Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105177
Ines Marina Niehaus , Andreas Lehr , André Kaiser , Helena Sophie Müller , Ludwig Kuntz
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries applied centralization strategies to the distribution of power between national government and regional/local governments over responsibility for regulatory tasks. As a result, health-policy decision-making competences were shifted from the regional level to the national level (vertical shift of decision-making competences). This centralization trend for the purpose of infection control is evident in Germany. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of health-policy regulatory measures (March 2018 to March 2020) in order to investigate whether the vertical shift in decision-making competences was already a trend in Germany before the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond infection control. Our results show that the centralization strategy observed during COVID-19 does not continue a trend. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, what was most important was the distribution of power at national level between government and non-government institutions (horizontal allocation of decision-making competences). This long-term trend strengthens the decision-making competences of government institutions and weakens non-government institutions.
{"title":"German centralization strategy during COVID-19: Continuing or interrupting a trend?","authors":"Ines Marina Niehaus , Andreas Lehr , André Kaiser , Helena Sophie Müller , Ludwig Kuntz","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105177","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105177","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries applied centralization strategies to the distribution of power between national government and regional/local governments over responsibility for regulatory tasks. As a result, health-policy decision-making competences were shifted from the regional level to the national level (vertical shift of decision-making competences). This centralization trend for the purpose of infection control is evident in Germany. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of health-policy regulatory measures (March 2018 to March 2020) in order to investigate whether the vertical shift in decision-making competences was already a trend in Germany before the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond infection control. Our results show that the centralization strategy observed during COVID-19 does not continue a trend. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, what was most important was the distribution of power at national level between government and non-government institutions (horizontal allocation of decision-making competences). This long-term trend strengthens the decision-making competences of government institutions and weakens non-government institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-06DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105179
Miguel Viegas , João Valente dos Santos , Manuel João Coelho e Silva
According to the World Health Organization, 17 million people die every year of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), particularly heart attacks and strokes. More than half of all deaths across the Europe are caused by CVDs. 80 % of premature deaths from these causes could be avoided by controlling the main risk factors: tobacco, unhealthy diet and physical inactivity.
Local authorities provide sport and recreation facilities to their communities. They also have a central role in forging partnerships with public and private sector to enhance the local sport delivery system.
The present paper consists of an empirical exercise about the statistical relationship between the financial effort of Portuguese municipalities in the implementation of sports policies and the prevalence of CVDs. The estimation of a Spatial Autocorrelation Model confirms the strong spatial dependence between neighbouring municipalities and validates the existence of a positive impact of local sports policies on mortality rate from cardiovascular diseases. The results raise the need to reinforce local policies to promote active living based on holistic approaches to combating heart disease and promoting healthy lifestyles in partnerships with health professionals, educators, and community leaders.
{"title":"Impact of local sports policies in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease: An assessment with spatial data analysis","authors":"Miguel Viegas , João Valente dos Santos , Manuel João Coelho e Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105179","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105179","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>According to the World Health Organization, 17 million people die every year of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), particularly heart attacks and strokes. More than half of all deaths across the Europe are caused by CVDs. 80 % of premature deaths from these causes could be avoided by controlling the main risk factors: tobacco, unhealthy diet and physical inactivity.</div><div>Local authorities provide sport and recreation facilities to their communities. They also have a central role in forging partnerships with public and private sector to enhance the local sport delivery system.</div><div>The present paper consists of an empirical exercise about the statistical relationship between the financial effort of Portuguese municipalities in the implementation of sports policies and the prevalence of CVDs. The estimation of a Spatial Autocorrelation Model confirms the strong spatial dependence between neighbouring municipalities and validates the existence of a positive impact of local sports policies on mortality rate from cardiovascular diseases. The results raise the need to reinforce local policies to promote active living based on holistic approaches to combating heart disease and promoting healthy lifestyles in partnerships with health professionals, educators, and community leaders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142442278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105174
Christina Mensger , Yang Jiao , Maximiliane Jansky , Christian Banse , Friedemann Nauck , Monika Nothacker , Henrikje Stanze
Background
Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is a way to end one's life prematurely. We synthesized the empirical data on VSED.
Methods
In this systematic mixed-methods review, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and BELIT for English and German articles published between January 1, 2013 and November 12, 2021. We included quantitative and qualitative research examining the experiences, attitudes, and knowledge of people confronted with VSED. We inductively analyzed the data after quantitative data transformation. We assessed quality and confidence using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool and GRADE-CERQual approach, respectively. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022283743).
Findings
We identified 22 eligible articles, comprising 16 studies. The participants were healthcare professionals and relatives, but not individuals undertaking VSED. We present here our findings on the challenges of accompanying VSED, positive experiences with VSED, and the identified needs. Support during VSED is needed at multiple levels (medical care, family relief, course planning), and the willingness to accompany VSED is very high among healthcare professionals. However, there are several problems, the most obvious being the lack of knowledge and expertise regarding VSED, placing a great burden on families and professionals. The confidence in the review findings ranged from moderate to low.
Interpretation
Evidence-based guidance, in-depth knowledge, and training of healthcare professionals can greatly reduce the burden and fear among individuals accompanying VSED.
{"title":"Voluntarily stopping eating and drinking (VSED): A systematic mixed-methods review focusing on the carers’ experiences","authors":"Christina Mensger , Yang Jiao , Maximiliane Jansky , Christian Banse , Friedemann Nauck , Monika Nothacker , Henrikje Stanze","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105174","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105174","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is a way to end one's life prematurely. We synthesized the empirical data on VSED.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this systematic mixed-methods review, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and BELIT for English and German articles published between January 1, 2013 and November 12, 2021. We included quantitative and qualitative research examining the experiences, attitudes, and knowledge of people confronted with VSED. We inductively analyzed the data after quantitative data transformation. We assessed quality and confidence using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool and GRADE-CERQual approach, respectively. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022283743).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We identified 22 eligible articles, comprising 16 studies. The participants were healthcare professionals and relatives, but not individuals undertaking VSED. We present here our findings on the challenges of accompanying VSED, positive experiences with VSED, and the identified needs. Support during VSED is needed at multiple levels (medical care, family relief, course planning), and the willingness to accompany VSED is very high among healthcare professionals. However, there are several problems, the most obvious being the lack of knowledge and expertise regarding VSED, placing a great burden on families and professionals. The confidence in the review findings ranged from moderate to low.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Evidence-based guidance, in-depth knowledge, and training of healthcare professionals can greatly reduce the burden and fear among individuals accompanying VSED.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105168
Nikita Jacob, Rita Santos, Peter Sivey
During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital emergency departments worldwide experienced a pronounced fall in utilisation of emergency care, with a decrease of up to 40% in many countries. Evidence suggests the cause of these changes include both population fear of COVID-19 and the effects of lockdowns and the interaction of these two effects. We analyse a sub-sample of national data on Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances in England over an extended period from April 2019 to March 2022 for different patient groups, including by age, mental/physical health status, acuity, and common clinical groupings. Our results showed that all patient groups experienced substantial declines in attendances during the first two waves of the pandemic, including high acuity and cardiovascular patients. Mental health patients were the only exception, with a smaller decline in attendances. Our findings suggest that policymakers should recognise the potential harmful effects of lockdowns, public messaging, and changes in health care provision on all patients during health emergencies.
{"title":"The long-run effect of COVID-19 on hospital emergency department attendances:evidence from statistical analysis of hospital data from England","authors":"Nikita Jacob, Rita Santos, Peter Sivey","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105168","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105168","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital emergency departments worldwide experienced a pronounced fall in utilisation of emergency care, with a decrease of up to 40% in many countries. Evidence suggests the cause of these changes include both population fear of COVID-19 and the effects of lockdowns and the interaction of these two effects. We analyse a sub-sample of national data on Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances in England over an extended period from April 2019 to March 2022 for different patient groups, including by age, mental/physical health status, acuity, and common clinical groupings. Our results showed that all patient groups experienced substantial declines in attendances during the first two waves of the pandemic, including high acuity and cardiovascular patients. Mental health patients were the only exception, with a smaller decline in attendances. Our findings suggest that policymakers should recognise the potential harmful effects of lockdowns, public messaging, and changes in health care provision on all patients during health emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142434411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
General practitioners (GPs) face quantitative and qualitative changes in patient demand and doctor shortages.
Objectives
To investigate how GPs cope with doctor shortage issues.
Materials and methods
Two cross-sectional surveys of a representative panel of 1530 GPs in 2019 and 2022 about their perceptions of physician shortages, working hours worked (WHW), and adaptive behaviors. Hierarchical clustering enabled identification of profiles with different adaptation patterns. Multiple Poisson or logistic regression models studied associations between GPs’ profiles and professional characteristics.
Results
87.4 % of GPs applied at least one adaptation to control patients’ healthcare demand. 24 % adopted task-shifting while their average WHW decreased by 3.6 h between 2019 and 2022. Four GP profiles were identified. “Low adapters/low workload” and “Low adapters/high workload” (25 % of the sample each) reported 2.4 adaptive measures: 75.5 % refused to be new patients' preferred doctor in the former group (vs 5.1 %). “High adapters/unchanged consultations” (30.7 %) and “High adapters/shortened consultations” (18.9 %) reported 4.8 and 6.1 adaptations, respectively. They were more likely to practice in medically underserved areas.
Conclusion
These results call into question GPs’ gatekeeper role in the French healthcare system. Moreover, the marked reduction in WHW in underserved areas is likely to exacerbate their uneven distribution nationwide. Encouraging vertical integration between HCPs while enhancing cooperation and task-shifting is probably a pathway toward improving the relative GP shortage.
{"title":"How general practitioners in France are coping with increased healthcare demand and physician shortages. A panel data survey and hierarchical clustering","authors":"Bérengère Davin-Casalena , Dimitri Scronias , Yann Videau , Pierre Verger","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105175","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105175","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>General practitioners (GPs) face quantitative and qualitative changes in patient demand and doctor shortages.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate how GPs cope with doctor shortage issues.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Two cross-sectional surveys of a representative panel of 1530 GPs in 2019 and 2022 about their perceptions of physician shortages, working hours worked (WHW), and adaptive behaviors. Hierarchical clustering enabled identification of profiles with different adaptation patterns. Multiple Poisson or logistic regression models studied associations between GPs’ profiles and professional characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>87.4 % of GPs applied at least one adaptation to control patients’ healthcare demand. 24 % adopted task-shifting while their average WHW decreased by 3.6 h between 2019 and 2022. Four GP profiles were identified. “Low adapters/low workload” and “Low adapters/high workload” (25 % of the sample each) reported 2.4 adaptive measures: 75.5 % refused to be new patients' preferred doctor in the former group (vs 5.1 %). “High adapters/unchanged consultations” (30.7 %) and “High adapters/shortened consultations” (18.9 %) reported 4.8 and 6.1 adaptations, respectively. They were more likely to practice in medically underserved areas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These results call into question GPs’ gatekeeper role in the French healthcare system. Moreover, the marked reduction in WHW in underserved areas is likely to exacerbate their uneven distribution nationwide. Encouraging vertical integration between HCPs while enhancing cooperation and task-shifting is probably a pathway toward improving the relative GP shortage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study explores the marketization of healthcare through a stage model analysis, focusing on Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). By employing mixed methods, including sentiment and frequency analysis as well as qualitative content analysis of policy documents and media coverage, we trace the NDIS's evolution and the interplay of competing social welfare and market logics over time. Our findings underline that the evolution and interplay between competing institutional logics follow a stage model of institutional change, detailing pre-emergence, orientation, contestation, consolidation, and normalization phases. Additionally, we observe a shift in dominant institutional logics across different stages, demonstrating the critical role of media and public sentiment in shaping discourse about the marketization of care, which intertwines with policy decision-making. Our findings emphasize the importance of adaptive engagement and communication strategies by policymakers to avoid marginalizing vulnerable groups as institutional logics evolve, especially in the latter stages of the process when a dominant logic has emerged. The study highlights the complex dynamics of institutional change and offers insights for both researchers and practitioners in the healthcare sector, shedding light on the coevolution of competing logics in the policy development and implementation process.
{"title":"Understanding the evolution of competing institutional logics in the marketization of care: A stage model analysis of Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme","authors":"Fanny Salignac , Ralf Barkemeyer , Elizabeth Franklin-Johnson , Tulin Dzhengiz","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105173","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105173","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the marketization of healthcare through a stage model analysis, focusing on Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). By employing mixed methods, including sentiment and frequency analysis as well as qualitative content analysis of policy documents and media coverage, we trace the NDIS's evolution and the interplay of competing social welfare and market logics over time. Our findings underline that the evolution and interplay between competing institutional logics follow a stage model of institutional change, detailing pre-emergence, orientation, contestation, consolidation, and normalization phases. Additionally, we observe a shift in dominant institutional logics across different stages, demonstrating the critical role of media and public sentiment in shaping discourse about the marketization of care, which intertwines with policy decision-making. Our findings emphasize the importance of adaptive engagement and communication strategies by policymakers to avoid marginalizing vulnerable groups as institutional logics evolve, especially in the latter stages of the process when a dominant logic has emerged. The study highlights the complex dynamics of institutional change and offers insights for both researchers and practitioners in the healthcare sector, shedding light on the coevolution of competing logics in the policy development and implementation process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105176
Jean Pierre Uwitonze , Lize Duminy , Carl Rudolf Blankart
Ageism in healthcare has received increased attention in recent years, but literature focusing on how it affects individuals living with rare diseases remains scant. The rare disease population already faces obstacles when navigating health systems, and ageism has the potential to exacerbate existing health inequities. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on health inequities in rare disease populations, seeking to identify publications that reported primary or secondary data on the equitable or inequitable treatment of these populations, or that discussed related regulatory, moral, or philosophical issues. Our aims were to understand how health inequities in these populations arise, how they are justified from societal points of view, how they manifest themselves in laws and regulations, and what effects they have on health care access and health outcomes. We retrieved information from 63 publications, which we inductively synthesized into five categories: ethical discussions, societal preferences, regulations, access to care, and health outcomes. Integrating insights from these categories, we developed an Ethical Spectrum and Resource Allocation Framework, which explains the emergence of equity issues and how they are manifested in health systems. By providing a better understanding of the root causes of health inequities, particularly among older adults, the framework can inform health policymaking, improving access to care and health outcomes for rare disease patients.
{"title":"Identifying health inequities faced by older adults with rare diseases: A systematic literature review and proposal for an ethical spectrum and resource allocation framework","authors":"Jean Pierre Uwitonze , Lize Duminy , Carl Rudolf Blankart","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105176","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105176","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ageism in healthcare has received increased attention in recent years, but literature focusing on how it affects individuals living with rare diseases remains scant. The rare disease population already faces obstacles when navigating health systems, and ageism has the potential to exacerbate existing health inequities. We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on health inequities in rare disease populations, seeking to identify publications that reported primary or secondary data on the equitable or inequitable treatment of these populations, or that discussed related regulatory, moral, or philosophical issues. Our aims were to understand how health inequities in these populations arise, how they are justified from societal points of view, how they manifest themselves in laws and regulations, and what effects they have on health care access and health outcomes. We retrieved information from 63 publications, which we inductively synthesized into five categories: ethical discussions, societal preferences, regulations, access to care, and health outcomes. Integrating insights from these categories, we developed an <em>Ethical Spectrum and Resource Allocation Framework</em>, which explains the emergence of equity issues and how they are manifested in health systems. By providing a better understanding of the root causes of health inequities, particularly among older adults, the framework can inform health policymaking, improving access to care and health outcomes for rare disease patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105170
Keren Semyonov-Tal
Hospital rules and regulations can contribute to standardizing care, streamlining processes, and improving the quality of care. Over the past decade, hospitals in Israel have introduced written rules and regulations for staff that provide guidance on quality control, patient safety, and the patient-provider relationship. This study aimed to explore how these written guidelines, when implemented, can promote responsive care for inpatients. Using a thematic analysis, the study analyzed the content of staff guidelines from six Israeli hospitals. The analysis found that hospital rules and regulations provide similar, relatively precise instructions with regard to improving the responsiveness to and dignity of care of patients. The guidelines address three essential aspects of responsiveness - disclosing medical information and respecting the patients’ autonomy and physical space. The guidelines highlight that healthcare providers should implement security measures to safeguard medical information, respect patients' autonomy, involve patients in decision-making, and provide adequate physical space to maintain their privacy and modesty. The guidelines contribute to ensuring patients’ legal and ethical rights. Policymakers should consider introducing and implementing the dimensions of responsiveness that were stressed by Israeli hospitals' rules and regulations. Further research is needed to confirm the relevance of the various rules and regulations for improving the quality of care provided to patients.
{"title":"Responsive patient care in Israel: A qualitative study of hospital rules and regulations","authors":"Keren Semyonov-Tal","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105170","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105170","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hospital rules and regulations can contribute to standardizing care, streamlining processes, and improving the quality of care. Over the past decade, hospitals in Israel have introduced written rules and regulations for staff that provide guidance on quality control, patient safety, and the patient-provider relationship. This study aimed to explore how these written guidelines, when implemented, can promote responsive care for inpatients. Using a thematic analysis, the study analyzed the content of staff guidelines from six Israeli hospitals. The analysis found that hospital rules and regulations provide similar, relatively precise instructions with regard to improving the responsiveness to and dignity of care of patients. The guidelines address three essential aspects of responsiveness - disclosing medical information and respecting the patients’ autonomy and physical space. The guidelines highlight that healthcare providers should implement security measures to safeguard medical information, respect patients' autonomy, involve patients in decision-making, and provide adequate physical space to maintain their privacy and modesty. The guidelines contribute to ensuring patients’ legal and ethical rights. Policymakers should consider introducing and implementing the dimensions of responsiveness that were stressed by Israeli hospitals' rules and regulations. Further research is needed to confirm the relevance of the various rules and regulations for improving the quality of care provided to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142376340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105171
Yuxi Wang , Aleksandra Torbica
Examining the causal nexus between health services and gender equality is of paramount significance in policy formulation and academic inquiry. This paper concentrates on maternal, sexual, and reproductive health, offering a critical narrative review of empirical research exploring the causal relationship between enhanced women's health, stemming from either overall healthcare amelioration or specific interventions, and broader gender equality objectives. A conceptual framework is devised to elucidate the causal pathways between health and gender equality across various dimensions. The final review encompasses 30 empirical papers, revealing both direct and indirect effects of improved maternal, reproductive, and sexual health outcomes on labour participation and educational investment, with fertility decisions and autonomy serving as primary intermediary factors. Evidence predominantly indicates that interventions like contraception, family planning, and abortion policies yield enduring effects beyond health, influencing reproductive choices. Specific medical procedures, such as caesarean deliveries and sterilization, also impact fertility and labour market outcomes. Furthermore, public healthcare infrastructure contributes to combating gender-based violence by facilitating incident reporting and access to protection. Recognizing, documenting, and monitoring these co-benefits arising from improved women's health are pivotal for delineating future health sector priorities and advancing the global gender equality and sustainable development agenda.
{"title":"Investigating the relationship between health and gender equality: What role do maternal, reproductive, and sexual health services play?","authors":"Yuxi Wang , Aleksandra Torbica","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105171","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105171","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Examining the causal nexus between health services and gender equality is of paramount significance in policy formulation and academic inquiry. This paper concentrates on maternal, sexual, and reproductive health, offering a critical narrative review of empirical research exploring the causal relationship between enhanced women's health, stemming from either overall healthcare amelioration or specific interventions, and broader gender equality objectives. A conceptual framework is devised to elucidate the causal pathways between health and gender equality across various dimensions. The final review encompasses 30 empirical papers, revealing both direct and indirect effects of improved maternal, reproductive, and sexual health outcomes on labour participation and educational investment, with fertility decisions and autonomy serving as primary intermediary factors. Evidence predominantly indicates that interventions like contraception, family planning, and abortion policies yield enduring effects beyond health, influencing reproductive choices. Specific medical procedures, such as caesarean deliveries and sterilization, also impact fertility and labour market outcomes. Furthermore, public healthcare infrastructure contributes to combating gender-based violence by facilitating incident reporting and access to protection. Recognizing, documenting, and monitoring these co-benefits arising from improved women's health are pivotal for delineating future health sector priorities and advancing the global gender equality and sustainable development agenda.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105172
Sydney Campbell , Alexandra Cernat , Avram Denburg , Fiona Moola , Jeremy Petch , Jennifer Gibson
Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) was decriminalized in Canada in 2016 for individuals 18 years or older who met eligibility criteria. Currently, individuals younger than 18 years are legally permitted to access an assisted death in the Netherlands and Belgium, but not in Canada. To-date, no work has compared factors shaping the policy processes and outcomes in these three countries. Therefore, our objective was to explore the legalities of assisted dying for minors in the Netherlands and Belgium, along with how each jurisdiction arrived at their respective policies and why the trajectory differed in Canada. After screening and compiling peer-reviewed and grey literature, we used Yanow's interpretive method for comparative work to review included materials. We framed findings using Hajer's discourse coalition theory. The Dutch and Belgian contexts relied upon a parliamentary approach in legalizing assisted dying for mature minors that emphasized suffering, whereas Canada's approach was initiated by a Supreme Court of Canada decision and emphasized human rights. While the Netherlands and Belgium viewed mature minors as capable to make decisions about assisted dying, the Canadian position on mature minors’ decisional capacity with respect to assisted dying remains unsettled. This work contributes to understanding how context and sociopolitical values shape assisted dying legislations and treatment of mature minors, while highlighting areas requiring further study amid ongoing debate in Canada.
{"title":"Exploring assisted dying policies for mature minors: A cross jurisdiction comparison of the Netherlands, Belgium & Canada","authors":"Sydney Campbell , Alexandra Cernat , Avram Denburg , Fiona Moola , Jeremy Petch , Jennifer Gibson","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105172","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105172","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) was decriminalized in Canada in 2016 for individuals 18 years or older who met eligibility criteria. Currently, individuals younger than 18 years are legally permitted to access an assisted death in the Netherlands and Belgium, but not in Canada. To-date, no work has compared factors shaping the policy processes and outcomes in these three countries. Therefore, our objective was to explore the legalities of assisted dying for minors in the Netherlands and Belgium, along with how each jurisdiction arrived at their respective policies and why the trajectory differed in Canada. After screening and compiling peer-reviewed and grey literature, we used Yanow's interpretive method for comparative work to review included materials. We framed findings using Hajer's discourse coalition theory. The Dutch and Belgian contexts relied upon a parliamentary approach in legalizing assisted dying for mature minors that emphasized suffering, whereas Canada's approach was initiated by a Supreme Court of Canada decision and emphasized human rights. While the Netherlands and Belgium viewed mature minors as capable to make decisions about assisted dying, the Canadian position on mature minors’ decisional capacity with respect to assisted dying remains unsettled. This work contributes to understanding how context and sociopolitical values shape assisted dying legislations and treatment of mature minors, while highlighting areas requiring further study amid ongoing debate in Canada.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 105172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142332745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号