首页 > 最新文献

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Editorial: Maternal-fetal medicine: old foes and new weapons. 社论:母胎医学:老对手与新武器。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000933
Martha Rode, Mark Boddy, Charlotte Conturie
{"title":"Editorial: Maternal-fetal medicine: old foes and new weapons.","authors":"Martha Rode, Mark Boddy, Charlotte Conturie","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000933","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000933","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"36 2","pages":"65-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage. 评估氨甲环酸在预防和治疗产科出血方面的作用。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000935
John J Kowalczyk, Maurizio Cecconi, Alexander J Butwick

Purpose of review: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjunct to treat and prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We provide an overview of TXA, including its pharmacology, key findings of randomized trials and observational studies, and critical patient safety information.

Recent findings: Pharmacokinetic data indicate that TXA infusions result in peak plasma concentration within 3 min (range: 1-6.6 min). Ex-vivo pharmacodynamic data suggest that low-dose TXA (5 mg/kg) inhibits maximum lysis for at least 1 h. In predominantly developing countries, TXA has demonstrated a 19% reduction in the risk of bleeding-related death among patients with PPH. Based on high-quality randomized trials, TXA prophylaxis does not effectively reduce the risk of PPH during vaginal delivery and is likely ineffective in reducing the PPH risk during cesarean delivery. TXA exposure does not increase the risk of maternal thrombotic events. Maternal deaths have occurred from accidental intrathecal TXA injection from look-alike medication errors.

Summary: TXA has shown promise as an important adjunct for PPH treatment, especially in low-resource settings. However, TXA is not recommended as PPH prophylaxis during vaginal or cesarean delivery. Patient safety initiatives should be prioritized to prevent maternal death from accidental intrathecal TXA injection.

综述目的:氨甲环酸(TXA)已成为治疗和预防产后出血(PPH)的一种很有前景的药理辅助药物。我们对氨甲环酸进行了概述,包括其药理学、随机试验和观察性研究的主要结果以及重要的患者安全信息:药代动力学数据表明,输注 TXA 可在 3 分钟内使血浆浓度达到峰值(范围:1-6.6 分钟)。体内外药效学数据表明,低剂量 TXA(5 毫克/千克)可抑制最大溶血量至少 1 小时。在以发展中国家为主的国家,TXA 可将 PPH 患者因出血而死亡的风险降低 19%。根据高质量的随机试验,TXA 预防性治疗不能有效降低阴道分娩时 PPH 的风险,也可能无法有效降低剖宫产时 PPH 的风险。暴露于 TXA 不会增加产妇血栓事件的风险。总结:TXA 作为治疗 PPH 的重要辅助药物已显示出前景,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中。但是,不建议在阴道分娩或剖宫产时将 TXA 用作 PPH 预防用药。应优先考虑患者安全措施,以防止意外鞘内注射 TXA 造成产妇死亡。
{"title":"Evaluating tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage.","authors":"John J Kowalczyk, Maurizio Cecconi, Alexander J Butwick","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000935","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjunct to treat and prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We provide an overview of TXA, including its pharmacology, key findings of randomized trials and observational studies, and critical patient safety information.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Pharmacokinetic data indicate that TXA infusions result in peak plasma concentration within 3 min (range: 1-6.6 min). Ex-vivo pharmacodynamic data suggest that low-dose TXA (5 mg/kg) inhibits maximum lysis for at least 1 h. In predominantly developing countries, TXA has demonstrated a 19% reduction in the risk of bleeding-related death among patients with PPH. Based on high-quality randomized trials, TXA prophylaxis does not effectively reduce the risk of PPH during vaginal delivery and is likely ineffective in reducing the PPH risk during cesarean delivery. TXA exposure does not increase the risk of maternal thrombotic events. Maternal deaths have occurred from accidental intrathecal TXA injection from look-alike medication errors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>TXA has shown promise as an important adjunct for PPH treatment, especially in low-resource settings. However, TXA is not recommended as PPH prophylaxis during vaginal or cesarean delivery. Patient safety initiatives should be prioritized to prevent maternal death from accidental intrathecal TXA injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental health conditions and contraception: current landscape, reproductive health and obstetric outcomes, and clinical guidance. 精神健康状况与避孕:现状、生殖健康和产科结果以及临床指导。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936
Hayley E Miller, Samantha L Kruger, Danielle M Panelli

Purpose of review: This review presents the epidemiology of mental health conditions among reproductive aged people, common adverse reproductive outcomes, the hormonal profile of contraception and its relationship with psychiatric outcomes, and updated information for clinicians providing contraceptive counselling for this population.

Recent findings: There is variability among contraceptive behaviours and patterns across those who have mental health conditions, impacting reproductive, psychiatric, and perinatal outcomes. The endocrinology of hormonal contraceptives is well understood, however, the impacts of steroidal hormones on mental health outcomes continue to be less understood. Overall, hormonal contraceptives are safe to use among those with mental health conditions, and among those using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Additional considerations are needed when prescribing contraception among people who may be at risk of poor adherence, who use certain classes of antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and who are <6 weeks postpartum.

Summary: Barriers to effective contraceptive use should be addressed and myths on negative psychiatric impacts of hormonal contraceptives should be dispelled. Healthcare clinicians should seek out opportunities to become proficient in contraception counselling to improve health outcomes among people with mental health conditions.

综述的目的:本综述介绍了育龄人群中精神健康状况的流行病学、常见的不良生殖后果、避孕的荷尔蒙特征及其与精神疾病后果的关系,以及为该人群提供避孕咨询的临床医生的最新信息:最近的研究结果:患有精神疾病的人群的避孕行为和模式存在差异,对生殖、精神和围产期结果产生影响。荷尔蒙避孕药的内分泌学已为人们所熟知,但类固醇荷尔蒙对心理健康结果的影响却仍然鲜为人知。总体而言,在患有精神疾病的人群中,以及在使用选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂和血清素去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂的人群中,使用激素避孕药是安全的。总结:应消除有效避孕的障碍,并消除激素避孕药物对精神疾病负面影响的误解。医疗保健临床医生应寻找机会,熟练掌握避孕咨询技巧,以改善精神疾病患者的健康状况。
{"title":"Mental health conditions and contraception: current landscape, reproductive health and obstetric outcomes, and clinical guidance.","authors":"Hayley E Miller, Samantha L Kruger, Danielle M Panelli","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review presents the epidemiology of mental health conditions among reproductive aged people, common adverse reproductive outcomes, the hormonal profile of contraception and its relationship with psychiatric outcomes, and updated information for clinicians providing contraceptive counselling for this population.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is variability among contraceptive behaviours and patterns across those who have mental health conditions, impacting reproductive, psychiatric, and perinatal outcomes. The endocrinology of hormonal contraceptives is well understood, however, the impacts of steroidal hormones on mental health outcomes continue to be less understood. Overall, hormonal contraceptives are safe to use among those with mental health conditions, and among those using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Additional considerations are needed when prescribing contraception among people who may be at risk of poor adherence, who use certain classes of antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and who are <6 weeks postpartum.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Barriers to effective contraceptive use should be addressed and myths on negative psychiatric impacts of hormonal contraceptives should be dispelled. Healthcare clinicians should seek out opportunities to become proficient in contraception counselling to improve health outcomes among people with mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Update on syphilis in pregnancy: marrying basic science advances and clinical perseverance to solve an ancient public health problem. 妊娠期梅毒的最新进展:将基础科学的进步与临床实践的坚持相结合,解决一个古老的公共卫生问题。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000939
Emily H Adhikari

Purpose of review: While the clinical disease of syphilis, its consequences in pregnancy, and its sensitivity to penicillin treatment have remained relatively unchanged for a century or more, new technologies and basic discoveries in syphilis research have translated into tangible advances in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. The purpose of this review is to help the reader understand some of the recent relevant scientific publications on syphilis and its causative organism in a clinical obstetric context.

Recent findings: Rates of adult and congenital syphilis have risen dramatically in the last decade despite public health efforts. Penicillin shortages and lack of screening or adequate treatment have all contributed to global disease burden. Advances in genomic and microbiological characterization of this spirochete have led to new developments in serologic and molecular diagnosis as well as evaluation of potential vaccine candidates. Until a syphilis vaccine is available, substance use disorders and lack of screening in pregnancy are associated with increased congenital syphilis, and these challenges will require novel solutions to fully address this public health crisis.

Summary: Addressing the burden of congenital syphilis demands that obstetricians stay well informed of new tools and resources for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of syphilis now and in the future.

回顾的目的:一个多世纪以来,梅毒的临床疾病、对妊娠的影响以及对青霉素治疗的敏感性都相对保持不变,但梅毒研究领域的新技术和基础发现却在临床诊断、治疗和预防方面取得了切实进展。本综述旨在帮助读者了解最近发表的一些有关梅毒及其致病菌的科学文献,以及临床产科方面的最新研究成果:最近的研究结果:尽管公共卫生部门做出了努力,但在过去十年中,成人梅毒和先天性梅毒的发病率急剧上升。青霉素短缺、缺乏筛查或适当治疗都加重了全球疾病负担。梅毒螺旋体的基因组学和微生物学特征研究取得了进展,从而推动了血清学和分子诊断以及潜在候选疫苗评估的新发展。在梅毒疫苗问世之前,药物使用障碍和孕期缺乏筛查与先天性梅毒的增加有关,这些挑战需要新的解决方案来全面解决这一公共卫生危机。摘要:要解决先天性梅毒的负担问题,产科医生就必须充分了解现在和将来诊断、治疗和预防梅毒的新工具和新资源。
{"title":"Update on syphilis in pregnancy: marrying basic science advances and clinical perseverance to solve an ancient public health problem.","authors":"Emily H Adhikari","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000939","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While the clinical disease of syphilis, its consequences in pregnancy, and its sensitivity to penicillin treatment have remained relatively unchanged for a century or more, new technologies and basic discoveries in syphilis research have translated into tangible advances in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. The purpose of this review is to help the reader understand some of the recent relevant scientific publications on syphilis and its causative organism in a clinical obstetric context.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Rates of adult and congenital syphilis have risen dramatically in the last decade despite public health efforts. Penicillin shortages and lack of screening or adequate treatment have all contributed to global disease burden. Advances in genomic and microbiological characterization of this spirochete have led to new developments in serologic and molecular diagnosis as well as evaluation of potential vaccine candidates. Until a syphilis vaccine is available, substance use disorders and lack of screening in pregnancy are associated with increased congenital syphilis, and these challenges will require novel solutions to fully address this public health crisis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Addressing the burden of congenital syphilis demands that obstetricians stay well informed of new tools and resources for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of syphilis now and in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139418658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Routine screening for gestational diabetes: a review. 妊娠糖尿病的常规筛查:综述。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940
Minhazur R Sarker, Gladys A Ramos

Purpose of review: Rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) throughout the world continue to increase associated with the increasing rates of obesity. Given this epidemiologic burden, the importance of proper screening, diagnosis, and management cannot be understated. This review focuses on the current screening guidelines utilized throughout the world and new data recently published regarding the most optimal screening techniques and future directions for research.

Recent findings: Despite unanimous opinion that GDM warrants screening, the optimal screening regimen remains controversial. Notably, in the United States per the consensus recommendation by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, a 2-step screening approach is often used. Recently, there have been multiple studies published that have compared the 1-step and 2-step screening process with respect to GDM incidence and perinatal outcomes. These new findings are summarized below.

Summary: Utilization of the 1-step screening as opposed to the 2-step screening results in an increased diagnosis of GDM without significant population level benefit in outcomes. However, these studies remain underpowered to allow for meaningful comparison of outcomes in those diagnosed with GDM.

审查目的:随着肥胖率的上升,全世界妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的发病率也在持续上升。鉴于这种流行病学负担,正确筛查、诊断和管理的重要性不容低估。这篇综述主要介绍了目前全世界使用的筛查指南,以及最近发表的关于最佳筛查技术和未来研究方向的新数据:尽管一致认为 GDM 需要筛查,但最佳筛查方案仍存在争议。值得注意的是,在美国,根据美国妇产科学会和母胎医学会的一致建议,通常采用两步筛查法。最近,有多项研究就 GDM 发病率和围产期结局对一步筛查法和两步筛查法进行了比较。总结:与两步筛查法相比,使用一步筛查法可增加 GDM 的诊断率,但对人群的预后没有明显的益处。然而,这些研究的研究力量仍然不足,无法对确诊的 GDM 患者的预后进行有意义的比较。
{"title":"Routine screening for gestational diabetes: a review.","authors":"Minhazur R Sarker, Gladys A Ramos","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) throughout the world continue to increase associated with the increasing rates of obesity. Given this epidemiologic burden, the importance of proper screening, diagnosis, and management cannot be understated. This review focuses on the current screening guidelines utilized throughout the world and new data recently published regarding the most optimal screening techniques and future directions for research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite unanimous opinion that GDM warrants screening, the optimal screening regimen remains controversial. Notably, in the United States per the consensus recommendation by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, a 2-step screening approach is often used. Recently, there have been multiple studies published that have compared the 1-step and 2-step screening process with respect to GDM incidence and perinatal outcomes. These new findings are summarized below.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Utilization of the 1-step screening as opposed to the 2-step screening results in an increased diagnosis of GDM without significant population level benefit in outcomes. However, these studies remain underpowered to allow for meaningful comparison of outcomes in those diagnosed with GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139522325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A review of racial disparities in ovarian cancer and clinical trials. 卵巢癌种族差异与临床试验综述。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923
Maryam Ali, Krishnansu S Tewari

Purpose of review: Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in mortality among women with cancer and accounts for more death compared to any other gynecological cancers. This review summarizes the most recent literature on disparities in ovarian cancer as well as within recent clinical trials.

Recent findings: Recent studies have identified a notable disparity in genetic testing utilization, disease stage at the time of diagnosis, and adherence to treatment guidelines between Black women and their White counterparts, ultimately leading to increased mortality rates among Black women from ovarian cancer. Additionally, there is an underreporting of race in clinical trials and those that do report race demonstrate significant racial disparities within trial participants with the majority of participants being White.

Summary: It is imperative that we address the significant racial disparities within ovarian cancer and clinical trials to establish a framework of equitable healthcare provision. Multiple determinants, such as implicit bias, provider mistrust, accessibility hurdles, and socioeconomic influences, appear to contribute to the current disparities faced by women of color. Further investigation is warranted, encompassing a deeper understanding of diverse patient perspectives and identifying barriers to receiving optimal care and participating in clinical trials.

审查目的:卵巢癌在妇女癌症死亡率中排名第五,与其他妇科癌症相比,卵巢癌造成的死亡人数更多。本综述总结了有关卵巢癌差异以及近期临床试验的最新文献:最近的研究发现,黑人妇女与白人妇女在基因检测的使用、诊断时的疾病分期以及治疗指南的遵守方面存在明显差异,最终导致黑人妇女卵巢癌死亡率上升。此外,临床试验中的种族报告不足,而那些报告了种族的临床试验表明,试验参与者中存在显著的种族差异,大多数参与者为白人。摘要:我们必须解决卵巢癌和临床试验中存在的显著种族差异,以建立公平的医疗保健服务框架。多种决定因素,如隐性偏见、提供者的不信任、可及性障碍和社会经济影响,似乎都是造成有色人种妇女目前所面临差距的原因。有必要开展进一步调查,深入了解不同患者的观点,并找出获得最佳治疗和参与临床试验的障碍。
{"title":"A review of racial disparities in ovarian cancer and clinical trials.","authors":"Maryam Ali, Krishnansu S Tewari","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in mortality among women with cancer and accounts for more death compared to any other gynecological cancers. This review summarizes the most recent literature on disparities in ovarian cancer as well as within recent clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have identified a notable disparity in genetic testing utilization, disease stage at the time of diagnosis, and adherence to treatment guidelines between Black women and their White counterparts, ultimately leading to increased mortality rates among Black women from ovarian cancer. Additionally, there is an underreporting of race in clinical trials and those that do report race demonstrate significant racial disparities within trial participants with the majority of participants being White.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>It is imperative that we address the significant racial disparities within ovarian cancer and clinical trials to establish a framework of equitable healthcare provision. Multiple determinants, such as implicit bias, provider mistrust, accessibility hurdles, and socioeconomic influences, appear to contribute to the current disparities faced by women of color. Further investigation is warranted, encompassing a deeper understanding of diverse patient perspectives and identifying barriers to receiving optimal care and participating in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"36 1","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Latest advances in immuno-oncology for endometrial cancer: single-agent and combination regimens. 子宫内膜癌症免疫遗传学的最新进展:单药和联合用药方案。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000917
Michael Richardson, Dana M Chase

Purpose of review: The scope of immuno-oncology in endometrial cancer has changed rapidly in the last several years, requiring up-to-date knowledge for those who treat these patients.

Recent findings: This article will focus on molecular profiling, recent trials, and FDA approvals of targeted immuno-oncology medications in endometrial cancer. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or with combination treatment.

Summary: The publication of the TCGA has led to significant focus on molecular subgroupings into POLEm, MMRd, NSMP, and p53m groups. For those patients with MMRd vs. MMRp tumors, there are indications for single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors with dostarlimab or pembrolizumab. For those with MMRp tumors, the addition of lenvatinib to pembrolizumab has proven clinical benefit. The recent publication of the RUBY and NRG-GY018 trials have shown clinical benefit in both subgroups with addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy. Now there is approval for use of dostarlimab in frontline chemotherapy and maintenance for advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer. Several upcoming trials investigating molecular subgroups from the TCGA are eagerly anticipated.

综述目的:在过去几年中,癌症子宫内膜免疫遗传学的范围发生了迅速变化,这就要求这些患者的治疗人员掌握最新知识。最近的发现:本文将重点介绍癌症子宫内膜靶向免疫生态学药物的分子图谱、最近的试验和FDA批准。其中包括单独或联合治疗的免疫检查点抑制剂。综述:TCGA的发表引起了人们对POLEm、MMRd、NSMP和p53m组分子亚组的关注。对于那些患有MMRd和MMRp肿瘤的患者,有迹象表明使用多司他利单抗或pembrolizumab的单剂免疫检查点抑制剂。对于MMRp肿瘤患者,在pembrolizumab中添加乐伐替尼已被证明具有临床益处。最近发表的RUBY和NRG-GY018试验表明,在基于铂的化疗中添加免疫检查点抑制剂对这两个亚组都有临床益处。目前,多司他利单抗已被批准用于晚期或复发性癌症的一线化疗和维持。人们热切期待着即将进行的几项研究TCGA分子亚群的试验。
{"title":"Latest advances in immuno-oncology for endometrial cancer: single-agent and combination regimens.","authors":"Michael Richardson, Dana M Chase","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000917","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The scope of immuno-oncology in endometrial cancer has changed rapidly in the last several years, requiring up-to-date knowledge for those who treat these patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This article will focus on molecular profiling, recent trials, and FDA approvals of targeted immuno-oncology medications in endometrial cancer. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or with combination treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The publication of the TCGA has led to significant focus on molecular subgroupings into POLEm, MMRd, NSMP, and p53m groups. For those patients with MMRd vs. MMRp tumors, there are indications for single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors with dostarlimab or pembrolizumab. For those with MMRp tumors, the addition of lenvatinib to pembrolizumab has proven clinical benefit. The recent publication of the RUBY and NRG-GY018 trials have shown clinical benefit in both subgroups with addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy. Now there is approval for use of dostarlimab in frontline chemotherapy and maintenance for advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer. Several upcoming trials investigating molecular subgroups from the TCGA are eagerly anticipated.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41170610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reducing health disparities in endometrial cancer care in 2024. 2024年减少癌症子宫内膜护理的健康差异。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-25 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000924
Chelsea E Stewart, Andrea Nañez, Martins Ayoola-Adeola, Dana Chase

Purpose of review: To summarize the most recent publications explaining disparities among patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and identify areas of improvement.

Recent findings: Racial disparities in endometrial cancer care have been identified along the cancer continuum including risk, diagnosis, access to treatment, and overall survival. The mortality gap in endometrial cancer is one of the top five widest Black-White mortality gaps among all cancer diagnoses in the United States. Many publications have demonstrated that the disparities exist, the aim of this review is to identify actionable areas of improvement. To mitigate racial disparities, we must acknowledge that Black patients are at higher risk of high-risk subtypes of endometrial cancer, and their presentation can vary from what is considered typical for the most common type of endometrial cancer. We must address that practice recommendations for diagnosis may not be generalizable to all races and ethnicities, and that racism has an impact on how providers approach a work-up for Black vs. White patients. Finally, we must improve access to appropriate treatment by steadfastly adhering to recommended practice guidelines regardless of race/ethnicity and improving efforts to enroll a diverse patient population to clinical trials.

Summary: In this review, we sought to identify specific and actionable areas of improvement to reduce racial disparities in endometrial cancer care.

综述目的:总结解释癌症患者差异的最新出版物,并确定改善的领域。最近的研究结果:子宫内膜癌症护理中的种族差异已被确定为癌症连续体,包括风险、诊断、获得治疗的机会和总体生存率。子宫内膜癌症的死亡率差距是美国所有癌症诊断中最大的五大黑白死亡率差距之一。许多出版物已经证明存在差异,本次审查的目的是确定可采取行动的改进领域。为了缓解种族差异,我们必须承认黑人患者患癌症高风险亚型子宫内膜癌的风险更高,他们的表现可能与最常见的癌症子宫内膜癌不同。我们必须解决的问题是,诊断实践建议可能不适用于所有种族和族裔,种族主义对提供者如何为黑人和白人患者进行检查有影响。最后,我们必须通过坚定地遵守推荐的实践指南,无论种族/民族,并努力让不同的患者群体参与临床试验,来改善获得适当治疗的机会。摘要:在这篇综述中,我们试图确定具体和可行的改进领域,以减少子宫内膜癌症护理中的种族差异。
{"title":"Reducing health disparities in endometrial cancer care in 2024.","authors":"Chelsea E Stewart, Andrea Nañez, Martins Ayoola-Adeola, Dana Chase","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000924","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize the most recent publications explaining disparities among patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and identify areas of improvement.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Racial disparities in endometrial cancer care have been identified along the cancer continuum including risk, diagnosis, access to treatment, and overall survival. The mortality gap in endometrial cancer is one of the top five widest Black-White mortality gaps among all cancer diagnoses in the United States. Many publications have demonstrated that the disparities exist, the aim of this review is to identify actionable areas of improvement. To mitigate racial disparities, we must acknowledge that Black patients are at higher risk of high-risk subtypes of endometrial cancer, and their presentation can vary from what is considered typical for the most common type of endometrial cancer. We must address that practice recommendations for diagnosis may not be generalizable to all races and ethnicities, and that racism has an impact on how providers approach a work-up for Black vs. White patients. Finally, we must improve access to appropriate treatment by steadfastly adhering to recommended practice guidelines regardless of race/ethnicity and improving efforts to enroll a diverse patient population to clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this review, we sought to identify specific and actionable areas of improvement to reduce racial disparities in endometrial cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
New strategies for the management of triple-negative breast cancer. 治疗三阴性乳腺癌的新策略。
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-08 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000927
Fauzia Riaz

Purpose of review: This review highlights important changes in our understanding of triple-negative breast cancer. It highlights important novel approaches in treatment and reviews predicts potential challenges facing the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Recent findings: There is a clear shift away from chemotherapy-centric approaches to the treatment of breast cancer, and instead, a move towards incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other targeted therapies. There is a focus on understanding biomarkers and leveraging novel targets in drug development.

Summary: It is now standard of care to use neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy-chemotherapy in patients with Stage 1 and 2 breast cancers. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations when appropriate biomarkers are present (PD-L1) are standard first-line therapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are now a mainstay in the treatment of this disease. These findings have shifted the treatment paradigm of the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

综述的目的:本综述强调了我们对三阴性乳腺癌认识的重要变化。它强调了重要的新型治疗方法,并预测了三阴性乳腺癌治疗面临的潜在挑战:治疗乳腺癌的方法明显从以化疗为中心转变为以免疫检查点抑制剂、抗体药物共轭物和其他靶向疗法为中心。摘要:目前,对 1 期和 2 期乳腺癌患者采用新辅助免疫化疗联合疗法已成为标准治疗方法。如果存在适当的生物标志物(PD-L1),化疗-免疫疗法组合是转移性三阴性乳腺癌的标准一线疗法。抗体-药物共轭物目前已成为治疗这种疾病的主要药物。这些发现改变了三阴性乳腺癌的治疗模式。
{"title":"New strategies for the management of triple-negative breast cancer.","authors":"Fauzia Riaz","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000927","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review highlights important changes in our understanding of triple-negative breast cancer. It highlights important novel approaches in treatment and reviews predicts potential challenges facing the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is a clear shift away from chemotherapy-centric approaches to the treatment of breast cancer, and instead, a move towards incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other targeted therapies. There is a focus on understanding biomarkers and leveraging novel targets in drug development.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>It is now standard of care to use neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy-chemotherapy in patients with Stage 1 and 2 breast cancers. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations when appropriate biomarkers are present (PD-L1) are standard first-line therapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are now a mainstay in the treatment of this disease. These findings have shifted the treatment paradigm of the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"36 1","pages":"40-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetic risk assessment in breast and gynecologic malignancies- what's to know in 2024? 乳腺和妇科恶性肿瘤的遗传风险评估——2024年要知道什么?
IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000920
Daniella Kamara, Erica Silver, Mariana Niell-Swiller

Purpose of review: Hereditary cancer risk assessment and counseling have become integral in oncology care, especially in breast and gynecologic malignancies where genetic test results impact management. However, a large number of patients who could benefit from genetic testing are not getting tested. As such, genetic risk assessment and counseling methods have had to evolve to meet the needs of this expanding patient population.

Recent findings: "Mainstreaming" genetic testing is an initiative to incorporate genetic testing into routine cancer care in lieu of the traditional genetic counseling model to improve uptake of testing while minimizing expansion of genetic counselor and clinic resources. These models have performed well in various institutions demonstrating an improvement in clinical efficacy. However, missed opportunities from the preventive care standpoint, a core value of cancer genetics risk assessment, have become apparent. The focus of these models is on the patient's cancer diagnosis and comprehensive/familial genetic risk assessment is not often completed.

Summary: Identifying patients at an increased risk of cancer, even in the absence of a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, is important in tailoring screening and preventive measures. As we look to the future, we need to critically approach mainstreaming and determine how to reincorporate comprehensive genetic risk assessment into our models.

综述目的:遗传性癌症风险评估和咨询已成为肿瘤学护理的一部分,尤其是在遗传检测结果影响管理的乳腺和妇科恶性肿瘤中。然而,大量可能从基因检测中受益的患者没有接受检测。因此,基因风险评估和咨询方法必须不断发展,以满足不断扩大的患者群体的需求。最近的发现:“主流化”基因检测是一项将基因检测纳入癌症常规护理的举措,以取代传统的基因咨询模式,从而提高检测的接受率,同时最大限度地减少基因咨询师和诊所资源的扩展。这些模型在各种机构中表现良好,证明了临床疗效的提高。然而,从预防性护理的角度来看,癌症基因风险评估的核心价值,错失的机会已经变得显而易见。这些模型的重点是患者的癌症诊断,综合/家族遗传风险评估通常不完成。摘要:识别癌症风险增加的患者,即使在没有遗传性癌症易感性综合征的情况下,在制定筛查和预防措施方面也很重要。展望未来,我们需要认真对待主流化问题,并确定如何将全面的遗传风险评估重新纳入我们的模型。
{"title":"Genetic risk assessment in breast and gynecologic malignancies- what's to know in 2024?","authors":"Daniella Kamara, Erica Silver, Mariana Niell-Swiller","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000920","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hereditary cancer risk assessment and counseling have become integral in oncology care, especially in breast and gynecologic malignancies where genetic test results impact management. However, a large number of patients who could benefit from genetic testing are not getting tested. As such, genetic risk assessment and counseling methods have had to evolve to meet the needs of this expanding patient population.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>\"Mainstreaming\" genetic testing is an initiative to incorporate genetic testing into routine cancer care in lieu of the traditional genetic counseling model to improve uptake of testing while minimizing expansion of genetic counselor and clinic resources. These models have performed well in various institutions demonstrating an improvement in clinical efficacy. However, missed opportunities from the preventive care standpoint, a core value of cancer genetics risk assessment, have become apparent. The focus of these models is on the patient's cancer diagnosis and comprehensive/familial genetic risk assessment is not often completed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Identifying patients at an increased risk of cancer, even in the absence of a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, is important in tailoring screening and preventive measures. As we look to the future, we need to critically approach mainstreaming and determine how to reincorporate comprehensive genetic risk assessment into our models.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1