Physiotherapy Canada最新文献

Purpose: The objective of our study was to analyze visual and textual content of private physiotherapy clinic Web sites with a critical analysis framework.

Method: We analyzed 43 private physiotherapy clinics' Web sites from all regions of one Canadian province (Quebec). For each Web site, we collected and aggregated the data using a standardized extraction grid to index visual and textual content. We then conducted an analysis of the collected data using the Seven-Step Framework for Critical Analysis proposed by Nixon and colleagues.

Results: Most Web sites presented elements related to sports and active lifestyles in their names, logos, or pictures. Persons represented in the Web sites were mainly young, white, and active. Ethnic and body diversity were generally not depicted. Information encompassing manual therapy and sports injuries management largely prevailed.

Conclusions: The textual and visual content of private physiotherapy clinic Web sites was not consistent with the physiotherapy community's commitments to upholding equity principles and to serving a wide range of individuals. To fulfill the highest professional and ethical standards, the physiotherapy community should reflect on the representation of physiotherapy services and clients on Web sites to ensure that the trend towards privatization of physiotherapy services does not perpetuate the systems of inequality present in society.

Purpose: Force plates can be used to monitor landing asymmetries during rehabilitation, but they are not widely available. Accelerometer-based wearable technology may be a more feasible solution. The purpose of this article was to determine the agreement between impact accelerations measured with force plates and accelerometer-derived measures of (1) centre of mass (COM) acceleration and (2) tibial acceleration asymmetries during bilateral landings.

Method: Participants completed three countermovement jumps (CMJ) and three squat jumps (SJ) on dual force plates with triaxial accelerometers attached to each tibia and lower back, near the COM. Bland and Altman 95% limits of agreement (95% LOA) were calculated.

Results: 19 adults (n = 11; 58% women, n = 8; 42% men) participated in the study. The mean differences between impact and COM accelerations were 0.24 g (95% LOA: -1.34 g to 1.82 g) and 0.38 g (95% LOA: -1.15 to 1.91 g) for the CMJ and SJ, respectively. The mean differences between the impact and tibial acceleration-based lower limb asymmetries in the CMJ and SJ were -6% (95% LOA: -32% to 19%) and 0% (95% LOA: -45% to 45%), respectively.

Conclusions: Our findings show acceptable agreement between impact acceleration and accelerometer-based COM acceleration and lack of agreement between impact accelerations and accelerometer-based tibial acceleration asymmetries. COM acceleration could be used to quantify landing impacts during rehabilitation, but we do not consider the accelerometer-based asymmetry measures to be a suitable alternative for force plate-based measures. Future work should focus on determining normative values for lower extremity asymmetries during landing tasks.

Purpose: This clinical practice guide (CPG) aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for promoting and enhancing the participation and integration of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) into physical activities that take place in the home, school, community, or rehabilitation clinic contexts.

Methods: A panel of key stakeholders relevant to these contexts (parents, instructors, rehabilitation professionals) developed evidence-based recommendations using a consensus methodology after reviewing results from a recent systematic review of relevant literature. The quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based was evaluated (2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence scale) as was the strength of the final CPG recommendations (American Society of Plastic Surgeons Grade Recommendation Scale).

Results: Recommendations (n = 50; 36% supported by robust, empirically derived evidence) for the different stakeholder groups fell into three categories: 1) Choose an appropriate activity for your child, 2) Harmonize the activity with the child's interests and abilities, and 3) Help the child learn new movements prior to the activity.

Conclusions: This comprehensive CPG provides concrete recommendations, based on the currently available evidence, that can be used by stakeholders to address the physical activity participation and integration needs of children with DCD in a variety of contexts.