In the face of rapid neoliberal globalization and climate change, agricultural communities across the globe have demonstrated creative ways to adapt and build resilience. Many of the articles collected in this volume are based on ethnographic research conducted in regions deemed peripheral from the standpoint of national and global markets—the Aysén region in Chile, the Parry Sound District in Ontario, rural Oaxacan villages impacted by labor outmigration, and pastoral communities in the Peruvian Andes. Others focus on regions recognized as central to agricultural production strategies at a national level—Indiana row-crop country and Alsatian vineyards. In both settings, the authors highlight the voices of people (or more-than-human actors) whose expertise and perspectives are frequently overlooked in both scholarship and policy processes. Together, these articles provide rich regional perspectives on how farmers, pastoralists, and non-human organisms contribute knowledge and labor within complex food production systems to make producer communities more resilient in the face of transition. Some of the articles also identify specific circumstantial barriers that explain why these actors/producers do not receive due recognition.
In, “Challenging Gendered Assumptions of Expertise in Pastoralist Development in the Peruvian Andes,” Allison Caine explores why women’s grounded expertise is ignored in development discourse, despite the fact that women’s knowledge could help us understand adaptation to local climate change. Caine shows that in development initiatives, this exclusion is not just a consequence of women’s lack of participation but is systematically embedded in the design and implementation of the development training programs and materials themselves. Due to the use of different linguistic registers, the legibility of women’s expertise is not recorded. Caine’s goal is to underscore women’s efforts in climate adaptability.
In Sanitary Crises and “No Contact” Aquaculture: Chilean Fish Farming During the Pandemic, Eric H. Thomas investigates the effects of COVID-19 on the industrial aquaculture sector in Southern Chile. Framing recent events within his long-term research in the Aysén region and the history of past crises impacting salmon aquaculture (e.g., sea lice and bacterial disease outbreaks), Thomas argues that COVID-19 should be viewed as a profoundly disruptive disaster, rather than a temporary crisis that can easily be solved. The pandemic reveals the ways that salmon aquaculture contributes very little to local livelihoods in remote coastal communities. Thomas explores the political and economic tensions exposed by the pandemic and provides insight into how anthropologists can investigate disasters as they unfold.
Nicholas C. Kawa draws on participant observation and interviews to examine farmer adoption of soil conservation methods in A “Win-Win” for Soil Conservation? How Indiana Row-Crop Farmer