Joint Bone Spine最新文献

Targeted therapy has revolutionized the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) over the last fifteen years. Rituximab, an approved induction and maintenance agent for severe AAV, is no less effective than cyclophosphamide as induction therapy and particularly useful in relapsing or refractory disease, or in women. In patients with relapsing AAV, granulomatosis with polyangiitis or PR3-ANCA, it is more effective than cyclophosphamide. Rituximab maintenance is superior to the conventional immunosuppressive drugs that it replaces. Low-dose preemptive rituximab infusions are recommended every 6 months for 18 months, followed by re-evaluation to decide whether 4 additional biannual infusions should be administered, balancing the probability of relapse and the risk of serious infections on rituximab. A growing body of experimental and clinical data shows that C5a pathway inhibition is a promising therapeutic option for AAV, which could reduce glucocorticoids needs. Avacopan is a first approved oral C5A receptor antagonist, used when there is a high risk that glucocorticoids will cause serious adverse events. In eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, the importance of IL-5 for eosinophil activation and survival led to evaluation and approval of mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against IL-5. Mepolizumab showed a steroid-sparing effect. Its effectiveness in active vasculitis remains uncertain and is currently being evaluated. Benralizumab targeting the IL-5 receptor was recently shown to be noninferior to mepolizumab. Rituximab has had disappointing results in non-severe active vasculitis and is being evaluated as maintenance therapy. Plasma exchange is not indicated as first-line treatment but remains recommended when creatinine levels exceed 300 μmol/L.

Objective

Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is a heterogenous disease characterised by a large panel of autoantibodies and a wide spectrum of clinical signs and symptoms that engender different outcomes. We aimed to identify distinct, homogeneous SLE patients’ phenotypes.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled SLE patients meeting the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria, enrolled in the French multicentre “APS (antiphospholipid syndrome) and SLE” Registry. Based on 29 variables selected to cover a broad range of clinical and laboratory (excluding autoantibodies) SLE manifestations, unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis followed by hierarchical ascendent-clustering analysis assigned different phenotypes.

Results

We included 440 patients, mostly women (94.3%). Median age at SLE diagnosis was 24 (IQR 19–32) years. Cluster analysis yielded three distinct subgroups based on cumulative clinical manifestations, not autoantibody pattern. Cluster 1 (n = 91) comprised mostly Caucasian patients, with APS-associated clinical and biological manifestations, e.g., livedo, seizure, thrombocytopaenia and haemolytic anaemia. Cluster 2 (n = 221), the largest, included patients with mild clinical manifestations, mainly articular, more frequently associated with Sjögren's syndrome and with less frequent autoantibody-positivity. Cluster 3 (n = 128) consisted of patients with the largest panel of SLE-specific clinical manifestations (cutaneous, articular, proliferative nephritis, pleural, cardiac and haematological), the most frequent autoantibody-positivity, low complement levels, and more often of Asian and sub-Saharan African origin.

Conclusion

This unsupervised clustering method distinguished three distinct SLE patient subgroups, highlighting SLE heterogeneity.

Objective

Previous studies have provided evidence that the discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and chloroquine (CQ), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of disease flares, with limited information on the level of disease activity at the time of HCQ/CQ discontinuation. Here we aimed to describe the risk of SLE flare after withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission.

Methods

Case-control study (1:2) comparing the evolution of patients with SLE after HCQ/CQ withdrawal for antimalarial retinopathy (cases) with patients with SLE matched for sex, antimalarial treatment duration and age at SLE diagnosis, whose antimalarial treatment was continued throughout the entire follow-up period (controls). To be included in the study, patients had to be in remission for at least one year according to the DORIS classification. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient experiencing a flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index after a 36-month follow-up.

Results

We studied 48 cases and 96 controls. The proportion of patients experiencing a flare was significantly higher in the HCQ/CQ withdrawal group as compared to the maintenance group (15 [31.3%] patients versus 12 [12.5%]; OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.2–8.2], P = 0.01). Withdrawal of HCQ/CQ was inferior with respect to occurrence of severe SLE flare (12 [25.0%] vs 11 [11.5%]; OR 2.5 [95%CI 0.9–6.9], P = 0.053) and time to first flare (HR 6.3 [2.0–19.9], P < 0.005). Elevated serum levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies were identified as a risk factor for SLE flare following HCQ/CQ discontinuation (HR 5.4 [1.5–18.7], P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse.