Diseases of the Esophagus最新文献

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus that affects both children and adults. Symptoms in adults are mainly esophageal dysphagia, which ranges from mild symptoms to acute food bolus obstruction of the esophagus. Diagnosis is defined as symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥ 15 eosinophils/high power field (HPF) in at least one of the biopsies taken from the esophagus. EoE appears to be increasing in both prevalence and incidence. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, incidence, and presenting symptoms of patients with EoE within the catchment area of Northern Älvsborg County Hospital in Trollhättan. Patient records with the ICD code of EoE between 2012 and 2022 and pathology reports from esophageal biopsies from 2000-2022 were examined. Patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and > 15 eosinophils/HPF were classified as having EoE. In total, 409 EoE patients (379 adults and 30 children) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria during the follow-up period. The overall prevalence was 113 cases/100 000 inhabitants (adults 127/100 000 and children 57/100 000) at 31 December 2022. The incidence was 7/100 000 and increased during the observation period. At diagnosis, 46% of the adults and 11% of the children had a history of acute bolus obstruction requiring hospitalization, while 51% of adults and 22% of children exhibited endoscopic findings of fibrosis. The prevalence of EoE is significantly higher than that generally reported in an area of southwest Sweden. The results indicate that the incidence is increasing; however, whether this is due to an actual increase or heightened awareness of EoE is inconclusive. Acute bolus obstruction is a common presenting symptom among EoE patients and is most likely an effect of late diagnosis.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory esophageal disorder, often associated with dysphagia, chest discomfort, and heartburn. There is limited information on persistent esophageal symptoms despite histologic remission (HR). We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of persistent esophageal symptoms in adult patients with EoE in HR. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult EoE patients in HR (<15 eosinophils per high power field [eos/hpf]). Exclusion criteria included: no available data on symptoms, chronic opiate use, disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow on Chicago Classification version 4 diagnosis, esophageal candidiasis, erosive esophagitis, or other known cause of esophageal dysphagia besides EoE. Based on prior literature, definitions include: complete HR (<5 eos/hpf), partial HR (5-14 eos/hpf), and endoscopic fibrostenosis (rings and/or stricture). Esophageal symptoms were assessed within 2 weeks of HR and categorized into the major symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, and heartburn. Given the retrospective nature of the study, a global symptom response (absence or presence) was used. Demographics, disease history, endoscopy reports, EoE endoscopic reference score, and histology were recorded. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Eosinophil thresholds for persistent symptoms were determined using receiver operating characteristics analyses. Of 289 EoE patients in HR, 133 (46%) had esophageal symptoms: dysphagia (N = 119; 41.2%), heartburn (N = 28; 20.8%), and chest pain (N = 10; 7.5%). Significant predictors for persistent dysphagia were anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.77) and endoscopic fibrostenosis (aOR 3.87). Significant predictors for persistent heartburn with or without chest pain were anxiety or depression (aOR 12.2 and aOR 11.0) and partial HR (aOR 1.17 and aOR 1.18). Threshold eosinophil counts for persistent heartburn and chest pain were 2.5 and 3.5 eos/hpf, respectively (AUC 0.71 and 0.69). We report a high prevalence of persistent esophageal symptoms in EoE patients who are in HR. Risk factors include anxiety, depression, endoscopic fibrostenosis, and partial HR. These findings can help direct patient care, including endoscopic dilation and managing psychiatric comorbidities. Targeting less than 2.5 and 3.5 eos/hpf for heartburn and chest pain may be warranted.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux remains a diagnostic challenge due to the lack of a definitive diagnostic tool. Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) pH monitoring has been proven reliable for detecting gastric reflux. This study aims to evaluate the association between clinical scores and MII/pH monitoring according to the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Patients with laryngo-pharyngeal symptoms (LPS) who had a reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥13 or reflux finding score (RFS) ≥7 underwent MII/pH monitoring. The findings were analyzed in comparison with clinical scores. A total of 100 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited for this study. MII/pH monitoring revealed a median acid exposure time (AET) of 1.9% (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.2, 4.9), with 22% of patients recording an AET above 6%. The median number of reflux episodes was 29.5 episodes per day (IQR = 19.0, 43.8), with 7% experiencing more than 80 episodes per day. Gas reflux was identified as the most prevalent type. Based on the Lyon Consensus 2.0, 25 patients exhibited conclusive pathological reflux, while 75 patients showed no conclusive evidence of pathological reflux. No significant differences were found in RSI and RFS between these groups. Only gas reflux episodes showed a significant correlation with RSI (r = 0.255, P = 0.011). RSI and RFS among patients with LPS showed no statistically significant differences in identifying pathological reflux or no conclusive evidence of pathological reflux. This finding suggests that the pathophysiology underlying LPS may not be solely attributable to reflux.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the standards of care of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) treatment, though PPI response rates are variable ranging from 23 to 63% in pediatric studies. We sought to determine if expression of select genes in esophageal mucosa can predict PPI responsiveness in EoE. Children with a new diagnosis of EoE (15 or more eosinophils/hpf on esophageal biopsy) were prospectively treated with 8 weeks of PPI therapy before follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Children with <15 eosinophils/hpf on follow-up were classified as having PPI-Responsive EoE (PPI-R) and ≥ 15 eosinophils/hpf as PPI-Nonresponsive EoE (PPI-NR). Using the Nanostring nCounter Analysis System, mRNA expression of a custom panel of genes was measured in esophageal biopsies. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsies was performed. Among children with EoE, 32% (8/25) had PPI-R EoE. ATP12A, ATP4A, tryptase-beta 2 (TPSB2), CLC and IL13 had higher expression in PPI-NR EoE compared to PPI-R EoE or controls. Immunohistochemical staining of ATP12A was higher among PPI-R EoE and PPI-NR EoE, compared to non-EoE controls. In this study, PPI-NR EoE had significantly higher baseline gene expression of mast cell, cytokine, proton pump, and eosinophil genes compared to PPI-R EoE. PPIs may be involved in an inflammatory cascade of mast cell activation that stimulates IL-13 release, which upregulates ATP12A and ATP4A that leads to eosinophil recruitment. Histologic PPI failure may occur when increased gene expression of these components is high and cannot be overcome pharmacologically, especially in the case of proton pump genes.

Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil showed promising efficacy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, some patients do not achieve curative resection despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy using these drugs. This study aimed to clarify the pretherapeutic characteristics of these patients. We included 113 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and compared the clinical characteristics between patients who achieved curative resection (curative group) and those who failed to achieve curative resection after planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy (noncurative group). Moreover, we determined the factors predicting noncurative outcomes. Ninety-one (81%) and 22 patients (19%) were in the curative and noncurative groups, respectively. The noncurative group had significantly more tumors located in the upper third of the esophagus, larger-sized tumors, and borderline resectable tumors than the curative group (P = 0.003, 0.049, and <0.001, respectively). Moreover, the noncurative group had significantly higher serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen concentrations than the curative group (P = 0.008). Multivariable analysis identified tumor location in the upper third of the esophagus (odds ratio 7.31, P = 0.002), tumor size ≥50 mm (odds ratio 4.71, P = 0.037), and borderline resectable tumors (odds ratio 6.65, P = 0.003) as independent predictors for noncurative outcomes. Tumor location in the upper third of the esophagus, larger-sized tumors, and borderline resectable tumors might be significant predictors for noncurative outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil.

Data on Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal cancer (EC) outcomes in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are limited. We aimed to determine the risk of prevalent BE (<1 year after endoscopy), incident BE (≥1 year after endoscopy), and incident EC in patients with versus without EoE, and to identify predictors of BE/EC in EoE patients. We identified adult patients in the Merative MarketScan Database who underwent first-time upper endoscopy between 2008 and 2020. Chi-square analysis compared proportions of patients with versus without EoE who had BE or EC. Multivariate Cox regression determined associations between demographics/comorbidities and incident BE/EC in the EoE cohort, adjusting for established BE risk factors. Among 2,947,003 patients who underwent upper endoscopy, 20,588 patients (0.70%) had EoE (mean age 40.6 years, 63.8% male, gastroesophageal reflux disease in 44.9%). Prevalent BE, incident BE, and incident EC was found in 1.03%, 0.57%, and 0.06% of patients with EoE versus 1.06%, 0.54%, and 0.05% of patients without EoE, respectively (P = 0.13, 0.21, and 0.36, respectively). Among individuals with EoE, older age, male sex, presence of a hiatal hernia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and location in North Central or Southern USA were independently associated with incident BE. Older age and prevalent BE were independently associated with incident EC. BE/EC risk in EoE is comparable to that of the baseline population undergoing upper endoscopy. Our findings support current understanding that EoE is not associated with an increased risk of BE/EC and reinforce that conventional BE screening strategies can be applied in patients with EoE.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been a limiting factor with POEM. Sling-fiber preservation during POEM was reported to reduce postoperative GERD in Japan. This study investigates the efficacy of this technique in a western population. This is a retrospective, single-center study of patients undergoing POEM from October 2017 to January 2023. The initial cohort of patients were treated by conventional POEM, after which a second cohort underwent POEM with sling-fiber preservation. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. The secondary outcomes were clinical success rate (Eckardt score ≤ 3), procedure time, and adverse events rate. Multivariate regression was then performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. One hundred and forty eight POEM cases (52.5 ± 15.6 y/o, female: 61[43%]) were included. The mean procedure time (108.6 ± 34.5 vs. 109.1 ± 45.7 min, P = 0.93) was similar between the groups. In the sling-fiber preservation group, gastric myotomy length was significantly longer (2.2 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8 cm, P < 0.05), yet the incidence rate of postoperative reflux symptoms at follow-up was significantly lower (22.4% vs. 42.3%, P < 0.05). The clinical success rate was similar between groups (89.5% vs. 83.1%, P = 0.32), and the rate of adverse events requiring intervention (13.5% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.36) was similar. Regression analysis indicated that, after adjusting for other risk factors of postoperative GERD, sling-fiber preservation during POEM had an odds ratio of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.07-0.85, P < 0.05) for the incidence of reflux symptoms. Sling-fiber preservation during POEM reduces the incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. As such, sling-fiber preservation may be a useful solution to reduce post-POEM GERD in western populations.

Patients with chronic diseases have increasingly turned to social media to discuss symptoms and share the challenges they face with disease management. The primary aim of this study is to use naturally occurring data from X (formerly known as Twitter) to identify barriers to care faced by individuals affected by eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). For this qualitative study, the X application programming interface with academic research access was used to search for posts that referenced EoE between 1 January 2019 and 10 August 2022. The posts were identified as being either related to barriers to care for EoE or not. Those related to barriers to care were further categorized by the type of barrier that was expressed. A total of 8636 EoE-related posts were annotated of which 12.1% were related to barriers to care in EoE. The themes that emerged about barriers to care included: dietary challenges, limited treatment options, lack of community support, lack of physician awareness of disease, misinformation, cost of care, lack of patient belief in disease or trust in physician, and limited access to care. Saturation of themes was achieved. This study highlights barriers to care in EoE using readily accessible social media data that is not derived from a curated research setting. Identifying these obstacles is key to improving care for this chronic disease.

Quality indicators (QIs) are standardized metrics that can be used to quantify health care delivery and identify important areas for practice improvement. Nine QIs pertaining to the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) were recently established. We therefore aimed to identify existing gaps in care using these QIs. This is a retrospective, multicenter study utilizing recently established EoE QIs to evaluate practice patterns among adult gastroenterologists in the diagnosis and management of EoE. Three patient cohorts of 30 patients each presenting with dysphagia, food impaction, and new diagnosis of EoE, respectively, were obtained, yielding 120 patients per site to assess for every QI. Summary statistics were reported across two main themes: diagnosis and management. Subsequent analysis of gaps in care was then performed. The domain of diagnosis of EoE (QI 1 and 2) had the most notable gap in care with only 55% of the presenting patients undergoing appropriate evaluation for EoE. The domain of management of EoE had overall higher QI fulfillment-however it also contained significant intra-category variation in care. Notably, while 79% of patients had clinical follow-up within 1 year from remission, only 54% underwent surveillance endoscopy within 2 years of remission. In contrast, 100% of patients with symptomatic strictures independent of histologic response underwent endoscopic dilation (QI 4). Management approaches for EoE are evolving and variation in care delivery exists. We identified significant gaps in both diagnosis of EoE especially amongst patients presenting with index food impaction and long term management of EoE, when retrospectively evaluating care patterns using newly established QIs. This is the first study of its kind to utilize these previously established QIs to objectively identify care gaps that exist in EoE amongst several institutions. These findings also highlight the importance of QIs and standardization of management of complex chronic diseases like EoE to help bridge these gaps and provide a framework to measure adherence to these best practices.

In older patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC), loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with loss of skeletal muscle mass during NAC in older patients with LAEC. This was a single-center exploratory prospective cohort study. Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with LAEC scheduled for curative esophagectomy after NAC were enrolled between October 2021 and December 2023. As a primary endpoint, loss of skeletal muscle mass index (ΔSMI: pre-NAC minus post-NAC value) was calculated from computed tomography images before and after NAC. Significant pre-NAC and during-NAC factors with ΔSMI were detected with a multivariate regression model. Statistical significance was considered as two-tailed P <0.05. A total of 69 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 72.9 years, and 53 (77%) were male. Mean SMI before and after NAC was 43.1 and 40.9 cm2/m2, and mean ΔSMI was 2.2 cm2/m2. In multivariate analysis, ΔSMI was associated with increased sitting time during NAC (per 1 min/day, adjusted coefficient 0.007, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.001 to 0.013, P = 0.016), decreased Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index during NAC (per 1 score, adjusted coefficient -0.146, 95% CI -0.213 to -0.013, P = 0.002), and worsening decreased appetite during NAC (vs. no worsening, adjusted coefficient 1.571, 95% CI 0.279 to 2.862, P = 0.018). It was hypothesized that the inactivity-related mechanism and malnutrition-related mechanism are important for skeletal muscle mass loss during NAC in older patients with LAEC.