Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is recognized as one of the most aggressive cancers with a poor prognosis. Global expression profiling was conducted on primary ESCC tissues with distant metastases. We investigated the identification of secretogranin V (SCG5) as a promising biomarker for the detection and assessment of ESCC. SCG5 transcription levels were evaluated in 21 ESCC cell lines. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown experiments validated SCG5's roles in cell invasion, proliferation, and migration. We utilized a mouse subcutaneous xenograft model to assess tumor growth. SCG5 expression was measured in 164 ESCC tissues by quantitative reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and its association with clinicopathological parameters was investigated. SCG5 protein levels were assessed in surgically resected tissues from 177 patients with ESCC using a tissue microarray. The mRNA expression levels of SCG5 varied widely in ESCC cell lines. The in vitro cell invasion, proliferation, and migration of ESCC cells were suppressed by the knockdown of SCG5. Mouse xenograft models revealed that tumor growth was reduced by small interfering RNA-mediated SCG5 knockdown. Analysis of clinical samples demonstrated that SCG5 mRNA was expressed in ESCC compared to adjacent normal esophageal tissues. High SCG5 mRNA expression was linked to significant decreases in overall and disease-specific survival. Furthermore, SCG5 protein expression was linked to a decrease in disease-specific survival and disease-free survival. The expression of the SCG5 was significantly associated with disease-specific survival, suggesting that SCG5 may play a significant role as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for ESCC.
{"title":"Expression profile and function of secretogranin V, and its effects on the malignant behavior of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Mohammad Hussain Hamrah, Mitsuro Kanda, Yusuke Sato, Haote Zhu, Tuvshin Bayasgalan, Flor Garza, Takahiro Shinozuka, Yuki Ito, Masahiro Sasahara, Dai Shimizu, Shinichi Umeda, Hideki Takami, Norifumi Hattori, Masamichi Hayashi, Chie Tanaka, Yasuhiro Kodera","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is recognized as one of the most aggressive cancers with a poor prognosis. Global expression profiling was conducted on primary ESCC tissues with distant metastases. We investigated the identification of secretogranin V (SCG5) as a promising biomarker for the detection and assessment of ESCC. SCG5 transcription levels were evaluated in 21 ESCC cell lines. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown experiments validated SCG5's roles in cell invasion, proliferation, and migration. We utilized a mouse subcutaneous xenograft model to assess tumor growth. SCG5 expression was measured in 164 ESCC tissues by quantitative reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and its association with clinicopathological parameters was investigated. SCG5 protein levels were assessed in surgically resected tissues from 177 patients with ESCC using a tissue microarray. The mRNA expression levels of SCG5 varied widely in ESCC cell lines. The in vitro cell invasion, proliferation, and migration of ESCC cells were suppressed by the knockdown of SCG5. Mouse xenograft models revealed that tumor growth was reduced by small interfering RNA-mediated SCG5 knockdown. Analysis of clinical samples demonstrated that SCG5 mRNA was expressed in ESCC compared to adjacent normal esophageal tissues. High SCG5 mRNA expression was linked to significant decreases in overall and disease-specific survival. Furthermore, SCG5 protein expression was linked to a decrease in disease-specific survival and disease-free survival. The expression of the SCG5 was significantly associated with disease-specific survival, suggesting that SCG5 may play a significant role as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for ESCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew G R Allaway, Yuchen Luo, Hou Kiat Lim, Kiron Bhatia, Krinal Mori, Alex Craven, Ben Keong, Chek Heng Tog, Thomas Sweeney, Darren Wong, Michelle Goodwin, Christopher Leung, Ahmad Aly, Katheryn Hall, David S Liu
Patients with benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) conditions such as achalasia, gastroparesis and refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease often suffer from debilitating symptoms. These conditions can be complex and challenging to diagnose and treat, making them well suited for discussion within a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). There is, however, a paucity of data describing the value of a benign UGI MDM. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of our unit's benign UGI MDM service and its outcomes. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for all consecutive patients reviewed in the monthly benign UGI MDM between July 2021 and February 2024. The primary outcome was the incidence that MDM review changed clinical treatment. Secondary outcomes included change in diagnosis, additional investigations and referrals to subspecialists. A total of 104 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 73 (70.2%) patients had a change in their overall management following MDM review; 25 (24.0%), 31 (29.8%) and 48 (46.2%) patients had changes in pharmacological, endoscopic and surgical interventions respectively. Most changes in pharmacological and endoscopic intervention involved treatment escalation, whereas most changes in surgical intervention involved treatment de-escalation. A total of 84 (80.8%) patients had a documented diagnosis post-MDM with 44 (42.3%) having a change in their pre-MDM diagnosis. 50 (48.1%) patients had additional investigation/s requested and 49 (47.1%) had additional referral pathway/s recommended. Over two thirds of patients had at least one aspect of their management plan changed following MDM review. These changes occurred across pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical interventions.
{"title":"The clinical utility of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with complex benign upper gastrointestinal conditions.","authors":"Matthew G R Allaway, Yuchen Luo, Hou Kiat Lim, Kiron Bhatia, Krinal Mori, Alex Craven, Ben Keong, Chek Heng Tog, Thomas Sweeney, Darren Wong, Michelle Goodwin, Christopher Leung, Ahmad Aly, Katheryn Hall, David S Liu","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) conditions such as achalasia, gastroparesis and refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease often suffer from debilitating symptoms. These conditions can be complex and challenging to diagnose and treat, making them well suited for discussion within a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). There is, however, a paucity of data describing the value of a benign UGI MDM. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of our unit's benign UGI MDM service and its outcomes. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for all consecutive patients reviewed in the monthly benign UGI MDM between July 2021 and February 2024. The primary outcome was the incidence that MDM review changed clinical treatment. Secondary outcomes included change in diagnosis, additional investigations and referrals to subspecialists. A total of 104 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 73 (70.2%) patients had a change in their overall management following MDM review; 25 (24.0%), 31 (29.8%) and 48 (46.2%) patients had changes in pharmacological, endoscopic and surgical interventions respectively. Most changes in pharmacological and endoscopic intervention involved treatment escalation, whereas most changes in surgical intervention involved treatment de-escalation. A total of 84 (80.8%) patients had a documented diagnosis post-MDM with 44 (42.3%) having a change in their pre-MDM diagnosis. 50 (48.1%) patients had additional investigation/s requested and 49 (47.1%) had additional referral pathway/s recommended. Over two thirds of patients had at least one aspect of their management plan changed following MDM review. These changes occurred across pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jonathan Sivakumar, Qianyu Chen, Nicholas Bull, Michael W Hii, Yahya Al-Habbal, Cuong Phu Duong
The rapid uptake of minimally invasive antireflux surgery has led to interest in learning curves for this procedure. This study ascertains the learning curve in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted antireflux surgery. A systematic review of the literature pertaining to learning curves in minimally invasive fundoplication with or without hiatal hernia repair was performed using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. A meta-regression analysis was undertaken to identify the number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency, and a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between cases that were undertaken during a surgeon's learning phase and experienced phase. Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria. A meta-regression analysis was performed to quantitatively investigate the trend of number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency from 1996 to present day. Using a mixed-effects negative binomial regression model, the predicted learning curve for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted antireflux surgery was found to be 24.7 and 31.1 cases, respectively. The meta-analysis determined that surgeons in their learning phase may experience a moderately increased rate of conversion to open procedure (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28, 4.64), as well as a slightly increased rate of intraoperative complications (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.08, 2.38), postoperative complications (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.36, 2.87), and needing reintervention (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.16, 2.34). This study provides an insight into the expected caseload to be competent in performing antireflux surgery. The discrepancy between outcomes during and after the learning curve for antireflux surgery suggests a need for close proctorship for learning surgeons.
随着微创抗反流手术的迅速普及,人们开始关注这种手术的学习曲线。本研究确定了腹腔镜和机器人辅助反流手术的学习曲线。本研究使用 PubMed、Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库对有关微创胃底折叠术(带或不带裂孔疝修补术)学习曲线的文献进行了系统性回顾。通过荟萃回归分析确定了达到手术熟练程度所需的病例数,并通过荟萃分析比较了外科医生学习阶段和经验丰富阶段的病例结果。共有 25 项研究符合资格标准。我们进行了元回归分析,以定量研究从 1996 年至今达到外科熟练程度所需病例数的趋势。使用混合效应负二项回归模型,发现腹腔镜和机器人辅助抗流手术的预测学习曲线分别为 24.7 例和 31.1 例。荟萃分析表明,处于学习阶段的外科医生转为开放手术的几率可能会适度增加(几率比 [OR] 2.44,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.28,4.64),术中并发症(OR 1.60;95% CI 1.08,2.38)、术后并发症(OR 1.98;95% CI 1.36,2.87)和需要再次手术(OR 1.64;95% CI 1.16,2.34)的几率也会略有增加。这项研究让我们了解了胜任抗反流手术的预期工作量。抗反流手术学习曲线期间和学习曲线之后的结果之间的差异表明,需要对学习中的外科医生进行严密的指导。
{"title":"Determining the learning curve of minimally invasive antireflux surgery: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.","authors":"Jonathan Sivakumar, Qianyu Chen, Nicholas Bull, Michael W Hii, Yahya Al-Habbal, Cuong Phu Duong","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid uptake of minimally invasive antireflux surgery has led to interest in learning curves for this procedure. This study ascertains the learning curve in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted antireflux surgery. A systematic review of the literature pertaining to learning curves in minimally invasive fundoplication with or without hiatal hernia repair was performed using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. A meta-regression analysis was undertaken to identify the number of cases to achieve surgical proficiency, and a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes between cases that were undertaken during a surgeon's learning phase and experienced phase. Twenty-five studies met the eligibility criteria. A meta-regression analysis was performed to quantitatively investigate the trend of number of cases required to achieve surgical proficiency from 1996 to present day. Using a mixed-effects negative binomial regression model, the predicted learning curve for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted antireflux surgery was found to be 24.7 and 31.1 cases, respectively. The meta-analysis determined that surgeons in their learning phase may experience a moderately increased rate of conversion to open procedure (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28, 4.64), as well as a slightly increased rate of intraoperative complications (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.08, 2.38), postoperative complications (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.36, 2.87), and needing reintervention (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.16, 2.34). This study provides an insight into the expected caseload to be competent in performing antireflux surgery. The discrepancy between outcomes during and after the learning curve for antireflux surgery suggests a need for close proctorship for learning surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paroma Bose, Wenwu Zhang, Pegah Mehrpouya-Bahrami, Katrina Collins, Jennifer Zhao, Anthony M Cannon, Eric Albright, Muhammad T Idrees, Anthony Perkins, Sandeep K Gupta, Emily C Hon, Mark H Kaplan
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the standards of care of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) treatment, though PPI response rates are variable ranging from 23 to 63% in pediatric studies. We sought to determine if expression of select genes in esophageal mucosa can predict PPI responsiveness in EoE. Children with a new diagnosis of EoE (15 or more eosinophils/hpf on esophageal biopsy) were prospectively treated with 8 weeks of PPI therapy before follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Children with <15 eosinophils/hpf on follow-up were classified as having PPI-Responsive EoE (PPI-R) and ≥ 15 eosinophils/hpf as PPI-Nonresponsive EoE (PPI-NR). Using the Nanostring nCounter Analysis System, mRNA expression of a custom panel of genes was measured in esophageal biopsies. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsies was performed. Among children with EoE, 32% (8/25) had PPI-R EoE. ATP12A, ATP4A, tryptase-beta 2 (TPSB2), CLC and IL13 had higher expression in PPI-NR EoE compared to PPI-R EoE or controls. Immunohistochemical staining of ATP12A was higher among PPI-R EoE and PPI-NR EoE, compared to non-EoE controls. In this study, PPI-NR EoE had significantly higher baseline gene expression of mast cell, cytokine, proton pump, and eosinophil genes compared to PPI-R EoE. PPIs may be involved in an inflammatory cascade of mast cell activation that stimulates IL-13 release, which upregulates ATP12A and ATP4A that leads to eosinophil recruitment. Histologic PPI failure may occur when increased gene expression of these components is high and cannot be overcome pharmacologically, especially in the case of proton pump genes.
质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是治疗嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)的标准药物之一,但在儿科研究中,PPI的反应率从23%到63%不等。我们试图确定食管粘膜中特定基因的表达能否预测嗜酸性食管炎患者对 PPI 的反应。我们对新诊断为食管水肿(食管活检嗜酸性粒细胞数大于或等于 15 个/hpf)的儿童进行了为期 8 周的前瞻性 PPI 治疗,然后再进行后续的食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)。患儿
{"title":"Increased expression of proton pump and allergic inflammation genes predicts PPI failure in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.","authors":"Paroma Bose, Wenwu Zhang, Pegah Mehrpouya-Bahrami, Katrina Collins, Jennifer Zhao, Anthony M Cannon, Eric Albright, Muhammad T Idrees, Anthony Perkins, Sandeep K Gupta, Emily C Hon, Mark H Kaplan","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the standards of care of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) treatment, though PPI response rates are variable ranging from 23 to 63% in pediatric studies. We sought to determine if expression of select genes in esophageal mucosa can predict PPI responsiveness in EoE. Children with a new diagnosis of EoE (15 or more eosinophils/hpf on esophageal biopsy) were prospectively treated with 8 weeks of PPI therapy before follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Children with <15 eosinophils/hpf on follow-up were classified as having PPI-Responsive EoE (PPI-R) and ≥ 15 eosinophils/hpf as PPI-Nonresponsive EoE (PPI-NR). Using the Nanostring nCounter Analysis System, mRNA expression of a custom panel of genes was measured in esophageal biopsies. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsies was performed. Among children with EoE, 32% (8/25) had PPI-R EoE. ATP12A, ATP4A, tryptase-beta 2 (TPSB2), CLC and IL13 had higher expression in PPI-NR EoE compared to PPI-R EoE or controls. Immunohistochemical staining of ATP12A was higher among PPI-R EoE and PPI-NR EoE, compared to non-EoE controls. In this study, PPI-NR EoE had significantly higher baseline gene expression of mast cell, cytokine, proton pump, and eosinophil genes compared to PPI-R EoE. PPIs may be involved in an inflammatory cascade of mast cell activation that stimulates IL-13 release, which upregulates ATP12A and ATP4A that leads to eosinophil recruitment. Histologic PPI failure may occur when increased gene expression of these components is high and cannot be overcome pharmacologically, especially in the case of proton pump genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142141668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Edoardo Vespa, Alberto Barchi, Francesco Vito Mandarino, Ernesto Fasulo, Maria Caterina Fratto, Sandro Passaretti, Francesco Azzolini, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Silvio Danese
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia, yet there is still a lack of technical standardization. No clear definition of 'long', 'standard', or 'short' POEM exists to date. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to analyze current POEM length standards. We included studies reporting technical details of POEM, in which no definite or comparative myotomy length was intentionally adopted (standard myotomy). The primary outcome was the pooled mean total myotomy length. Sub-group analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity across studies. From the initial 7172 records, 31 studies with 3023 patients were included. Pooled mean of total myotomy length was 10.39 cm (95% CI 10.06-10.71; I2 99.3%). Pooled mean of esophageal and gastric myotomy length, provided by 17 studies, was 7.11 cm (95% CI 6.51-7.71; I2 99.8%) and 2.81 cm (95% CI 2.41-3-22; I2 99.8%), respectively. On subgroup analysis for achalasia subtypes, pooled mean length in non-spastic achalasia (type I and II) was 10.17 cm (95% CI 9.91-10.43; I2 94.2%), while in type III it was 14.02 cm (95% CI 10.59-17.44; I2 98.9%). Pooled mean myotomy length for studies conducted between 2014-2020 was 10.53 cm (95% CI, 10.22-10.84; I2 99.1%) and 9.74 cm (95% CI, 7.95-11.54; I2 99.7%) in 2021-2022. Myotomy length during a 'standard' POEM is 10.4 cm, remaining over 10 cm in non-spastic achalasia. The high heterogeneity across studies confirms that the POEM technique needs further standardization. We found no significant time trend towards adopting short POEM, despite recent evidence supporting its use.
口周内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是一种治疗贲门失弛缓症的成熟疗法,但目前仍缺乏技术标准化。迄今为止,"长"、"标准 "或 "短 "POEM 尚无明确定义。我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以分析当前的 POEM 长度标准。我们纳入了报告 POEM 技术细节的研究,其中并没有刻意采用明确或可比较的肌切术长度(标准肌切术)。主要结果是肌切术总长度的汇总平均值。为探讨不同研究间的异质性,进行了分组分析。从最初的 7172 条记录中,共纳入了 31 项研究,3023 名患者。肌肉切口总长度的汇总平均值为 10.39 厘米(95% CI 10.06-10.71;I2 99.3%)。17 项研究提供的食管和胃肌切术长度的汇总平均值分别为 7.11 厘米(95% CI 6.51-7.71;I2 99.8%)和 2.81 厘米(95% CI 2.41-3-22;I2 99.8%)。在贲门失弛缓症亚型分组分析中,非痉挛性贲门失弛缓症(I 型和 II 型)的集合平均长度为 10.17 厘米(95% CI 9.91-10.43;I2 94.2%),而 III 型为 14.02 厘米(95% CI 10.59-17.44;I2 98.9%)。2014-2020年期间进行的研究的汇总平均肌切长度为10.53厘米(95% CI,10.22-10.84;I2 99.1%),2021-2022年为9.74厘米(95% CI,7.95-11.54;I2 99.7%)。标准 "POEM 的肌切长度为 10.4 厘米,非痉挛性贲门失弛缓症的肌切长度仍超过 10 厘米。不同研究之间的高度异质性证实,POEM 技术需要进一步标准化。尽管最近有证据支持采用短POEM,但我们并未发现采用短POEM的明显时间趋势。
{"title":"Standard length of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Edoardo Vespa, Alberto Barchi, Francesco Vito Mandarino, Ernesto Fasulo, Maria Caterina Fratto, Sandro Passaretti, Francesco Azzolini, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Silvio Danese","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia, yet there is still a lack of technical standardization. No clear definition of 'long', 'standard', or 'short' POEM exists to date. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to analyze current POEM length standards. We included studies reporting technical details of POEM, in which no definite or comparative myotomy length was intentionally adopted (standard myotomy). The primary outcome was the pooled mean total myotomy length. Sub-group analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity across studies. From the initial 7172 records, 31 studies with 3023 patients were included. Pooled mean of total myotomy length was 10.39 cm (95% CI 10.06-10.71; I2 99.3%). Pooled mean of esophageal and gastric myotomy length, provided by 17 studies, was 7.11 cm (95% CI 6.51-7.71; I2 99.8%) and 2.81 cm (95% CI 2.41-3-22; I2 99.8%), respectively. On subgroup analysis for achalasia subtypes, pooled mean length in non-spastic achalasia (type I and II) was 10.17 cm (95% CI 9.91-10.43; I2 94.2%), while in type III it was 14.02 cm (95% CI 10.59-17.44; I2 98.9%). Pooled mean myotomy length for studies conducted between 2014-2020 was 10.53 cm (95% CI, 10.22-10.84; I2 99.1%) and 9.74 cm (95% CI, 7.95-11.54; I2 99.7%) in 2021-2022. Myotomy length during a 'standard' POEM is 10.4 cm, remaining over 10 cm in non-spastic achalasia. The high heterogeneity across studies confirms that the POEM technique needs further standardization. We found no significant time trend towards adopting short POEM, despite recent evidence supporting its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142114776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rumination syndrome (RS) is an underdiagnosed behavioral disorder of recurrent regurgitation. Regurgitation occurs in RS due to increased gastric pressure achieved by subconscious contraction of the abdominal musculature wall, reversing the pressure gradient between the esophagus and the stomach. RS is mainly diagnosed clinically by the Rome Criteria with symptoms of regurgitation without retching of recently ingested food into the mouth and subsequent spitting or re-mastication. When the diagnosis is unable to be made clinically, supportive testing including fed impedance manometry can be considered. RS occurs worldwide, affecting patients of all ages, races, and genders with a prevalence of 3.1-5.8%. There is significant overlap with RS and disorders of a gut-brain interaction and upright gastroesophageal reflux driven by aerophagia and supragastric belching. There is also an association with mood disorder, fibromyalgia, and eating disorders. RS may be misdiagnosed as a variety of other syndromes including gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, achalasia, and bulimia nervosa. Once RS is diagnosed, the mainstay of treatment is diaphragmatic breathing to lower the intragastric pressure and increase the lower esophageal pressure. Diaphragmatic breathing can be supported with biofeedback and cognitive behavioral therapy as well as medication options for more refractory cases. Response to therapy overtime and changes in symptoms overtime can now be tracked with a validated questionnaire.
{"title":"Current state of rumination syndrome.","authors":"Sydney Pomenti, David A Katzka","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae041","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doae041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rumination syndrome (RS) is an underdiagnosed behavioral disorder of recurrent regurgitation. Regurgitation occurs in RS due to increased gastric pressure achieved by subconscious contraction of the abdominal musculature wall, reversing the pressure gradient between the esophagus and the stomach. RS is mainly diagnosed clinically by the Rome Criteria with symptoms of regurgitation without retching of recently ingested food into the mouth and subsequent spitting or re-mastication. When the diagnosis is unable to be made clinically, supportive testing including fed impedance manometry can be considered. RS occurs worldwide, affecting patients of all ages, races, and genders with a prevalence of 3.1-5.8%. There is significant overlap with RS and disorders of a gut-brain interaction and upright gastroesophageal reflux driven by aerophagia and supragastric belching. There is also an association with mood disorder, fibromyalgia, and eating disorders. RS may be misdiagnosed as a variety of other syndromes including gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, achalasia, and bulimia nervosa. Once RS is diagnosed, the mainstay of treatment is diaphragmatic breathing to lower the intragastric pressure and increase the lower esophageal pressure. Diaphragmatic breathing can be supported with biofeedback and cognitive behavioral therapy as well as medication options for more refractory cases. Response to therapy overtime and changes in symptoms overtime can now be tracked with a validated questionnaire.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140917487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nodal status is well known to be the most important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients, even if they are treated with neoadjuvant therapy. To establish an optimal postoperative adjuvant strategy for patients, we aimed to more accurately predict the prognosis of patients and systemic recurrence by using clinicopathological factors, including nodal status, in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological factors associated with survival and systemic recurrence were investigated in 488 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival differed according to tumor depth, nodal status, tumor regression, and lymphovascular (LV) invasion. In the multivariate analysis, nodal status and LV invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008). Nodal status was also identified as an independent factor associated with systemic recurrence, although LV invasion was a borderline factor (P = 0.066). In each pN stage, patients with LV invasion showed significantly worse overall survival than those without LV invasion (pN0: P = 0.036, pN1: P = 0.0044, pN2: P = 0.0194, pN3: P = 0.0054). Patients with LV invasion were also more likely to have systemic, and any recurrence than those without LV invasion in each pN stage. Pathological nodal status and LV invasion were the most important predictors of survival and systemic recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. This finding could provide useful information about selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy among these patients. Our analysis showed that LV invasion was an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and that combining LV invasion with pathological nodal status makes it possible to stratify the prognosis in those patients.
{"title":"Prognostic impact of nodal status and lymphovascular invasion in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Hiroshi Miyata, Keijirou Sugimura, Takashi Kanemura, Tomohira Takeoka, Takahito Sugase, Masayoshi Yasui, Junichi Nishimura, Hiroshi Wada, Hiroshi Akita, Masaaki Yamamoto, Hisashi Hara, Naoki Shinno, Takeshi Omori, Masahiko Yano","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae038","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doae038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nodal status is well known to be the most important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients, even if they are treated with neoadjuvant therapy. To establish an optimal postoperative adjuvant strategy for patients, we aimed to more accurately predict the prognosis of patients and systemic recurrence by using clinicopathological factors, including nodal status, in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological factors associated with survival and systemic recurrence were investigated in 488 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival differed according to tumor depth, nodal status, tumor regression, and lymphovascular (LV) invasion. In the multivariate analysis, nodal status and LV invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008). Nodal status was also identified as an independent factor associated with systemic recurrence, although LV invasion was a borderline factor (P = 0.066). In each pN stage, patients with LV invasion showed significantly worse overall survival than those without LV invasion (pN0: P = 0.036, pN1: P = 0.0044, pN2: P = 0.0194, pN3: P = 0.0054). Patients with LV invasion were also more likely to have systemic, and any recurrence than those without LV invasion in each pN stage. Pathological nodal status and LV invasion were the most important predictors of survival and systemic recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. This finding could provide useful information about selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy among these patients. Our analysis showed that LV invasion was an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and that combining LV invasion with pathological nodal status makes it possible to stratify the prognosis in those patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140861567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
F Klevebro, S Ash, C Mueller, G M Garbarino, S S Gisbertz, M I van Berge Henegouwen, Y Mandeville, L Ferri, A Davies, N Maynard, D E Low
Surgery for cancer of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction can be performed with a variety of minimally invasive and open approaches. The left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LTE) is an open technique that gives an opportunity to operate in the chest and abdomen with excellent exposure of the gastro-esophageal junction through a single incision, and there is currently no equivalent minimally invasive technique available. The aim of this multi-institutional review was to study a large contemporary international study cohort of patients treated with LTE. An international multicenter cohort study was performed including all patients treated with LTE at six high-volume centers for gastro-esophageal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2022. Patient data were prospectively collected in each participating centers' institutional database. Information about patient, tumor, and treatment details were collected. The study cohort included a total of 793 patients treated with LTE during the study period. The most frequently observed complications were pneumonia in 185/727 (25.5%) patients and atrial fibrillation in 91/727 (12.5%). Anastomotic leak occurred in 35/727 (4.8%) patients; no patient suffered from conduit necrosis. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 15/785 (1.9%) patients and 90-day mortality in 39/785 (5.0%) patients. Factors with statistically significant association with survival were American Society for Anesthesiologists-score, tumor location, tumor stage, and tumor free resection margins. Neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with increased survival compared to surgery alone but neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed statistically significant improved survival with hazard ratio 0.60 (95% confidence intervals:0.44-0.80, P = 0.001) in a multivariable adjusted model. This study demonstrates that LTE can be applied in selected patients with results that are comparable to other large studies of open and minimally invasive surgery for esophageal or gastro-esophageal cancer at high-volume centers.
{"title":"Contemporary outcomes of left thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy due to cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"F Klevebro, S Ash, C Mueller, G M Garbarino, S S Gisbertz, M I van Berge Henegouwen, Y Mandeville, L Ferri, A Davies, N Maynard, D E Low","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae039","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doae039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgery for cancer of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction can be performed with a variety of minimally invasive and open approaches. The left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LTE) is an open technique that gives an opportunity to operate in the chest and abdomen with excellent exposure of the gastro-esophageal junction through a single incision, and there is currently no equivalent minimally invasive technique available. The aim of this multi-institutional review was to study a large contemporary international study cohort of patients treated with LTE. An international multicenter cohort study was performed including all patients treated with LTE at six high-volume centers for gastro-esophageal cancer surgery between 2012 and 2022. Patient data were prospectively collected in each participating centers' institutional database. Information about patient, tumor, and treatment details were collected. The study cohort included a total of 793 patients treated with LTE during the study period. The most frequently observed complications were pneumonia in 185/727 (25.5%) patients and atrial fibrillation in 91/727 (12.5%). Anastomotic leak occurred in 35/727 (4.8%) patients; no patient suffered from conduit necrosis. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 15/785 (1.9%) patients and 90-day mortality in 39/785 (5.0%) patients. Factors with statistically significant association with survival were American Society for Anesthesiologists-score, tumor location, tumor stage, and tumor free resection margins. Neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with increased survival compared to surgery alone but neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed statistically significant improved survival with hazard ratio 0.60 (95% confidence intervals:0.44-0.80, P = 0.001) in a multivariable adjusted model. This study demonstrates that LTE can be applied in selected patients with results that are comparable to other large studies of open and minimally invasive surgery for esophageal or gastro-esophageal cancer at high-volume centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140867531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tobias Hauge, Thomas Dretvik, Egil Johnson, Tom Mala
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication following esophageal resection. No clear consensus exist for the optimal handling of this severe complication. The aim of this study was to describe the treatment outcome following AL. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients with AL operated with Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from 2010 to 2021 at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. 74/526 (14%) patients had AL. Patient outcomes were analyzed and categorized according to main AL treatment strategy; stent (54%), endoscopic vacuum therapy and stent (EVT + stent) (19%), nasogastric tube and antibiotics (conservative) (16%), EVT (8%) and by other endoscopic means (other) (3%). One patient had surgical debridement of the chest cavity. In 66 patients (89%), the perforation healed after median 27 (range: 4-174) days. Airway fistulation was observed in 11 patients (15%). Leak severity (ECCG) was associated with development of airway fistula (P = 0.03). The median hospital and intensive care unit stays were 30 (range: 12-285) and 9 (range: 0-60) days. The 90-days mortality among patients with AL was 5% and at follow up, 13% of all deaths were related to AL. AL closure rates were comparable across the groups, but longer in the EVT + stent group (55 days vs. 29.5 days, P = 0.04). Thirty-two percent developed a symptomatic anastomotic stricture within 12 months. Conclusion: The majority of AL can be treated endoscopically with preservation of the conduit and the anastomosis. We observed a high number of AL-associated airway fistulas.
吻合口漏(AL)是食管切除术后一种可怕的并发症。对于这一严重并发症的最佳处理方法,目前尚无明确的共识。本研究旨在描述 AL 发生后的治疗结果。我们进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,研究对象包括 2010 年至 2021 年在挪威奥斯陆大学医院接受 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的所有 AL 患者。74/526(14%)名患者患有 AL。根据主要的 AL 治疗策略对患者的结果进行了分析和分类;支架(54%)、内镜真空治疗和支架(EVT + 支架)(19%)、鼻胃管和抗生素(保守)(16%)、EVT(8%)和其他内镜方法(其他)(3%)。一名患者进行了胸腔手术清创。66 名患者(89%)的穿孔在中位 27 天(4-174 天)后愈合。11 名患者(15%)出现气道瘘。渗漏严重程度(ECCG)与气道瘘的发生有关(P = 0.03)。住院和重症监护室的中位住院时间分别为 30 天(范围:12-285 天)和 9 天(范围:0-60 天)。AL患者的90天死亡率为5%,在随访期间,13%的死亡与AL有关。各组的AL闭合率相当,但EVT+支架组的AL闭合时间更长(55天 vs. 29.5天,P = 0.04)。32%的患者在12个月内出现无症状吻合口狭窄。结论:大多数 AL 可通过内镜治疗,并保留导管和吻合口。我们观察到大量与 AL 相关的气道瘘。
{"title":"Treatment of anastomotic leakage following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy-10 year experience from a Nordic center.","authors":"Tobias Hauge, Thomas Dretvik, Egil Johnson, Tom Mala","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae040","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doae040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication following esophageal resection. No clear consensus exist for the optimal handling of this severe complication. The aim of this study was to describe the treatment outcome following AL. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients with AL operated with Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from 2010 to 2021 at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. 74/526 (14%) patients had AL. Patient outcomes were analyzed and categorized according to main AL treatment strategy; stent (54%), endoscopic vacuum therapy and stent (EVT + stent) (19%), nasogastric tube and antibiotics (conservative) (16%), EVT (8%) and by other endoscopic means (other) (3%). One patient had surgical debridement of the chest cavity. In 66 patients (89%), the perforation healed after median 27 (range: 4-174) days. Airway fistulation was observed in 11 patients (15%). Leak severity (ECCG) was associated with development of airway fistula (P = 0.03). The median hospital and intensive care unit stays were 30 (range: 12-285) and 9 (range: 0-60) days. The 90-days mortality among patients with AL was 5% and at follow up, 13% of all deaths were related to AL. AL closure rates were comparable across the groups, but longer in the EVT + stent group (55 days vs. 29.5 days, P = 0.04). Thirty-two percent developed a symptomatic anastomotic stricture within 12 months. Conclusion: The majority of AL can be treated endoscopically with preservation of the conduit and the anastomosis. We observed a high number of AL-associated airway fistulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360862/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140923967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maurits R Visser, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Richard van Hillegersberg
{"title":"Centralization and Quality Control in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: a Way Forward in Europe.","authors":"Maurits R Visser, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Richard van Hillegersberg","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae035","DOIUrl":"10.1093/dote/doae035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140868235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}