Coline Montégut, Claire Falandry, Saverio Cinieri, Claire Cropet, Laure Montane, Frédérique Rousseau, Florence Joly, Malak Moubarak, Anna M Mosconi, Eva M Guerra-Alía, Christian Schauer, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Ignace Vergote, Gabriella Parma, Gabriel Lindahl, Amélie Anota, Ulrich Canzler, Frederik Marmé, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Renaud Sabatier
Background: In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1.
Methods: Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered.
Results: Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, -0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [-0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34).
Conclusion: Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).
背景:在PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25中,在贝伐单抗维持治疗中加入奥拉帕尼可提高新诊断的晚期卵巢癌患者的总生存期。我们描述了PAOLA-1中老年患者的安全性和生活质量(QoL)。方法:收集安全性(CTCAE v4.03)和生活质量(EORTC生活质量问卷Core 30和Ovarian 28)数据。我们比较了年龄(≥70岁)和结果:在随机分配的806例患者中,142例年龄≥70岁(含奥拉帕尼组:n = 104;安慰剂组:n = 38)。老年患者接受奥拉帕尼治疗的安全性与年轻患者相似,除了所有级别淋巴细胞减少和≥3级高血压的发生率更高(31.7% vs 21.6%, P =。032和26.9% vs 16.7%, P =。019年,分别)。无血液学恶性肿瘤报告。随机化两年后,奥拉帕尼组的平均全球健康状况和认知功能似乎比单独使用贝伐单抗组更好(调整后的平均差异分别为+4.47点[95% CI, -0.49至9.42]和+4.82点[-0.57至10.21]),两组之间的其他生活质量项目相似。在含奥拉帕尼组中,基线GVS≥1的老年患者(n = 48)比GVS为0的患者(n = 34)表现出更高的毒性和更差的生活质量。结论:在PAOLA-1的老年患者中,奥拉帕尼联合贝伐单抗具有可控的安全性,对生活质量无不良影响。需要更多的数据来在更多的易感患者中证实这些结果。
{"title":"Safety and quality of life with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients with ovarian cancer: subgroup analysis of PAOLA‑1/ENGOT-ov25.","authors":"Coline Montégut, Claire Falandry, Saverio Cinieri, Claire Cropet, Laure Montane, Frédérique Rousseau, Florence Joly, Malak Moubarak, Anna M Mosconi, Eva M Guerra-Alía, Christian Schauer, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Ignace Vergote, Gabriella Parma, Gabriel Lindahl, Amélie Anota, Ulrich Canzler, Frederik Marmé, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Renaud Sabatier","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae322","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, -0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [-0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142824766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: Comparative effectiveness of netupitant-palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus aprepitant-based regimens in mitigating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae352","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae352","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142814672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Howard J Lee, John Boscardin, Louise C Walter, Alexander K Smith, Harvey J Cohen, Smith Giri, Grant R Williams, Carolyn J Presley, Surbhi Singhal, Li-Wen Huang, Ana I Velazquez, Matthew A Gubens, Collin M Blakely, Claire K Mulvey, Michael L Cheng, Lori C Sakoda, Lawrence H Kushi, Charles Quesenberry, Raymond Liu, Sara Fleszar-Pavlovic, Caroline Eskandar, Edward Cutler, Anne Marie Mercurio, Melisa L Wong
Introduction: Among older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy, frailty indices predict OS and toxicity. Given the increased use of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), we evaluated frailty and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) among older adults with aNSCLC receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or targeted therapy.
Methods: Patients aged ≥ 65 with aNSCLC starting systemic therapy with non-curative intent underwent geriatric assessments over 6 months. We developed a deficit-accumulation frailty index to categorize patients as robust, pre-frail, or frail. To evaluate associations between frailty and KPS with OS, we used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for race, insurance, and treatment. We used logistic regression to evaluate hospitalizations, functional decline, and severe toxicity.
Results: Among 155 patients (median age 73), 45.8% were robust, 36.1% pre-frail, and 18.2% frail; 34.8% had a KPS ≥ 90, 32.9% had a KPS of 80, and 32.3% had a KPS ≤ 70. The median OS was 17.9 months. Pre-frail/frail patients had worse OS compared to robust patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.09, 95% CI, 1.31-3.34) and were more likely to be hospitalized (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% CI, 1.09-4.48), functionally decline (adjusted OR 2.29, 95% CI, 1.09-4.78), and experience grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity (adjusted OR 5.18, 95% CI, 1.02-26.03). KPS was only associated with OS.
Conclusions: Our frailty index was associated with OS, hospitalization, functional decline, and hematologic AEs among older adults with aNSCLC receiving systemic therapies, while KPS was only associated with OS. Pretreatment frailty assessment may help identify older adults at risk for poor outcomes to optimize decision-making and supportive care.
{"title":"Associations of frailty with survival, hospitalization, functional decline, and toxicity among older adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Howard J Lee, John Boscardin, Louise C Walter, Alexander K Smith, Harvey J Cohen, Smith Giri, Grant R Williams, Carolyn J Presley, Surbhi Singhal, Li-Wen Huang, Ana I Velazquez, Matthew A Gubens, Collin M Blakely, Claire K Mulvey, Michael L Cheng, Lori C Sakoda, Lawrence H Kushi, Charles Quesenberry, Raymond Liu, Sara Fleszar-Pavlovic, Caroline Eskandar, Edward Cutler, Anne Marie Mercurio, Melisa L Wong","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae349","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Among older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy, frailty indices predict OS and toxicity. Given the increased use of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), we evaluated frailty and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) among older adults with aNSCLC receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥ 65 with aNSCLC starting systemic therapy with non-curative intent underwent geriatric assessments over 6 months. We developed a deficit-accumulation frailty index to categorize patients as robust, pre-frail, or frail. To evaluate associations between frailty and KPS with OS, we used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for race, insurance, and treatment. We used logistic regression to evaluate hospitalizations, functional decline, and severe toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 155 patients (median age 73), 45.8% were robust, 36.1% pre-frail, and 18.2% frail; 34.8% had a KPS ≥ 90, 32.9% had a KPS of 80, and 32.3% had a KPS ≤ 70. The median OS was 17.9 months. Pre-frail/frail patients had worse OS compared to robust patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.09, 95% CI, 1.31-3.34) and were more likely to be hospitalized (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% CI, 1.09-4.48), functionally decline (adjusted OR 2.29, 95% CI, 1.09-4.78), and experience grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity (adjusted OR 5.18, 95% CI, 1.02-26.03). KPS was only associated with OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our frailty index was associated with OS, hospitalization, functional decline, and hematologic AEs among older adults with aNSCLC receiving systemic therapies, while KPS was only associated with OS. Pretreatment frailty assessment may help identify older adults at risk for poor outcomes to optimize decision-making and supportive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142808716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Early onset Colorectal Cancer (EOCRC), defined as those diagnosed under the age of 50, has been increasing rapidly since 1970. UK data on EOCRC are currently limited and better understanding of the condition is needed.
Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective study of patients with EOCRC treated over 9 years (2013-2021) at a large UK cancer center was performed. Clinicopathological features, risk factors, molecular drivers, treatment, and survival were analyzed.
Results: In total, 203 patients were included. A significant increase in cases was reported from 2018-2019 (n = 33) to 2020-2021 (n = 118). Sporadic EOCRC accounted for 70% of cases and left-sided tumors represented 70.9% (n = 144). Median duration of symptoms was 3 months, while 52.7% of the patients had de-novo metastatic disease. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy was 6 months (95% CI, 4.85-7.15) and median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95% CI, 32.86-43.14). In the advanced setting, left-sided primary tumors were associated with a median OS benefit of 14 months over right-sided primaries (28 vs 14 months, P = .009). Finally, primary tumor resection was associated with median OS benefit of 21 months compared with in situ tumors (38 vs 17 months, P < .001).
Conclusions: The incidence of EOCRC is increasing, and survival outcomes remain modest. Raising public awareness and lowering the age for colorectal cancer screening are directions that could improve EOCRC clinical outcomes. There is also a need for large prospective studies to improve the understanding of the nature of EOCRC and the best therapeutic approaches.
{"title":"Is early-onset colorectal cancer an evolving pandemic? Real-world data from a tertiary cancer center.","authors":"Angelos Angelakas, Thekla Christodoulou, Konstantinos Kamposioras, Jorge Barriuso, Michael Braun, Jurjees Hasan, Kalena Marti, Vivek Misra, Saifee Mullamitha, Mark Saunders, Natalie Cook","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae239","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early onset Colorectal Cancer (EOCRC), defined as those diagnosed under the age of 50, has been increasing rapidly since 1970. UK data on EOCRC are currently limited and better understanding of the condition is needed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study of patients with EOCRC treated over 9 years (2013-2021) at a large UK cancer center was performed. Clinicopathological features, risk factors, molecular drivers, treatment, and survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 203 patients were included. A significant increase in cases was reported from 2018-2019 (n = 33) to 2020-2021 (n = 118). Sporadic EOCRC accounted for 70% of cases and left-sided tumors represented 70.9% (n = 144). Median duration of symptoms was 3 months, while 52.7% of the patients had de-novo metastatic disease. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy was 6 months (95% CI, 4.85-7.15) and median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95% CI, 32.86-43.14). In the advanced setting, left-sided primary tumors were associated with a median OS benefit of 14 months over right-sided primaries (28 vs 14 months, P = .009). Finally, primary tumor resection was associated with median OS benefit of 21 months compared with in situ tumors (38 vs 17 months, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of EOCRC is increasing, and survival outcomes remain modest. Raising public awareness and lowering the age for colorectal cancer screening are directions that could improve EOCRC clinical outcomes. There is also a need for large prospective studies to improve the understanding of the nature of EOCRC and the best therapeutic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1680-e1691"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630742/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Luis E Raez, Ashish C Massey, Scott S Barker, Patrick M Peterson, Katherine Liming, Nathan A Pennell
Background: Selpercatinib is a selective RET inhibitor approved for treatment of RET-activated cancers. Adverse events (AEs) are manageable with dose modifications. This post hoc analysis characterized selpercatinib's clinical safety profile after long-term follow-up in the safety population of LIBRETTO-001.
Patients and methods: LIBRETTO-001 is an ongoing phase I/II, single-arm, open-label trial (NCT03157128). Eligible patients were ≥18 years old with diagnosis of advanced/metastatic RET fusion-positive solid tumor, RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer, or other RET-activated tumors. In phase I, patients received selpercatinib 20 mg QD or 20-240 mg BID; patients in phase II received 160 mg BID. The analyzed population comprised all patients who received ≥1 selpercatinib dose and were followed up until data cutoff (January 13, 2023).
Results: For the 837 patients, median follow-up was 45.4 months (95% CI, 44.5-46.6); median time on treatment was 30.1 months (range 0.1-66.8). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 76.2% of patients; most common events were hypertension (19.7%), ALT increased (11.8%), and hyponatremia (9.2%). Serious TEAEs were reported in 51.4% of patients. Most frequently reported any-grade AEs at <6 months of treatment were fatigue (36.6%), dry mouth (32.8%), and ALT increased (30.5%); at ≥24 months of treatment, these were edema (63.2%), diarrhea (60.7%), and fatigue (53.0%). Selpercatinib-related TEAEs leading to reduced dosage were reported in 39.3%, those leading to treatment interruption were reported in 47.1%, and those leading to discontinuation were reported in 4.3% of patients.
Conclusion: Long-term treatment with selpercatinib is feasible. AEs are manageable with dose modifications, allowing most patients to continue safely on therapy.
{"title":"Long-term safety of selpercatinib for Rearranged during transfection (RET)-activated advanced solid tumors in LIBRETTO-001: differing patterns of adverse events over time.","authors":"Luis E Raez, Ashish C Massey, Scott S Barker, Patrick M Peterson, Katherine Liming, Nathan A Pennell","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae282","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae282","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selpercatinib is a selective RET inhibitor approved for treatment of RET-activated cancers. Adverse events (AEs) are manageable with dose modifications. This post hoc analysis characterized selpercatinib's clinical safety profile after long-term follow-up in the safety population of LIBRETTO-001.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>LIBRETTO-001 is an ongoing phase I/II, single-arm, open-label trial (NCT03157128). Eligible patients were ≥18 years old with diagnosis of advanced/metastatic RET fusion-positive solid tumor, RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer, or other RET-activated tumors. In phase I, patients received selpercatinib 20 mg QD or 20-240 mg BID; patients in phase II received 160 mg BID. The analyzed population comprised all patients who received ≥1 selpercatinib dose and were followed up until data cutoff (January 13, 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 837 patients, median follow-up was 45.4 months (95% CI, 44.5-46.6); median time on treatment was 30.1 months (range 0.1-66.8). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 76.2% of patients; most common events were hypertension (19.7%), ALT increased (11.8%), and hyponatremia (9.2%). Serious TEAEs were reported in 51.4% of patients. Most frequently reported any-grade AEs at <6 months of treatment were fatigue (36.6%), dry mouth (32.8%), and ALT increased (30.5%); at ≥24 months of treatment, these were edema (63.2%), diarrhea (60.7%), and fatigue (53.0%). Selpercatinib-related TEAEs leading to reduced dosage were reported in 39.3%, those leading to treatment interruption were reported in 47.1%, and those leading to discontinuation were reported in 4.3% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term treatment with selpercatinib is feasible. AEs are manageable with dose modifications, allowing most patients to continue safely on therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"1068-1078"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630769/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142548955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The value of serum biomarkers, particularly alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), gains increasing attention in prognostic evaluation and recurrence monitoring for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study investigated the implications of serological incomplete conversion (SIC) of these 2 biomarkers as prognostic indicators for long-term outcomes after HCC resection.
Methods: A multicenter observational study was conducted on a cohort of HCC patients presenting with AFP (>20 ng/mL) or PIVKA-II (>40 mAU/mL) positivity who underwent curative-intent resection. Based on their postoperative AFP and PIVKA-II levels at first postoperative follow-up (4~8 weeks after surgery), these patients were stratified into the serological incomplete conversion (SIC) and serological complete conversion (SCC) groups. The study endpoints were recurrence and overall survival (OS).
Results: Among 1755 patients, 379 and 1376 were categorized as having SIC and SCC, respectively. The SIC group exhibited 1- and 5-year OS rates of 67.5% and 26.3%, with the corresponding recurrence rates of 53.2% and 79.0%, respectively; while the SCC group displayed 1- and 5-year OS rates of 95.8% and 62.5%, with the corresponding recurrence rates of 16.8% and 48.8%, respectively (both P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that postoperative SIC was an independent risk factor for both increased recurrence (HR: 2.40, 95% CI, 2.04-2.81, P < .001) and decreased OS (HR: 2.69, 95% CI, 2.24-3.24, P < .001).
Conclusion: The results emphasize that postoperative incomplete conversion of either AFP or PIVKA-II is a significant prognostic marker, indicating a higher risk for adverse oncologic outcomes following HCC resection. This revelation has crucial implications for refining postoperative adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategies for HCC patients.
{"title":"Prognostic significance of postoperative serological incomplete conversion of AFP and PIVKA-II after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 1755 patients.","authors":"Mingda Wang, Guojun Qian, Hongmei Xiao, Xingkai Liu, Liyang Sun, Zhong Chen, Kongying Lin, Lanqing Yao, Chao Li, Lihui Gu, Jiahao Xu, Xiaodong Sun, Wei Qiu, Timothy M Pawlik, Wan Yee Lau, Guoyue Lv, Feng Shen, Tian Yang","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae139","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The value of serum biomarkers, particularly alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), gains increasing attention in prognostic evaluation and recurrence monitoring for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study investigated the implications of serological incomplete conversion (SIC) of these 2 biomarkers as prognostic indicators for long-term outcomes after HCC resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter observational study was conducted on a cohort of HCC patients presenting with AFP (>20 ng/mL) or PIVKA-II (>40 mAU/mL) positivity who underwent curative-intent resection. Based on their postoperative AFP and PIVKA-II levels at first postoperative follow-up (4~8 weeks after surgery), these patients were stratified into the serological incomplete conversion (SIC) and serological complete conversion (SCC) groups. The study endpoints were recurrence and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1755 patients, 379 and 1376 were categorized as having SIC and SCC, respectively. The SIC group exhibited 1- and 5-year OS rates of 67.5% and 26.3%, with the corresponding recurrence rates of 53.2% and 79.0%, respectively; while the SCC group displayed 1- and 5-year OS rates of 95.8% and 62.5%, with the corresponding recurrence rates of 16.8% and 48.8%, respectively (both P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that postoperative SIC was an independent risk factor for both increased recurrence (HR: 2.40, 95% CI, 2.04-2.81, P < .001) and decreased OS (HR: 2.69, 95% CI, 2.24-3.24, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results emphasize that postoperative incomplete conversion of either AFP or PIVKA-II is a significant prognostic marker, indicating a higher risk for adverse oncologic outcomes following HCC resection. This revelation has crucial implications for refining postoperative adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategies for HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1723-e1733"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141441154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Espying sarcopenia in gastric cancer: squaring the circle.","authors":"Ahmad J Abdulsalam, Murat Kara","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae222","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae222","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1894"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630755/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachel B Keller-Evans, Daniela Munafo, Tristen Ross, Sarah Rudawsky, Andrej Savol, Richard S P Huang
While there is great potential for unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches-eg, whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS)-for exploration, discovery, and clinical application in the realm of oncology, there are limitations that should be considered when relying on these methodologies for clinical decision making. When using WTS for the detection of clinically relevant gene fusions in tumor specimens, a key consideration is whether a limited coverage depth (approximately 30-50X) is sufficient for detecting these events, especially in samples with low tumor purity. We demonstrate the reduced sensitivity of both a commercial WTS assay for the detection of clinically relevant fusions in analytical validation control samples and of a research use only (RUO) WTS assay for the detection of clinically relevant fusions in real-world clinical samples compared to RNA comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Notably, the RUO WTS assay would not have reported 30% (6/20) of fusions detected using RNA CGP assays in fusion-positive tumor samples, highlighting a potential disadvantage of broader sequencing.
{"title":"Breadth versus depth: whole transcriptome sequencing has reduced sensitivity for detection of clinically relevant fusions compared to RNA comprehensive genomic profiling.","authors":"Rachel B Keller-Evans, Daniela Munafo, Tristen Ross, Sarah Rudawsky, Andrej Savol, Richard S P Huang","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae226","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While there is great potential for unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches-eg, whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS)-for exploration, discovery, and clinical application in the realm of oncology, there are limitations that should be considered when relying on these methodologies for clinical decision making. When using WTS for the detection of clinically relevant gene fusions in tumor specimens, a key consideration is whether a limited coverage depth (approximately 30-50X) is sufficient for detecting these events, especially in samples with low tumor purity. We demonstrate the reduced sensitivity of both a commercial WTS assay for the detection of clinically relevant fusions in analytical validation control samples and of a research use only (RUO) WTS assay for the detection of clinically relevant fusions in real-world clinical samples compared to RNA comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Notably, the RUO WTS assay would not have reported 30% (6/20) of fusions detected using RNA CGP assays in fusion-positive tumor samples, highlighting a potential disadvantage of broader sequencing.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1786-e1789"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630735/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142094160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tejaswini M Dhawale, Roopa S Bhat, P Connor Johnson, Shanivi Srikonda, Kelsey S Lau-Min, Kofi Boateng, Howard Lee, Hermioni L Amonoo, Ryan Nipp, Charlotta Lindvall, Areej El-Jawahri
Purpose: Little is known about serious illness conversations (SIC) conducted during telemedicine visits and their impact on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.
Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis telemedicine visits for patients with metastatic lung cancer conducted during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic (October 3, 2020-October 6, 2020). We used natural language processing (NLP) to characterize documentation of SIC domains (ie, goals of care [GOC], limitation of life-sustaining treatment [LLST], prognostic awareness [PA], palliative care [PC], and hospice). We used unadjusted logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with SIC documentation and the relationship between SIC documentation and EOL outcomes.
Results: The study included 634 telemedicine visits across 360 patients. Documentation of at least one SIC domain was present in 188 (29.7%) visits with GOC and PA being the most discussed domains. Family presence (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = .004), progressive or newly diagnosed disease (OR, 5.42; P < .000), age ≥ 70 (OR, 1.80; P = .009), and male sex (OR, 2.23; P < .000) were associated with a greater likelihood of discussing ≥ 1 SIC domain. Of the 61 patients who died within 12 months of the study period, having ≥ 1 SIC domain discussed was associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (OR, 0.27; P = .020).
Conclusion: In this study of telehealth visits, we identified important factors associated with an increased likelihood of having documentation of an SIC and demonstrated that SIC documentation correlated with lower likelihood of hospitalization at EOL.
目的:人们对在远程医疗访问期间进行的重病对话(SIC)及其对晚期癌症患者生命末期(EOL)结局的影响知之甚少:我们对 COVID-19 大流行期间(2020 年 10 月 3 日至 2020 年 10 月 6 日)转移性肺癌患者的远程医疗就诊进行了回顾性分析。我们使用自然语言处理 (NLP) 来描述 SIC 领域(即护理目标 [GOC]、维持生命治疗的限制 [LLST]、预后意识 [PA]、姑息治疗 [PC] 和临终关怀)的文档特征。我们使用未经调整的逻辑回归法评估了与 SIC 文件相关的因素以及 SIC 文件与临终关怀结果之间的关系:这项研究包括 360 名患者的 634 次远程医疗就诊。188人次(29.7%)至少有一个SIC领域的记录,其中GOC和PA是讨论最多的领域。在这项关于远程医疗就诊的研究中,我们发现了与记录 SIC 的可能性增加相关的重要因素,并证明 SIC 记录与临终时住院的可能性降低相关。
{"title":"Telemedicine-based serious illness conversations, healthcare utilization, and end of life care among patients with advanced lung cancer.","authors":"Tejaswini M Dhawale, Roopa S Bhat, P Connor Johnson, Shanivi Srikonda, Kelsey S Lau-Min, Kofi Boateng, Howard Lee, Hermioni L Amonoo, Ryan Nipp, Charlotta Lindvall, Areej El-Jawahri","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae216","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Little is known about serious illness conversations (SIC) conducted during telemedicine visits and their impact on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis telemedicine visits for patients with metastatic lung cancer conducted during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic (October 3, 2020-October 6, 2020). We used natural language processing (NLP) to characterize documentation of SIC domains (ie, goals of care [GOC], limitation of life-sustaining treatment [LLST], prognostic awareness [PA], palliative care [PC], and hospice). We used unadjusted logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with SIC documentation and the relationship between SIC documentation and EOL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 634 telemedicine visits across 360 patients. Documentation of at least one SIC domain was present in 188 (29.7%) visits with GOC and PA being the most discussed domains. Family presence (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = .004), progressive or newly diagnosed disease (OR, 5.42; P < .000), age ≥ 70 (OR, 1.80; P = .009), and male sex (OR, 2.23; P < .000) were associated with a greater likelihood of discussing ≥ 1 SIC domain. Of the 61 patients who died within 12 months of the study period, having ≥ 1 SIC domain discussed was associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (OR, 0.27; P = .020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study of telehealth visits, we identified important factors associated with an increased likelihood of having documentation of an SIC and demonstrated that SIC documentation correlated with lower likelihood of hospitalization at EOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1762-e1769"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142114851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jennifer J Gile, Matthew Maurer, Gordon J Ruan, Jithma P Abeykoon, Joy R Heimgartner, Nikola A Baumann, Molly McMahon, Yi Lin, Thomas E Witzig
Magnesium (Mg) is an essential element involved in cellular metabolism. We demonstrated that in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), those with a serum Mg < 2.0 mg/dL at the time of transplant had worse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to learn the prognostic value of low serum Mg in patients with untreated DLBCL. We analyzed serum from 408 patients and tested 2 Mg cutpoints-low (<1.7 mg/dL) and low normal (<2.0 mg/dL), a range we found associated with lower survival in the SCT group. We found 3% of patients with low levels and 23% with low normal levels. Low normal serum Mg levels were associated with a higher stage at diagnosis, more extranodal involvement, higher international prognostic index score, lower overall survival (OS), and event-free survival. These data warrant testing Mg replacement to a target of >2.0 mg/dL to learn if survival can be improved.
{"title":"Low magnesium levels and prognosis in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.","authors":"Jennifer J Gile, Matthew Maurer, Gordon J Ruan, Jithma P Abeykoon, Joy R Heimgartner, Nikola A Baumann, Molly McMahon, Yi Lin, Thomas E Witzig","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae255","DOIUrl":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnesium (Mg) is an essential element involved in cellular metabolism. We demonstrated that in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), those with a serum Mg < 2.0 mg/dL at the time of transplant had worse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to learn the prognostic value of low serum Mg in patients with untreated DLBCL. We analyzed serum from 408 patients and tested 2 Mg cutpoints-low (<1.7 mg/dL) and low normal (<2.0 mg/dL), a range we found associated with lower survival in the SCT group. We found 3% of patients with low levels and 23% with low normal levels. Low normal serum Mg levels were associated with a higher stage at diagnosis, more extranodal involvement, higher international prognostic index score, lower overall survival (OS), and event-free survival. These data warrant testing Mg replacement to a target of >2.0 mg/dL to learn if survival can be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1779-e1782"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142481141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}