法案》第685条。在第二条意见中，《土耳其贸易法》第597条，第6762条。马德西宁的第二个女儿。这些法律与警察巡回法庭有关。但它们也被用于bono和check。她的政治生涯是一个充满活力的时期，她是一个年轻人，也是一个年轻的人。除了在柬埔寨年份写下“电路不能流通”或“电路非法”记录外，《土耳其贸易法》中没有第6102号《土耳其-蒂卡雷特法案》中6762 Sayili（mulga）要求的法律。但今天，土耳其的食人魔在古老的土地上被称为“ciro edilemez”或“cirosu yasaktir”。Anilan gorus uyarinca duzenleyenin“ciro edilemez”或“cirosu yasaktir”kaydini ekleyerek duzenledigi bir kambiyo senedi，nama yazili bir senet olacak。雅吉泰当地政府也采取了同样的做法。-哦，是吗？在这篇文章中，一位名叫“ciro edilemez”或“cirosu yasaktir”的人在一位名叫kissiel gorusumuzu aciklamak amaciyla kaleme alinmistir的老人家中发表了一篇文章。在这篇文章中，血腥被赋予了主题的最高程度。Para as máquinas！最后，我们的皮肤加速了。
{"title":"Kambiyo Senedinin Cirosunun Düzenleyen Tarafından Yasaklanması","authors":"İsmail Cem Soykan","doi":"10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0001","url":null,"abstract":"Kambiyo senetlerinde (police, bono veya cekte) cirantanin cirosuna yazacagi ciro yasagi kaydinin hukuki sonucu, 6102 sayili Turk Ticaret Kanunu’nun 685. maddesinin ikinci fikrasinda ve 6762 sayili (mulga) Turk Ticaret Kanunu’nun 597. maddesinin ikinci fikrasinda duzenlenmistir. Bu hukumler policenin cirosuna iliskindir. Ancak bono ve cek hakkinda da uygulanirlar. Her iki hukum de cirantanin policenin tekrar ciro edilmesini yasak edebilecegini ve bu hâlde, senet sonradan kendilerine ciro edilmis olan kisilere karsi sorumlu olmayacagini ongormektedir. Duzenleyenin kambiyo senedine «ciro edilemez» veya «cirosu yasaktir» kaydini yazmasinin hukuki sonucunun ne olacagi hususunda ise gerek 6762 sayili (mulga) Turk Ticaret Kanunu’nda gerek 6102 sayili Turk Ticaret Kanunu’da herhangi bir hukum bulunmamaktadir. Fakat bugun Turk ogretisinin oldukca buyuk bir kismi kambiyo senedine duzenleyen tarafindan yazilan «ciro edilemez» yahut «cirosu yasaktir» kaydinin bir menfi (olumsuz) emre kaydi oldugu gorusundedir. Anilan gorus uyarinca duzenleyenin «ciro edilemez» veya «cirosu yasaktir» kaydini ekleyerek duzenledigi bir kambiyo senedi, nama yazili bir senet olacaktir. Yargitay’in yerlesik ictihadi da bu yaklasimla ayni yondedir. Ancak bizim konu hakkindaki kisisel gorusumuz farklidir. Bu makale, bir kambiyo senedine duzenleyen tarafindan yazilan «ciro edilemez» yahut «cirosu yasaktir» kaydinin hukuki neticesinin ne olduguna iliskin kisisel gorusumuzu aciklamak amaciyla kaleme alinmistir. Makalede oncelikle konu hakkinda ogretide dile getirilen goruslere yer verilmistir. Ardindan sorunla ilgili Yargitay kararlarina deginilmistir. Son olarak, kisisel gorusumuz aciklanmistir.","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69060152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-19DOI: 10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0003
Arzu Genç Aridemir, Sanem Aksoy Dursun
Payli mulkiyet konusu esyanin paydaslari tarafindan nasil kullanilacagi, yonetilecegi ile ilgili hukuki islemler yapabilirler. Paydaslar malin kullanimi ve yonetimi icin aralarinda anlasmalar yapabilir, bu konuda kararlar alabilirler. Uyusmazlik halinde paydaslar mahkemeye basvurup karar aldirabilirler. Paydaslarin yaptigi hukuki islemlerin payi sonradan kazananlar acisindan baglayici olup olmayacagi onemli bir sorundur. Paydaslarin yaptigi bu duzenlemelerin payi sonradan kazananlar acisindan baglayici olmasi icin serh edilmesi gerektigi kanunda ongorulmektedir (TMK m.695). Yonetim anlasmalarinin serh edilmeleri 4721 sayili Turk Medeni Kanun ile ilk defa hukukumuza girmistir. Payli mulkiyet konusu esyanin veya payin ucuncu kisiye devredilmesi halinde, paydaslar arasindaki mevcut yararlanma, kullanma veya yonetime iliskin anlasmalarin ucuncu kisiye karsi ileri surulememesi, uygulamada sorunlarin ortaya cikmasina sebep olmaktaydi. MK m.689/ son ile MK m.695 hukumleri bu ihtiyaci gidermek uzere duzenlenmistir. Şerh ile ilgili bircok hukuki sorun bulunmaktadir. Paydaslarin yaptigi hangi duzenlemelerin serh edilebilecegi bunlardan biridir. Sinirli sayi ilkesinin gecerli oldugu esya hukuku sisteminde paydaslarin yaptigi duzenlemelerin serhinin hukuki niteligi incelemenin baslica konusudur. Şerhin kosullari ve etkisi hususlari bu incelemede irdelenmektedir.
{"title":"Paylı Mülkiyete Tabi Bir Taşınmazda Paydaşların Yararlanma, Kullanma ve Yönetime İlişkin Hukuki İşlemlerinin Şerhi","authors":"Arzu Genç Aridemir, Sanem Aksoy Dursun","doi":"10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0003","url":null,"abstract":"Payli mulkiyet konusu esyanin paydaslari tarafindan nasil kullanilacagi, yonetilecegi ile ilgili hukuki islemler yapabilirler. Paydaslar malin kullanimi ve yonetimi icin aralarinda anlasmalar yapabilir, bu konuda kararlar alabilirler. Uyusmazlik halinde paydaslar mahkemeye basvurup karar aldirabilirler. Paydaslarin yaptigi hukuki islemlerin payi sonradan kazananlar acisindan baglayici olup olmayacagi onemli bir sorundur. Paydaslarin yaptigi bu duzenlemelerin payi sonradan kazananlar acisindan baglayici olmasi icin serh edilmesi gerektigi kanunda ongorulmektedir (TMK m.695). Yonetim anlasmalarinin serh edilmeleri 4721 sayili Turk Medeni Kanun ile ilk defa hukukumuza girmistir. Payli mulkiyet konusu esyanin veya payin ucuncu kisiye devredilmesi halinde, paydaslar arasindaki mevcut yararlanma, kullanma veya yonetime iliskin anlasmalarin ucuncu kisiye karsi ileri surulememesi, uygulamada sorunlarin ortaya cikmasina sebep olmaktaydi. MK m.689/ son ile MK m.695 hukumleri bu ihtiyaci gidermek uzere duzenlenmistir. Şerh ile ilgili bircok hukuki sorun bulunmaktadir. Paydaslarin yaptigi hangi duzenlemelerin serh edilebilecegi bunlardan biridir. Sinirli sayi ilkesinin gecerli oldugu esya hukuku sisteminde paydaslarin yaptigi duzenlemelerin serhinin hukuki niteligi incelemenin baslica konusudur. Şerhin kosullari ve etkisi hususlari bu incelemede irdelenmektedir.","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69060251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-19DOI: 10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0007
Cemil Güner
Futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinin amaci, futbol menajerinin bir futbolcu ile kulup arasinda imzalanan profesyonel futbolcu sozlesmesi ya da iki kulup arasinda imzalanan transfer anlasmasi yapilmasi konusunda hizmet vermektir. Bu baglamda, taraflarca akdedilen yabanci unsurlu futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden bircok uyusmazlik gundeme gelebilecektir. Futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden dogan yabanci unsurlu bir uyusmazlik icin taraflar, devlet mahkemelerinde dava acabilecekleri gibi Spor Tahkim Mahkemesine (CAS) de basvurabilirler. Bununla birlikte, futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden dogan bir uyusmazlik yabanci unsurlu ise Turkiye Futbol Federasyonu Uyusmazlik Cozum Kuruluna goturulmesi mumkun degildir. Zira Turkiye Futbol Federasyonu Statusu md 63/3’de uluslararasi ihtilaflarda Uluslararasi Futbol Federasyonlari Birligi’nin (FIFA) yetkili oldugu acikca hukme baglanmistir. Yabanci unsurlu futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden dogan bir uyusmazlik Spor Tahkim Mahkemesine goturulurse, hakem heyeti, uyusmazligin esasina taraflarca tahkim sartinda veya tahkim anlasmasinda secilen hukuk kurallarini, boyle bir secimin yapilmamasi halinde ise Isvicre hukukunu uygular. Taraflar hakem heyetine hakkaniyete gore karar verme yetkisi de taniyabilirler. Soz konusu uyusmazlik Turk mahkemelerinde dava konusu edilirse, uygulanacak hukuk mahkemece yapilacak vasiflandirmaya gore degisebilir. Buna gore, taraflar futbol menajerligi sozlesmesini is sozlesmesi unsurlariyla yapmislarsa uygulanacak hukuk MOHUK md 27’e gore tayin edilir. Ancak taraflar futbol menajerligi sozlesmesini vekâlet sozlesmesi, simsarlik sozlesmesi, komisyon sozlesmesi veya danismanlik sozlesmesi unsurlariyla yapmislarsa uygulanacak hukuk MOHUK md 24 uyarinca belirlenir.
足球经理的目标是提供职业足球休息时间，由足球经理和足球运动员签署，或由两支球队签署转会说明。在这种情况下，受到排挤的外国足球管理层将能够发起一系列不恰当的行动。足球管理引起的外国不服从也可以适用于体育司法法院（CAS），也可以在国家法院起诉。尽管如此，将土耳其足球联合会介绍给科祖姆基金会并不有趣，这是足球管理失败的自然障碍。土耳其兹拉联合国足球联合会（United Nations Football Federation of Zira Turkey）已被国际足球联合会裁定发生63/3起国际冲突。如果斯波尔塔金法院对外国足球管理层的违规行为进行了强制执行，则在战术法庭或智力法庭对其进行解释的范围内，伊斯维克雷法律应基本适用于法院的违规行为。他们还可以承认评判政府的权力。如果土耳其法院不遵守规定，法院可以向检方提起上诉。布娜·戈尔，塔拉弗拉尔·富特博尔·梅纳杰里吉·索兹勒斯梅西尼是索兹勒斯梅西·乌兹勒斯里伊拉·亚普米斯拉萨·维吾拉纳克·胡库·莫胡克·md 27’e gore tayin edilir。然而，如果当事方进行了足球管理绑架、欺诈、委托绑架或舞蹈绑架，则MOHUK的法律将以24条执行条款为基础。
{"title":"Yabancı Unsurlu Futbol Menajerliği Sözleşmesinden Doğan Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları ve Uygulanacak Hukuk","authors":"Cemil Güner","doi":"10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/MECMUA.2019.77.1.0007","url":null,"abstract":"Futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinin amaci, futbol menajerinin bir futbolcu ile kulup arasinda imzalanan profesyonel futbolcu sozlesmesi ya da iki kulup arasinda imzalanan transfer anlasmasi yapilmasi konusunda hizmet vermektir. Bu baglamda, taraflarca akdedilen yabanci unsurlu futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden bircok uyusmazlik gundeme gelebilecektir. Futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden dogan yabanci unsurlu bir uyusmazlik icin taraflar, devlet mahkemelerinde dava acabilecekleri gibi Spor Tahkim Mahkemesine (CAS) de basvurabilirler. Bununla birlikte, futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden dogan bir uyusmazlik yabanci unsurlu ise Turkiye Futbol Federasyonu Uyusmazlik Cozum Kuruluna goturulmesi mumkun degildir. Zira Turkiye Futbol Federasyonu Statusu md 63/3’de uluslararasi ihtilaflarda Uluslararasi Futbol Federasyonlari Birligi’nin (FIFA) yetkili oldugu acikca hukme baglanmistir. Yabanci unsurlu futbol menajerligi sozlesmesinden dogan bir uyusmazlik Spor Tahkim Mahkemesine goturulurse, hakem heyeti, uyusmazligin esasina taraflarca tahkim sartinda veya tahkim anlasmasinda secilen hukuk kurallarini, boyle bir secimin yapilmamasi halinde ise Isvicre hukukunu uygular. Taraflar hakem heyetine hakkaniyete gore karar verme yetkisi de taniyabilirler. Soz konusu uyusmazlik Turk mahkemelerinde dava konusu edilirse, uygulanacak hukuk mahkemece yapilacak vasiflandirmaya gore degisebilir. Buna gore, taraflar futbol menajerligi sozlesmesini is sozlesmesi unsurlariyla yapmislarsa uygulanacak hukuk MOHUK md 27’e gore tayin edilir. Ancak taraflar futbol menajerligi sozlesmesini vekâlet sozlesmesi, simsarlik sozlesmesi, komisyon sozlesmesi veya danismanlik sozlesmesi unsurlariyla yapmislarsa uygulanacak hukuk MOHUK md 24 uyarinca belirlenir.","PeriodicalId":53728,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69060632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：