Oncologist最新文献

Background: Pemigatinib demonstrated efficacy in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-altered cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in the FIGHT-202 trial. However, limited real-world evidence exists on treatment patterns and outcomes in this setting.

Patients and methods: Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of US adults who received pemigatinib for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic CCA were collected via retrospective physician-abstracted chart review. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results: Data from 120 patients (49.2% male; 55.0% White; 19.2% Hispanic; median age at initial pemigatinib prescription, 64.5 years) were collected from 18 physicians/practices. At the time of prescribing, 90.0% of patients had metastatic disease. FGFR2 testing was completed for 92.5% of patients; of those, all but one (result unknown) tested positive, and 95.5% were tested using next-generation sequencing. Pemigatinib was prescribed as second- and third-line therapy among 94.2% and 5.8% of patients, respectively. The most common starting dosage was 13.5 mg daily for 14 days of 21-day cycles (87.5% of patients). Among 60 patients (50.0% of the full cohort) who discontinued pemigatinib during the 6.5-month median study follow-up period, 68.3% discontinued due to disease progression. The median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) from the date of pemigatinib initiation was 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.4-8.6), and the real-world overall response rate (rwORR) was 59.2% (95% CI: 50.0%-68.4%).

Conclusion: This study complements the FIGHT-202 clinical trial by assessing the use of pemigatinib among a diverse population of patients with CCA under real-world conditions. Findings support the clinical benefit of pemigatinib demonstrated in FIGHT-202.

Background: Both novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and pertuzumab and trastuzumab (HP) combined with chemotherapy(C) regimens are the choice of treatment for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Our team's previous research has shown significant therapeutic effects of novel anti-HER2 ADCs in patients with TKIs treatment failure. Unfortunately, there is currently no data available to compare novel anti-HER2 ADCs with HP combined with chemotherapy regimens. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of novel anti-HER2 ADCs with that of the HP combined with chemotherapy regimen in patients for whom TKI treatment failed.

Materials and methods: HER2-positive MBC who used novel anti-HER2 ADCs and HP combined with a chemotherapy regimen from January 2019 to August 2023 were included, and all patients received TKIs. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary study endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety.

Results: A total of 150 patients, of which 83 are in the novel anti-HER2 ADCs group and 67 are in the HP combined with chemotherapy. Among these novel anti-HER2 ADCs, 36 patients received treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd), and 47 patients received treatment with other new types of ADCs. The median PFS of the novel anti-HER2 ADCs group and HP combined with the chemotherapy group were 7.0 months and 8.9 months, respectively, with ORR of 51.8% and 26.9%, and CBR of 69.9% and 65.7%, respectively. In subgroup, patients receiving T-Dxd showed improvement in PFS compared to the HP combined with chemotherapy group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the novel anti-HER2 ADCs group and the HP combined with chemotherapy group were neutropenia and gastrointestinal symptoms.

Conclusions: In HER2-positive MBC for whom TKI treatment has failed, novel anti-HER2 ADCs and the HP combined with chemotherapy regimen both showed moderate efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Novel anti-HER2 ADCs are the preferred treatment recommendation for TKI failure patients. Meanwhile, based on the results of this study, the HP combined with chemotherapy regimen may also be an option, especially for patients with low accessibility.

Cancer manifests through a spectrum of mutations, including gene fusions termed oncofusions. These structural alterations influence tumorigenesis across various cancer types. Oncofusions arise primarily from genomic rearrangements and operate through deregulation or hybrid gene formation mechanisms. Notable examples such as BCR::ABL and EWS::FLI1 underscore their clinical significance. Several case studies exemplify the role of identifying and targeting oncofusions in guiding treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes. However, challenges persist in discerning drivers from passenger mutations and addressing acquired resistance. Despite advancements, the complexity of oncofusions warrants further exploration of their full potential as therapeutic targets, requiring a multidisciplinary approach integrating genomics, functional studies, and innovative drug discovery strategies to achieve precision in medicine.

Introduction: We describe the safety of sotorasib monotherapy in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss practical recommendations for managing key risks.

Methods: Incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were pooled from 4 clinical trials: CodeBreaK 100 (NCT03600883), CodeBreaK 101 (NCT04185883), CodeBreaK 105 (NCT04380753), and CodeBreaK 200 (NCT04303780) and graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Adverse events were deemed sotorasib-related per investigator causality assessment.

Results: In the pooled population (n = 549), TRAEs were reported in 388 (70.7%) patients (grade 1: 124 [22.6%]; grade 2: 117 [21.3%]; grade ≥ 3: 147 [26.8%]). Gastrointestinal and hepatic TRAEs, including diarrhea (171 [31.1%]), nausea (80 [14.6%]), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 68 [12.4%]), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 67 [12.2%]) were the most common (≥10%). Dose interruption and dose reduction of sotorasib resulted in the resolution of >90% of diarrhea events; median time to resolution were 18.0 days and 22.0 days, respectively. Similar trends were observed for elevated ALT and AST events. Patients who stopped immunotherapy <3 months before initiating sotorasib had a higher incidence of treatment-related hepatotoxicity (80/240 [33.3%]) than those who stopped immunotherapy ≥3 months before initiating sotorasib (26/188 [13.8%]). Treatment-related pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease (ILD) and corrected QT (QTc) prolongation were observed in 9 (1.6%) and 4 (0.7%) patients, respectively. Two (0.4%) patients died with TRAEs, 1 with ILD whose ultimate cause of death was disease progression, and the other with an unknown cause.

Conclusions: Sotorasib has a well-characterized safety profile in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, and key risks are manageable with dose modification.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for patients with partially platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Methods: Patients with partially platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer were recruited in this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study. Eligible patients were given 4-6 cycles of PLD (40 mg/m2 on day 1, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life, and safety. Exploratory endpoints included the change trend of CA125 and platinum-free interval.

Results: Between June 2017 and November 2020, 167 eligible patients were included in the full analysis set. The median PFS and OS were 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.4-9.3 months) and 19.1 months (95% CI, 15.0-23.3 months), respectively. The ORR and DCR were 32.3% and 60.5%, respectively. The ORR (62.3 vs 22.5%) and DCR (84.9 vs 60.7%) of patients with a CA125 decrease after the first cycle were significantly higher than those without a CA125 decrease (all P < .05). Grade ≥ 3 and serious adverse events were reported in 9.9% and 3.9% of patients, respectively. No treatment-related death was observed.

Conclusion: PLD showed promising efficacy and manageable tolerability in patients with partially platinum-sensitive, platinum-resistant, or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900022962.

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a redoubtable challenge due to late-stage diagnosis and limited treatment options, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies.

Methods: Here, we report our results investigating the safety and efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), an FDA-approved oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1, in patients with advanced PDAC. Nine patients with treatment-refractory advanced PDAC received escalating doses of T-VEC via endoscopic injection.

Results: While no objective responses were observed, stable disease was achieved in 44% of patients, with a median overall survival of 7.8 months, including one patient who survived 28 months. Adverse events were manageable, with the maximum tolerated dose determined to be 108 PFU/mL.

Conclusion: Our findings underscore the feasibility of intratumoral T-VEC administration in advanced PDAC. Further investigation, particularly in combination with immunotherapies administered systemically is warranted to more optimally assess T-VEC in this challenging malignancy.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03086642.

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has a poor prognosis, necessitating the investigation of novel treatments and targets. This study evaluated JNJ-70218902 (JNJ-902), a T-cell redirector targeting transmembrane protein with epidermal growth factor-like and 2 follistatin-like domains 2 (TMEFF2) and cluster of differentiation 3, in mCRPC.

Patients and methods: Patients who had measurable/evaluable mCRPC after at least one novel androgen receptor-targeted therapy or chemotherapy were eligible. Participants received subcutaneous JNJ-902 0.3, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mg once weekly (QW) or 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, or 6.0 mg biweekly (Q2W). Study objectives included assessment of safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and preliminary efficacy.

Results: Eighty-two participants were enrolled to receive at least one dose of JNJ-902 (QW; n = 38; Q2W; n = 44). Median duration of treatment was 1.91 (0.0-19.4) months across dosing groups. All participants experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 76 (92.7%) experienced treatment-related TEAEs. Fourteen participants (17.1%) experienced a TEAE that led to study discontinuation, of which 3 (3.7%) were related to JNJ-902. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 participants (2.4%). Five participants (15.2%) with measurable disease had a confirmed partial response and 10 participants (12.2%) had ≥50% decrease from baseline prostate-specific antigen levels. Clinical activity was not dose related and no clear exposure-response relationship was observed.

Conclusions: In this study, dose escalation was limited by emerging dose-limiting toxicities. Although a recommended phase II dose was not determined, findings indicate TMEFF2 to be a potential target in mCRPC that warrants further investigation.

Over the last decade, multiple clinical trials have demonstrated a survival benefit for liver transplantation in colorectal cancer with liver metastases. Additionally, advances in donor organ preservation have expanded organ availability affording the opportunity to expand indications for liver transplantation, such as colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases. Current data support comparable overall survival (OS) for liver transplantation for colorectal cancer with liver metastases compared with general liver transplantation recipients. Supported by this data, in the United States, allocation policy is changing to include deceased donor livers for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Available studies to date demonstrate improved outcomes with primary tumor R0 resection, 6-12 months of pretransplantation chemotherapy, and careful radiologic restaging (including positron emission tomography/computed tomography) to confirm lack of extrahepatic disease. A response to pretransplantation chemotherapy is a key predictor of long-term outcomes and progression during chemotherapy appears to be a contraindication to proceeding to transplant. A carcinoembryonic antigen level ≤80 µg/L and largest liver tumor dimension <5.5 cm are both associated with improved progression-free and OS in the available literature. Liver transplantation for colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases is associated with longer progression-free and OS compared with chemotherapy alone. Patient selection based on imaging, laboratory, and clinical findings is critical to identify patients most likely to benefit. Liver transplantation should be considered at all centers with an active transplant program to improve outcomes for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Background: Circadian rhythms impact immune function; a previous study demonstrated that immunotherapy treatment times taking place later in the day correlated with poorer outcomes in patients with melanoma. However, this finding has not been replicated, and other infusion timing schemas are unexplored. The objective of this retrospective, cohort study was to determine if the time of immunotherapy infusion affects outcomes.

Materials and methods: Five hundred and sixteen participants age ≥18 years diagnosed with cutaneous, acral, mucosal, or unknown primary melanoma treated with >1 infusion of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or combination ipilimumab/PD-1 inhibitors were included. Response rate, toxicity rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined based on infusion timing.

Results: Patients with ≥1 late infusion (after 4 pm) among their first 4 infusions had slightly poorer objective response rate compared with only pre-4 pm infusions (39.7% vs 44.5%), but no significant associations with late infusions and PFS and OS (P = .23, .93, respectively). Multivariable analyses showed no statistically significant association with outcomes for patients with any post-4 pm infusion among the first 4; median infusion time was also not associated with outcomes. However, considering all infusion times, we found inferior PFS (median 10.6 vs 38.9 months, P < .0001), and numerically inferior OS (median 54.6 vs 81.2 months, P = .19) in patients with ≥20% late infusions. Multivariable models had similarly inferior response and PFS for patients with ≥20% late infusions, and later median infusion times were associated with inferior response, PFS, and OS.

Conclusions: Late immunotherapy infusion times were associated with inferior outcomes when considering all infusions, but not when considering initial (first 4) infusions.

This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status, recent advancements, and future directions in the management of metastatic spine disease using both radiotherapy and surgery. Emphasis has been put on the integrated use of radiotherapy and surgery, incorporating recent developments such as separation surgery, active dose sparing of the surgical field, and the implementation of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer implants. Future studies should explore the effects of minimizing the time between radiotherapy and surgery and investigate the potential of vertebral re-ossification after radiotherapy to obviate the need for stabilization surgery. Concerted efforts should be directed toward fostering multidisciplinary collaboration among radiation oncologists, spine surgeons, and medical oncologists.