Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-08DOI: 10.1177/00469580251355826
Chia-Ming Yen
Live-in migrant care workers constitute a vital labor force in home-based eldercare in Taiwan; where demographic changes have heightened the demand for such assistant. Despite this, qualitative research exploring the experiences of family caregivers who employ these workers for relatives with dementia remains scarce in the Taiwanese context. This qualitative study aimed to investigate the motivations behind families' decisions to hire migrant workers for home-based dementia care within Taiwan, as well as to assess the associated benefits and challenges they encounter. In-depth interviews were conducted with 4 family caregivers, aged between 52 and 63 years, who had hired live-in migrant care workers between April and August 2022. The transcripts from these interviews were analyzed thematically to derive insights from the findings. The results revealed that family caregivers in Taiwan opted to hire migrant workers for dementia care following a thorough evaluation of their personal circumstances and available resources. Live-in migrant care workers acted as surrogate caregivers, enabling family members to alleviate their daily caregiving burden, improve their emotional well-being, and sustain their personal lives. However, family caregivers faced several challenges, including resistance from dementia-affected relatives toward migrant workers, difficulties in recruiting care workers amidst fluctuating external conditions, and instances of migrant care workers displaying irresponsibility or lacking essential knowledge and skills related to dementia care. Notably, as family caregivers' understanding of dementia evolved, they recognized the critical need to utilize public long-term care services to bolster the dementia-related knowledge and skills of their migrant employees. The study suggests implementing additional dementia-specific training programs tailored for both family caregivers and live-in migrant care workers in Taiwan. Such initiatives would enhance caregiving knowledge and competencies, ultimately improving the quality of life for both caregivers and care recipients.
{"title":"Understanding Family Caregivers' Experiences With Live-in Migrant Care Workers in Dementia Care: Challenges and Perspectives From a Qualitative Study in Taiwan.","authors":"Chia-Ming Yen","doi":"10.1177/00469580251355826","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251355826","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Live-in migrant care workers constitute a vital labor force in home-based eldercare in Taiwan; where demographic changes have heightened the demand for such assistant. Despite this, qualitative research exploring the experiences of family caregivers who employ these workers for relatives with dementia remains scarce in the Taiwanese context. This qualitative study aimed to investigate the motivations behind families' decisions to hire migrant workers for home-based dementia care within Taiwan, as well as to assess the associated benefits and challenges they encounter. In-depth interviews were conducted with 4 family caregivers, aged between 52 and 63 years, who had hired live-in migrant care workers between April and August 2022. The transcripts from these interviews were analyzed thematically to derive insights from the findings. The results revealed that family caregivers in Taiwan opted to hire migrant workers for dementia care following a thorough evaluation of their personal circumstances and available resources. Live-in migrant care workers acted as surrogate caregivers, enabling family members to alleviate their daily caregiving burden, improve their emotional well-being, and sustain their personal lives. However, family caregivers faced several challenges, including resistance from dementia-affected relatives toward migrant workers, difficulties in recruiting care workers amidst fluctuating external conditions, and instances of migrant care workers displaying irresponsibility or lacking essential knowledge and skills related to dementia care. Notably, as family caregivers' understanding of dementia evolved, they recognized the critical need to utilize public long-term care services to bolster the dementia-related knowledge and skills of their migrant employees. The study suggests implementing additional dementia-specific training programs tailored for both family caregivers and live-in migrant care workers in Taiwan. Such initiatives would enhance caregiving knowledge and competencies, ultimately improving the quality of life for both caregivers and care recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251355826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254537/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-16DOI: 10.1177/00469580251365821
Anik Dubé, Stéphanie Collin, Jennifer Hakim, Claire Johnson, Marie-Eve Laforest, Michel H Landry, Martin Lauzier
In Canada, healthcare reforms typically aim to improve the quality of care and access while making healthcare systems more efficient. These reforms have led to a 2-level healthcare system consisting of provincial and regional health authorities (RHAs). RHAs are responsible for providing and administering health services within specific territories. One of the 2 language-based RHAs in New Brunswick (NB) operates in French-speaking rural minority communities. This study explored key factors affecting the retention of nurses and physicians within a RHA operating in a language minority context. This descriptive qualitative study explored how macro-level decisions are experienced on the frontlines. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 21 physicians and 37 registered nurses, as well as 2 focus groups involving 20 key informants in managerial roles. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes. Three main factors emerged: organizational accountability and frustration, local autonomy and contextual responsiveness, and a culture of openness and perceived loss of control. These factors are associated with policy changes that affect operational settings and resource distribution within the RHA and influence the retention of nurses and physicians. Stakeholders in health system reforms, including governments and RHAs, must recognize that policy adjustments can have direct implications on everyday care. Participants expressed a growing disconnect from decision-making hierarchies and a perceived loss of control. Both are seen as barriers to delivering quality care. Ensuring adequate support and resources for implementing system-level changes is key to fostering professional engagement and enhancing job satisfaction.
{"title":"From Policy to Practice: A Qualitative Study on Reforms and Frontline Retention in Healthcare.","authors":"Anik Dubé, Stéphanie Collin, Jennifer Hakim, Claire Johnson, Marie-Eve Laforest, Michel H Landry, Martin Lauzier","doi":"10.1177/00469580251365821","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251365821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Canada, healthcare reforms typically aim to improve the quality of care and access while making healthcare systems more efficient. These reforms have led to a 2-level healthcare system consisting of provincial and regional health authorities (RHAs). RHAs are responsible for providing and administering health services within specific territories. One of the 2 language-based RHAs in New Brunswick (NB) operates in French-speaking rural minority communities. This study explored key factors affecting the retention of nurses and physicians within a RHA operating in a language minority context. This descriptive qualitative study explored how macro-level decisions are experienced on the frontlines. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 21 physicians and 37 registered nurses, as well as 2 focus groups involving 20 key informants in managerial roles. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes. Three main factors emerged: organizational accountability and frustration, local autonomy and contextual responsiveness, and a culture of openness and perceived loss of control. These factors are associated with policy changes that affect operational settings and resource distribution within the RHA and influence the retention of nurses and physicians. Stakeholders in health system reforms, including governments and RHAs, must recognize that policy adjustments can have direct implications on everyday care. Participants expressed a growing disconnect from decision-making hierarchies and a perceived loss of control. Both are seen as barriers to delivering quality care. Ensuring adequate support and resources for implementing system-level changes is key to fostering professional engagement and enhancing job satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251365821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357990/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144859958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Literatures shows that poor air quality index (AQI) is associated with several adverse health impacts, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, cancer, pneumonia, cataracts, heart diseases, and mental health disorders. Nepal, one of the lower-middle-income countries, has become vulnerable to adverse health impacts due to poor AQI over time. The capital city of Nepal, Kathmandu, is frequently placed as one of the most polluted cities by IQAir. As such, this statement marks a caution for policymakers and the public to be aware of the future effects of prolonged exposure to air pollution and highlights its causative factors. To solve this burgeoning issue, because of the significant rise in urbanization and population growth, mitigation strategies such as creating awareness, reducing vehicular emission, reducing forest fires, creating and identifying vulnerability maps risk zones for forest fires, switching to electronic vehicles and personal interventions such as staying indoors and reducing physical outdoor activity, wearing face masks must be focused and given priority. Although our study is limited in its methodology and findings, it helps establish a policy base to underscore the need for longitudinal cohort studies to generate further evidences pertaining to not up to par air quality levels and their subsequent health impacts in the Nepalese population.
{"title":"Adverse Health Consequences of Poor Air Quality in Nepal: A Wake-Up Call.","authors":"Nabin Pathak, Shreya Dhungana, Prashant Bidari, Sunil Shrestha, Meghnath Dhimal","doi":"10.1177/00469580251375858","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251375858","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Literatures shows that poor air quality index (AQI) is associated with several adverse health impacts, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, cancer, pneumonia, cataracts, heart diseases, and mental health disorders. Nepal, one of the lower-middle-income countries, has become vulnerable to adverse health impacts due to poor AQI over time. The capital city of Nepal, Kathmandu, is frequently placed as one of the most polluted cities by IQAir. As such, this statement marks a caution for policymakers and the public to be aware of the future effects of prolonged exposure to air pollution and highlights its causative factors. To solve this burgeoning issue, because of the significant rise in urbanization and population growth, mitigation strategies such as creating awareness, reducing vehicular emission, reducing forest fires, creating and identifying vulnerability maps risk zones for forest fires, switching to electronic vehicles and personal interventions such as staying indoors and reducing physical outdoor activity, wearing face masks must be focused and given priority. Although our study is limited in its methodology and findings, it helps establish a policy base to underscore the need for longitudinal cohort studies to generate further evidences pertaining to not up to par air quality levels and their subsequent health impacts in the Nepalese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251375858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441282/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145071085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1177/00469580251376234
Asia S Ivey, Julia J Lund, Amanda J Aubel, Shani A L Buggs
The discourse on community violence has expanded over the years, shifting from a focus on interpersonal physical harm to a broader understanding that includes systemic and structural harm. Structural violence, characterized by institutionalized inequities in health, education, and generational wealth, disproportionately impacts marginalized communities and reflects deliberate systems of oppression designed to maintain power imbalances. In community-based violence intervention and prevention (CVIP), identifying how harm can be systematically perpetuated is critical for developing and advancing structurally grounded evaluative measures and training strategies for practitioners. This qualitative study involved interviews and focus groups with community violence intervention (CVI) practitioners (N = 45) from Sacramento, Milwaukee, and Baltimore. We analyzed participants' narratives to explore their understandings of the root causes of community-based firearm violence, with particular attention to the core tenets of structural violence: power, marginalization, oppression, adversity, and trauma. Findings revealed that CVI practitioners hold varying levels of structural violence expertise, ranging from individual-level explanations of violence to critical accounts of how systemic forces cultivate and reproduce structural harm. Participants discussed how government divestment, institutional neglect, and collective and vicarious trauma shape the conditions contributing to community violence. Their reflections underscore the need for standardized training and professional development that embeds structural frameworks into CVIP operations and program evaluations. As key actors in CVIP, CVI practitioners must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to address the structural drivers of community violence. Investing in their capacity for research and advocacy will strengthen the field's effectiveness, scale, and legitimacy in preventing community-based firearm violence through structurally informed practice and evaluation.
{"title":"Understanding Structural Violence in Community Violence Intervention (CVI): A Multi-City Qualitative Analysis of Practitioner Perspectives.","authors":"Asia S Ivey, Julia J Lund, Amanda J Aubel, Shani A L Buggs","doi":"10.1177/00469580251376234","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251376234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discourse on community violence has expanded over the years, shifting from a focus on interpersonal physical harm to a broader understanding that includes systemic and structural harm. Structural violence, characterized by institutionalized inequities in health, education, and generational wealth, disproportionately impacts marginalized communities and reflects deliberate systems of oppression designed to maintain power imbalances. In community-based violence intervention and prevention (CVIP), identifying how harm can be systematically perpetuated is critical for developing and advancing structurally grounded evaluative measures and training strategies for practitioners. This qualitative study involved interviews and focus groups with community violence intervention (CVI) practitioners (N = 45) from Sacramento, Milwaukee, and Baltimore. We analyzed participants' narratives to explore their understandings of the root causes of community-based firearm violence, with particular attention to the core tenets of structural violence: power, marginalization, oppression, adversity, and trauma. Findings revealed that CVI practitioners hold varying levels of structural violence expertise, ranging from individual-level explanations of violence to critical accounts of how systemic forces cultivate and reproduce structural harm. Participants discussed how government divestment, institutional neglect, and collective and vicarious trauma shape the conditions contributing to community violence. Their reflections underscore the need for standardized training and professional development that embeds structural frameworks into CVIP operations and program evaluations. As key actors in CVIP, CVI practitioners must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to address the structural drivers of community violence. Investing in their capacity for research and advocacy will strengthen the field's effectiveness, scale, and legitimacy in preventing community-based firearm violence through structurally informed practice and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251376234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441253/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145071146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer among women globally, despite being preventable with the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. However, HPV vaccine uptake remains a challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where cervical cancer elimination faces significant delays. The present study aims to identify the social determinants impacting HPV vaccine uptake in LMICs. This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies published between 2010 and 2025, identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Eligible studies reported HPV vaccine uptake (initiation, completion, or both) among adolescent girls aged 9 to 19 and examined at least 1 individual- or household-level social determinant. Data were thematically synthesized, and a meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eight studies, conducted in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda, were included. Key determinants assessed included age, religion, residence, parental education, occupation, wealth index, marital status, and household factors. Meta-analyses revealed wealth index (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05-1.70; P = .02) and parental marital status (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95; P < .01) as significant predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among adolescent girls in LMICs. Other factors, such as age, residence, parental education, etc., showed inconsistent effects or no significant association, with high heterogeneity across studies limiting the generalizability of some findings. This review highlights the complex, context-specific individual and household factors influencing HPV vaccine uptake among adolescent girls in LMICs. While wealth index and parental marital status showed consistent associations, other factors varied across studies. Community-based, culturally sensitive, tailored interventions are critical to improve the vaccine uptake. Continued research with standardized mixed-methods is vital to address multilevel factors and ensure equitable HPV vaccine uptake in LMICs.
{"title":"Social Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake Among Adolescent Girls in Low-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Pawan Kumar, Arindam Ray, Rhythm Hora, Amrita Kumari, Kapil Singh, Rashmi Mehra, Amanjot Kaur, Shyam Kumar Singh, Seema Singh Koshal, Vivek Kumar Singh, Abida Sultana, Syed F Quadri, Arup Deb Roy","doi":"10.1177/00469580251399368","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251399368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer among women globally, despite being preventable with the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. However, HPV vaccine uptake remains a challenge in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where cervical cancer elimination faces significant delays. The present study aims to identify the social determinants impacting HPV vaccine uptake in LMICs. This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies published between 2010 and 2025, identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Eligible studies reported HPV vaccine uptake (initiation, completion, or both) among adolescent girls aged 9 to 19 and examined at least 1 individual- or household-level social determinant. Data were thematically synthesized, and a meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model, with results expressed as odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eight studies, conducted in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda, were included. Key determinants assessed included age, religion, residence, parental education, occupation, wealth index, marital status, and household factors. Meta-analyses revealed wealth index (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05-1.70; <i>P</i> = .02) and parental marital status (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95; <i>P</i> < .01) as significant predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among adolescent girls in LMICs. Other factors, such as age, residence, parental education, etc., showed inconsistent effects or no significant association, with high heterogeneity across studies limiting the generalizability of some findings. This review highlights the complex, context-specific individual and household factors influencing HPV vaccine uptake among adolescent girls in LMICs. While wealth index and parental marital status showed consistent associations, other factors varied across studies. Community-based, culturally sensitive, tailored interventions are critical to improve the vaccine uptake. Continued research with standardized mixed-methods is vital to address multilevel factors and ensure equitable HPV vaccine uptake in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251399368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12743787/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-08DOI: 10.1177/00469580251352727
Stephanie Hartz, Alexander Garbin, Courtney McGuire, Jill Steagall, Jocelyn McCauliff, Kathryn Allen Nearing
Age Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) promote geriatric best practices to improve healthcare quality, minimize harms and support older adults' care preferences. AFHS-designated clinics consistently address the Geriatric 4Ms: Mentation, Mobility, Medication, and What Matters Most. The VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System tele-Palliative Care clinic achieved AFHS Level 1 and 2 recognition in 2021, becoming the first AFHS-designated telemedicine clinic in the nation. An interprofessional team and older Veterans guided planning and implementation. Using existing staff and clinic workflows, we consistently addressed the Geriatric 4Ms during visits. Specific metrics include: (1) AFHS Level 1 and 2 recognition, (2) maintenance in addressing Geriatric 4Ms in tele-Palliative Care, (3) number of patients served, (4) travel-miles saved. FY23-24, we conducted 192 AFHS tele-Palliative Care visits, 81% with rural/highly rural Veterans. We served 108 unique patients (FY23:57; FY24:51; percent decrease = 10.5%). Compared to Colorado's Veteran population, Veterans from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds and women were underrepresented; older Veterans were overrepresented. In FY23/FY24, the majority of patients were White (82%/73%), not Hispanic/Latino (83%/73%), male (100%/98%), and ≥65 (90%/89%). All 4Ms were addressed for 86% (FY23) and 76% (FY24) of unique patients. AFHS tele-Palliative Care saved Veterans/caregivers 23 622 (FY23) and 18 632 (FY24) miles of travel. Congruent with AFHS, Palliative Care focuses on physical, emotional, and psychosocial aspects of serious illness. AFHS designation in a tele-Palliative Care clinic is novel nationally. We demonstrated that evidence-based care can be provided to every older adult, regardless of care modality, without expanding staff or changing clinical workflows.
{"title":"Establishing First Age-Friendly Health System Tele-Palliative Care Clinic - Facilitators, Challenges, Lessons Learned to Improve Care for Rural, Older Veterans.","authors":"Stephanie Hartz, Alexander Garbin, Courtney McGuire, Jill Steagall, Jocelyn McCauliff, Kathryn Allen Nearing","doi":"10.1177/00469580251352727","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251352727","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Age Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) promote geriatric best practices to improve healthcare quality, minimize harms and support older adults' care preferences. AFHS-designated clinics consistently address the Geriatric 4Ms: Mentation, Mobility, Medication, and What Matters Most. The VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System tele-Palliative Care clinic achieved AFHS Level 1 and 2 recognition in 2021, becoming the first AFHS-designated telemedicine clinic in the nation. An interprofessional team and older Veterans guided planning and implementation. Using existing staff and clinic workflows, we consistently addressed the Geriatric 4Ms during visits. Specific metrics include: (1) AFHS Level 1 and 2 recognition, (2) maintenance in addressing Geriatric 4Ms in tele-Palliative Care, (3) number of patients served, (4) travel-miles saved. FY23-24, we conducted 192 AFHS tele-Palliative Care visits, 81% with rural/highly rural Veterans. We served 108 unique patients (FY23:57; FY24:51; percent decrease = 10.5%). Compared to Colorado's Veteran population, Veterans from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds and women were underrepresented; older Veterans were overrepresented. In FY23/FY24, the majority of patients were White (82%/73%), not Hispanic/Latino (83%/73%), male (100%/98%), and ≥65 (90%/89%). All 4Ms were addressed for 86% (FY23) and 76% (FY24) of unique patients. AFHS tele-Palliative Care saved Veterans/caregivers 23 622 (FY23) and 18 632 (FY24) miles of travel. Congruent with AFHS, Palliative Care focuses on physical, emotional, and psychosocial aspects of serious illness. AFHS designation in a tele-Palliative Care clinic is novel nationally. We demonstrated that evidence-based care can be provided to every older adult, regardless of care modality, without expanding staff or changing clinical workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251352727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254538/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-29DOI: 10.1177/00469580251399374
Hisba Shereefdeen, Abhinand Thaivalappil, Ian Young, Melissa MacKay
Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) tools are transforming workflows, with growing interest in their potential applications in qualitative research. While the use of genAI in facilitating the systematic review process has been explored, its application in the quality appraisal of qualitative research remains to be understood. This pilot study aims to evaluate the degree to which ChatGPT appraises qualitative research using popular appraisal tools compared to human assessments. Two reviewers applied the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for qualitative research to studies identified through a previously published review (n = 21). Next, iteratively developed prompts along with a copy of each study were uploaded to ChatGPT to instruct it to appraise each article. Interrater reliability measures and crude agreements were conducted to estimate the level of agreement between human and genAI assessments. Interrater reliability assessments between human and ChatGPT (GPT-5) revealed no agreement to moderate agreement for CASP checklist items (kappa: <.00-.46; crude agreement: 23.8%-100%) and from none to substantial for JBI items (kappa: <.00-.83; crude agreement: 4.8%-95.2%). Agreement was highest for reporting-based elements such as study aims, ethics approval, value of research (CASP), and participant voices and conclusions (JBI). Disagreements were greatest for interpretive and context-dependent items such as research design, researcher-participant relationships, and worldview-methodology congruity. Findings demonstrate that ChatGPT (GPT-5) can reliably identify objective components yet performs inconsistently when assessing items requiring nuance and contextual understanding across both checklists. Currently, any adoption of genAI for quality appraisal of qualitative research must be carefully applied only alongside human assessments and uphold principles of transparency and data privacy.
{"title":"A Pilot Study on Generative Artificial Intelligence's Reliability in Qualitative Research Quality Appraisal Using CASP and JBI Checklists.","authors":"Hisba Shereefdeen, Abhinand Thaivalappil, Ian Young, Melissa MacKay","doi":"10.1177/00469580251399374","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251399374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) tools are transforming workflows, with growing interest in their potential applications in qualitative research. While the use of genAI in facilitating the systematic review process has been explored, its application in the quality appraisal of qualitative research remains to be understood. This pilot study aims to evaluate the degree to which ChatGPT appraises qualitative research using popular appraisal tools compared to human assessments. Two reviewers applied the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for qualitative research to studies identified through a previously published review (n = 21). Next, iteratively developed prompts along with a copy of each study were uploaded to ChatGPT to instruct it to appraise each article. Interrater reliability measures and crude agreements were conducted to estimate the level of agreement between human and genAI assessments. Interrater reliability assessments between human and ChatGPT (GPT-5) revealed no agreement to moderate agreement for CASP checklist items (kappa: <.00-.46; crude agreement: 23.8%-100%) and from none to substantial for JBI items (kappa: <.00-.83; crude agreement: 4.8%-95.2%). Agreement was highest for reporting-based elements such as study aims, ethics approval, value of research (CASP), and participant voices and conclusions (JBI). Disagreements were greatest for interpretive and context-dependent items such as research design, researcher-participant relationships, and worldview-methodology congruity. Findings demonstrate that ChatGPT (GPT-5) can reliably identify objective components yet performs inconsistently when assessing items requiring nuance and contextual understanding across both checklists. Currently, any adoption of genAI for quality appraisal of qualitative research must be carefully applied only alongside human assessments and uphold principles of transparency and data privacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251399374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12665031/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-10DOI: 10.1177/00469580251399375
Shiu-Wan Hung, Chi-Yun Chiu, Wen-Min Lu
Healthcare Value Chains (HVCs) describe the full production flow from resource input to service delivery. However, existing literature lacks a clear analytical mechanism to evaluate how Digital Health (DH) transforms these stages. This gap may lead to the misconception that any DH investment automatically enhances efficiency, overlooking the strategic pathways through which DH affects performance. To address this issue, this study proposes a 3-stage production process evaluation framework encompassing Managerial Efficiency, Technical Efficiency and Economic Efficiency to systematically assess the impact of DH on HVCs. Using longitudinal data from 38 Taiwanese hospitals between 2015 and 2021, a non-oriented 3-stage Slack-Based Measure Data Envelopment Analysis (SBM-DEA) model and a Benchmarking Matrix were employed to capture efficiency variations and identify best-performing institutions. The analysis reveals that alliance hospitals with fragmented DH systems underperform, often lagging behind stand-alone hospitals due to insufficient system integration. Conversely, specialised hospitals demonstrate superior Managerial and Technical Efficiency, reflecting the advantages of operational focus and streamlined workflows. The Benchmarking Matrix effectively identifies optimal reference groups, providing actionable insights for alliance hospitals to enhance coordination and functional alignment. This study advances HVC theory by establishing a structured analytical model that elucidates the multi-dimensional effects of DH on healthcare performance. The proposed framework not only clarifies the mechanisms linking DH adoption to efficiency improvement but also offers strategic guidance for enhancing resource utilisation and value creation within healthcare systems.
{"title":"Dynamic Linkages Between Digital Health and Healthcare Value Chains: Evidence From a 3-Stage Network DEA Model.","authors":"Shiu-Wan Hung, Chi-Yun Chiu, Wen-Min Lu","doi":"10.1177/00469580251399375","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251399375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare Value Chains (HVCs) describe the full production flow from resource input to service delivery. However, existing literature lacks a clear analytical mechanism to evaluate how Digital Health (DH) transforms these stages. This gap may lead to the misconception that any DH investment automatically enhances efficiency, overlooking the strategic pathways through which DH affects performance. To address this issue, this study proposes a 3-stage production process evaluation framework encompassing Managerial Efficiency, Technical Efficiency and Economic Efficiency to systematically assess the impact of DH on HVCs. Using longitudinal data from 38 Taiwanese hospitals between 2015 and 2021, a non-oriented 3-stage Slack-Based Measure Data Envelopment Analysis (SBM-DEA) model and a Benchmarking Matrix were employed to capture efficiency variations and identify best-performing institutions. The analysis reveals that alliance hospitals with fragmented DH systems underperform, often lagging behind stand-alone hospitals due to insufficient system integration. Conversely, specialised hospitals demonstrate superior Managerial and Technical Efficiency, reflecting the advantages of operational focus and streamlined workflows. The Benchmarking Matrix effectively identifies optimal reference groups, providing actionable insights for alliance hospitals to enhance coordination and functional alignment. This study advances HVC theory by establishing a structured analytical model that elucidates the multi-dimensional effects of DH on healthcare performance. The proposed framework not only clarifies the mechanisms linking DH adoption to efficiency improvement but also offers strategic guidance for enhancing resource utilisation and value creation within healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251399375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12698998/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145727271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-25DOI: 10.1177/00469580251381991
Leila Wood, Elizabeth Baumler, Rachel J Voth Schrag, Aly Kramer Jacobs, Jeff R Temple, Erin Clark
Community organizations strive to help survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV), stalking, sexual assault and human trafficking address health and safety needs. Hotline, offered by local agencies, is the first line of support for survivors to address needs. Increasingly, hotline is offered in digital formats (chat and text) to meet the emergent needs of survivors. Despite the growing use of digital hotline, little is known about short-term health and safety changes associated with use. Partnering with 2 local agencies in a Southern state, we recruited first-time digital hotline participants to an online baseline and follow-up (6 weeks later) assessment (n = 237) to examine changes in health (e.g. physical health, depression, PTSD) and safety (tools related to safety, perception of safety). Descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, chi-square, and regression modeling were used for data analysis. At 6 weeks post-digital hotline use, depression and PTSD symptoms had significantly decreased, and hope and feelings of safety had significantly increased. No changes were observed for physical health. Repeated hotline use after baseline was associated with revictimization, sustained health needs, and reduced perception of internal tools related to safety. Longer-term and expanded study are needed of digital hotline to further examine potential impacts, however these findings suggest that hotline is not merely a conduit to other services, but a potentially impactful intervention into itself.
{"title":"Short-Term Health and Safety Outcomes Associated With Digital Hotline Use at Interpersonal Violence-Focused Agencies.","authors":"Leila Wood, Elizabeth Baumler, Rachel J Voth Schrag, Aly Kramer Jacobs, Jeff R Temple, Erin Clark","doi":"10.1177/00469580251381991","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251381991","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community organizations strive to help survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV), stalking, sexual assault and human trafficking address health and safety needs. Hotline, offered by local agencies, is the first line of support for survivors to address needs. Increasingly, hotline is offered in digital formats (chat and text) to meet the emergent needs of survivors. Despite the growing use of digital hotline, little is known about short-term health and safety changes associated with use. Partnering with 2 local agencies in a Southern state, we recruited first-time digital hotline participants to an online baseline and follow-up (6 weeks later) assessment (n = 237) to examine changes in health (e.g. physical health, depression, PTSD) and safety (tools related to safety, perception of safety). Descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, chi-square, and regression modeling were used for data analysis. At 6 weeks post-digital hotline use, depression and PTSD symptoms had significantly decreased, and hope and feelings of safety had significantly increased. No changes were observed for physical health. Repeated hotline use after baseline was associated with revictimization, sustained health needs, and reduced perception of internal tools related to safety. Longer-term and expanded study are needed of digital hotline to further examine potential impacts, however these findings suggest that hotline is not merely a conduit to other services, but a potentially impactful intervention into itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251381991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12572614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145369062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-18DOI: 10.1177/00469580251381969
Magoma Mwancha-Kwasa, Brenda Onyancha, Agnes Wambui Karita, Gerald Kwoba Mang'eni, Emily Ngonyo Muiruri, Hillary Kagwa, Patrick Nyaga, Janefer Maina Kinyanjui, Mike Mulongo, Lizah Nyawira, Prabhjot Kaur Juttla, Moses Ndiritu, Ryan Nyotu Gitau
Isolation facilities are essential to pandemic response, yet the economic trade-offs of repurposing existing hospitals remain poorly characterised. This study quantifies both the operational costs and the revenue foregone from converting Tigoni Level 4 Hospital (TL4H) into Kiambu County's sole COVID-19 isolation centre. Our study focused on estimating recurrent and labour costs, considering only capital costs incurred during the study period. We conducted a cost analysis at the facility level, assessing all expenditures incurred by TL4H between June 2020 and February 2022, using an activity-based costing approach to allocate costs to specific operational activities. Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and 10,000-draw Monte Carlo PSA, estimated uncertainty in total and per-patient costs. The total operational cost of the isolation centre over the 21 months was KES 489,220,113.98 (USD 4,181,011.14). This translates to an annual operating cost of KES 279,554,350.85 (USD 2,389,149.23). The average cost of managing one COVID-19 patient regardless of severity was estimated as KES 337,626.03 (USD 2885.45). The revenue foregone by waiving user fees for COVID-19 patients was KES 160,678,901.00 (USD 1,374,236). Sensitivity analysis indicated that HRH costs (78.9% of total expenditure) had the largest influence: a ±20% change shifted total costs by ±KES 77.6 million (USD 663,191.18). PSA results showed a mean total operational cost of KES 489,212,852 (USD 4,180,949.08; 95% UI: 414,803,680-573,687,849), and a mean cost per patient of KES 337,621.02 (USD 2885.40; 95% UI: 286,268.93-395,919.84). Repurposing TL4H as a COVID-19 isolation centre was resource-intensive, highlighting the importance of strategic budget planning and resource allocation for future preparedness.
{"title":"Operational Costs and Revenue Dynamics of Repurposing a Public Hospital into a COVID-19 Isolation Centre in Kenya: A Facility-Based Case Study.","authors":"Magoma Mwancha-Kwasa, Brenda Onyancha, Agnes Wambui Karita, Gerald Kwoba Mang'eni, Emily Ngonyo Muiruri, Hillary Kagwa, Patrick Nyaga, Janefer Maina Kinyanjui, Mike Mulongo, Lizah Nyawira, Prabhjot Kaur Juttla, Moses Ndiritu, Ryan Nyotu Gitau","doi":"10.1177/00469580251381969","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00469580251381969","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Isolation facilities are essential to pandemic response, yet the economic trade-offs of repurposing existing hospitals remain poorly characterised. This study quantifies both the operational costs and the revenue foregone from converting Tigoni Level 4 Hospital (TL4H) into Kiambu County's sole COVID-19 isolation centre. Our study focused on estimating recurrent and labour costs, considering only capital costs incurred during the study period. We conducted a cost analysis at the facility level, assessing all expenditures incurred by TL4H between June 2020 and February 2022, using an activity-based costing approach to allocate costs to specific operational activities. Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and 10,000-draw Monte Carlo PSA, estimated uncertainty in total and per-patient costs. The total operational cost of the isolation centre over the 21 months was KES 489,220,113.98 (USD 4,181,011.14). This translates to an annual operating cost of KES 279,554,350.85 (USD 2,389,149.23). The average cost of managing one COVID-19 patient regardless of severity was estimated as KES 337,626.03 (USD 2885.45). The revenue foregone by waiving user fees for COVID-19 patients was KES 160,678,901.00 (USD 1,374,236). Sensitivity analysis indicated that HRH costs (78.9% of total expenditure) had the largest influence: a ±20% change shifted total costs by ±KES 77.6 million (USD 663,191.18). PSA results showed a mean total operational cost of KES 489,212,852 (USD 4,180,949.08; 95% UI: 414,803,680-573,687,849), and a mean cost per patient of KES 337,621.02 (USD 2885.40; 95% UI: 286,268.93-395,919.84). Repurposing TL4H as a COVID-19 isolation centre was resource-intensive, highlighting the importance of strategic budget planning and resource allocation for future preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251381969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12547125/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}