首页 > 最新文献

Physiotherapy Canada最新文献

英文 中文
Clinician's Commentary on O'Neil. et al.1. 临床医生对奥尼尔的评论。和al.1。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0040-cc
Alan Chong W Lee
{"title":"Clinician's Commentary on O'Neil. et al.<sup>1</sup>.","authors":"Alan Chong W Lee","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0040-cc","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0040-cc","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"132-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41156547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Does Cochrane Say About … the Efficacy of Self-management Interventions in Rehabilitation? Cochrane如何评价自我管理干预在康复中的疗效?
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-75.2-cochrane
{"title":"What Does Cochrane Say About … the Efficacy of Self-management Interventions in Rehabilitation?","authors":"","doi":"10.3138/ptc-75.2-cochrane","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-75.2-cochrane","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510559/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41163717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP). 评估康复干预的传播和实施影响:分级重复臂补充计划(GRASP)。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2022-0117
Chieh-Ling Yang, Louise A Connell, Janice J Eng

Purpose: To evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention.

Methods: Systematic evaluation of data sources including academic publishing metrics, publications, and surveys was used to describe the dissemination and implementation impact of the graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP). Three categories in the Payback Framework were evaluated: knowledge production and dissemination, benefits to future research and research use, and real-world uptake and implementation.

Results: In the Knowledge production and dissemination category, seven publications, authored by the GRASP research team, were associated with the GRASP, and there were approximately 17,000 download counts of GRASP manuals from the website from 120 countries. In the Benefits to future research and research use category, 15 studies and 8 registered clinical trials, authored by researchers outside of the GRASP team, have used GRASP as an intervention. In the real-world uptake and implementation category, GRASP has informed recommendations in 2 clinical guidelines and 20 review papers, and had high implementation uptake (e.g., 35% [53/154] of UK therapists surveyed had used GRASP; 95% [649/681] who downloaded GRASP had used it). More than 75% of those who had used GRASP identified that GRASP provides more intensity in upper extremity rehabilitation, is evidence-based and easy to implement, and the equipment and manual are easy to obtain.

Conclusion: The Payback Framework is useful to evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. GRASP has been implemented extensively in clinical practice and community in a relatively short time since it has been developed.

目的:评估康复干预措施的传播和实施效果。方法:对包括学术出版指标、出版物和调查在内的数据来源进行系统评估,以描述分级重复臂补充计划(GRASP)的传播和实施影响。对回报框架中的三个类别进行了评估:知识生产和传播、对未来研究和研究使用的好处以及现实世界的吸收和实施。结果:在知识生产和传播类别中,GRASP研究团队撰写的七份出版物与GRASP有关,从120个国家的网站上下载的GRASP手册约有17000份。在对未来研究和研究使用的益处类别中,由GRASP团队以外的研究人员撰写的15项研究和8项注册临床试验使用了GRASP作为干预措施。在现实世界的接受和实施类别中,GRASP在2份临床指南和20篇综述论文中提出了建议,并且实施率很高(例如,35%的受访英国治疗师[53/154]使用过GRASP;95%的下载GRASP的治疗师[649/681]使用过它)。超过75%的使用过GRASP的人认为,GRASP在上肢康复中提供了更高的强度,基于证据且易于实施,并且设备和手册易于获得。结论:回报框架有助于评估康复干预措施的传播和实施影响。GRASP自开发以来,在相对较短的时间内在临床实践和社区中得到了广泛的应用。
{"title":"Evaluating the Dissemination and Implementation Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention: The Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP).","authors":"Chieh-Ling Yang, Louise A Connell, Janice J Eng","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2022-0117","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2022-0117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic evaluation of data sources including academic publishing metrics, publications, and surveys was used to describe the dissemination and implementation impact of the graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP). Three categories in the Payback Framework were evaluated: knowledge production and dissemination, benefits to future research and research use, and real-world uptake and implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the <i>Knowledge production and dissemination</i> category, seven publications, authored by the GRASP research team, were associated with the GRASP, and there were approximately 17,000 download counts of GRASP manuals from the website from 120 countries. In the <i>Benefits to future research and research use</i> category, 15 studies and 8 registered clinical trials, authored by researchers outside of the GRASP team, have used GRASP as an intervention. In the <i>real-world uptake and implementation</i> category, GRASP has informed recommendations in 2 clinical guidelines and 20 review papers, and had high implementation uptake (e.g., 35% [53/154] of UK therapists surveyed had used GRASP; 95% [649/681] who downloaded GRASP had used it). More than 75% of those who had used GRASP identified that GRASP provides more intensity in upper extremity rehabilitation, is evidence-based and easy to implement, and the equipment and manual are easy to obtain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Payback Framework is useful to evaluate the dissemination and implementation impacts of a rehabilitation intervention. GRASP has been implemented extensively in clinical practice and community in a relatively short time since it has been developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"105-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510554/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41156788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Do Older Canadians Think They Need to Walk Well? 加拿大老年人认为他们需要走得好吗?
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0021
Ahmed Abou-Sharkh, Kedar K V Mate, Mehmet Inceer, José A Morais, Suzanne N Morin, Nancy E Mayo

Purpose: To identify older Canadians' perception of the importance of expert-generated elements of walking quality, and the contributors to and consequences of perceived walking quality.

Method: Cross-sectional survey of 649 adults was conducted through a commercial participant panel, Hosted in Canada Surveys.

Results: Of the 649 respondents, 75% were between 65 and 74 years old (25% ≥ 75) and 49% were women. The most important elements were foot, ankle, hip, and knee mobility with little difference in ranks across walking perception (Fr χ12 = 5.0, p > 0.05). People who were older by a decade were more likely to report poorer walking (POR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.7), as were women compared to men, and people who used a walking aid compared to none. Lung disease showed the highest association with a perception of not walking well (POR: 7.2; 95% CI: 3.7, 14.2). The odds of being willing to pay more for a technology to improve walking were always greater for those with a lower perception of their walking quality.

Conclusions: People who perceived their walking quality as poor were more likely to report poorer health and were willing to pay more for a technology to improve walking. This supports the opportunity of leveraging wearable technologies to improve walking.

目的:确定加拿大老年人对专家生成的步行质量要素的重要性的看法,以及感知步行质量的因素和后果。方法:通过商业参与者小组“加拿大调查”对649名成年人进行横断面调查。结果:在649名受访者中,75%的人年龄在65岁至74岁之间(25%≥75岁),49%为女性。最重要的因素是脚、脚踝、臀部和膝盖的活动能力,在行走感知方面的排名差异很小(Frχ12=5.0,p>0.05)。年龄大十岁的人更有可能报告行走较差(POR:1.4;95%CI:1.0,1.7),女性与男性相比,使用助行器的人与没有使用助行剂的人相比也是如此。肺部疾病与走路不好的感觉相关最高(POR:7.2;95%CI:3.714.2)。对于那些对走路质量感知较低的人来说,愿意为改善走路的技术支付更多费用的几率总是更大。结论:认为自己走路质量差的人更有可能报告自己的健康状况较差,并愿意为改善走路的技术支付更多费用。这为利用可穿戴技术改善步行提供了机会。
{"title":"What Do Older Canadians Think They Need to Walk Well?","authors":"Ahmed Abou-Sharkh, Kedar K V Mate, Mehmet Inceer, José A Morais, Suzanne N Morin, Nancy E Mayo","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0021","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify older Canadians' perception of the importance of expert-generated elements of walking quality, and the contributors to and consequences of perceived walking quality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional survey of 649 adults was conducted through a commercial participant panel, Hosted in Canada Surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 649 respondents, 75% were between 65 and 74 years old (25% ≥ 75) and 49% were women. The most important elements were foot, ankle, hip, and knee mobility with little difference in ranks across walking perception (Fr <i>χ</i><sup>12</sup> = 5.0, <i>p</i> > 0.05). People who were older by a decade were more likely to report poorer walking (POR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.7), as were women compared to men, and people who used a walking aid compared to none. Lung disease showed the highest association with a perception of not walking well (POR: 7.2; 95% CI: 3.7, 14.2). The odds of being willing to pay more for a technology to improve walking were always greater for those with a lower perception of their walking quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People who perceived their walking quality as poor were more likely to report poorer health and were willing to pay more for a technology to improve walking. This supports the opportunity of leveraging wearable technologies to improve walking.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41156789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender Issues in Physiotherapy in Quebec, Canada. 加拿大魁北克省理疗中的性别问题。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0142
Debbie Ehrmann Feldman, Cassandra Bellavance, David Frédérick, Tomás Gagnon, Charlotte Lalonde, Anne Hudon

Purpose: This study examines gender differences in the physiotherapy (PT) profession in the province of Quebec regarding: (1) areas of practice; (2) roles associated with the advancement of the profession; (3) formal disciplinary complaints; and (4) interests and competency perceptions of PT students.

Methods: We collected data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information, the Quebec Professional Order of Physiotherapy, Quebec university public Internet sites, and PT associations. We also surveyed PT students at the Université de Montréal.

Results: The PT workforce in Quebec was 76.6% women. The presidents of the four main PT associations were men. In the five university programmes, the percentage of male and female physiotherapists in tenure track positions was 46% and 54%, respectively. There were more sanctioned complaints of sexual misconduct and not maintaining continuing education for male physiotherapists, while more women were sanctioned for problems with documentation and billing. Among students, men were more interested in becoming administrators, but neither men nor women had a strong interest in research.

Conclusions: Male physiotherapists make up 23.4% of the PT workforce in Quebec but are more involved in leadership positions in the profession than women.

目的:本研究调查了魁北克省物理治疗(PT)专业在以下方面的性别差异:(1)实践领域;(2) 与职业发展相关的角色;(3) 正式的纪律申诉;(4)PT学生的兴趣和能力认知。方法:我们从加拿大健康信息研究所、魁北克物理疗法专业协会、魁北克大学公共互联网网站和PT协会收集数据。我们还调查了蒙特利尔大学的PT学生。结果:魁北克PT劳动力中女性占76.6%。四个主要PT协会的主席都是男性。在五个大学课程中,担任终身制物理治疗师职位的男性和女性比例分别为46%和54%。对男性理疗师性行为不端和未继续接受教育的投诉得到了更多的批准,而更多的女性因文件和账单问题而受到制裁。在学生中,男性对成为行政人员更感兴趣,但男性和女性都对研究没有强烈兴趣。结论:在魁北克省,男性理疗师占PT劳动力的23.4%,但比女性更多地参与该行业的领导职位。
{"title":"Gender Issues in Physiotherapy in Quebec, Canada.","authors":"Debbie Ehrmann Feldman, Cassandra Bellavance, David Frédérick, Tomás Gagnon, Charlotte Lalonde, Anne Hudon","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2020-0142","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2020-0142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines gender differences in the physiotherapy (PT) profession in the province of Quebec regarding: (1) areas of practice; (2) roles associated with the advancement of the profession; (3) formal disciplinary complaints; and (4) interests and competency perceptions of PT students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information, the Quebec Professional Order of Physiotherapy, Quebec university public Internet sites, and PT associations. We also surveyed PT students at the Université de Montréal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PT workforce in Quebec was 76.6% women. The presidents of the four main PT associations were men. In the five university programmes, the percentage of male and female physiotherapists in tenure track positions was 46% and 54%, respectively. There were more sanctioned complaints of sexual misconduct and not maintaining continuing education for male physiotherapists, while more women were sanctioned for problems with documentation and billing. Among students, men were more interested in becoming administrators, but neither men nor women had a strong interest in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Male physiotherapists make up 23.4% of the PT workforce in Quebec but are more involved in leadership positions in the profession than women.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510562/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41163471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Survey of Canadian Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Students' Knowledge and Use of Executive Functioning Assessments in Clinical Practice. 加拿大物理治疗师和物理治疗师学生在临床实践中执行功能评估知识和使用情况的调查。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0020
Nicole A Guitar, Denise M Connelly, Laura L Murray, Susan W Hunter

Purpose: This study examined what physiotherapists and physiotherapy students understand and know about executive functioning (EF), what EF outcome measures they use clinically, and whether their primary area of practice influences their assessment practices.

Method: An open online survey was distributed to registered members of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, its various divisions, and colleges of physiotherapy within Canada that took approximately 15 minutes to complete and was available for 13 months. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between subjective and objective understanding and knowledge of EF (UKEF) and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze differences in survey responses based on respondents' primary area of practice.

Results: A total of 335 respondents consented to participate (completion rate = 78.4%). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between subjective and objective UKEF (r = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.54; n = 260; p < 0.001). Significant differences in survey responses were related to physiotherapists' primary areas of practice (i.e., musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiorespiratory, or multi-systems; F12,555.89 = 2.29, p = 0.008; Wilks Λ = 0.880; partial η2 = 0.042).

Conclusions: Respondents reported that they had good subjective UKEF, but this was only moderately correlated with objective UKEF.

目的:本研究调查了理疗师和理疗师学生对执行功能(EF)的理解和了解,他们在临床上使用的EF结果指标,以及他们的主要实践领域是否影响他们的评估实践。方法:向加拿大理疗协会、其各部门和加拿大理疗学院的注册成员分发一份公开的在线调查,该调查耗时约15分钟,有效期为13个月。Pearson相关性用于评估主观和客观对EF(UKEF)的理解和知识之间的关系,并使用单向多变量方差分析来分析基于受访者主要实践领域的调查结果差异。结果:共有335名受访者同意参与(完成率=78.4%)。主观和客观UKEF之间存在显著的中度正相关(r=0.43;95%置信区间:0.32,0.54;n=260;p F12555.89=2.29,p=0.008;Wilks∧=0.880;部分η2=0.042)。结论:受访者报告他们具有良好的主观UKEF,但这仅与客观UKEF适度相关。
{"title":"A Survey of Canadian Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Students' Knowledge and Use of Executive Functioning Assessments in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Nicole A Guitar, Denise M Connelly, Laura L Murray, Susan W Hunter","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0020","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined what physiotherapists and physiotherapy students understand and know about executive functioning (EF), what EF outcome measures they use clinically, and whether their primary area of practice influences their assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An open online survey was distributed to registered members of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association, its various divisions, and colleges of physiotherapy within Canada that took approximately 15 minutes to complete and was available for 13 months. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between subjective and objective understanding and knowledge of EF (UKEF) and a one-way multivariate analysis of variance was used to analyze differences in survey responses based on respondents' primary area of practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 335 respondents consented to participate (completion rate = 78.4%). There was a significant moderate positive correlation between subjective and objective UKEF (<i>r</i> = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.54; <i>n</i> = 260; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant differences in survey responses were related to physiotherapists' primary areas of practice (i.e., musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiorespiratory, or multi-systems; <i>F</i><sub>12,555.89</sub> = 2.29, <i>p</i> = 0.008; Wilks Λ = 0.880; partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents reported that they had good subjective UKEF, but this was only moderately correlated with objective UKEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510553/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41165585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Stratification in a Tertiary Care Spine Centre: Comparison Between STarTBack and OSPRO-YF Screening Tools. 三级脊柱护理中心的风险分层:STarTBack和OSPRO-YF筛查工具的比较。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0026
Susan Robarts, Helen Razmjou, Albert Yee, Joel Finkelstein

Purpose: STarT Back Screening Tool and OSPRO-YF scales have been reported to be accurate tools for estimating risk for the development of persistent pain or prolonged disability in primary care settings. We performed a comparison of construct convergent and known-group validity and ceiling floor effect (CFE) of these tools using a common sample of patients seen at a tertiary care spine centre.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with and without a work-related back injury. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used as the reference outcome measure for convergent validity. For known-group validity, we examined the ability of the scales to differentiate between different levels of compensation, presence of non-organic signs, and work status. The CFE values were calculated.

Results: Fifty consecutive injured workers were included along with 50 patients without an active compensation claim related to their low back pain. STarTBack and OSPRO-YF had moderate to high associations with the depression component of the HADS (0.69 to 0.77 respectively) with a statistically significant difference in favour of the OSPRO-YF. STarTBack's risk stratification categories were able to differentiate patients with a compensable injury, non-organic signs, and inability to work (p values ranging from 0.002 to < 0.001). The physical activity and work fear-avoidance beliefs constructs of the OSPRO-YF consistently outperformed other yellow flag constructs (p values ranging from 0.008 to < 0.001). The psychological sub-score of STarTBack showed a ceiling effect. There was a floor effect for the negative affect domain of OSPRO-YF. Neither total score had a floor or ceiling effect.

Conclusions: STarTBack and OSPRO-YF are short screening tools with acceptable convergent and known-group construct validity and no floor or ceiling effect of their total score. Both tools could assist with the identification, evaluation, and management of psychological distress in patients presenting to tertiary care spine centres.

目的:据报道,STarT背部筛查工具和OSPRO-YF量表是评估初级保健环境中持续疼痛或长期残疾风险的准确工具。我们使用在三级医疗脊柱中心就诊的常见患者样本,对这些工具的结构收敛性和已知群体有效性以及天花板-地板效应(CFE)进行了比较。方法:这是一项横断面研究,研究对象为有和没有与工作相关的背部损伤的患者。医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)被用作收敛有效性的参考结果测量。对于已知的群体有效性,我们检查了量表区分不同补偿水平、非器质性体征的存在和工作状态的能力。计算CFE值。结果:包括50名连续受伤的工人,以及50名因腰痛而没有主动索赔的患者。STarTBack和OSPRO-YF与HADS的抑郁成分有中度至高度的相关性(分别为0.69至0.77),有利于OSPRO-YF的统计学显著差异。STarTBack的风险分层类别能够区分具有可补偿损伤、非器质性体征和其他症状的患者,和无法工作(p值从0.002到<0.001)。OSPRO-YF的身体活动和工作恐惧回避信念结构始终优于其他黄旗结构(p值在0.008到<0.001之间)。STarTBack的心理子得分显示出上限效应。OSPRO-YF的负面影响域存在下限效应。总分都没有下限或上限效应。结论:STarTBack和OSPRO-YF是一种短筛选工具,具有可接受的收敛性和已知的组构有效性,其总分没有下限或上限效应。这两种工具都有助于识别、评估和管理接受三级脊柱护理中心治疗的患者的心理困扰。
{"title":"Risk Stratification in a Tertiary Care Spine Centre: Comparison Between STarTBack and OSPRO-YF Screening Tools.","authors":"Susan Robarts, Helen Razmjou, Albert Yee, Joel Finkelstein","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0026","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>STarT Back Screening Tool and OSPRO-YF scales have been reported to be accurate tools for estimating risk for the development of persistent pain or prolonged disability in primary care settings. We performed a comparison of construct convergent and known-group validity and ceiling floor effect (CFE) of these tools using a common sample of patients seen at a tertiary care spine centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of patients with and without a work-related back injury. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used as the reference outcome measure for convergent validity. For known-group validity, we examined the ability of the scales to differentiate between different levels of compensation, presence of non-organic signs, and work status. The CFE values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty consecutive injured workers were included along with 50 patients without an active compensation claim related to their low back pain. STarTBack and OSPRO-YF had moderate to high associations with the depression component of the HADS (0.69 to 0.77 respectively) with a statistically significant difference in favour of the OSPRO-YF. STarTBack's risk stratification categories were able to differentiate patients with a compensable injury, non-organic signs, and inability to work (<i>p</i> values ranging from 0.002 to < 0.001). The physical activity and work fear-avoidance beliefs constructs of the OSPRO-YF consistently outperformed other yellow flag constructs (<i>p</i> values ranging from 0.008 to < 0.001). The psychological sub-score of STarTBack showed a ceiling effect. There was a floor effect for the negative affect domain of OSPRO-YF. Neither total score had a floor or ceiling effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STarTBack and OSPRO-YF are short screening tools with acceptable convergent and known-group construct validity and no floor or ceiling effect of their total score. Both tools could assist with the identification, evaluation, and management of psychological distress in patients presenting to tertiary care spine centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510560/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41163716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinician's Commentary on Guitar et al.1. 临床医生对吉他等的评论1。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0020-cc
Claire Donnellan
{"title":"Clinician's Commentary on Guitar et al.<sup>1</sup>.","authors":"Claire Donnellan","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0020-cc","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0020-cc","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"187-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41141150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Perspectives on Transitions from Acute to Community-Based Physiotherapy Care Following Total Knee Replacement Surgery Within the Context of a Bundled Care Model. 在捆绑护理模式的背景下,患者对全膝关节置换术后从急性物理治疗向社区物理治疗过渡的看法。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0053
Emily Chen, Stuart Brownell, Taylor DiBrita, Aden Green, Lindsay McPherson, Rehginald Ragos, Caroline Jones, Alison Bonnyman, Gonxhe Kastrati, Karen Yoshida, Amanda Smart

Purpose: Research on fiscal implications of the bundled care (BC) model exist; however, patient-perceived experiences are less well known. As BC expands in Ontario, this study aims to examine these experiences with physiotherapy care within the total knee replacement (TKR) BC programme.

Methods: Qualitative cross-sectional study design. Semi-structured one-on-one telephone interviews were conducted with eight patients four to six weeks post-TKR. Thematic analysis was used.

Results: This exploratory study identified three themes across the care journey that patients perceived as influencing their physiotherapy experiences: timely access to physiotherapy care, quality of physiotherapy care, and patient outcomes. Communication, clinical support, and social support were sub-themes.

Conclusions: Patients' overall experiences with BC physiotherapy were positive. Areas for improvement included coordination of postoperative physiotherapy and return-to-work support. Patients valued group settings and were interested in meeting previous TKR patients. Health system planners are advised to consider incorporating patient experiences when evaluating and developing BC programmes to achieve patient-centred outcomes.

目的:研究捆绑式医疗模式的财政影响;然而,患者感知的体验却鲜为人知。随着不列颠哥伦比亚省在安大略省的扩张,本研究旨在检验全膝关节置换术(TKR)不列颠哥伦比亚省项目中物理治疗护理的这些经验。方法:定性横断面研究设计。TKR术后4-6周,对8名患者进行了半结构化的一对一电话访谈。采用了专题分析。结果:这项探索性研究确定了患者认为影响其理疗体验的护理过程中的三个主题:及时获得理疗护理、理疗护理质量和患者结果。沟通、临床支持和社会支持是次要主题。结论:患者对BC理疗的总体体验是积极的。需要改进的领域包括协调术后理疗和重返工作岗位支持。患者重视小组设置,并有兴趣与以前的TKR患者会面。建议卫生系统规划者在评估和制定BC计划以实现以患者为中心的结果时,考虑将患者经验纳入其中。
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Transitions from Acute to Community-Based Physiotherapy Care Following Total Knee Replacement Surgery Within the Context of a Bundled Care Model.","authors":"Emily Chen, Stuart Brownell, Taylor DiBrita, Aden Green, Lindsay McPherson, Rehginald Ragos, Caroline Jones, Alison Bonnyman, Gonxhe Kastrati, Karen Yoshida, Amanda Smart","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0053","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Research on fiscal implications of the bundled care (BC) model exist; however, patient-perceived experiences are less well known. As BC expands in Ontario, this study aims to examine these experiences with physiotherapy care within the total knee replacement (TKR) BC programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative cross-sectional study design. Semi-structured one-on-one telephone interviews were conducted with eight patients four to six weeks post-TKR. Thematic analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This exploratory study identified three themes across the care journey that patients perceived as influencing their physiotherapy experiences: timely access to physiotherapy care, quality of physiotherapy care, and patient outcomes. Communication, clinical support, and social support were sub-themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients' overall experiences with BC physiotherapy were positive. Areas for improvement included coordination of postoperative physiotherapy and return-to-work support. Patients valued group settings and were interested in meeting previous TKR patients. Health system planners are advised to consider incorporating patient experiences when evaluating and developing BC programmes to achieve patient-centred outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"190-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510550/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41152433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinician's Commentary on O'Neil et al.1. 临床医生对O'Neil等人的评论。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0039-cc
Sarah Gregor
{"title":"Clinician's Commentary on O'Neil et al.<sup>1</sup>.","authors":"Sarah Gregor","doi":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0039-cc","DOIUrl":"10.3138/ptc-2021-0039-cc","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54606,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada","volume":"75 2","pages":"156-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41158453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Physiotherapy Canada
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1