Background: Cemented stems are currently recommended for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) due to their reduced risk of revision and periprosthetic fractures (PPF). However, cementless stems with a collar may enhance implant stability. This study assessed the effect of collar addition on revision rates and implant survival in conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA), double mobility THA (THA DM) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) for FNFs.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the presence of a collar on cementless stems could play a protective role against both all-cause and periprosthetic fracture revision risk in FNFs.
Methods: A total of 5,189 hip procedures for FNFs, recorded by the Swiss National Joint Registry between 2012 and 2023, were included. Patients received Corail™ collarless cementless (n = 900), collared cementless (n = 2,028), and cemented stems (n = 2,261). Cumulative percent revision (CPR) was calculated for all-cause revision and revision for PPF. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval were estimated with adjustment for age, gender, BMI, ASA scores, approach, and size of stems to compare revision risk among the three groups. Subgroup analyses were performed among implant types: HA, THA DM, and THA.
Results: Cemented stems had a lower all-cause revision rate than collarless stems (3.2 versus 6.9%, p < .001) and for PPF (0.5 versus 2.9%, p < .001). However, no statistical difference was found when cemented stems were compared with collared stems. After adjustment, collarless stems showed a significantly higher risk of all-cause revision (HR: 1.91 (1.30-2.79], p < .001) and PPF (HR: 5.82 (2.68-12.67], p < .001) compared with cemented stems. No significant difference was found between collared and cemented stems. Increased ASA, BMI 30-34.9, and posterior approach also predicted higher revision risk. In subgroup analyses, cemented and collared stems were consistently associated with a lower or equivalent risk of all-cause revision compared to collarless cementless stems regardless of the implant type.
Conclusion: Collared and cemented stems demonstrated equivalent and superior implant survival compared to collarless stems for both all-cause and PPF revisions. Collared stems appear to be a viable alternative to cemented stems when treating FNFs.
Level of evidence: III.
Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into hip and knee surgery has been evolving rapidly, with significant implications for diagnostics, surgical planning, and outcome prediction. However, there has been limited literature with comprehensive overview of AI in arthroplasty surgery. This bibliometric analysis aims to identify the 50 most cited articles on AI in hip and knee surgery, highlighting key contributors, research trends, and methodological patterns.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized that AI has generated a growing body of influential research in hip and knee surgery, with specific trends in applications, geographic distribution, and methodological approaches.
Material and methods: A systematic search was performed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on July 14, 2025, using predefined keywords related to AI and hip/knee surgery. Original research articles were screened and ranked by citation count. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze bibliometric variables including authorship, journal impact factor, country of origin, and AI techniques.
Results: The 50 most cited articles, published between 2016 and 2023, accumulated a total of 7,140 citations (mean: 142.8; range: 59-735). The most cited article received 735 citations. The United States was the most prolific contributor, accounting for 27 articles (54.0%) and 2,772 citations (38.8%). Deep learning was the most frequently used AI technique (29 articles, 58% of articles). Knee-related topics were predominant, addressed in 32 articles (64.0%) while hip-related studies represented 18 articles (36.0%). Thematic focus was predominantly diagnostic with 31 articles (62.0%) centered on radiographic interpretation. There was no significant correlation between journal impact factor and citation count (Pearson's r = 0.21; p = 0.28).
Discussion: This bibliometric analysis outlines the foundational literature driving AI adoption in hip and knee surgery. While the field is rapidly expanding, research remains unevenly distributed, with limited focus on hip surgery and treatment-oriented AI. Future studies should emphasize clinical validation, generalizability, and the integration of explainable AI into orthopedic practice.
Level of evidence: IV.
Background: An optimized anesthetic protocol for joint arthroplasty should provide effective surgical anesthesia, promote early motor function recovery, and minimize postoperative pain and adverse effects. To meet these goals, we developed the SOLIS anesthesia protocol, which combines chloroprocaine short-acting Spinal anesthesia, an Opioid- and benzodiazepine-free anesthesia, large doses of Local anesthetics for Infiltration, and propofol Sedation. The objectives of this descriptive quality-improvement report were to determine whether the SOLIS protocol would provide effective anesthesia, enhance recovery, offer adequate postoperative pain control and be satisfactory for patients undergoing hip or knee replacement.
Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that the SOLIS protocol would meet these four objectives.
Patients and methods: We reviewed 906 unilateral joint replacements: 265 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), 32 unicompartimental knee arthroplasties (UKAs), and 609 total hip arthroplasties (THAs). The protocol efficacy was assessed by the rate of conversion to general anesthesia and the mean motor block duration, time to ambulation, the failure to ambulate on the day of surgery, and patient reported postoperative pain. Adverse events and complications were collected, and a subjective questionnaire was used to assess patients' satisfaction.
Results: There were no conversions to general anesthesia. The mean motor block duration was 89.7 ± 20.9 (88.0, 47.0-198.0) min, exceeding the mean time from injection to the end of surgery of 74.5 ± 16.5 (71.0, 39.0-140.0) min. On the day of surgery, only 1.3% of patients failed to ambulate. In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), the mean pain score was 1.7/10 ± 2.2 (1.0, 0.0-10.0), with 162 (17.9%) patients requiring opioids, which were oral for 85 (53%). Main complications were urinary retention requiring catheterization in eight (0.9%), orthostatic hypotension during the first ambulation was observed in 42 (4.6%). Deep vein thrombosis occurred in two (0.2%), and pulmonary embolism in one (0.1%). Patients rated at 98% their satisfaction with the anesthesia protocol and 96% for the postoperative pain management.
Conclusion: SOLIS is a very effective anesthesia protocol for hip and knee replacement, promoting enhanced recovery with low postoperative pain, and achieving a very high patient satisfaction rate. However, implementing this protocol may require a dedicated arthroplasty team and environment.
Level of evidence: IV; continuous case series with no comparison group.
Introduction: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are malignant tumors of connective tissue, characterized by a wide heterogeneity in their presentations, resulting in variable therapeutic strategies between reference centers. However, clinical outcomes from an orthopedic and trauma surgery department of university hospitals are poorly documented. We evaluated the 5-year local recurrence rate of patients managed according to our local strategy and operated in our department, which is certified for the management of both soft tissues and bone sarcomas. We also assessed overall survival, metastasis and reoperation rates, as well as risk factors associated with these events.
Hypothesis: Our hypothesis was that our results were relatively similar to those from other reference centers.
Materials and methods: We analyzed 466 cases of STS of the limbs and trunk operated on between 2012 and 2019. The median patient age was 57 years, including 259 men (56%). Among them, 351 tumors (75%) were treatment-naïve; 18 patients (4%) had lymph node involvement, and 33 patients (7%) presented with metastases at initial management. There were 315 sarcomas larger than 5 cm (72%). Sarcomas were located deep in 385 cases (83%) and in the proximal lower limb in 352 cases (76%). A total of 216 sarcomas (52%) were grade 3. The most frequent histologic subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 104, 22%), myxofibrosarcoma (n = 82, 18%), synovial sarcoma (n = 45, 10%), and myxoid and/or round cell liposarcoma (n = 42, 9%). Regarding treatments, 414 patients (89%) underwent limb-sparing surgery, 261 (56%) received radiotherapy, and 138 (30%) received chemotherapy.
Results: At 5 years of follow-up, the local recurrence rate was 14% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10-18%). Independent risk factors were non-naïve presentation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.04-3.11, p = 0.037), superficial tumor location (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.20-3.83, p = 0.01), grade 3 histology (HR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.22-2.83, p = 0.004), positive surgical margins (HR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.44-4.24, p = 0.001), and administration of chemotherapy (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.30-0.87, p = 0.014). Overall survival was 60% (95% CI = 55-66%). The incidence of metastases was 28% (95% CI = 23-33%), and the rate of reoperations was 40% (95% CI = 36-45%).
Conclusion: In our university orthopedic and trauma surgery department, the oncological outcomes were comparable to those reported in the literature from other specialized centers, whether with exclusively oncologic activity or not.
Level of evidence: IV; retrospective study.
Initially indicated for tumor surgery only, the reliability and modularity of megaprostheses of the knee, and in particular of the distal femur, have broadened indications for revision of standard knee prostheses with significant bone destruction and for trauma surgery, particularly in elderly patients. In oncologic surgery, implant survival is 80% at 5 years, but almost half will be revised by 15 years, sometimes with multiple revision. Complications are numerous; infection is the most common and the main cause of amputation. Mechanical stress is significant and, despite technological progress, no ideal implant exists. Although design is simple, the technique is demanding, to limit risk of loosening, fracture and patellar complications. Managing these complications requires good knowledge of knee prostheses in general and of techniques specific to megaprostheses. Level of evidence: V; expert opinion.

