首页 > 最新文献

Health Expectations最新文献

英文 中文
Developing the Patient Experience Assessment Questionnaire for Hospital Inpatient Care in South Korea 韩国医院住院护理患者体验评估问卷的编制。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70560
Yeongchae Song, Jung-Eun Kim, Bon Mi Koo, Young-Geun Choi, Un-Na Kim, Jin Yong Lee, Min-Woo Jo, Minsu Ock, Young Kyung Do
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Measuring patient experiences has become a key initiative for improving healthcare quality worldwide. Since patient experiences are inherently shaped by sociocultural context and healthcare system structures, developing locally relevant measurement tools is crucial for reflecting patients' needs and expectations. South Korea has developed a patient experience questionnaire for hospital inpatient care within its National Health Insurance system through a systematic process involving patient engagement. In outlining the development process of the questionnaire, this study assesses its psychometric properties, focusing on validity and reliability.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>The Patient Experience Assessment (PXA) questionnaire was developed through a three-phase process: (1) item generation via a literature review and qualitative research with patient and caregiver groups, (2) expert review using the Delphi method, and (3) validity and reliability testing through a pilot test. After stakeholder feedback, the current version of PXA includes 21 items across 6 domains. Psychometric properties were assessed using data from 629 inpatients in four general hospitals, split into two subsamples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to ensure robust construct validation. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>The PXA questionnaire includes globally recognised patient-centred themes while addressing unique issues that matter to patients in the Korean healthcare system. EFA identified a four-factor structure: (1) Information, dignity, and autonomy; (2) Communication with nurses; (3) Communication with doctors; and (4) Hospital environment. CFA confirmed this structure, demonstrating high convergent validity (standardised loadings > 0.70) and satisfactory model fit (CFI and TLI > 0.950, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.046). The instrument showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha: total = 0.95; subscales = 0.89–0.93).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>The PXA questionnaire, currently being implemented in South Korea, demonstrates robust psychometric properties. This work also exemplifies the process of developing a locally relevant patient experience questionnaire, grounded in global knowledge on patient-centred care.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3> <p>
背景:测量患者体验已成为提高全球医疗保健质量的关键举措。由于患者的经历本质上受社会文化背景和医疗保健系统结构的影响,因此开发与当地相关的测量工具对于反映患者的需求和期望至关重要。韩国通过一个涉及患者参与的系统过程,为其国民健康保险系统内的医院住院护理制定了一份患者体验问卷。在概述问卷的开发过程中,本研究评估了其心理测量特性,重点是效度和信度。方法:患者体验评估(PXA)问卷的编制分为三个阶段:(1)通过文献综述和对患者和护理人员群体的定性研究生成问卷项目;(2)采用德尔菲法进行专家评审;(3)通过先导测试进行效度和信度检验。在涉众反馈之后,PXA的当前版本包括6个领域的21个项目。采用来自四家综合医院的629名住院患者的数据对心理测量特性进行评估,并将其分为两个亚样本进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA),以确保稳健的结构验证。内部一致性采用Cronbach’s alpha评价。结果:PXA问卷包括全球公认的以患者为中心的主题,同时解决韩国医疗保健系统中对患者重要的独特问题。全民教育确定了一个四因素结构:(1)信息、尊严和自主性;(2)与护士的沟通;(3)与医生沟通;(4)医院环境。CFA证实了这一结构,显示出高的收敛效度(标准化加载> 0.70)和令人满意的模型拟合(CFI和TLI > 0.950, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.046)。该仪器具有良好的信度(Cronbach's alpha: total = 0.95; subscales = 0.89-0.93)。结论:目前在韩国实施的PXA问卷显示出强大的心理测量特性。这项工作还举例说明了在以患者为中心的护理的全球知识基础上,制定与当地相关的患者体验问卷的过程。患者或公众贡献:患者和护理人员在PXA开发期间参与焦点小组讨论。他们的意见直接影响了与韩国医疗保健系统相关的文化特定患者体验维度的确定。这些发现强调让目标患者群体参与开发与当地相关的患者体验工具。
{"title":"Developing the Patient Experience Assessment Questionnaire for Hospital Inpatient Care in South Korea","authors":"Yeongchae Song,&nbsp;Jung-Eun Kim,&nbsp;Bon Mi Koo,&nbsp;Young-Geun Choi,&nbsp;Un-Na Kim,&nbsp;Jin Yong Lee,&nbsp;Min-Woo Jo,&nbsp;Minsu Ock,&nbsp;Young Kyung Do","doi":"10.1111/hex.70560","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70560","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Measuring patient experiences has become a key initiative for improving healthcare quality worldwide. Since patient experiences are inherently shaped by sociocultural context and healthcare system structures, developing locally relevant measurement tools is crucial for reflecting patients' needs and expectations. South Korea has developed a patient experience questionnaire for hospital inpatient care within its National Health Insurance system through a systematic process involving patient engagement. In outlining the development process of the questionnaire, this study assesses its psychometric properties, focusing on validity and reliability.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The Patient Experience Assessment (PXA) questionnaire was developed through a three-phase process: (1) item generation via a literature review and qualitative research with patient and caregiver groups, (2) expert review using the Delphi method, and (3) validity and reliability testing through a pilot test. After stakeholder feedback, the current version of PXA includes 21 items across 6 domains. Psychometric properties were assessed using data from 629 inpatients in four general hospitals, split into two subsamples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to ensure robust construct validation. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The PXA questionnaire includes globally recognised patient-centred themes while addressing unique issues that matter to patients in the Korean healthcare system. EFA identified a four-factor structure: (1) Information, dignity, and autonomy; (2) Communication with nurses; (3) Communication with doctors; and (4) Hospital environment. CFA confirmed this structure, demonstrating high convergent validity (standardised loadings &gt; 0.70) and satisfactory model fit (CFI and TLI &gt; 0.950, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.046). The instrument showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha: total = 0.95; subscales = 0.89–0.93).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The PXA questionnaire, currently being implemented in South Korea, demonstrates robust psychometric properties. This work also exemplifies the process of developing a locally relevant patient experience questionnaire, grounded in global knowledge on patient-centred care.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Patient or Public Contribution&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12868926/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the Applicability of the SAFER-YCL Care Bundle for Transitions From CAMHS Crisis and Liaison Services: The Barriers and Enablers 调查SAFER-YCL护理包在CAMHS危机和联络服务过渡中的适用性:障碍和推动因素。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70579
James Roe, Neve Jones, Leonie Lewis, Natasha Tyler, Maria Panagioti, Sewanu Awhangansi, Nisha Balan, Nicola Wright, Richard Morriss, Kapil Sayal, Pallab Majumder, Josephine Holland
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Crisis and Liaison teams in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) offer intensive, short-term support to young people experiencing mental health crisis in the community (Crisis) or admitted to acute hospitals (Liaison). There is no evidence-based model for how these teams operate. The SAFER care bundle, designed to improve discharges from acute hospitals, has been adapted for use in mental health inpatient discharges for adults (SAFER-MH) and young people (SAFER-YMH). This study took a care bundle designed to improve discharges from CAMHS inpatient care (SAFER-YMH) and used stakeholder feedback to adapt it for use in CAMHS Crisis and Liaison teams.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Design</h3> <p>Focus groups were carried out with healthcare professionals (HCPs), young people and parents/carers to present the SAFER care bundle and discuss necessary adaptations for use in CAMHS Crisis and Liaison teams. Analysis of transcripts followed a Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) framework to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and necessary adaptations.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Participants expressed that integrating the SAFER-YCL care bundle into the electronic patient record, automatically pulling information from other forms, and providing a template for discharge letters and safety plans could serve as an aide-memoire and potentially replace current discharge documents. It would need to avoid increasing documentation burden for staff and have flexibility to be administered by different staff members and at an appropriate time.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>The SAFER-YCL care bundle has been successfully developed for implementation in CAMHS Crisis and Liaison services, demonstrating potential to enhance transition experiences. Feasibility testing will be crucial to validate its effectiveness and facilitate successful integration into clinical practice.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3> <p>This study was initially presented at the Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust's Involvement group of young people to gather their thoughts on it. They were supportive of the study design and gave constructive feedback on the study. A PPI representative with lived experience was part of the study team who was involved in developing and reviewing all study materials, was part of monthly reviews of the study's progress an
背景:儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)的危机和联络小组为在社区(危机)或在急性医院(联络)经历心理健康危机的年轻人提供密集的短期支持。对于这些团队如何运作,目前还没有一个基于证据的模型。旨在改善急症医院出院情况的安全护理包已经过调整,适用于成人(安全护理- mh)和年轻人(安全护理- ymh)的精神健康住院病人出院情况。本研究采用了旨在改善CAMHS住院护理(safe - ymh)出院率的护理包,并利用利益相关者的反馈对其进行调整,使其适用于CAMHS危机和联络团队。设计:与医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)、年轻人和父母/照顾者进行焦点小组讨论,介绍SAFER护理包,并讨论在CAMHS危机和联络小组中使用的必要调整。转录本分析遵循正常化过程理论(NPT)框架,以确定实施和必要调整的障碍和促进因素。结果:参与者表示,将SAFER-YCL护理包集成到电子病历中,自动从其他表格中提取信息,并提供出院信和安全计划模板,可以作为辅助备忘录,并有可能取代当前的出院文件。它需要避免增加工作人员的文件负担,并具有灵活性,以便在适当的时候由不同的工作人员管理。结论:SAFER-YCL护理包已成功开发用于CAMHS危机和联络服务的实施,显示出增强过渡经验的潜力。可行性测试对于验证其有效性和促进成功融入临床实践至关重要。患者或公众贡献:这项研究最初是在诺丁汉郡医疗保健NHS基金会信托的年轻人参与小组中提出的,以收集他们对它的想法。他们支持研究设计,并对研究提供建设性的反馈。一名有实际经验的PPI代表是研究小组的一员,他参与开发和审查所有研究材料,参与研究进展的月度审查,并支持数据收集、分析和研究结果的撰写。
{"title":"Investigating the Applicability of the SAFER-YCL Care Bundle for Transitions From CAMHS Crisis and Liaison Services: The Barriers and Enablers","authors":"James Roe,&nbsp;Neve Jones,&nbsp;Leonie Lewis,&nbsp;Natasha Tyler,&nbsp;Maria Panagioti,&nbsp;Sewanu Awhangansi,&nbsp;Nisha Balan,&nbsp;Nicola Wright,&nbsp;Richard Morriss,&nbsp;Kapil Sayal,&nbsp;Pallab Majumder,&nbsp;Josephine Holland","doi":"10.1111/hex.70579","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70579","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Crisis and Liaison teams in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) offer intensive, short-term support to young people experiencing mental health crisis in the community (Crisis) or admitted to acute hospitals (Liaison). There is no evidence-based model for how these teams operate. The SAFER care bundle, designed to improve discharges from acute hospitals, has been adapted for use in mental health inpatient discharges for adults (SAFER-MH) and young people (SAFER-YMH). This study took a care bundle designed to improve discharges from CAMHS inpatient care (SAFER-YMH) and used stakeholder feedback to adapt it for use in CAMHS Crisis and Liaison teams.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Design&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Focus groups were carried out with healthcare professionals (HCPs), young people and parents/carers to present the SAFER care bundle and discuss necessary adaptations for use in CAMHS Crisis and Liaison teams. Analysis of transcripts followed a Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) framework to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and necessary adaptations.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Participants expressed that integrating the SAFER-YCL care bundle into the electronic patient record, automatically pulling information from other forms, and providing a template for discharge letters and safety plans could serve as an aide-memoire and potentially replace current discharge documents. It would need to avoid increasing documentation burden for staff and have flexibility to be administered by different staff members and at an appropriate time.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The SAFER-YCL care bundle has been successfully developed for implementation in CAMHS Crisis and Liaison services, demonstrating potential to enhance transition experiences. Feasibility testing will be crucial to validate its effectiveness and facilitate successful integration into clinical practice.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Patient or Public Contribution&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study was initially presented at the Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust's Involvement group of young people to gather their thoughts on it. They were supportive of the study design and gave constructive feedback on the study. A PPI representative with lived experience was part of the study team who was involved in developing and reviewing all study materials, was part of monthly reviews of the study's progress an","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12863418/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146108274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public Contribution in Qualitative Research With Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Description of and Reflections on a Collaborative Data Analysis Approach 在质性研究中的公共贡献与接受癌症治疗的儿童的父母:对协作数据分析方法的描述和思考。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70586
Ella Thiblin, Christina Reuther, Mattias Bergqvist, Tho Huynh, Johan Lundgren, Sandra Rösler, Joanne Woodford, Louise von Essen
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Collaborative data analysis (CDA) in qualitative research is an approach for working with public contributors as co-researchers in analysing data. Different approaches have been outlined in a Best Practice Framework for CDA: (1) consultation; (2) development; (3) application; and (4) development and application. Four characteristics of successful CDA are also presented; that the CDA process is: (1) co-produced; (2) realistic within available time and resources; (3) manageable for public contributors; and (4) effective in handling group dynamics and expectations. We adopted a development and application approach to CDA to analyse data from a qualitative study embedded within the single-arm feasibility trial ENGAGE, exploring the acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (EJDeR) for parents of children treated for cancer, and study procedures.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>Overall aim: to describe and reflect on the CDA approach used. Specific objectives: to (1) describe the CDA approach used; (2) reflect on the CDA approach used and map reflections onto characteristics of successful CDA; (3) summarise the potential impact of the CDA approach used on findings; and (4) report the costs of the public contribution activities.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Three public contributors collaborated with three research team members to analyse 36 qualitative interviews using the Framework Method. Public contributors received training and supervision, completed all analysis steps, independently developed coding frameworks, applied them to the data and interpreted findings. Together with research team members, they took part in a workshop to reflect on the CDA approach used, with reflections mapped onto four characteristics of successful CDA.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Findings</h3> <p>In the reflection workshop, the CDA approach was described as including the characteristics of successful CDA, for example, that public contributors handled demands of the process well, and that relationships and power dynamics were well managed. Potential impact on findings included public contributors bringing in nuances to the analysis overlooked by research team members, for example, their analysis highlighted that participants in ENGAGE experienced difficulties differentiating between EJDeR and ENGAGE study procedures. Public contributors and research team members categorised data in slightly different ways. The total cost for public contribution activities was ≈2
背景:定性研究中的协作数据分析(CDA)是一种与公共贡献者作为共同研究人员进行数据分析的方法。CDA最佳实践框架概述了不同的方法:(1)咨询;(2)发展;(3)应用程序;(4)开发应用。提出了成功批评性话语分析的四个特点;CDA过程是:(1)共同生产;(2)在可获得的时间和资源范围内切实可行;(三)对社会出资人可管理的;(4)有效处理群体动态和期望。我们采用了CDA的开发和应用方法来分析单臂可行性试验ENGAGE中嵌入的定性研究数据,探索认知行为治疗干预(EJDeR)对接受癌症治疗的儿童父母的可接受性和可行性,以及研究程序。目标:总体目标:描述和反思所使用的批评性分析方法。具体目标:(1)描述使用的CDA方法;(2)反思所采用的批评性数据分析方法,并将反思映射到成功批评性数据分析的特征上;(3)总结CDA方法对研究结果的潜在影响;(四)报告公益捐赠活动的费用。方法:3名公众撰稿人与3名研究团队成员合作,采用框架方法对36个定性访谈进行分析。公众贡献者接受培训和监督,完成所有分析步骤,独立开发编码框架,将其应用于数据并解释结果。他们与研究团队成员一起参加了一个研讨会,反思所使用的批评性话语分析方法,并将反思映射到成功批评性话语分析的四个特征。在反思研讨会上,CDA方法被描述为包括成功CDA的特征,例如,公共贡献者很好地处理了过程的需求,关系和权力动态得到了很好的管理。对研究结果的潜在影响包括公共贡献者带来了被研究团队成员忽视的分析的细微差别,例如,他们的分析强调了参与ENGAGE的参与者在区分EJDeR和ENGAGE研究程序方面遇到了困难。公众贡献者和研究团队成员对数据的分类方式略有不同。公众捐款活动的总费用约为21,963欧元。结论:所使用的CDA方法通过提供一个采用开发和应用方法的CDA示例,扩展了CDA的最佳实践框架。我们对使用的CDA方法的描述可以告知其他对CDA感兴趣的研究人员,并有助于在整个研究生命周期中嵌入道德和公平的公共贡献的持续对话。患者或公众贡献:公众贡献者和研究团队成员对所描述的反思以及手稿的写作、编辑和审查做出了贡献。
{"title":"Public Contribution in Qualitative Research With Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Description of and Reflections on a Collaborative Data Analysis Approach","authors":"Ella Thiblin,&nbsp;Christina Reuther,&nbsp;Mattias Bergqvist,&nbsp;Tho Huynh,&nbsp;Johan Lundgren,&nbsp;Sandra Rösler,&nbsp;Joanne Woodford,&nbsp;Louise von Essen","doi":"10.1111/hex.70586","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70586","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Collaborative data analysis (CDA) in qualitative research is an approach for working with public contributors as co-researchers in analysing data. Different approaches have been outlined in a Best Practice Framework for CDA: (1) consultation; (2) development; (3) application; and (4) development and application. Four characteristics of successful CDA are also presented; that the CDA process is: (1) co-produced; (2) realistic within available time and resources; (3) manageable for public contributors; and (4) effective in handling group dynamics and expectations. We adopted a development and application approach to CDA to analyse data from a qualitative study embedded within the single-arm feasibility trial ENGAGE, exploring the acceptability and feasibility of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (EJDeR) for parents of children treated for cancer, and study procedures.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Overall aim: to describe and reflect on the CDA approach used. Specific objectives: to (1) describe the CDA approach used; (2) reflect on the CDA approach used and map reflections onto characteristics of successful CDA; (3) summarise the potential impact of the CDA approach used on findings; and (4) report the costs of the public contribution activities.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Three public contributors collaborated with three research team members to analyse 36 qualitative interviews using the Framework Method. Public contributors received training and supervision, completed all analysis steps, independently developed coding frameworks, applied them to the data and interpreted findings. Together with research team members, they took part in a workshop to reflect on the CDA approach used, with reflections mapped onto four characteristics of successful CDA.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Findings&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;In the reflection workshop, the CDA approach was described as including the characteristics of successful CDA, for example, that public contributors handled demands of the process well, and that relationships and power dynamics were well managed. Potential impact on findings included public contributors bringing in nuances to the analysis overlooked by research team members, for example, their analysis highlighted that participants in ENGAGE experienced difficulties differentiating between EJDeR and ENGAGE study procedures. Public contributors and research team members categorised data in slightly different ways. The total cost for public contribution activities was ≈2","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12860903/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146097527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Co-Design of a New Integrated Care Model With People Affected by Huntington's Disease: A Mixed Methods Study 与亨廷顿舞蹈病患者共同设计一种新的综合护理模式:一项混合方法研究
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70584
Sandra Bartolomeu Pires, Dorit Kunkel, Karine Manera, Nicholas Goodwin, Christopher Kipps, Mari Carmen Portillo

Background

People living with neurological conditions have needs that require an integrated care approach. Existing models of integrated care have often emphasized system structures but neglected the micro-level interactions that matter most to people.

Objectives

To develop a micro-level model for integrated care that represents the care components most valued by people affected by Huntington's disease (HD).

Methods

A mixed methods study with a co-designed approach was delivered through three phases. This paper reports on the latest two, where interviews and workshops were conducted with people with lived experience of HD and professionals, from January to October 2024. Patient and public contributors were involved from project design to data interpretation.

Results

Three themes were identified that position integrated care from the perspective of those affected by HD, representing these as the EC4Neuro model. Theme 1 identified the core components of micro-level integrated care: expert knowledge, person- and family-centred care, care coordination and continuity of care. Theme 2 underlined access inequities. Theme 3 highlighted people's responsibility to manage care without true agency to do so. The workshops prioritized strategies that enhance relational continuity between service users and providers. A tiered strategy was undertaken to support decision-making towards improving person-centred outcomes.

Conclusions

EC4Neuro is the first integrated care model developed in HD. Its co-designed approach with end users successfully embedded people's perspective to guide what needs to be achieved at the micro-level. The EC4Neuro model offers prospective replication opportunities, particularly for stakeholders concerned with reducing access inequities and supporting relational continuity.

Patient or Public Contribution

A group of 25 experts by lived experience of HD and other neurological disorders, co-designed this research project, working with the researchers from conception of the studies to analysis and interpretation of the data.

背景:神经系统疾病患者需要综合护理方法。现有的综合护理模式往往强调系统结构,但忽视了对人最重要的微观层面的相互作用。目的:开发一个微观层面的综合护理模型,代表亨廷顿舞蹈病(HD)患者最重视的护理组成部分。方法:采用联合设计的混合方法研究,分三个阶段进行。本文报告了最近的两次调查,从2024年1月到10月,对有过HD生活经验的人和专业人士进行了采访和研讨会。从项目设计到数据解释,患者和公众贡献者都参与其中。结果:确定了三个主题,从HD患者的角度定位综合护理,将其表示为EC4Neuro模型。主题1确定了微观综合护理的核心组成部分:专业知识、以个人和家庭为中心的护理、护理协调和护理的连续性。主题2强调了获取不平等。主题3强调了人们在没有真正机构的情况下管理护理的责任。讲习班优先考虑了加强服务用户和提供者之间关系连续性的战略。采取了一项分层战略,以支持决策以改善以人为本的结果。结论:EC4Neuro是首个针对HD开发的综合护理模式。它与最终用户共同设计的方法成功地嵌入了人们的观点,以指导在微观层面上需要实现的目标。EC4Neuro模型提供了潜在的复制机会,特别是对于关注减少访问不平等和支持关系连续性的利益相关者。患者或公众贡献:一个由25名有HD和其他神经系统疾病经验的专家组成的小组共同设计了这个研究项目,与研究人员一起从研究的概念到数据的分析和解释。
{"title":"Co-Design of a New Integrated Care Model With People Affected by Huntington's Disease: A Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Sandra Bartolomeu Pires,&nbsp;Dorit Kunkel,&nbsp;Karine Manera,&nbsp;Nicholas Goodwin,&nbsp;Christopher Kipps,&nbsp;Mari Carmen Portillo","doi":"10.1111/hex.70584","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70584","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>People living with neurological conditions have needs that require an integrated care approach. Existing models of integrated care have often emphasized system structures but neglected the micro-level interactions that matter most to people.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To develop a micro-level model for integrated care that represents the care components most valued by people affected by Huntington's disease (HD).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A mixed methods study with a co-designed approach was delivered through three phases. This paper reports on the latest two, where interviews and workshops were conducted with people with lived experience of HD and professionals, from January to October 2024. Patient and public contributors were involved from project design to data interpretation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Three themes were identified that position integrated care from the perspective of those affected by HD, representing these as the EC4Neuro model. Theme 1 identified the core components of micro-level integrated care: expert knowledge, person- and family-centred care, care coordination and continuity of care. Theme 2 underlined access inequities. Theme 3 highlighted people's responsibility to manage care without true agency to do so. The workshops prioritized strategies that enhance relational continuity between service users and providers. A tiered strategy was undertaken to support decision-making towards improving person-centred outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>EC4Neuro is the first integrated care model developed in HD. Its co-designed approach with end users successfully embedded people's perspective to guide what needs to be achieved at the micro-level. The EC4Neuro model offers prospective replication opportunities, particularly for stakeholders concerned with reducing access inequities and supporting relational continuity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A group of 25 experts by lived experience of HD and other neurological disorders, co-designed this research project, working with the researchers from conception of the studies to analysis and interpretation of the data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12860904/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146097539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empowering Older Patients in Advance Care Planning: Evaluating MyCare™ as a Decision Support Tool 授权老年患者提前护理计划:评估MyCare™作为决策支持工具。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70545
Alixe Ménard, Yamini Singh, Christina Yin, Sydney Ruller, Lauren Konikoff, Jackie Kierulf, Carol Bennett, Douglas Manuel, Shane Kirkham, Daniel Kobewka
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Older adults with serious illness often face treatment decisions shaped by personal values, yet recognising and expressing those values in ways that guide decision-making can be challenging. This study evaluated the acceptability, usability and effectiveness of MyCare, a digital values clarification tool designed to help older adults identify and communicate their care preferences to substitute decision-makers, healthcare providers and support persons.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>This convergent mixed-methods study explored older adults' experiences with MyCare. Acceptability was assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability survey and qualitative interviews examining perceptions of the tool's relevance and ease of use. Usability was measured with the System Usability Scale and participant feedback on navigation and clarity. Potential effectiveness was evaluated based on self-reported ability to articulate and discuss care preferences. Semi-structured interviews explored these outcomes in depth and were analysed using thematic analysis.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>A total of 15 participants (mean age = 83.5 years, SD = 7.6) were surveyed and interviewed between November 2024 and January 2025, including five dyads (one son and mother, three husband-wife pairs, and two sisters). Key themes identified included: (1) navigating autonomy and delegation in end-of-life decision-making, (2) fragmented communication, (3) influence of lived and observed experiences on care decisions, (4) fears around acceptable and unacceptable quality of life, and (5) using MyCare to promote proactive care planning. Participants reported moderate electronic health literacy, and survey results indicated high usability (SUS mean 83.2/100) and strong acceptability of MyCare, particularly in comfort, perceived value and ease of use.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusions</h3> <p>MyCare demonstrated high acceptability and usability, with participants finding it effective in clarifying and communicating care preferences. It facilitated discussions about quality of life and decision-making, though challenges remain in addressing prognostic uncertainty and aligning preferences with realistic care goals. Future research should refine the tool to enhance its integration into routine healthcare settings.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3> <p>A patient partner was in
背景:患有严重疾病的老年人往往面临由个人价值观塑造的治疗决定,然而,以指导决策的方式认识和表达这些价值观可能具有挑战性。这项研究评估了MyCare的可接受性、可用性和有效性,MyCare是一种数字价值澄清工具,旨在帮助老年人识别并向替代决策者、医疗保健提供者和支持人员传达他们的护理偏好。方法:本融合混合方法研究探讨老年人使用MyCare的经验。可接受性是使用可接受性调查的理论框架和定性访谈来评估工具的相关性和易用性。可用性是通过系统可用性量表和参与者对导航和清晰度的反馈来衡量的。根据自我报告的表达和讨论护理偏好的能力来评估潜在的有效性。半结构化访谈深入探讨了这些结果,并使用主题分析进行了分析。结果:在2024年11月至2025年1月期间,共对15名参与者(平均年龄= 83.5岁,SD = 7.6)进行了调查和访谈,其中包括5对夫妻(1对儿子和母亲,3对夫妻和2对姐妹)。确定的关键主题包括:(1)在临终决策中导航自主和授权;(2)碎片化沟通;(3)生活和观察经验对护理决策的影响;(4)对可接受和不可接受的生活质量的恐惧;(5)使用MyCare促进积极的护理计划。参与者报告了中等程度的电子健康素养,调查结果表明MyCare的可用性高(SUS平均值为83.2/100),可接受性强,特别是在舒适度、感知价值和易用性方面。结论:MyCare表现出很高的可接受性和可用性,参与者发现它在澄清和沟通护理偏好方面是有效的。它促进了关于生活质量和决策的讨论,尽管在解决预后不确定性和使偏好与现实护理目标保持一致方面仍然存在挑战。未来的研究应完善该工具,以提高其集成到常规医疗保健设置。患者或公众贡献:一名患者伴侣从本研究开始就作为合著者和共同决策者参与了MyCare的设计和开发。他们作为患有严重疾病的人的配偶的生活经历为该工具的结构和优先事项提供了信息,以确保其与患者需求相关。在此之后,我们邀请了更多的患者作为研究参与者来提供可用性和功能的反馈。他们的见解正被用于改进和调整MyCare,以最大限度地提高其对未来患者的影响。
{"title":"Empowering Older Patients in Advance Care Planning: Evaluating MyCare™ as a Decision Support Tool","authors":"Alixe Ménard,&nbsp;Yamini Singh,&nbsp;Christina Yin,&nbsp;Sydney Ruller,&nbsp;Lauren Konikoff,&nbsp;Jackie Kierulf,&nbsp;Carol Bennett,&nbsp;Douglas Manuel,&nbsp;Shane Kirkham,&nbsp;Daniel Kobewka","doi":"10.1111/hex.70545","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70545","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Older adults with serious illness often face treatment decisions shaped by personal values, yet recognising and expressing those values in ways that guide decision-making can be challenging. This study evaluated the acceptability, usability and effectiveness of MyCare, a digital values clarification tool designed to help older adults identify and communicate their care preferences to substitute decision-makers, healthcare providers and support persons.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This convergent mixed-methods study explored older adults' experiences with MyCare. Acceptability was assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability survey and qualitative interviews examining perceptions of the tool's relevance and ease of use. Usability was measured with the System Usability Scale and participant feedback on navigation and clarity. Potential effectiveness was evaluated based on self-reported ability to articulate and discuss care preferences. Semi-structured interviews explored these outcomes in depth and were analysed using thematic analysis.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A total of 15 participants (mean age = 83.5 years, SD = 7.6) were surveyed and interviewed between November 2024 and January 2025, including five dyads (one son and mother, three husband-wife pairs, and two sisters). Key themes identified included: (1) navigating autonomy and delegation in end-of-life decision-making, (2) fragmented communication, (3) influence of lived and observed experiences on care decisions, (4) fears around acceptable and unacceptable quality of life, and (5) using MyCare to promote proactive care planning. Participants reported moderate electronic health literacy, and survey results indicated high usability (SUS mean 83.2/100) and strong acceptability of MyCare, particularly in comfort, perceived value and ease of use.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;MyCare demonstrated high acceptability and usability, with participants finding it effective in clarifying and communicating care preferences. It facilitated discussions about quality of life and decision-making, though challenges remain in addressing prognostic uncertainty and aligning preferences with realistic care goals. Future research should refine the tool to enhance its integration into routine healthcare settings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Patient or Public Contribution&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A patient partner was in","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857778/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Co-Designing a Peer Navigator Role to Improve Equity in Healthcare Access for Pacific Islander, Māori and Arabic Communities in Australia 共同设计同伴导航员作用,以改善太平洋岛民、Māori和澳大利亚阿拉伯社区获得医疗保健的公平性。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70351
Lubab Shwaita, Simone Said, Susan D. Whicker, Fan Hoak, Lizcha Kaivaha, Wadeed Salboud, Charan Stevenson, Mokhaled Mohammed, Yue Hu, Rebecca L. Jessup

Background

There is a great deal of variation in the design and delivery of the peer health navigator role, making it difficult to adapt role responsibilities into context. In this study, we aimed to co-design a bicultural peer health navigator (BPHN) role to meet the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) people from Pacific Islander, Māori and Arabic-speaking backgrounds.

Methods

A two-phase co-design approach involving workshops with follow-up member checking via interview was used to gain insight into factors affecting patient interaction and access barriers to health services.

Results

Barriers described by participants emerged under five major themes—overcoming language barriers, improving communication, navigation and access to information, appointment reminders, and health and social services education in the community.

Conclusion

Clear tasks for the BPHN role were identified by the participants to improve accessibility and usage of healthcare services. Future work should involve feasibility testing with the support and involvement of community members, BPHNs and their supervisors and importantly health service leaders.

Patient or Public Contribution

Four of the authors were employed as bicultural peer health navigators (BPHNs) who engaged their communities to organise and conduct these workshops in their preferred language. This approach enabled an inclusive environment for the participants to share their thoughts and experiences. The proposed roles for a BPHN were generated from the workshop discussions. The BPHNs conducted the semi-structured verification interviews with the workshop participants. The thematic analysis was conducted by two of the BPHNs, with one being the primary author.

背景:同伴健康导航员角色的设计和交付存在很大差异,使得角色职责难以适应环境。在本研究中,我们旨在共同设计一个双文化同伴健康导航员(BPHN)角色,以满足来自太平洋岛民、Māori和阿拉伯语背景的文化和语言多样性(CALD)人群的需求。方法:采用两阶段的共同设计方法,包括研讨会和随访成员通过访谈进行检查,以深入了解影响患者互动和获得卫生服务障碍的因素。结果:参与者描述的障碍出现在五个主要主题下:克服语言障碍、改善沟通、导航和获取信息、预约提醒以及社区卫生和社会服务教育。结论:参与者确定了BPHN角色的明确任务,以改善医疗保健服务的可及性和使用率。今后的工作应包括在社区成员、bphn及其主管以及重要的保健服务领导的支持和参与下进行可行性测试。患者或公众贡献:四名作者被聘为双文化同伴健康导航员(bphn),他们让他们的社区用他们喜欢的语言组织和举办这些讲习班。这种方法为参与者提供了一个包容的环境来分享他们的想法和经验。BPHN的建议角色是从研讨会讨论中产生的。bphn对讲习班参与者进行了半结构化的验证访谈。专题分析是由两个bphn进行的,其中一个是主要作者。
{"title":"Co-Designing a Peer Navigator Role to Improve Equity in Healthcare Access for Pacific Islander, Māori and Arabic Communities in Australia","authors":"Lubab Shwaita,&nbsp;Simone Said,&nbsp;Susan D. Whicker,&nbsp;Fan Hoak,&nbsp;Lizcha Kaivaha,&nbsp;Wadeed Salboud,&nbsp;Charan Stevenson,&nbsp;Mokhaled Mohammed,&nbsp;Yue Hu,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Jessup","doi":"10.1111/hex.70351","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70351","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There is a great deal of variation in the design and delivery of the peer health navigator role, making it difficult to adapt role responsibilities into context. In this study, we aimed to co-design a bicultural peer health navigator (BPHN) role to meet the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) people from Pacific Islander, Māori and Arabic-speaking backgrounds.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A two-phase co-design approach involving workshops with follow-up member checking via interview was used to gain insight into factors affecting patient interaction and access barriers to health services.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Barriers described by participants emerged under five major themes—overcoming language barriers, improving communication, navigation and access to information, appointment reminders, and health and social services education in the community.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clear tasks for the BPHN role were identified by the participants to improve accessibility and usage of healthcare services. Future work should involve feasibility testing with the support and involvement of community members, BPHNs and their supervisors and importantly health service leaders.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four of the authors were employed as bicultural peer health navigators (BPHNs) who engaged their communities to organise and conduct these workshops in their preferred language. This approach enabled an inclusive environment for the participants to share their thoughts and experiences. The proposed roles for a BPHN were generated from the workshop discussions. The BPHNs conducted the semi-structured verification interviews with the workshop participants. The thematic analysis was conducted by two of the BPHNs, with one being the primary author.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12853215/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146088166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Until You Get the Diagnosis You're Forever in Limbo’—Parents' Experiences of Waiting for an Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment With Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services “在你得到诊断之前,你永远处于不确定状态”——父母在儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构等待注意力缺陷/多动障碍评估的经历。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70569
Ellen Hedstrom, Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne, Claire Ballard, Naomi James, Hannah Wright, David Daley, Cris Glazebrook, Jana Kreppner, Claire Cattel, Douglas Gordon, Natalie Gordon, Tessa Tuttlebee, Edmund Sonuga-Barke
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Parents in the United Kingdom seeking an assessment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for their child experience a significant wait before receiving an appointment with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), yet little has been written on how parents experience this period. Through qualitative interviews, we sought to understand how the period of waiting from being accepted onto a service waitlist and receiving a diagnostic assessment impacts parents and their children.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Method</h3> <p>The study was nested within a large randomised controlled trial. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 41 parents of children aged 5–11 years. 30% of parents had waited between 18 and 24 months on a CAMHS waitlist, with 10% waiting more than 2 years. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse data.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>At the point of the interview, around 50% of children were still waiting for an initial assessment. Six themes reflecting parents' uncertainty around the assessment process, lack of communication from services, the importance of receiving a diagnosis, difficulty accessing support and the negative impact of waiting on mental health and education, as well as recommendations to improve communication between services and families, emerged.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>Parents recognised the pressures on services to offer timely support; however, their well-being could be substantially improved by more clarity around wait times, as well as more effective signposting and support from services concerning the assessment process. This may help alleviate some of the stressors associated with their child's assessment journey, such as feeling responsible for their child's difficulties and the burden of supporting their educational needs.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3> <p>This study was nested within the OPTIMA trial, where PPI panel members provided ongoing support in various aspects of the study, including advising on participant communication, study design and data analysis. All PPI members have lived experience of having a neurodivergent child. For this study, the PPI co-produced the interview schedule and took part in transcript analysis using a thematic framework approach. To acknowledge their contributions, members of the PPI panel are included as co-authors.</p>
背景:在英国,父母在接受儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)的预约之前,要为他们的孩子评估注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD),但很少有关于父母如何经历这一时期的文章。通过定性访谈,我们试图了解从被接受进入服务候补名单到接受诊断评估的等待时间如何影响父母和他们的孩子。方法:采用大型随机对照试验。我们对41位5-11岁儿童的家长进行了半结构化访谈。30%的父母在CAMHS的等待名单上等待了18到24个月,10%的人等待了2年以上。数据分析采用自反性专题分析。结果:在访谈时,约50%的儿童仍在等待初步评估。出现了六个主题,反映了家长对评估过程的不确定性、服务机构缺乏沟通、接受诊断的重要性、难以获得支持、等待对心理健康和教育的负面影响,以及改善服务机构与家庭之间沟通的建议。结论:家长认识到服务机构提供及时支持的压力;然而,他们的福祉可以通过更明确的等待时间,以及更有效的路标和有关评估过程的服务支持而大大改善。这可能有助于减轻与孩子的评估过程相关的一些压力因素,例如对孩子的困难负责和支持他们的教育需求的负担。患者和公众贡献:该研究嵌套在OPTIMA试验中,PPI小组成员在研究的各个方面提供持续支持,包括参与者沟通、研究设计和数据分析方面的建议。所有PPI成员都有过神经分化儿童的生活经历。在本研究中,PPI共同制作了访谈时间表,并使用主题框架方法参与了文本分析。为了表彰他们的贡献,PPI小组的成员被列为共同作者。
{"title":"‘Until You Get the Diagnosis You're Forever in Limbo’—Parents' Experiences of Waiting for an Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment With Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services","authors":"Ellen Hedstrom,&nbsp;Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne,&nbsp;Claire Ballard,&nbsp;Naomi James,&nbsp;Hannah Wright,&nbsp;David Daley,&nbsp;Cris Glazebrook,&nbsp;Jana Kreppner,&nbsp;Claire Cattel,&nbsp;Douglas Gordon,&nbsp;Natalie Gordon,&nbsp;Tessa Tuttlebee,&nbsp;Edmund Sonuga-Barke","doi":"10.1111/hex.70569","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70569","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Parents in the United Kingdom seeking an assessment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for their child experience a significant wait before receiving an appointment with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), yet little has been written on how parents experience this period. Through qualitative interviews, we sought to understand how the period of waiting from being accepted onto a service waitlist and receiving a diagnostic assessment impacts parents and their children.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Method&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The study was nested within a large randomised controlled trial. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 41 parents of children aged 5–11 years. 30% of parents had waited between 18 and 24 months on a CAMHS waitlist, with 10% waiting more than 2 years. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse data.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;At the point of the interview, around 50% of children were still waiting for an initial assessment. Six themes reflecting parents' uncertainty around the assessment process, lack of communication from services, the importance of receiving a diagnosis, difficulty accessing support and the negative impact of waiting on mental health and education, as well as recommendations to improve communication between services and families, emerged.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Parents recognised the pressures on services to offer timely support; however, their well-being could be substantially improved by more clarity around wait times, as well as more effective signposting and support from services concerning the assessment process. This may help alleviate some of the stressors associated with their child's assessment journey, such as feeling responsible for their child's difficulties and the burden of supporting their educational needs.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Patient and Public Contribution&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study was nested within the OPTIMA trial, where PPI panel members provided ongoing support in various aspects of the study, including advising on participant communication, study design and data analysis. All PPI members have lived experience of having a neurodivergent child. For this study, the PPI co-produced the interview schedule and took part in transcript analysis using a thematic framework approach. To acknowledge their contributions, members of the PPI panel are included as co-authors.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848897/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146068265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Access to Healthcare Services for the Deaf: A Scoping Review of Reviews 聋人获得医疗保健服务:综述的范围综述
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70554
Marie-Mychèle Pratte, Magaly Brodeur, Marie-Eve Perron, Catherine Hudon
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Cultural and linguistic minorities are at a higher risk of poorer health, poorer health outcomes, and poorer quality of care, in part due to a lack of access to healthcare services. Inequities in access to healthcare services have been found in several Deaf populations and are associated with poorer physical and mental health outcomes.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>This review aims to describe the breadth, scope, and nature of the literature on access to healthcare services for Deaf adults.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>A scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley. Ten scientific databases and grey literature were searched for reviews published between 2000 and 2025 in English, French, American Sign Language, and Quebec Sign Language. A chart form was created for extraction. Results were analyzed using narrative synthesis and the Levesque et al. conceptual framework of access to healthcare. Research priorities were identified during a deliberative workshop with members of the Deaf community in Québec, Canada.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Eighteen reviews were included in this study. All dimensions of the conceptual framework have been explored (approachability, ability to perceive, acceptability, ability to seek, availability and accommodation, ability to reach, affordability, ability to pay, appropriateness, and ability to engage). Our analysis revealed new factors influencing access that need to be considered: cultural competence, communication barriers, sociodemographic characteristics, and technological support. We also identified that the social inclusion of the Deaf impacts multiple dimensions in a cross-sectional manner.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>The Deaf face barriers to accessing healthcare services at every stage of their pathway. This review has identified several areas of access where further research is needed to address the disparities experienced by Deaf communities. There is an urgent need to involve the Deaf community in shaping the research on their access to healthcare services.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3> <p>A Deaf patient partner contributed as a co-researcher to the study design, the conduct of the review, and the interpretation of the data. This collaboratio
背景:文化和语言上的少数群体健康状况较差、健康结果较差、护理质量较差的风险较高,部分原因是缺乏获得医疗保健服务的机会。在一些聋人群体中发现了获得医疗保健服务的不公平现象,这与较差的身心健康结果有关。目的:本综述旨在描述聋成人获得卫生保健服务的文献的广度、范围和性质。方法:根据Arksey和O'Malley进行范围综述。检索了2000年至2025年间以英语、法语、美国手语和魁北克手语发表的10个科学数据库和灰色文献。为提取创建了一个图表表单。使用叙事综合和Levesque等人的医疗保健可及性概念框架对结果进行分析。在加拿大曲海贝特与聋人社区成员举行的审议讲习班上确定了研究重点。结果:本研究纳入18篇综述。概念框架的所有维度都进行了探讨(可接近性、感知能力、可接受性、寻求能力、可用性和住宿能力、达到能力、可负担性、支付能力、适当性和参与能力)。我们的分析揭示了需要考虑的影响获取的新因素:文化能力、沟通障碍、社会人口特征和技术支持。我们还发现,聋人的社会包容以横截面的方式影响着多个维度。结论:聋人在其人生道路的每个阶段都面临着获得医疗服务的障碍。本综述确定了几个需要进一步研究的领域,以解决聋人社区所经历的差异。迫切需要让聋人社区参与制定他们获得医疗保健服务的研究。患者或公众贡献:一名聋人患者作为共同研究者参与研究设计、审查的实施和数据的解释。这种合作有助于理解和解释综述的发现。
{"title":"Access to Healthcare Services for the Deaf: A Scoping Review of Reviews","authors":"Marie-Mychèle Pratte,&nbsp;Magaly Brodeur,&nbsp;Marie-Eve Perron,&nbsp;Catherine Hudon","doi":"10.1111/hex.70554","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70554","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Cultural and linguistic minorities are at a higher risk of poorer health, poorer health outcomes, and poorer quality of care, in part due to a lack of access to healthcare services. Inequities in access to healthcare services have been found in several Deaf populations and are associated with poorer physical and mental health outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This review aims to describe the breadth, scope, and nature of the literature on access to healthcare services for Deaf adults.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley. Ten scientific databases and grey literature were searched for reviews published between 2000 and 2025 in English, French, American Sign Language, and Quebec Sign Language. A chart form was created for extraction. Results were analyzed using narrative synthesis and the Levesque et al. conceptual framework of access to healthcare. Research priorities were identified during a deliberative workshop with members of the Deaf community in Québec, Canada.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Eighteen reviews were included in this study. All dimensions of the conceptual framework have been explored (approachability, ability to perceive, acceptability, ability to seek, availability and accommodation, ability to reach, affordability, ability to pay, appropriateness, and ability to engage). Our analysis revealed new factors influencing access that need to be considered: cultural competence, communication barriers, sociodemographic characteristics, and technological support. We also identified that the social inclusion of the Deaf impacts multiple dimensions in a cross-sectional manner.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The Deaf face barriers to accessing healthcare services at every stage of their pathway. This review has identified several areas of access where further research is needed to address the disparities experienced by Deaf communities. There is an urgent need to involve the Deaf community in shaping the research on their access to healthcare services.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Patient or Public Contribution&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A Deaf patient partner contributed as a co-researcher to the study design, the conduct of the review, and the interpretation of the data. This collaboratio","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12833614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Process of Patient Engagement: Insights from a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Cancer Center Patient Advisory Group 评估患者参与的过程:来自癌症中心患者咨询小组的混合方法评估的见解。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70581
Lauren Kearney, Tracy Battaglia, Karina Verma, Sara Shusterman, Michelle Hall, Gemmae Fix, Katrina Steiling
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Patient engagement is associated with improved care quality, better health outcomes, increased trust and satisfaction, and reduced costs. Patient engagement is recommended in cancer care. Patient advisory groups (PAGs) are a commonly used approach for engaging patients. However, more evidence is needed to understand how effectively PAGs support meaningful engagement, what factors shape that engagement, and how their contributions align with program goals. This study used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate patient engagement within a PAG supporting an oncology quality improvement initiative.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>The Oncology Equity Alliance (OEA), a quality improvement initiative to improve care coordination and reduce time to treatment, established a PAG to engage patients throughout the initiative. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation of PAG engagement. Focus groups with PAG members and qualitative interviews with OEA team members were rapidly analyzed to identify engagement successes and challenges, and to determine engagement principles to focus on for survey evaluation. Perceptions of PAG engagement were assessed via surveys of PAG members and OEA team members, using selected items from the Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST). Surveys were analyzed descriptively and according to the REST scoring scheme.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Focus groups (<i>n</i> = 2) and interviews (<i>n</i> = 3) identified key facilitators that supported engagement including deliberate coordination, mutual respect, a sense of belonging, and co-learning. Engagement was also positively impacted by members' motivations for joining the PAG and practical and logistical considerations. Challenges included PAG members' desire for greater understanding of the project's impact, more agenda setting, and ongoing education about OEA core components. This qualitative data informed the selection of engagement principles of focus for quantitative evaluation using REST. A total of 80% of PAG members (<i>n</i> = 10) felt very engaged, with the degree of engagement corresponding to cooperation and collaboration domains; however, for individual survey items, an average of 20% of responses were marked by PAG members as “not applicable.”</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>This mixed-method evaluation found strong alignment between program goals and PAG member engagement, highlighted effective strategies, and identified addressable challenges. As patient engagement becomes more common in
背景:患者参与与提高护理质量、改善健康结果、增加信任和满意度以及降低成本相关。癌症治疗建议患者参与。患者咨询小组(PAGs)是吸引患者的常用方法。然而,需要更多的证据来理解pag如何有效地支持有意义的参与,是什么因素塑造了这种参与,以及他们的贡献如何与项目目标相一致。本研究采用混合方法评估PAG中支持肿瘤质量改进计划的患者参与情况。方法:肿瘤学公平联盟(OEA)是一个质量改进倡议,旨在改善护理协调和缩短治疗时间,建立了一个PAG,让患者参与整个倡议。我们对PAG接触情况进行了混合方法评估。对PAG成员的焦点小组和OEA团队成员的定性访谈进行了快速分析,以确定参与的成功和挑战,并确定调查评估的重点参与原则。通过对PAG成员和OEA团队成员的调查,使用研究参与调查工具(REST)中的选定项目,评估PAG参与的看法。根据REST评分方案对调查结果进行描述性分析。结果:焦点小组(n = 2)和访谈(n = 3)确定了支持参与的关键促进因素,包括深思熟虑的协调、相互尊重、归属感和共同学习。成员加入PAG的动机以及实际和后勤方面的考虑也对参与度产生了积极影响。挑战包括PAG成员希望更好地理解项目的影响,更多的议程设置,以及关于OEA核心组件的持续教育。这些定性数据为使用REST进行定量评估的重点参与原则的选择提供了信息。共有80%的PAG成员(n = 10)感到非常投入,投入程度与合作和协作领域相对应;然而,就个别调查项目而言,PAG成员平均有20%的回复被标记为“不适用”。结论:这种混合方法的评估发现项目目标和PAG成员参与之间有很强的一致性,突出了有效的策略,并确定了可解决的挑战。随着患者参与在癌症治疗中变得越来越普遍,应用这些经验对于推进有意义的、以人为本的项目至关重要。患者贡献:本文介绍了对PAG的评价。除了作为研究的参与者,患者咨询小组的成员还参与了成员检查,以验证研究结果,确保解释反映了他们的经验和观点。
{"title":"Evaluating the Process of Patient Engagement: Insights from a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Cancer Center Patient Advisory Group","authors":"Lauren Kearney,&nbsp;Tracy Battaglia,&nbsp;Karina Verma,&nbsp;Sara Shusterman,&nbsp;Michelle Hall,&nbsp;Gemmae Fix,&nbsp;Katrina Steiling","doi":"10.1111/hex.70581","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70581","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Patient engagement is associated with improved care quality, better health outcomes, increased trust and satisfaction, and reduced costs. Patient engagement is recommended in cancer care. Patient advisory groups (PAGs) are a commonly used approach for engaging patients. However, more evidence is needed to understand how effectively PAGs support meaningful engagement, what factors shape that engagement, and how their contributions align with program goals. This study used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate patient engagement within a PAG supporting an oncology quality improvement initiative.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The Oncology Equity Alliance (OEA), a quality improvement initiative to improve care coordination and reduce time to treatment, established a PAG to engage patients throughout the initiative. We conducted a mixed-method evaluation of PAG engagement. Focus groups with PAG members and qualitative interviews with OEA team members were rapidly analyzed to identify engagement successes and challenges, and to determine engagement principles to focus on for survey evaluation. Perceptions of PAG engagement were assessed via surveys of PAG members and OEA team members, using selected items from the Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST). Surveys were analyzed descriptively and according to the REST scoring scheme.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Focus groups (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 2) and interviews (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 3) identified key facilitators that supported engagement including deliberate coordination, mutual respect, a sense of belonging, and co-learning. Engagement was also positively impacted by members' motivations for joining the PAG and practical and logistical considerations. Challenges included PAG members' desire for greater understanding of the project's impact, more agenda setting, and ongoing education about OEA core components. This qualitative data informed the selection of engagement principles of focus for quantitative evaluation using REST. A total of 80% of PAG members (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 10) felt very engaged, with the degree of engagement corresponding to cooperation and collaboration domains; however, for individual survey items, an average of 20% of responses were marked by PAG members as “not applicable.”&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This mixed-method evaluation found strong alignment between program goals and PAG member engagement, highlighted effective strategies, and identified addressable challenges. As patient engagement becomes more common in ","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12831170/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
User Involvement in Transition Care in Virtual 4-Party Meetings: A Qualitative Study 虚拟四方会议中过渡关怀的用户参与:一项定性研究。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70566
Ditte Høgsgaard, Janet Froulund Jensen, Heidi Myglegård Andersen

Background

Older adults with multimorbidity often experience fragmented transitional care between the hospital, primary care, and municipal services. Insufficient communication and limited user involvement can compromise safety, satisfaction, and continuity. To address these challenges, a structured cross-sectoral intervention, the Virtual 4-Party Meeting (V4M), was developed to enhance patient and family involvement in discharge planning.

Aim

To explore how older adults with multimorbidity and their relatives experienced involvement in transitional care through V4M.

Methods

A qualitative hermeneutic design was applied. Eleven patients ( + 65 years) and their relatives participated in semi-structured interviews immediately after V4M and again 14 days post-discharge. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis within a Gadamerian hermeneutic framework.

Results

Three themes emerged: (1) Bridges between Systems. V4M reduced fragmentation and improved coordination through shared dialog; (2) A Relational Space of Alignment, the meetings created emotional safety and supported patient autonomy and relational understanding; and (3) Involvement and Responsibility are deeply interconnected. Meaningful involvement occurred when accountability was shared between patients, relatives, and professionals.

Conclusion

V4M provided an effective model for integrating user involvement into transitional care by combining structural coordination with relational engagement. Patients and relatives felt acknowledged, informed, and reassured when professionals gained a clearer sense of shared responsibility. The study highlights that genuine user involvement depends on both emotional recognition and concrete accountability mechanisms across sectors.

Patient or Public Contribution

Older adults with multimorbidity and their relatives contributed to the development of the V4M intervention. In this study, patients and relatives participated as interviewees but were not involved in data analysis or manuscript preparation.

背景:患有多种疾病的老年人通常在医院、初级保健和市政服务之间经历零散的过渡护理。不充分的沟通和有限的用户参与会损害安全性、满意度和连续性。为了应对这些挑战,开发了一种结构化的跨部门干预,即虚拟四方会议(V4M),以加强患者和家庭对出院计划的参与。目的:探讨多病老年人及其亲属通过V4M参与过渡性照护的情况。方法:采用定性解释学设计。11例患者(65岁以上)及其家属在V4M术后立即和出院后14天再次参加了半结构化访谈。数据分析采用了Braun和Clarke在伽达美尔解释学框架内的反身性主题分析。结果:出现了三个主题:(1)系统之间的桥梁。V4M通过共享对话减少了碎片,提高了协调性;(2)关系空间的一致性,会议创造了情感安全,支持患者自主和关系理解;(3)参与和责任是紧密相连的。当病人、家属和专业人员共同承担责任时,就会产生有意义的参与。结论:V4M通过结构协调与关系参与相结合,为过渡性护理整合用户介入提供了有效的模型。当专业人员获得更清晰的共同责任意识时,患者和家属感到被认可、知情和放心。该研究强调,真正的用户参与取决于跨部门的情感认可和具体问责机制。患者或公众贡献:患有多种疾病的老年人及其亲属为V4M干预的发展做出了贡献。在本研究中,患者和亲属作为访谈对象参与,但不参与数据分析和稿件准备。
{"title":"User Involvement in Transition Care in Virtual 4-Party Meetings: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Ditte Høgsgaard,&nbsp;Janet Froulund Jensen,&nbsp;Heidi Myglegård Andersen","doi":"10.1111/hex.70566","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hex.70566","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Older adults with multimorbidity often experience fragmented transitional care between the hospital, primary care, and municipal services. Insufficient communication and limited user involvement can compromise safety, satisfaction, and continuity. To address these challenges, a structured cross-sectoral intervention, the Virtual 4-Party Meeting (V4M), was developed to enhance patient and family involvement in discharge planning.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Aim</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To explore how older adults with multimorbidity and their relatives experienced involvement in transitional care through V4M.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A qualitative hermeneutic design was applied. Eleven patients ( + 65 years) and their relatives participated in semi-structured interviews immediately after V4M and again 14 days post-discharge. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis within a Gadamerian hermeneutic framework.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Three themes emerged: (1) Bridges between Systems. V4M reduced fragmentation and improved coordination through shared dialog; (2) A Relational Space of Alignment, the meetings created emotional safety and supported patient autonomy and relational understanding; and (3) Involvement and Responsibility are deeply interconnected. Meaningful involvement occurred when accountability was shared between patients, relatives, and professionals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>V4M provided an effective model for integrating user involvement into transitional care by combining structural coordination with relational engagement. Patients and relatives felt acknowledged, informed, and reassured when professionals gained a clearer sense of shared responsibility. The study highlights that genuine user involvement depends on both emotional recognition and concrete accountability mechanisms across sectors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Older adults with multimorbidity and their relatives contributed to the development of the V4M intervention. In this study, patients and relatives participated as interviewees but were not involved in data analysis or manuscript preparation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12831168/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Health Expectations
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1