Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-225647
S Vittal Katikireddi, Anna Pearce
{"title":"<i>JECH</i>: Methodological recommendations.","authors":"S Vittal Katikireddi, Anna Pearce","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-225647","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2025-225647","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"67-68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-223864
Eleanor I Williams, Isla Kuhn, Carol E Brayne, Sebastian Walsh
Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a potentially important upstream determinant of late-life cognitive health, but a review which captures the dynamic influence of SES across the life-course is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting associations between life-course SES and dementia/late-life cognitive decline.
Methods: On 21 February 2024, we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, British Education Index, Web of Science, Scopus and Advanced Google for studies related to life-course SES and dementia. We included studies employing trajectory or mediation analysis that measured dementia/cognitive decline as outcomes. Two researchers independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias. Results were synthesised narratively and in Harvest plots.
Results: We included 18 out of 6040 studies screened (n=7 trajectory studies, n=8 mediation studies, n=3 both). Most (13/23) trajectory analyses reported that stable low SES and downward social mobility, relative to stable high SES/upward mobility, were linked to higher dementia and/or cognitive decline risk. Half (5/10) of the mediation analyses reported full mediation of adulthood SES on the association between childhood SES and dementia/cognitive decline, and 4/10 reported partial mediation. Overall, study quality was moderate.
Conclusion: SES has a dynamic life-course association with dementia risk. Increases in dementia risk are compounded by sustained life-course disadvantage. Policies to address socioeconomic disadvantage across the life-course are needed to address this upstream determinant of dementia.
Prospero registration number: CRD42024505975.
背景:社会经济地位(SES)是晚年认知健康的一个潜在重要的上游决定因素,但缺乏对SES在整个生命过程中动态影响的综述。我们对生命过程中SES与痴呆/晚年认知能力下降之间关系的研究进行了系统回顾。方法:我们于2024年2月21日检索Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、British Education Index、Web of Science、Scopus和Advanced谷歌,检索与生命历程SES和痴呆相关的研究。我们纳入了采用轨迹分析或中介分析将痴呆/认知能力下降作为结果的研究。两名研究人员独立筛选文章并评估偏倚风险。结果综合叙述和收获情节。结果:我们纳入了6040项研究中的18项(n=7项轨迹研究,n=8项中介研究,n=3项均为)。大多数(13/23)轨迹分析报告,相对于稳定的高SES/向上流动,稳定的低SES和向下流动的社会地位,与更高的痴呆和/或认知能力下降的风险有关。一半(5/10)的中介分析报告了成年SES对儿童期SES与痴呆/认知能力下降之间关系的完全中介,4/10报告了部分中介。总体而言,研究质量是中等的。结论:SES与痴呆风险存在动态的生命过程关联。持续的生命过程劣势加剧了痴呆症风险的增加。需要制定政策,解决整个生命过程中的社会经济劣势,以解决痴呆症的这一上游决定因素。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024505975。
{"title":"Systematic review of the association between life-course socioeconomic status and late-life cognitive decline.","authors":"Eleanor I Williams, Isla Kuhn, Carol E Brayne, Sebastian Walsh","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-223864","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2025-223864","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic status (SES) is a potentially important upstream determinant of late-life cognitive health, but a review which captures the dynamic influence of SES across the life-course is lacking. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting associations between life-course SES and dementia/late-life cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On 21 February 2024, we searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, British Education Index, Web of Science, Scopus and Advanced Google for studies related to life-course SES and dementia. We included studies employing trajectory or mediation analysis that measured dementia/cognitive decline as outcomes. Two researchers independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias. Results were synthesised narratively and in Harvest plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18 out of 6040 studies screened (n=7 trajectory studies, n=8 mediation studies, n=3 both). Most (13/23) trajectory analyses reported that stable low SES and downward social mobility, relative to stable high SES/upward mobility, were linked to higher dementia and/or cognitive decline risk. Half (5/10) of the mediation analyses reported full mediation of adulthood SES on the association between childhood SES and dementia/cognitive decline, and 4/10 reported partial mediation. Overall, study quality was moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SES has a dynamic life-course association with dementia risk. Increases in dementia risk are compounded by sustained life-course disadvantage. Policies to address socioeconomic disadvantage across the life-course are needed to address this upstream determinant of dementia.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024505975.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"80-88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-224120
Dougie Zubizarreta, Jarvis T Chen, Ariel L Beccia, S Bryn Austin, Zinzi Bailey, Scott Burris, Lindsay Cloud, Madina Agénor
Background: In the USA, HIV remains a pressing public health challenge (~37 400 new diagnoses in 2018) and pronounced racialised inequities persist. In 2018, Black and Latine people represented 43% and 26% of new diagnoses but only 13% and 18% of the population, respectively. Antiracist laws may help mitigate these inequities, yet research investigating specific laws is lacking. This study aimed to examine associations between state minimum wage laws and new HIV diagnosis rates by racialised group and sex/gender.
Methods: We linked data on inflation-adjusted state minimum wage and state-level new HIV diagnosis rates among US adults aged 13-59 years. We fit two-way fixed-effects models to examine associations between changes in minimum wage and changes in new HIV diagnosis rates per 100 000 people from 2010 to 2019 by racialised group (Black/Latine/White) and sex/gender (women/men). Additional analyses tested for effect heterogeneity by racialised group and by sex/gender within racialised group.
Results: Findings show an inverse association between state minimum wage and new HIV diagnosis rates across all racialised and sex/gender groups, except White women. Among Black adults, a 1 US Dollar ($) increase in state minimum wage was associated with a 5.81 per 100 000 decrease in new HIV diagnosis rate, followed by Latine (2.81/100 000) and White adults (1.50/100 000). The inverse association was larger among Latine (4.73/100 000) and White men (2.88/100 000) than Latine (0.98/100 000) and White women (0.07/100 000), respectively. There was no evidence of effect heterogeneity comparing Black men to Black women.
Conclusions: State minimum wage laws may represent a critical policy intervention to address racialised HIV inequities.
{"title":"State minimum wage laws and state-level rates of new HIV diagnoses among Black, Latine, and White US women and men, 2010-2019.","authors":"Dougie Zubizarreta, Jarvis T Chen, Ariel L Beccia, S Bryn Austin, Zinzi Bailey, Scott Burris, Lindsay Cloud, Madina Agénor","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224120","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2025-224120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the USA, HIV remains a pressing public health challenge (~37 400 new diagnoses in 2018) and pronounced racialised inequities persist. In 2018, Black and Latine people represented 43% and 26% of new diagnoses but only 13% and 18% of the population, respectively. Antiracist laws may help mitigate these inequities, yet research investigating specific laws is lacking. This study aimed to examine associations between state minimum wage laws and new HIV diagnosis rates by racialised group and sex/gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked data on inflation-adjusted state minimum wage and state-level new HIV diagnosis rates among US adults aged 13-59 years. We fit two-way fixed-effects models to examine associations between changes in minimum wage and changes in new HIV diagnosis rates per 100 000 people from 2010 to 2019 by racialised group (Black/Latine/White) and sex/gender (women/men). Additional analyses tested for effect heterogeneity by racialised group and by sex/gender within racialised group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings show an inverse association between state minimum wage and new HIV diagnosis rates across all racialised and sex/gender groups, except White women. Among Black adults, a 1 US Dollar ($) increase in state minimum wage was associated with a 5.81 per 100 000 decrease in new HIV diagnosis rate, followed by Latine (2.81/100 000) and White adults (1.50/100 000). The inverse association was larger among Latine (4.73/100 000) and White men (2.88/100 000) than Latine (0.98/100 000) and White women (0.07/100 000), respectively. There was no evidence of effect heterogeneity comparing Black men to Black women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State minimum wage laws may represent a critical policy intervention to address racialised HIV inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12723711/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145369320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-224561
Pablo Kuri-Morales, Rocio Ortiz-Lopez, Elena-Cristina Gonzalez-Castillo, Nestor Rubio-Infante, Jose Ramírez-Vega, Rocio-Alejandra Chavez-Santoscoy, Cuitláhuac Ruiz-Matus, Martin De-La-Cruz, Israel Aguilar-Ordoñez, Gerardo Garcia-Rivas, Servando Cardona, Miguel Betancourt-Cravioto, Victor Trevino, Guillermo Torre-Amione
Background: Genomic information is transforming public health and personalised medicine by identifying genetic and environmental contributors to disease. However, Hispanic populations remain under-represented in global genomic datasets, limiting the relevance of findings for groups such as the Mexican population. The oriGen project, launched by Tecnológico de Monterrey, aims to address this disparity by establishing a nationally representative cohort of 100 000 Mexican adults. The project integrates clinical, lifestyle and genomic data to enable the study of gene-environment interactions, disease susceptibility and health disparities in Mexico and Latin America.
Methods: oriGen is a prospective, population-based biobank recruiting participants from 18 metropolitan areas across 19 Mexican states using probabilistic, stratified, multistage sampling based on national statistical frameworks. Data collection includes electronic questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, vital signs and biological samples for biochemical analysis and genomic sequencing. Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing are conducted in collaboration with national and international partners.
Results: As of April 2025, 83 764 individuals (61% female) have been enrolled. The cohort slightly over-represents older adults and women. Baseline data show a high prevalence of obesity (40%), elevated blood pressure (mean 127.4/81.7 mm Hg) and elevated blood glucose (mean 133.3 mg/dL). Initial genomic analyses (n=1318) indicate an average admixture of 61.8% Native American, 32.4% European and 5.1% African ancestry, with regional variation.
Conclusion: oriGen represents one of the most comprehensive genomic epidemiology efforts in Mexico, offering a valuable resource for advancing equitable precision medicine and public health research in under-represented populations.
背景:基因组信息通过识别疾病的遗传和环境因素,正在改变公共卫生和个性化医疗。然而,西班牙裔人口在全球基因组数据集中的代表性仍然不足,这限制了研究结果与墨西哥人口等群体的相关性。由Tecnológico de Monterrey发起的oriGen项目旨在通过建立一个由10万墨西哥成年人组成的全国代表性队列来解决这一差距。该项目综合了临床、生活方式和基因组数据,以便研究墨西哥和拉丁美洲的基因-环境相互作用、疾病易感性和健康差异。方法:oriGen是一个前瞻性的、基于人群的生物库,采用基于国家统计框架的概率、分层、多阶段抽样,从墨西哥19个州的18个大都市招募参与者。数据收集包括电子问卷、人体测量、生命体征和生化分析和基因组测序的生物样本。全基因组和全外显子组测序是与国家和国际伙伴合作进行的。结果:截至2025年4月,共入组83764人(61%为女性)。该队列中老年人和女性的比例略高。基线数据显示肥胖患病率高(40%),血压升高(平均127.4/81.7 mm Hg)和血糖升高(平均133.3 mg/dL)。最初的基因组分析(n=1318)表明,平均61.8%的美洲原住民、32.4%的欧洲人和5.1%的非洲人祖先混合在一起,存在区域差异。结论:oriGen代表了墨西哥最全面的基因组流行病学工作之一,为在代表性不足的人群中推进公平的精准医学和公共卫生研究提供了宝贵的资源。
{"title":"oriGen cohort: a Mexican population-based epidemiological and genomic research platform.","authors":"Pablo Kuri-Morales, Rocio Ortiz-Lopez, Elena-Cristina Gonzalez-Castillo, Nestor Rubio-Infante, Jose Ramírez-Vega, Rocio-Alejandra Chavez-Santoscoy, Cuitláhuac Ruiz-Matus, Martin De-La-Cruz, Israel Aguilar-Ordoñez, Gerardo Garcia-Rivas, Servando Cardona, Miguel Betancourt-Cravioto, Victor Trevino, Guillermo Torre-Amione","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224561","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2025-224561","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomic information is transforming public health and personalised medicine by identifying genetic and environmental contributors to disease. However, Hispanic populations remain under-represented in global genomic datasets, limiting the relevance of findings for groups such as the Mexican population. The oriGen project, launched by Tecnológico de Monterrey, aims to address this disparity by establishing a nationally representative cohort of 100 000 Mexican adults. The project integrates clinical, lifestyle and genomic data to enable the study of gene-environment interactions, disease susceptibility and health disparities in Mexico and Latin America.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>oriGen is a prospective, population-based biobank recruiting participants from 18 metropolitan areas across 19 Mexican states using probabilistic, stratified, multistage sampling based on national statistical frameworks. Data collection includes electronic questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, vital signs and biological samples for biochemical analysis and genomic sequencing. Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing are conducted in collaboration with national and international partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of April 2025, 83 764 individuals (61% female) have been enrolled. The cohort slightly over-represents older adults and women. Baseline data show a high prevalence of obesity (40%), elevated blood pressure (mean 127.4/81.7 mm Hg) and elevated blood glucose (mean 133.3 mg/dL). Initial genomic analyses (n=1318) indicate an average admixture of 61.8% Native American, 32.4% European and 5.1% African ancestry, with regional variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>oriGen represents one of the most comprehensive genomic epidemiology efforts in Mexico, offering a valuable resource for advancing equitable precision medicine and public health research in under-represented populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"97-104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145369352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-224513
Christine Camacho, Peter Bower, Roger T Webb, Luke Munford
Background: Community resilience is a relevant concept in public health, but its empirical relationship with health outcomes remains underexplored. This study examines whether a Community Resilience Index (CRI) is associated with population health outcomes in England, and whether it offers explanatory added value beyond the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).
Methods: The CRI comprises 44 indicators reflecting community-level resilience to chronic stressors. Associations between CRI scores and five health outcomes, deaths of despair, cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, COVID-19 mortality, excess all-cause mortality during two waves of COVID-19 and self-rated health were assessed at local authority district level. IMD was adjusted to remove health-related indicators. Linear regression models assessed the explanatory power of the CRI and IMD, using likelihood ratio tests to compare model fit. Interaction and stratified analyses explored effect modification by IMD.
Results: Higher CRI scores were associated with lower Deaths of Despair and CVD mortality, and higher self-rated health; these associations remained significant after adjusting for IMD. CRI was not significantly associated with COVID-19 outcomes. IMD remained the stronger predictor of health outcomes, but CRI significantly improved model fit. The interaction between CRI and IMD was significant for deaths of despair and self-rated health. Stratified analyses showed the CRI-deaths of despair association was strongest in more deprived areas.
Conclusions: Community resilience is associated with health outcomes in England. While not a substitute for deprivation-based measures, resilience indices offer complementary insight into structural and social factors shaping health. Resilience-building efforts may be particularly impactful in areas of greatest disadvantage.
{"title":"Assessing the relationship between community resilience and health outcomes: an observational local-authority level study in England.","authors":"Christine Camacho, Peter Bower, Roger T Webb, Luke Munford","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224513","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2025-224513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community resilience is a relevant concept in public health, but its empirical relationship with health outcomes remains underexplored. This study examines whether a Community Resilience Index (CRI) is associated with population health outcomes in England, and whether it offers explanatory added value beyond the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CRI comprises 44 indicators reflecting community-level resilience to chronic stressors. Associations between CRI scores and five health outcomes, deaths of despair, cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, COVID-19 mortality, excess all-cause mortality during two waves of COVID-19 and self-rated health were assessed at local authority district level. IMD was adjusted to remove health-related indicators. Linear regression models assessed the explanatory power of the CRI and IMD, using likelihood ratio tests to compare model fit. Interaction and stratified analyses explored effect modification by IMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher CRI scores were associated with lower Deaths of Despair and CVD mortality, and higher self-rated health; these associations remained significant after adjusting for IMD. CRI was not significantly associated with COVID-19 outcomes. IMD remained the stronger predictor of health outcomes, but CRI significantly improved model fit. The interaction between CRI and IMD was significant for deaths of despair and self-rated health. Stratified analyses showed the CRI-deaths of despair association was strongest in more deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community resilience is associated with health outcomes in England. While not a substitute for deprivation-based measures, resilience indices offer complementary insight into structural and social factors shaping health. Resilience-building efforts may be particularly impactful in areas of greatest disadvantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145472395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-224627
Amalie Lykkemark Møller, Kathrine Kold Sørensen, Nerissa Nance, Julie Thietje Mortensen, Thomas Alexander Gerds, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Helene Charlotte Wiese Rytgaard
Disadvantaged groups are often defined by characteristics such as income or ethnicity. Reducing health disparities by directly manipulating such exposures may be infeasible. Instead, interventions can target mediators between these exposures and health outcomes. Indirect effects estimated using mediation analysis, interventional effects or the interventional disparity measure can quantify the expected impact of such disparity-reducing interventions. They capture the impact of changing the mediator distribution evaluated among the total population. This means keeping individuals in their exposure group but hypothetically assigning them the mediator distribution of another group. However, when indirect effects are intended to inform about disparity-reducing interventions implemented among disadvantaged groups, estimating effects in the total population does not quantify the effect among those targeted. Instead, we propose evaluating the interventional disparity indirect effect directly among the disadvantaged individuals. We introduce the estimand and illustrate it using a register-based study examining a potential intervention improving medication initiation in low-income heart failure patients. We compare the expected change in 1-year mortality in a hypothetical world where low-income patients were as likely to initiate medication as high-income patients. We included 1700 patients and assessed intervention effects in low-income patients and the total population, respectively. Under the intervention, the 1-year mortality declined from 10.3% to 9.3% (95% CI 8.6% to 10.1%) among low-income patients but 6.6% to 6.2% (95% CI 6.0% to 6.5%) in the total population. In disparity research, evaluating intervention effects in the total population, rather than among disadvantaged groups, may impact the effect size. Therefore, when guiding future disparity-targeted interventions, measuring effects within disadvantaged groups is important.
弱势群体通常以收入或种族等特征来定义。通过直接操纵这种接触来减少健康差距可能是不可行的。相反,干预措施可以针对这些暴露与健康结果之间的中介。使用中介分析、干预效应或干预差异测量估算的间接效应可以量化此类减少差异的干预措施的预期影响。它们捕获了在总人口中评估的中介分布变化的影响。这意味着将个体保持在他们的暴露组中,但假设将他们分配到另一个组的中介分布中。然而,当间接效果旨在了解在弱势群体中实施的减少差距的干预措施时,估计对总人口的影响并不能量化对目标人群的影响。相反,我们建议直接评估干预差异对弱势个体的间接影响。我们介绍了这一估计,并使用一项基于登记册的研究来说明它,该研究检查了改善低收入心力衰竭患者药物启动的潜在干预措施。我们比较了假设低收入患者与高收入患者一样可能开始服药的情况下1年死亡率的预期变化。我们纳入了1700名患者,并分别评估了低收入患者和总人口的干预效果。在干预下,低收入患者的1年死亡率从10.3%降至9.3% (95% CI 8.6%至10.1%),而总人口的1年死亡率从6.6%降至6.2% (95% CI 6.0%至6.5%)。在差异研究中,评估总体人群的干预效果,而不是弱势群体的干预效果,可能会影响效果大小。因此,在指导未来针对差异的干预措施时,衡量弱势群体的效果非常重要。
{"title":"Estimating effects of targeted public health interventions using the interventional disparity indirect effect among the exposed.","authors":"Amalie Lykkemark Møller, Kathrine Kold Sørensen, Nerissa Nance, Julie Thietje Mortensen, Thomas Alexander Gerds, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Helene Charlotte Wiese Rytgaard","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-224627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disadvantaged groups are often defined by characteristics such as income or ethnicity. Reducing health disparities by directly manipulating such exposures may be infeasible. Instead, interventions can target mediators between these exposures and health outcomes. Indirect effects estimated using mediation analysis, interventional effects or the interventional disparity measure can quantify the expected impact of such disparity-reducing interventions. They capture the impact of changing the mediator distribution evaluated among the total population. This means keeping individuals in their exposure group but hypothetically assigning them the mediator distribution of another group. However, when indirect effects are intended to inform about disparity-reducing interventions implemented among disadvantaged groups, estimating effects in the total population does not quantify the effect among those targeted. Instead, we propose evaluating the interventional disparity indirect effect directly among the disadvantaged individuals. We introduce the estimand and illustrate it using a register-based study examining a potential intervention improving medication initiation in low-income heart failure patients. We compare the expected change in 1-year mortality in a hypothetical world where low-income patients were as likely to initiate medication as high-income patients. We included 1700 patients and assessed intervention effects in low-income patients and the total population, respectively. Under the intervention, the 1-year mortality declined from 10.3% to 9.3% (95% CI 8.6% to 10.1%) among low-income patients but 6.6% to 6.2% (95% CI 6.0% to 6.5%) in the total population. In disparity research, evaluating intervention effects in the total population, rather than among disadvantaged groups, may impact the effect size. Therefore, when guiding future disparity-targeted interventions, measuring effects within disadvantaged groups is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145936532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-224851
Mohammad Hajizadeh, Emran Hasan
Background: While C-section (CS) deliveries exhibit significant socioeconomic inequalities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the extent and underlying drivers of these inequalities remain poorly understood. This study assesses these inequalities and identifies key contributing factors.
Methods: The most recent nationally representative samples of live births (n=652 539) from the Demographic and Health Surveys, conducted between 2014 and 2024 in 44 LMICs, were used to calculate the CS delivery rates. The Wagstaff (WI) and Erreygers (EI) indices were used to measure the relative and absolute socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify the proximate determinants of the observed socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery across the selected LMICs.
Results: CS delivery rates varied across LMICs, with a median of 6.25% (IQR=16.18). The WI and EI indicated that CS deliveries were concentrated among high socioeconomic backgrounds, with only one country exhibiting no inequality. The pooled estimates (WI: 0.32, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.36 and EI: 0.11, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.14) further demonstrate the concentration of CS among the rich in LMICs. Meta-regression analyses indicated that inequalities in education and antenatal care were significantly and positively associated with the concentration of CS deliveries among wealthier women.
Conclusion: CS delivery concentration among wealthier women remains a health concern in LMICs. Given the positive link between higher education and antenatal care with CS deliveries, country-specific policies promoting health education and targeted messaging during antenatal care visits on the adverse health effects of unnecessary CS deliveries may help reduce socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery.
背景:虽然在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)剖腹产分娩表现出显著的社会经济不平等,但人们对这些不平等的程度和潜在驱动因素仍知之甚少。这项研究评估了这些不平等,并确定了关键的促成因素。方法:采用2014年至2024年在44个低收入和中等收入国家进行的人口与健康调查中最新的全国代表性活产样本(n= 655239)来计算CS分娩率。使用Wagstaff (WI)和Erreygers (EI)指数来衡量CS交付中的相对和绝对社会经济不平等。进行meta回归分析,以确定在选定的中低收入国家中观察到的CS交付中社会经济不平等的近似决定因素。结果:CS递送率在中低收入国家之间存在差异,中位数为6.25% (IQR=16.18)。WI和EI表明,CS交付集中在高社会经济背景的国家,只有一个国家没有表现出不平等。汇总估计(WI: 0.32, 95% CI 0.28至0.36,EI: 0.11, 95% CI 0.09至0.14)进一步表明,CS在低收入中低收入人群中的浓度较高。荟萃回归分析表明,教育和产前保健方面的不平等与富裕妇女中CS分娩的集中显著正相关。结论:富裕妇女CS分娩集中仍然是中低收入国家的一个健康问题。鉴于高等教育和产前保健与保健分娩之间的积极联系,在产前保健访问期间促进健康教育和有针对性地宣传不必要的保健分娩对健康的不利影响的国别政策可能有助于减少保健分娩中的社会经济不平等。
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequalities in C-section deliveries in low- and middle-income countries: measurement and determinants.","authors":"Mohammad Hajizadeh, Emran Hasan","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224851","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-224851","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While C-section (CS) deliveries exhibit significant socioeconomic inequalities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the extent and underlying drivers of these inequalities remain poorly understood. This study assesses these inequalities and identifies key contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The most recent nationally representative samples of live births (n=652 539) from the Demographic and Health Surveys, conducted between 2014 and 2024 in 44 LMICs, were used to calculate the CS delivery rates. The Wagstaff (WI) and Erreygers (EI) indices were used to measure the relative and absolute socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify the proximate determinants of the observed socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery across the selected LMICs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS delivery rates varied across LMICs, with a median of 6.25% (IQR=16.18). The WI and EI indicated that CS deliveries were concentrated among high socioeconomic backgrounds, with only one country exhibiting no inequality. The pooled estimates (WI: 0.32, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.36 and EI: 0.11, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.14) further demonstrate the concentration of CS among the rich in LMICs. Meta-regression analyses indicated that inequalities in education and antenatal care were significantly and positively associated with the concentration of CS deliveries among wealthier women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS delivery concentration among wealthier women remains a health concern in LMICs. Given the positive link between higher education and antenatal care with CS deliveries, country-specific policies promoting health education and targeted messaging during antenatal care visits on the adverse health effects of unnecessary CS deliveries may help reduce socioeconomic inequalities in CS delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-224802
Kritika Rana, Sandro Sperandei, Sithum Munasinghe, Jennifer L Kent, Andrew Page
Background: Housing is a critical social determinant of health for migrant and refugee populations in high-income countries; however, the causal pathways linking housing affordability to health outcomes remain underexplored. This study aimed to examine the relationship between housing affordability stress and both mental and general health, and to assess the role of economic deprivation as a mediator of this relationship.
Methods: This study uses data from the five waves (2013-2018) of the Building a New Life in Australia study, which followed 2399 humanitarian migrants who arrived in Australia or were granted a permanent protection visa in 2013. Causal mediation analyses using marginal structural models were conducted to decompose the total effect of housing affordability stress on mental and general health into the natural direct effect and natural indirect effect mediated through economic deprivation.
Results: The total effect of housing affordability stress on mental health was 1.56 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.92). Economic deprivation mediated 37% (95% CI 19.5% to 68.8%) of the total effect, and 79.6% (95% CI 60.3% to 113.9%) of the total effect could potentially be eliminated by intervening on economic deprivation. For self-rated general health, the total effect of housing affordability stress was 1.43 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.74). Economic deprivation accounted for 27.7% (95% CI 5.3% to 62.6%) of the total effect, and 65.9% (95% CI 29.9% to 101.9%) of the total effect could potentially be eliminated by intervening on economic deprivation.
Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that housing affordability stress leads to elevated psychological distress and poor self-rated general health among humanitarian migrants. A substantial portion of this impact occurs through economic deprivation, which could be attenuated by targeting economic deprivation as a key intervention point during early years of resettlement.
背景:住房是高收入国家移民和难民人口健康的关键社会决定因素;然而,住房负担能力与健康结果之间的因果关系仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在检验住房负担能力压力与心理和一般健康之间的关系,并评估经济剥夺在这种关系中的中介作用。方法:本研究使用了“在澳大利亚建立新生活”研究的五波(2013-2018)数据,该研究追踪了2013年抵达澳大利亚或获得永久保护签证的2399名人道主义移民。利用边际结构模型进行因果中介分析,将住房负担能力压力对心理健康和一般健康的总影响分解为经济剥夺介导的自然直接效应和自然间接效应。结果:住房负担压力对心理健康的总影响为1.56 (95% CI 1.26 ~ 1.92)。经济剥夺介导了总效应的37% (95% CI 19.5%至68.8%),而79.6% (95% CI 60.3%至113.9%)的总效应可能通过干预经济剥夺而消除。对于自评一般健康,住房负担能力压力的总影响为1.43 (95% CI 1.15至1.74)。经济剥夺占总效应的27.7% (95% CI 5.3%至62.6%),65.9% (95% CI 29.9%至101.9%)的总效应可能通过干预经济剥夺而消除。结论:研究结果表明,住房负担能力压力导致人道主义移民的心理困扰加剧,总体健康状况自评较差。这种影响的很大一部分是由于经济剥夺造成的,如果在重新安置的最初几年将经济剥夺作为一个关键的干预点,就可以减轻这种影响。
{"title":"Economic deprivation as a mediator in the relationship between housing affordability stress and mental and general health among humanitarian migrants in Australia.","authors":"Kritika Rana, Sandro Sperandei, Sithum Munasinghe, Jennifer L Kent, Andrew Page","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224802","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-224802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Housing is a critical social determinant of health for migrant and refugee populations in high-income countries; however, the causal pathways linking housing affordability to health outcomes remain underexplored. This study aimed to examine the relationship between housing affordability stress and both mental and general health, and to assess the role of economic deprivation as a mediator of this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses data from the five waves (2013-2018) of the Building a New Life in Australia study, which followed 2399 humanitarian migrants who arrived in Australia or were granted a permanent protection visa in 2013. Causal mediation analyses using marginal structural models were conducted to decompose the total effect of housing affordability stress on mental and general health into the natural direct effect and natural indirect effect mediated through economic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total effect of housing affordability stress on mental health was 1.56 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.92). Economic deprivation mediated 37% (95% CI 19.5% to 68.8%) of the total effect, and 79.6% (95% CI 60.3% to 113.9%) of the total effect could potentially be eliminated by intervening on economic deprivation. For self-rated general health, the total effect of housing affordability stress was 1.43 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.74). Economic deprivation accounted for 27.7% (95% CI 5.3% to 62.6%) of the total effect, and 65.9% (95% CI 29.9% to 101.9%) of the total effect could potentially be eliminated by intervening on economic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings demonstrate that housing affordability stress leads to elevated psychological distress and poor self-rated general health among humanitarian migrants. A substantial portion of this impact occurs through economic deprivation, which could be attenuated by targeting economic deprivation as a key intervention point during early years of resettlement.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1136/jech-2025-225229
Zongbin Wang, Yan Zhang, Long Zhang, Siwei Xie, Sidney Smith, Zhi-Jie Zheng, Dingcheng Xiang, Yinzi Jin, Yong Huo, Shuduo Zhou
Background: Prehospital delays remain critical barriers to timely acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care, particularly for patients referred from resource-constrained primary healthcare to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capabilities. This study evaluated the associations between China Chest Pain Unit (CPU) programme, with prehospital delays, management and in-hospital outcomes for ACS patients.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used registry data from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Database. We included patients diagnosed with ACS who were referred from primary healthcare facilities to chest pain centres (CPCs). The CPU-referral group received standardised triage and referral protocols; the non-CPU-referral group received routine referral. All patients were treated at CPCs. Primary outcomes included in-hospital heart failure, in-hospital mortality, door-in-door-out (DIDO) time and time from onset to CPC door. Secondary outcomes included time from onset to first medical contact, door-to-balloon time, discharge medication use, length of stay and total hospital expenditure. Propensity score matching and generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate the associations.
Results: A cohort consisting of 8834 patients was constructed by propensity score matching among 119 723 eligible referred ACS patients (5000 CPU-referrals and 114 723 non-CPU-referrals). CPU referral was associated with lower odds of in-hospital heart failure (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.30) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92), shorter DIDO time (β=-0.33, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.25) and shorter times from onset to arrival at the CPC door (β=-0.19, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.11). CPU referral was also associated with shorter time to first medical contact and door-to-balloon time, improved adherence to guideline-recommended discharge medications, reduced length of stay and lower total hospital expenditure.
Conclusions: The regionalised quality improvement programme for CPUs was associated with reduced prehospital delays, lower in-hospital heart failure and mortality, better care quality and lower costs among referred ACS patients.
院前延误仍然是及时治疗急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的关键障碍,特别是对于从资源有限的初级医疗机构转到具有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)能力的医院的患者。本研究评估了中国胸痛科(CPU)方案与ACS患者院前延误、管理和院内结局之间的关系。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用来自中国心血管协会数据库的注册数据。我们纳入了从初级卫生保健机构转介到胸痛中心(cpc)诊断为ACS的患者。cpu转诊组接受标准化的分诊和转诊方案;非cpu转介组接受常规转介。所有患者均在cpc接受治疗。主要结局包括院内心力衰竭、院内死亡率、室内外(DIDO)时间和从发病到CPC门的时间。次要结局包括从发病到第一次医疗接触的时间、门到球囊的时间、出院药物使用、住院时间和医院总支出。使用倾向评分匹配和广义线性混合模型来评估相关性。结果:通过倾向评分匹配,在119 723名符合条件的ACS患者(5000名cpu转诊患者和114 723名非cpu转诊患者)中构建了8834名患者。CPU转诊与院内心力衰竭(OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08至0.30)和院内死亡率(OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50至0.92)、较短的DIDO时间(β=-0.33, 95% CI -0.40至-0.25)和较短的从发病到到达CPC门口的时间(β=-0.19, 95% CI -0.27至-0.11)相关。CPU转诊还与缩短首次医疗接触时间和上门到球囊时间、提高对指南推荐的出院药物的依从性、缩短住院时间和降低医院总支出有关。结论:在转诊的ACS患者中,区域化的cpu质量改进方案与减少院前延误、降低院内心力衰竭和死亡率、提高护理质量和降低费用相关。
{"title":"Scalable regionalised quality improvement model for ACS management in resource-limited primary healthcare facilities.","authors":"Zongbin Wang, Yan Zhang, Long Zhang, Siwei Xie, Sidney Smith, Zhi-Jie Zheng, Dingcheng Xiang, Yinzi Jin, Yong Huo, Shuduo Zhou","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-225229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-225229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital delays remain critical barriers to timely acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care, particularly for patients referred from resource-constrained primary healthcare to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capabilities. This study evaluated the associations between China Chest Pain Unit (CPU) programme, with prehospital delays, management and in-hospital outcomes for ACS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used registry data from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Database. We included patients diagnosed with ACS who were referred from primary healthcare facilities to chest pain centres (CPCs). The CPU-referral group received standardised triage and referral protocols; the non-CPU-referral group received routine referral. All patients were treated at CPCs. Primary outcomes included in-hospital heart failure, in-hospital mortality, door-in-door-out (DIDO) time and time from onset to CPC door. Secondary outcomes included time from onset to first medical contact, door-to-balloon time, discharge medication use, length of stay and total hospital expenditure. Propensity score matching and generalised linear mixed models were used to evaluate the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort consisting of 8834 patients was constructed by propensity score matching among 119 723 eligible referred ACS patients (5000 CPU-referrals and 114 723 non-CPU-referrals). CPU referral was associated with lower odds of in-hospital heart failure (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.30) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92), shorter DIDO time (β=-0.33, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.25) and shorter times from onset to arrival at the CPC door (β=-0.19, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.11). CPU referral was also associated with shorter time to first medical contact and door-to-balloon time, improved adherence to guideline-recommended discharge medications, reduced length of stay and lower total hospital expenditure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The regionalised quality improvement programme for CPUs was associated with reduced prehospital delays, lower in-hospital heart failure and mortality, better care quality and lower costs among referred ACS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death among young adults in South Korea. We investigated the association between triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and suicide mortality in young adults.
Methods: This nationwide study analysed data from 6 667 138 individuals aged 20-39 using the National Health Insurance Database. Participants were grouped into TyG index quartiles. The primary outcome was suicide mortality.
Results: During a median follow-up duration of 10.7 years, 41 004 (0.6%) suicidal deaths occurred. The cumulative event rates for suicide mortality were highest among participants in TyG index quartile 4. Multivariable Cox analysis showed significant increases in the risks of suicide mortality in participants with TyG index quartile 4 compared with those in the low quartiles (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.23, vs quartile 1; adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.20, vs quartile 1-3). The association between the TyG index and the risks of suicide mortality was positive and quasi-linear. Subgroup analysis showed a consistent trend of increasing HRs for suicide mortality with higher TyG index quartiles, with significant interactions between TyG index, sex and depression.
Conclusion: TyG index can be useful in identifying young individuals at an increased risk of suicide mortality.
背景:自杀是韩国年轻人死亡的主要原因。我们调查了甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数与年轻人自杀死亡率之间的关系。方法:这项全国性研究使用国家健康保险数据库分析了6 667 138名年龄在20-39岁之间的人的数据。参与者被分为TyG指数四分位数。主要结局为自杀死亡率。结果:在10.7年的中位随访期间,发生了410004例(0.6%)自杀死亡。自杀死亡率的累积事件率在TyG指数四分位数4的参与者中最高。多变量Cox分析显示,TyG指数四分位数4的参与者的自杀死亡率风险显著高于低四分位数的参与者(调整后的风险比1.17,95% CI 1.11至1.23,与四分位数1相比;调整后的风险比1.15,95% CI 1.10至1.20,与四分位数1-3相比)。TyG指数与自杀死亡风险呈拟线性正相关。亚组分析显示,TyG指数四分位数越高,自杀死亡率呈上升趋势,且TyG指数、性别和抑郁之间存在显著交互作用。结论:TyG指数可用于识别自杀死亡风险增加的年轻人。
{"title":"Triglyceride-glucose index and risks of suicide mortality in young adults: a nationwide population-based study.","authors":"Yu Ho Lee, Kyungdo Han, Hye Eun Yoon, Sungjin Chung, Hyeon Seok Hwang","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-224962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-224962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide is a leading cause of death among young adults in South Korea. We investigated the association between triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and suicide mortality in young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide study analysed data from 6 667 138 individuals aged 20-39 using the National Health Insurance Database. Participants were grouped into TyG index quartiles. The primary outcome was suicide mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up duration of 10.7 years, 41 004 (0.6%) suicidal deaths occurred. The cumulative event rates for suicide mortality were highest among participants in TyG index quartile 4. Multivariable Cox analysis showed significant increases in the risks of suicide mortality in participants with TyG index quartile 4 compared with those in the low quartiles (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.23, vs quartile 1; adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.20, vs quartile 1-3). The association between the TyG index and the risks of suicide mortality was positive and quasi-linear. Subgroup analysis showed a consistent trend of increasing HRs for suicide mortality with higher TyG index quartiles, with significant interactions between TyG index, sex and depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TyG index can be useful in identifying young individuals at an increased risk of suicide mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}