Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000933
Martha Rode, Mark Boddy, Charlotte Conturie
{"title":"Editorial: Maternal-fetal medicine: old foes and new weapons.","authors":"Martha Rode, Mark Boddy, Charlotte Conturie","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000933","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000933","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"36 2","pages":"65-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2023-12-26DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000935
John J Kowalczyk, Maurizio Cecconi, Alexander J Butwick
Purpose of review: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjunct to treat and prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We provide an overview of TXA, including its pharmacology, key findings of randomized trials and observational studies, and critical patient safety information.
Recent findings: Pharmacokinetic data indicate that TXA infusions result in peak plasma concentration within 3 min (range: 1-6.6 min). Ex-vivo pharmacodynamic data suggest that low-dose TXA (5 mg/kg) inhibits maximum lysis for at least 1 h. In predominantly developing countries, TXA has demonstrated a 19% reduction in the risk of bleeding-related death among patients with PPH. Based on high-quality randomized trials, TXA prophylaxis does not effectively reduce the risk of PPH during vaginal delivery and is likely ineffective in reducing the PPH risk during cesarean delivery. TXA exposure does not increase the risk of maternal thrombotic events. Maternal deaths have occurred from accidental intrathecal TXA injection from look-alike medication errors.
Summary: TXA has shown promise as an important adjunct for PPH treatment, especially in low-resource settings. However, TXA is not recommended as PPH prophylaxis during vaginal or cesarean delivery. Patient safety initiatives should be prioritized to prevent maternal death from accidental intrathecal TXA injection.
{"title":"Evaluating tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage.","authors":"John J Kowalczyk, Maurizio Cecconi, Alexander J Butwick","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000935","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000935","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjunct to treat and prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). We provide an overview of TXA, including its pharmacology, key findings of randomized trials and observational studies, and critical patient safety information.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Pharmacokinetic data indicate that TXA infusions result in peak plasma concentration within 3 min (range: 1-6.6 min). Ex-vivo pharmacodynamic data suggest that low-dose TXA (5 mg/kg) inhibits maximum lysis for at least 1 h. In predominantly developing countries, TXA has demonstrated a 19% reduction in the risk of bleeding-related death among patients with PPH. Based on high-quality randomized trials, TXA prophylaxis does not effectively reduce the risk of PPH during vaginal delivery and is likely ineffective in reducing the PPH risk during cesarean delivery. TXA exposure does not increase the risk of maternal thrombotic events. Maternal deaths have occurred from accidental intrathecal TXA injection from look-alike medication errors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>TXA has shown promise as an important adjunct for PPH treatment, especially in low-resource settings. However, TXA is not recommended as PPH prophylaxis during vaginal or cesarean delivery. Patient safety initiatives should be prioritized to prevent maternal death from accidental intrathecal TXA injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-01-02DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936
Hayley E Miller, Samantha L Kruger, Danielle M Panelli
Purpose of review: This review presents the epidemiology of mental health conditions among reproductive aged people, common adverse reproductive outcomes, the hormonal profile of contraception and its relationship with psychiatric outcomes, and updated information for clinicians providing contraceptive counselling for this population.
Recent findings: There is variability among contraceptive behaviours and patterns across those who have mental health conditions, impacting reproductive, psychiatric, and perinatal outcomes. The endocrinology of hormonal contraceptives is well understood, however, the impacts of steroidal hormones on mental health outcomes continue to be less understood. Overall, hormonal contraceptives are safe to use among those with mental health conditions, and among those using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Additional considerations are needed when prescribing contraception among people who may be at risk of poor adherence, who use certain classes of antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and who are <6 weeks postpartum.
Summary: Barriers to effective contraceptive use should be addressed and myths on negative psychiatric impacts of hormonal contraceptives should be dispelled. Healthcare clinicians should seek out opportunities to become proficient in contraception counselling to improve health outcomes among people with mental health conditions.
{"title":"Mental health conditions and contraception: current landscape, reproductive health and obstetric outcomes, and clinical guidance.","authors":"Hayley E Miller, Samantha L Kruger, Danielle M Panelli","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000936","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review presents the epidemiology of mental health conditions among reproductive aged people, common adverse reproductive outcomes, the hormonal profile of contraception and its relationship with psychiatric outcomes, and updated information for clinicians providing contraceptive counselling for this population.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is variability among contraceptive behaviours and patterns across those who have mental health conditions, impacting reproductive, psychiatric, and perinatal outcomes. The endocrinology of hormonal contraceptives is well understood, however, the impacts of steroidal hormones on mental health outcomes continue to be less understood. Overall, hormonal contraceptives are safe to use among those with mental health conditions, and among those using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Additional considerations are needed when prescribing contraception among people who may be at risk of poor adherence, who use certain classes of antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and who are <6 weeks postpartum.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Barriers to effective contraceptive use should be addressed and myths on negative psychiatric impacts of hormonal contraceptives should be dispelled. Healthcare clinicians should seek out opportunities to become proficient in contraception counselling to improve health outcomes among people with mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-01-11DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000939
Emily H Adhikari
Purpose of review: While the clinical disease of syphilis, its consequences in pregnancy, and its sensitivity to penicillin treatment have remained relatively unchanged for a century or more, new technologies and basic discoveries in syphilis research have translated into tangible advances in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. The purpose of this review is to help the reader understand some of the recent relevant scientific publications on syphilis and its causative organism in a clinical obstetric context.
Recent findings: Rates of adult and congenital syphilis have risen dramatically in the last decade despite public health efforts. Penicillin shortages and lack of screening or adequate treatment have all contributed to global disease burden. Advances in genomic and microbiological characterization of this spirochete have led to new developments in serologic and molecular diagnosis as well as evaluation of potential vaccine candidates. Until a syphilis vaccine is available, substance use disorders and lack of screening in pregnancy are associated with increased congenital syphilis, and these challenges will require novel solutions to fully address this public health crisis.
Summary: Addressing the burden of congenital syphilis demands that obstetricians stay well informed of new tools and resources for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of syphilis now and in the future.
{"title":"Update on syphilis in pregnancy: marrying basic science advances and clinical perseverance to solve an ancient public health problem.","authors":"Emily H Adhikari","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000939","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000939","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While the clinical disease of syphilis, its consequences in pregnancy, and its sensitivity to penicillin treatment have remained relatively unchanged for a century or more, new technologies and basic discoveries in syphilis research have translated into tangible advances in clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. The purpose of this review is to help the reader understand some of the recent relevant scientific publications on syphilis and its causative organism in a clinical obstetric context.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Rates of adult and congenital syphilis have risen dramatically in the last decade despite public health efforts. Penicillin shortages and lack of screening or adequate treatment have all contributed to global disease burden. Advances in genomic and microbiological characterization of this spirochete have led to new developments in serologic and molecular diagnosis as well as evaluation of potential vaccine candidates. Until a syphilis vaccine is available, substance use disorders and lack of screening in pregnancy are associated with increased congenital syphilis, and these challenges will require novel solutions to fully address this public health crisis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Addressing the burden of congenital syphilis demands that obstetricians stay well informed of new tools and resources for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of syphilis now and in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139418658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01Epub Date: 2024-01-15DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940
Minhazur R Sarker, Gladys A Ramos
Purpose of review: Rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) throughout the world continue to increase associated with the increasing rates of obesity. Given this epidemiologic burden, the importance of proper screening, diagnosis, and management cannot be understated. This review focuses on the current screening guidelines utilized throughout the world and new data recently published regarding the most optimal screening techniques and future directions for research.
Recent findings: Despite unanimous opinion that GDM warrants screening, the optimal screening regimen remains controversial. Notably, in the United States per the consensus recommendation by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, a 2-step screening approach is often used. Recently, there have been multiple studies published that have compared the 1-step and 2-step screening process with respect to GDM incidence and perinatal outcomes. These new findings are summarized below.
Summary: Utilization of the 1-step screening as opposed to the 2-step screening results in an increased diagnosis of GDM without significant population level benefit in outcomes. However, these studies remain underpowered to allow for meaningful comparison of outcomes in those diagnosed with GDM.
{"title":"Routine screening for gestational diabetes: a review.","authors":"Minhazur R Sarker, Gladys A Ramos","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000940","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) throughout the world continue to increase associated with the increasing rates of obesity. Given this epidemiologic burden, the importance of proper screening, diagnosis, and management cannot be understated. This review focuses on the current screening guidelines utilized throughout the world and new data recently published regarding the most optimal screening techniques and future directions for research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Despite unanimous opinion that GDM warrants screening, the optimal screening regimen remains controversial. Notably, in the United States per the consensus recommendation by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, a 2-step screening approach is often used. Recently, there have been multiple studies published that have compared the 1-step and 2-step screening process with respect to GDM incidence and perinatal outcomes. These new findings are summarized below.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Utilization of the 1-step screening as opposed to the 2-step screening results in an increased diagnosis of GDM without significant population level benefit in outcomes. However, these studies remain underpowered to allow for meaningful comparison of outcomes in those diagnosed with GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139522325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-10-19DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923
Maryam Ali, Krishnansu S Tewari
Purpose of review: Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in mortality among women with cancer and accounts for more death compared to any other gynecological cancers. This review summarizes the most recent literature on disparities in ovarian cancer as well as within recent clinical trials.
Recent findings: Recent studies have identified a notable disparity in genetic testing utilization, disease stage at the time of diagnosis, and adherence to treatment guidelines between Black women and their White counterparts, ultimately leading to increased mortality rates among Black women from ovarian cancer. Additionally, there is an underreporting of race in clinical trials and those that do report race demonstrate significant racial disparities within trial participants with the majority of participants being White.
Summary: It is imperative that we address the significant racial disparities within ovarian cancer and clinical trials to establish a framework of equitable healthcare provision. Multiple determinants, such as implicit bias, provider mistrust, accessibility hurdles, and socioeconomic influences, appear to contribute to the current disparities faced by women of color. Further investigation is warranted, encompassing a deeper understanding of diverse patient perspectives and identifying barriers to receiving optimal care and participating in clinical trials.
{"title":"A review of racial disparities in ovarian cancer and clinical trials.","authors":"Maryam Ali, Krishnansu S Tewari","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in mortality among women with cancer and accounts for more death compared to any other gynecological cancers. This review summarizes the most recent literature on disparities in ovarian cancer as well as within recent clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have identified a notable disparity in genetic testing utilization, disease stage at the time of diagnosis, and adherence to treatment guidelines between Black women and their White counterparts, ultimately leading to increased mortality rates among Black women from ovarian cancer. Additionally, there is an underreporting of race in clinical trials and those that do report race demonstrate significant racial disparities within trial participants with the majority of participants being White.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>It is imperative that we address the significant racial disparities within ovarian cancer and clinical trials to establish a framework of equitable healthcare provision. Multiple determinants, such as implicit bias, provider mistrust, accessibility hurdles, and socioeconomic influences, appear to contribute to the current disparities faced by women of color. Further investigation is warranted, encompassing a deeper understanding of diverse patient perspectives and identifying barriers to receiving optimal care and participating in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"36 1","pages":"23-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-09-28DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000917
Michael Richardson, Dana M Chase
Purpose of review: The scope of immuno-oncology in endometrial cancer has changed rapidly in the last several years, requiring up-to-date knowledge for those who treat these patients.
Recent findings: This article will focus on molecular profiling, recent trials, and FDA approvals of targeted immuno-oncology medications in endometrial cancer. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or with combination treatment.
Summary: The publication of the TCGA has led to significant focus on molecular subgroupings into POLEm, MMRd, NSMP, and p53m groups. For those patients with MMRd vs. MMRp tumors, there are indications for single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors with dostarlimab or pembrolizumab. For those with MMRp tumors, the addition of lenvatinib to pembrolizumab has proven clinical benefit. The recent publication of the RUBY and NRG-GY018 trials have shown clinical benefit in both subgroups with addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy. Now there is approval for use of dostarlimab in frontline chemotherapy and maintenance for advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer. Several upcoming trials investigating molecular subgroups from the TCGA are eagerly anticipated.
{"title":"Latest advances in immuno-oncology for endometrial cancer: single-agent and combination regimens.","authors":"Michael Richardson, Dana M Chase","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000917","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The scope of immuno-oncology in endometrial cancer has changed rapidly in the last several years, requiring up-to-date knowledge for those who treat these patients.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This article will focus on molecular profiling, recent trials, and FDA approvals of targeted immuno-oncology medications in endometrial cancer. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or with combination treatment.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The publication of the TCGA has led to significant focus on molecular subgroupings into POLEm, MMRd, NSMP, and p53m groups. For those patients with MMRd vs. MMRp tumors, there are indications for single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors with dostarlimab or pembrolizumab. For those with MMRp tumors, the addition of lenvatinib to pembrolizumab has proven clinical benefit. The recent publication of the RUBY and NRG-GY018 trials have shown clinical benefit in both subgroups with addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy. Now there is approval for use of dostarlimab in frontline chemotherapy and maintenance for advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer. Several upcoming trials investigating molecular subgroups from the TCGA are eagerly anticipated.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41170610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-10-25DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000924
Chelsea E Stewart, Andrea Nañez, Martins Ayoola-Adeola, Dana Chase
Purpose of review: To summarize the most recent publications explaining disparities among patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and identify areas of improvement.
Recent findings: Racial disparities in endometrial cancer care have been identified along the cancer continuum including risk, diagnosis, access to treatment, and overall survival. The mortality gap in endometrial cancer is one of the top five widest Black-White mortality gaps among all cancer diagnoses in the United States. Many publications have demonstrated that the disparities exist, the aim of this review is to identify actionable areas of improvement. To mitigate racial disparities, we must acknowledge that Black patients are at higher risk of high-risk subtypes of endometrial cancer, and their presentation can vary from what is considered typical for the most common type of endometrial cancer. We must address that practice recommendations for diagnosis may not be generalizable to all races and ethnicities, and that racism has an impact on how providers approach a work-up for Black vs. White patients. Finally, we must improve access to appropriate treatment by steadfastly adhering to recommended practice guidelines regardless of race/ethnicity and improving efforts to enroll a diverse patient population to clinical trials.
Summary: In this review, we sought to identify specific and actionable areas of improvement to reduce racial disparities in endometrial cancer care.
{"title":"Reducing health disparities in endometrial cancer care in 2024.","authors":"Chelsea E Stewart, Andrea Nañez, Martins Ayoola-Adeola, Dana Chase","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000924","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To summarize the most recent publications explaining disparities among patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and identify areas of improvement.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Racial disparities in endometrial cancer care have been identified along the cancer continuum including risk, diagnosis, access to treatment, and overall survival. The mortality gap in endometrial cancer is one of the top five widest Black-White mortality gaps among all cancer diagnoses in the United States. Many publications have demonstrated that the disparities exist, the aim of this review is to identify actionable areas of improvement. To mitigate racial disparities, we must acknowledge that Black patients are at higher risk of high-risk subtypes of endometrial cancer, and their presentation can vary from what is considered typical for the most common type of endometrial cancer. We must address that practice recommendations for diagnosis may not be generalizable to all races and ethnicities, and that racism has an impact on how providers approach a work-up for Black vs. White patients. Finally, we must improve access to appropriate treatment by steadfastly adhering to recommended practice guidelines regardless of race/ethnicity and improving efforts to enroll a diverse patient population to clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this review, we sought to identify specific and actionable areas of improvement to reduce racial disparities in endometrial cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"18-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10883863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2023-12-08DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000927
Fauzia Riaz
Purpose of review: This review highlights important changes in our understanding of triple-negative breast cancer. It highlights important novel approaches in treatment and reviews predicts potential challenges facing the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.
Recent findings: There is a clear shift away from chemotherapy-centric approaches to the treatment of breast cancer, and instead, a move towards incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other targeted therapies. There is a focus on understanding biomarkers and leveraging novel targets in drug development.
Summary: It is now standard of care to use neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy-chemotherapy in patients with Stage 1 and 2 breast cancers. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations when appropriate biomarkers are present (PD-L1) are standard first-line therapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are now a mainstay in the treatment of this disease. These findings have shifted the treatment paradigm of the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.
{"title":"New strategies for the management of triple-negative breast cancer.","authors":"Fauzia Riaz","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000927","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review highlights important changes in our understanding of triple-negative breast cancer. It highlights important novel approaches in treatment and reviews predicts potential challenges facing the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There is a clear shift away from chemotherapy-centric approaches to the treatment of breast cancer, and instead, a move towards incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other targeted therapies. There is a focus on understanding biomarkers and leveraging novel targets in drug development.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>It is now standard of care to use neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy-chemotherapy in patients with Stage 1 and 2 breast cancers. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations when appropriate biomarkers are present (PD-L1) are standard first-line therapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are now a mainstay in the treatment of this disease. These findings have shifted the treatment paradigm of the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"36 1","pages":"40-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Hereditary cancer risk assessment and counseling have become integral in oncology care, especially in breast and gynecologic malignancies where genetic test results impact management. However, a large number of patients who could benefit from genetic testing are not getting tested. As such, genetic risk assessment and counseling methods have had to evolve to meet the needs of this expanding patient population.
Recent findings: "Mainstreaming" genetic testing is an initiative to incorporate genetic testing into routine cancer care in lieu of the traditional genetic counseling model to improve uptake of testing while minimizing expansion of genetic counselor and clinic resources. These models have performed well in various institutions demonstrating an improvement in clinical efficacy. However, missed opportunities from the preventive care standpoint, a core value of cancer genetics risk assessment, have become apparent. The focus of these models is on the patient's cancer diagnosis and comprehensive/familial genetic risk assessment is not often completed.
Summary: Identifying patients at an increased risk of cancer, even in the absence of a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, is important in tailoring screening and preventive measures. As we look to the future, we need to critically approach mainstreaming and determine how to reincorporate comprehensive genetic risk assessment into our models.
{"title":"Genetic risk assessment in breast and gynecologic malignancies- what's to know in 2024?","authors":"Daniella Kamara, Erica Silver, Mariana Niell-Swiller","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000920","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000000920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hereditary cancer risk assessment and counseling have become integral in oncology care, especially in breast and gynecologic malignancies where genetic test results impact management. However, a large number of patients who could benefit from genetic testing are not getting tested. As such, genetic risk assessment and counseling methods have had to evolve to meet the needs of this expanding patient population.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>\"Mainstreaming\" genetic testing is an initiative to incorporate genetic testing into routine cancer care in lieu of the traditional genetic counseling model to improve uptake of testing while minimizing expansion of genetic counselor and clinic resources. These models have performed well in various institutions demonstrating an improvement in clinical efficacy. However, missed opportunities from the preventive care standpoint, a core value of cancer genetics risk assessment, have become apparent. The focus of these models is on the patient's cancer diagnosis and comprehensive/familial genetic risk assessment is not often completed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Identifying patients at an increased risk of cancer, even in the absence of a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, is important in tailoring screening and preventive measures. As we look to the future, we need to critically approach mainstreaming and determine how to reincorporate comprehensive genetic risk assessment into our models.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}