Diseases of the Esophagus最新文献

This preclinical feasibility study investigates the potential of utilizing the hinotori™ robot system for esophagectomy. In three human cadaver models, the esophagus was successfully mobilized and resected using the hinotori™ system, with a mean thoracic procedure time of 57 minutes. The system allowed for precise dissection and radical lymphadenectomy without arm collision, attributed to its versatile design and docking-free trocars. Standard robot-specific patient positioning, including a 35° left lateral inclination, and trocar placement in a posterior axillary line configuration were employed. Notably, trocars suitable for both laparoscopy and the hinotori™ robot were utilized, providing flexibility in trocar selection. Unique features, such as the ergonomic console and pointer-based pivot point identification system, contributed to procedural success. While these findings highlight the promising potential of the hinotori™ system in advancing esophageal surgery, further clinical studies are warranted to validate its reproducibility and clinical utility. Additionally, enhancements to the pivot point identification system and evaluation of the arm base's features may further optimize surgical outcomes.

This study aims to compare pHmetric characteristics of diurnal and nocturnal supine reflux. We studied 500 consecutive individuals with clinical suspicion of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry and prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring. Patients were classified with supine GERD pattern when the percentage of acid reflux time in the supine position was equal to or greater than 2.2%. Data on acid reflux in the supine position during daytime and nighttime recumbency were: (i) acid exposure time, (ii) number of reflux episodes, (iii) longest reflux episode, (iv) interval between the last meal and the supine position, (v) interval between the supine position and the first acid reflux episode, and (vi) reported symptoms. Of the 500 evaluated patients, 238 (48%) had GERD. Among these, supine pattern was observed in 134 (56%) patients, bipositional in 53 (23%), and orthostatic in 51 (21%). In patients with daytime recumbency, 112 (51% of 217) were pathological refluxers, with a mean DeMeester score of 45 ± 26. Total acid exposure time (P = 0.8) and reported Symptom Index (P = 0.2) did not differ depending on the period, whether diurnal or nocturnal. All other pHmetric parameters were lower during daytime recumbency. In conclusion, diurnal supine reflux has similar acid exposure time and temporal correlation between symptoms and reflux episodes as nocturnal supine reflux. Other pHmetric parameters are lower for diurnal supine reflux.

Expiratory flow is an important factor in the achievement of airway clearance that is required to prevent postoperative pneumonia (POP). Although peak expiratory flow (PEF) has been shown to predict the occurrence of POP in lung cancer patients after lobectomy, its predictive power in relation to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer remains unknown. This study assesses PEF as a predictor of POP in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radical esophagectomy. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction at our institution between January 2007 and December 2022. Preoperative pulmonary functions, including PEF, were assessed before surgery. Additionally, POP was diagnosed as a Clavien-Dindo classification of Grade II or higher. Survival and pneumonia incidence were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between these variables and POP. The study included 513 patients, of which 441 were men. POP occurred in 86 patients (16.7%). When all patients were stratified by %PEF into two groups, the group with %PEF lower that 80% had significantly poorer prognosis and higher incidence of pneumonia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that %PEF (OR: 0.986, 95%CI: 0.974-0.999, P = 0.030), along with age, BMI, preoperative treatment, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were independent protective factors against POP. These results reveal that %PEF predicts the development of POP following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Radioactive esophageal stent, known for inhibiting tumor growth and delaying restenosis in malignant esophageal tumors, presents challenges due to potent radiation, leading to side effects. This study aims to support the clinical use of 188Re radioactive esophageal stent. The 188Re stent with 128 MBq initial activity was placed in a biomimetic esophageal membrane. Radiation absorption doses were measured by thermoluminescence and calculated using mathematical software. Under simulated positioning, the stent was implanted in the esophagus of an experimental pig, followed by the feeding of Kangfuxin solution and nursing care (KFX-RT). Non-implanted and implanted-only pigs served as normal (CR) and experimental (RT) controls. Blood samples collected on days 7 and 21 were analyzed for inflammatory factors (TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-6) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Esophageal tissue cells were assessed for deoxyribonucleic acid index (DI) and subdiploid content through flow cytometry. Absorbed doses at 0.5 mm and 5 mm reference points were 223.91 cGy and 20.55 cGy, respectively, with 92.64% absorbed within a 1 mm thickness. Radiation dose significantly decreased at 6.5 mm, with only 4.72% absorbed at depths ≥6.5 mm. On days 7 and 21, levels of inflammatory factors, DI and subdiploid content were significantly increased in the KFX-RT and RT groups compared to the CR group, while all levels in the KFX-RT group were significantly lower than in the RT group. The 188Re esophageal stent exhibits high radiation absorption in superficial tissues and low absorption in deeper tissues. Kangfuxin solution combined with nursing care alleviates radiation-induced inflammatory damage.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal carcinoma has emerged as the contemporary alternative to conventional laparoscopic minimally invasive (LMIE), hybrid (HE) and open (OE) surgical approaches. No single study has compared all four approaches with a view to postoperative outcomes. A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken. A network meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-network meta-analysis guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R and Shiny. Seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 1063 patients were included. Overall, 32.9% of patients underwent OE (350/1063), 11.0% underwent HE (117/1063), 34.0% of patients underwent LMIE (361/1063), and 22.1% of patients underwent RAMIE (235/1063). OE had the lowest anastomotic leak rate 7.7% (27/350), while LMIE had the lowest pulmonary 10.8% (39/361), cardiac 0.56% (1/177) complications, re-intervention rates 5.08% (12/236), 90-day mortality 1.05% (2/191), and shortest length of hospital stay (mean 11.25 days). RAMIE displayed the lowest 30-day mortality rate at 0.80% (2/250). There was a significant increase in pulmonary complications for those undergoing OE (OR 3.63 [95% confidence interval: 1.4-9.77]) when compared to RAMIE. LMIE is a safe and feasible option for esophagectomy when compared to OE and HE. The upcoming RCTs will provide further data to make a more robust interrogation of the surgical outcomes following RAMIE compared to conventional open surgery to determine equipoise or superiority of each approach as the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy continues to evolve (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registration: CRD42023438790).

Esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to bear high morbidity and mortality. Prehabilitation, using exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial strategies to optimize patients prior to surgical resection, is largely underexplored in this malignancy, especially in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Objectives of this study were (i) to determine feasibility of prehabilitation during treatment in patients with esophageal cancer and (ii) to establish differences between hospital and home-based exercise. Patients were recruited from August 2019 - February 2023 and blindly randomized to either supervised or homebased exercise, receiving identical nutritional and psychosocial support. The main outcome measures were recruitment, retention, and dropout rates. The secondary outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, and quality of life. Forty-four subjects were blindly randomized: 23 to supervised exercise and 21 to home-based exercise (72% recruitment rate). Overall compliance for the supervised group was 72%; home-based group was 77%. Baseline to pre-operative, both groups experienced significant increases in sit-to-stand, arm curls, and amount of weekly moderate-vigorous physical activity. The home-based group experienced an additional considerable decrease in up-and-go test times. Both groups maintained cardiorespiratory fitness and saw substantial increases in some quality-of-life scores. Multimodal prehabilitation is feasible for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In both groups, patient fitness, which is relevant for this patient population given the anticipated decline in functional status during this period, was maintained. This study provides a foundation for future prehabilitation interventions in this patient population.

Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (<60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (>70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.

Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) can be an achalasia variant caused by neuromuscular dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), or the manometric manifestation of mechanical processes that impair EGJ distensibility. Distinction among these conditions has important implications for treatment, but can be difficult. We hypothesized that response to botulinum toxin (BT) injection of the LES could be a diagnostic test for identifying achalasia-variant EGJOO likely to respond to LES muscle-directed invasive therapy. We reviewed our experience with symptomatic EGJOO patients who had BT injection of the LES. Data collected include demographics, esophageal body manometry findings, esophagram evidence of retention, and symptom response at 1-6 months after BT injection categorized as poor, partial, or good. Clinical response to any subsequent LES-directed invasive treatment (EsoFLIP dilation, pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, or POEM) also was recorded. Thirteen symptomatic EGJOO patients were included (mean age 55.9 ± 16.4 years; eight men, five women). Symptom response to BT injection was good in six (46%), partial in three (23%), and poor in three (23%); one was lost to follow-up. All five patients who received invasive treatment after partial or good response to BT had a partial or good response to invasive treatment. The one patient who had invasive treatment after a poor response to BT had a poor response to invasive treatment. These findings suggest that a good response to BT injection of the LES can identify an achalasia-variant form of EGJOO that will respond to LES muscle-directed invasive therapy.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a global chronic disease. Short video platforms make it easy for patients with GERD to obtain medical information. However, the quality of information from these videos remains uncertain. This study aimed to systematically assess videos related to GERD on TikTok and Bilibili. We conducted a search and gathered 241 Chinese videos related to GERD and recorded the essential information. Two independent evaluators assessed each video based on the completeness of six components of the GERD guidelines, and assessed the quality and reliability of the information in the videos using recognition tools. Finally, videos from different sources were compared. The uploaders of most videos were medical professionals (86.7%, n = 209). The content was mainly about symptoms and treatment. The quality of the videos information varied depending on the sources. Among videos posted on Bilibili, those posted by medical professionals had a lower content score for definition (P < 0.001). Videos produced by non-gastroenterologists had the highest mean modified DISCERN. (The DISCERN scoring tool was initially created for assessing written publications, but nowadays, it is frequently leveraged for appraising various health-related videos. Details can be found in the text) quality of the videos information was acceptable; however, the content varied significantly depending on the type of source used. Videos with broad content should be carefully screened to meet more needs.