Pub Date : 2025-02-10DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222467
Jo Lin Chew, Brendan T Smith, Sarah A Buchan, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan, Roman Pabayo
Background: Influenza vaccines are crucial in reducing the risk of influenza symptoms. We aimed to: (1) estimate the association between public health unit (PHU) funding per capita and influenza vaccination among individuals aged 12 and older in Ontario in 2013/2014 and 2018/2019 and (2) determine whether any observed associations were heterogeneous across household income groups, gender and age categories.
Methods: Cross-sectional studies were conducted using the Canadian Community Health Survey, a population-representative survey that collects annual health data. PHU funding per capita was measured using the approved provincial funding for mandatory programmes and the Canadian Census Population Estimates. Self-reported influenza vaccination status in the past year was used. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate the association.
Results: A case-complete weighted dataset revealed that 33.2% in 2013/2014 and 35.1% in 2018/2019 of respondents were vaccinated. In 2013/2014, every standard deviation (SD) increase in PHU funding per capita was associated with vaccination (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.15; SD: 14.1). Furthermore, for every SD increase in PHU funding per capita in 2013/2014, individuals from the lowest household income and between the ages of 50 and 64 years were 29% (95% CI: 1.10, 1.50) and 13% (95% CI: 1.03, 1.23) more likely to be vaccinated, respectively, while adjusting for confounders. No heterogeneous associations were observed in 2018/2019.
Conclusion: Funding may have the potential to support PHU's role in preventing diseases, promoting health and reducing health inequities among the population.
{"title":"Public health unit funding per capita and seasonal influenza vaccination among youth and adults in Ontario, Canada in 2013/2014 and 2018/2019.","authors":"Jo Lin Chew, Brendan T Smith, Sarah A Buchan, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan, Roman Pabayo","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222467","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2024-222467","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza vaccines are crucial in reducing the risk of influenza symptoms. We aimed to: (1) estimate the association between public health unit (PHU) funding per capita and influenza vaccination among individuals aged 12 and older in Ontario in 2013/2014 and 2018/2019 and (2) determine whether any observed associations were heterogeneous across household income groups, gender and age categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional studies were conducted using the Canadian Community Health Survey, a population-representative survey that collects annual health data. PHU funding per capita was measured using the approved provincial funding for mandatory programmes and the Canadian Census Population Estimates. Self-reported influenza vaccination status in the past year was used. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A case-complete weighted dataset revealed that 33.2% in 2013/2014 and 35.1% in 2018/2019 of respondents were vaccinated. In 2013/2014, every standard deviation (SD) increase in PHU funding per capita was associated with vaccination (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.15; SD: 14.1). Furthermore, for every SD increase in PHU funding per capita in 2013/2014, individuals from the lowest household income and between the ages of 50 and 64 years were 29% (95% CI: 1.10, 1.50) and 13% (95% CI: 1.03, 1.23) more likely to be vaccinated, respectively, while adjusting for confounders. No heterogeneous associations were observed in 2018/2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Funding may have the potential to support PHU's role in preventing diseases, promoting health and reducing health inequities among the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"176-186"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142481297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-10DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-221677
André Oliveira Werneck, Raphael Henrique de Oliveira Araujo, Danilo Rodrigues Silva, Brendon Stubbs
Background: Our aim was to analyse the prospective association between psychological distress during early adulthood and physical activity trajectories between early and middle adulthood.
Methods: We used data from the 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS) (n=8994, 4388 women) and the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS) (n=7014, 4388 women). Psychological distress was assessed using the Malaise inventory at 23 years in the 1958 NCDS and at 26 years at the 1970 BCS. Self-report leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) was assessed at 33 years, 42 years, 46 years, 50 years and 55 years in the 1958 NCDS as well as at 30 years, 34 years, 42 years and 46 years in the 1970 BCS. We created physical activity trajectories, using latent class growth analysis. Poisson regression analysis was used for association.
Results: We identified three trajectories of physical activity during adulthood in both cohorts. Participants with psychological distress at 23 years were less likely to be in the persistently high trajectory (RRadjusted: 0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) in the 1958 NCDS. In addition, participants with psychological distress at 26 years were less likely to be in the increased LTPA (0.73; 0.59 to 0.89) and persistently high (0.59; 0.50 to 0.69) trajectories, comparing with participants without psychological distress.
Conclusion: Elevated psychological distress during early adulthood is associated with a lower probability of adopting positive trajectories of LTPA during adulthood.
{"title":"Is there an association between psychological distress during early adulthood and later trajectories of physical activity during adulthood? Longitudinal data from two cohort studies.","authors":"André Oliveira Werneck, Raphael Henrique de Oliveira Araujo, Danilo Rodrigues Silva, Brendon Stubbs","doi":"10.1136/jech-2023-221677","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2023-221677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our aim was to analyse the prospective association between psychological distress during early adulthood and physical activity trajectories between early and middle adulthood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the 1958 National Child Development Study (NCDS) (n=8994, 4388 women) and the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS) (n=7014, 4388 women). Psychological distress was assessed using the Malaise inventory at 23 years in the 1958 NCDS and at 26 years at the 1970 BCS. Self-report leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) was assessed at 33 years, 42 years, 46 years, 50 years and 55 years in the 1958 NCDS as well as at 30 years, 34 years, 42 years and 46 years in the 1970 BCS. We created physical activity trajectories, using latent class growth analysis. Poisson regression analysis was used for association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three trajectories of physical activity during adulthood in both cohorts. Participants with psychological distress at 23 years were less likely to be in the persistently high trajectory (RR<sub>adjusted</sub>: 0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98) in the 1958 NCDS. In addition, participants with psychological distress at 26 years were less likely to be in the increased LTPA (0.73; 0.59 to 0.89) and persistently high (0.59; 0.50 to 0.69) trajectories, comparing with participants without psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated psychological distress during early adulthood is associated with a lower probability of adopting positive trajectories of LTPA during adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142481295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions on human activities have greatly changed lifestyles, which might have deteriorated the cardiometabolic profile.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of cardiometabolic risk factors among Japanese workers in fiscal years (FY) 2020 and 2021 compared with the prepandemic period.
Method: This study comprised an average of 71 025 employees in Japan who underwent annual health check-ups for at least two successive years from 2015 to 2021. Annual incidence rates from 2016 to 2021 were assessed for obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and metabolic syndrome (MetS). The observed incidence rates in 2020 and 2021 were compared with the predicted incidence based on prepandemic trends (2016 to 2019).
Results: Relative to the prepandemic, the incidence of all the outcomes, except for dyslipidaemia, significantly increased in 2020. Between FY 2016 and 2019, the adjusted mean incidence of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and MetS was 5.0%, 1.4%, 5.3%, 17.4% and 7.6%, respectively. In FY 2020, the adjusted incidence (95% CI) of these outcomes increased to 6.02 (5.80 to 6.24), 1.84 (1.73 to 1.96), 6.62 (6.40 to 6.83), 19.31 (18.83 to 19.78) and 8.51 (8.23 to 8.78), which were higher than the predicted incidence of 5.24 (4.99 to 5.49), 1.54 (1.41 to 1.67), 6.02 (5.76 to 6.27), 18.58 (18.00 to 19.16) and 8.05 (7.71 to 8.38) for 2020, respectively. The incidence returned to the prepandemic levels in FY 2021.
Conclusion: Results showed a worsening of the cardiometabolic profile during the initial year of the pandemic, which was reverted in the second year to the levels before the pandemic.
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of cardiometabolic risk factors among workers: results from the Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health study.","authors":"Zobida Islam, Shohei Yamamoto, Yosuke Inoue, Toru Honda, Shuichiro Yamamoto, Tohru Nakagawa, Hiroko Okazaki, Hiroshi Ide, Toshiaki Miyamoto, Takeshi Kochi, Takayuki Ogasawara, Makoto Yamamoto, Naoki Gonmori, Kenya Yamamoto, Toshitaka Yokoya, Maki Konishi, Seitaro Dohi, Isamu Kabe, Tetsuya Mizoue","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222703","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2024-222703","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions on human activities have greatly changed lifestyles, which might have deteriorated the cardiometabolic profile.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of cardiometabolic risk factors among Japanese workers in fiscal years (FY) 2020 and 2021 compared with the prepandemic period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study comprised an average of 71 025 employees in Japan who underwent annual health check-ups for at least two successive years from 2015 to 2021. Annual incidence rates from 2016 to 2021 were assessed for obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and metabolic syndrome (MetS). The observed incidence rates in 2020 and 2021 were compared with the predicted incidence based on prepandemic trends (2016 to 2019).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to the prepandemic, the incidence of all the outcomes, except for dyslipidaemia, significantly increased in 2020. Between FY 2016 and 2019, the adjusted mean incidence of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and MetS was 5.0%, 1.4%, 5.3%, 17.4% and 7.6%, respectively. In FY 2020, the adjusted incidence (95% CI) of these outcomes increased to 6.02 (5.80 to 6.24), 1.84 (1.73 to 1.96), 6.62 (6.40 to 6.83), 19.31 (18.83 to 19.78) and 8.51 (8.23 to 8.78), which were higher than the predicted incidence of 5.24 (4.99 to 5.49), 1.54 (1.41 to 1.67), 6.02 (5.76 to 6.27), 18.58 (18.00 to 19.16) and 8.05 (7.71 to 8.38) for 2020, respectively. The incidence returned to the prepandemic levels in FY 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results showed a worsening of the cardiometabolic profile during the initial year of the pandemic, which was reverted in the second year to the levels before the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"193-199"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142481294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-10DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222704
Pauline Pouchin, Genin Michaël, Bara Simona, Vigneron Nicolas, Guy Launoy, Joséphine Bryère
Background: The incidence of lung cancer is unequally distributed in France. Although several studies have shown a link between the socioeconomic environment of populations and the incidence of cancer, the contribution has not been quantified. We aimed to analyse the geographical variability of lung cancer incidence in Normandy and calculate the proportion explained by the socioeconomic environment.
Methods: We included 7665 lung cancer cases recorded in the General Tumor Registry of Calvados and the Cancer Registry of Manche. A Bayesian model was used to map the spatial variation in the incidence of lung cancer in the territory, and an innovative approach was used to evaluate the influence of geographical variability in the socioeconomic environment on the spatial heterogeneity of lung cancer incidence.
Results: The maps of the spatial components showed high contrasts for both genders, and the socioeconomic environment integration in the model made the maps less contrasting. The socioeconomic environment of the population explained one-third of the spatial variation in the incidence of lung cancer in women and one-fifth in men.
Conclusion: The results showed that a non-negligible part of the spatial variation in the incidence of lung cancer could be explained by the geographical distribution of the socioeconomic environment.
{"title":"Geographical variability in cancer incidence explained by the socioeconomic environment: an example of lung cancer in northwestern France.","authors":"Pauline Pouchin, Genin Michaël, Bara Simona, Vigneron Nicolas, Guy Launoy, Joséphine Bryère","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222704","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2024-222704","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of lung cancer is unequally distributed in France. Although several studies have shown a link between the socioeconomic environment of populations and the incidence of cancer, the contribution has not been quantified. We aimed to analyse the geographical variability of lung cancer incidence in Normandy and calculate the proportion explained by the socioeconomic environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 7665 lung cancer cases recorded in the General Tumor Registry of Calvados and the Cancer Registry of Manche. A Bayesian model was used to map the spatial variation in the incidence of lung cancer in the territory, and an innovative approach was used to evaluate the influence of geographical variability in the socioeconomic environment on the spatial heterogeneity of lung cancer incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maps of the spatial components showed high contrasts for both genders, and the socioeconomic environment integration in the model made the maps less contrasting. The socioeconomic environment of the population explained one-third of the spatial variation in the incidence of lung cancer in women and one-fifth in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that a non-negligible part of the spatial variation in the incidence of lung cancer could be explained by the geographical distribution of the socioeconomic environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"200-206"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142564005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-10DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222350
Sophia L Freije, Maeve Wallace, M Pia Chaparro
Background: In the USA, states can set higher minimum wages than the federal government. We investigated the association between state minimum wages and racial/ethnic inequities in food insecurity.
Methods: Household-level food insecurity and sociodemographic data were obtained from the cross-sectional Current Population Survey 2015-2019 (n=189 665 households) and merged by state and year with minimum wage and cost-of-living data obtained from the US Department of Labor and US Bureau of Economic Analysis, respectively. We fitted Poisson regression models with robust standard errors with 12-month or 30-day household food insecurity as the outcome, and minimum wage or inflation-adjusted minimum wage (ie, real wage) as the predictor, adjusting for cost of living, sociodemographic covariates and state fixed-effects. We tested interactions between minimum wage and race/ethnicity and ran race/ethnicity-stratified models.
Results: In adjusted models, the real wage was not associated with 12-month or 30-day food insecurity. Minimum wage was associated with 5% lower prevalence rate of 12-month food insecurity (PR 0.95, 95% CI=0.93 to 0.98) and 7% lower prevalence rate of 30-day food insecurity (PR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.96) for all households. The interaction p values for race/ethnicity with real wage and minimum wage were p<0.001. In stratified models, results were statistically significant for minimum wage and 12-month food insecurity among non-Hispanic (NH) white households (PR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) and Hispanic households (PR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), and minimum wage and 30-day food insecurity among NH white (PR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96), NH black (PR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.99) and Hispanic (PR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.95) households.
Conclusions: Higher state-level minimum wages, but not real wages, were associated with lower food insecurity prevalence overall and for racial/ethnic subgroups.
背景:在美国,各州可以制定比联邦政府更高的最低工资标准。方法:家庭层面的食品不安全和社会人口数据来自 2015-2019 年横截面当前人口调查(n=189 665 个家庭),并按州和年份与分别从美国劳工部和美国经济分析局获得的最低工资和生活费用数据合并。我们以 12 个月或 30 天的家庭粮食不安全状况为结果,以最低工资或通货膨胀调整后的最低工资(即实际工资)为预测因素,用稳健标准误差拟合了泊松回归模型,并对生活成本、社会人口协变量和州固定效应进行了调整。我们测试了最低工资与种族/族裔之间的交互作用,并运行了种族/族裔分层模型:在调整后的模型中,实际工资与 12 个月或 30 天的粮食不安全无关。最低工资与所有家庭的 12 个月粮食不安全发生率降低 5%(PR 0.95,95% CI=0.93-0.98)和 30 天粮食不安全发生率降低 7%(PR 0.93,95% CI 0.91-0.96)有关。种族/民族与实际工资和最低工资的交互 p 值为 p 结论:较高的州级最低工资(而非实际工资)与较低的总体和种族/民族亚群的粮食不安全发生率相关。
{"title":"Overall and race-specific associations between state-level minimum wage policy and food insecurity in the United States.","authors":"Sophia L Freije, Maeve Wallace, M Pia Chaparro","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222350","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2024-222350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the USA, states can set higher minimum wages than the federal government. We investigated the association between state minimum wages and racial/ethnic inequities in food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Household-level food insecurity and sociodemographic data were obtained from the cross-sectional Current Population Survey 2015-2019 (n=189 665 households) and merged by state and year with minimum wage and cost-of-living data obtained from the US Department of Labor and US Bureau of Economic Analysis, respectively. We fitted Poisson regression models with robust standard errors with 12-month or 30-day household food insecurity as the outcome, and minimum wage or inflation-adjusted minimum wage (ie, real wage) as the predictor, adjusting for cost of living, sociodemographic covariates and state fixed-effects. We tested interactions between minimum wage and race/ethnicity and ran race/ethnicity-stratified models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adjusted models, the real wage was not associated with 12-month or 30-day food insecurity. Minimum wage was associated with 5% lower prevalence rate of 12-month food insecurity (PR 0.95, 95% CI=0.93 to 0.98) and 7% lower prevalence rate of 30-day food insecurity (PR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.96) for all households. The interaction p values for race/ethnicity with real wage and minimum wage were p<0.001. In stratified models, results were statistically significant for minimum wage and 12-month food insecurity among non-Hispanic (NH) white households (PR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) and Hispanic households (PR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98), and minimum wage and 30-day food insecurity among NH white (PR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96), NH black (PR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.99) and Hispanic (PR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.95) households.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher state-level minimum wages, but not real wages, were associated with lower food insecurity prevalence overall and for racial/ethnic subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"153-158"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-10DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222470
Rejoice E A Churchill, Isaac Koomson, Sefa Awaworyi Churchill
Background: Alcohol misuse is a major public health issue. Understanding factors that contribute to alcohol misuse or risky drinking behaviour is important for policy. This study examined if crime rates in the neighbourhood (postcode) where a person lives influences their likelihood of engaging in risky drinking behaviour. We further explored social capital and mental health as channels through which neighbourhood crime influences risky drinking behaviour.
Methods: Using 18 waves of household longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey for the period 2002 to 2019 merged with official police statistics on neighbourhood crime rates, we adopted fixed-effect regression models that allow us to address concerns relating to endogenous sorting of participants as well as omitted variable bias.
Results: We find that an increase in neighbourhood crime is associated with an increase in the likelihood of risky drinking (OR=1.107, 95% CI 1.073 to 1.120), alcohol expenditure (b=0.063, 95% CI 0.041 to 0.076), alcohol consumption frequency (b=0.071, 95% CI 0.055 to 0.083) and quantity (b=0.046, 95% CI 0.032 to 0.052). We present exploratory evidence that social capital and mental health mediate the relationship between neighbourhood crime and alcohol use. Specifically, our results suggest that by eroding the level of trust and decreasing mental health, neighbourhood crime tends to increase the probability that people engage in risky alcohol behaviour.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that targeting crime and in particular the channels through which crime influences risky alcohol behaviour (ie, trust and mental health) can be instrumental in addressing alcohol misuse.
背景:酒精滥用是一个重大的公共卫生问题。了解导致酒精滥用或危险饮酒行为的因素对于制定政策非常重要。本研究探讨了一个人所居住社区(邮编)的犯罪率是否会影响其从事危险饮酒行为的可能性。我们进一步探讨了社会资本和心理健康作为邻里犯罪影响危险饮酒行为的渠道:我们利用 2002 年至 2019 年期间澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查(Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey)中的 18 波家庭纵向数据以及警方关于邻里犯罪率的官方统计数据,采用了固定效应回归模型,从而解决了与参与者内生排序以及遗漏变量偏差有关的问题:我们发现,邻里犯罪率的上升与风险饮酒可能性(OR=1.107,95% CI 1.073 至 1.120)、酒精支出(b=0.063,95% CI 0.041 至 0.076)、酒精消费频率(b=0.071,95% CI 0.055 至 0.083)和数量(b=0.046,95% CI 0.032 至 0.052)的上升相关。我们提出的探索性证据表明,社会资本和心理健康是邻里犯罪与饮酒之间关系的中介。具体来说,我们的研究结果表明,通过削弱信任水平和降低心理健康水平,邻里犯罪往往会增加人们从事危险饮酒行为的概率:我们的研究结果表明,针对犯罪,尤其是针对犯罪影响危险饮酒行为的渠道(即信任和心理健康),有助于解决酒精滥用问题。
{"title":"Local area crime and alcohol consumption: longitudinal evidence from Australia.","authors":"Rejoice E A Churchill, Isaac Koomson, Sefa Awaworyi Churchill","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222470","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2024-222470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol misuse is a major public health issue. Understanding factors that contribute to alcohol misuse or risky drinking behaviour is important for policy. This study examined if crime rates in the neighbourhood (postcode) where a person lives influences their likelihood of engaging in risky drinking behaviour. We further explored social capital and mental health as channels through which neighbourhood crime influences risky drinking behaviour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 18 waves of household longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey for the period 2002 to 2019 merged with official police statistics on neighbourhood crime rates, we adopted fixed-effect regression models that allow us to address concerns relating to endogenous sorting of participants as well as omitted variable bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that an increase in neighbourhood crime is associated with an increase in the likelihood of risky drinking (OR=1.107, 95% CI 1.073 to 1.120), alcohol expenditure (<i>b</i>=0.063, 95% CI 0.041 to 0.076), alcohol consumption frequency (<i>b</i>=0.071, 95% CI 0.055 to 0.083) and quantity (<i>b</i>=0.046, 95% CI 0.032 to 0.052). We present exploratory evidence that social capital and mental health mediate the relationship between neighbourhood crime and alcohol use. Specifically, our results suggest that by eroding the level of trust and decreasing mental health, neighbourhood crime tends to increase the probability that people engage in risky alcohol behaviour.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that targeting crime and in particular the channels through which crime influences risky alcohol behaviour (ie, trust and mental health) can be instrumental in addressing alcohol misuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"159-164"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-10DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222463
Dorien Beeres, Maria Rosaria Galanti, Maria Nilsson, Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström
Background: As prevalence of tobacco use falls, socioeconomic inequalities in tobacco use are increasing in many high-income countries. Evidence is lacking on the effect of preventive interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation among adolescents. We evaluated whether a multicomponent school-based prevention programme with parental involvement has differential effects on smoking initiation across socioeconomic groups and affects the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation.
Methods: A secondary analysis of data from a 3-year cluster randomised controlled trial, the TOPAS study, conducted in Sweden from 2018 to 2021. Schools were randomised either to the full programme (Tobacco-Free Duo, T-DUO) or minimal intervention (EDU). The analysis was conducted according to intention to treat for the primary outcome, the probability of remaining a non-user of cigarettes at the end of compulsory school (ages 15-16). Parents' educational attainment was the socioeconomic variable. Differential effects were analysed by comparing adolescents exposed to T-DUO with those exposed to EDU within each socioeconomic group. The effect of the intervention on the magnitude of inequalities was analysed by comparing several measures of absolute and relative inequalities between T-DUO and EDU.
Results: At the end of follow-up, the full programme had a similar, at most moderate effect on smoking initiation in all socioeconomic groups (relative risk 1.13 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.25) in the middle group). The programme did not significantly affect the magnitude of inequalities (Slope Index of Inequality difference 1.49 (95% CI -15.34 to 18.32)).
Discussion: Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation remain substantial. Our results indicate the absence of an effect of the programme T-DUO on these inequalities.
背景:在许多高收入国家,随着烟草使用率的下降,烟草使用中的社会经济不平等现象却在加剧。预防性干预措施对青少年吸烟的社会经济不平等的影响尚缺乏证据。我们评估了一项有家长参与的多成分校本预防计划是否对不同社会经济群体的吸烟率有不同的影响,以及是否会影响吸烟率中社会经济不平等的程度:对2018年至2021年在瑞典进行的为期3年的群组随机对照试验--TOPAS研究的数据进行二次分析。学校被随机分配到完整计划(Tobacco-Free Duo,T-DUO)或最小干预(EDU)中。对主要结果(义务教育结束时(15-16 岁)仍不吸烟的概率)的分析按照意向治疗进行。父母的教育程度是社会经济变量。通过比较每个社会经济组别中接受 T-DUO 与接受 EDU 的青少年,对差异效果进行了分析。通过比较 T-DUO 和 EDU 的绝对和相对不平等程度,分析了干预对不平等程度的影响:在随访结束时,整个项目对所有社会经济群体的吸烟率都有类似的、最多是中等程度的影响(中间群体的相对风险为 1.13(95% CI 1.02 至 1.25))。该计划并未对不平等程度产生明显影响(不平等差异斜率指数 1.49 (95% CI -15.34至18.32)):讨论:吸烟人群中的社会经济不平等现象依然严重。我们的研究结果表明,T-DUO 计划并未对这些不平等现象产生影响。
{"title":"Effect of a multicomponent school-based intervention with parental involvement on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation: equity impact analysis of the TOPAS study.","authors":"Dorien Beeres, Maria Rosaria Galanti, Maria Nilsson, Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222463","DOIUrl":"10.1136/jech-2024-222463","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As prevalence of tobacco use falls, socioeconomic inequalities in tobacco use are increasing in many high-income countries. Evidence is lacking on the effect of preventive interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation among adolescents. We evaluated whether a multicomponent school-based prevention programme with parental involvement has differential effects on smoking initiation across socioeconomic groups and affects the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of data from a 3-year cluster randomised controlled trial, the TOPAS study, conducted in Sweden from 2018 to 2021. Schools were randomised either to the full programme (Tobacco-Free Duo, T-DUO) or minimal intervention (EDU). The analysis was conducted according to intention to treat for the primary outcome, the probability of remaining a non-user of cigarettes at the end of compulsory school (ages 15-16). Parents' educational attainment was the socioeconomic variable. Differential effects were analysed by comparing adolescents exposed to T-DUO with those exposed to EDU within each socioeconomic group. The effect of the intervention on the magnitude of inequalities was analysed by comparing several measures of absolute and relative inequalities between T-DUO and EDU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of follow-up, the full programme had a similar, at most moderate effect on smoking initiation in all socioeconomic groups (relative risk 1.13 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.25) in the middle group). The programme did not significantly affect the magnitude of inequalities (Slope Index of Inequality difference 1.49 (95% CI -15.34 to 18.32)).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking initiation remain substantial. Our results indicate the absence of an effect of the programme T-DUO on these inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"227-232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874375/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142632941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-07DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-223341
Marie Ørskov, Lasse Jørgensen Cehofski, Torben Bjerregaard Larsen, Toke Bek, Flemming Skjøth, Henrik Vorum
Objectives: This study aims to study the association between socioeconomic factors and risk of prevalent eye diseases, including glaucoma, cataract and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in an elderly Danish population.
Design: This study was a nationwide cohort study.
Setting and participants: The included subjects were extracted from Danish nationwide health registers, and the association between socioeconomic factors and prevalent eye diseases was assessed by estimating the incidence rate and the cumulative incidence. The differences between the investigated groups were quantified using the Cox proportional hazard model.
Results: Based on a 10-year follow-up period, the highest levels of education and household income were associated with higher rates and risks of glaucoma compared with the lowest and middle levels. This results in absolute risks ranging from 3.2% (3.1%-3.3%) in both the lowest educational and income group to 4.0% (3.9-4.1%) and 3.8% (3.8-3.9%) in the highest educational and income group, respectively. For cataract, the middle and lowest educational and income levels were associated with increased rates and risks, which were statistically significant compared with the highest levels. The risk of cataract ranged from 6.5% (6.4%-6.7%) to 8.1% (8.0%-8.2%) and 6.0% (5.9%-6.1%) to 8.7% (8.5%-8.8%) in the highest to the lowest educational and income group, respectively. For RVO, the event rate was low, showing no statistically significant differences. The risk of RVO remained constant in all investigated socioeconomic groups, with a risk of 0.3% (0.3%-0.3%).
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that socioeconomic factors, such as education and household income, are associated with the diagnosis glaucoma and cataract. Incorporating socioeconomic considerations into public health initiatives may enhance the management of eye diseases and improve information and awareness about these conditions.
{"title":"Socioeconomic factors and the risk of eye diseases in an elderly Danish population.","authors":"Marie Ørskov, Lasse Jørgensen Cehofski, Torben Bjerregaard Larsen, Toke Bek, Flemming Skjøth, Henrik Vorum","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-223341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-223341","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to study the association between socioeconomic factors and risk of prevalent eye diseases, including glaucoma, cataract and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in an elderly Danish population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a nationwide cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The included subjects were extracted from Danish nationwide health registers, and the association between socioeconomic factors and prevalent eye diseases was assessed by estimating the incidence rate and the cumulative incidence. The differences between the investigated groups were quantified using the Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on a 10-year follow-up period, the highest levels of education and household income were associated with higher rates and risks of glaucoma compared with the lowest and middle levels. This results in absolute risks ranging from 3.2% (3.1%-3.3%) in both the lowest educational and income group to 4.0% (3.9-4.1%) and 3.8% (3.8-3.9%) in the highest educational and income group, respectively. For cataract, the middle and lowest educational and income levels were associated with increased rates and risks, which were statistically significant compared with the highest levels. The risk of cataract ranged from 6.5% (6.4%-6.7%) to 8.1% (8.0%-8.2%) and 6.0% (5.9%-6.1%) to 8.7% (8.5%-8.8%) in the highest to the lowest educational and income group, respectively. For RVO, the event rate was low, showing no statistically significant differences. The risk of RVO remained constant in all investigated socioeconomic groups, with a risk of 0.3% (0.3%-0.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that socioeconomic factors, such as education and household income, are associated with the diagnosis glaucoma and cataract. Incorporating socioeconomic considerations into public health initiatives may enhance the management of eye diseases and improve information and awareness about these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143371137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28DOI: 10.1136/jech-2024-222762
Gina Agarwal, Homa Keshavarz, Ricardo Angeles, Melissa Pirrie, Francine Marzanek, Francis Nguyen, Jasdeep Brar, J Michael Paterson
Background: Older adults living in social housing report poor health and access to healthcare services. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of chronic diseases, influenza vaccination and cancer screenings among social housing residents versus non-residents in Ontario, Canada.
Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study for all health-insured Ontarians alive and aged 40 or older as of 1 January 2020. Social housing residents were identified using postal codes. Validated health administrative data case definitions were used to identify individuals with diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, congestive heart failure and cardiovascular disease. Influenza vaccination and mammography, Pap and colorectal cancer screenings were identified among screen-eligible residents using health administrative data.
Results: The prevalence of all chronic diseases was higher among social housing residents across all age groups: 40-59, 60-79 and 80+ years. Influenza vaccination rates in 2018-2019 were lower among social housing residents aged 60-79 and 80+ years. Mammography rates for women aged 50-69 years in 2018-2019 were 10-11% lower among social housing residents across all age groups compared with non-residents. Pap screening rates for women aged 40-69 in 2018-2019 were 6-8% lower among social housing residents. The percentage of colorectal screening in both women and men aged 52-74 was lower (9-10% in men and 6-7% in women) in social housing compared with the general population in 2019-2020.
Conclusion: There is a higher prevalence of chronic diseases and lower cancer screening rates among the growing population of older adults in social housing in Ontario, Canada.
{"title":"Chronic disease prevalence and preventive care among Ontario social housing residents compared with the general population: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Gina Agarwal, Homa Keshavarz, Ricardo Angeles, Melissa Pirrie, Francine Marzanek, Francis Nguyen, Jasdeep Brar, J Michael Paterson","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222762","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222762","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults living in social housing report poor health and access to healthcare services. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of chronic diseases, influenza vaccination and cancer screenings among social housing residents versus non-residents in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based cohort study for all health-insured Ontarians alive and aged 40 or older as of 1 January 2020. Social housing residents were identified using postal codes. Validated health administrative data case definitions were used to identify individuals with diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, congestive heart failure and cardiovascular disease. Influenza vaccination and mammography, Pap and colorectal cancer screenings were identified among screen-eligible residents using health administrative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of all chronic diseases was higher among social housing residents across all age groups: 40-59, 60-79 and 80+ years. Influenza vaccination rates in 2018-2019 were lower among social housing residents aged 60-79 and 80+ years. Mammography rates for women aged 50-69 years in 2018-2019 were 10-11% lower among social housing residents across all age groups compared with non-residents. Pap screening rates for women aged 40-69 in 2018-2019 were 6-8% lower among social housing residents. The percentage of colorectal screening in both women and men aged 52-74 was lower (9-10% in men and 6-7% in women) in social housing compared with the general population in 2019-2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a higher prevalence of chronic diseases and lower cancer screening rates among the growing population of older adults in social housing in Ontario, Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143061495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and the risk of postoperative depression in patients undergoing major surgery.
Methods: Data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database were analysed for patients aged over 20 years who underwent major surgery between 2004 and 2018. CPSP was defined as the use of prescribed analgesics for over 3 months postsurgery, with a prescription exceeding 90 cumulative defined daily doses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to match patients with and without CPSP. Cox regression analysis and competing risk analysis were conducted to evaluate the risk of postoperative depression in the CPSP group compared with the no CPSP group.
Results: Before PSM, 141 466 patients were included, with 37 303 (26.37%) experiencing CPSP. After PSM, 74 606 patients were matched in both groups. The incidence of depression was significantly higher in the CPSP group compared with the no CPSP group (p<0.0001). Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly elevated risk of depression in the CPSP group (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI 1.35 to 1.48; p<0.0001), which persisted across various adjustment models and competing risk analysis. The cumulative depression risk increased over the follow-up period.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates a strong association between CPSP and postoperative depression risk. Addressing CPSP may offer a promising approach to reducing the incidence of postoperative depression and its socioeconomic and familial burdens. Further research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimise preventive interventions.
{"title":"Chronic postsurgical pain increases postoperative depression risk.","authors":"Mingyang Sun, Xiaolin Wang, Zhongyuan Lu, Yitian Yang, Shuang Lv, Mengrong Miao, Wan-Ming Chen, Szu-Yuan Wu, Jiaqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-222761","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222761","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and the risk of postoperative depression in patients undergoing major surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database were analysed for patients aged over 20 years who underwent major surgery between 2004 and 2018. CPSP was defined as the use of prescribed analgesics for over 3 months postsurgery, with a prescription exceeding 90 cumulative defined daily doses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to match patients with and without CPSP. Cox regression analysis and competing risk analysis were conducted to evaluate the risk of postoperative depression in the CPSP group compared with the no CPSP group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before PSM, 141 466 patients were included, with 37 303 (26.37%) experiencing CPSP. After PSM, 74 606 patients were matched in both groups. The incidence of depression was significantly higher in the CPSP group compared with the no CPSP group (p<0.0001). Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly elevated risk of depression in the CPSP group (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI 1.35 to 1.48; p<0.0001), which persisted across various adjustment models and competing risk analysis. The cumulative depression risk increased over the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates a strong association between CPSP and postoperative depression risk. Addressing CPSP may offer a promising approach to reducing the incidence of postoperative depression and its socioeconomic and familial burdens. Further research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimise preventive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143016245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}