Oncologist最新文献

Background: BRCA1/2 genes play a critical role in genome stability and DNA repair. In animal models, loss of cardiomyocyte-specific BRCA1/2 is associated with DNA damage, apoptosis, cardiac dysfunction, and mortality following anthracycline exposure. However, whether these preclinical findings translate to humans remains unclear.

Objective: Assess the impact of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) status on anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) in patients with early breast cancer and no prior anti-HER2 therapy.

Methods: This single-center retrospective/prospective cohort study focused on early breast cancer patients, treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the neo/adjuvant setting, no prior anti-HER2 therapy, and known gBRCA1/2 status, normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and no previous cardiovascular disease. Follow-up assessments involved myocardial dysfunction blood biomarkers (MDBB), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. The primary objective was LVEF changes comparing BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (gBRCA1/2m) vs non-carriers (gBRCA1/2wt). Secondary objectives included differences in MDBB and QoL.

Results: A total of 137 patients were included (103 gBRCA1/2wt and 34 gBRCA1/2m). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared to baseline, LVEF% reduction was -4.7[-12.0, 0.0] vs -9.5[-18.0, -5.0] in gBRCA1/2wt vs gBRCA1/2m, (P = .027). After adjusting for confounders, the difference in reduction in LVEF remained statistically significant at -4.5 [95%CI, -8.6, -0.4; P = .032]. No differences between MDBB (C-reactive protein, hsTnI, NT-proBNP, D-Dimer, ST-2, or Galectine-3) or QoL (MLHFQ and EQ5-D index) were detected.

Conclusions: gBRCA1/2m patients could represent a higher-risk population for AIC. gBRCA1/2 status should be one of the factors to consider in deciding on adjuvant anthracycline necessity. This population could benefit from a cardio-oncology closer follow-up and cardioprotective strategies.

Background: In BRAF-mutated high-risk melanoma, targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy have durable benefits as first-line (1L) adjuvant therapy. Based on differing action mechanisms of BRAF/MEK inhibitors and CPI immunotherapies, there is interest in evaluating the activity of 2L adjuvant targeted therapy in decreasing the risk of subsequent recurrence after repeat resection following relapse on/after 1L adjuvant CPI.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective review of BRAF V600-mutated resected stage III/IV melanoma patients in the United States, Australia, and The Netherlands who received 1L adjuvant CPI immunotherapy, relapsed locoregionally/distantly, were again resected to no evidence of disease, and received dabrafenib/trametinib (dab/tram) as 2L adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) from initiation of 2L adjuvant dab/tram (RFS-2), analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results: Thirty-eight patients were included (median age 50 years, 63% male, 87% stage III, median follow-up 19 months from 2L dab/tram initiation). Median dab/tram duration was 10.1 months (range: 1 day-22.7 months), with half discontinuing due to progression or adverse events. Median (95% CI) RFS-2 was 18.9 (14.9-28.1) months, with 91%, 81%, and 58% remaining relapse-free at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Most patients remained distant metastasis-free at 6, 12, and 18 months (97%, 85%, and 71%, respectively). Two patients were deceased at the last follow-up, with 97% alive at 18 months.

Conclusions: Over 80% of patients remained relapse- and metastasis-free at 12 months after 2L dab/tram initiation, with only 2 deaths observed. Dab/tram appears to have activity in the 2L adjuvant setting, although more follow-up is required.

Background: Even though it is preventable, cervical cancer contributes significantly to cancer-related mortality among Ethiopian women. Follow-up visits after treatment of precancerous lesions are essential to monitor lesion recurrence. In our previous study, we found a level of adherence to follow-up of 44.7%, but the reasons for low adherence have not been comprehensively explored within the Ethiopian context. This study aimed to identify these reasons by interviewing 167 women who had missed their follow-up appointments as well as 30 health professionals with experience in the field.

Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach: Quantitative data were collected through a telephone questionnaire conducted with 167 women who had a positive visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and had missed their follow-up appointments. Subsequently, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 healthcare professionals, and an inductive content analysis was carried out.

Results: In the patient interviews, the reasons given most often were "lack of information about the follow-up" (35; 21.1%), "forgetting the appointment" (30; 18.1%), and "not seeing the need for follow-up" (24; 14.5%). Healthcare professionals identified various reasons such as lack of knowledge, living in a remote area/changing living area, forgetfulness, fear, poor counseling, a shortage of trained healthcare providers to give counseling and follow-up, and reminder-related barriers.

Conclusion: Lack of knowledge, forgetfulness, poor health-seeking behavior, and a lack of reminders were identified as barriers contributing to the low uptake of rescreening. Further interventions should target these by creating community awareness, improving patient counseling, tracing patients in need of follow-up, and making reminder calls or using SMS.

Background: Convergent data suggest that advanced prostate cancer and coronary heart disease (CHD) share biological vulnerabilities that may be linked to adiposity. Here we explore whether leptin, as a marker and mediator of adiposity, could link prostate cancer to CHD.

Methods: Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled in a phase II trial (NCT02703623) studying androgen deprivation therapy, abiraterone, prednisone, and apalutamide were eligible if they had plasma and a chest CT scan available. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and adipokine levels were measured upon enrollment.

Results: Of 164 patients, 87% were white. The mean age was 65.6 ± 7.5 years, 88% were either overweight or obese, 59% had hypertension, 48% had hyperlipidemia (HLD), 20% had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 41% were former or current smokers. Coronary calcifications were found in 115 patients (70%). Among 47 patients with non-contrast chest CT scans, the median total CAC score was 133 AU (IQR 22.6-704.6). Four patients (9%) had a score of 0 AU (low risk) and 24 (51%) scores ≥100 AU, associated with high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. Leptin levels correlated positively with the right coronary artery (RCA) CAC score [Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ) = 0.3715 (P = .0142)]. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age, HLD, and higher leptin levels were independently associated with RCA calcification and a higher number of calcified coronary arteries.

Conclusion: Among men with mCRPC, there was a high burden of CHD, and higher leptin levels were associated with coronary atherosclerosis independently of traditional cardiac risk factors.

Background: Microsatellite instable (MSI) gastric cancers exhibit reduced lymph node (LN) metastasis and improved survival compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) counterparts. However, to our longstanding observation, clinical N-staging (cN) is frequently overestimated in MSI cases. The clinical implications and underlying mechanisms of this discrepancy warrant further investigation.

Materials and methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of clinicopathological data from a 141 MSI and 1119 MSS gastric cancer patients. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) and its receptor VEGFR-3 were assessed using qPCR and immunohistochemistry. High-parameter flow cytometry was employed to analyze subsets of CD8+ T cells within the tumors.

Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that MSI status was an independent prognostic factor, alongside the LN ratio and AJCC8 pathology staging. MSI gastric cancers exhibited a reduced LN ratio, particularly at advanced T-staging, compared to MSS counterparts, while maintaining an equivalent LN yield. Overestimation of cN by computed tomography preoperatively was frequent in MSI gastric cancers but was more commonly underestimated in MSS counterparts. VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 expression were lower in MSI tumors. MSI gastric cancers showed an increased total number of CD8+ T cells, albeit with a lower proportion of effector memory cells expressing CD45RA (EMRA) and CD8+ CXCR4+ T cells, compared to MSS counterparts.

Conclusion: Frequent overestimation of clinical N-staging in MSI gastric cancers is associated with VEGF-C signaling and CD8+ T-cell dynamics and should be cautiously interpreted, as it might misguide therapeutic options.

Introduction: The initial SARS-CoV-2 pandemic wave in Spain in 2020 precipitated significant paradigm shifts in gastrointestinal oncology patient management. This study captures the "Zeitgeist" of this period by analyzing adaptive strategies, treatment modifications, and survival outcomes, leveraging a 3-year follow-up perspective to extract insights from this unprecedented experience.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study utilizing the RETUD-TTD registry, encompassing 703 patients across 19 Spanish centers in April 2020. We evaluated alterations in clinical practice, therapeutic approaches, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related impacts, and patient survival. A Bayesian hierarchical model was employed to identify potential regional-specific frailties.

Results: The peak of the pandemic in April 2020 catalyzed substantial shifts in oncological care delivery. Outpatient consultations decreased by 13%, with a notable selection bias toward cases with more favorable prognostic indicators. Multidisciplinary tumor board discussions were significantly curtailed (eg, mean monthly colorectal cancer cases discussed was reduced from 40 to 23), compromising qualitative care measures. This occurred concurrently with an average of over 3 oncologists per center on medical leave. Contrary to initial concerns, the healthcare system demonstrated remarkable resilience. The majority of patients received standard-of-care therapies with regulatory approval, albeit with regimen modifications in 15% of cases. These adaptations included extended dosing intervals, dose intensity modulations, and transitions to oral formulations while maintaining unexpectedly stable long-term survival outcomes. The Bayesian frailty model detected minimal unmeasured prognostic factors related to geographic location, and the type of pandemic-induced adaptation did not significantly impact survival. The model revealed that coronavirus disease 2019's impact was less pronounced than other core prognostic variables.

Conclusions: The decentralized Spanish healthcare system exhibited substantial robustness in managing pre-pandemic diagnosed gastrointestinal malignancies, despite asymmetrical, and occasionally severe organizational disruptions. The insights gleaned from this experience could inform future crisis preparedness strategies and optimize care provision during subsequent public health emergencies.

Background: Disitamab vedotin (RC48-ADC), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), combines specific antibody disitamab with cytotoxicity monomethyl auristatin E to effectively target the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein on tumor cells for precise elimination. Recent studies have demonstrated that RC48-ADC offers therapeutic benefits for patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low-expression breast cancer (BC). However, a thorough exploration of its efficacy and safety in real-world settings for patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is currently lacking.

Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, real-world study included patients with mBC who received RC48-ADC from September 2021 to March 2024. These patients include HER2-positive BC and HER2-low-expression BC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), restricted mean survival time, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Factors affecting efficacy and the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were evaluated.

Results: The study included a cohort of 89 patients with mBC, with 48 of those being identified as HER2-positive. As of March 2024, 22 deaths were recorded, with an immature median OS. Total PFS varied from 1.0 to 31.2 months, with a median of 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.368-6.632). HER2-positive patients exhibited prolonged PFS compared with HER2-low-expression patients (6.6 months vs 4.1 months, P = .023). The overall ORR stood at 25.8% (95% CI, 0.178-0.358), with higher rates observed in HER2-positive patients compared with HER2-low-expression patients (31.3% vs 19.5%). Similarly, the overall DCR was 78.7% (95% CI, 0.691-0.859), with HER2-positive patients demonstrating superior DCR compared with HER2-low-expression patients (83.3% vs 73.2%). Notably, HER2 expression emerged as the primary determinant of RC48-ADC efficacy. The most prevalent TRAE among all patients included leukopenia (21.3%) and alopecia (20.2%).

Conclusion: RC48-ADC showcases promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with both HER2-positive and HER2-low-expression mBC.

Background: Many FDA-approved cancer therapies, whether as a multiagent combination or as a single agent, have demonstrated only modest clinical benefit. To investigate the drug development landscape, this analysis focuses on whether newly approved drugs are added to existing standards as combination therapy or replace a former drug as monotherapy.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of package inserts and corresponding trials for the treatment of nonhematology solid tumor malignancies from January 2011 to December 2023 was conducted to categorize an approval as monotherapy or combination therapy. Drug characteristics, treatment indications, study design, approval history, and efficacy results were compared between the 2 cohorts.

Results: Among the 292 approval entries and 110 drugs, 193 (66.1%) were monotherapies and 99 (33.9%) were combinations. Combinations, when compared with monotherapies, were more frequently approved as regular than accelerated approval (85 [85.9%] vs 132 [68.4%], P <.01), in the first-line setting (66 [66.7%] vs 69 [35.8%], P <.01), and with overall survival as the criteria (49 [49.5%] vs 40 [20.7%], P <.01). Monotherapies were more likely to be novel drugs compared with combinations (80 [41.5%] vs 14 [14.1%] P <.01). Monotherapies were more likely to be small molecule targeted agents, while combinations were more likely to be immunotherapies (P <.02). There was no difference comparing the time-to-event endpoints and validated clinical benefit scale, but the median response rate of combinations (46%) was higher than monotherapies (34%, P <.01).

Discussion: Given that clinical benefit appears limited in combination therapy compared with monotherapy, drug development could focus on simplifying cancer therapies toward patient-centered paradigms.

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with large brain metastases (BrM) defined as >2 cm in diameter historically face grim prognoses. With immunotherapy emerging as a promising avenue for BrM management and being commonly used in NSCLC, its application in addressing large BrM remains underexplored.

Methods: This retrospective study conducted across the MedStar Georgetown Cancer Network aimed to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-biomarker driven NSCLC patients with large BrM following initial treatment.

Results: Thirty-six patients were included, all of whom underwent neurosurgery and/or radiation before commencing immunotherapy. The median intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) reached 31 months. Utilizing multivariable Cox penalized regression, the intracranial PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.07 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.26) for patients who received at least 90 days of immunotherapy compared to those who did not. Each additional 30 days of immunotherapy was associated with an OS HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.90).

Conclusion: This real-world data highlights the potential of immunotherapy in large BrM NSCLC patients, a population often excluded from clinical trials. This study contributes insights that can inform future treatment approaches, emphasizing the need for further exploration of immunotherapy's role in enhancing outcomes for this challenging patient population.