{"title":"Evidence on the Need for an Integrated Approach to the Management of Diabetes: The Diagnostic Perspective if Osteomyelitis is Suspected.","authors":"B R Saleem","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37698815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C Setacci, D Benevento, G De Donato, E Viviani, U M Bracale, L Del Guercio, G Palasciano, F Setacci
Foot ulcers associated with Diabetes mellitus require immediate attention due to risk of amputation if left untreated. Herein we focus on the mitigating risk factors and physiopathology of the diabetic foot, recounting our own surgical approach and revascularization procedures.
{"title":"Focusing on Diabetic Ulcers.","authors":"C Setacci, D Benevento, G De Donato, E Viviani, U M Bracale, L Del Guercio, G Palasciano, F Setacci","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Foot ulcers associated with Diabetes mellitus require immediate attention due to risk of amputation if left untreated. Herein we focus on the mitigating risk factors and physiopathology of the diabetic foot, recounting our own surgical approach and revascularization procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039261/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37698813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
E Dinoto, F Pecoraro, D Mirabella, F Ferlito, A Farina, N Lo Biundo, P Orlando-Conti, G Bajardi
Diabetic ulceration of the foot is a major global medical, social and economic problem and is the most frequent end-point of diabetic complications. A retrospective analysis from February 2017 to May 2019 of diabetic patients presenting below-the-knee artery disease (PAD) was carried out. Only patients treated with endovascular techniques as first choice treatment were evaluated. Outcome measured was perioperative mortality and morbidity. Freedom from occlusion, secondary patency and amputation rate were all registered. Additional maneuvers including stenting or angioplasty with drug eluting balloon (DEB) were reported. A total of 167 (101 male/66 female) patients with a mean age of 71 years were included in the study. A Rutherford 3, 4, 5 and 6 categories were reported in 5, 7, 110 and 45 patients, respectively. No perioperative mortality was reported. Morbidity occurred in 4 (4.4%) cases and consisted of pseudoaneurysm. Additional stenting during first procedure was required in 7 (4%) patients, drug eluting balloon was needed in 56 (33%) patients. At 1-year follow-up, estimated freedom from occlusion and secondary patency was 70% and 80% respectively. Major amputation rate was 2.4%, minor amputation rate was 41.9%. In our experience, extreme revascularization in search of distal direct flow reduce the rate of amputations with an increase in ulcer healing. New materials and techniques such as drug eluting technology, used properly, can improve outcome.
{"title":"A Single-Center Experience on Below-The-Knee Endovascular Treatment in Diabetic Patients.","authors":"E Dinoto, F Pecoraro, D Mirabella, F Ferlito, A Farina, N Lo Biundo, P Orlando-Conti, G Bajardi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic ulceration of the foot is a major global medical, social and economic problem and is the most frequent end-point of diabetic complications. A retrospective analysis from February 2017 to May 2019 of diabetic patients presenting below-the-knee artery disease (PAD) was carried out. Only patients treated with endovascular techniques as first choice treatment were evaluated. Outcome measured was perioperative mortality and morbidity. Freedom from occlusion, secondary patency and amputation rate were all registered. Additional maneuvers including stenting or angioplasty with drug eluting balloon (DEB) were reported. A total of 167 (101 male/66 female) patients with a mean age of 71 years were included in the study. A Rutherford 3, 4, 5 and 6 categories were reported in 5, 7, 110 and 45 patients, respectively. No perioperative mortality was reported. Morbidity occurred in 4 (4.4%) cases and consisted of pseudoaneurysm. Additional stenting during first procedure was required in 7 (4%) patients, drug eluting balloon was needed in 56 (33%) patients. At 1-year follow-up, estimated freedom from occlusion and secondary patency was 70% and 80% respectively. Major amputation rate was 2.4%, minor amputation rate was 41.9%. In our experience, extreme revascularization in search of distal direct flow reduce the rate of amputations with an increase in ulcer healing. New materials and techniques such as drug eluting technology, used properly, can improve outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039268/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37698818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Rizzo, A. D'andrea, N. Stella, P. Orlando, M. Taurino
Notwithstanding technological improvements in endovascular devices treatment of steno-obstructive lesions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) remains a challenge for today’s vascular surgeon. Current opinion dictates that the diabetic population may have worse outcome after revascularization of the lower extremities. Herein we examine the effects of endovascular treatment on steno-obstructive lesions of the SFA in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on 110 patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of the SFA from 2010 to 2017 comparing outcomes in diabetic (DM) vs non-diabetic patients (nDM). Results 56 (50.9%) of the patients were diabetic and 54 were non-diabetic (49.1%). 52.7% (62.7% DM vs 35.2% nDM, p = 0.0003) were patients with critical limb ischemia. SFA occlusion was present in 65.5% (60.7% DM vs 70.4% nDM, p = 0.29) of all patients. All had undergone PTA of the SFA and 40.9% had received adjunctive stenting (44.6% DM vs 37.0% nDM, p = 0.41). A multilevel treatment was executed in 39.1% (51.8% DM vs 25.9% nDM) of the cases whereas an infra-popliteal procedure was associated in 27.3% (37.5% DM vs 16.7% nDM). In both groups the presence of diabetes was significantly associated (p = 0.005 e p = 0.014, respectively). Reintervention rate was 22.7%; 13 in the diabetic group (23.2%) and 12 in the non-diabetic group (22.2%). Of those who had had reintervention (p = 0.77); 9 patients (8.2%) had undergone an open surgical operation, 6 of whom had diabetes (p = 0.32). 5 patients (4.5%) had had major amputation, 4 of whom were diabetic (p = 0.20). Curves assessing freedom from target lesion restenosis were substantially overlapping between the two groups. Conclusion No statistical associations between diabetes and reintervention or amputation rates were found. Indication to treat the SFA were not influenced by the presence of diabetes but further investigation is required to verify our hypothesis.
尽管血管内装置的技术有所改进,但股浅动脉狭窄梗阻性病变的治疗仍然是当今血管外科医生面临的挑战。目前的观点表明,糖尿病人群在下肢血运重建后可能会有更糟糕的结果。在此,我们研究了血管内治疗对糖尿病和非糖尿病患者SFA狭窄梗阻性病变的影响。方法对2010年至2017年接受SFA血管内治疗的110名患者进行回顾性分析,比较糖尿病(DM)和非糖尿病(nDM)患者的疗效。结果糖尿病患者56例(50.9%),非糖尿病患者54例(49.1%),严重肢体缺血患者占52.7%(62.7%DM vs 35.2%nDM,p=0.0003)。在所有患者中,65.5%(60.7%DM vs 70.4%nDM,p=0.29)存在SFA闭塞。所有患者都接受了SFA的PTA,40.9%的患者接受了辅助支架植入术(44.6%的DM对37.0%的DM,p=0.41)。39.1%(51.8%的DM对25.9%的DM)的患者进行了多级治疗,27.3%(37.5%的DM对16.7%的DM)患者进行了腘下手术。在这两组中,糖尿病的存在显著相关(p分别为0.005和0.014)。重返社会率为22.7%;糖尿病组13例(23.2%),非糖尿病组12例(22.2%);9名患者(8.2%)接受了开放性外科手术,其中6人患有糖尿病(p=0.32)。5名患者(4.5%)进行了大截肢,其中4人患有糖尿病,p=0.20。评估靶病变再狭窄自由度的曲线在两组之间基本重叠。结论糖尿病与再干预率或截肢率之间无统计学相关性。治疗SFA的适应症不受糖尿病的影响,但需要进一步的研究来验证我们的假设。
{"title":"The Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on the Outcome of Superficial Femoral Artery Recanalization is Debatable","authors":"L. Rizzo, A. D'andrea, N. Stella, P. Orlando, M. Taurino","doi":"10.14273/UNISA-2809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14273/UNISA-2809","url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding technological improvements in endovascular devices treatment of steno-obstructive lesions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) remains a challenge for today’s vascular surgeon. Current opinion dictates that the diabetic population may have worse outcome after revascularization of the lower extremities. Herein we examine the effects of endovascular treatment on steno-obstructive lesions of the SFA in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on 110 patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of the SFA from 2010 to 2017 comparing outcomes in diabetic (DM) vs non-diabetic patients (nDM). Results 56 (50.9%) of the patients were diabetic and 54 were non-diabetic (49.1%). 52.7% (62.7% DM vs 35.2% nDM, p = 0.0003) were patients with critical limb ischemia. SFA occlusion was present in 65.5% (60.7% DM vs 70.4% nDM, p = 0.29) of all patients. All had undergone PTA of the SFA and 40.9% had received adjunctive stenting (44.6% DM vs 37.0% nDM, p = 0.41). A multilevel treatment was executed in 39.1% (51.8% DM vs 25.9% nDM) of the cases whereas an infra-popliteal procedure was associated in 27.3% (37.5% DM vs 16.7% nDM). In both groups the presence of diabetes was significantly associated (p = 0.005 e p = 0.014, respectively). Reintervention rate was 22.7%; 13 in the diabetic group (23.2%) and 12 in the non-diabetic group (22.2%). Of those who had had reintervention (p = 0.77); 9 patients (8.2%) had undergone an open surgical operation, 6 of whom had diabetes (p = 0.32). 5 patients (4.5%) had had major amputation, 4 of whom were diabetic (p = 0.20). Curves assessing freedom from target lesion restenosis were substantially overlapping between the two groups. Conclusion No statistical associations between diabetes and reintervention or amputation rates were found. Indication to treat the SFA were not influenced by the presence of diabetes but further investigation is required to verify our hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45043141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R P Ammollo, A Petrone, A M Giribono, L Ferrante, L Del Guercio, U M Bracale
Background: Flebogrif® (Balton, Poland) is a novel mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) device for saphenous vein insufficiency. It combines endothelial damage performed by radial retractable cutting hooks together with chemical ablation through sclerosant injection of 3% polidocanol foam according to its IFU. The objective of this study is to evaluate Flebogrif's efficacy in terms of recanalization rate and recurrence by varying polidocanol foam concentrations.
Methods: We performed 24 MOCAs on 23 patients with Flebogrif® between January and May 2019. In 12 cases the polidocanol foam was prepared at a 3% concentration, and in another 12 at 1.5%. Great saphenous vein (GSV) recanalization and truncular recurrence were evaluated at 1 and 3 months with a Duplex Ultrasound Anatomy (DUS) examination.
Results: At 1- and 3-month follow-ups, none of the 14 patients treated with the polidocanol 3% foam were observed to have had great saphenous vein GSV recanalization and truncular recurrence. Only 2 of the 14 (14.3%) cases treated with polidocanol 1.5% foam showed evidence of recanalization within the first centimetres from the sapheno-femoral junction (p > .05). All patients experienced clinical benefits without recurrence of symptoms.
Conclusion: MOCA with Flebogrif® is a safe, relatively inexpensive and effective alternative to standard methods in the treatment of saphenous insufficiency with encouraging short-term results. Despite our relatively small patient sample, no statistical significance in evidence of recurrence in the group of patients treated with 3% foam and those treated with 1.5% foam was noted. Longer term analysis of GSV patency and recurrence is necessary to further evaluate Flebogrif's impact and actual indications in the treatment of chronic venous disease.
{"title":"Early Results of Mechanochemical Ablation with Flebogrif® in great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: does Polidocanol Concentration Affect Outcome?","authors":"R P Ammollo, A Petrone, A M Giribono, L Ferrante, L Del Guercio, U M Bracale","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flebogrif® (Balton, Poland) is a novel mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) device for saphenous vein insufficiency. It combines endothelial damage performed by radial retractable cutting hooks together with chemical ablation through sclerosant injection of 3% polidocanol foam according to its IFU. The objective of this study is to evaluate Flebogrif's efficacy in terms of recanalization rate and recurrence by varying polidocanol foam concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed 24 MOCAs on 23 patients with Flebogrif® between January and May 2019. In 12 cases the polidocanol foam was prepared at a 3% concentration, and in another 12 at 1.5%. Great saphenous vein (GSV) recanalization and truncular recurrence were evaluated at 1 and 3 months with a Duplex Ultrasound Anatomy (DUS) examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1- and 3-month follow-ups, none of the 14 patients treated with the polidocanol 3% foam were observed to have had great saphenous vein GSV recanalization and truncular recurrence. Only 2 of the 14 (14.3%) cases treated with polidocanol 1.5% foam showed evidence of recanalization within the first centimetres from the sapheno-femoral junction (p > .05). All patients experienced clinical benefits without recurrence of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MOCA with Flebogrif® is a safe, relatively inexpensive and effective alternative to standard methods in the treatment of saphenous insufficiency with encouraging short-term results. Despite our relatively small patient sample, no statistical significance in evidence of recurrence in the group of patients treated with 3% foam and those treated with 1.5% foam was noted. Longer term analysis of GSV patency and recurrence is necessary to further evaluate Flebogrif's impact and actual indications in the treatment of chronic venous disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039266/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37698715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
New digital technologies can have a huge impact on the traditional healthcare sector, both from a clinical and economic perspective. Doctors and health specialists will increasingly need technology to improve the services they provide to their patients. Here a novel patented device for automatic processing of clinical data of chronic poly-pathological patients is presented. The invention consists of a reconfigurable equipment that allows the assessment of clinical risk severity indexes that can be customized for polypathological patients and which acts both as a decision support system for specialist doctors in the diagnosis and treatment phases, and as a monitoring system in the clinical environment.
{"title":"Digital Innovation in Healthcare: A Device with A Method for Monitoring, Managing and Preventing the Risk of Chronic Polypathological Patients.","authors":"G Improta, V De Luca, M Illario, M Triassi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New digital technologies can have a huge impact on the traditional healthcare sector, both from a clinical and economic perspective. Doctors and health specialists will increasingly need technology to improve the services they provide to their patients. Here a novel patented device for automatic processing of clinical data of chronic poly-pathological patients is presented. The invention consists of a reconfigurable equipment that allows the assessment of clinical risk severity indexes that can be customized for polypathological patients and which acts both as a decision support system for specialist doctors in the diagnosis and treatment phases, and as a monitoring system in the clinical environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039264/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37698718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M Maisto, L Ferrante, A M Giribono, M Sodo, M Panagrosso, A Peluso, L Del Guercio, U M Bracale
Surgical access complications during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are reported relatively frequent. HARMONIC FOCUS® (HF; Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) is a device developed to improve bleeding control and reduce heat-related damage stemming from surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of HF versus conventional haemostasis with electrocautery, both techniques used in the same patient. Five patients developed bilateral wound's thickening (13.9%) demonstrated at the CT scan, two of whom had no clinical manifestation while in three cases the thickening was associated with lymphocele (4.54%), 2 of which were in the side where the EC was used (5.5%), and 1 case (2.7%), in the HF applied side. One isolated lymphocele occurred at the left groin (2.7%) (tables n.2-3). A Fisher's exact test was conducted between EC and HF on the occurrence of wound healing complications (3/36 for EC and 1/36 for HF) that resulted statistically significant at p<0.05. Focus Harmonic Scalpel has certain advantages than conventional haemostasis in avoiding surgical access complications.
{"title":"Harmonic Focus Versus Conventional Electrocautery for Femoral Artery Exposure: a \"Direct\" Comparison on the Same Patients.","authors":"M Maisto, L Ferrante, A M Giribono, M Sodo, M Panagrosso, A Peluso, L Del Guercio, U M Bracale","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical access complications during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are reported relatively frequent. HARMONIC FOCUS<sup>®</sup> (HF; Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) is a device developed to improve bleeding control and reduce heat-related damage stemming from surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of HF versus conventional haemostasis with electrocautery, both techniques used in the same patient. Five patients developed bilateral wound's thickening (13.9%) demonstrated at the CT scan, two of whom had no clinical manifestation while in three cases the thickening was associated with lymphocele (4.54%), 2 of which were in the side where the EC was used (5.5%), and 1 case (2.7%), in the HF applied side. One isolated lymphocele occurred at the left groin (2.7%) (tables n.2-3). A Fisher's exact test was conducted between EC and HF on the occurrence of wound healing complications (3/36 for EC and 1/36 for HF) that resulted statistically significant at p<0.05. Focus Harmonic Scalpel has certain advantages than conventional haemostasis in avoiding surgical access complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7039272/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37698817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Withholding and withdrawing in real life.","authors":"O Piazza","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350778/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36973418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
U M Bracale, M Di Filippo, A De Capua, L Vanni, D Narese, F Pecoraro, A M Giribono, R Bracale
Angioplasty with drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an emerging and reliable method for the treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions. We report our experience with the Stellarex™ DCB in the first 50 patients.
Methods: From July 2015 to November 2017, 50 patients (41 M, 9F), medium age (64 ± 7.4 year) were subject to 33 angioplasties (PTAs) for femoro-popliteal lesions with a paclitaxel-coated balloon (Stellarex™). Based upon clinical data sixteen patients had severe claudication (56% - Rutherford class 3); ten patients suffered from ischemic rest pain (34% - Rutherford class 4); and five presented minor tissue loss (10% - Rutherford class 5). 42% of patients showed femoro-popliteal lesion TASC-II B, and 58% presented lesions pertaining to TASC-II C.
Results: Immediate technical success was 100% without perioperative complications. Primary patency rate was 94% at twelve months. In three cases restenosis (6%) was detected within a year from procedure, and a further PTA DCB was performed with primary assisted patency rates of 100% at twelve months. Two patients underwent major lower limb amputation. Three patients died during follow-up and one patient was lost at follow-up.
Conclusion: DCB angioplasty with Stellarex™ is a viable alternative to traditional endovascular procedures proving satisfactory primary patency rates at twelve months. Based on our experience, treatment with DCB is a first choice technique for non-complex de novo lesions of the femoro - popliteal tract.
药物包被球囊血管成形术(DCB)是一种新兴的、可靠的治疗股腘窝病变的方法。我们报告了我们在前50名患者中使用Stellarex™DCB的经验。方法:2015年7月至2017年11月,采用紫杉醇包被球囊(Stellarex™)对50例(41 M, 9F)中年龄(64±7.4岁)患者行33例股骨-腘动脉病变血管成形术(pta)。根据临床资料,16例患者有严重跛行(56% - Rutherford分类3);10例患者出现缺血性休息痛(34% - Rutherford分类4);42%的患者表现为股腘窝TASC-II B型病变,58%的患者表现为TASC-II c型病变。结果:立即技术成功率为100%,无围手术期并发症。12个月时原发性通畅率为94%。其中3例(6%)在手术后一年内发现再狭窄,并在12个月时进行了PTA DCB,主要辅助通畅率为100%。2例患者行下肢大截肢。3例患者在随访中死亡,1例患者在随访中丢失。结论:采用Stellarex™的DCB血管成形术是传统血管内手术的可行替代方案,在12个月时具有令人满意的初级通畅率。根据我们的经验,DCB治疗是非复杂的股腘束新发病变的首选技术。
{"title":"Treatment of <i>de novo</i> femoro-popliteal lesions with a new Drug Coated Balloon: early experience of a single Center in the first 50 patients.","authors":"U M Bracale, M Di Filippo, A De Capua, L Vanni, D Narese, F Pecoraro, A M Giribono, R Bracale","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Angioplasty with drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an emerging and reliable method for the treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions. We report our experience with the Stellarex™ DCB in the first 50 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2015 to November 2017, 50 patients (41 M, 9F), medium age (64 ± 7.4 year) were subject to 33 angioplasties (PTAs) for femoro-popliteal lesions with a paclitaxel-coated balloon (Stellarex™). Based upon clinical data sixteen patients had severe claudication (56% - Rutherford class 3); ten patients suffered from ischemic rest pain (34% - Rutherford class 4); and five presented minor tissue loss (10% - Rutherford class 5). 42% of patients showed femoro-popliteal lesion TASC-II B, and 58% presented lesions pertaining to TASC-II C.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immediate technical success was 100% without perioperative complications. Primary patency rate was 94% at twelve months. In three cases restenosis (6%) was detected within a year from procedure, and a further PTA DCB was performed with primary assisted patency rates of 100% at twelve months. Two patients underwent major lower limb amputation. Three patients died during follow-up and one patient was lost at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCB angioplasty with Stellarex™ is a viable alternative to traditional endovascular procedures proving satisfactory primary patency rates at twelve months. Based on our experience, treatment with DCB is a first choice technique for non-complex <i>de novo</i> lesions of the femoro - popliteal tract.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36973419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
[This corrects the article on p. 25 in vol. 17, PMID: 30083520.].
[这是对第17卷第25页文章的更正,PMID: 30083520]。
{"title":"Errata corrige.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article on p. 25 in vol. 17, PMID: 30083520.].</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2019-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36973420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}