Oncologist最新文献

Objectives: Fatigue is a common nonhematologic toxicity of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with prevalence rates of clinician-rated all-grade and grade 3/4 fatigue of 39.2% and 2.5%, respectively. We prospectively assessed the incidence of fatigue emerging on palbociclib using patient-reported measures and explored potential predictors.

Methods: Eighty-eight patients with HR+ HER2- MBC without fatigue initiating palbociclib with endocrine therapy were assessed before and monthly across the initial 6 cycles. Clinically meaningful levels of patient-reported fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale, FACIT-F < 34), severity of, and functional interference due to fatigue (NCI Patient-Reported Outcomes for CTCAE, PRO-CTCAE) were assessed. Hematologic and nonhematologic predictors were examined pretreatment and concurrent with fatigue assessments.

Results: Patient-reported fatigue emerged in 21/88 patients [incidence rate 23.9% (95%CI, 15.4%-34.1%)] within 2.8 ± 1.7 treatment cycles. PRO-CTCAE-rated incidence rate of severe fatigue and fatigue interference was 14.8% (95%CI, 8.1%-23.9%) and 10.2% (95%CI, 4.8%-18.5%), respectively. Lower pretreatment absolute neutrophil count (ANC) levels predicted treatment-emergent fatigue (P =.01), but ANC levels on treatment did not (P =.78). Other pretreatment predictors were long sleep duration (P =.02) and low physical activity (trend, P =.07). Treatment-emergent fatigue was associated with objectively measured long sleep duration on treatment (P =.02), but not other measures (P ≥.35).

Conclusions: One-quarter of patients with HR+ HER2- MBC initiating palbociclib report rapidly emergent clinically meaningful fatigue, often with severe symptoms and functional interference. Treatment-emergent fatigue is associated with both pretreatment (lower ANC levels, longer sleep duration) and on-treatment (long sleep duration) hematologic and nonhematologic profiles.

Introduction: Patients with advanced cancer and their spousal caregivers who parent minor children report unmet parenting concerns and increased psychological distress. Seeking to address these important supportive care needs, this RCT examined the feasibility, acceptability, and initial evidence for the efficacy of a novel psychosocial intervention.

Patients and methods: Patients with a metastatic solid malignancy and their spouses completed self-reported validated assessments of psychological symptoms and cancer-related parenting outcomes and were then randomized to the parent support intervention or a usual care (UC) group. Both groups were reassessed 6 and 12 weeks later. Dyads randomized to the counselor-led intervention attended the first 2 sessions jointly addressing illness communication and family routines. Spouses individually attended the last 2 sessions focusing on caregiver support and family death preparedness.

Results: Fifty patients and their spouses were randomized. All a priori feasibility benchmarks were met. Attendance in the intervention arm was high with 84% of caregivers attending all 4 sessions (mean = 3.48). The program was evaluated favorably by all patients and spouses deeming the intervention as beneficial. Caregivers rated the individual-level sessions as particularly helpful. Multilevel analyses revealed a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms (P = .05) and improvement in parenting efficacy (P = .03) at 6-week follow-up in the intervention group compared with UC.

Conclusions: The initial testing of our parent support intervention yielded promising results regarding feasibility and preliminary evidence for efficacy for reduced anxiety symptoms and improved parenting efficacy. This program may meet a frequent and distressing psychosocial need that is typically unaddressed by multidisciplinary oncology teams.

Background: Cachexia is characterized by weight loss and decline in muscle mass and function and is a poor prognostic factor among patients with cancer. Patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive remarkable survival benefits with osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It is not known whether patients treated with osimertinib experience any weight loss or whether weight loss impacts patient outcomes. Therefore, we sought to describe the frequency and consequences of weight loss in this patient population.

Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective pilot study of 56 patients treated with first-line osimertinib for metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We defined on-treatment weight loss as a loss of ≥5% body weight at 6 or 12 months of treatment. We described the characteristics of patients with and without on-treatment weight loss and differences in progression-free survival (PFS), time on treatment with osimertinib, and overall survival (OS).

Results: Forty-six percent (n = 26) of patients met the criteria for on-treatment weight loss. There were no significant differences in patient or disease characteristics between patients with and without weight loss. Compared to patients without weight loss, patients with weight loss had similar PFS and time on treatment with osimertinib. Yet, patients with weight loss had significantly worse overall survival (HR 4.91, 95% CI, 1.56-15.5, P = .007).

Conclusion: Weight loss was observed in nearly half of patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib, and patients with weight loss had significantly worse overall survival.

Background: UV-related DNA damage signature (UVsig) is highly specific for cutaneous cancers. The prevalence of UVsig among tumors without a primary site and tumors of extracutaneous origin were previously reported, suggesting potential misclassification of cancers. Our study aims to assess if the knowledge of UVsig at diagnosis would change first-line treatment recommendation.

Methods: The main outcome was the potential clinical impact (PCI) of UVsig. High PCI was defined as UVsig leading to change in diagnosis and first-line therapy. Medium PCI was a change in diagnosis, but appropriate therapy was offered. Low PCI group had diagnosis modified by clinicians and treated as cutaneous cancer independently of UVsig.

Results: Among 5565 cases, 650 (12%) were positive for a UVsig. In the cancer of unknown primary group: 20 (49%), 9 (22%), and 12 (29%) cases were categorized in the high, medium, and low PCI group, respectively. In the cancer of extracutaneous origin cohort: 22 (54%), 15 (36%), and 4 (10%) cases were high, medium, and low PCI, respectively. The diagnosis would have changed in 14% of Veterans with UVsig positive tumor. Among all high PCI cases, 37 (88%) received chemotherapy that was not indicated based on a UVsig-informed diagnosis of cutaneous malignancy.

Conclusion: Our study suggested that UVsig would lead to revision of the working clinical diagnosis and significantly alter the first-line treatment in at least half of cancers of unknown primary or extracutaneous origin with UVsig. Knowledge of UVsig could lead to more effective and less toxic therapy for patients with cancer.

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B.

Patients and methods: We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy.

Results: Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival.

Conclusion: Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

Background: Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive primary central nervous system tumor characterized by poor outcomes. In case of relapse or progression to adjuvant chemotherapy, there is no univocal preferred regimen for relapsing glioblastoma.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian trial-level network meta-analyses (NMA) to identify the regimens associated with the best outcomes. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rates (ORR). We estimated separate treatment rankings based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. Only phase II/III prospective comparative trials were included.

Results: Twenty-four studies (3733 patients and 27 different therapies) were ultimately included. Twenty-three different regimens were compared for OS, 21 for PFS, and 26 for ORR. When taking lomustine as a common comparator, only regorafenib was likely to be significantly superior in terms of OS (hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% credible interval: 0.33-0.75). Regorafenib was significantly superior to other 16 (69.6%) regimens, including NovoTTF-100A, bevacizumab monotherapy, and several bevacizumab-based combinations. Regarding PFS and ORR, no treatment was clearly superior to the others.

Conclusions: This NMA supports regorafenib as one of the best available options for relapsing/refractory glioblastoma. Lomustine, NovoTTF-100A, and bevacizumab emerge as other viable alternative regimens. However, evidence on regorafenib is controversial at best. Moreover, most studies were underpowered, with varying inclusion criteria and primary endpoints, and no longer adapted to the most recent glioblastoma classification. A paradigmatic change in clinical trials' design for relapsing/refractory glioblastoma and more effective treatments are urgently required.

Background: In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1.

Methods: Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered.

Results: Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, -0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [-0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34).

Conclusion: Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).

Introduction: Among older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy, frailty indices predict OS and toxicity. Given the increased use of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), we evaluated frailty and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) among older adults with aNSCLC receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or targeted therapy.

Methods: Patients aged ≥ 65 with aNSCLC starting systemic therapy with non-curative intent underwent geriatric assessments over 6 months. We developed a deficit-accumulation frailty index to categorize patients as robust, pre-frail, or frail. To evaluate associations between frailty and KPS with OS, we used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for race, insurance, and treatment. We used logistic regression to evaluate hospitalizations, functional decline, and severe toxicity.

Results: Among 155 patients (median age 73), 45.8% were robust, 36.1% pre-frail, and 18.2% frail; 34.8% had a KPS ≥ 90, 32.9% had a KPS of 80, and 32.3% had a KPS ≤ 70. The median OS was 17.9 months. Pre-frail/frail patients had worse OS compared to robust patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.09, 95% CI, 1.31-3.34) and were more likely to be hospitalized (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% CI, 1.09-4.48), functionally decline (adjusted OR 2.29, 95% CI, 1.09-4.78), and experience grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity (adjusted OR 5.18, 95% CI, 1.02-26.03). KPS was only associated with OS.

Conclusions: Our frailty index was associated with OS, hospitalization, functional decline, and hematologic AEs among older adults with aNSCLC receiving systemic therapies, while KPS was only associated with OS. Pretreatment frailty assessment may help identify older adults at risk for poor outcomes to optimize decision-making and supportive care.

Background: Early onset Colorectal Cancer (EOCRC), defined as those diagnosed under the age of 50, has been increasing rapidly since 1970. UK data on EOCRC are currently limited and better understanding of the condition is needed.

Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective study of patients with EOCRC treated over 9 years (2013-2021) at a large UK cancer center was performed. Clinicopathological features, risk factors, molecular drivers, treatment, and survival were analyzed.

Results: In total, 203 patients were included. A significant increase in cases was reported from 2018-2019 (n = 33) to 2020-2021 (n = 118). Sporadic EOCRC accounted for 70% of cases and left-sided tumors represented 70.9% (n = 144). Median duration of symptoms was 3 months, while 52.7% of the patients had de-novo metastatic disease. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy was 6 months (95% CI, 4.85-7.15) and median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95% CI, 32.86-43.14). In the advanced setting, left-sided primary tumors were associated with a median OS benefit of 14 months over right-sided primaries (28 vs 14 months, P = .009). Finally, primary tumor resection was associated with median OS benefit of 21 months compared with in situ tumors (38 vs 17 months, P < .001).

Conclusions: The incidence of EOCRC is increasing, and survival outcomes remain modest. Raising public awareness and lowering the age for colorectal cancer screening are directions that could improve EOCRC clinical outcomes. There is also a need for large prospective studies to improve the understanding of the nature of EOCRC and the best therapeutic approaches.